April 6, 2022 - David Icke
19:57
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| Welcome to my show. | |
| Welcome to my show. Well, I'm going to do a few stories at the start today relating to COVID. Remember that? | |
| And the idea that it's gone away and the whole foundation of what it sought to impose has gone away is something I strongly suggest should be avoided because it hasn't. | |
| And what we are now going through is a period when a lot of it has been rolled back and a lot of people are kind of running for the hills who were involved in the catastrophe that unfolded, trying to avoid responsibility for the catastrophe that they were fundamentally part of. | |
| But in the background, it's still bubbling away. | |
| And it's a card that has not been played for the last time. | |
| That is for sure. | |
| So I'm going to start with this story. | |
| It's an article by Professor Michael Chosudovsky. | |
| And it's looking... | |
| Well, I'll give you the headline. | |
| It says it all, really. Now, it's interesting that I read that headline. | |
| This week... When those points were being made in the spring of 2020, and I was getting a lot of abuse for making them, but now they are seen to be quite blatantly true. | |
| And again, you know, it's so important That if you believe something and you've established something to the point where you can see that actually it's valid, it's so important that we don't be intimidated or frightened into not saying it. | |
| Because otherwise what you're doing all the time is seeing things in retrospect, which a lot of the time is all you can do because the information doesn't come out at the time. | |
| But a lot of things you can see at the time. | |
| But if you stay quiet about them, it's retrospective. | |
| So it has no impact at the time. | |
| And putting that out in the spring of 2020 did have an impact on many people in the sense that they were able to look at what was happening from another perspective and not just the one being given to them by well not only the mainstream media but great chunks of the alternative media that was also buying While in a different way, much of the official narrative. | |
| So, what Chosudovsky does here is go through all the different parts of the hoax in retrospect and details why they were He talks about the central role played by the PCR test, how the entire database of COVID-19 confirmed cases is invalid because the test is invalid. | |
| He talks about fake data, how 465 million so-called confirmed COVID cases have no validity. | |
| He talks about the pandemic treaty and the QR verification code in terms of a stepping stone towards total technological control of human life. | |
| And, you know, this World Health Organization Treaty, Pandemic Treaty they're calling it, is absolutely vital to where they want to go and it's also vital to understanding what's actually happening. | |
| Because the idea is, and the idea always was, as I've said in the books, to create the World Health Organization through the Rockefellers in 1948 as part of the UN. And to make it eventually the dictator of world health response and policy. | |
| Now you've seen that happen in the years of COVID, where so much that came out of the World Health Organization, owned by Gates now on behalf of the Rockefellers, and it being followed by the vast great majority of countries in the world. | |
| But they want now to go a step further and have a full-out treaty In which that becomes agreed officially that that's what happens from now on. | |
| So whoever controls the World Health Organization controls global health policy and response. | |
| That's the game. | |
| And that's why this treaty is in train. | |
| And he talks about... | |
| An electronic ID linking everything to everything of each individual. | |
| Records of health, banking, personal and private etc. | |
| And he quotes various people like this one. | |
| A worldwide digital ID system in the making. | |
| The aim of the World Economic Forum and of all central banks is to implement a global system in which everyone's personal data will be incorporated into the central bank digital currency network. | |
| So all these things are all obviously... | |
| Connected. He talks about the fake, or indeed in this case, ridiculously low numbers of, quote, COVID-19 confirmed cases that were used to launch the claim that there was a pandemic. | |
| Where did that come through? | |
| The World Health Organization. | |
| And he says that In January 30th, 2020, there were only 83 cases in 18 countries and only seven of them had no history of travel to China. | |
| There was no scientific basis to justify the launching of a worldwide public health emergency international concern. | |
| And so it goes on. It's a fraud. | |
| There was no pandemic on March 11th, 2020. | |
| Well, yeah, all of that is true. | |
| But it's in hindsight and retrospect. | |
| The fact is that it was bloody obvious at the time it was happening. | |
| And going on from that and in this whole vein of running for the hills, it weren't me, Gov! | |
| Is this headline, why more and more experts say lockdown didn't prevent people dying of COVID and call it a monumental mistake on a global scale. | |
| That means the mistakes you made, oh no, we didn't make them. | |
| It was a simple instruction to the British people, said the Prime Minister. | |
| You must stay at home. | |
| With that sombre televised address shown on March 23rd, 2020, two years ago last week, the country was plunged into its first lockdown. | |
| After weeks of surging infections and horrified by the staggering scale of hospitalizations in Spain and Italy, all shown to have been fraudulent crises since. | |
| The government had concluded there was no option but to issue an unprecedented order to curb the growing pandemic. | |
| It was following the science after all. | |
| And so, The consequences For lockdown are now becoming absolutely obvious, and they were obvious at the time in some examples given here. | |
| The government had issued its most draconian stay at home order, a legal mandate that permitted people to leave their homes only for specific purposes, to shop for basic supplies for medical purposes, for exercise, for work, essential work. | |
| This lasted seven weeks and led to some of the most heartbreaking and damaging moments of the pandemic. | |
| Dying patients said goodbye to loved ones via a video call. | |
| Women gave birth without their partners. | |
| Mental health issues, particularly to the young, began to take root. | |
| Reports of domestic violence rose dramatically as women were trapped with their abusers. | |
| And it went on and on and on. | |
| And the death toll Never mind the psychological toll of lockdown is impossible to exaggerate. | |
| But then we come to people like this. | |
| There's a lady called Devi Sridhar. | |
| Now she was one of the big lockdown fanatics who's now somewhere in a high place among the trees. | |
| And the headline of this article is Don't Let the Lockdown Hawks Rewrite History. | |
| That's exactly what they're trying to do. | |
| The past two days have seen sorties from scientists desperate to shore up the lockdown version of history. | |
| Lockdowns were necessary and anyone who disagrees does not care about society or equality. | |
| This version of history is so fraudulent that it cannot be allowed to triumph. | |
| Writing in The Guardian yesterday, Devi Sridhar Missed Lockdown Asks, why can't some scientists just admit they were wrong about COVID? Why indeed? | |
| Shridhar notes that scientists have divided into opposing camps, taking particular pandemic positions, eventually building a base of followers that organize around the position and defend it vigorously. | |
| She just doesn't seem to recognize that this neatly describes her own approach. | |
| And she's not alone. | |
| There's loads of people doing this now. | |
| Sridhar's piece is a craven attempt to rewrite history by claiming that the zero COVID position was only ever intended for the pre-vaccine era. | |
| Can this be the same Sridhar who said in a New Statesman interview in January 2021 that the better option is to eliminate the virus even after vaccines have started to be rolled out? | |
| Or who tweeted in June 2020 that the fastest way to get economy and normal life back is to push for a zero Covid Britain. | |
| Clear virus, build domestic economy. | |
| Still, as far as Sridhar is concerned, if anyone got anything wrong, it wasn't her. | |
| And there's people going to be joining her in the high places among the trees in relation to this COVID vaccine as well, as more and more and more evidence comes to light of the devastation That it has caused to life and the health of those surviving what is in those vials. | |
| Now, you know, I mentioned about COVID not going away. | |
| We're in a stage here. | |
| And remember how it came out of China. | |
| Well, the hoax came out of China. | |
| And if you look now, it's almost like deja vu. | |
| China announces another massive lockdown. | |
| A COVID outbreak in Shanghai prompted Beijing's swift response. | |
| Some 26 million residents of China's economic capital of Shanghai will be confined to their homes as Beijing imposes a massive citywide lockdown in a bid to maintain a zero COVID policy. | |
| Now, zero COVID is insane. | |
| A, because if you haven't got a virus, and I saw another brilliant documentary this week demolishing the idea that there was one. | |
| If you haven't got a virus, then where do you get zero COVID from? | |
| You've got it anyway. But you've got a blank sheet of paper in which you can make it do whatever you bloody like, because you don't have to respond to it. | |
| Public perception has to respond to what you say is it. | |
| So to control the growing outbreak claimed, the lockdown will be accompanied by a new round of mass testing across the city. | |
| The more people you test with the test, not testing for the virus, the more cases you get. | |
| And so what's happening? | |
| Groceries will be delivered and left at checkpoints. | |
| All non-essential businesses in Shanghai will close their offices, making employees work from home. | |
| Those who can. China's authorities are free to use public health measures such as mass testing, contract tracing and lockdowns in order to stop community transmission of the virus as soon as it is detected. | |
| So it's all kicking off again in China and I saw it. | |
| South Korea was going through something similar the other day and This is Patrick Vallance in Britain, the chief scientific advisor to the government that's advised lockdown all the way through. | |
| Colt owned, this is, I wrote this headline, you'll guess. | |
| Colt owned Vallance in dire warning that COVID is evolving rapidly. | |
| We may need to ramp things up. | |
| The government's chief scientific advisor, Sir Patrick Vallance, is this dumb and dumber act with the chief medical officer of England, Christopher Whitty. | |
| Patrick Vallance has issued a dire warning that COVID is evolving rapidly, adding that measures should remain in place to be able to ramp things up again if needed. | |
| He was speaking to the Science and Technology Committee, House of Commons, and following a steep rise in COVID cases. | |
| Tested positive with a test, not testing for the virus. | |
| Sir Patrick was asked how important advice from SAGE this Lockdown supporting science group advising the government was in the proposals. | |
| The expert confirmed Sage clearly played a big part before adding his own remarks on the current situation. | |
| He said this virus has not gone away. | |
| It's not going to go away. | |
| It's going to be circulating human virus for as long as we can see forward. | |
| And it hasn't stopped evolving. | |
| It's quite an unstable period. | |
| So the virus is changing very rapidly. | |
| And it's got quite a lot of space to evolve into. | |
| Evidence for a single syllable of any of that? | |
| Sir Patrick, nil. | |
| Nil! It's not a foregone conclusion that evolution to increase growth and transmission, which is what the virus does. | |
| Evidence for that? | |
| Nil! Necessarily is associated with reduced severity. | |
| And Sir Patrick also noted that three things were essential to adopting a living with COVID approach. | |
| Being able to monitor how it evolves, make it up. | |
| To protect vulnerable both physically and through vaccines and antivirals. | |
| More and more fake vaccines killing more and more vulnerable people. | |
| And having the capacity to be able to operationally ramp things up again if you need to do that, this is crucially important. | |
| So it ain't gone away. | |
| And another thing they are increasingly needing is Is some way to explain away the consequences of their fake jabs, because they've been murdering people. | |
| These people have been murdering people around the world, these people in authority, the murder. | |
| Once you realize that fake vaccines you are telling the people to have and trying to make them mandatory even, The more you know that they're killing people and creating health-destroying-for-life health problems, then if you keep pushing them, pressing them, telling people to have them, that's murder, by any definition. | |
| The coronavirus pandemic started in China. | |
| Oxygen, medical supplies, and historical trends have continued... | |
| One of five vaccines in which... | |
| Stage one you create a problem. | |
| It could be a manufactured virus. | |
| You want a reaction and you want them to either say do something or you want them to accept what the authorities suggest must be done. | |
| So one of the agendas is to massively cull the population. | |
| They want to reduce the numbers. |
Export Selection