Feb. 7, 2022 - David Icke
25:23
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| So, so | |
| so so | |
| hello and welcome to the first dot connect the news show of 2022 | |
| The world's still just as mad, but we're just a little bit more further forward. | |
| And to be fair, in England, we did get away with Christmas and New Year without the kind of The restrictions that were imposed on Scotland and Wales and others around the world. | |
| And one of the real central reasons for that is that the government in Westminster didn't think they'd get away with it if they tried to take Christmas and New Year celebrations and parties and pubs away again. | |
| And it just shows you the power of People when they refuse to acquiesce to authority because the agenda would have been to have imposed at least the restrictions in England that have been done in Scotland and Wales, but they didn't think they could get away with it. | |
| However, of course, they'll go on trying Because the agenda is that that's what supposed to happen and we must go on not complying and making it very very difficult for them to do what they want because their worst nightmare is to say this is going to happen And the population, in enough numbers, says, we're not doing it. | |
| We're not doing that. Oh, no, no, no, no, no. | |
| We're going to go on, carry on doing it. | |
| What you say we shouldn't do. | |
| Because that will just show, not just the people of England and Britain, but the world, where the real power has always been. | |
| Not with the tiny numbers in authority, but with the massive numbers that authority seeks to impose its will upon. | |
| And so they don't want to alert people To wake up to what they shouldn't have to wake up to, which is where the real power is, by saying we are going to impose this and then they can't do it. | |
| And they've obviously made the judgment in England over Christmas and New Year that we probably won't get away with it, so we're not going to try. | |
| But like I say, they'll go on Seeking to create illusory situations which break the spirit of the population and they just go under further restrictions because either they think the situation is so bad we've got to or I can see what they're doing but I can't bring myself not to do what they tell me. | |
| And I'll start today with one of these scams to make things look like catastrophic. | |
| To that end, a symptomatic English who tests positive for COVID in a lateral flow test will no longer be able to get confirmatory PCR from January the 11th amid test shortage. | |
| See manufactured test shortage. | |
| Thousands face being quarantined with false positives. | |
| So this is how crazy The world has become. | |
| You have a lateral flow test. | |
| Well, I haven't. And you test positive. | |
| Because the lateral flow test is useless. | |
| And before, they've said, okay, you've tested positive with this useless lateral flow test, and it's so useless, we insist that you get a confirmation with a PCR test that you're positive. | |
| Now, although the PCR test is not testing for the virus, it will, in quite a significant number of cases, not test positive For the genetic material as the lateral flow test has. | |
| And so the lateral flow test positive becomes like discarded. | |
| So this is the scam. | |
| They're getting rid of the PCR confirmation. | |
| So now, every single lateral flow test that's positive is going to go down as a case. | |
| And the numbers are going to go up. | |
| Oh, look, the numbers are being overwhelmed. | |
| Follow-up PCRs for asymptomatic, nothing wrong with them, COVID sufferers who test positive on lateral flow have been scrapped in a bid to ration test. | |
| Nonsense. It's been done in a bid to do what I've just described. | |
| Previous guidance to confirm positive rapid tests with more accurate, not testing for the virus, lab results will be removed from January the 11th. | |
| And this UK Health Security Agency, part of the intelligence community now, Announced the temporary change to testing policy amid sky-high testing numbers across England and a rapidly escalating NHS staffing crisis with one in ten thought to be isolating. | |
| So what's going to happen now? | |
| Because the confirmatory PCR test, not that it's confirmatory, but at least it would say no to a significant number of lateral flow positives, That's gone, so you're going to have more lateral flow positives deemed a case, deemed to be needing to isolate, and thus your chaos is going to increase. | |
| Nothing easier to manipulate than chaos. | |
| And Under the change, people who receive a positive result of the lateral flow device will be required to self-isolate for seven days without requiring PCR confirmation. | |
| So you're going to have more people isolating, quite obviously. | |
| And this health security agency has said that while COVID rates remain high across the UK from test not testing for the virus, the vast majority of people with a positive lateral flow result can be confident they have the virus. | |
| That is an absolute lie and they know it's a lie because they're a bunch of bloody liars. | |
| So, however, the article says, with just under 1.5 million lateral flow tests being conducted across the UK every day, this could still lead to thousands of people who don't have COVID, not that a lateral flow test positive is any confirmation that they do, they'll have to isolate. | |
| And it comes at a time when services such as NHS, public transport and bin collection are struggling to cope with the weight of staff absences caused by workers having to self-isolate. | |
| Today, even some NHS leaders have joined a growing chorus of voices calling for the self-isolation period to be slashed from seven days to five to prevent services being cut back. | |
| What they're doing, you see, because if they came out with an outright, we're locking down or we're doing these restrictions, like in Scotland and Wales, I didn't think they'd get away with it in England. | |
| So they're doing it or trying to do it by stealth. | |
| And this is a new part of the scam, this dropping the PCR confirmation. | |
| And, you know, when you get out of the mainstream media and you start looking at alternative information, information from all these doctors, scientists and others who are Otherwise censored in the mainstream internet. | |
| You start to realize the scale of what's actually happening in terms of our fellow men, women and children being killed and maimed for life. | |
| Their life expectancy is shortened by having this fake vaccination. | |
| And this is an insurance CEO. Who's saying that deaths are up 40% among working age people. | |
| We are seeing right now the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business. | |
| One American CEO Scott Davidson says. | |
| He's the head of One America Insurance and he says the The data that he's found for his company is consistent across every other player company in the business. | |
| Davison said the increase in deaths represent huge, huge numbers. | |
| And that it's not elderly people who are dying, but primarily working age people, 18 to 64. | |
| You see, as the fake vaccination has been rolled out to those age groups, they're starting to die in unprecedented numbers. | |
| They are employees of companies that have group life insurance plans through One America. | |
| And what we saw just in the third quarter, we are seeing continue into the fourth quarter. | |
| And that's that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic. | |
| Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three sigma or a one in 200 year catastrophe One in 200 year catastrophe would be a 10% increase in deaths over the pre-pandemic numbers. | |
| Now, he said, we have 40% and it's just unheard of. | |
| And this, in the same period that the fake vaccination has been rolled out. | |
| Most of the claims for deaths being filed are not classified as COVID deaths, Davidson said. | |
| He said at the same time, the company is seeing an uptick in disability claims, saying first it was short-term disability claims, and now the increase is in long-term disability claims, in the same period the fake vaccine's been rolled out. | |
| For one America, we expect the cost of this are going to be well over 100 million. | |
| You've seen nothing yet, mate. | |
| And this is our smallest business, so it's having a huge impact on that, he said. | |
| And at a news conference where Davidson spoke, Brian Tabor, the president of the Indiana Hospital Association, said the extraordinarily high death rate quoted by Davidson matched what hospitals in the state are seeing. | |
| The number of hospitalizations in the state is now higher than before the COVID-19 vaccine was introduced a year ago, and in fact is higher than it has been in the last five years. | |
| I mean, talk about... | |
| The fake vaccine is the elephant in the living room. | |
| It's unbelievable. | |
| All the data, all the experience of people at the coalface of all this. | |
| And yet the media just and the politicians just ignore it. | |
| And the health psychopaths. | |
| More confirmation. This is an autopsy analysis showing 93% of post-COVID vaccination deaths are caused by the jabs. | |
| This is research conducted by Dr. | |
| Sukharat Bhakti, of course, has been a loud critic of the whole COVID narrative since the beginning. | |
| And Dr. Arne Burkhard, they looked at 15 patients deceased bodies that were deemed by coroners or public prosecutors to have been unrelated to vaccination. | |
| Now this of course is going on all the time, where it doesn't go on the death certificate that actually the vaccine was involved in the death even though they died after the vaccine was administered. | |
| And then if people push it, This is why they don't want autopsies, of course, as this research with autopsies has shown. | |
| When people push it, it's like, oh, no, no, no, it's definitely not the vaccine. | |
| So these are people who died and then the coroners or public prosecutors said, no, no, nothing to do with the vaccine. | |
| However, it turns out that of 14 of the 15 cases that they looked at, or 93%, they did actually die because of the fake vaccination and a lot of it was due to triggering the immune system to attack itself, attack its own body. | |
| According to the studies, all of the individuals died between seven days and six months post-injection. | |
| Their ages ranged from 28 all the way up to 95. | |
| The most attacked organ was the heart. | |
| But other organs were involved as well. | |
| The implications are potentially enormous, resulting in millions of deaths. | |
| And the paper, which is titled On COVID Vaccines, Why They Cannot Work and Irrefutable Evidence of Their Causative Role in Deaths After Vaccination, has gained widespread attention online while being ignored by the mainstream, of course. | |
| The findings of the paper reveal the true danger and risks of the fake vaccines, which governments, the medical community and scientists alike continue to sweep under the rug. | |
| In all 14 of the vaccine-caused deaths, researchers observed the same underlying health issues. | |
| And the conclusion of the paper is that this histopathologic analysis shows clear evidence of vaccine-induced autoimmune-like pathology in multiple organs, that myriad adverse events deriving from such auto-attack processes must be expected to be very frequently Occurring in all individuals, particularly following booster injections, and that is self-evident. | |
| Beyond doubt, injection of gene-based COVID-19 vaccines places lives under threat of illness and death. | |
| We note both mRNA and vector-based vaccines are represented among these cases as are all four major manufacturers. | |
| And while that's happening, The Food and Drug Administration in America approves booster injections for a new age category. | |
| Because, as I say, the pharmaceutical cartel, Big Pharma, and the regulatory agencies that are supposed to protect us from Big Pharma are controlled by the same people. | |
| So you know they're going to get permission no matter what is found. | |
| In terms of evidence that these things should be stopped. | |
| Use of Pfizer's booster jab has been expanded to children aged between 12 and 15. | |
| In the United States, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA, has expanded the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID booster use to teenagers and cut the time between the primary vaccination and the boosting dose from six to five months. | |
| So what they do is to say, oh, yeah, so when you have this one, then you've got to go six months before you have this one. | |
| They go, OK, because that's the science. | |
| Yeah. And then they say, well, actually, we need to get this stuff into them quicker. | |
| You know what I mean? Before they suss in large enough numbers what we're actually doing, killing them, maiming them. | |
| So now we'll make it five months. | |
| And so what happened to the science? | |
| Oh, well, exactly. | |
| So, according to the guidance, protective health benefits against coronavirus and its consequences outweigh the potential risks of a vaccine. | |
| I mean, it's so ridiculous. | |
| You just have to chuckle sometimes. | |
| Prior to coming to this conclusion, the FDA analyzed real-world data from Israel. | |
| Where boosters for this age category were approved at the end of November. | |
| And there you go. | |
| It's just extraordinary. | |
| And the psychopathy necessary to put this stuff into kids, given what it's doing to people. | |
| Is almost unimaginable. | |
| And in Ireland, parents can now register children aged 5 to 11 for a COVID-19 fake vaccine. | |
| The rollout is set to begin imminently. | |
| Clinical trials showed that this vaccine, this is the HSE, the health people in Ireland. | |
| Clinical trials showed that this vaccine was highly effective at preventing COVID-19 in children. | |
| That is an absolute lie. | |
| It obviously doesn't. | |
| How can you... | |
| How can you say that this fake vaccine doesn't stop transmission or doesn't stop you getting infected and then say, what do they say here again? | |
| They say clinical trials showed that the vaccine was highly effective in preventing COVID-19 in children. | |
| You've just admitted that it isn't. | |
| Hospital admissions of children with eating disorders surged 70% since the pandemic. | |
| So you are looking at the psychological devastation of young people as well as putting this shite into their arms. | |
| Evermore frequently. | |
| You know, where the hell are the bloody parents? | |
| I mean, there's some genuine parents, some intelligent parents who are not having it, but where are the rest of them? | |
| Well, this is done to their kids. | |
| Oh, the other thing is that they're now saying that kids in England need to wear face masks in schools, as they're doing, you know, in a lot of other places. | |
| And it's reported in the media that, oh yes, the government's now said that children have to wear face nappies in school. | |
| But it turns out that that is not the case in terms of the law. | |
| Not that it should matter whether it's law or not. | |
| You just don't bloody do it. Don't let your kids suffer it. | |
| But this is the headline. Wearing face masks in school classrooms is not a requirement, government guidance shows. | |
| They just kind of missed that. | |
| Despite widespread reports that masks are to be required in classrooms as pupils return to schools across the country, the updated government guidance shows that this is only a recommendation, not a requirement. | |
| Here is the relevant section. | |
| Where pupils in year 7, which would be children who were 11 on August 31st, 2021, and above are educated, we recommend that face covering should be worn by pupil staff and adult visitors when moving around the premises outside of classrooms, such as in the corridors, communal areas. | |
| This will be a temporary measure. | |
| This will be a measure for as long as we think we can get away with it. | |
| From January the 4th, we also recommend Those in schools where pupils in year 7 and above are educated face coverings should be worn in the classrooms. | |
| This does not apply in situations where wearing a face covering would impact on the ability to take part in the exercise or strenuous activity. | |
| So when you're sitting there quietly in the classroom just getting on with it, then you've got to wear a mask then. | |
| But when you're doing activity and you're blasting out and breathing heavily, then that's okay. | |
| And, of course, to wear a mask when you're doing that activity would be very dangerous, but that's what they're doing in many countries, insisting on that. | |
| So, so many of these so-called laws, like I say, it shouldn't matter. | |
| You know, this is ridiculous. | |
| My kid's not doing it. | |
| I'm not having it done to my children. | |
| But so much that people think is the law, it's not the law at all. | |
| It's a government recommendation. | |
| I mean, this moronic guy, Mark Drakeford in Wales, the first minister in Wales, was caught on a hot mic, saying, I hope they don't ask questions about, basically, is it the law or is it a recommendation? | |
| They know what they're doing. | |
| And the fear porn continues. | |
| Covid warning as new variant with 46 mutations. | |
| Oh dear, that sounds scary. | |
| Infects 12 in southern France. | |
| Scientists have rung the alarm bells over the emergence of a new variant in southern France. | |
| The index case Had returned from traveling to Cameroon, suggesting to experts that it may have originated in the African country. | |
| And note how these new variants are suddenly being connected into Africa, just as they want to mass-fake vaccinate Africa. | |
| So what makes a variant more well known and dangerous is its ability to multiply because of the number of mutations it has in relation to the original virus. | |
| An original virus never shown to exist in any scientific paper, this article has pointed out. | |
| This is when it becomes a variant of concern like Omicron. | |
| In the new paper, dated December 29, scientists said, Well, first of all, There is no vaccine immunity or induced immunity, as they've admitted. | |
| And secondly, of course, they want you to think that these variants need another vaccine fake just for them. | |
| So they get more of them into you. | |
| The coronavirus pandemic started in China. | |
| Oxygen, medical supplies and physical strength have been hampered. | |
| Why was my vaccine a vision? | |
| Stage one you create a problem. | |
| It could be a manufactured virus. | |
| You want a reaction and you want them to either say do something or you want them to accept what the authorities suggest must be done. | |
| So one of the agendas is to massively cull the population. | |
| They want to reduce the numbers. |
Export Selection