All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 30, 2020 - David Icke
37:03
David Icke: There Is No Virus - The Latest Proof
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
♪♪♪ Hello. I won't keep you very long, which is kind of rare
for me.
But I just want to highlight the latest piece of information supporting my contention since March and April
2020 that there is no virus.
And I didn't come out with that by, you know, sitting in a darkened room pulling it out of the ether.
But by looking at the research of medical professionals who care about the truth rather than singing from the song sheet for the good of their careers.
People like Dr.
Andrew Kaufman for one.
But there are others too who have spoken out in terms of where's the evidence that there's a virus.
So I've been putting this information out since the spring because from what I saw and what I felt by looking at all the evidence and all the happenings that were going on in the world, all the government decisions, that actually there wasn't a virus.
And there are many benefits for that, as I'll come to.
But this latest piece of evidence supports that contention, as indeed more and more evidence has, as the months have passed.
And it comes from someone at Johns Hopkins University in America, which is very significant because Johns Hopkins, that whole organisation and its medical organisation, is massively involved in this global scam.
And it's It's funded to an enormous amount by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
I'll come more to that in a second.
But it's very significant because of that, that when someone from Johns Hopkins posted an article on the website that questioned, as we'll see, Whether we're being told the truth in terms of the figures and the death figures, the Johns Hopkins organization deleted it.
But thanks to the Wayback Machine, which allows you to go back and see articles that were deleted, that article is still able to be seen.
So let's look at what was said.
This is a lady called Genevieve Briand.
She's Assistant Program Director of the Applied Economics Master's Degree Program at Hopkins.
And this article here points out that according to new data, the US currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases New cases per day and deaths.
Well, this research by Genevieve Briand puts a big question mark on that and quite right, because it's all a scam.
So she analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data, official data, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the CDC. And she presented it in her webinar titled COVID-19 deaths, a look at U.S. data, which you can see on davidite.com.
In fact, I'll put that whole package under this video.
And then you can read all the background as well.
So what did she find and what did she do?
Well, instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Brianne focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the US. But this will apply around the world too.
And she used this information to shed light on the effects of, quote, COVID-19.
And those effects turn out to be all just rather different to what the authorities have been telling us.
She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on US deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the numbers of total deaths In the United States, quite obviously, if we have a new virus causing a new disease called COVID-19, then the number of deaths from all causes will rise because while COVID-19 is taking people out,
All the other causes of deaths, year on year, are also killing people.
So there has to be a rise in the number of deaths, a very significant rise, a very, very large rise for what the authorities are telling us to be true.
Turns out, from Brianne's research, that's not the case at all.
I was shocked when I heard it of course.
After retrieving data on the CDC website, Brian compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before, quote, COVID-19, was detected in the US to after infection rates, alleged infection rates.
Which come from a test, not testing for the virus, to after infection rates soared.
Surprisingly, not to some of us, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19.
Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups, which is exactly what you would expect if you've got a new disease that's taking the lives of older people on top of all the other things that take the lives of older people.
However, this increase is not seen in the CDC data.
In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.
How could that be?
Well, how about that?
What we call death by COVID-19 is merely the redesignation of the cause of death, the real cause of death.
To be COVID-19.
And that's where the death figures are coming from.
And if that wasn't the case, there would have to be an enormous rise in the number of people dying.
Compared with other years.
That's not what Briand found.
The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals It's simply because every day in the US, older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals, Brianne said, quite rightly.
Now, I've been pointing this out all through these months of this fake pandemic.
The reason that COVID-19, the SARS-CoV-2 virus that actually doesn't exist, has never been shown to, Has affected, it's said, and it appears, older people, particularly very, very old people, to an enormously greater extent, almost totally, compared with younger people.
And why is that?
Well, that's why.
When you're redesignating the real cause of death, COVID-19 to frighten the global population into believing there's a fake, or not that there's a fake, it is a fake, but into believing there's a real deadly virus and disease, then you need people dying of other causes that you can redesignate COVID-19.
And younger people virtually don't die ratio to older people, particularly very old people.
So the reason very old people appear to be overwhelmingly affected by COVID-19 is because they're dying all the time From other causes and the potential for redesignation to COVID-19 is therefore endless.
Whereas with young people, it's not.
And that's why.
It's said to kill almost entirely old people and very old people.
It's a scam.
And, you know, I do understand it, but People can't grasp the scale of the scam.
There is no virus!
Never has been! So, Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19.
Indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged.
Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people in the United States, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths, which, Which as I say, it would have to for there to be a new
killer disease.
These data analysis suggest that in contrast to most people's assumptions, most people's
perceptions coming from the programming repetition of total tosh and lies from the authorities
in all their forms.
.
The number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming.
I'll tell you how not alarming it is.
There have been no deaths...
From COVID-19 as it's depicted as a viral disease.
Because they have never shown, see other videos that I've done, they have never shown that SARS-CoV-2 exists.
Never! Not since China.
Posture started, right up to present day, never shown it.
This comes as a shock to many people, yeah, because people believe what the authorities say, unfortunately.
How is it that the data lies so far from our perception?
Because the data uncovered by Briand is the truth.
And our perceptions come, well, not our perceptions, the perceptions of many, vast numbers come, From believing what lying authorities tell them.
That's the why. Anyway, to answer that question, Brianne shifted her focus to the deaths per causes ranging from 2014 to 2020.
There is a sudden increase in deaths in 2020 due to COVID-19 because of this redesignation.
This is no surprise because COVID-19 emerged in the US in early 2020 and thus COVID-19 related deaths increased drastically afterwards.
Redesignated illusions of COVID deaths increased drastically afterwards.
Analysis of deaths per cause in 2018 revealed that the pattern of seasonal increase in the total number of deaths is a result of the rising deaths by all causes, with the top three being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia.
This is... No, that was in 2018.
This is true every year.
Every year in the US, when we observe the seasonal ups and downs, we have an increase of deaths due to all causes, Briand pointed out.
So that was 2018.
Now... When Briand looked at 2020 data, during that seasonal period, when all those diseases increase, all of which we designated COVID-19 now, COVID-19 related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases.
This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths.
However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange.
As Brianne compared the numbers of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease.
Yeah. Been redesignated COVID-19.
To make a new deadly disease appear to exist when it doesn't.
Caused by a virus.
Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, if you go underneath this video on davidike.com, this article is laid out.
You see all the graphs that she put together.
So, instead of the drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease.
Even more surprising, as seen in the graph, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes.
No wonder.
The criminal Johns Hopkins organization didn't want this information circulating.
So we have a sudden decline in deaths observed for all causes While COVID-19 deaths went up and up and up.
Why? Redesignation.
I did mention it was a scam, didn't I? This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years.
See, it's a scam.
Interestingly, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19.
Oh no, there really is a virus.
Sure there is.
This suggests, according to Briand, that COVID-19's death toll is misleading.
That has got to be the understatement of 2020.
And further back.
Brianne believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorised as being due to COVID-19, which is what I've been saying in the videos and in my book, The Answer, since this started.
Back in the spring.
The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths.
Related to. That means what happens is you have a test With a test, not testing for the virus, RT-PCR test, its creator, Kerry Mullis, said you can't use this test to identify free infectious viruses.
But that's what they're doing.
Why? Because they haven't got a virus, so they have to use a test and manipulate it and misuse it to give the impression that there's loads of people with the virus.
This is why all the great, great The overwhelming majority who test positive with a test not testing for a virus, the RT-PCR test, have no symptoms.
They have no symptoms because there's absolutely nothing wrong with their health.
It's a scam. I've gone into the PCR test elsewhere in great detail.
Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but infected with COVID-19.
No, no, no, no, no.
But who've tested positive with a test not testing for COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 is the virus they claim causing COVID-19.
But are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths.
All you've got to do is test positive with a test not testing for the virus.
That gives them the cases. Then you die of any other cause and you've died of COVID-19.
Why would you have to do that if you had a real virus?
It would do its work, wouldn't it?
Why would you have to pay hospitals massively more money for diagnosing a COVID-19?
As opposed to diagnosing someone with regular pneumonia.
It's so blatant.
So obvious to anyone with a brain cell on active duty.
Which says a lot about the enormous numbers of people still who can't see it.
What, they didn't say that on the BBC? So...
This is the likely explanation it says here.
It absolutely is the explanation for why the number of deaths have not gone up when we're supposed to have a new disease because we haven't got a new disease.
They're just re-designating people dying of what they have always died for year on year and that's why the figures are pretty much the same.
All this points, Brianne concluded, to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths.
Now, how could that be if it exists?
Total death numbers, she says, are not above normal death numbers.
We have no evidence to the contrary.
In an interview with the newsletter, Abriand addressed the question of whether COVID-19 deaths can be called misleading since the infection might have exacerbated and even led to deaths by other underlying diseases.
Well, actually, that's answerable in the sense of the way that they're saying that people even are infected is testing positive with a test, not testing for the virus.
And in some cases, people making a diagnosis on the basis of things like flu-like symptoms.
Which is why flu, look at the graphs around the world, flu has disappeared in 2020.
Where did it go? Anyone seen the flu?
I'll tell you where it's gone.
It's operating under an alias called COVID-19.
Same principle of all this that I'm talking about.
God, it's so blatant!
So, if COVID-19, the COVID-19 death toll, Brianne said, was not misleading at all, We should have observed an increased number of heart attacks and increased COVID-19 death numbers.
But a decreased number of heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn't give us a choice but to point to some misclassification.
What did the Nazis say?
The bigger the lie, the more we'll believe it.
There is no virus!
There never has been!
In other words, the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the US is considered problematic.
Only when it increases the total number of deaths or the true death burden by a significant amount in addition to the expected deaths by other causes.
Since the crude number of total deaths by all causes before and after COVID-19 has stayed the same, one can hardly say in Brianne's view that COVID-19 deaths are concerning.
So here's someone Who actually cares about uncovering the truth?
Just contrast this with the newsletter which produced this article.
Went to someone else, a classic script reader, to get their comment on Brianne's findings.
During an interview with a newsletter after the event, Brianne's presentation.
Porna Dharmasina, a master's candidate in applied economics, expressed his opinion about Brianne's concluding remarks.
He said, at the end of the day, it is still a deadly virus.
This is what we're dealing with.
I mean, what level?
Of neuron activity does it take to see the bloody obvious?
But this bloke can't.
And he's just a representative of most of the medical and scientific profession worldwide.
Script readers, repeaters, not enough neuron activity to posture a question of whether actually it's true or not.
At the end of the day, it's still a deadly virus.
No, it's not. And over-exaggeration or not, to a certain degree, is irrelevant.
Which actually makes porna darmasina irrelevant.
And then we come to this.
An article posted on the Johns Hopkins University website laying out Breanne's findings, which should have gone viral around the science community.
Hey, hold on a minute. What's going on?
There can't be a deadly virus.
In fact, actually, there can't be a COVID-19 if these figures are true.
And given they come from official sources.
It's not really possible to say they're not on the basis of the official version.
Because you're telling us that we've got a deadly virus, but these are your figures.
So the John Hopkins University The article, A Closer Look at US Deaths Due to COVID-19, published in the Science and Technology section on November 22nd, has been deleted. Though making clear the need for further research.
The article was being used to support false and dangerous inaccuracies about the impact of the pandemic.
We regret that this article may have contributed to the spread of misinformation about COVID-19.
That it may have alerted people to the fact that there's a massive global scam in which you are a part, a very key part.
Who is compiling the figures for the cases and deaths worldwide, which are being quoted in the media all the time?
Johns Hopkins University.
And, you know, people, many people now will know about the Event 201, run by the Gates Foundation, a matter of just a few weeks before the Alleged virus broke out in China.
And Event 201 was a simulation of a global pandemic of a coronavirus.
And who was one of the major players in Event 201?
Johns Hopkins University.
And Johns Hopkins was also involved in many ways an even more significant simulation in May 2018 called Clade X in Washington DC, which was another simulation of the pandemic.
So I'm not shocked to me core That Johns Hopkins University wanted rid of Breanne's findings as fast as possible because the truth is there to uncover.
The truth is there.
They just don't want people to see it, hence all this hysterical censorship by the cult-owned Silicon Valley corporations like Facebook and Twitter and And Google and YouTube.
And this cult that I've been exposing for 30 years is a web.
And in that web, you've got Johns Hopkins University at its core.
You've got the Gates Organization.
You've got the Silicon Valley Corporations.
You've got governments and so on.
You've got the World Health Organization created by the cult by the Rockefeller family and now run and dictated to by Bill Gates, who is its biggest funder.
It's all a web of unbelievable levels of deceit, almost unthinkable levels of deceit.
So why would it benefit The cult, not to have a deadly virus, only the illusion of one.
Well, for many reasons. First of all, if you release a deadly virus, actually, as I've said elsewhere, and doctors with a mind of their own have talked about at length, there's no evidence that any virus causes any disease.
But that's just another point.
But let's say if you release the deadly agent, infectious agent, well, you've lost control of it.
And if it is deadly, you're going to kill a lot of people you don't want to kill because they're operatives within your whole global system and you want them still working for you.
But there's another point, and that's the vaccine.
See, they're bringing out this Gates vaccine.
You see how the web works.
Sell them a deadly virus that doesn't exist and then justify vaccinating every man, woman and child on the planet for the deadly virus that doesn't exist and put stuff into their bodies that's going to be devastating accumulatively over a period.
So if you want to produce a vaccine and it has the appearance of working, then if you put out a real infectious agent, you've got to produce a vaccine That affects the infectious agent, but you can't do that.
There's never been a vaccine for a coronavirus.
So if you haven't got a virus, you can manipulate in the same way the figures are manipulated here, as we've seen.
You can manipulate the illusion that the vaccine is working.
Just very quickly, this is how it works.
This RT-PCR test, which is not testing for the virus, it works with amplification.
So they take a tiny, tiny amount of minuscule amount of genetic material, not virus, genetic material.
And they amplify it.
And the more they amplify it, the more of that genetic material comes out.
And as that genetic material is ultimately in the body of everyone, as at least one doctor said, well, more than one doctor now, if you amplify the RT-PCR test sample enough, then everyone is going to test positive.
Because everyone's got some of that genetic material in them.
The more you bring out, the more we're going to test positive.
And even people like Fauci, this Gates-owned crook in America, said some way back that if you amplify the PCR tests more than 30, 35 times, basically it's useless.
Well, for detecting infectious agents, it's useless anyway.
It's not what it was made for. But let's take his 30-35 cycles.
Well, we shouldn't take it because he's a freaking liar.
If he ever told the truth, he'd genetically implode from the shock.
But let's just take it that that's correct.
The National Health Service and other countries, but the National Health Service in Britain, according to its own documents, is using 45 cycles of amplification of the PCR test.
Therefore, all these cases that are justifying more and more lockdowns and destructions of businesses, and there's a reason for that, as I've gone into elsewhere, are from fake positives.
I say they're all fake positives, but even on Fauci's criteria, you're going to get fantastic numbers of fake positives with a 45-cycle amplification of the PCR test, which is happening in Britain.
That's where all the cases are coming from.
And the point is, they bloody know that.
This is the scale of psychopath that we're dealing with.
Now, if you want to show, therefore, that the vaccine works when it doesn't, because it's not meant to, it's for something else, another reason, then what you do is once you start vaccinating people and then testing them, you roll back the amplification.
And the more you roll it back, The fewer aspects of that genetic material are going to be picked up by the test.
And so fewer and fewer people are going to test positive, not because the vaccines work, but you've rolled back the amplification system.
And when doctors and people, they get a test, oh yeah, you're positive for COVID-19, there's nothing there to tell them how many cycles of amplification were used to come to that conclusion.
It's just positive, negative.
So the evidence mounts and mounts and mounts, pointing towards what I've been saying since the spring, that this hoax is so massive that actually it encompasses Destroying and transforming human society.
Destroying lives, destroying livelihoods on a monumental scale.
Devastating the mental health of the population and the kids.
Putting people in masks.
Social distancing, house arrest.
For a virus that has never, does not, and will never, in the form that they're saying, exist.
That's the scale of the scan.
And that's the scale of pure evil and psychopathy that is driving current events.
▲
Export Selection