Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 26, 2021 - David Icke

21:14

What Is Graphene Oxide? - David Icke

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
	♪♪♪ And there's two articles on davidive.com by John Rappaport,
	who's been on the case of the fake virus, because it is a fake virus.
	And...
	Thank you for watching.
	And other aspects to this from the start.
	And he's written two articles about graphene.
	And the first one is headed, Graphene face masks dangerous and we're living in a graphene world.
	Now it starts off, what is graphene?
	Which is a good start to see why it's being used, not only in masks, Graphene is the thinnest compound known to man at one atom thick, the lightest material known, the strongest compound ever discovered, the best conductor of heat at room temperature, the best conductor of electricity known, potentially an eco-friendly sustainable solution for an almost limitless number of applications.
	And I did mention graphene in at least one of the books in relation to the fact that it was coming in to be used in this agenda.
	And now it's reappeared in the COVID era in terms of the masks and the fake vaccines.
	So the article goes, since the discovery of graphene, Applications within different scientific disciplines have exploded, with huge gains being made, particularly in high-frequency electronics, biochemical and magnetic sensors, ultra-wide bandwidth, photo detectors, and energy storage and generation.
	So, on May 28th, John says, he wrote and posted an article about toxic graphene containing face masks.
	And since then, the subject of graphene has blown up across the internet.
	There are now claims that COVID test swabs and even vaccines contain the substance.
	A group of Spanish researchers report they're analyzing a vial of COVID vaccine and found
	it virtually nothing but graphene oxide, 98 to 99 percent graphene.
	Now this is a point that he makes next that I made when that story came out.
	He said, I'm reserving my opinion about that.
	If true, it would mean the vaccine criminals were asking for their crime to be discovered.
	They weren't trying to hide the graphene in the vaccine.
	They were parading it for everyone to see.
	I hope another independent research group analyzes another vial of a so-called COVID vaccine and reports their findings.
	And that's the point.
	You know, when that Spanish report came out, I have no problem with graphene in the vaccine, but 98 to 99 percent of it is graphene.
	Well, obviously, These big pharma demonic criminal enterprises called big pharma companies, they absolutely know that someone is going to get hold of a vial.
	I mean, they are everywhere now.
	And that they're going to do detailed research on the contents.
	They know that. So if they're saying it has something in it and it turns out it's 98% to 99% graphene, I mean, as John said, it's obviously asking to be exposed because they would have known that was coming.
	So, like I said, we need more research on that.
	But I would say this too.
	I don't think necessarily all the vials of these fake vaccines actually contain the same stuff.
	I mean, the ones that you see the elite getting where you do, they're not going to be what the public's getting.
	There's going to be a saline solution or something.
	And they may be putting some saline solution into the arms of the public for various reasons, like not killing them.
	And there may be particular versions of the so-called vaccine which are absolutely designed to kill people, particularly the elderly.
	And I have been hearing of reports from Those that have been giving this fake vaccine, that there appear to be different types for different age groups.
	How true that is, we'll see with time, but it would make sense.
	And so, like most of the truth, it's not black and white, but a shade of grey.
	But anyway, this graphene This graphene subject is very, very important because of the way it's being used.
	And you look at what John was saying there about graphene, the best conductor of electricity known, and that it's the best conductor of heat at room temperature.
	The lightest material at the strongest compound ever discovered.
	And, you know, these fake vaccines are designed for those that survive to connect the bodies of people to the smart grid.
	That's what they're there for.
	In part, there are other reasons too.
	And so anything that conducts electricity, and this is the best conductor of electricity known, Any nanotechnology that conducts electricity and interacts with electromagnetism is going to be perfect for connecting you to this grid.
	You've had the phenomenon Of people putting metal bits on their arm at the point of where the needle went in.
	And they stick like their skin is magnetic.
	And what's been happening since is you've seen more and more pictures of people being able to put it on other parts of the body and it sticks as well.
	Whereas before it was the point of the injection.
	Well, this stuff is self-replicating.
	Self-replicating nanotechnology.
	And so as the days and weeks pass, it is self-replicating and entering more and more of the body.
	And it's turning the body magnetic because it's designed to connect the body to the electromagnetic smart grid.
	And through that connection, feed perception as well as feed information about location for surveillance and all the rest of it.
	And this is why they want everyone on the planet fake vaccinated.
	On the grounds of protecting you from a virus that's never been shown to exist, and even if you believe it, the impact is marginal, especially when you look at the adopted figures.
	So anyway, this is the first article by John Rapoport, and he goes on, Meanwhile, we are suddenly living in a graphene world.
	Substances everywhere.
	This reminds me of the massive introduction of GMO farming in the 1990s.
	The strategy is familiar in industry.
	Flood the market with a new miracle product.
	When doubters start reporting serious health risks and damage, claim they're crazy, while preparing to combat lawsuits that will drag on for decades.
	Actually, that's been the strategy of the, quote, COVID vaccine makers, except in their case, they're legally exempt from liability.
	On the subject of graphene, here's a link to a stunning July 8th press release from Inerva Bioelectronics.
	And he says he strongly recommends reading the whole release.
	But the first paragraph says, InBrain Neuroelectronics, a company at the intersection of MedTech, DeepTech and Digital Health, dedicated to developing the world's first graphene-based intelligent neuroelectric system, today announced a collaboration with Merck, a leading science and technology company.
	The aim of the collaboration is to co-develop the next generation of graphene bioelectronic vagus nerve therapies targeting severe chronic diseases in Merck's therapeutic areas through Inervia Bioelectronics, a subsidiary of in-brain neuroelectronics.
	And the vagus nerve is, as I've Recall, the longest nerve in the body, it goes from the belly area right up to the brain.
	So, very much affecting human emotion.
	The phrase intelligent neuroelectric system suggests the corporations are planning to superimpose their own automatic nerve inputs and responses in the body on top of the body's natural nervous system.
	To put it another way, they want to replace deficiencies and errors in the natural nervous system With their own catalogue of preferred stimuli and responses.
	If the extreme dangers of this reprogramming aren't obvious to you, think it through.
	He says, take a prime natural physical system that is already automatic and sideline it in favour of a new ironclad automatic system.
	And you have a start on an AI Pavlovian human.
	Doctor, we rang the bell and the patient drooled.
	It's marvellous.
	Graphene toxicity requires a great deal of attention from independent investigators.
	Among the many topics needing clarification, the different forms of graphene, their relative toxicities and their relative tendencies to detach from synthetic materials and enter the body, which is what they're doing all the time.
	So this graphene is very, very important in this whole smart grid connection.
	So he then adds his May 28th Graphene article about masks, which says this, millions of face masks officially declared dangerous.
	For the past year, he said, I've been demonstrating that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been proven to exist.
	Therefore, face masks are nothing more or less than a mic control ritual.
	Exactly. However, much has been written about the harm that the masks cause.
	And now we have the official declaration on April 2, 2021, Health Canada issued an advisory warning not to use face masks labeled to contain graphene or biomass graphene.
	Andrew Maynard covers this issue in a Medium.com article.
	Manufacturers have been using nanotechnology-derived graphene in face masks.
	Now there are safety concerns.
	Those concerns, masks could create lung problems.
	Of course, since I could write a book, he says, detailing how many times this coincidence pops up in the field of medicine.
	Maynard's article traces the safety concerns to a Chinese mask manufacturer, Shandong.
	But points out that millions of graphene containing masks are in use around the world, produced by a whole host of companies.
	Yesterday, I saw a mask sold to a customer.
	It was sealed in a plain plastic bag.
	No manufacturer's name, no list of materials in the mask, nothing but a barcode.
	Does the mask contain graphene?
	No way to know. And so...
	Graphene is probably toxic to the lungs, perhaps not seriously so, perhaps only temporarily there are more questions than answers.
	That's what's come from the mainstream.
	But why have these masks, John asked, been certified anywhere in the world for public use?
	Why haven't the CDC and the World Health Organization made definitive statements about safety concerns?
	Why didn't public health agencies long ago run demand definitive tests to see whether and to what extent the nanoparticles of graphene detach themselves from various types of masks and enter the body?
	Because they don't want it to come out, of course.
	And graphene is very, very Dangerous in another way.
	It's got very sharp edges.
	Then as it passes through the body, it's cutting the body to pieces on a nano micro level.
	And that can lead to what?
	That can lead to blood clots, which is a feature of the dangers of Of these fake vaccines.
	So here's the second graphene article by John Rapoport.
	Graphene meets RNA technology for cancer vaccines.
	And he says, as soon as Operation Warp Speed was announced, this was the Trump administration plan to get the fake vaccination into everybody.
	See, Trump again, you know.
	John said, I made it clear that one of the prime goals was winning approval for experimental RNA technology.
	RNA tech has never gotten a green light prior to the COVID vaccine.
	Why? Because it was highly dangerous.
	Generally speaking, massive inflammatory response was the issue.
	The body attacks itself.
	Well, of course it does, because you're introducing A foreign synthetic genetic substance to a body that is biological and thus it wants to reject it.
	And what does it do?
	If you can confuse the genetic material that it's targeting with the body's genetic material, then it's going to attack itself as well as the synthetic stuff.
	But RNA tech, he says, allows new vaccines to be developed faster, easier and cheaper.
	Therefore, researchers could claim to discover new viruses at the drop of a hat without authentic proof.
	And pharma companies could develop new vaccines like genetic RNA treatments overnight.
	It became Bill Gates's and Tony Fauci's mission.
	To drag an RNA COVID vaccine across the finish line to emergency use approval come hell or high water, they were determined to crack open the marketplace for a flood of RNA medical products.
	In yesterday's article, this is the one I just Talked about.
	I highlighted the arrival of a miracle substance, graphene, trumpeted as the core of a new frontier in medicine.
	For example, Merck is using it to research the creation of imposed nerve responses in the body in order to knock out a whole host of disease conditions.
	Of course, the acknowledged toxicity of graphene nanoparticles is underplayed, in particular their tendency to cause lung infections.
	And now graphene and RNA tech meet in a new research into cancer vaccines.
	As they say, what could possibly go wrong?
	The reference is in-situ transforming RNA nano vaccines from polyethylamine function graphene oxide hydrogel for durable cancer issues.
	And here's an excerpt from the optimistic abstract.
	Messenger RNA, mRNA vaccine is a promising candidate in cancer immunotherapy.
	Here we report an injectable hydrogel formed with graphene oxide and polyethylamine PEI. The released nano-vaccines can protect the mRNA from degradation and confer targeted delivery capacity to lymph nodes.
	The scramble is now underway, John says, to deploy both RNA genetic tech and graphene in all sorts of medical innovations.
	You don't get just one danger, you get two.
	And here's a third wrinkle, he says.
	According to conventional vaccine theory, the injected RNA would cause cells of the body to produce a protein unique to cancer tumors.
	The immune system would attack this protein and up the road be prepared to destroy cancer before it could gain a foothold.
	It's possible that researchers from the old failed U.S. viral cancer project of the 1960s and 70s could now rewrite history, get in line and say we never failed.
	Robert Gallo did discover two cancer viruses which also have unique proteins.
	Let's develop an RNA graphene injection that empowers the immune system to attack these viruses.
	I mention this because those failed cancer researchers went on to claim a new virus called HIV caused a condition known as AIDS. And like COVID, the causative virus was never isolated, never proved to exist.
	HIV and SARS-CoV-2 are both phantom fantasies.
	And in both cases, the drug vaccine treatments are massively destructive.
	The medical cartel at work.
	And this is a very important subject because this graphene has so many properties that
	serve the cult agenda that I've been writing about for such a long time.
	It could be a manufactured virus.
	You want a reaction and you want them to either say, do something, or you want them to accept what the authorities suggest must be done.
	So one of the agendas is to massively cull the population.
	They want to reduce the numbers.

▲