All Episodes
Previous Next
March 1, 2021 - David Icke
53:43
Ask The Experts 2 - BBC Panorama Response - Oracle Films
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
On the 15th of February 2021, the BBC aired a Panorama documentary entitled Vaccines They
The Disinformation War. The programme spent a great majority of its 29-minute runtime attacking a film we produced in collaboration with Covileaks in December called Ask the Experts.
It brought together the professional opinions of medical doctors, scientists and professors from around the world, specifically regarding the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.
All experts involved were speaking on behalf of themselves and not as a collective.
Every person that spoke out did so with no financial incentive and at great personal risk to their reputation and their livelihood.
The BBC accused Oracle Films of spreading dangerous misinformation and targeting it at vulnerable people and ethnic minorities.
Liam Smeeth, Professor of Clinical Epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, prominently featured in the programme.
Smeeth claimed the information in Ask the Experts was putting the health of vulnerable people at risk and that doctors spreading, quote, false claims should be investigated and perhaps even have their licences revoked.
Now, setting aside for a moment the question of exactly who is deciding in this scenario what is true and what is false, I should point out that it is not our intent to discredit the scientific prowess of Professor Smeeth.
The man is clearly a qualified and accomplished career academic in the fields of epidemiology and medicine.
We would, however, be remiss were we not to point out the multiple, flagrant conflicts of interest attached to him.
A quick browse of the awards and grants section of the Bill& Melinda Gates Foundation will show you that the LSHTM has received no fewer than 122 grants from the Bill& Melinda Gates Foundation spanning the past 20 years, totalling well over $250 million in donations.
BBC Media Action, the BBC's international development charity, has also received over $50 million from the Gates Foundation in the same time frame.
Smeath is a member of the steering group for UK Biobank, the UK's major biomedical database, which has catalogued in-depth genetic and health information from over half a million UK participants to date.
Last year, UK Biobank partnered with DNA Nexus, a cloud-based analytics platform aimed at genomics and other clinical big data.
DNA Nexus is funded in large part by donations from Google and Microsoft, with Gates himself listed here as an owner.
Why didn't Panorama, which the BBC describes as an investigative documentary series revealing the truth about the stories that matter, consider these huge vested interests when choosing Smith alone to, quote, debunk the professional opinions of dozens of specialists from around the world?
Science is the pursuit of truth, and it should never be considered settled as long as scientists and doctors are putting forward alternative opinion.
We stand by our decision to offer medical doctors a platform to express their views during a time of immense government overstep, coercion and digital censorship.
Every person on the planet has the right to make an informed choice and the right to receive information.
We aim to preserve that right and we will never stop fighting for it.
Thank you. My name is Dr.
Andrew Kaufman. I'm a board-certified forensic psychiatrist and general psychiatrist here in New York in the United States of America.
Today, I'm talking to you about the new so-called vaccines that have been authorized for use on an emergency basis for COVID-19.
Now, I want to tell you first that these vaccines are experimental treatments.
They are not approved by any government agency, If you look at the authorization letter from the FDA for either Pfizer or Moderna products, you'll see the following language.
Quote, Based on the totality of scientific evidence available to FDA, it is reasonable to believe that Moderna or Pfizer vaccine may be effective in preventing COVID-19.
As you can see, these are not declarative statements.
They do not have certainty.
It says it is reasonable to believe and that it may be effective.
In fact, the reason That they are unable to put advertisements on television in the United States is because it is not an approved treatment for COVID-19.
And this is also the reason that in the military, they are unable to force this vaccine on soldiers, and many of them have refused, which is unprecedented for military personnel.
The central question is how does any scientist, any virologist, prove that a, quote, new virus is the cause of any illness?
The answer is surprisingly clear and straightforward.
It also mimics how any normal human being proves the causation of anything.
The first thing one does is to find a number of people who seem to suffer from the illness in question.
This could be COVID-19, AIDS, Hep C, or any other illness.
Then, using standard and common virological isolation and purification techniques, techniques that have been in common use in every virology lab for decades.
One would isolate the virus from every other substance in the blood, sputum, or tissues of the affected person or animal.
Using electron microscopy, one then shows the world the pure isolated particles called viruses from each of these people.
All of the viruses should look identical.
The next step would be to analyze the genetic material of these identical particles using commonly available computerized genetic sequencing tools, which have also been available for decades.
These sequences should also be identical, from one particle to the next.
Finally, these isolated, purified, photographed, and sequenced viruses would then be introduced onto test animals along with rigorous and appropriate controls to see whether the test animals developed the identical illness that the original subjects had.
Then and only then, once these steps have been performed, can we say with confidence that this new virus is the likely cause of this new illness.
During this past year, I have spent countless hours looking for evidence that these simple steps were done for the illness called COVID-19 and that the virus called SARS-CoV-2 was properly isolated and characterized.
To my shock and surprise, neither I nor anyone else I know looking into this issue has yet to find a single published study that even attempted to perform these simple and doable experiments.
To my further shock and surprise, I found that not only were these experiments not done with SARS-CoV-2, but they were also not done with AIDS, Hep C, measles, or any other illness supposedly caused by pathogenic viruses.
As shocking as this may be to hear, I now ask that if you dispute this, please make available the paper or papers that successfully did these simple experiments.
The usual excuses for this utter failure to perform the proper scientific experiments are such statements as, Well, there's not enough virus material to see in the sputum of sick people.
Or, Viruses are intracellular organisms and therefore can't be found in this manner outside the cell.
My response is, if there aren't enough viruses can't be found from the tissues or secretions of sick people using an electron microscope, then how can these same unfindable viruses have the potential to kill us all?
And if the viruses can't be found outside the cell, so therefore don't exist outside the cell, then how on earth does it spread from person to person?
Finally, it is incorrect to say that this procedure I outlined above is just one way to isolate and characterize viruses.
The reality is, it's the only way.
Clearly, logic and common sense dictate that if you have not isolated the thing you are looking for, there is no possible way to determine what the thing is made of or what it alone does.
The implications of what I am saying are enormous.
If there is no proof of pathogenic viruses, then what in the heck is making people sick?
What is causing what people are calling COVID symptoms?
Why do some diseases seem to spread between people, but never consistently?
And most important, why are we locking down the whole world and risking losing an entire generation of children based on the fear of an imaginary virus?
There is much that is very wrong with the novel coronavirus.
Silencing any debate is professionally unethical, negligent and untruthful.
Our societies and our sciences have been fatally misdirected through the manufacture of a false belief in a so-called virus that has never been purified and shown to cause a confected disease called COVID-19.
Our National Health Service has become a COVID health service run by the government and not by our healthcare professionals as it should be.
It now boasts a murderous chain of command and control similar to that of the German health services in the Nazi era.
This has come about because of the science advance to Boris Johnson by Imperial College London, led by Professor Neil Ferguson, and the rest of the government-appointed scientists.
This was despite Ferguson and Imperial College's poor track record.
Many will remember Imperial College London and Ferguson are guilty of fuelling the mad cow case-demic and trying to kick-start other pseudo-epidemics.
Today it is not the cattle that are being killed.
like in the mad cow fiasco, but us and our loved ones in hospitals and care homes through murderous medical protocols like the nice frailty scores, do not resuscitate orders and ventilation protocols.
The mainstream media is saying that speaking out like this is somehow dangerous or even mad.
Why? What is there to hide?
I and many other healthcare professionals argue that the real danger and the true madness is that the mainstream media like the BBC, ruled by the government and the pharmaceutical industry, will not allow any open discussion of these vital issues within the public domain.
The mainstream media are thereby failing in their public duty to question what they're being told before they pass it on into the public domain.
Therefore, the mainstream media and anyone else who remains silent on this vital issue are complicit in this crime of genocide.
My name is Anne Fyrlafeen.
I'm a medical doctor in Belgium working a lot with chronic infectious diseases resulting in fatigue and pain.
I'm very concerned about the way the COVID-19 vaccine rollout is pushed worldwide and how critical observations are labeled as dangerous for public health and are banned.
The rising numbers of deaths we see in care homes after vaccination need to be examined so we can get a better understanding of what is happening exactly.
We should also be careful with vaccinating people that have already had COVID-19.
There are no safety data for this group and it is a possibility that the acquired immunity may lead to more severe side effects from the vaccine.
I really believe the public deserves honest and correct information and that calls for open communication and debate.
I am Hilde de Smet.
I'm a Belgian medical doctor and I'd like to say some more about the COVID-19 vaccines currently applied in Europe, in the US and in other countries of the world.
All the three vaccines are still in phase three of the clinical trials.
Almost nobody is aware of this.
But usually a medicine comes on the market in phase four, when the efficacy and the safety of a vaccine or a medicine is sufficiently proven.
But phase three of those vaccines will only be finished at the end of 2022.
This means that we with the whole population take part in a large, immense clinical trial before we have sufficient data.
that the vaccines are safe and efficient.
My name is Konstantin Pavlidis, and I would like to address the subject of disinformation in the global pandemic.
Currently, there seems to be a situation which combines misinformation and disinformation.
Misinformation is when false information is unintentionally shared, leading to many points of view or opinions that are incorrect or misleading.
Disinformation is a deliberate spread of false information in order to influence public opinion or hide the truth.
Neither of these are based on fact, and the combination of the two creates a condition of non-information, which I call info-noise.
This has the same effect as white noise or white light, meaning that any distinguishing variation of amplitude or intensity gets cancelled out through destructive interference, resulting in a state which is out of phase or alignment.
The result of any lockdowns coupled with this info noise through all forms of media creates a confusion and represses the ability to think, decide and act in a coherent manner.
It also activates the fight or flight mechanism, individually and in the collective unconscious of society, triggering instant gratification where we search for the easiest solution based on very limited information.
The brain typically filters statistics, Probabilities, facts and figures, so people end up making decisions using the simplest, most direct methods with the least amount of effort, commitment and responsibility.
The UK Vaccine Minister has informed the public on the 4th of February 2021 that there are an estimated 4,000 COVID strains worldwide.
The problem posed here is not the 4000 strains, but how these are distributed across the global population.
We can't identify and clearly discern the presence of all these strains using the current standard testing procedures.
This is why it takes years of preparatory and investigative scientific research to produce an effective medical solution.
Therefore, the issue of creating validated, efficacious vaccines for 4,000 COVID strains compromises the integrity of making any substantial decision toward accepting these vaccines as a global solution to the current pandemic.
This is another example of info noise from the media due to the lack of scientifically validated, statistically significant information regarding the 4,000 COVID strains.
So there's very good news today.
Vitamin D has been shown in studies from Barcelona to reduce deaths by about 70% in hospitals and I would highly recommend that everybody takes vitamin D. Around about 4,000 units a day should do it and that will protect your immune system.
We are born with wonderful immune systems and we must learn to protect and enhance them.
So I highly recommend vitamin C, vitamin D and zinc.
As for the vaccine, I'm not sure we even need one.
There's a 99.95% survival rate if you're under 70, according to the WHO itself.
And the vaccines at the moment are being rolled out through the care homes.
And at the same time as the vaccines are being rolled out, we're seeing an increase in deaths in the care homes.
This needs to be investigated, and I would suggest very strongly that the vaccine rollout is halted until we are certain that these vaccines are not killing people.
How dangerous is the SARS-CoV-2 virus actually?
Now we know that, thanks to the research of Professor John Niedes, the most cited scientist in the world, we know that the infection fatality rate ranges between 0.02 To 0.6%, which means that even if you are in the risk group, the probability to overcome the infection is more than 99%.
The information was also confirmed by the VHO statement from late summer 2020.
Secondly, can healthy persons be infections?
No. There have been conducted two big studies in China in August and in November 2020, which showed that the number of cases of viral transmissions by asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic persons is zero, which means a healthy person is not a danger.
Also, in fact, of the study coercing healthy persons to wearing masks is a nonsense.
There are no studies that would rule out the risk of developing antibody-dependent enhancement of infection.
After receiving the vaccine, which means you can get very sick or even die due to having the so-called non-neutralizing antibodies.
Why should you put your own health at risk?
If government experts like Professor Smith assume that there have been carried out normal animal trials, that I must assume he doesn't know what he's talking about.
Animal trials!
that are carried out before allowing a vaccine to be used by humans must last at least two years, the analysis of them, and carrying out an analysis of such trials.
Peter Gutscher wrote a book called Deadly Medicines and Organized Crime, winner of the British Medical Association Book Award.
As the former director of the famous Cochrane Institute Denmark, his expertise and knowledge is beyond doubt.
In this book we learn that medicines are the third main cause of death after cancer and cardiovascular diseases.
Big Pharma and the vaccine industry have the model of organized crime.
They cover up Research results, conceal side effects, invent new indications to sell their toxic medicines.
They bribe doctors and professors, sponsor universities, infiltrate continuing education and regulatory commissions, corrupt patient organizations, place false advertisements, Defraud journals and editorial boards with ghostwriters.
There is no juridical liability with this vaccine.
So you bear all the risks yourself.
The whole corona scam was put into place to make you fearful enough to take this vaccine.
The definition of vaccine was recently changed because their legal immunity is only for vaccines.
But this is not a vaccine.
It is an experimental gene therapy with you as a guinea pig.
It is a medical experiment on a worldwide scale.
Therefore, the definitions needed to be changed to escape liability and make it look like a vaccine.
Truth will set us free.
Light will conquer darkness.
We have been fed over the last 12 months a diet of corrupted data.
We have seen distortion done at a level we could never have dreamt.
We've seen our individual rights across the globe invaded and intruded upon by bureaucrats and political people who have no particular commitment to science itself.
We've seen the phrase, follow the science, absolutely bastardized.
We've seen the expansion of government by executive fiat in a willingness to absolutely push aside the legislative channels.
And finally, we've seen citizens, whether they be young or old, people in business or not, we've seen them terrorized by what will the next decision by the politicians be.
We have seen this done in the total absence of transparency.
We've seen models that had no connection to reality, but we were not allowed to know what were the assumptions on what was that model based.
And when people were, it was demonstrated that these people were way off the mark.
There was very little accountability.
So I'll say nothing more.
I just want to say thank you for speaking out.
I doubt that any of us would have chosen this path that we've been walking the last 10-12 months.
But whatever path we find ourselves on, I think it's our obligation to do the best we can.
As Edmund Burke said, the only thing necessary for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.
So thank you. Global depopulation is a real thing.
And so the depopulation agenda, if we're trying to keep people from getting pregnant, we use HCG in their vaccines, we use lots of aluminum in their vaccines, and if we can't do enough, as Bill Gates has said in one of his TED Talks...
So let's look at each one of these and see how we can get this down to zero.
Probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero.
That's back from high school algebra.
But let's take a look.
First, we've got population.
The world today has 6.8 billion people.
That's headed up to about 9 billion.
Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.
So the report of injuries and deaths, this comes from the VAERS database as of January 29th.
According to the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System website, which is VAERS, part of the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act, these are the number of reported incidences so far.
More than 500 reported deaths, 453 from the U.S., more than 11,000 reported adverse events and injuries, 690 reports of anaphylactic reactions to both Modera and the Pfizer vaccine, 139 cases of what they call facial asymmetry, which by everyone's standards is Bell's palsy, and there have been at least 13 miscarriages.
And I challenge everyone who's listening to this to answer this question.
Can you think of any other product in any other industry At any other point in time that has caused this much damage in eight weeks that is still on the market, and not only still on the market, but pushing for full steam ahead to get a little bit of this in every person's arm.
Take a step back and think about what that actually means.
And it's a much bigger agenda, as I'm sure many of you know.
All of this comes from mainstream peer-reviewed medical literature.
And this was the conclusion, which I'll read to you.
Based on the published literature, it should be obvious to any skilled medical practitioner, even back in 2019, that there is a significant risk to vaccine research subjects and vaccine recipients that they may experience severe disease once vaccinated, while they might only have experienced a mild, self-limiting infection.
With a 99% survival rate without the vaccine.
The consent should clearly distinguish that the risk of a worsened disease from these generic
statements should be separated from the risk of death and the lack of efficacy of this vaccine,
which means what's coming through that needle needs to be clearly described to you
on your consent form and this great big risk, which is a lie about the risk of death from a
virus that has a 99% survival rate. My name is Heiko Zantelmann, a medical doctor from Germany
living in Norway.
COVID-19 vaccines do not give immunity or inhibit transmission of the disease.
They only are designed to lessen your infection symptoms, like coughing or fever, if or when you get infected.
After getting these jabs, you still have to wear masks By referring to COVID-19 vaccines as vaccines rather than gene therapies, the governments are lying to you.
I know it's hard to believe that you are lied to by the institution you have trusted for a lifetime, but you have to understand.
If they would tell the truth, it would be illegal to come with claims like this jab is safe and effective.
They would be forced to give you full information about the content, possible side effects and alternatives to a vaccine, ask for your consent in writing, and be liable for damages and deaths that might occur.
If these GMO chips were safe, why was it so important for the producers to get total immunity against liability for serious side effects and death?
Since the vast majority of people who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 have no symptoms at all, dare not even be able to establish a causal link between the virus and the clinical disease called COVID-19.
Just some ingredients.
The AstraZeneca vaccine contains L-histidine, naturally occurring in the body, but when injected, the immune system can't differentiate between naturally occurring L-histidine from that present in the vaccine and what may follow is a cascade of autoimmune reactions.
Polysorbate, when injected, increases permeability of the blood-brain barrier, so passage of other ingredients through the barrier into the brain tissue is facilitated.
Both Moderna and Pfizer vaccines use lipid nanoparticles that contain polyethylene glycol.
Exists naturally throughout the body, may be digested, but injection may cause the immune system to see all oily substances including squalene as invaders.
The response is to create antibodies against them, result autoimmune disorders.
Polyethylene glycol has never The complete list of vaccine ingredients is not necessarily revealed.
A petition for freedom of information is possible but may be complicated.
How on earth can vaccine promoters, including doctors, possibly recommend vaccines without knowing what they actually contain?
People ask me all the time if what's going on is simply wrong or evil, and I've modified my decision.
I believe that we've headed into evil.
And I'm being so strong with my words because the American people and the people across the world have to know that you are being fed lies and disinformation.
Let me share with you, first of all, as you know, people listening, early treatment works.
Early treatment works.
There's a virus. It's called SARS-CoV-2.
It's fairly trivial in the history of humankind.
Human beings have been through pandemics since the beginning of time.
Viral illnesses crossing the globe will continue long after we're gone.
We've never managed a situation like this, and it's unnecessary.
Please go back to your lives, be happy, be joyful, and stop living in fear.
From America's Frontline Doctors, stop living in fear.
We'll be fine. We need people to understand that hydroxychloroquine, first and foremost, is a safe drug.
We know it's safe.
There is no doubt in my mind, if you can give it to a pregnant woman, if you can give it to an infant, if you can give it to a lactating mother, if it's never been a problem until 2020, it will never be a problem as a safe, effective treatment drug.
I've been prophylaxing my elderly patients and keeping their immune systems healthy with a simple combination of supplements, including vitamin D, quercetin, and zinc.
The oldest patient that I've had on this regimen that got COVID was 92 years old.
She lives in a memory care nursing home, and the sum total of her symptoms when she suffered from COVID was a runny nose.
She had a runny nose for less than a week, and she's back to her normal health.
So we can beat COVID. There are so many things we can do with supplements to get our immune system healthy before we have COVID. If we do happen to get it, we can treat with hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin.
Now that we see how cheap, widely available, and simple the things are that can treat this virus, It's a shame that the world leaders have convinced us, or so much of the world, that there's no treatment and there's no way we can beat this virus.
That couldn't be further from the truth.
It's time for these world medical bureaucrats to move aside and let us treat our patients.
At this point, the science evidencing this pandemic fallacy is overwhelming and rationally unquestionably.
This is why there's no open debate taking place.
Yet most people worldwide are either fully bought into this illusion or are feeling isolated and powerless not to conform.
And none of us are exempt from these basic human conditions, so our work must start within.
We must fully incarnate the new paradigm if we are to bring this to the world.
This so far has not been happening in a systematic way.
We can't resolve a problem with the same frame of mind that created it in the first place.
While focusing on these basic human conditions, our work must concentrate at the municipal level, at the neighborhood, at the local group, and the common law as a technical key to overcome this power struggle.
The solution to globalization is localization and the dawn of a real new paradigm for humanity.
We are all one, and this has to become evident.
The way this whole thing has started is based on fake science.
If you look in the two articles of the Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine published in January 24, the first case report from Wuhan, There were no isolation of the virus.
They talk about anemia.
They didn't take because there were no virus.
But most important, if you look at the PCR that was used to identify the sequence, they use a cycle threshold of 50 and 34, which by today's definition, this is at the time it was known, but this was fake news.
And today by the WHO definition, this should be counted as false positive.
So everything will fall apart.
This is what has to be We need to bring out this as scientists to the world that if the whole pandemic was based on wrong information, then the whole pandemic does not stand.
In February 2021, we're now dealing with new issues in relation to COVID-19 and the lockdown.
We're moving into an accountability phase.
So from a lawyer, Rainer Fulnick, in Germany, whistleblowers have informed us that, for example, in a care home, Where 31 elderly were injected, 8 of the elderly died within a week or two weeks, and an additional 11 people are seriously ill and have adverse events.
So this is 19 elderly out of 31.
So I think we need to move into an accountability phase and we need to actually hold people who are injecting and the regulatory authorities in countries for administering an mRNA intervention that is causing more harm than good.
We also need to hold the regulatory councils to account the individual members and chairs of those councils because what they are doing is striking off doctors that are trying to provide health information and to provide treatment and to also speak up about interventions like mRNA interventions that are causing harm.
So I think we should try to encourage people to walk away from these interventions that are causing unnecessary harm and death.
I first trained as a nurse in 1984.
A lot of what I was taught then, I was later to discover, was actually inaccurate.
I was certainly told that vaccines were good for us.
They took a little bit of the virus, injected it in, and it would stimulate an immune response.
How foolish I was.
I was later to go on and vaccinate my four children.
What I was told that vaccines eradicated measles was a complete lie.
Between 1900 and 1961, The symptoms that we refer to as measles had declined by 98% in some countries over 99%.
The vaccine didn't actually come in till 1963.
That new vaccine that we're told we all need actually doesn't fulfill the legal requirement and definition to be a vaccine.
It doesn't stimulate an immune response and it doesn't stop transmission.
In fact, our government are telling us this.
You still need to wear a mask.
You still need to social distance.
They don't even know if it will work.
It does, however, fulfil the definition of a device.
Now that device is going to go into your body, into your cells, into your ribosomes, where it's going to make new viral components that shouldn't be there.
Our government and the media are the lying liars of lies.
I dared to think. I dared to read the studies.
I dared to question the narrative.
I dare to question why, if you test positive for COVID-19 and you die within 28 days, regardless of your cause of death, you will go into the statistics.
That the PCR test was never a diagnostic tool and yet it's being used.
That entire industries are now collapsing.
People are losing their jobs and using food banks.
Suicide has exponentially risen after this unlawful lockdown.
We are being terrorised by our media.
Panorama stating that they are the disinformation service breaking through the disinformation.
You are complicit in a crime.
You are terrorising the public.
33 experts and you put two on your programme.
People dare to think it could save your life.
Thank you. From Montevideo, Uruguay, I'm Dr.
Mario Cabrera-Adivar, Médico General Especialista en Salud Pública, Ex-Asesor de OPSO. The current situation of world emergency sanitary, based on the fear of death, was caused by an elite with the goal of concentrating power through disinformation about a public health problem that did not exist.
One invisible enemy like a new virus that has never been alive.
One specific diagnosis that does not measure infectivity like the PCR with 100% false positive above the 35% of the umbral of 35% as the OMS alerted the 7th of December last year.
For the political decision of cataloging the asymptomatic sanos as sick.
For a confinement of sanos and their contact with social distancing and mascarillas, violating all the constitutional rights.
And a safe vaccine that, in reality, is a experimental gene treatment that does not guarantee safety or enough immunity without eliminating the restrictive measures.
Despite all this, I trust in the common sense of the common force of the population, every once more illuminated with our support, based on the truth that will be free for the good of humanity.
In January, I was curious to see how it was going in Israel because Israel was the first country to vaccinate its entire population and the vaccinations started at the 18th of December 2020.
That's about here on the graph.
And you can see here that, to our surprise, both the mortality and daily new cases had a sharp increase in Israel after starting the vaccination program.
This is from the Johns Hopkins University WHO website.
And Palestine, that is basically the same country, but they didn't get vaccinations, the Palestinians, they had a sharp decrease in new cases and mortality during the same time period.
This was very strange because you would actually expect something opposite to happen.
During the three-week period between doses, about 200 among 100,000 more than 65 years old vaccinated died.
This is to be compared to the 4.91 dead among 100,000 dying from COVID-19 without vaccination, which is a 40-time increase in death rate among the vaccinated.
Then this first reported 0.2 death rate was transferred to a 0.005 death rate by the Minister of Health without any explanation, which sounds very corrupted to me.
And among the young people under 65 years, the increase in death rate was 260 times than if you compare the vaccinated to the unvaccinated.
And this was all done in order to produce a green passport valid at most six months and promote Pfizer sales.
These estimated numbers of death from the vaccine are probably much lower than the actual numbers,
as it accounts only for those defined as COVID-19 deaths for that short time period,
and does not include later cardiac events, autoimmune reactions, and ADE, antibody-dependent
enhancement. And the authors say vaccinations have caused more deaths than the coronavirus
would have caused during the same period, and they also declare that for them this is a new
holocaust in face of Israeli authority pressure to vaccinate citizens. This is very strange.
This would be big news because this is very vital information from the country who is like the first one to vaccinate in big scale.
And it is, in my opinion, a mismanagement of information that the media doesn't report this on all the first pages of the world.
Because this is essential information for your life.
And I hope you will all receive this information and check it out thoroughly before you take any vaccines.
We have reports from VAAS in the USA that already more than 6,500 people died from the vaccine since they've been vaccinated at the end of December.
Probably you have to say times 100 because we see that there is very low reportage, reporting of side effects and adverse side effects.
And especially with the elderly and the frail people, they can say, yeah, but they had an underlying condition.
But what I would like to share with you is I think that when people get 80 or 90 years old, They're very strong people and they shouldn't just die after vaccination or experimentation, I would say.
I've always hoped I was wrong in being so concerned already since the beginning of COVID. But it seems that we have been right.
I know that there is an information war going on and I am so sorry for that.
So it's very difficult for the people that see these films to choose a camp.
You can say, I am not here to influence you, I am here to inform you.
We have lots of Information also from Israel where the vaccination campaign has been very very efficient and the government has admitted that they want to actually genetically modify the people and this genetic modifying is very important to understand.
You have to understand that you are you Also, your soul and personality because of your unique genetic code.
And if you change the genetic code of the human being, your soul might dissociate from your body, which then your life doesn't have any purpose anymore, which is It's sort of a lost soul, which you get.
And this is probably one of the aims of what they are doing, because the people that will lose the contact with their deeper and higher soul will be very easily to manipulate.
And we can see clearly from all the laws and the governments, the things they are doing, that is clearly the case.
That's what they want to effectuate.
We have been sleeping, deeply probably.
And now it's time to wake up and to wake up profoundly.
Do your own research.
Go and find out why would they want to alter your DNA. Because all of this is about your genes.
It's about your unique code.
You can see it as a sort of a playing god.
So you have seen that they have built, created this prison around us.
We can't do anything without having this vaccine.
This is the creation of the prison and there's sort of a narrowing path if you don't go along with this experiment.
And if you go along with the experiment, all the doors will open and you can go to a concert.
This really reminds us of the Holocaust in 1940-1945 and I can tell you this is worse than that.
So please wake up. Thank you very much and protect your children.
My name is Vernon Coleman.
I was a British GP for 10 years.
I resigned because I refused to break patient confidentiality by putting diagnoses on sick notes.
That incidentally was the only time I was ever disciplined.
I was fined by the National Health Service.
It's something I'm proud of.
Because, for me, confidentiality is important.
The BBC's official policy is not to allow any discussion or debate about vaccination.
Instead, they accept as gospel anything the government, the regulators and the drug companies tell them.
Those who question any aspect of the government line are banned.
This is an extraordinary state of affairs for a national broadcaster which is supposed to inform and educate its viewers and listeners and to provide a fair and accurate account of the news.
And it means that those who obtain all or most of their information from the BBC are never fully informed about a topic which is almost certainly the most important health issue of our times.
To use a sporting metaphor, it's as though the BBC were to report on a football match between Manchester United and Liverpool but to tell its viewers and listeners only what the Liverpool players were doing and to count only the goals scored by Liverpool.
The result, of course, is propaganda and the BBC's policy exposes it to ridicule and contempt.
From independent scientists and from journalists.
It's impossible to defend such a one-sided approach to informing the public, especially at a time when the public is desperate for accurate information.
Despite all the government's propaganda and advertising, around a third of the population
still have serious doubts about the planned vaccination programme and there are millions
who are desperately seeking solid, unbiased information upon which to base their decisions.
They won't get that information from the BBC, which steadfastly denies the evidence and
follows the official Gaetzian line that the Covid-19 vaccines are effective and safe when
the science clearly shows that they are neither.
Indeed, instead of just refusing to debate with those who question the plan to give an
experimental Covid-19 jab to everyone in the world, the BBC seems to do everything it can
to demonise those who dare to tell the truth about the jab and indeed about everything
else related to Covid-19.
Bye.
When it comes to propaganda, the BBC has form, of course, but it's in this area of Covid-19 that the BBC's ignorance and failure to understand research or science really becomes blatant and embarrassing.
Their attempts to fact-check expert claims are so poor that I fear that an infant school teacher would be embarrassed if her pupils produced such shoddy work as part of a science project.
For example, when the BBC decided that the government's official line on mask-wearing needed support, they ignored around 100 solid scientific papers, interviewed a solitary advisor who said masks were essential and safe, quoted a curious WHO report that masks wouldn't lead to hypoxia, and then concluded that a whole library of scientific evidence could safely be ignored, or, in their words, debunked.
If this embarrassingly childish approach to science was simply embarrassing to the BBC, it wouldn't matter.
I don't think the BBC has much of a reputation anyway these days.
But there are, sadly, some who still believe what they hear or see on the BBC. And the lives of those people are in danger as a result of this grotesque parody of journalism.
By the time the COVID-19 fraud has been finally condemned, I believe the BBC will have been responsible for tens of thousands of deaths.
What a long way the BBC has travelled from the stout and solid aims of Lord Reith that the organisation should educate and inform.
Like many others, I've spent most of the last year campaigning against this fraud because I know that governments around the world are engaged in a massive conspiracy.
And for the record, my campaigning has cost me hugely in terms of reputation and finance.
BBC staff are well rewarded to endorse the government's Gatesian line, but I haven't made one penny out of my videos or articles about this fraud.
On the contrary, the cost in personal and financial terms has been massive.
I made a video for Brand YouTube explaining exactly how my Wikipedia page has been deliberately altered to demonise me.
That was done within days of my starting the campaign in March 2020.
Anyone who says the COVID-19 jab is extremely safe and completely effective is lying.
There is a long list on my website of just some of those who have been killed or injured by what is without question an experimental jab.
Anyone who looks at my record will see that I've spent my life campaigning passionately on behalf of patients.
I'm not going to be bullied into silence by people who don't understand the meaning of science or the responsibility of journalists.
As always, everything I've said or written is based on hundreds of scientific papers and real evidence, much of which is available on my website free.
My two recent books on the fraud are also available free on my website.
▲
Export Selection