Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 28, 2023 - David Icke

16:21

You Can Silence An Individual But You Can't Silence A Message - Gareth Icke Tonight

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	The Ukrainian Prime Minister Volodymyr Zelensky has visited Canada on his latest swag bag world tour, but it wasn't quite the PR fawn-a-thon it normally is.
	I mean, sure, he got the casino chips he went there for, and the Canadian government rolled out the red carpet for him and his action man fancy dress outfit, but they also rolled out a former member of the Nazi SS kill squads.
	And like a gaggle of seals at feeding time, they gave the chap a rapturous standing ovation.
	Good luck explaining that one away.
	The Toronto Sun went with the headline, did not see that coming.
	Well played.
	But I wasn't shocked, not really, in fact I rarely am these days, by anything.
	I'm old enough to remember less than 10 years into the past when it was widely reported that Ukraine was infested with Nazis.
	The mainstream media bobbleheads that now call Ukrainian Nazis a Russian misinformation conspiracy theory were actually producing documentaries on them just a few years ago.
	Then the narrative shifted, as it does.
	You know, like that little sleight of hand.
	Of course, the Canadian Prime Minister's office has denied all knowledge and shifted the blame onto someone else who has since resigned.
	Is that true, though?
	Zelensky is at war with Russia, one of the world's massive military powers, and we're told Russia has spies and agents all over the world, infiltrating, manipulating, and in the case of Salisbury, if the official story is to be believed, even poisoning.
	No one No one gets near Zelensky without first being vetted thoroughly.
	In fact, no one gets inside the Canadian Parliament, a room packed with leaders of government, without first being cleared by Canadian intelligence.
	So how was Yeloroslav Hunker, a former member of the Waffen-SS, an organisation that committed atrocities against what Justin Trudeau would call people kind, allowed to not only enter the Parliament, but stand there receiving praise and applause as a, quote, Ukrainian and Canadian hero?
	They knew exactly who he was, and that's why he was there.
	The hatred for Russia is so deep-rooted within the nations of NATO that they wouldn't see honouring a Nazi as an issue because, you know, he killed some Russians, didn't he?
	The other thing that's clear when you look at the political class, and this is the same all over the world, is that they're not really very bright.
	Yaroslav Hunker is hailed as a hero for fighting the Russians during World War II.
	Yay!
	The public will love that.
	Well, who were the Russians fighting then?
	You are?
	The whole thing is only an issue now, of course, because public opinion exploded against it.
	They're not sorry it happened, they're sorry they got called out for it.
	The Nazis didn't lose the war, they were rebadged, and the powers behind them still wield that power today.
	As George Carlin said, Germany lost the war, but fascism won it.
	Several prominent members of the Nazi party and others within their ranks fled to the Americas after the war and avoided the ropes of Nuremberg.
	Now, one of them is a hero to the very fake liberal government that claimed the trucker protests, remember the ones that campaigned against despicable vaccine mandates, were Nazis.
	In fact, they even claimed that when truckers went honk honk, they actually meant hail Hitler.
	Wow.
	They're always what they accuse others of.
	But no one seems to be asking the rather important question, what was Yaroslav Unka doing in Canada?
	How was he allowed to live free from consequences to the ripe old age of 98?
	Presumably, he never misgendered anyone online.
	So you get your bank account shut down if you donate to a freedom movement in Canada, but if you're a member of the SS, no worries mate, don't worry about it.
	Do you want some extra maple syrup with that?
	It's a joke.
	But let's pretend that the people responsible for inviting Hunker didn't know who he was.
	The idea is laughable, of course, given the security he would have had to have cleared, but let's just pretend for now, for today, they didn't know.
	Why are you clapping him then?
	If you don't know who he is, and therefore what he's done, why are you standing up to applaud him?
	Here, go and applaud that lad.
	Where is he?
	That's the question you'd ask, but no.
	Like lemmings off the cliff, the suited bitches of Bill and Klaus all do as they're told.
	And people think they can vote their way out of this mess.
	They're all bastards, folks.
	You're going to the polling station to choose between AIDS and cancer, a right hook or a left hook.
	A poker in the right eye or, oh no, poker in the left eye.
	Still a poker in the eye, isn't it?
	It's not a choice.
	That's not democracy.
	That's just nonsense.
	They've never had such control over the internet.
	And that's what they're telling us now, that they are taking control.
	And they will police us with everything we say.
	So what do you think the answer is then, mate, in terms of... Because I'll be honest with you, I'm not willing to censor myself.
	I don't see the point in that.
	Do you know what I mean?
	I'm not going to be an edited version of who I am because, do you know what I mean, as well as just pack my bags and get off now.
	So how do you think...
	Well, how are you personally?
	And how are we going to get around that, do you think?
	Because I look at these free speech platforms that have suddenly appeared.
	I think you're absolutely right.
	They've kind of put everyone in a goldfish bowl, haven't they?
	And so on one level, you're kind of in a bit of an echo chamber.
	But also, yes, they are monitoring.
	And now it's gone from monitoring to actually, well, we're going to prosecute you for it.
	So I understand that, you know, they're really upping the ante.
	So what do you think people can do?
	I mean, some will edit themselves, you're right.
	Some people will absolutely do that and just go, you know, I want a quiet life.
	But obviously that's quite a short-sighted view because then, you know, the more you don't call them out, the further along the agenda goes anyway.
	So what would you do personally or what would you say to people, you know, to look at doing to try and circumnavigate this bill?
	What we did, and people have done it, you know, because they shut us down off of the main social media during the COVID, right?
	And they put us in the goldfish bowl where we couldn't influence people.
	That's where Rebels on Roundabouts was invented and the Yellow Boards.
	And we was on the side of roads, we were on roundabouts, we were outside hospitals with Big messages.
	The messages that we were putting on social media were now in big black and white, well, yellow and white writing, outside hospitals, outside roundabouts.
	People were seeing our message.
	We went into town centres with loud hailers and speakers.
	I hate to say it, but if it comes back to that, if they shut us down completely, then places like Speakers Corner, We'll be doing that in every high street.
	We'll be standing there.
	We'll be banging our drum.
	And we'll be getting our message out.
	Because if they won't let us get our message out online, then we have to go out and do it in person.
	Because the message is the thing that's important.
	And the message is what they're scared of.
	They don't care about me.
	They don't care about people like us.
	They care about the message that we're putting out.
	And we've got to get that message out to people.
	Whether it's on social media, whether it's standing in the high street, whether it's things like the light newspaper, We've got to get that message out.
	We put leaflets in people's doors.
	It's all about the message.
	And they can't shut the message down.
	They just can't, Gaz.
	Am I right in thinking that a kind of open, transparent, long-term study between vaccinated people and unvaccinated people, and the differences between them in terms of health, long-term health, that's never actually been published by the CDC, has it?
	It's never been done by the CDC or, you know, the U.S.
	Department of Health and Human Services in general.
	We've asked for this.
	Mr. Kennedy and I have asked federal authorities to do this type of study for over 20 years now, but they absolutely refuse to do this type of analysis.
	But it's, you know, it's been done in part independently, but never by the federal authorities.
	Well, why do you think that is?
	Is it simply the case of actually, if they were to print something like that, then the house of cards would kind of crumble?
	I believe so.
	You know, from my analysis and from doing the preparations for this book with Mr. Candy, we've seen that unvaccinated children and unvaccinated adults have many fewer health issues than their vaccinated counterparts.
	And vaccines, of course, are big business.
	And when you're looking at the CDC, the FDA, the HHS in general, you're looking at captured agencies.
	They've been captured by the pharmaceutical industry.
	The FDA receives about 45% of its income directly from big pharma through what they call the fast track program.
	And so vaccines are big business and, you know, if they publish this study and show truly the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated persons, then, like you said, that house of cards would fall.
	Did you ever think it will?
	And I know that's a bit of a crystal ball question, but do you think it will come down eventually?
	Well, I hope that this, you know, by publishing this book and elucidating these studies that we found hiding in plain sight, that that will help.
	You know, my prognostication skills are probably as good as anybody else's.
	I do think that there's sort of this toxic tipping point where As more and more boosters are rolled out for the COVID-19 vaccine, people are getting fatigued.
	They're starting to see through the whole COVID-19 narrative of vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate, and somehow we're going to vaccinate our way.
	Out of this pandemic, and it's causing them to ask questions such that, you know, there will be a breaking point at some point, you know, what that looks like.
	I have, I really don't have a good idea, but I do think that we will reach a tipping point soon.
	You know, I've worked in Cambodia, and I've worked with survivors, you know, where members of their entire family were genocided under Pol Pot.
	Pol Pot, by the way, was a dictator who rolled into Phnom Penh, the capital city in Cambodia in the late 70s, and said he targeted the intellectual elite.
	He targeted people who didn't have calluses on their hand, who were wearing glasses.
	Because if you didn't have calluses, you weren't working in the field.
	If you were wearing glasses, it meant you could afford it and you were a member of the
	elite.
	And that didn't really mean you were the elite.
	You could have been a school teacher, not exactly a billionaire.
	But you know, doctors, lawyers, teachers, government workers, postal workers, anybody
	who had basically a job that wasn't in the field, he targeted.
	Why?
	Because those are the people with brain power and money who can fight back during an overthrow
	And he wanted to exterminate those people first and foremost.
	And he did it by way of lying.
	He said, you know, we're going to make everybody equal.
	It's going to be this communist utopia.
	And you are all going to learn how to live on a commune and be equal.
	And it's just going to be for a few weeks.
	Gather up all your worldly goods and follow me out into the fields, you know, by way of gunpoint.
	And so you had these Cambodian Lawyers, right?
	And accountants or journalists.
	I mean, people like you and me who were putting gold in their baby's diapers to hide it smart.
	The ones who did that very, very smart because they weren't ripping diapers open to check for hidden gold at the checkpoints.
	But the ones who just carried on that person got stripped of all their money ASAP at the first checkpoint.
	And they're carrying bikes and chairs and food.
	And I mean, just imagine if somebody came to you right now and said, Pack up your entire house, take only what you can carry on your back or on your bike, right?
	And they're being marched out into the fields, and they're marched, and they're marched, and they're marched.
	And then they're forced to live in a commune, but it's not a utopian commune because the way that communism makes you equal is by making you equally poor.
	And when they weren't starved to death quickly enough, Why, the genocidal government would take the survivors, as it were, and they would come and they would shoot them.
	But bullets are pricey and communists are poor, typically.
	So they rapidly did away with shooting them in the back of the head and they started just hatcheting them in the back.
	Because you can just yank it out and do it to the next guy and the next guy, right?
	It's a much cheaper form of execution.
	And they would let these people just fall face down into shallow graves.
	Where 45 years later, my friend, the bones of the dead during typhoon season will rise up from these shallow graves.
	And for their part, the Cambodians will gather up the bones and put them in this big glass structure.
	It's like a big glass Rubik's Cube that goes three stories high.
	And if you go to the killing fields of Cambodia, which I did with my eight-year-old, but I didn't know about this monument.
	I just thought it was a bunch of empty fields with some signs.
	But at the end of the Killing Fields is this monument, and my eight-year-old, who was in third grade at the time, made a beeline for it.
	And by the time I caught up with her, she was literally eyeball to eye socket with the skull of a child who was probably her age when they had been executed.
	I don't know if you can see the, you know, the Yeah.
	So it's quite a shocking little monument.
	And she looked at me and she said, Mama, how did this happen?
	And I said, those in power lied to the people.
	And by the time the people figured it out, it was too darn late.
	So let this be a lesson.
	Do not ever believe those in power just because they're in power.
	If you're going to do anything as a baseline measure, disbelieve them until they've proven that they can be trusted.
	But I work with these people.
	I work with these people and they tell me over and over again, the day The government came to town and lied to us, said it was going to be two weeks, literally, right?
	Same playbook, same exact playbook.
	The birds were chirping, the sun was shining, and it just seemed so surreal.
	It didn't feel like it could really be happening.
	And we thought, well, what are we fighting?
	We're not going to fight now, but had we been able to look into a crystal ball and see what would be coming down the pike months and years later, of course we would have fought.
	We would have given everything we had, every inch of gold and silver and every worldly good, to avoid what was coming down the pike.
	And if I may, I know it's been a long answer, but Churchill said, it's just two or three sentences here, He said, if you will not fight for right when you can easily, easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all of the odds against you and a precarious chance of survival.
	And then it says in the final sentence, if I can get it here, there may even be a worse fate.
	You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory.
	For it is better to perish than to live as slaves.
	That's all for this week.
	As always, thank you so much for tuning in.
	Now, you may have seen that my dad's ban from 26 European countries was this week upheld by a rather sheepish and embarrassed-looking judge who didn't make any eye contact.
	The long and short of it is that if the Dutch government thinks you're a danger, then you're a danger.
	His crime was being asked to speak at an anti-war rally.
	That's anti-war.
	Now, if he was a warmonger or an arms dealer, he'd be allowed to come and go, Freely.
	My dad is already banned from Australia and the 26 European country ban doesn't just stop there.
	The list, which is called the Schengen list, is also adopted by other nations such as Canada, the USA and New Zealand.
	It's insane.
	And so I find it very strange that you have these so-called alternative commentators all jumping to the defense of the likes of Russell Brand and even someone like Andrew Tate, but it's crickets.
	When it comes to my dad, it seems that Ike is still the most offensive four-letter word in the English language for some people.
	Brand has been accused of committing criminal acts, something he strongly denies, and of course he should be treated innocent until proven guilty.
	But as a result of these serious allegations, he gets his YouTube demonetized, and we have outrage among the social commentators.
	But my dad, who's not been accused of a crime, He had his YouTube deleted, not just demonetized, but deleted three years ago along with his Facebook, his Spotify, etc.
	And now he's banned from a big chunk of the planet.
	Surely that would be worthy of a comment or two.
	Or is freedom only reserved for wealthy celebrities?

▲