All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 3, 2023 - David Icke
19:31
The 'Woke' Clowns Of The Week - David Icke
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
There's a lot of things that I've said over the years, which were perceived to be crazy.
and then suddenly they start to move mainstream.
I'm waiting for someone to convince me that we don't live in a simulation.
What is real?
How do you define real?
If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, taste and see, then real is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain.
What if all you ever knew was a lie?
I've got a few contenders this week.
And then I've got a winner.
And the competition is fierce.
Oh my god, it's fierce.
Let's start with this one.
Video from disturbed visitors shows men dressed in drag greeting children at Disney Princess Makeover Boutique.
It has to be It appears Disney is still assigning grown men dressed in skirts and dresses as greeters for children at its Disneyland Bibbidi Bobbidi Boutique attraction, where little girls are treated to a princess makeover, just like the blokes greeting them.
Lives of TikTok posted a pair of images from visitors to Disneyland in Florida showing that two burly men, one rotund and bearded, wearing dresses and greeting small children and their parents.
What were the parents doing?
Just out of interest?
This is not the first time social media erupted upon reports of facial hair sporting men in dresses.
being seen working as greeters at Disneyland's boutique that caters for little girls.
All part, all part, isn't it Disney, of perceptually manipulating little kids.
This very godmother's apprentice got some flack when this clip of their shift at the Bibbity
Bobbity boutique at Disney went viral. Some seem to think that a male presenting godmother
princess goes too far in the fantasy world of princess makeovers There have been calls for the entertainment resort to be boycotted, with critics saying it's distracting and that it breaks the illusion.
But the background is that Disney made changes to make it more inclusive, renaming their fairy godmothers-in-training role to apprentices, to make it more gender-neutral.
The mum who posted the clip and other parents have backed this Disney worker for providing her daughter with an unforgettable experience.
Disney, owned by the cult, for the cult, to promote the cult agenda.
Now, abuse of children is everywhere.
But on the other hand, the same people that do the abuse, they care so much about children and children's rights.
Children must have rights.
Okay.
Well, How about this?
A sexuality expert, I bet she's not, has said that parents must ask babies for permission before changing their nappy.
There are people under medication for far less Sexuality expert claims parents must ask permission before changing their child's nappy.
Deanne Carson believes consent must be given by the child before their dirty nappy is removed.
Here she is on the ABC suggesting how to go about it.
I'm going to change your nappy now.
Is that okay?
Of course the baby's not going to respond.
Yes, mom, that's awesome.
I'd love to have my nappy changed.
But if you leave a space, and wait for body language and wait to make eye contact, then you're letting that child know that their response matters.
But Ms Carson has defended her comments saying the idea around consent is about empowering children with their rights and protecting them from sexual abuse.
So, abusing children sexually and in so many other ways, that seems to be fine.
Drag queens and blokes with beards in dresses.
But we have to ask babies permission to change their nappy.
I think one of the themes today.
Well, it's not really a revelation, it's more a confirmation.
Is the world is run by lunatics.
Another contender for Clown of the Week.
Firefighters urged to embrace diversity and use gender-neutral language during emergency call-outs.
Firefighters are being urged to use gender-neutral language during emergency call-outs.
It can be revealed.
Kent Fire and Rescue Service staff are encouraged to use inclusive language with members of the public to embrace diversity.
It includes swapping he or she in favor of they or them as part of the service's effort to recognize that everyone is unique and everyone has value.
Well, except if you disagree with them, because then they'll demonize you.
Why then is Kent Fire and Rescue insisting firefighters address members of the public as they or them?
How is it inclusive to pander to 0.26% of the population by using language that will confuse 99.74%?
You see, what people do is now subordinate to this woke madness.
I mean, the firefighters arrive often in a dangerous situation for people, and they need to get them out of danger by putting themselves in danger, actually.
But no!
Hey, excuse me!
You know, you!
You on fire over there!
Are you a they or a them or a he or a she or what?
What are you?
I just thought I'd ask before I get me water going.
Can you imagine it?
And all you have to do, all you have to do, is to put lunatics in management positions and then have the people the lunatics are imposing upon, i.e.
those that actually are at the cutting edge at the coalface, just say, yes, sir, no, sir, it's crazy, but I better do it anyway.
So the way to overcome the lunacy is for those at the coalface to say, you're having a fricking laugh, right?
We're not doing it.
Gone, finished.
Well, we'll sack all the firefighters!
So what are you going to do when there's a fire?
Uh, exactly.
So, Kent Fire and Rescue Service Chief Executive Anne Millington.
Can you imagine having a conversation with this woman?
She said, as a service, we recognize and understand that everyone is unique and everyone has value.
Unless you disagree with us, in which case we'll demonize you and sack you.
Everything we do is about keeping people safe based on kindness and compassion.
Unless you disagree with us and then we'll have your balls for breakfast.
We always encourage our colleagues to be themselves, unless you disagree with us.
And we want the people we serve across Kent and Medway to be confident in accessing these services.
Can you imagine the people of Kent and Medway having any confidence in this woman who is
chief executive of the fire service?
Oh!
Not the contender.
Weekly contender.
Why did the BBC manipulate this genuine photograph of a white voter's hand to make it black?
This is the BBC.
This is the BBC.
Home service, as they used to say on the radio when I was a kid.
Ah, dear.
This is the BBC.
It's now run by lunatics.
Yeah, we noticed, we noticed.
That's why we're not paying the bloody license fee.
The BBC was facing questions after it admitted being caught Blacking up an image as part of its election coverage.
Election coverage in Wales.
They used this white hand voting in Wales, in a picture some time ago when there was another election.
But this time, it's exactly the same picture, white hand, but they've made the hand black.
Because, well, that suits the BBC.
Woke agenda.
So that's why they did it.
And we are being asked to take this organization seriously and believe a word that it ever bloody says.
We shouldn't.
But that's the BBC.
And that is what is telling us what to believe about the world.
But clown of clown of the week.
Little drumroll... is... NASA scientist.
Now, I have to say, scientist has got to be in quotes.
NASA scientist Kimberly Miner revealed how she sobbed from climate grief after learning blue oaks would die in her native California.
So, When you're a scientist, you want people dominated by emotion.
You don't want people that look at the evidence in a quiet, calculated way and come to rational conclusions.
You want, we're all gonna die!
You're a scientist, aren't you?
Yes!
And that's a scientist.
Climate scientist.
"...has embarked on an emotion-laden rant about how she is suffering from so-called climate grief due to droughts in her native California, aired in an article for Nature..." That's supposed to be her.
You know, serious magazine.
The assertion comes from Dr. Kimberly R. Minor, a climate scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab in Pasadena.
One of the world's foremost publications, Nature, billed the op-ed as coming from an educated expert.
Though the language used was predominantly emotional.
Oh, very scientific.
Instead of a serious look at data pertaining to the Earth's atmosphere, readers were offered an anecdote where Miner recalled crying after realizing a drought would mean the death of hundreds of California's endemic blue oak trees.
Attempting to revoke sympathy, the co-chair of the NASA Interagency Forum on Climate Change Risks, claimed both she and her colleagues were suffering severe emergent health.
The account from an accredited Climate Change Institute research assistant professor, who has been referring to the state's current 20-year mega drought, Did not address other droughts in the region throughout history, many of which have lasted more than 200 years.
None of those instances which experts have confirmed through the analysis of oceanic currents and other practices like carbon dating can be connected to you or none of them can be connected to humans and nor could they have been prevented with any human intervention.
Seemingly undeterred by those facts, Miner continued to peddle how she copes with the stress, along with warning that researchers must find personal ways to cope with further impending losses.
And she says that her colleagues are suffering from emergent health challenges.
They're all affected by overwork, exhaustion and extreme stress.
And the only other thing they all have in common, she says, is that they study climate change.
Well, I wonder if that's the common denominator.
If you have not got the intelligence, emotional and mental, to realize that the data is being fixed for a global dystopian agenda to be justified, then you're not very bloody bright.
And there are others, of course, who know it's a scam, but it's good money.
So, she says younger scientists such as herself are responsible for educating the masses.
I think.
A passage preaching what many would perceive as misinformation ensued, blaming the alleged slow demise of the Blue Oak on permafrost wrought by climate change.
Well, here's just a quick glimpse, thankfully quick glimpse, of this lady answering questions from, appropriately, children.
Question one comes from Jesse.
Hey Jesse!
So I study a ton of things about climate change.
Now I'm looking at the Arctic.
Think about like the North Pole.
It's cold almost year-round.
Now it gets a little warmer in the summer.
I'm looking at how the soil that's supposed to be frozen, it's called permafrost, is Thawing.
And as this soil starts thawing, all sorts of creatures that we know of, and some that we don't know about, are waking up.
Potentially there's microbes, some scary viruses too, things like anthrax that you may have heard about, or the plague that you may have heard about.
The Black Plague is literally what you studied in history class.
When people were infected, they died, and then people in the old days buried them in permafrost because they thought, hey, this is never gonna thaw.
Well, now it's thawing.
The concern is that we might actually have the virus exposed to more people.
It's really, really important to make sure that we know if any of these viruses can have an impact before they come down and potentially make people like us sick.
And that is a pertinent reminder of the kind of mentality that is driving the climate change hikes.
And thus justifying the dystopia that's emerging as a result.
Experts, you must be joking.
So I'm On the road, as they say, from this week, this Saturday, I'm talking in Belfast and then I go all over Britain in the next couple of months or so.
And I'm not going to be able to do that dot connector much this month.
Maybe I'll get one in about halfway through the month when I'm in Derby.
We'll see.
And Jamie will be standing in for me in the meantime, and I'll be back as usual in October.
And the new book, The Dream, is just out, literally now, and it goes, well, kind of massively deeper in the rabbit hole than I think.
Anyone's gone before.
See what you think.
See you when I see you.
Probably mid-September.
Bye for now.
Thanks for watching.
And then suddenly, they start to move mainstream.
I'm waiting for someone to convince me that we don't live in a simulation.
She's so good. She's so good.
What is real?
How do you define real?
If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, taste and see, then real is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain.
▲
Export Selection