Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 24, 2021 - David Icke

01:13:22

When We Realise The Power We Have, We Can End This - David Icke

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	So, let's get started.
	So So
	So When we figure that out, this game is over, but not until...
	What's going on everybody?
	Welcome to the Houston Ensemble Tantamount episode number 30 with the legendary David Icke.
	This is the best episode for us thus far.
	This is a version of us manifesting what we have been trying to manifest for the past few months.
	Yeah. We're so grateful to be here with David.
	This is just so paramount to everything we're trying to do regarding freedom of speech, freedom of information, talking facts, being rational.
	So David, thank you for being with us today.
	It's truly an honor.
	How are you doing?
	I'm doing good, yeah.
	We keep on, despite everything.
	And I had a bit of good news, actually, in the last couple of hours, that a British university study At Bristol University, has done a big study on people's views of this whole nonsense in Britain.
	And they've found that one in eleven people agree with my view on it.
	One in eleven? That's almost ten percent.
	What's amazing is I've been deleted from all the main channels.
	From your YouTubes and your Facebooks and your Twitters.
	But it's still getting out there.
	And that's why I do so many interviews, to overcome this.
	Because guys like you will put it out and people will see it.
	And cumulatively, it gets to a...
	A large number of people in total.
	And that's what we have to keep doing because the official narrative of almost everything doesn't make any sense.
	And the only way that they can protect it is to censor information that's dismantling it.
	Absolutely. So we have to work harder to get around it.
	But that was very encouraging.
	Yeah, I say to Chad a lot because my parents, a lot of my family is in Russia right now.
	And there's a prevailing kind of sentiment in Russia regarding the policy changes going on in the West.
	And there seems to be just...
	An automatic knowledge in the people of all the similarities between how the government here is kind of changing into some sort of a proto-communistic dare to say totalitarian kind of like system in which language is being more controlled how people think therefore is being more controlled and they're drawing so many parallels there in Russia Like, oh. Are you tired of the government trying to calcify your pineal gland and turn you into nothing more than a working zombie?
	Look no further because the Houston Ensemble has now been sponsored by the amazing Epic Water Filters.
	Tell us what they do, Armin. Epic Water Filter is the only true filtration system you need.
	All these other filtration systems skip out on so many terrible chemicals and minerals that are still in your water and that you should not be drinking.
	Fluoride, chromium, lead, all these other things that you do not want in your water.
	We've got Water bottles with filters on them.
	We've got home installation filters.
	We've even got pitchers. Right now you can get 20% off any of these items on EpicWaterFilters.com if you use our discount code HoustonEnsemble, all lowercase one word.
	That's HoustonEnsemble, lowercase one word, for 20% off your Epic Water Filter.
	This is what Lenin did in 1936.
	This is like Pravda, the Russian newspaper magazine.
	So things are kind of repeating themselves historically just in terms of censorship, it seems like.
	Well, there's a good reason for that.
	For 30 years plus now, I've been uncovering a global cult, as I call it.
	It's a global network of secret societies that's very compartmentalised, so those at the core of it know the big picture, and the further you come out from the core, even within the secret society network, the less you know.
	And it's... It's a secret society network which has an interlocking leadership and so globally what it does is centrally controlled and dictated.
	Now, because this goes back so far, and what they've been doing is bringing us to the current position by the incessant centralization of power.
	We have a name for it eventually called globalization.
	The more you centralize power, the fewer people have more control over more and more people.
	And so... It goes back, you can really chart it back thousands of years into ancient Babylon and Egypt and other places, ancient Rome.
	But if you take only the communistic period, first of all, Karl Marx was the banker's boy.
	He was a cult operative.
	And he was fronting up, because he didn't really write it all, he was fronting up the creation of this concept of Marxism.
	And so this cult was behind the Russian Revolution.
	I've written about this in the books.
	It was behind the Chinese Revolution, which is of Mao, and that really is big time significant in terms of current events.
	There is a technique, and what you're describing there is the repeating technique.
	You know, if you have a system of how you take away the freedom of the population and put them in a form of tyranny, call it what you like, communism, fascism, just tyranny, then if it works, keep doing it.
	So they are well-skilled By experience, passed on through the generations of the Secret Society Network, in how you You subjugate a relatively free society and you turn it into a totally controlled society.
	And why China is so significant to current events and why it's very significant that this alleged virus came out of there is because this cult was behind the Mao revolution.
	And for a specific reason, It wanted a closed society, which China was for a long time, still is to a large extent, but a closed society of total control behind which or within which it could incubate a structure, a blueprint for human control, not least based on technology, which it could then play out across the world when it found the excuse to do so.
	And if you look at what's happened to the West since the hoax was played, it's become more and more and more like China, which is what, of course, you were describing.
	So the big part of this, or one of the major parts of this, is that I grew up in Britain in the 50s and 60s in a left of centre household and environment.
	And the left then was about challenging the power of of authority, challenging the power of what were then millionaires, now billionaires, challenging the power of corporations and crucially standing up for free speech and demanding that everyone has the right to their opinion.
	What's happened in recent generations Through the schools and the universities and the colleges, and it's been systematic, very carefully planned.
	The left that I've just described has been hijacked by what's become known as woke, the woke mentality.
	And the woke mentality is actually an inversion of the old traditional left.
	It's not progressive.
	It's not liberal.
	It's tyrannical.
	And it is demanding all the things you just described.
	It is demanding them.
	So when I talk about inversion, I'm not kidding, because when you look at the old left was standing up for freedom of speech, and you see the old pictures of In black and white of student marches and protests in the 60s at Berkeley demanding freedom of speech.
	Now they're going on marches demanding it's taken away.
	So why that's important is because they have a constituency, not everyone, not every young person, of course not, but a great Significant number who are pushing for the very tyranny that the cult wants.
	But most of those that are pushing it are doing it in the belief that it's some kind of anti-fascist crusade.
	And what it actually is, is a fascist crusade.
	And so now we have Biden in the White House, who's just an empty shell for the cult.
	We're seeing the full-blown, what you would call, if you didn't know the bigger picture, you would call it the woke agenda.
	But that's actually the cult agenda.
	They've just manipulated the woke mentality to push for it.
	And one of the things that's happened I just mentioned a few minutes ago the old left was challenging the power of billionaires and in many ways it was a have-have-not sort of dynamic between the two.
	But now the woke mentality has been manipulated to filter the world Not through injustice, although it thinks it is.
	Of course, our social justice worry is, but that's actually not what's going on.
	Instead of filtering the world through injustice, it filters the world through identity.
	And so we have identity politics.
	And what this has done, it means that you may be a billionaire.
	You may be a billionaire corporation.
	You may be screwing the world, screwing the poor, screwing the black communities.
	You may be doing all that, and they are.
	But as long as you speak the language, same with the corporations of Silicon Valley, as long as you speak the language of woke, and you fund the woke organizations that people like Soros are doing, etc., then you're one of us.
	So now we have this strange dynamic, but it's not because of what I'm explaining.
	This alliance between the alleged progressive, radical, left, liberal, anything but, and the billionaire corporations, and there's a wonderful example of that in Black Lives Matter.
	What they've done with that, because it's all a psychological game, They have picked a phrase which in lowercase letters you cannot really argue with.
	Why would you argue with it?
	Black lives matter. Yeah, so do white lives.
	So does every colour lives matter.
	We all matter.
	All lives matter. And you know there's a scam going on.
	When all lives matter, which is totally inclusive, the word they keep using, is said to be a racist phrase now.
	Because it's not about inclusivity.
	It's not about coming together.
	It's about driving people apart.
	And so you have a...
	A so-called Black Lives Matter organization funded to a fantastic degree by billionaire corporations.
	And these billionaire corporations and billionaire families can be connected back, many of them, to the same families that were behind slavery.
	So now you have people funded by these networks that were behind slavery, Pulling statues down because they're anti-slavery.
	I mean, it's been a mind job, guys, that's amazing to see.
	And that's what it all is.
	When there's a few, and these are a few, you can't control the many unless you control the perceptions of the many.
	We just had one of the leaders of Black Lives Matter in Houston come to our podcast.
	And so I want to be obviously considerate and sensitive towards him because I genuinely, when we had him on, we genuinely wanted him to explain explicitly everything that he believes in.
	And so that we had a very clear picture.
	Of the organization.
	Where I believe there was...
	I wouldn't call it competition or controversy, but where there's a little bit of a misunderstanding is perhaps...
	His definition of what is racist, who is racist.
	And we found out very quickly that it was confusing.
	And for me personally, it's in this realm of semantics where nothing is defined, but really the definition is controlled by the organization and the ideology itself.
	And then on top of that, the words are becoming controlled by the organization in the sense that when we said, can black people be racist, immediate response was no.
	Black people cannot be racist.
	And it was very interesting for us to post that clip on our channel and all that kind of stuff.
	And then have a myriad of people of color debating amongst themselves because most of them of course said black people can be racist and then you have a number that are battling against them saying no black people can't be racist.
	The thing is we get what you're saying but we're also changing the definition and we're changing the jargon all the time and then nobody can understand.
	Yeah, it becomes an exclusive word that only the respected echelon of the new society can have control over.
	And everyone's kind of on the whim of that.
	But I have a question for you, David.
	You mentioned Soros and you mentioned the people funding these organizations.
	And so before I ask this question, I want to make it clear to my viewers.
	You can actually look up who funded BLM and who continues to fund BLM. It's not extremely easy to find, but it is public data and Soros is among the list.
	And Soros, I believe the numbers were like a hundred million or something last time I checked, but that's just what we're aware of.
	Why is that an issue?
	My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.
	Yes, yes. Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.
	That's right. I mean, that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years.
	Was it difficult?
	Not at all.
	Not at all. Maybe as a child you don't see the connection, but it created no problem at all.
	No feeling of guilt? No.
	For example, that I'm Jewish and here I am watching these people go, I could just as easily be there, I should be there.
	None of that. Well, of course, I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away.
	But there was no sense that I shouldn't be there because that was...
	Well, actually, a funny way, it's just like in markets, that if I weren't there, of course I wasn't doing it, but somebody else would be taking it away anyhow.
	Whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away.
	So I had no role in taking away that property.
	David? Well, it's an issue because of the total contradiction between putting that amount of money into a so-called progressive organization and a social justice organization.
	When you have stated that you have basically no interest in social justice in your financial interests, George Soros said that.
	Yeah, and so...
	When you have people that act one way but fund another, then you've got to start questioning the basis of that and the motivation of that.
	And when you then look at the fact that this elite agenda for tyranny, my God, America's moved that way, so has Britain in the last year.
	Then You've got a situation where the billionaires and the billionaire corporations that are pushing the agenda of control are funding the woke mentality in all its different forms that are supporting that movement towards the tyranny and control.
	And so, forgive me if I don't take Soros seriously, as a...
	A campaigner of justice and social justice.
	It makes absolutely no sense.
	And it's the same with all of them.
	I mean, they tell you one thing, but actually the motivation is another.
	And, you know, if I could just say one thing that people might remember to filter with, What authority says, and what this cult and the billionaires say, it is when they're telling you that something's happening for a reason, it is never that reason.
	I mean, we've seen this week, Mark Zuckerberg, Who has been banning and deleting people who are questioning this alleged COVID vaccine.
	And Project Veritas have released an internal footage of Zuckerberg.
	I do just want to make sure that I share some caution on this because we just don't know the long-term side effects of Of Zuckerberg talking to staff and pointing out that you'd be a bit careful and a bit, you know, just hold on about this because of its effect on human DNA and RNA. Where can we find this footage?
	Well, you can find it on the internet.
	It's circulating widely this week.
	And So he's saying that clearly on the video to staff privately, but banning people from his platform, which is a cult propaganda platform, for saying the same.
	So wherever you look, you hear these people speak and you see these people act and then explaining, this is why I'm doing this.
	But it's not for those reasons at all.
	Here you have Zuckerberg Aware, as he would be, that you're manipulating DNA and RNA. But he's censoring those that are widely wishing to circulate those questions.
	Why? Because if you look back at the history of this, and you think this global web of interconnecting secret societies, you start to see why there is clear unison So, the Rockefeller family, among others, were behind the creation of the World Health Organization in 1948, because they wanted to get control, and Rockefellers are massively connected to this global cult, they wanted to get control of global health policy under a single roof,
	basically. And they've managed that.
	This whole has been coordinated globally out of the World Health Organization.
	So the World Health Organization puts out the narrative.
	And if you remember, very early on, your Facebooks, et cetera, and your YouTubes actually openly announced that they were going to censor those that were questioning or challenging people.
	The narrative of the World Health Organization.
	Now, first of all, you'd think if you didn't know the bigger picture, well, that's bloody crazy.
	What were they doing that for?
	I thought it was an information platform, an opinion platform, and video platform.
	But when you realize that the World Health Organization is not only owned by this cult, it was created by it, And they were also behind the creation and they control now these major Silicon Valley platforms like Facebook and Twitter and YouTube.
	Then you can see that what you're actually seeing is two parts of the same network acting in unison.
	And the idea is that, kind of blatantly obvious when you do any research, is that the official narrative of the virus It's ridiculous.
	It's not supportable by the evidence.
	And the only way you're going to protect something that's ridiculous is to delete and censor its exposure.
	So that's what's going on.
	That's why they're doing it.
	And that's why you see this contradiction between a Zuckerberg that knows that the potential of this vaccine or ledge vaccine But Nevermind still censors people from having their opinion about it on his own platform.
	This is all part of this.
	We know one thing, but we're not going to let you tell anybody else what we know.
	Actually, the other day, Armin and I did a video.
	We've done a couple on this in the past couple days, but we did a video specifically on the censoring of Robert Kennedy Jr.
	on Instagram. I'm sure you heard about that, where he was taken down for posting information about vaccine injuries.
	We went to his response.
	And Robert Kennedy Jr.
	is a very respectable person and has a respectable career behind him.
	And the fact that we cannot openly and honestly talk about injuries, especially regarding the database, the VAERS vaccine accident something something database, which we've connected to the videos, Is extremely alarming.
	And you know, Armin and I have already had a video taken down in the past.
	I don't even...
	We really don't even know why it was taken down.
	We were talking about health and...
	Of course, but... We didn't even say anything ludicrous.
	And we are a small channel, so it's already very frightening to see how in-depth they're going with the censorship.
	And because we've probably got a lot of things to ask, what is your current opinion on censorship?
	Just so you know, David, I was following you way before I think you even had a YouTube channel.
	I remember those days.
	Let me just say this.
	First of all, I said in the books a long time ago, That the plan was to move to a situation eventually where no one anywhere in the world would hear or see anything that was not approved by the system.
	And what we've been watching over the last year is that extreme position getting closer and closer.
	But it also tells you another thing.
	The scale of the censorship.
	And the.
	The detail of the censorship in terms of little channels and whatever they're going, is that.
	This cult is not as powerful as it likes to.
	It would like us to believe it is because it can only maintain, like I said earlier, its
	narrative, its narrative is not allowed to be challenged.
	And so it's terrified.
	Basically, what we're looking at is like, you know, those those games in the
	amusement arcades where the heads come up and you're trying to get them with a hammer.
	This is what they're doing because they're terrified of the information.
	And, you know, as this study I talked about at the start has shown,
	there's a lot of heads not getting hit by the hammer.
	There's a lot of people that are getting it and this information is circulating through the various channels and
	And because of this great phrase of necessity is the mother of invention, People are now starting to create other ways to communicate outside of these mainstream platforms.
	So it's saying something very positive, the censorship, that they're not as powerful as they think they are because I don't want to censor them.
	I want to debate them, but I don't want to censor them because I'm confident in what I'm saying.
	But when you want to censor somebody, and this is what the woke mentality is all about, of course, is...
	And when you want to censor someone who has a different opinion to you, that's telling everybody you're not very confident about your opinion, that it will stand up to debate.
	So, yes, I said in March, first of all, that there wasn't a...
	And I didn't do it, you know, pulling it out of the ether.
	I talked to people, doctors, scientists, and what have you, who'd come to that conclusion.
	In fact, in March, I had an email sent to me by a friend of mine from an associate of his, who was and is a medical scientist in America.
	And he called the whole thing.
	He said in this email then, the PCR test, which they used to create the cases, is not testing for infectious virus.
	So the cases are irrelevant.
	This is back in March.
	And he said, what's going to happen here is they've not got enough deaths to justify deadly virus circulating.
	So what they'll do, basically, is create computer models that will project the fantastic number of deaths that will happen if we don't lock down.
	Because the lockdown is very simple.
	It's nothing to do with health.
	It's to do with destroying independent livelihoods so everyone becomes dependent on the state and thus under the control of the state.
	While you've got an independent income and independent employment and an independent business, you are limited in terms of the control that people have over your lives.
	When all that's gone and your only income is a guaranteed income from the state will be a pittance, well, that guaranteed income will come with consequences.
	You'll only get it if you do what you're told.
	So this is what the lockdowns are all about, always have been, to destroy, and I said this back in the spring, it's to destroy independent income.
	So the scientist was pointing out that these projections will be used to justify things that the numbers themselves don't justify.
	And he was pointing out that the PCR test We're good to go.
	The creator of the test, Kerry Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for it, he said publicly that the PCR test is only there to create lots of somethings out of something.
	Kerry, how do they misuse PCR to estimate all these supposed free viral RNAs that may or may not be there?
	I think misused PCR is not quite...
	I don't think you can misuse PCR. The results, the interpretation of it.
	See, if you can say...
	If they could find this virus in you at all, and with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.
	And what he meant by that is you take...
	A tiny piece of genetic material, not a virus isolated in and of itself, but a piece of genetic material you've taken from somebody.
	And it amplifies it.
	And the more it amplifies it, the more of the genetic material content Becomes sensitive to the test.
	And what that means is the more you amplify the sample, the more of that sample the test is going to pick up.
	So the more positives you're going to get, not for us, but for elements in that sample that the test picks up.
	And so if you want lots of cases for what you claim is a virus, But you don't have a virus to create the cases, then the PCR test is absolutely perfect because you up the amplification, you're going to get lots of positives, and then you're going to say they're testing positive for COVID-19.
	Now, I've just been looking at a video by the British government's chief scientific officer, a guy called Patrick Vallance, Who, having used the number of cases and the number of deaths to justify lockdown with all its catastrophe, he's now come out and said, well, you know, the PCR test is not always picking up Infections.
	What? What are you doing?
	At least it's the same guy who said some time ago, I quoted him in my last book, that people with COVID-19 on their death certificate have not necessarily died of COVID-19.
	So what's he on the death certificate for?
	Because... It's a complete scam and it's based on three things.
	This is how something that doesn't exist appears to exist through the figures.
	Number one, you use a test that's not testing for an infectious virus because, as the creator said, it can't.
	But every time someone does, you say that's a positive and that's a case.
	So the cases go up and up and up.
	Number two, a death is when you have tested positive with a test not testing for the virus and then die of anything, any other cause within 28 days.
	That's where your deaths are coming from.
	And number three, this is the problem they were going to have.
	You are testing people for a virus except that you're not.
	And so by definition, a lot of people, in fact, the great overwhelming majority of people, are going to test positive but have no symptoms because there's nothing wrong with them.
	But you have this plan to lock down society in its entirety virtually because you want to destroy their independent livelihoods.
	So how do we get around that?
	So what they did, with no evidence, is they said, those that test positive but have no symptoms can still pass on the virus to other people.
	And they said, therefore, we've got to lock everybody down Because we have to protect the vulnerable.
	And by vulnerable, they're overwhelmingly talking about old people who've been dying in their tens and tens of thousands from the effects of lockdown.
	And many now, as the figures show, after having this vaccine.
	So they couldn't care less about old people.
	They couldn't care less about anybody, really.
	But they have this simple three-pronged system.
	Testing for cases that aren't cases, saying the cases are deaths if people die of any other cause within 28 days, and you can pass on what you don't have to other people.
	And those three things together are actually the whole basis of what's happening.
	And the deaths are redesignation.
	I mean, what are the chances...
	Of a disease claimed to have flu-like symptoms to have gone up and up and up according to the figures.
	At the same time that the classic disease with flu-like symptoms, flu, disappears worldwide.
	And we're going to show that graph.
	Yeah, we're going to show that graph right now in this image later because it's amazing to look at that there are no cases on the graph.
	It's comical. It's comical.
	It is comical, yeah.
	And because of the 28 days scam, we've had people being hit by buses, falling down the stairs, deaths from all different things, including there was one coroner in a county in America who pointed out that the quarantine was going on the death certificate for people who had gunshot wounds in the chest.
	It's crazy.
	And I'll tell you another thing, is that the moment I said back in the spring, there is no...
	That's when all the censorship started.
	Immediately. The interview in which I first said it, that was gone.
	Facebook lost it.
	It all started then.
	Because this is my view from my research.
	People have to, of course, make their own minds of what they think.
	But What happens is you have the main story.
	And the main story at the start was that this was a natural outbreak from some bats in Wuhan.
	And this is how it came about.
	Well, I dismissed that from the start.
	And I'll tell you why. Because I've been researching this for 30 years I could see when this started to kick off, even in its early times, the potential that this had to advance this agenda massively quickly.
	And so, in my experience over the years, there are times, of course there are times, when something will happen naturally, it will occur naturally, and the cult will see an opportunity to use it and exploit it, to push the agenda on. Yes, that happens, of course.
	But the major society-changing events That advance their agenda in great leaps.
	That's never a natural event.
	It's a made-to-happen event.
	So the second point was, well, okay, if there is a virus, where did it come from?
	They naturally know.
	But where did it come from?
	And then the story started circulating about a leak from the Wuhan bio lab, which a lot of the alternative media picked up and went with.
	And I would say, you know, you've got to be careful about what I call designer manipulation.
	These people are very canny.
	They're very, you know...
	Psychopathic, but they're clever in an intellectual way.
	And they know, and always know, especially now, that when they put out their main narrative, that there are now increasing numbers of people in what's called the alternative media who are not going to buy it.
	And they're going to look for an alternative.
	So what they do is they give them an alternative.
	It's like giving a dog a bone.
	Go and chew on that. You're no problem anymore.
	And so it was a bioweapon.
	And, you know, I sort of sat on the fence with that for a bit, and I thought, what I usually do is, okay, I'm going to watch this.
	I'm not going to, you know, make big conclusions.
	I'm going to watch this. And as I watched it, well, the deaths that would come from a deadly bioweapon just simply weren't manifesting.
	And the other thing about putting a bioweapon out is you lose control of it.
	And I'll tell you something about this cult mentality.
	It's terrified of losing control.
	It cannot stand states of flux when it can't call the outcome.
	Because... Behind its bravado and its big I am, it's incredibly insecure.
	And it's insecure because its survival depends on humanity behaving in a certain way and perceiving in a certain way.
	And they're terrified all the time of that changing.
	Because once it does, it's over.
	There's nearly 8 billion of us and there's a relative handful of them at the core.
	And so when you...
	When you look at the way that this cult works, if you use the analogy of a football match or a soccer match, it wouldn't be happy with controlling one side because it could influence the outcome.
	It couldn't decide it.
	So what it wants to do, and this is why you get the party political system where, you know, you appear to have a choice between certain parties, but actually what you have is a one-party state because one step back, the parties are controlled by the same force.
	No matter who's in power, the same force is in power.
	So in a football match analogy, they would want to control both sides and the referee.
	So they knew what the outcome was going to be before the game started.
	That... Take a deep breath.
	Pew. But states of flux, they don't want.
	Things they can't call, they don't want.
	And releasing a bioweapon that would go out into the open, they'd lose control of it immediately.
	See, there may be relatively few, well, very few of them at the core in full knowledge of what's going on.
	But they depend on a big hierarchical structure of other people who, the further you go down the structure, the less they know To actually play it out.
	I don't want all of them taken out because of the consequences for their agenda.
	But if you can reach a situation where you are putting things into people directly rather than circulating everywhere, then you can much more control Where this goes.
	And indeed, whether it affects you or not.
	And I've been saying for a long time, the bioweapon is not the virus.
	The bioweapon, if you call it that, is the virus.
	Justified by the illusion of the virus.
	And now we are in a different stage because people are now starting to get this virus.
	And... What it's going to do to their health, the consequences for their health, their general health, we are going to see.
	But the real reason for the vaccine to change the nature of human genetics, which is something I and others have been talking about for a very long time, this was coming.
	We're going to have a lot of people that will watch this that will be very skeptical of it, obviously.
	Regarding trust in government organizations, regarding the World Health Organization, the CDC, why is Anthony Fauci a person we should not be trusting?
	Well, you shouldn't trust any of them, because this is the structure.
	And, you know, if it was complex, it couldn't work.
	It's dead simple.
	What you have is the World Health Organization.
	That's the central point.
	And Ted Ross, the Director General of the World Health Organization, is a 100% own subsidiary of Bill Gates.
	He was on Gates organizations, Gates funded organizations before they made him Director General.
	He is a deeply mendacious and deeply unpleasant man.
	And he's been reported now to the war crimes court in The Hague for alleged genocide against Ethiopian people when he was foreign visitor there.
	And there is a prominent lawyer in Germany that is...
	Putting out a class action lawsuit against him and another guy called Christian Drosten, who was involved with his PCR test manipulation for crimes against humanity.
	So you've got this Gates voice box putting out the official story out of the World Health Organization.
	And then this is where we go to Fauci.
	In the different countries are chief medical officers and scientific advisors.
	And they sit on top of a hierarchy of the medical system.
	So they are dictating from that point at the top.
	And there doesn't have to be many of them, very few.
	If you look at these medical pyramids in each country, the policy comes from very few people at the top and the rest of the pyramid, the doctors, the nurses and so on and the administrators, they just play it out.
	They do as they're told, basically, or else.
	And so in Britain, we have a guy called Chris Whitty, who is the chief medical officer.
	We have that guy, Patrick Vallance, who's the chief scientific advisor.
	And in America, you have Fauci.
	And these people have enormous connections to Bill Gates.
	I mean, Chris Whitty in Britain, the chief medical officer, was given a $40 million grant by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
	And Fauci has enormous connections to Bill Gates.
	And so the way that it plays out is real simple.
	See, The way the few control the many is a simple sequence of imposition and acquiescence.
	Imposition and acquiescence comes all the way down the hierarchical pyramids.
	So at the top, you've got this tiny group in the inner core of this cult.
	And it is imposing its agenda upon the level below it, which accepts the agenda, acquiesces to it, and imposes it on the level below.
	And very soon after you come down from that pyramid peak, you are meeting levels of the hierarchy from then on.
	That have no idea there even is a cult.
	But the imposition acquiescence continues all the way down the pyramid, where people at a higher level of decision-making dictate to the next level, who acquiesce and then dictate to the next level.
	And it comes down eventually to the population in general.
	And if we acquiesce, In the same way, to that level of the pyramid that's imposing upon us, government and law enforcement, etc., then we create a situation where we complete a circuit between the few at the top and the whole population of acquiescence, imposition and acquiescence, where the desires, the agenda of the tiny few at the top are imposed on the entire population.
	And it's all done through imposition and acquiescence.
	So if you look at this tyranny that's unfolding around the world, tyranny, fascism, communism, it doesn't come in or it's not imposed by the fascists or the communists or the tyranny in whatever form it takes.
	There's never enough of them.
	It's imposed on the people by the people acquiescing.
	To the tyranny. Because if we didn't, it would be impossible.
	You know, you have that protest by Trump supporters at the Capitol.
	Okay, you know, you want to go and protest, that's all right.
	I mean, protests are not the extreme way that happened by the few, but there's a lot more to say about that.
	But, you know, protests are a good symbol of public feeling.
	We're told that 74 million people voted for Trump.
	74 million people out of, what, 330 million.
	Well, what if those 74 million just refused to acquiesce with their own enslavement?
	What if they opened their businesses?
	What if they went and worked for the businesses that were opened?
	What if they refused to wear a mask, which has nothing to do with health and everything to do with destroying health and rewiring people psychologically?
	What if they refused to follow these ludicrous rules that have been imposed for reasons only of control?
	They would be unenforceable.
	Unenforceable. But because...
	People acquiesce on the level that they do.
	It means the few can control the many.
	And that's the only way that they can do it.
	And if people go on acquiescing...
	See, there's two types, really.
	There's those that acquiesce because they believe the narrative.
	And there's those that acquiesce because they don't believe the narrative, or at least are questioning of it.
	But they are intimidated into doing it because they fear the consequences of not doing it.
	And those two perceptual states of what is allowed, I mean it is a head-shakingly few people at the core to impose this global tyranny on the human race since the turn of 2020.
	What can we do about...
	It's very disheartening when I've spoken to friends and loved ones.
	My family is actually, like I said, they are aware of communistic tactics very well.
	So to them, this whole thing is kind of a sham, and it's been a sham from the get-go.
	But to my other friends...
	Who don't know that much about history, who are inexperienced, who've not lived outside the U.S. They just don't have a large perspective.
	It's so disheartening speaking with them because, for example, when I would mention, you know, I would say, isn't it a little baffling that this new virus is able to have so many different symptoms or no symptoms at all?
	Or it does this, it does that, whatever they want it to do.
	And they're like, no, it's just a new thing.
	We just don't understand it.
	And they acquiesce so quickly to the official rhetoric.
	And to even question something appears scientific or dumb.
	And then you'll get shamed on top of it.
	And then you'll get shamed. And ostracized.
	What can we do to help those individuals?
	You see... About anti-science and unscientific.
	What's been happening in the last year is completely anti-science.
	It's been the science of the World Health Organization, which is not science at all.
	And through that structure I talked about a few minutes ago, the chief medical officers and the science advisors are taking that unscientific narrative and then they're imposing it upon their national pyramids, medical and political pyramids.
	And so what do we hear from politicians all over the world?
	We're following the science, but they're not.
	They're following the science delivered by these characters, not the science that in any way relates to science.
	We're going to lead with science and truth.
	We believe in both. And it's the people that are doing the alternative research that are following the science, because that's where the evidence takes them.
	And that's why the Silicon Valley giants are censoring them, because they don't want the science to be known, dissected and analyzed.
	But what you just mentioned is an interesting point, because why is that?
	Why do people acquiesce so easy?
	Why do people believe authority so easily when authority has a total historical record of lying through its teeth?
	In whatever era, whatever era, whatever culture, with very, very few exceptions.
	Authority lies, because authority wants power, and to keep power and to keep control, it has to lie, particularly about why things are happening.
	But, you know, what is going on now has been prepared for for a very, very long time, including preparing the psyche of the population.
	And if you look at a human life, it is, A, a download of perception.
	You know, you come out of the womb and immediately you are impacted with your perceptions by your parents who've been through the same system you're about to go through and overwhelmingly bought it.
	And then you go to school and immediately you're in a setting whereby the state is He's telling you when you have to be there, when you can leave, when you can talk, when you can eat, when you can go to the toilet.
	And the process begins, not just of perceptually downloading your version of what you believe is life and yourself.
	It's downloading acquiescence to authority from the earliest possible age.
	So when you go to school as a kid, And you acquiesce to authority.
	You do everything the teacher says.
	You never question.
	Well, there is an outcome for that.
	There is a consequence for that.
	Basically, you're left alone.
	But you challenge or question what the teacher is saying.
	And now you're a disruptive influence in the classroom, and there are other consequences for those people.
	Now, I'm fortunate because I was a disruptive influence in the classroom, not in any other way.
	I just didn't buy what I was being told.
	And I just didn't take it on board as a belief system.
	But, you know, you look at the kids and you think, well...
	Do I really want to go into the class every day and have this hassle by questioning the teacher?
	How do you know that and all that stuff?
	Or do I just get on with it, anything for a peaceful life?
	And what that does, you start to drop in to...
	Reflex action acquiescence to authority.
	And then when you leave school or you leave the education system, you go into the world of work and your teacher is now your boss.
	It's a different name, but actually it's the same dynamic much of the time.
	I have to do what I'm told.
	You've got the government telling you what you have to do.
	You've got law enforcement telling you what you have to do.
	You've got the media telling you what you have to do.
	And if you're a public figure and you don't do it, well, you get a lot of wrath and abuse for not doing what you were supposed to do.
	And so what happens is that people become acquiescently They have this relationship with authority, where authority is seen as the boss and the teacher, and they're the pupil or the employee.
	And this goes on all the way through your life.
	And I've come across people well into their life, shall we say, who just believe anything authority tells them, because they're authority.
	I had a grandfather who was absolutely like that.
	If authority said it, it had to be true.
	And so they're the ones that just follow whatever they're told to do.
	Then you've got the other people who won't have it.
	And they're known as the rebels and the renegades and the troublemakers and the dangerous people.
	And the only danger we are is that we are a danger to the official narrative which downloads the official perception of how people should see the world and themselves.
	We're not having it.
	So this dynamic between that which acquiesces without question and that which challenges that and gets the pushback, you look through history.
	You look in any culture, any religious system, any period of history, and you'll see the same dynamic.
	Most people just do what authority says, and the few push back, and they are the ones targeted by authority.
	And so you can understand from this...
	And, you know, the body is a...
	It's an information field.
	And we call it genetics, whatever you want to call it.
	It's an information field.
	And these information fields are passed on through the generations.
	And these fields can be changed by consciousness.
	If you have a different consciousness and a different perception, a different way of seeing the world, that is going to be transferred into the information field, which is going to be passed on.
	And so acquiescence is also passed on through the generations, this reflex action acquiescence.
	And put it all together, and you can understand why you see what you see.
	But there comes a point, and I think we've seen this in 2020 to present time, where you can...
	Get people to see the world in a certain way, okay?
	But if the world that they're constantly seeing does not make any sense in relation to what you're telling them is happening, then that acquiescent, unquestioning response starts to break down.
	Mm-hmm. We know there's still large numbers of people.
	Even when that happens, they'll still believe authority.
	You talk about it.
	But what's happened in 2020 is that as we've come out of that spring period, when people, to be fair, didn't know if there was a deadly virus or not.
	But as we've come through the summer and round to the present time, the deadly...
	narrative... It's simply not being supported by personal experience.
	Do you know, I live on an island which has about 140,000 people just off the south coast of England.
	I am still yet to meet anyone who has personally had this virus.
	Yeah. With any symptoms whatsoever.
	I'm not surprised. You know?
	And I know more people who've died after having the vaccine and have died from this vaccine.
	When you kind of put the personal experience against what we're told is happening, then it's broken down a lot of people They've broken down the programming of a lot of people where they've actually seen through it.
	I'm fortunate in one way is that I've been doing this for decades and I remember what it used to be like.
	I remember, you know, I couldn't fill a phone booth with interest in the early days and for a long time afterwards.
	So if people have come to this relatively recently, I can understand why they're saying, why the hell do people wake up?
	Why aren't more people seeing it?
	But from my experience...
	It's dreamland today.
	The number of people who are seeing it, not necessarily all of it, but they're seeing there's a massive scam going on here.
	It's bigger than ever before, massively bigger than ever before.
	And I think there's a lot to work with and a lot to work on.
	And the more that people are driven into economic situations where they're losing everything, It takes you into a perceptual state which can often transform what you do.
	And that's the state of having nothing left to lose.
	While you have something left to lose, you can acquiesce and you can defend as best you can what you think you've got to lose so you don't lose.
	When it's gone, it's like, well, if you do this, we'll do this.
	Well, hold on a minute. How can that be any worse than what I've got?
	And that changes the dynamic.
	And I think there's a lot of road to run yet before this tyranny gets complete control.
	And I'm still hopeful that this can be turned around because, okay, I believe something.
	Well, I can believe something else now.
	I can believe something different now that I believe then.
	So that's how quick things can change because perception leads to behavior.
	And collective behavior is what we call human society.
	So what we're looking at in terms of what's necessary here is a change of perception.
	And a change of perception can happen just like that.
	So, you know, I'm very encouraged, actually, in the number of people that are no longer buying it.
	Before you go, because we've had about an hour, and I don't want to keep you here, but if you can stay, feel free.
	If you can't, that's also fine.
	But if you have a final statement about what are some things you're working on and you'd like to make aware to the public going forward?
	Well, I'm just writing another book.
	I'm halfway through it. It's being written very quickly because it's for people who have gone through this process in the last year of seeing that there's something not right.
	There's something seriously not right.
	But what?
	How do they pull it off?
	To what end? Why are they doing it?
	How are they doing it?
	And it's a real wham-bang dot connector to aim to get people like that right up to speed very quickly.
	It's not going to be a terribly long book.
	So that by the end of it, it's like I can see how they're doing it.
	I can see why they're doing it.
	And actually, I can see who's doing it.
	And so I'm working as much as I can every day to get that out as fast as possible.
	But, you know, in the end...
	What can I do?
	Well, it's almost not what can I do, but what can I not do?
	And it's what I cannot do is I cannot any longer.
	I'm not having it. I'm not playing a part in my own children's enslavement.
	I'm not doing it. And that's the answer.
	It's staring us in the face.
	I don't know if you've ever seen it.
	If you go on the internet, or you go on davidite.com, it's on there as well, and you put in the search engine the tiny dot, It's an animated film.
	I first saw it a long, long time ago.
	I put it on the website the other day because it's so relevant.
	And basically it shows the size dynamic between those who are running things and the population that were being run.
	And that's why it's called the tiny dot.
	Because on the animation, you've got this massive population and you've got this tiny dot representing basically authority that's imposing its will on everyone else.
	And you do two things.
	You intimidate people into silence.
	Well, you do three things. You intimidate people into silence.
	You program people into silence because they stay silent because they don't think they need to say anything because authority knows best.
	And... And you manipulate them into either not questioning what they're told or being intimidated if they do start to question into doing anything.
	And, you know, it's there.
	We're looking at it.
	What can I do?
	Well, look at it.
	Look at the mathematical dynamic Between the controllers and the controlled, what's going on?
	Do you remember that film? It absolutely captured this.
	Was it called Ants?
	Do you remember Ants?
	Ants, you had this massive colony of ants, and they were controlled by a tiny few people.
	In this case, the quote, people, they were grasshoppers.
	I'm not sure if it's called Ants, but it was a film of the same thing.
	The film that was called Ants was absolutely along the same lines of the few just following the many.
	But there was a wonderful scene in this other animated film where the grasshoppers would tell the ants in this colony that they had to spend the year gathering food And then once a year, the grasshoppers would come and take the food.
	And there was this wonderful scene, you'll find it on the internet, where the chief grasshopper is preparing to take them off to get the food.
	And they are, I don't know, inside a tree or something.
	And they have this enormous store of food.
	Uh, and so when the, the chief grasshopper comes and says, come on, we're going to, we're going to get the food.
	What they were saying, the, you know, the rank and file is, hey, boss, we don't have to go and get the food.
	Oh, we got all the food. What are we going to get, get the food from the ants for?
	We've got enough, look at it. And then he's told them the facts of life of the few controlling the many.
	He said, because in a previous scene, When they'd gone to their ant colony, one ant had stood up and challenged what they were doing.
	And this guy, this chief grasshopper said, yeah, what do we have to go and get the food for?
	Have we got plenty of food?
	Hey, party, guys!
	And then he said, but just hold on.
	There was that one ant that basically challenged me.
	Oh yes, boss, but that was just one ant.
	They're puny. Oh yeah.
	But those ants, he said, outnumber us 100 to 1.
	And if they ever figure that out, there goes our way of life.
	And what's the answer?
	We figure out where the power is.
	They are censoring like crazy because they know where the power is.
	They're dividing and ruling us because they know where the power is.
	And when we figure that out, this game is over, but not until...
	Thank you so much, David.
	I think that's a perfect conclusion to our meeting.
	Do you have anything else, Chad?
	No, I think that was beautiful.
	David, stay on the line for just one second.
	Everybody, thank you so much for watching episode 30.
	This was really a treat.
	This was amazing. Go to davidike.com, follow his work, give him a chance.
	You know, don't glaze over it with your old belief system.
	Don't do that.
	And just give him a chance because David Icke is doing something so brave that we really need right now.
	Yeah, and we'll link everything in the description.

▲