All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 28, 2020 - David Icke
20:21
Where Is The Proof The Virus Exists? - David Icke
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
Now, John Rappaport has been a superb exposer of the virus hoax
in many areas.
And he wrote an article that was on DavidEyke.com this week.
John Rapaport is a journalist in California that I've known since when.
1996. I think I first met John.
And this is the article.
The smoking gun.
Where is the proof that the virus exists?
The CDC, for it is they again, they're basically owned by the World Health Organization, which is owned by Gates, which is owned by who is owned by the cult.
The CDC says it isn't available.
What? The proof that the virus exists isn't available?
And yet, the test for the virus, a fake virus, which is being falsely identified by a fake test, a PCR test, and claimed to be killing people through fake death certificates, Is what is behind the fake pandemic.
So this is John's article.
The CDC document titled CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus 2019 NCOV Real-Time RT PCR Diagnosis Panel is dated July 13, 2020. John goes on very deep in the document on page 39.
In a section titled Performance Characteristics, we have this, quote, Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019 NCOV are currently available, Assays, diagnostic tests, are designed for detection of the 2019 nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full-length RNA. The key phrase,
John points out, is since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019 NCOV are currently available.
And he goes on, every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say measured.
The use of the term quantified in that phrase means the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus because it is unavailable.
The CDC has no virus.
He says a further tip-off is the use of the word isolates.
Meaning no isolated virus is available.
Another way to put this, he says, no one is an isolated specimen of the COVID-19 virus.
No one has isolated the COVID-19 virus.
Therefore, no one has proved that it exists.
And I've been putting this out recently.
Since an interview on April the 6th.
In fact, before that, I just did the interview on April the 6th.
And staggeringly, but I find it very difficult to be staggered anymore by the scale of the lies, they've not shown the virus to exist.
And they're testing for it with a test that's not testing for a virus.
That they claim exists.
John goes on, as if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world.
You may not have read about this in the mainstream media, of course.
The CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus that hasn't been isolated.
And the test is looking for RNA, which is presumed To come from the virus that hasn't been proved to exist.
You know, I remember when I first came out with this, lots of people in the mainstream media, oh no, this rubbish, of course it exists.
It came out of a Wuhan biolab.
It's been made by the Chinese with support from the Americans.
No, it hasn't.
It doesn't exist.
And John continues, and using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in
the world are counting COVID cases and deaths.
and governments have instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.
All in that interview on April the 6th.
Which you can see on davidike.com at the moment as a retrospective.
If people believe you have the virus but it's not available and you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn't been extracted and purified and isolated, these people believe the moon is made of green cheese.
Or they believe the brains of the population are made of Said substance.
Which unfortunately is not a million miles away from the truth in many cases.
This is like saying, John said, we have the 20 trillion dollars.
They are contained somewhere in our myriad of accounts.
We just don't know where.
If you don't know where, you don't know you have the money.
The car keys are somewhere in the house.
We just don't know where.
Really? Really? If you don't know where, you don't know the keys are in your house.
The missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal.
We just don't know where. No, if you don't know where, you don't know the missile is in the arsenal.
The COVID virus is somewhere in the material we have.
We just haven't removed it from that material.
But we know what it is and we've identified it and we know its structure.
No. No, you don't.
You just assume that. As John points out, science is not assumptions.
Nor is it lies called assumptions.
But there is a study which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus.
They say they did.
But in July, the CDC is saying no virus is available.
I guess that means trucks were not available to bring the virus from the lab to the CDC. The trucks were out of gas.
It was raining. The bridge was washed out.
The trucks were in the shop.
Joe, the driver, couldn't find his mask and he didn't want to leave home without it.
Science is not assumptions.
And as John rightly, rightly concludes his article, the pandemic is a fraud down to the root of the poisonous tree.
And to hide the fact that the virus doesn't exist, we have the manipulation of the figures, of course.
And right in your face in Britain this week, here's a statement from the Public Health England website.
Public Health England will combine flu and COVID statistics from now on.
This report summarises the information from the surveillance systems which are used to monitor the coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19 pandemic in England.
More information on the surveillance systems are available here.
But then it says this will be the last COVID-19 surveillance report as of 8 October 2020.
The information in this report will be published in a combined weekly flu and COVID-19 surveillance report on gov.uk.
So, it couldn't be more obvious.
What they've been doing all the way through is re-diagnosing flu and many other Endless other causes of death as COVID-19.
And now they're actually making it official by fusing the counting of the figures between COVID-19 and the flu.
It's, oh dear.
Oh no, no, it's not a conspiracy.
It's just more efficient.
And there's a story on the UK column this week, COVID-19, the data exposing the dissection.
It's written by a guy called Ian Davis, I understand, from information journalism.
Compiled by someone else.
And it says, the COVID-19 data and statistics that we are all now so familiar with have been reported by the mainstream media, MSM, practically without scrutiny.
Yes, exactly. And, of course, now, if you do engage in mild scrutiny, then you'll be censored by Silicon Valley, just like people like me have been for a long time.
There are some notable exceptions, a few journalists who still understand their vital role to question power.
Unfortunately, for most part, questions have been most notable by their absence.
Without a functioning mainstream media and with government scientific advisors seemingly bought and paid for by pharmaceutical corporations and Bill Gates, it has been left to independent journalists and researchers to question the COVID-19 narrative that we're all supposed to accept without hesitation.
Few have worked harder, the article says, than Mark Oakford.
Mark has sent 1,392 Freedom of Information requests to local authorities, clinical commissioning groups, NHS trusts, police forces, educational authorities, ministerial departments and more.
While a few requests remain unanswered, he has gathered data on more than 1.6 million public sector workers across the UK. That's 1.6 million ordinary working people employed in every community from Wick in the north of Scotland for people around the world to Penzance in the very south tip of England.
Mark's efforts have provided us with an opportunity to compare what we are told about COVID-19 mortality with the actual reality in our towns and cities.
The questions he asked were reasonable and you would anticipate, given that the government is taking Further lockdown measures to fend off an alleged second wave of the pandemic, that the requested data would be readily available.
Full responses to Mark's information do not require any breach of data protection.
Mark asked the following questions.
What is the total number of your workforce?
What is the total number of staff who have died from COVID-19 within your organization?
What is the total number of staff who have been admitted to hospital as a result of COVID-19?
What is the total number of staff who have been properly diagnosed with COVID-19 not requiring hospitalization?
What is the total number of staff who have had to take time off work through isolation procedures not counting When offices have been closed.
Questions one, two and five should have been simple enough for any public sector employer to answer.
Perhaps questions three and four, less so, although you would expect conscientious staff to disclose this to their employers.
So what does Mark's diligent research reveal?
The Office of National Statistics provide mortality statistics for England and Wales.
The number they record are based upon registered death certificates.
While other source data such as the NHS and the Care Quality Commission also provide mortality statistics, all registered deaths must eventually have a corresponding death certificate.
For this reason, the Office of National Statistics are perhaps the most reliable figures.
In their latest analysis report, the ONS state the following figures for England and Wales for the period between 1st of January and 31st of August.
389,835 deaths in total.
48,168 were due to COVID-19 as it was identified as the underlying cause.
Lying being the key phrase.
13,619 were due to pneumonia.
69,781 involved pneumonia.
394 were due to influenza.
506 were involved influenza.
19,470 death certificates cited both influenza and pneumonia alongside COVID-19 deaths.
So here we have the blatant The classification of COVID-19 on a death certificate when influenza and pneumonia were involved with the same symptoms as the alleged COVID-19.
And before this hoax was played, what would have gone on the death certificate is influenza and or pneumonia.
18,642, 95.8% of these death certificates recorded COVID-19 as the underlying cause of death.
95.8% and 8.04% of these death certificates that's being referred to here recorded influenza
and pneumonia as the underlying cause of death.
So according to the 2011 census, the population of England and Wales was 56.1 million, with a working age population of 36.6 million.
Since then, the population in England and Wales has grown to 59.5 million, an increase of 6%.
Therefore, the current estimated working age population is 38.8 million people.
Of the 59.5 million, 56.3, 94.6% live in England.
Giving us a current estimated working age population of 36.7 million for England.
According to the Office of National Statistics, for the year up to the end of August, the age-standardized mortality rate for COVID-19 in England among the under 65s was 16.6 per 100,000 people.
We note that COVID-19 deaths among those under 18 is statistically zero.
So get all the kids to wear masks in schools.
The ONS claimed that approximately 6,092 people of working age in England have died from COVID-19 so far this year, with Fundamentally manipulated statistics.
For this age distribution, the chances of you dying from COVID-19 is allegedly 0.0166%.
And that's only if you accept the government's claims.
To date, Mark's research of more than 1.6 million UK workers casts significant doubt over the government figures.
For 1,641,281 UK workers, just let's get this figure round our minds here.
For 1 million...
641,281 UK workers.
The total number of deaths reported was 76.
And that's with flawed figures.
I did mention that this virus doesn't exist.
I must have mentioned it somewhere. So that's what we are dealing with, lies on a scale that stagger belief.
And what we're now starting to see, thank goodness, are lawsuits starting to appear against the National Health Service in Britain.
And I hope they're happening in other parts of the world too.
For... The deaths and suffering caused by lockdown, which was imposed because of computer models that absolutely lied about the projected deaths.
And its author, their author, Professor Neil Ferguson, brackets gates funded at Imperial College London, brackets gates funded.
▲
Export Selection