All Episodes
Sept. 22, 2022 - David Icke
35:00
"Lets Not Put A Gloss On It. This Is Medical Murder" - Dr Mike Yeadon Talks To Right Now
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This week on Right Now, former Pfizer head of respiratory disease research, Dr. Mike
Yeadon joins us from Florida.
Weather forecaster Piers Corbin is in the studio to talk all things climate change.
Journalist Steve Laws is on the line from Southend to talk about the mass influx of migrant boats arriving on the South Coast.
And finally, we're joined by a brave whistleblower from within China,
who will be telling us just what life is like under the communist regime.
This is the story of a man who was a communist.
He was a communist.
Newly-selected Prime Minister Liz Truss has once again pledged her unwavering commitment to freezing granny this winter by signing over another £3 billion in military aid to the comedian in the cargo tracksuit.
Where our money goes when it's left the public's purse is anyone's guess, of course.
It could wind up at the local casino.
For all we know.
What we do know, however, is that it isn't going to be used for anything that will help the British people.
Same goes with the Americans or the citizens of any other country that's handing over the keys to their vault to NATO's plaything.
These people want to watch the world burn and they're more than happy to use your tax contributions to fund the blue touch paper.
A war with China, Russia and notable others, such as Iran, against the West has always been the goal of those that sits above all of them.
NATO has been building its military infrastructure on the Russian border for decades.
This isn't new.
You see, war is big business.
It's not only big in the business of lining pockets with gold and silver, but it's also big in the business of changing society, moulding it in your design.
The perceived threat of invasion, of economic destruction and ultimately death can make a population hand over anything if they're promised security and peace in return.
Now, the details of what that security and peace actually look like I never discussed.
But you can guarantee you'll be worse off financially and have less freedom of opportunity than you had before.
Our final guest this evening is on the line from Florida.
Dr. Mike Yeadon served as the Chief Scientist and Vice President of Pfizer's Allergy and Respiratory Research Unit, where he oversaw the development of treatments for respiratory diseases such as asthma and COPD.
During the COVID madness, Dr. Yeadon was a voice of reason and a beacon for many of us that knew instinctively that something was wrong.
His knowledge of the pharmaceutical industry and vaccines provided crucial information for many people who wanted to research the Covid jab and not just blindly roll up their sleeves.
Dr. Yeadon, thank you so much for joining us.
Just briefly, because I know you must get asked this goodness knows how many times, but what is your background within the pharmaceutical industry?
So, Gareth, I will say thank you to you and your team for the platform.
And also thank you, the audience, for being here.
There's no point in me speaking if I can't reach anyone.
Yes, so by way of background, my first degree was in biochemistry and toxicology before it was even a proper subject.
I did a research-based PhD on the effects of opiates like morphine and fentanyl on respiration.
So it's kind of an amazing coincidence, really, given what people like Stuart Wilkie have told us about what went on in care homes.
Then from 1988 to 2011, I worked in the pharmaceutical industry.
And the last job, I was head of global research for respiratory for Pfizer, and as you say, vice president.
Then when they closed their site in Sandwich UK, I became an independent.
I provided consulting services of expert opinions to 30 biotech companies, mostly in the US.
And also in the middle of that time, I founded with a couple of former Pfizer colleagues and led a CEO, a small biotech, which I raised money for.
We did a clinical trial, successful, and we were bought for about 10 times the investment by the world's biggest drug company at the time, which is called Novartis of Switzerland.
And so in 2017, I settled into a comfortable early retirement and thought, well, I can play with my motorbikes and look after the grandkids for the rest of My life.
And then early in 2020, I noticed people I used to work with, like Sir Patrick Balance, hello Pat, lying to me through the television screen.
And I thought, what are you doing?
They started saying things like, we don't know if you, once you've had this illness, we don't know if you'll be immune.
And so that was the first time Gareth I knew, Now, he was actually lying because he and I were brought up at the same time in the same UK university system.
So our foundation courses would be the same, including Introduction to Immunology.
He had the same set text I did.
I remember in one interview, I actually held the book up, still had a copy of it in my loft.
So that means Pat Valancer might even know the same basic things, and what he was saying to you was nonsense.
And it just got worse.
So basically, I realised, well, if people are telling us untruths, it means they're covering for something else.
And by summer, I was pretty convinced that there was a, basically, people were lying about an infectious disease in order to get people to accept absurd interferences with their life, lockdowns, masking, mass testing, border closures, and so on.
And I could, since they weren't, they never, there's no any realistic chance they would do anything to illness transmission and that had been studied and proved by WHO who released a hundred page document showing that all of those measures were ineffective and should not be used.
Nevertheless, they were all imposed.
And at that point, I remember really from late March 2020, I thought we are in so much trouble because you don't shut down the modern world for an open-ended period using techniques that you know that they know are ineffective unless your intention is to smash the economy Separate civil society and then of course quite quickly we heard nice people like Gates and Blair telling us that we would need to wait for a vaccine and then have digitized proof that we'd had it and then at that point by summer I thought that's the game.
They're going to use fear, measures to smash the economy, and to get us used to being separated, coerce us into accepting injections which we could come on to, which I knew they could never work, and they weren't even safe.
And over time, I worked out that, unfortunately, the most likely explanation for all of these facts, after, say, 41 years of training and practice in this field, And most likely explanation was totalitarian tyranny through electronic controls such as vaccine passports and digital money.
And then I could see no reason why people who regard people like you and me and your audience, Gareth, as useless eaters, I could see no reason why these multi-billionaires would strive mightily to keep me and you alive, or warm, or housed.
I thought the most likely explanation would be Complete control and then, frankly, deletion of most of the population.
And I think that's what the Gans did.
I was exactly the same, you know, like, early doors, it was something's not right, something doesn't add up, and then slowly things were coming in and you were like, ah, now I get it, now what it's about.
And I asked the same question as you did, Mike, which was, why is it the same people that are telling us there's too many people on the planet are the same people now trying to save everyone, you know?
What an amazing coincidence.
That is an amazing coincidence.
It is quite interesting and it's worth mentioning that if you look at the stakeholders that sit behind the people who are doing the saying and the telling, say medical people who are trained in medicine, you'll often find things like the Rockefellers because they've been very big philanthropic contributors to health and medicine for a long time.
But you keep bumping into the same people.
You look at the people who are speaking to us and then you go one level behind or two levels behind.
Oh, look, they're a lifetime Guggenheim scholar or something like that.
And then if you go... Yeah, so this whole pandemic thing is... Because I wasn't looking for rabbit holes and conspiracies, I was very slow.
But I can now see, for example, in case your viewers don't know this, The people who have sprung this deception upon us have been practicing it every couple of years for 25 years.
25 years.
And if you want to see a very easy-to-consume documentary, one-hour documentary by the German investigative journalist called Paul Schreier.
S-C-H-R-E-Y-E-R.
And the program is called Pandemic Simulations Preparation for a New Era?
And you'll find it on all of the video channels.
And I think everybody should watch it because when I watched it, my heart went into my boots, Gareth, because like most people, you might remember me saying this, in my shed, my shed video, a former BBC friend of mine came down to take me, a lovely
guy.
I remember saying, I was asked by him, do you think that this is all planned?
And I said, I said I don't think so.
I do think that something called opportunistic... opportunism, something like that.
Convergent opportunism, that was the phrase I invented.
Bunch of nasty people, people pushing digital money, people pushing vaccines, people pushing authoritarian control.
People pushing population control.
And I kidded myself that the reason we were seeing what looked like a plan is that there were pro-greens, anti-petroleum industry.
I thought there's half a dozen stakeholders who have seized the opportunity of a world in turmoil and they'll all put their shoulders and drive it across the line.
And it was partly for two reasons.
One is it was too frightening to believe it could be planned.
And also, I kidded, I said to, like, everyone who's challenged me on this, they said, oh, don't be stupid, Eden, this is far too complicated to be a plan.
And I thought that too, but I'll tell you what, you skeptics of what I've said, watch the Paul Schreyer video.
You will find all of the stakeholders, like, I don't know, I can't remember the name now, it doesn't matter, but the hospital that He does all of the coronavirus camps that you can find online.
Oh, John Hopkins.
Johns Hopkins, yes, exactly.
So, Johns Hopkins was there in the first simulation at Andrews Air Force Base, which is just down the road from Washington.
And I think it was about 97, something like that.
And they ran a tabletop simulation of the escape.
of some infectious organism from a lab.
So it could either have been deliberate or a terrorist action, or it could have been inadvertent.
And they basically, roughly every couple of years, they ran one of these simulations, and they got bigger and bigger and bigger, longer and longer.
They even retained in the end a scriptwriter, someone who's probably good enough to write top quality Hollywood scriptwriting kind of stuff.
And you can find them all online.
In fact, everything in the Paul Schreier documentary, the journalist says every single one of the sources I refer to, you can find online.
So anyone who doesn't think this has been rehearsed, go and look at maybe just, you know, pick three or four of them, like Lockstep or Atlantic Storm, things like that, Dark Winter.
They're all simulations of an infectious organism, biowarfare, or so-called naturally spreading pandemic.
Now, a couple of things for you that I now know as an expert, which even I didn't know early on.
Why would you bother rehearsing using military money?
It was right next to St.
Andrew's Air Force Base, for God's sake.
Why would you bother rehearsing something that can't happen?
So the last time we had an allegedly serious respiratory illness pandemic was 1918.
And again, this is one of these things that I speak to my wife every few days, and I'll say, you know X, Y, and Z?
And she'll say, don't tell me you found out that's not true either.
So there wasn't a 1918 flu pandemic of the size that we now understand it.
So there probably was some sort of, I know there was several pulses of death often in young men who were de-mobbed from the war in Europe.
Many of them had been exposed to mustard gas, chlorine, and then they were so stressed In adequate conditions, I think a lot of them got bacterial pneumonia and died.
There may or may not have been flu, but what's interesting is, and this is a good bit of evidence, this is not me, I've got a Russian friend, a Ukrainian friend actually, who went back to the source material of the Russian Academy of Infectious Diseases in 1922.
Because it was ahead of an international health regulation conference.
Even back in the day, Gareth, they were working out, how do we keep trade going smoothly when there might be, you know, plague in one place, cholera in another?
And they had regulations, and it would help people if they had an agreement as to what to do.
So these Russians got together and had like a two-day update, and do you know what?
They mentioned cholera, black death, polio, Whatever, yellow fever.
He didn't mention any spiritual illness at all, let alone flu.
And yet, we all lived to believe four years earlier!
The largest number of people since the Black Death have died.
And she said it's remarkable.
She then went forwards, and you never find it in the Russian.
What you find is in the 50s, magazine articles doing retrospectives on the pandemic.
I'm saying they recreate, they created the impression of a serious pandemic.
And no one goes to check the original sources.
Nobody.
And I didn't either.
I mean, you largely believe what you're being told.
So what I'm saying is, what I'm asking is, why would a group of people rehearse for a pandemic when there's never actually been one?
And I can explain why they're pretty much impossible.
You can have a common cold, whatever causes it.
I've got questions about that now.
But let's accept the narrative of infectious pathogens.
Common cold can go round and round the world because, at its height, you normally feel a bit low and a bit miserable.
You might be sneezing, runny nose, congestion.
But you're not forced to withdraw from your normal world.
And so, you know, if these things are transmissible, you have the opportunity to transmit to other people.
With something as bad as influenza, again, whatever causes that, I've had whatever that was twice in my life, and I was so ill, I actually lost several days.
So, you know, not only can you not battle through it if you've really got whatever that was, you will be out of commission.
So you won't be interacting with people.
Guess what?
That means the so-called R0, the transmission coefficient, how many people
does the average infected person infect, gets smaller and smaller. So I am sure if you had
flying Ebola, airborne flying Ebola, which sounds like the worst thing on the planet, I think it
would be self-extinguishing within days.
So you can't have both widespread across all countries and very severe at the same time.
It's an impossibility, immunologically it's impossible. And you know what, if it was possible,
don't you think in the last few million years it's quite likely would have happened?
And it's never happened.
So on the one hand these people, these throbbing brains in military and intelligence and universities are clubbing together to hold a simulation on something which I've just explained they knew perfectly well could never happen.
Yeah, what were they doing?
And of course, and the interesting thing for anyone who... Oh, and by the way, in case they don't know it, they probably do know it, but just before the apparent outbreak of COVID, a group of individuals, the same group of individuals, pretty much, got together and held Event 201 In October 2019, and this time, the scenario was of the emergence from China of a novel coronavirus which spread around the world.
I mean, what a coincidence!
Within weeks of them holding the simulation, that very thing happened.
So of course the...
If you watch any of those simulations, you'll find they don't, as you would hope, put in place measures to stop people getting ill and to help treat them if they're ill.
That's never a consideration.
The only consideration is maintaining law and order.
And the elite group sitting around the table always trying to work out, you know, how can we apply, how can we get the public to accept authoritarian measures?
That's what it was always about every time.
And then they always would simulate some medical treatment that you're required to have, oddly enough.
So just quickly on the vaccines.
I mean, I came into this three years ago as, I would say, a pro-vaccine person.
The embarrassment is I was a person who accepted what I was told.
I worked in small molecules and biologics.
I didn't work in vaccines.
But I was a good immunologist and I did work in rational drug design.
That is, you build something in order to perform a task.
And that's what these alleged vaccines are.
And in fact, they're more similar to the work I've done for 30 years than they are to traditional vaccines.
So if someone says, Eden's not a vaccinologist, so he can't comment, I would say the vaccinologist can't comment either.
Because these are nothing to do with the work they've understood in the past.
But here's the trick.
And again, I...
I came across this about a year and a half ago and I think I forced it out of my mind because it's too frightening.
I came across a Cochrane Foundation review on 10 years retrospective analysis of influenza vaccines in the UK, in fact England and Wales.
And you would expect, would you not, gentle listener, that if these things are any good, they should have reduced the rate of hospitalization for flu and the rate of death from flu, at least in the elderly, the people who got them.
And unfortunately, the Cochrane Foundation review, which is what's called a meta-analysis, it's bringing together all of the properly done placebo-controlled trials, if there are any, or case-controlled trials, if not.
So it brings them all together, and the bottom line was, doesn't make any difference.
Doesn't make any difference at all.
And I remember, I've described it as feeling quite unmoored for a few days, because I kept thinking, so hold on a minute, so these things don't actually, they don't save lives, they don't prevent severe illness, and yet drug companies are making them, the regulators have approved them, the NHS and the government have agreed to buy them, and then all GP surgeries have been agreed to inject, what, 20 or 30 million people every year.
And they know it doesn't work.
And I thought, oh my God.
So the bottom line is, from that, is this, that we think, immunologists think that the reason, so I'm staying with the official narrative, although I think it's a lie, but let's stick with the narrative that there's a virus going around, particularly attacking the vulnerable who are old and already ill.
That's what we were told.
If you're, the more older you are and the iller you are, the more you're likely to die, if you guess it.
And so I asked myself, why does that happen?
Why is a 35-year-old not just as likely to perish?
And we think the answer is that the immune system in the elderly becomes tired and slow.
They don't respond as well to new pathological threats.
And that's true.
And you know what?
Why would you expect their immune systems to respond well to an injected vaccine?
Because it's the same thing, really, and they don't.
I've just explained how the Cochrane Foundation review shows that that's right, that the flu vaccines don't work.
Well, of course, of course, even if the narrative was true, this is my killer point.
The people who set about designing and bringing you a vaccine knew that there couldn't possibly be a solution for the problem they had just painted.
Isn't that stunning?
And in fact, if the narrative was true, and I don't think it was, but if you believe the narrative, the appropriate response would be what people like Dr Peter McCulloch, Ted Solenko, Pierre Corey, Teslory, all of those people.
It would be cast around any medicine chest and find off patents, well understood, cheap I would say at least half of the medicines on the market started their life intended to be used for a different purpose than the one that's on the box today.
Believe it or not.
So people who say, oh, how unlikely would it be that you would find hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin being useful in this situation?
I'd say, oh, sincerely, really common.
About half of the drugs on the market started life in the mind or hands of people like me 20 years earlier, intended for a completely different medical indication.
So no, I'd say it's more common than not that you would find something, because all you're trying to do is, well it's not trivial, but it's what my professional life was about.
Try and understand common pathological processes.
What goes wrong?
What goes wrong when people are ill?
So if you can't get to the cause, because often we don't know the cause, but it'll be okay, how is their body responding?
And in what ways is that appropriate?
Because you want to try and amplify it.
And in what ways is that power possibly harmful?
And you might want to turn the dial down on that.
And since inflammation and immunological responses are incredibly common to lots of different diseases.
It's not surprising that the medicine chest is full of all sorts of odds and ends, some approved medicines, that will alter those processes.
And so people like McCulloch knew that, and Corey knew that, so everyone knew that.
And the guy in, I must credit the guy in Marseilles, I know.
I'll find it.
Think of his name.
But anyway, he was the guy probably who got started.
But you know this stuff, Mike.
Most people don't know this.
They wouldn't realise this.
So, obviously, you spoke out against the vaccine and, you know, the possible dangers, which you were completely, completely vindicated in that opinion as the excess deaths, which they're trying to put down to other stuff.
But as those excess deaths are sadly proving you right, Do you think that the reason you've been so censored and so attacked is down to the fact that you have the credentials you do?
So say someone like me, I can say I think the vaccine is X, Y and Z and it's like, well, what do you know?
You're just a crazy conspiracy theorist.
I didn't realize until quite recently that the reason my articles and interviews received
such a violent response was I probably, inadvertently, was probably the most dangerous person on
the planet to the narrative.
I just didn't realize.
If I had realized it, it would have gone one of two ways.
I'd have been so terrified I wouldn't have said anything.
Or I would have realized, if I don't get on with this really quickly, it'll be, you know, it'll be curtains.
But instead, just naive me, I just sort of stumbled out into the light and started saying, you can't use... PCR is not a test.
Carrie Muller's kept reminding us, it's a process.
It's called the polymerase chain reaction.
It's not a test.
And if you use it as a clinical diagnostic, You'll be misled, that's what he said.
And so that's really where I came in.
I thought, that's not right.
And as it turned out, I got speaking to a person who'd spent 30 years doing PCR tests himself, working with some of the most famous Knighted scientist in London.
So I won't embarrass him, but I spoke to him many, many times.
He even went to go and work in one of these, they called them lighthouse labs, didn't they?
So, you know, in the spring of 2020, pathology labs up and down the country were running these PCR tests.
They probably really hadn't had any practice at it.
But by about June, by government diktat, they swept all the testing out of public health laboratories and the back end of, you know, path labs in big hospitals.
They swept it all out and into the private sector, into brand-newly configured sort of mega testing centers, which they called, I think, Lighthouse Labs and Super Labs.
And I remember saying to my wife, the only reason you would do that is to prevent scrutiny.
And so a friend of mine actually went to go and work in one of those in the summer of 2020, and it's all the things you would think.
They only hired Amateurs.
They wouldn't hire any good scientists because they would realize it was a complete pile of pants.
They didn't run proper controls through the whole... They never ran known negatives and known positives through the entire chain of custody.
They only had, like, controls on the final PCR plate.
Anyway, bottom line was, I learned enough from that gentleman to convince myself that the entire mass testing program was fraud.
And everything was built on the back of that as well, which is what is so extraordinary.
You know, I see people still on social media go, you know, my son's at university, he's got a runny nose and whatever, and he's tested positive, and you're like, but if you hadn't taken this fraudulent test, then your 18-year-old lad, who's probably done 10 pints of lager the night before, would just be a student with a runny nose.
It's extraordinary.
It is very odd because, again, I have to keep stepping back into the narrative to explain why it's so peculiar.
So if we accept the narrative again, this virus, that... I think this is officially in Hansard, which is the written formal record of sayings in Parliament.
Hansard.
And a minister of the Crown was asked, what is the latest estimate of humanity's government's understanding of what's called the infection fatality ratio?
So it's what fraction of people who are infected, if you take a representative sample of, say, 100,000 people, what fraction would die?
And I think the answer was something like 0.1%, about roughly 1 in 1,000, maybe a bit more.
Well, flu's about 0.1%.
That's what we think.
So that means even the official Lethality, the official threat to the population, is similar to flu.
So similar, because some flus are worse than whatever they are.
Some winters we have more casualties and others less.
So I would say the official threat to the population, if you believe the narrative from this SARS-CoV-2 thing, is within the envelope of flus that we normally don't comment on.
Yeah, the flus that suddenly disappeared as well, Mike, that no one seems to make a comment about.
It's just bizarre, isn't it?
We've shut the world down.
So even folks, if you think, well, I'm a conspiracy theorist, or I've had a stroke, I've even had friends say, I don't recognize this guy.
It's like, well, no, I've realized that there's a nasty plan to take over the world.
It does change you.
But the bottom line is that you can't argue with the fact that official Basically, the threat to the population is in the same order as influenza, seasonal influenza.
So from that point onwards, surely, rational friends out there, we must understand that do nothing is now the appropriate course of action.
Do nothing was always the appropriate course of action, which is what they did pretty much in Sweden, other than a bit of advice.
And apart from a brief period in the spring, that's what they did in Florida from about May or June, whatever it was, 2020, to the present day.
No masks, no mandates, no restrictions at all.
And yet everything's normal.
And basically, I think you've implied right there, Gareth, that if we stopped running this fraudulent, useless, untrustworthy PCR test, the pandemic would disappear within days.
Absolutely it would.
Absolutely.
Go on.
I just want to finish up on that point by making it clear I'm not an illness denier.
There's no question.
People are often ill and obviously the ones who are elderly and already unwell tend to be more likely to die.
And I think what happened in the spring of 2020 was all of those normal illnesses plus Anxiety and fear, which amplifies the likelihood of becoming sick.
It's the most potent suppression of normal host immunity, is fear.
And then they added on to that, they said to people, don't come to hospital, we don't want you, because don't you know there's a pandemic?
And then in addition, in some places they were injecting people with drugs that were essentially a lethal injection.
So that's how we got the excess deaths.
All the rest is just normal illnesses misattributed to so-called COVID by use of an untrustworthy test.
End of story.
Absolutely.
I agree 100%.
Just to finish up, Mike, you mentioned Stuart Wilkie at the start of the interview.
He actually sent us a question to put to you.
So I'm going to read it because it's a technical one, but it's something that I assume you'll probably be able to answer.
It's related, I believe, to the use of midazolam.
Now the question is, what is the interaction between opioids and benzodiazepine drugs?
Do they overlap on the receptors causing sleep apnea and deepen the respiratory depression?
So my PhD was in the effects of opiates like morphine on the respiratory pattern generator.
So unlike the heart, which if you take my heart out and put it in a warm dish of whatever, you know, petri dish of Krebs ringer solution and oxygenate it, it'll keep beating for quite a while.
I wouldn't be too happy, of course, I'll be dead.
But my heart has got an automatic rhythm.
If you take my guts out and go and wash them, put them in a big bowl of aerated solution, it will keep rhythmically contracting for quite a while.
And that's because it has its own sort of local nervous system called the mesenteric plexus.
That's not true of lungs.
Lungs don't have any automatic action.
They're driven by a group of cells that live near the base of your spine, just on top of your spine where it meets your skull.
And it's there that there are these receptors for paropiates.
And when they're struck by fentanyl, which is why people often kill themselves with overdoses,
or morphine as painkillers, it will tend to slow your depth and rate of breathing.
And midazolam works differently to suppress your desire to breathe, which is fired up
as CO2 levels rise.
Your hindbrain detects that change in CO2, so a change in local pH, actually, and then
those nerves fire to make you lower your diaphragm and then move your secondary accessory muscles,
and that swings the chest up, and then air is sucked into your body.
And so they act separately on the systems, the automatic systems that keep you breathing.
So yes, if you took one grain of morphine and one grain of midazolam, you would have
a greater negative effect on respiration than if you took two grains of midazolam or two
grains of morphine.
In other words, there's some kind of synergy.
They're quite dangerous.
In fact, it does say, if you get any benzodiazepines, like Valium is the oldest one, it will say,
if you take these, do not take alcohol.
It will warn you for a...
positive interaction and similarly if you're on prescription opiates it says you do not use alcohol do not use benzodiazepine so it's it's a well-recognized uh synergy it's helpful uh it you know honestly if i was dying in excruciating pain of a cancer that we all thought was going to kill me in the next few weeks i would much rather have mydazolamamorphine than go out screaming but for for anybody else and in fact it should never ever ever have been given to people with Respiratory illness.
Why?
Their airways are not obstructed.
That means they breathe, they're breathing freely.
If they're short of oxygen, maybe through like a panic attack, if you breathe shallowly and rapidly, you will blow off the oxygen, you will feel, your breathing will feel so disordered, you could collapse, you know, really bad.
So they should have been given A mask with extra oxygen, never sedated and ventilated, never just given this cocktail of drugs and put in the bed.
That's the worst possible thing.
I'm not going to put a gloss on it.
It's medical murder.
It's medical murder.
Yeah, and it happened all over the world.
Thank you so much for joining us, Dr. Yeadon.
We really appreciate it.
I got a bit, like when Gabe said, you know, we managed to get an interview with yourself, everyone in the office was absolutely over the moon with that.
So thank you for giving us the time.
I'm just an ordinary person doing extraordinary work, that's all.
That's it.
We appreciate it.
We appreciate it.
Hello, I'm Jamie Ike, CEO and founder of Iconic.
People regularly ask me why do we charge for our services?
Well, the answer is simple.
The ambition here is to build the biggest independent media platform in the world with the highest production standards.
We recently introduced a brand new £7.99 pricing plan to make Iconic affordable for all.
For just a couple of cups of coffee a month, you can access the world's premier media source.
Export Selection