All Episodes
Previous Next
June 13, 2022 - David Icke
01:40:41
David Icke Talks About The NWO On ANR TV Australia
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
♪♪ ♪♪
I still have a sense of decency.
And those people in the health area that still have a sense of decency.
And in government that still have a sense of decency.
And in the media, is there anyone left with a sense of decency in the mainstream media?
Then they've got to start acting upon what they see.
Because I say to them, just go home tonight, right, and look your kids in the eye, look your grandkids in the eye, and just ponder on the world they're going to live in all their life virtually, if this thing reaches fruition.
and then tell me that there's nothing you can do or there's nothing you were prepared to do
for this to be challenged.
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to A&R Conversations.
My name is Wayne Crouch.
And I'm Lisa Johnston. Tonight's guest is one that the Australian Government thought so dangerous they banned him from coming onto our soil.
And tonight we have the honour of bringing his voice to you.
Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome David Icke.
Thank you very much. Yes, I would like to be with you, where you are.
But what was his name? The immigration minister, David Coleman, sent me an email, long email, explaining why I should be banned from Australia in 2019, even though his immigration department had given me a speaking visa about six months earlier.
So it must have been something I said.
I do hope so. We definitely would have loved to have had you here in person, but unfortunately since that was never going to be allowed by the Australian Government and this is the only way we had this opportunity, we're more than grateful to be able to take it.
Yeah, no problem. So have you ever had this much trouble getting into a country before when it comes to speaking arrangements?
Oh, yeah.
I have trouble speaking in my own country.
I was asked to...
To speak and do a Q&A public event in Glasgow on July the 1st, coming up.
And I didn't organise it.
It was organised by someone in Scotland.
And they made the mistake.
You'd call it a mistake. It wasn't really a mistake.
It was doing what you would normally do.
But when you're dealing with me, it was a mistake.
And that was to make the venue public.
So the venue was called, as usual, it was lied to, as usual, by fascists who...
Think that they have the right to say what they like, but anyone who disagrees with them doesn't.
And the venue pulled the event.
So it's not going to happen now on July the 1st.
I think they're going to try and find a new venue at another point.
But this has been going on with me for, well, since the 90s.
Efforts to shut down my events in Britain.
And I think it was...
60 odd venues, maybe more, that my son Jamie contacted in Germany about, what would it be, 2018 time, for me to speak.
And everyone turned it down.
And those who didn't turn it down immediately were then called by the usual suspects, lied to, as usual, and they then dropped the...
Drop the event and invariably almost every time we find out the event has been cancelled because the media tell us or report it, not because the venues actually have the decency to come on to us.
This is how easy it is to destroy freedom of speech.
Same in Canada. Real big problems in Canada getting to speak for the same reason.
And this comes down in the end to a very simple situation that it's not the people Trying to silence you.
That silence you.
They can call venues, and they can lie, and they can do all that they do.
But what cancels you is the venue saying, okay, we're not going to have him speak here.
And the reason they do that, well, one reason is they believe the lies, and Another reason is they're told if they don't immediately cancel when the lies are pervaded, well, we're going to have a boycott of your venue, we're going to be protesting outside and all that stuff.
And if the venue hasn't caved to the first level of it, it caves invariably to the second level of it.
And what the venue owners and the venue management are saying is, we're going to make a judgment here,
not on what's right for freedom, not on what's right for the freedom of society.
We're gonna make a decision based on what we think suits us or what's best for us.
How does this affect me?
That's the great question that people ask, which is such a destroyer of freedom.
How does this affect me?
Well, how about how it affects the society in general?
How about the way it affects freedom in general?
No, no, those things are not taken into account.
It's how does this affect me?
So they go, okay, well, okay, we're going to have this event and there'll be people coming and all that, and that's good for us, but...
If we look at the effect on us, it's probably going to be better if we cancel because we don't want to hassle from these people.
And it's that lack of backbone and lack of actually caring about freedom.
People, you know, they don't want to come out and say they don't care about freedom or, you know, I'm not really bothered about freedom.
They don't want to say that because it's bad virtue signaling.
But that's how they act.
They act as if it doesn't matter.
So they'll cancel an event and destroy someone's ability to speak.
And freedom of speech is the freedom to speak.
It's not the freedom to speak in ways that others agree with.
It's the freedom to speak.
And if everyone doesn't have the right to freedom of speech, then no one does.
No one does. Everyone's kidding themselves if they support any kind of speech censorship that at the same time they say they support freedom.
They don't. They don't.
Because... Anyone who's denied the right to their opinion, anyone else beyond that, is not having freedom of speech.
They're having the freedom to speak within the parameters that some authority is deciding is allowed for them to speak within.
And then they take it a step further forward and they actually give you a free speech area where you're allowed to have those free speech moments that you're allowed to have.
Away from everything.
Where you can't actually communicate with anybody.
Yes, absolutely. Where no one sees.
Yeah, free speech zone is the classic inversion of freedom and freedom of speech.
Planet Earth is the free speech zone.
Not some little part of it that keeps any criticism or challenge out of the public eye.
So in the end, you know, and I say this about what I call this global cult, this global network of secret societies with this interlocking central leadership that orchestrates this global dystopia that's unfolding so fast.
We can point the finger at them.
My God, I have. And say, this is who it is.
This is why they're doing it.
This is how they're doing it.
Yeah. But it's the same thing as some guy ringing that venue and saying, you know, this guy's going to say this, that, and the other, when I'm not.
It's not the people who want to do it, because they're always the few, that is the problem.
It's the masses acquiescing to the few doing it that allows it to happen.
Fascism is not brought in by fascists.
There's never enough of them. Fascism is brought in by the population acquiescing to fascism.
Same with communism, same with any tyranny.
This technocracy now that they're bringing in, this new technological version of fascism.
Of fascism, communism, tyranny.
It's only happening because the mass of people are allowing it to happen.
And so you've only got to look at the mathematics to confirm that that's true.
You have pretty much now 8 billion people.
And the core of the core of the core of this cult, you'd probably get into a single room.
In fact, you would. So people keep saying, what's the solution?
Well, it's staring us in the bloody face.
Get yourself a calculator.
Press a few numbers.
Take the number of people in full knowledge of what they're doing away from the global population and see how many are left, virtually the entirety of the global population.
That's why I can't understand how we got to this point.
I mean, why is it that the majority of the global population is willing to just listen to Big Pharma, listen to the government, listen to the media and just bend a knee?
It's also influencers as well, online influencers on social media that have their followings that encourage people down there.
Well, they've certainly played their role. Yeah, yeah, but again, again, you know, we can keep externalising The problem and externalising the cause.
But in the end, why have some of us not been influenced by these characters?
And yet great numbers have.
Well, personally, myself, because I listen to people like yourself and Alex Jones, and because I read books like 1984 when I was growing up, I mean, I had people in my ear, but honestly, I think I still would have saw it anyway.
I really, honestly, I don't understand.
What you've done is taken responsibility for your own perceptions, right?
When you take responsibility for your own perceptions, you decide what you believe.
So you are individually and uniquely forming your own perceptions of reality in the world.
So you've taken your power to yourself.
Most people, because it's all down to perception in the end, you control perception, you control behavior.
That's why perception is the psychological target of this cult in many and various endless ways.
But most people don't.
They look to others to give them their perceptions.
So when you say to people, why do you believe that?
And invariably they won't be able to tell you unless it's sort of...
I heard it on the news or something.
I read it in the paper.
They won't be able to explain where that actually came from.
Well, I saw a doctor on telly saying that Covid's this and Covid's that.
Well, yeah. Have you ever seen a doctor on television saying the opposite?
Well, no, of course not.
So it must be true.
How about that any doctor that's challenging the official COVID story will never get on the television and that's why you never hear from them?
But it's this naivety, this childlike naivety Where it's like people look to mummy and daddy authority to tell them what to think and to tell them what they do.
You know, I saw this, it was like a joke card, called cartoon, really.
And there's all these sheep in this cocktail party and they're standing there with a...
Glass in their oaks or whatever.
And in the background, the sheepdog's just walking through the door and one of them says to the other, oh, thank goodness, now we'll know what to do.
Right? And that's what it's like.
What are they saying?
What's authority saying?
What are you thinking?
You know, take responsibility for your own perceptions.
Because if you don't and you give it away, then authority will use the Illusion of your perception to control you.
And that's what's going on.
If you look at the COVID thing, the COVID thing was so...
It brought everything to the surface and put it in front of your face.
Honestly, I thought that they were inept and that they were really not as good at their job as what they are until COVID came about and I actually saw how professionally programmed everything was from the beginning to the end.
I mean, they really...
They did an amazing job.
Hats off to the globalists.
Because COVID, of course, was a virus of the mind, is a virus of the mind.
It's not a virus of anything else, a virus of the mind.
The whole thing's been a psychological operation, a style.
If you look at perception and COVID, billions of people meekly went under house arrest because authority told them there was a dangerous virus that threatened their lives and threatened their families' lives.
Add to that a little bit of theatre from China.
Yeah, yeah. So their perception that there was a deadly virus, which overwhelmingly was unquestioned, well, hold on a minute, where's the proof of this?
They instead believed it, and as a result of that perceptual belief, they went under house arrest.
And there were others, the very few at the time, that looked at this and said, hold on a minute, this doesn't make sense at all.
And they didn't go under house arrest.
They refused to cooperate with what was going on.
So perception is the key.
This cult knows that.
That's why perception is its target, first, second, and last.
So because they've got so much control now of the psyche of so many people, A lot of people have woken up from it, of course, which is very encouraging, but still the great majority are just like a software program.
An authority presses enter and they respond to input.
So we've seen this seamless move from the COVID hoax narrative and the response to it into the Ukraine situation.
It's a hoax narrative. It's not a hoax in terms of there is an invasion, but it's a hoax in terms of the background to it and what's really happening and why.
But people just moved.
Okay, I'm pointing my chest down now and I'm going to get my Ukraine flag.
There you go. It's all just a psychological operation.
Virtue signaling from one thing to the next to the next to the next.
Yeah, because once they get control of your mind, They don't just get control of your mind about COVID. They get control of your mind.
And then they can move it in any direction they want.
So in a sense, what you're saying is a lot of these people aren't even having their own thoughts.
Oh God, absolutely not.
No, no. That would be a start.
Having your own thoughts.
Because to have your own thoughts, to be sovereign in your own perception, perceptual sovereignty, that's what we need, is to think for yourself.
And to think for yourself is not to be told what to think by the media that is owned by the same people that own the World Health Organization and all the rest of it.
And it's not to be told what to think by a teacher, if you're a kid, or told what to think by a politician.
It's to look at all the information available and then form your own opinion from that.
And that's thinking for yourself.
That's sovereign perception.
And what we call that is awakening.
But awakening to what?
Awakening to what we were meant to be all along.
Sovereign perceptual people.
Individual people making their individual unique view and spin of the world.
That's what we're meant to be.
That's how information flows around and we learn from each other.
But of course, you don't want free-thinking, open-minded people who are willing to go into other areas and question what they're told.
You don't want that. That's your worst nightmare.
You want uniformity.
And if you look at...
Any tyranny, the foundation is uniformity.
Uniformity of everything.
And the key uniformity is uniformity of information.
So everyone gets the same information which is designed to produce the same perception and anything that is information evidence that is challenging that desired perception It's censored.
That's what happens in every tyranny.
The first casualty of war is information.
The first casualty of tyranny is information.
And what we've had over human history is we've had your Soviet Russia, we've had your fascism, we've had your Chinese communism.
And we've had them in certain areas of the world, certain countries, certain regions sometimes.
But what we're looking at now is the global version of that being played out.
The global version of controlling all information so that anything that questions it is silenced.
And thus the information then, because that's all people have ever heard, is this.
Then becomes the perceptions that this cult is looking for.
So you will have had the same experience we all have, where someone will say to you, they'll say things like, I'll tell you what I think's going on.
And what will come out of their mouth will be the official version of whatever they're talking about.
And so when you say, well, hold on a minute.
Did you know this?
Did you know that?
Did you know that? No, I never knew that.
That can't be true. It is true.
I can show you it's true. I can prove to you it's true.
Did you know that? No, I never knew that.
Why didn't you know that? Because the only sources of information that you were going to to form that perception, which you say is your own, but it's not, were mainstream sources who were all telling the same story.
So, again, we keep coming back to the same thing.
We have to take responsibility for our own perceptions.
And if we don't, there'll be someone else's perceptions with a very, very sinister agenda and desire for why we should have them.
And so...
Everything's an inversion.
This cult works on inversion.
It's satanic in nature, and look at Satanism.
Look at its symbolism.
It's the inverted pentagram.
It's the inverted cross.
It's the inverted everything.
They invert, turn on its head, everything.
And so when they tell you it's black, you know it's white.
When they tell you it's white, you know it's black.
And it's incredible when you just work on that simple premise.
Whatever they tell us is an inversion of the truth.
It's amazing how the truth is now staring you in the face if you invert what they say.
But to do that, you've got to want truth.
To have sovereign perceptions.
And most people don't.
They just want to be part of the herd.
They just want to be part of the group.
You know, how many people and some are part of the group because they just don't think for themselves and others are part of the group because they're terrified of not being.
It hits you like lightning.
It's a painful transition.
Yeah, so that leaves one group of people one group of people only that ever turn around tyrannies.
And they're the people that see through it and won't cooperate with it.
They're the ones that do it.
The other two groups, those that just do it without question and believe it without question, are those who really would rather not do it or believe it, but what are the consequences for me of not doing and believing it?
Those two groups, they're the ones that allow tyranny to prevail.
Because they're the ones that acquiesce to it.
And it's the small group every time it's the small group.
Let's say, the smallest group, let's say, I can see it and I'm not having it.
And, you know, all revolutions to overturn tyranny, if you like, have all been generated and driven by this group, this third group.
And the others may come along in the end, you know, oh yeah, yeah, revolution, yeah, we can stop this.
Where were you when all this started?
Well, I was supporting the government.
Yeah, exactly. This is what I've been saying from the absolute start.
If the 95% of the people who we've been fighting for as the 5% fought as hard for us for one day as we have for the last three years, we'd have won this already.
Yeah, this is where perception comes in.
Two perceptions.
One, Believing, for instance, in this case, there's a deadly virus, so I need protection.
And two, fear of challenging or not obeying authority.
They're the two perceptions that hold people in servitude.
Because mathematically, it's impossible.
Mathematically. So if you take Australia, you take the population of Australia, and then you take the number of people who were imposing the fascist restrictions in Australia.
You look at Victoria, you see this moronic, moronic man, Daniel Andrews.
The cult said through him, but he said officially, this is what's going to happen.
So what if a great percentage of the population just said we're not doing it?
What do you mean lockdown? We're not locking down.
We're going out. We're going down the park.
Right? Now, very soon, it's over.
Because it's unenforceable.
There's not enough people in uniform and there's not enough sycophants in government to impose their will upon the population if enough of the population say, we're not having it.
And, you know, I look around the world and there were so many areas, so many places where that wasn't happening.
And the vast majority of places where that wasn't happening.
It's like a lot of them have just lost their will.
Yeah, we come back to these two perceptions.
Believing the government without question, fearing not doing what the government says.
Those two perceptions were entirely responsible for the population meekly acquiescing to these morons and fascists.
And, you know, people say, what's the solution?
Well, I'll tell you what the solution is.
It's stop doing it!
Stop believing what these people are telling you with their whole history of lying to you, day after day, week after week, year after year.
Don't believe what they say without question and researching it.
Demand the evidence.
Not the statement. Demand the evidence that what they're telling you is true.
They won't produce it because it's not true.
Well, they can't. For goodness sake, grow a pair, you know, form a backbone, the other group, the second group, and if you don't want to do it and you don't believe what you're being told is true, then don't do it!
Don't acquiesce to it!
It's simple as that.
It really is. It's a numbers game.
We have to become ungovernable.
When you're ungovernable, you can't be governed.
It's as simple as that. And while you're willing to be governed, this is what they're going to do while they're governing over us.
Yeah. I mean, you know, what should a government be?
It should be an organizational operation.
It should be a facilitator of freedom and a facilitator of organization.
That's what it's been sold to us as.
Of the people, for the people.
Yeah, it never was, though. Because what happened, I mean, I've written about this in the books at length over the years.
This global cult operated for a very long time through royal families, through particular bloodline families that are called royal.
And there came a point where humanity had grown up enough, matured enough, To start to reject having leaders that were...
We haven't done that in Britain and Australia yet, but maybe not so long from now.
That were chosen purely on who had sex with who in what order.
That's why we have a head of state, you have a head of state with the Queen.
Who had sex with who in what order?
In a particular family, right?
Because this is a free country, of course.
They start to reject that.
And so this cult went into a transitional period because it was starting to lose its ability to just put people in power and get them to do what they wanted.
So they created this illusion called freedom and politics.
And they created a party political system which was designed to hide the fact That it wasn't democratic and it wasn't freedom, then they just went on controlling it.
And it kind of works like this.
You control the hierarchies of any party that has a chance of forming a government, say party A and party B. And as people come into this party, maybe they join as a member and then they want to run for being a member of parliament.
Well, if you're going to be a member of parliament, you've got to go through the vetting process where they decide if they're going to select you to run for parliament or not.
And to get that through that vetting process and get the nomination, you have got to have the views that the party, i.e.
the hierarchy of the party, It says you must have.
And then as you, maybe you get in, and if you want to rise up the ranks of the hierarchy, you want to be a minister or whatever, you then have to again abide by the The desired perception and desired statements, desired so-called beliefs that the party hierarchy has, otherwise you're not going to get selected to be a minister.
You've got to be a sycophant to the party hierarchy.
And then you get a party, therefore, that is controlled, pyramidal style, by a tiny few at the top.
That's party A. Then you get party B, exactly the same principle.
They say slightly different things, increasingly not different at all.
Not even in rhetoric. And you have the same thing with a hierarchy at the top of that party that's dictating everything in that party.
Then these two hierarchies of party A and party B, they answer to the same masters.
That's exactly what we were talking about yesterday.
It gives you the illusion of choice so that you think that you've got a choice between the two when they're both answering to the one at the top anyway.
So it's just a way of the one at the top keeping that power but making you think that you've actually had the choice to choose.
Yeah. I mean, it's...
It's a case of one-party states masquerading as political choice.
And this is very easy to see.
I mean, it's all on public display, but people live their lives, and so many like that, they just don't go, hold on a minute, let's have a look at this again.
You vote for party A, because it's normally two parties that have a chance to form the government, sometimes three in a coalition, but mostly two.
So you vote for party A and they get in and you don't like what they've done because they've not done what they said they'd do.
Because party manifestos and election programs have no backing in law.
so they can tell you whatever they like during an election and then do the opposite when they get in power because that's just to get elected and if you made it a law they couldn't lie to you then um we'd have very different conversations with our politicians or that there were certain things they had to do or not do you know if if they got in the government uh and so You voted for party A, and now you don't like what they do.
So, another election.
What am I going to do now? Well, I'm going to vote for party B. Bloody fed up of party A. So, party B get in, and you don't like what they do, because they're controlled by the same hierarchy, ultimately, so they're going to basically do what the other party did.
And so you think, well, what do I do now when you get to the next election?
And you think, well, the only way of getting this lot out is to go back to party A. And this is called political choice.
Do you know, I was in Ukraine, appropriately.
In 2010, and they'd had a revolution, the Orange Revolution in 2004, to get rid of a guy called Yanukovych for corruption or whatever they claimed.
It was externally manipulated, of course.
Another regime change. Another guy came in, and who was the kind of, you know, Leader of the revolution, if you like.
Oh, we'll have him in. Well, when he got into power, nothing much changed.
So they get to the next election after the revolution.
And they say, well, we don't want him.
We've got to get rid of him. So who do we go to now?
Ah, well, Yanukovych.
You know that guy you threw out in the Orange Revolution, yeah?
Well, he's still leader of the other party.
So they voted back in the guy they threw out in 2004.
Absolute madness. And then they throw an external coup again.
They throw him out again.
And he goes off to Russia, but he still is.
It's madness.
It's like everything.
The truth is on public display.
You've just got to see it.
And you see it by coming out from the blinkered view of the world.
Oh, the BBC said, well, it must be a bloody lie then, mate.
And you look at the panorama and you look at how things connect.
And you see the nonsense of it.
The nonsense of it.
We have a Prime Minister in Britain who's just barely won a confidence vote over having parties in 10 Downing Street while the rest...
Never saw that coming. I'll admit, I didn't see that coming.
Yeah, but this is the thing.
There's this furore.
Oh, John said he had a party when everybody else was going to...
Oh, it's terrible.
Should he stand down? Okay.
I'll tell you why he should stand down.
And everybody connected to him in that government and his health network is because the British government, and the British government is not alone, but it's an absolutely provable fact that the British government has mass murdered on their watch...
In a cold calculated way, thousands and thousands and thousands of people, by putting them on death protocols, using drugs like midazolam, a sedative drug that's used in the execution process by a number of American states.
Literally used for executions.
Literally, yes.
And they've been giving...
This is provable fact.
This is not out of the ether. This is the data that's there to be seen, official data.
They, under Johnson, and under the then health minister, contradiction in terms, called Matt Hancock, they ordered the entire stock of midazolam from France.
To add to their own. And then they prescribed it in the spring of 2020, April 2020, in unprecedented amounts.
All of it in the documentation.
And thousands of people died.
And they called that the first wave of COVID. Because they needed...
Well, there's an agenda for old people anyway, but they needed to frighten people into acquiescence and lockdown.
And so they needed something that appeared to show that this COVID was lethal.
So if you remember, same in America and New York and other places, The first people who were said to have been killed in large numbers by COVID were old people.
They were old people in care homes, they were old people in hospitals, and they were being murdered by this midazolam.
Not just midazolam and morphine, that was the killer.
At the same time that that was given to them, The food was withdrawn and treatment for whatever they had was withdrawn and they were made to die.
And at the same period, I'm sure it would have been the same in Australia.
I was going to say we had exactly the same conversation with somebody else here.
They had their original treatments, diabetes, things like that weren't being treated and they were basically just being vented or hit with remdesivir or midazolam.
Yeah, remdesivir, another death sentence drug foisted on American doctors by Fauci, of course, A mass murderer in his career on a scale that just, well, it's almost beyond belief how many people's lives that guy's been responsible for, including so many who died apparently of AIDS when they actually died from a thing called AZT, which was the drug given for AIDS that was killing people as a matter of course.
But the mass murder Was to give the impression that there actually was a COVID and it was dangerous.
And so all these old people were sacrificed using these protocols, death protocols.
And if you remember, at the same time...
Certainly in Britain, they were handing out do not resuscitate orders to the same people, like Confetti, and not just old people, but disabled people, etc.
So that when they needed resuscitation because of the stuff they were put on, they weren't going to get it.
And thirdly, which kind of completed the cycle, if you like, because of COVID, ooh, so dangerous, loved ones weren't allowed to visit.
So there was absolutely no one watching the back of these people.
They had no chance.
And I'll tell you a quick story of a lady in Britain who actually was a professional nurse.
Her husband went into the hospital.
And, of course, this story could be repeated so many times.
He went into the hospital with a non-life-threatening problem.
And they put him on the megazolam morphine death pathway.
They were killing him. At the same time they did this, before he died, because they did kill him, They removed his food for 11 days.
11 full days.
No food. And this guy tried to escape from the hospital four times to save his own life.
And after the last time, he was made to be naked in bed permanently so that he couldn't do it again.
Now, if I was telling you...
That's not deprivation of human liberties.
I don't know what is. Yeah, if I was telling that story about the Nazis or the Chinese insanity, then they'd say, oh yeah, well, I can believe that.
No, no. This is the National Health Service in Britain.
These are the health services of countries around the world.
And you have this...
You have this psychological state that so many in so-called healthcare have fallen into.
Not all of them. You know, there have been people who have bravely spoken out.
But they have this...
It reminds me...
Remember those experiments they did?
Where they would kid someone that if they pressed a button, then someone they couldn't see but they could hear got a big electric shock.
I can't remember the actual name of the experiment.
It was someone in a white coat, authority, authority.
So authority said press the button.
It's an experiment.
And they would press the button, and when they did, someone would scream at the top of their voice, out of sight.
And they thought they'd given them an electric shock.
And then they would say, well, just do this again.
We're just going to make it a bit more this time.
And they would do that.
And it's like, if authority says it, you do it, and you don't question it.
And that's what's happened.
In the health services and among health professionals on a vast scale, you know you are killing people with remdesivir and morphine and midazolam.
You know you're killing them.
But you do it anyway.
Because that's what you're told to do.
And it is a mind program.
and also underpinning that is well if you don't do it that's the end of your career as people have found who did speak out so um again yes we should point the finger quite right at those that ordered it but those who did it because they were ordered to do it are the ones that physically took these people out on a vast scale So they are not just accessories to mass murder, they are The tool, the weapon that was used.
The same thing was done with the nurses back in the 1940s in Germany.
A lot of people don't even, well, they just didn't care to learn, but the nurses were literally used in the hospitals to inject the infirm with a lethal dose of the drug to kill them, to get rid of them, elderly and the infirm.
And then you look at what's happening now.
They target the nursing homes.
They target people.
Pretty much that are disabled but aren't capable of making those decisions for themselves.
I mean, I've seen people with things like bipolar disorder and things that you know aren't capable of making life-altering decisions being told that, no, it's fine, you can decide whether or not you want to go and have this mRNA shot put into your brain.
It's like, it's the same thing.
They target it and then they go for you, is what they go for.
And that's what we've been waiting for.
And I think the only reason they haven't gone and kicked all of our doors in and dragged the people like myself and Lisa and the ones that have spoken out and the other people who decided not to get the injection for whatever other reason.
I think the only reason they haven't come and dragged us all out is because the Americans are sitting there watching what's going on here in their arm.
Yeah, well, you see, that's another thing, you see.
The black and white way that people see everything when the truth is invariably a shade of grey.
So what we have, and I did see an absolute, well, I think it's a disgusting story anyway, which is the American, the United States football team wearing some bloody orange, I think it was, symbol on their arm, on their shirt when they're playing the game.
Which symbolized the need for gun control.
The politicization of sport now is disgusting.
You've seen it in Australia with the tennis.
Absolute disgrace.
It was an embarrassment. As an Australian, I was embarrassed.
It's the same with Wimbledon and Russian players.
I mean, the politicization of sport is disgusting.
But if we take the gun control thing, and of course that's what happened in Australia, then the black and white is guns bad, gun bans good.
But that's not how it is.
If people would just ask the question, Who benefits from the population having no access to weapons while the authorities are more and more and more armed to the teeth?
Who benefits from that?
They might ask why virtually every tyranny in history before it played out did gun control and banned weapons.
And, you know, I don't have a gun.
I don't want a gun. I don't like guns.
I have no interest in guns.
But if I'm on a farm somewhere in America and the police are a hell of a long way from responding, And someone comes along with a gun, then I'm completely and utterly unprotected.
And if you have a potential robber, for instance, who is looking to rob a house or whatever, or rob a farm or whatever, They would go through this um process of yeah but um okay but i wonder if they have guns or not and in america at the moment they would say what is definitely have a gun yeah that's why crime in rural areas in australia is very low because every second farm does have a gun yeah and and and you know if um if you knew That they almost certainly didn't.
Then you're going to be, obviously, that's what you're going to pick.
And the idea that someone going crazy with a gun in a school, he's not going to go crazy with a gun and not then access to a gun just because they're...
They're banned officially.
I mean, hello? Do you think these gangs that are killing each other in enormous numbers in Chicago are going to hand over their guns because the government says they're banned?
Yeah, I saw the best meme the other day.
There was a bloke with the do-rag around their head and the whole bit, and he's saying, oh, you're going to come and do the drive-by with me tonight?
And he's like, oh, sorry, it's going to take a week for me to get the clearance so that I can buy a gun.
And I just thought, yeah, that's exactly how laugh really is.
So you have a guy go crazy with a gun in a school, and often there's a lot more to know.
Which is awful! There's a lot more to know about why they go crazy with guns as well.
Yes, there are just crazy people who are just mentally ill and they do it, but there's another story with many of them.
Because, again, you ask the question, who benefits?
Who benefits from this happening?
Now, if you have an agenda to ban guns, then what you want...
Is as many mass killings, shootings, as you can have.
And so we had this grotesque sight of 19 children and two teachers being killed in this Texas school.
And the President of the United States, well he's not really accepting the name, this corrupt moron, Biden, uses his speech immediately afterwards.
To push his gun ban agenda.
And all the media join in.
And every time there is a mass shooting, the ban gun agenda gets closer and closer and closer and more of it's picked off.
That always happens at opportune times.
Yeah, if they're benefiting from these mass shootings, well, maybe there's more to know about why the mass shooting happened.
Well, we know the feds have been caught setting up bombings.
We know the feds have been caught, like, pretty much creating terrorists to keep themselves in the limelight, to make themselves actually look like they're earning their paycheck.
Well, actually, Adam Curry and John C. Dvorak of the No Agenda show call it the six-week cycle, because pretty much every five to six weeks, there's something in the news with the FBI to keep them relevant.
And I'm not saying that the FBI is involved with this one, or that they were in his ear programming the child, but if you look at past events, one can only wonder.
Well, for me, as someone who's kind of researched this now for 32 years, when something like that's happened, that's my first question.
That's the first thing to resolve.
Did this kid just do it because he's mentally ill, naturally mentally ill?
Or has he been programmed to be mentally ill and do it?
Because, you know, I've researched some of these things going way back, going back to Sahan Sahan, who's supposed to have shot Bobby Kennedy in the 1960s.
And there's no way that he did.
He was under my control.
Someone else shot him, a guy called Eugene Caesar, who's a security guard who was hired just for that day.
That's who killed him, if you look at it.
And so you've got the family, the Kennedy family, who they don't believe that Sahan Sahan killed Bobby Kennedy.
You've got the family of Martin Luther King.
They don't believe that James Earl Ray killed Martin Luther King because he didn't.
I don't believe that for a minute.
There is a whole precedence of shootings and assassinations that clearly some level of authority has been involved in making happen.
They always seem to benefit the deep state in one way or another.
Same with the Kennedy assassination.
And in fact, you know, the Kennedy assassination actually spawned the term conspiracy theory.
A lot of people don't realise this.
The term conspiracy theory and conspiracy theorists came into widespread use when the CIA, you can see the document on the internet still, if it's still there, contacted major media organizations in America in the 1960s when there was a bit of traction starting to happen on people questioning the Kennedy assassination, which of course makes no sense.
I mean, you need to change the laws of physics to make sense.
And so they urged these media organisations to use the term conspiracy theory and conspiracy theorists to discredit those who were questioning the Kennedy assassination, and then it became into wider and wider use.
So when people say, oh, that's a conspiracy theory, do you know where that term came from?
Oh, no, of course you don't.
You don't know anything. And by the way, there are no conspiracies there.
There's no conspiracies.
I mean, you know, the definition of a conspiracy, two or more people conspiring to bring about an end, usually illegal.
I mean, that never happens.
Do you know those laws where there are laws against conspiracy to this or to do this?
Do you know them? Do you know them? So, but it's, again, it's an unthinking...
Press enter, reflex action.
Conspiracy theory must be rubbish.
Conspiracy theorist must be rubbish, must be mad.
And it's this reflex action response.
There's no processing of information like conspiracy theory.
Okay, so let's have a look at what the guy's saying and let's see what evidence he has.
And then we'll decide if it's a theory or whether it's provable fact.
No, no. Conspiracy theory, rubbish.
And that's the press enter mind that so many people have.
And it's why it's so easy to get people to do what you want in great numbers.
Yeah. And at the moment, great numbers is 8 billion people.
Well, there are doubts if you believe the figures.
When we hear the figures of people that they tell us have actually taken up this medication, what's your view on that?
Do you believe that they're actually telling the truth there?
Have they gotten to 90% of the world?
Well, no. Nothing like.
I can give you some figures from England.
We were told when this fake vaccine was being rolled out That anti-vaxxers who weren't having the fake vaccine, you know, intelligent people, were numbered 5 million.
So this was the number given out on the media.
There was a bloke here, he calls himself a journalist because he's very self-deluded, called Andrew Neil.
I used to work for the BBC. And he's using this figure as saying, we should have sanctions against the non-vaccinated, non-vaccinated in his case, because this 5 million, they're putting everyone else at risk, actually.
What a joke. Again, inversion.
Because we see from the figures of deaths and destroyed health that actually...
They're the ones that are getting sick.
They're the ones that are filling up the hospitals.
They're the ones that are calling the ambulances and having it so that they're ramping.
Exactly. So what we now know from official figures is the number who have not had the fake vaccine at all is not 5 million.
It's 18.5 million.
Wow. Okay, so that's not even close.
Then you add on those who have had two or three and stopped and said no more.
And the number, in totality, is 30 million!
So, it's like everything.
You know, you see these psychological games that are played, and these studies that have been done, that when people are told that 80% of people believe something, then 80% of people tend to then believe that something.
Because it's like, again, it's the group mind.
It's the need to be part of a group.
Instead of having the perceptual sovereignty to say, I'm being guided with what I believe to be true, not what the bloody group believes.
It's a herd instinct.
Yeah. So you tell them there's only five million.
And, oh, well, everybody else is at it, so it must be all right.
And all these five million, you've got a smaller number that you can target.
But 18.5 million, that's actually quite a different thing then, isn't it?
And a lot of people, they talk about they've had it when they haven't had it, just because of the stigma of not having it.
Certainly not so much now as the truth comes out, but Before, there was a stigma in not having it.
I gloried in not having it.
So where do you see the next step going?
Where do you see all this going next?
I mean, it's just so hard to pick what next.
It's just one thing after another, isn't it?
They've got this monkeypox thing.
Yeah, it's one thing after another because it's a plan.
The reason I could predict all the stuff that's come is not because I've been pulling it out of the ether.
It's because there's a plan.
And therefore, if you uncover the plan You can predict the future.
It's not the future that has to happen.
It's the future that will happen if the plan is allowed to play out.
And up to this point, it has been, though they didn't get everything from COVID they wanted by, the pushback did start to turn that around and limit what they could get from it.
They got a lot, but not what they wanted.
So you have this situation where they are hitting us with machine gun fire with different aspects of this plan because they want exactly what you said.
Oh well, oh now it's this, oh now it's that, oh I wasn't worried about this.
And this is where there has been a bit of naivety I think In terms of people that have seen through the COVID thing, and they think because some of the restrictions have been rolled back, that, okay, well, we've won. It's over. This was never about COVID. COVID was a means to an end.
The end is multifaceted.
It's not just COVID. And so we are seeing...
This cult works on the process because it's clever.
It's not wise. It's bloody stupid, really.
But on the level of manipulating psychology, it's very skilled.
And so they...
They play it out like all those dominoes that are lined up in a room, and you press the first domino, and that goes down, and then eventually they all go down, because one causes the other.
So if you look at the invasion of Ukraine, which is why they don't want it to end, by the way.
Anybody want peace talks?
I mean, what do you think? Are we going to press both sides for peace talks so we can end this?
Do you care enough about the Ukrainian people for that to happen?
No, no, no. If they weren't using it as a one-for-all distract-everybody job, then that's exactly what would be happening.
We'd be at the table now for peace talks.
But they love this distraction.
Well, it's not just a distraction either, because of the dominoes.
So what they do is, and Chris Biden's such a moron, he's an open book really, Let's face it, all he is is Obama's mouth at this point, and that's when he's smart enough to actually be able to read what's been written from Obama to his mouth.
Yeah, and of course it's been written for Obama as well.
So what the...
What they did with the Ukraine invasion is they get all high and mighty.
Oh, well, you know, we've got to protect Ukraine's borders.
What about the southern border of the United States?
Do we want to protect that? Oh, no!
And so we've got to have sanctions against Ukraine, or against Russia, rather, for the invasion of Ukraine.
And the sanctions We're coldly calculatedly not targeting Russia.
They're just rhetoric. They were targeting the Western economy.
First of all, because everything's connected.
These are the dominoes. The enormous amount of fresh air conjured out of nothing money.
Trillions and trillions that, you know, homeless people, oh, we can't afford it.
COVID, oh, how much do you want?
Absolutely correct.
They could have fed every single empty mouth, put a roof over every single head on the planet with the money that they wasted to shove.
And they'll continue to do it.
They'd happily spend that money three times around.
Absolutely. But what they did, and this was all calculated, is they infused so much fresh air money into the system that they generated...
Mega inflation. That's what they want to do.
And also with the so-called sanctions on Russia, Russia turned around and they said, well, look, if gold is two grand an ounce, we're going to price it at 1600 an ounce and we're going to back our dollar with it.
So not only did they turn their dollar into a gold-backed currency, but they actually devalued every ounce of gold on the planet on the same day.
And that's why people are rushing now to get RuPaul's.
Yeah, and of course they targeted the ruble and the ruble goes up and up.
And also into this is the food, the manufactured food crisis.
Because the whole foundation of what's happening...
Is to stop people.
Lockdown was the big driver of this and now it's gone on in other areas.
To stop people having access to an independent source of income.
That's what this is about.
It's the bottom line. Because dependency equals control.
Whoever you are dependent on controls you.
And the idea is to crash the world economy.
So it's a system you could call creative destruction.
You destroy what's already there so you can replace it with something else.
And while what's already there stays there, you can't replace it with someone else.
Problem solution.
That's what they're doing.
They are dismantling the world economy to create mass dependency.
Mass dependency in being able to put food on the table, for instance, and to create a manufactured shortage of food as well.
Because what they want is to create a situation where...
Not just because of financial catastrophe, which is what they're in the midst of creating, but also through AI taking more and more jobs.
They want to come forward.
There's trials going on all over the world now.
This was in my books in the 1990s.
This was coming. They want to introduce a guaranteed income.
Universal basic income.
And this is the only way they'll ever get it.
And it will be a pittance, of course, and you only get it if you do what you're told.
If you want to challenge the government, question the government, or challenge the government, well, you're not going to get it.
Or interview David Icke.
Yeah, well, that's probably not a good idea.
But, yeah, so this is what they want.
But to force people into the basic income as the only means of survival, They have to destroy independent livelihoods.
So that's what lockdown was really about.
Of course, it has nothing to do with health.
It has to do with destroying small and medium-sized businesses, even bigger businesses that aren't cult businesses, so that the vast mega-global corporations could take over everything.
And that's what, of course, happened in lockdown.
In the COVID years, the big corporations like Amazon, etc., became massively more wealthy, and...
Bigger slice of the market.
And the others went under in great numbers.
So that's why they're doing it.
That's why they're doing it.
It's not kind of rocket science.
It's obvious if you know what the plan is.
And so the more that you can reduce the amount of food in circulation, you know that the wheat Supply is very much dependent on Ukraine and Russia.
You know the fertilizer is very much dependent on places like Russia.
And you know that if you can put sanctions on Russia with regard to oil and energy, then you are going to kind of drive that right through the economy.
Because anything that needs to be moved, which is everything...
It's going to go up in price.
So now you've got truckers in America paying phenomenal amounts now to fill their tanks, to deliver food.
At the same time...
It was $2.50 six months ago, $13 up the coast.
Yeah. Incredibly...
The same is happening in Britain.
The fuel price has gone through the roof.
And at the same time, a few other things, because it all connects...
You've got a long list now of food processing plants in America that have gone up in flames.
At least two of them have been hit by light planes to make that happen.
You then got Bill Gates, psychopath to the world.
A gopher, but a rich gopher for the cold, who's now the biggest owner of farmland in America.
You've got the Chinese government buying up big chunks of farmland in America.
They are taking control of the food chain.
To control what? Or to create what?
Dependency. Dependency equals control.
You know, they say, you know...
Get them by the belly and they'll do anything for you.
In other words, if you're the only source of them not starving, then they'll do whatever you want.
That's the idea. Create dependency.
Food and water are the two things that have been used for centuries to control people.
This is a time to To be very calm and to not kind of get caught in the panic of it.
Because once you panic you stop thinking straight.
It's to see it. See it for what it is.
And to, having done that, do whatever you think is best for you to prepare for it.
Because where we are now is only where we are now.
It's not where it's meant to go.
They want to dismantle everything.
And another part of this agenda is stopping travel.
So, again, the dominoes falling.
The more expensive they can make car travel, the fewer people are going to be travelling in cars.
The more expensive and chaotic they can make air travel, the fewer people are going to be travelling in planes.
And this is what's happening.
I mean, I know people who've been travelling into Europe from Britain in the last few days, and one of them went to the airport, Gatwick, London Gatwick, For a plane leaving at 5.30 in the morning.
They got there in the early hours, like 2.30, 3 o'clock.
The place was in absolute chaos.
There was just people everywhere.
They couldn't get flights.
The flights were being cancelled.
And my friends...
That's actually a global phenomenon at the moment too.
That's not just like over there.
Exactly. And the drive for that started with lockdown.
And also, you know, you can't be a pilot unless you have this fake vaccine.
That's also a part of this.
But You know, my friend's flight actually went eventually after a tannoy announcement to Gatwick asking if there were any crew available to pilot the flight.
That's incredible.
This crew turns up, gets in the plane and flies it off to Portugal.
So this is the madness that's going on.
It's going on in America, like you say.
I'm sure it's going on in Australia, everywhere.
And so it's problem, reaction, solution.
And it's also the Freemasonic 33rd degree motto.
Order out of chaos.
You dismantle the order you want to change through chaos and then you offer order out of the chaos the order that you want the world to be.
Which this time will be the new world order if we let it happen.
Yeah. And, you know, people in law enforcement And government administration.
They were just doing what they're told.
I know, you know, around the world, I've been writing about this for years, they've been systematically recruiting psychopaths into the law enforcement ranks because they want psychopaths and just take orders.
Not only will they take orders, they'll actually love imposing fascism on the people.
But those People in law enforcement that still have a sense of decency.
And those people in the health area that still have a sense of decency.
And in government that still have a sense of decency.
And in the media, is there anyone left with a sense of decency in the mainstream media?
Then they've got to start acting upon what they see because I say to them, just go home tonight, right, and look your kids in the eye, look your grandkids in the eye, and just ponder on the world they're going to live in all their life virtually, if this thing reaches fruition.
And then tell me that there's nothing you can do, or there's nothing you were prepared to do for this to be challenged.
You know, I couldn't do it.
I couldn't do it. No, when you know you can't stay silent, I couldn't.
You can't walk away from it.
This is why, over the years, because I've been doing this a long time, I've seen people come in this arena, this alternative arena, and I've seen them go.
And you think, what do you mean you've gone?
You know, this is for life, this.
You know, if we're going to turn this around, this is for life.
It's not, oh yeah, I've got bored of that now.
You just keep going because how can you sleep at night knowing what's coming and you're doing nothing about it?
This is the only way I can.
How do you sleep at night if you have a good idea of what's coming and you still not only do nothing about it, you walk away from doing anything about it?
Well, how do you sleep at night?
I have no idea. No, it's duty to speak up.
I mean, when you see it, you just cannot unsee it.
And it is.
It's duty to speak up.
And take responsibility, as you said.
Yeah, and it's for all of us to take responsibility.
But prime, prime, as we talked about earlier, is to take responsibility for your own perceptions.
To take responsibility for what you believe.
Beliefs shouldn't come off the shelf like a tin of beans.
They need to be honed, they need to be formed by seeking out the truth.
Not being told by someone else what it is.
Because if they're in authority, they're telling you that so you'll believe what they want you to believe, so you'll do what they want you to do.
You're just a pawn in a game if you do that.
But so many people, you know, I meet them all the time.
Oh yeah, well, I heard it on the BBC. Well, the government said, yeah, the government are bloody liars though.
The BBC is a bunch of liars, never more so than now.
I was brought up by a gentleman who was one of this country's first outlaw motorcycle members.
And bringing me up, he told me straight, he said, two things you don't trust.
The government and the law.
Because both of them are there to screw you.
And they're going to get you every chance they get.
And then during this COVID stuff, now Green, he's...
Not doing as well in his 70s as what some other people are of the same age.
You know what I mean? He's still got his marbles.
Don't get me wrong. But what I'm getting at is I come in during this COVID crap and he's sitting there glued to the TV, listening to the premiers, hanging on every single word.
And I'm like, my God, what are you doing, man?
You told me never to trust these people.
And you're sitting here hanging on every word that they've got to say, getting ready to go down to get your frigging first shot.
I mean, my God, just trying to convince him not to do that was a nightmare.
How is it that people who are so anti-authoritarian to begin with caved so easily?
That's something I'll never grasp.
I've had that conversation with quite a number of people, actually, who have said how shocked they've been, the people they thought had got it.
Have caved to it so easily.
But that's because they never got it in the first place.
You know, words are easy.
It's actions that tell you whether someone believes it or not.
And it's very easy to say the right thing.
It's much more challenging to do the right thing.
And the wheat from the chaff, the stalkers and the doers, have certainly been sifted in the last two years.
And the doers, I'm afraid, are a real minority compared with the talkers.
Yeah, that's all right. We need to multiply.
Oh, absolutely. And there's one thing I can definitely say for sure is that I'm very glad that your actions have always been accompanied by and met by your words.
I mean, from as long as I can remember this...
As far back as I've been involved in this movement, your voice has always been there the whole time, and you've never really found it.
You've always stayed on the same line.
The same with Alex.
He's never gone back on anything, really, that he's...
A couple of times he's apologised when he's gotten things wrong, but his views and his actual mindset, the same as yours, have never changed, never wavered.
And I think that was what a lot of us actually needed was And I'm sorry to put this pressure on you, but we needed that guiding, that little bit of a beacon, something that we could follow to know that what we were doing by putting all of ourselves in wasn't going to waste or being actually the wrong thing to do.
Yeah, well, I tell you, my son, Gareth, he's been looking through old videos of mine and putting them on the website, davidite.com.
Things I said in the past.
So I've heard them for the first time in ages.
And what shocks me sometimes is I'd be saying that word for word today.
Exactly. And that's exactly what I meant.
You've never changed. Authentic.
If you're uncovering a plan that exists, then the plan doesn't change, then what you say doesn't change.
Because that's what you're revealing, what the plan is for humanity.
And I think it's important too that those people who do...
Speak out in this arena.
They also make their actions fit their words.
So when this COVID thing started and the lockdowns began, I said, I'm not doing any of them.
I'm not locking down.
I'm not social distancing.
I'm not wearing a mask.
I'm not doing any tests.
I'm certainly not going to have the fake vaccine when it comes.
Because it was obvious that's where it was leading.
And I never have, you know.
I mean, I'd like to go to do some filming in France in the second half of this month.
But it means having a test for COVID. And so I won't be going.
I will not do it.
I will not compromise on it.
And, you know, people have shown me how you can do a test without even testing, take a picture of it, send it to the, you know, whatever you send it, and then in minutes you get a pass back to get into France.
And some people might say, well, what's the problem with that?
I say, well, it's not a problem if people want to do that.
I said I wouldn't do any of it and I ain't doing any of it.
I'm not compromising. So many people have tried to give me fake passes.
It's like, look, you know, it looks exactly the same.
It looks right on your phone.
I refuse to use any of it, period.
Whether it's fake, whether it's real, whether it's just, I'm not going to take part in any of it, period.
Absolutely right. Same.
I mean, people have to make their choice on that.
And what's happening in their life may affect that, of course.
But from my point of view, it's just my personal choice.
I'm not compromising on it in any way, shape or form.
I went out as many times as I chose to go out during lockdown.
I've never worn a mask.
And I've never social distanced.
If people want to walk around me, they should walk around me.
But I'm not frightened of them, so I have no need to walk around them.
I just won't do it.
But the point being, going back to how we started, would what has happened in the last two and a half years have happened?
If vast numbers of people had said, no, no, not testing, no, no, not social distancing, no, not looking down, no, it would have been unenforceable.
If we were ungovernable.
The thing about not testing, I mean, is so unbelievably important because the test, the PCR test, is not testing for a virus.
It can't say if you're sick or not.
The creator, Kerry Mullis, said that.
So, all these fake positives, which are not for a virus, they're for genetic material that people have in their bodies as a matter of course.
Junk material.
They are the reason, the foundation of the reason, why the COVID hoax was pulled off.
Because people took...
a positive with a test not testing for a virus to be a positive case of the virus and that's what what went on the the figures and if you died of any other cause within 28 days after having a test not testing for the virus Then the COVID-19 death certificate, that's how they got the deaths. The fake deaths when they died of something else.
And so the PCR test is the foundation of the whole scam.
And so by having, by cooperating and having the test, you're actually producing the fake figures that justified lockdown and justified all the restrictions and the devastation of the world economy.
Feeding the scam.
Yeah, not testing, not testing, not testing.
There would have been no COVID because COVID was the test.
That's what COVID was.
It is. It's the test which isn't testing for a virus.
Yeah, and we already know because we've seen pawpaws, animals, other various...
What an absolute joke.
I think that got him killed, to be honest.
So, I mean, I guess it wasn't quite a joke in the end, but...
I'm glad that he did that because it really did point out how farcical that test really was.
Yeah, but you have a test that's not testing for it.
It tests positive, but not for a virus.
And then they put you on a protocol that's going to kill you.
And they add your DNA to a database so that they can use it later on down the track of genetically modified weaponry.
Yeah, that's all part of it as well.
But again, you know, in the end...
We cooperate with our own destruction, we get destroyed.
We don't cooperate with it, we don't get destroyed.
The cult does.
And so it was always so.
We're in control, we just think someone else is.
So I know you had another arrangement that you had to go on to, but before we lose you here, Elon Musk.
Now, is he our saviour at this point, or is he just another one of them, like another global...
I mean, we've spoken with Errol a few times now, or a couple of times now, and he is starting to give us the impression that the man actually has a good heart and could actually be a benefit to mankind.
Well, if he has, he's stupid, right?
And I'll tell you why.
There's... There's a rule of thumb that if someone is fronting up something that is very, very, indeed fundamentally beneficial to the agenda, then the agenda owns it.
And so let's look at Elon Musk.
The agenda is for every inch of the planet to be covered in 5G, then 6G, 7G, to completely transform the level of the Earth's electromagnetic field that we are constantly interacting with.
To manipulate us Psychologically.
To allow, through the Wi-Fi field that would become what I said back in the 90s or just over the millennium, was planned to be a technological sub-reality.
And now it's got the name, the smart grid.
The idea is to put microchips into technology.
Nano microchips into people, which is what these fake mRNA vaccines are doing.
And then to use the chips inside you to connect in to the Wi-Fi field, the smart grid.
The cloud, as Ray Kurzweil calls it at Google.
Internet of things.
Yeah, the internet of things.
They want the internet of everything, which means one of the things becomes the human mind and the human body.
So who is the leader of...
Putting low orbit satellites into orbit.
Who has now got permission for tens of thousands of them to fire 5G, Wi-Fi, etc.
and 6G, 7G coming at the planet so that every inch of the planet is covered with the cloud and thus everyone is capable of being connected to the cloud.
In other words, having AI take their minds over.
Elon Musk at SpaceX.
Another agenda is that first of all they want people out of their cars but those who are in their cars still they need to be electric and of course laws are being passed now to get rid of petrol cars so they're not made anymore and this stuff with the increased fuel prices etc is all designed towards that end And the reason they want electric cars is nothing to do with the environment.
The human-caused global warming is a bigger hoax as COVID. And coming from the same people, by the way.
That's why Gates is pushing both and Suave is pushing both at the World Economic Forum.
The reason they want electric cars is they want driverless cars.
And driverless cars have to be electric.
It won't work with petrol engines, diesel engines.
So what they're doing is moving to electric cars because what they're actually doing is moving to driverless cars.
And driverless cars means that the computer in the car decides where you go, where you can go and where you can't go.
So if you're a dissident and they decide to take you to the police station...
Yeah. Or you want to go and investigate something.
And it means driving out to a place.
Well, the computer won't take you there.
Whereas you can do it with a petrol engine, just put your right foot down and away you go.
But not when the computer's deciding where you go and where you don't go.
So who is one of the global leaders in producing electric cars and driverless cars?
Well, Elon Musk.
Another agenda is to connect AI to the human brain so that AI becomes the human mind.
So they don't have to manipulate your perception anymore because you're getting them direct via AI. Well, Elon Musk came out.
I'm buying Twitter because I believe in free speech.
He came out and said, well, this AI could be the end of humanity.
Yeah, true. And then he starts a company called Neuralink to connect computers to the human brain.
Playing with monkeys at the moment.
So, like I said earlier, if he does have a good heart, then he's an idiot.
Because he's doing everything in those companies to advance this agenda.
One of the things, for me anyway, about the alternative media, it does fall for one of the big, big traps, the psychological traps, and that's believing what you want to be true.
If you want something to be true, then check it even more.
Because if you want it to be true, your door is already swinging open.
If you don't want it to be true, it's slammed shut.
Telling people what they don't want to be true is a challenge.
Telling people what they would like to be true is much easier.
And it's the same in all these areas, including the alternative media.
Musk is going to bring free speech back to Twitter and all that stuff.
People want that to be true, so they're more likely to believe it.
Me, I want to know why a guy running three companies that are fundamentally advancing the agenda of the cult...
Now wants to block another agenda of the cult which is the destruction of free speech and these are the questions that in the alternative media we need to be asking and not just naively accept something because we really would rather it be true than not be true and so I'm watching this and and now I'm seeing Musk starting to pull back and say, well, maybe I'll terminate the agreement because there's too many bots and fake accounts.
But if he does that, if he does step back and he doesn't follow it through and buy it and then free speech for everybody, and he's already backing off on that, by the way, in some of these statements, then even though he's done that he's backed off and he hasn't bought twitter he will still in the minds of many people who should know better be a defender of free speech and will be someone on the side of free speech and i'll tell you from long experience that this cult wants its agents pushing for what it wants And it wants its agents apparently opposing what it wants.
So that it can control.
Quiet in plain sight. Yeah.
This cult is not interested in controlling a football team in a match.
It's not interested.
Because there's an unknown factor at the other team.
The Colt, in football terms, wants to control both sides, and the referee...
And the crowd. It knows the crowd.
They come along with it. Yeah, good point, though.
They want to know the score before the game starts.
Because one of the things about this Colt is they are incredibly...
The people running it, they are incredibly insecure.
Because they know, however much they may...
They want to convince themselves they're all-powerful.
However, they want to convince the population they're all-powerful.
They know that actually their power is only the power the population gives to them.
And once the population stops doing that, it's over.
So their control, while apparently all-powerful, is very tenuous.
It depends on the population remaining acquiescent.
And so they are very uncomfortable in states of flux where they can't call the outcome.
That's why they want to control all sides of the referee.
And so I look upon Mr.
Musk, shall we say, with great suspicion in terms of his intent.
And like I say, if he is in some way genuine, then A... He's an idiot because he can't see that he's playing the game with his companies.
And B, there's no way that Cole would have an outsider running those companies which are so fundamental to their agenda.
You don't think that it's just that he got too big for them to actually stop from doing that?
No. These people own the financial system.
Have you noticed how many times that these companies like Tesla have got into financial trouble?
And SpaceX has got into financial trouble.
And then suddenly the financial trouble has disappeared.
The money is just found. It's just there.
And suddenly he's the world's richest man.
And suddenly, I'm going to buy Twitter.
In a blink of a bloody eye, he's raised the money.
What? What? And we shouldn't forget also that these massive, massive investment companies, like 10 trillion in assets, like BlackRock and State Street and Fidelity Investments, that place trillions of dollars into companies and therefore control them, that they have massive stakes in Musk's companies.
And they've gone along with this Blackrock, it's absolutely cult to its DNA. It's the same with the others.
It makes no sense.
Well, it doesn't matter who finances you if it comes down to that, because Blackrock sitting at the top of the pyramid finances everything on the way down.
So realistically, I mean, the whole world belongs to Blackrock.
Larry Fink is sitting on top of the world right now on a throne.
Yeah, well, the whole woke agenda through corporations, suddenly all the corporations are pushing the woke agenda, insanity agenda.
Well, have a look who the main stockholders are of those corporations.
BlackRock, Vanguard, Fidelity Investments, State Street.
They're running them. And so you go.
Population. Corporations.
People controlling corporations.
And that's where you find the people you get into a single room.
Well, we've certainly had a lot of revelations in the last 12 months that I didn't think that anybody would actually ever hear or find out about.
I mean, the fact that they're literally telling us when the Bilderberg group is meeting, I mean, that's incredible.
Like I said, I never thought I'd see that in my life.
I mean, this is a time people don't realise this is historical.
Sorry, David, I didn't mean to cut you off.
That's alright. I'll just say the Bilderberg Group is less important now.
I mean, I've been on the case of the Bilderberg Group since way back in the 1990s.
I went to where the Bilderbergers were meeting in Switzerland in the 1990s by 1995.
To see how the whole setup worked.
I went there the day before and it started and there was all preparations going and everything.
Then I went back during when it was on and I couldn't...
The police wouldn't even let you on the bloody mountain where the hotels are at the top of the mountain.
And this was a private gathering, you know.
And I said to the police guy at the checkpoint, I said, well, what's going on up there?
He said, I don't know, mate.
He said, just... It's some big meeting.
So, I mean, the compartmentalisation is fierce.
The left hand never knows what the right hand's doing, and that's what's actually got them to the point where they are so far.
Yeah. So the World Economic Forum has really superseded the Bilderberg Group.
Now, I'm not saying it's not important, but it's...
And, you know, just finally, because I've got to go and do this next thing, but...
You know...
We're at a point now where they can't hide it and they don't really want to hide it because they know they can't.
All the way through this period to present time, they've been working under the radar because they could.
But I said years ago, there's going to come a point where we're going to see it.
Because if you've been working under the radar to transform society, a completely changed society, then there comes a point where you have to do it.
And when you reach that point, people are going to look up and say, what's going on?
So at that point, this is where we are now, you stop hiding it and you start sales pitching it.
You start selling it.
So instead of hiding the fact that you're going towards AI becoming the human mind, you then start selling what a great idea it is, and that's where we are now.
You look at the World Economic Forum with its Great Reset.
These things that I've been writing about and the alternative media has been talking about through these years are now The policies of the World Economic Forum, which they, first of all, denied conspiracy theory, and now they are putting them on public display to sell them, because they know they can't hide it anymore.
Because if they're going to make it happen, then it has to happen in plain sight where people can see it.
So now they're sales pitching it.
And so it's...
It's part of the course that they would not try to hide the Bilderberg Group anymore.
Hide what's going on, yeah, but not hide in the way they did before.
I mean, when I started chasing the Bilderberg Group back in the 90s, 1990s, there was every effort to stop anyone knowing about it.
Now they're not symbolic because...
It's showtime.
It's time to make it happen.
And therefore they've got to sell it, not hide it.
Well, it's been absolutely incredible getting to actually speak to you in person.
It's incredible. It's virtual.
Like I said, we've been watching you for decades now and, you know, honestly, all I can do is thank you on behalf of mankind at this point, because at this point, people like yourself really have made an impact, not just on your country or on, you know, a few viewers.
You've literally made an impact on mankind.
So thank you very much, David Icke, for your time.
Well, that's very kind.
It's been a pleasure and, you know, We ain't finished yet.
We've only just begun.
Let's get on with it. Absolutely.
I'm going to be around a long time.
I'm not going until this is sorted.
Well, hopefully we can get you on again very soon and we'll be on the other side of all of this garbage and have taken back some kind of control of this craziness.
Maybe I'll get into Australia.
The coronavirus pandemic started in China.
Oxygen, medical supplies and physical care have been cut.
One of the five vaccines envisioned.
Stage one you create a problem.
It could be a manufactured virus.
You want a reaction and you want them to either say do something or you want them to accept what the authorities suggest must be done.
So one of the agendas is to massively cull the population.
They want to reduce the numbers.
▲
Export Selection