All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 23, 2020 - David Icke
01:11:55
CDC Article Admits 'Virus' Is Computer-Generated & Couldn't Infect Human Cells - David Icke
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
♪♪♪ Hello ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the David Icke Dot
Connector video cast.
Today we're going to be talking about the CDC and their admissions, which I'm sure they're not particularly happy that they've gone ahead and done.
Dad, how are you mate?
Yeah, it's another week and it's more revelations about the virus.
You know, I was gathering information in March and early April from people like Dr.
Andrew Kaufman and communicating it in those London Real interviews about the fact that the virus has never been shown to exist and its full genetic code has never been isolated and that The whole story, not least the PCR test, was a scam.
And all that's happened ever since, right up to this article I'll talk about in a second, is just confirming and confirming and confirming that.
So now we're having questions about the PCR test, all these false positives.
Yeah, well how about 100% false positive when you read about how they created the illusion of the genetic code of this virus.
This is an alleged virus.
This is an article.
It's written by Dr.
Tom Cowan. Now, he's written a book called The Cartagian Myth with his fellow author, Sally Fallon Morrell.
And I just finished it, and it's very good and highly recommended.
And he's highlighting an article put out by the CDC, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States, the kind of official health body there, And it is extraordinary.
Obviously, they didn't want people to look at actually what it says.
As Cowan says here, the purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus.
And to share this information with other scientists for their own research.
But as Cowan says, a thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.
Yes, it does.
And it confirms what, you know, I've been putting out and Dr.
Kaufman has been putting out, and indeed, Tom Cowan, since the spring.
First, he says, in the section titled Whole Genome Sequencing, I mean, just, I'll wait for this.
Really? Is it April 1st?
Oh no, it's gone. We find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, They found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes.
So unpurified samples, not only the, quote, these 37 base pairs of what they allege is the virus, but all the other crap that's in the sample.
And they...
They looked at it through the PCR test, which is not testing for the virus.
And now we can see why.
This means they actually looked at 37, Cowan says, out of the approximately 30,000 base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus.
They then took...
This can't be real.
It is. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program which filled in the rest of the base pairs.
As he says, to me, this computer generation step constitutes scientific fraud.
Now, what he does then is...
Come up with a really excellent analogy of what I've just described and how fraudulent and ludicrous this whole thing is in relation to we've isolated or we've shown that a virus exists.
He talks about it being equivalent to finding a piece of a hoof A hair from a tail and a snippet of a horn.
And then they add this information into a computer and program it to recreate a unicorn.
And then they claim this computer recreation is the real unicorn.
Of course, he says, they never actually have seen the unicorn.
So they couldn't possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorns, hair, hooves and on.
The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by consensus.
Have we found the real Gino?
All in favor.
As he says, it's a sort of like a vote.
Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary unicorn.
So they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.
Deep breath.
And just contemplate the global catastrophe that has been perpetrated on the basis of this.
The real blockbuster finding, I mean after you've heard that, and he says the real blockbuster finding, in this study comes later.
A finding so shocking, he said, that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I was reading.
He then gives the quote from this paper.
You can read it all on davidike.com.
And then he says this.
What does this language in the quote actually mean?
And why is it the most shocking statement of all the virology community?
When virologists attempt to prove infection, they have three possible hosts or models on which they can test.
The first is humans.
Exposure to humans is generally not done for ethical reasons and never has been done with SARS-CoV-2 or any coronavirus.
The second possible host is animals, forgetting for a moment that they never actually use purify virus when exposing animals.
They do use solutions that they claim contain the virus, along with all the other crap.
Exposure to animals has been done once.
With SARS-CoV-2 in an experiment that used mice.
The researchers found that none of the wild normal mice got sick.
In a group of genetically modified mice, a statistically insignificant number lost some fur, which of course is one of the big symptoms of COVID-19.
They experienced, he says, nothing like the illness called COVID-19.
The third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity, the method they most rely on is inoculation of solutions.
They say Contain the virus into a variety of tissue cultures.
As I pointed out many times, he says, and people like Andrew Kaufman have done the same, such inoculation has never been shown to kill the tissue unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.
Now, I've talked about this over the last few months.
They put what they say is kind of diseased tissue with this virus in a tissue culture and then they starve it of nutrients and put poisons in there, not these antibiotics. And when the cells start to degenerate, they say it's caused by the virus.
What? And not starving the cells of nutrition and putting poisonous crap in there.
And if you care about the truth, what you then do is you have a control study where you put healthy cells in the tissue culture and you starve them of nutrition and put crap and poison in the mix and you see if they start to degenerate.
Because if they do, it's not your bloody virus you're claiming to exist.
It's your system.
It's not been done.
They don't do control studies.
It's mind-blowing.
So... He says, the shocking thing about the above quote, you can see it on davidice.com, it's kind of scientific language.
The shocking thing about the above quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2, even in high amounts, what they claim is SARS-CoV-2, were not, I repeat, not In plain English,
Cowan says, That this, quote, new coronavirus is not infectious to human beings.
It is only infectious to monkey kidney cells.
And wait for this.
And then only when they add two potent drugs, gentamicin and ampotericin, known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.
Why would you add drugs that are toxic to kidneys in a study on the effect of kidney cells?
Monkey kidney cells.
Why would you do that? You know, I hear people say, oh, you're not a doctor.
Well, thank bloody God when I look at this.
You don't need to go through the medical schools and be indoctrinated with the way of looking at health that suits the pharmaceutical cartel.
You just need a modicum of intelligence.
And Cowan here is combining the two.
My friends, read this again and again.
These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof on their terms showing that SARS-CoV-2 virus is harmless to human beings.
That is the only possible conclusion, he says.
But unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion.
They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on...
Monkey Verocells, thanks for coming.
If people really understood how the science was done, he says, I hope they would storm the gates and demand honesty and transparency and truth.
But will they?
So, As we go along this bizarre road where utter lunacy is claimed as an excuse to transform global society, all we're seeing is more and more confirmation of the scale of the scam that's gone on.
I think people are waking up to it though.
Maybe not to this stuff, because this is stuff that's just come out and it's obviously the mainstream aren't going to publish it, obviously.
But to do with the PCR test, obviously you mentioned the fact that they're using the PCR test there.
People are waking up to that, Dad.
The fact that it is insane.
And there's quite a lot of stories breaking, only on social media to be fair, again, mainstream aren't picking them up, but of people that are just deciding to send...
Unused tests in and then they're coming back positive and people, like I think I mentioned last week, I've got two first-hand accounts of people that I know that went and queued up to get their tests that they have to do because of their jobs and then were like, this is ridiculous, forget this.
So they went home and then got a text an hour later saying they were positive and they didn't even take the test.
So that's starting to grow a bit and people are starting to go well that doesn't make any sense actually and I saw an absolute beauty today dad you'll love this.
So I've got a mate called Neg right and he was saying he's saying his mate owns a haulage company down just outside London and because they have a lot of drivers that obviously come over from Eastern Europe they then get issued tests so that when these drivers come back they have to take a test before they can go to work.
Fine. So this lady, Neg's mate, is basically, she's on the same page as us in the fact that this doesn't make sense.
So she's got the 10 tests for these 10 Polish drivers that are coming over.
So she's taken all 10 of them herself.
She's swabbed all 10 of them herself in her mouth and sent them back.
And five have come back positive and five have come back negative.
You love it.
You see, the thing is, you can break this down into very simple terms.
Number one, you say you've isolated a virus and you've found a new virus, but you have not done any experiments to show that the virus you claim exists.
Number two, you test for the virus either using kind of symptoms or as was often done in the early days and the symptoms are flu-like and which have a whole potential range of other causes and you then introduce this test called the PCR test which is not testing for the virus as its creator said it couldn't and that gives you the cases And then when you've tested positive, with a test not testing for the virus, and you die of something else, COVID-19 goes on your death certificate and that gives you the deaths.
And that, in a nutshell, is how the scam has been pulled off and continues to be.
And, you know, no wonder...
They are censoring like crazy, hysterically, because their story is so ridiculous, so unsubstantiated and unsubstantiatable that it's just sitting there waiting to be unraveled.
In fact, it already has been.
And so the only way you're going to protect it is to silence those who are doing that.
Well, exactly. And I think something that people don't realise either, because I keep hearing, obviously, in the early days, you know, the numbers, case numbers are going up.
It's like, well, of course they are, because there's more testing.
And a lot of people that are kind of by the narrative would kind of go along with that.
OK, yeah, they have increased testing, they're going to have more cases, fine.
Well, now it's more hospitalisations.
So, there's more hospitalisations with COVID. You know, that's happening, that's going up.
It's not going up anywhere like they say it's going up, but it's going up.
And what people don't realise is, if you get tested positive for coronavirus, you've got 28 days to get hospitalised with anything else.
So, if I had to do a test for work, and I've had my positive test, and that's annoying, and within 28 days, I get smacked in the face by...
A heavyweight boxer. And I end up in hospital.
I'm a COVID statistic.
And I don't think people realise that.
As long as you've had a positive test, you are a COVID admission.
So when someone says, oh God, there's 200 people admitted with COVID. And you go, but were they admitted with COVID then?
And if you break it down, it's like, well, that many car accidents, that many heart attacks, that many brain tumours, that many X, Y, and Z. So it's not as black and white as people think.
And the media are... Completely complicit in sort of trying to make people think that.
And it's ridiculous to see.
I saw a thing with Manchester where they were saying Salford ICU was at 100% capacity.
ICUs work at 96% capacity anyway.
Of course they do. They're not going to work at 20% capacity and have 80% being paid for to sit empty.
That's not how a business model works.
Which is why if you have a car accident pile up or a train crash or whatever, these people get farmed off to different hospitals because there's not enough ICU beds for a big surge of people.
So I thought, that's odd.
And I saw Richie Allen had mentioned that his friend works at Salford and actually they're not at 100% capacity with coronavirus in ICU at all.
So you do a little bit more research, a little bit more.
And what turns out is the ICU coronavirus designated beds are at 100% capacity.
So that's people that have tested positive in the last 28 days and then ended up in ICU. Car accident, heart attack, whatever.
How many beds are there?
Eight. Eight.
So Sky News says, Manchester Hospital at 100% capacity with corona patients and ICU. And you go, oh my God.
And then eight people. All right, okay.
Yeah, well, that's the thing, you see.
The rule of thumb is whatever the media tell you about this is a lie.
Whatever the government tells you about it is a lie.
Whatever the dark suit medical technocrats, answerable ultimately to Bill Gates, tell you is a lie.
You just have to invert it all.
And, you know, you've only got to look at the graphs for excess deaths, where before lockdown...
The excess deaths in the last few years average of all causes and 2020 are the same.
Then you hit lockdown.
This is not just in Britain. This is in country after country after country.
And the excess deaths soar.
Then they start to come down.
And now, as we come to present day, again, the two lines are absolutely in sync.
Of the death rate of previous years in terms of excess deaths and 2020.
They are moving along together.
And this is at a time when businesses, employment is being, well, the next stage of destroyed.
A lot of it's been destroyed already in the first phase of this.
And as I said a lot of months ago, they're going to come in with another phase of this through the autumn-winter so that they can finish off most of those businesses that are still just hanging on for dear life because it's all about destroying the economy so the whole population globally becomes dependent For survival on the state, i.e. ultimately this global cult.
And what we're hearing more and more about is this guaranteed income.
And I would just add another warning here to people.
Which I've been doing all the way through these months, and indeed in the books long before that, that this plan for a guaranteed income is not to save people from economic catastrophe.
It's to provide a just about survival income, probably less than that.
And they say, oh, we're going to do it because, oh, we care.
And so we've...
We've demolished.
We've destroyed the global economy.
We've destroyed your livelihoods.
But having done that, because we care, we're going to give you this guaranteed income because basically there isn't any employment.
And not only because of the, quote, virus, but because AI is taking more and more jobs and that will continue and continue and continue.
So we have to find a way of helping you.
Oh, guaranteed income.
It's only been books for money.
Ages and ages that this was part of the plan.
And now we can see how they're going to implement it or try.
And the idea is this.
You make people dependent on the state.
You give them a guaranteed income pittance.
But you say, actually, you can only have it if you do as you're told.
You can only have it if you have the vaccine, for instance.
You can only have it if you follow what the government tells you you must do.
If you don't have views that challenge the government's ludicrous narrative.
And we've seen this Preempted in Australia with the whole idea of if you're on state benefits and you don't give your children all the vaccines on the government's recommended list, brackets, the cult big farmers recommended list.
Um, then you lose benefits.
And this is the, this is that this was a precursor to where this is going.
So, you know, if people think guaranteed income, well, you know, well, that's all right.
Well, you know, forget it in that sense, because it's not for your benefit.
It's to control, uh, you.
And I just want to come in.
I wasn't expecting to talk about this, but I will.
Um, Many people watching this video will have come across this alleged whistleblower in Canada who says that he, she is a member of the Liberal Party of Canada and they found out the agenda ongoing.
That's going to be imposed on Canada.
But what is being described here, of course I don't know if this is genuine, what I do know is that what's being described is the agenda.
And it's the agenda for every country.
And it talks here about Moving into this guaranteed income, it also talks about there'll be a mutating COVID-19, which will become known as COVID-20, COVID-21, which was always going to happen.
Oh, it's mutating!
So we have to have another vaccine for the mutation, do we?
Yeah, just like the flu vaccine.
Yeah, okay. But this is what I want to mention.
In the books over the years, I've talked about the fact that the agenda is to delete all private property ownership so that no one owns anything and becomes dependent on the state.
And people have said, well, how are they going to pull that off?
Well, how are they going to pull off Creating mass global dependency on the state while they're doing it.
And in the same way, this is what this whistleblower says, and it's very, very, very interesting to me because I've been writing about this for so long.
What this alleged whistleblower says is that...
What we were told was that in order to offset what was essentially an economic collapse on an international scale, manufactured, that's why they wanted lockdown, that the federal government is going to offer Canadians a total debt relief.
See the rest of the world.
This is how it works.
The federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts, mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc., which all funding will be provided to Canada by the IMF, the IMF, International Monetary Fund, created and controlled to this moment by the cult.
Under what will become known as the World Debt Reset Program, in exchange for acceptance of this total debt forgiveness created by the people that are offering the debt forgiveness, the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever.
The individual would have to agree to partake in the COVID-19 and COVID-21 vaccination schedule, which would provide the individual with unrestricted travel and unrestricted living, even under full lockdown, through use of a photo identification referred to as Canada's health pass, which of course It's called the health passport etc in other parts of the world.
Committee members asked who would become the owner of the forfeited property and assets in that scenario and what would happen to lenders or financial institutions.
We were simply told the World Debt Reset Programme will handle all the details.
Now, like I say, you can't say, oh yes, that's absolutely genuine, but you can say that what is described there is the agenda, which is why I keep saying, we draw the line now, it's just going to get worse.
With the drawing the line thing, like...
Howard, it's frustrating because people say, oh, well, I'll go along with that.
Like, so we go all the way back to March, three weeks, flatten the curve.
All right, I'll go along with that. All right, well, I'll wear a mask for 10 minutes in a shop.
All right. Oh, well, I'll wear a mask at work.
And it just goes on and on and on.
And we're at a point now where we were speaking before where, you know, this whole, oh, no, kids don't have to wear masks.
No, no, kids are exempt.
Are they? Because that's changing.
And you can see that.
And we spoke earlier about something that Uncle Paul sent you, didn't he?
Yeah, this is crazy, man.
Don't sound like Joe Biden.
Crazy, man. Don't ask me about my son's corruption, man.
Don't ask me about my corruption, man.
Yeah, Joe Biden. We might get to win before we finish.
Yeah, Paul, my brother, in Leicester.
He sent me this.
He saw it in the garage. And this is produced by the Euro Garage Group, the EG Group.
And it's not that they're just selling it.
It's got their logo on it.
So they're having them produced, presumably, and made in China.
How appropriate.
Now, what this is, is a fashion mask.
Non-medical for children age 5 to 12.
So it says on it, it's a non-medical mask.
And of course, kids, younger kids, in this bracket here, are not made to wear masks.
So now they're introducing fashion masks To get those kids to wear masks, and we've covered last week the German neurologist who was explaining the potentially catastrophic consequences for the brain, especially the brains of children and young people, of the oxygen deprivation brought about by wearing masks.
How these people sleep at night, I don't know.
This EG is owned by a couple of brothers, multi, multi, multi-billionaires.
And it says on it, non-medical mask.
And it says at the back, no protection against toxic gases, so on and so forth.
But it says here, look, here, go on.
Just here, you can see, take care of your health.
On the front of a mask packet that says it's non-medical.
And so, these are $1.99, apparently, Paul tells me.
And of course, you know, when you're a billionaire, every little $1.99 helps.
And there will be parents Who'll be buying these things for their kids?
Oh well, he wants to look like everyone else.
She wants to look like everyone else.
She doesn't want to be left out.
She wants to look like everyone else in a mask, yeah?
What, you mean a prat? I can't take people in masks seriously.
There's a whole mask language I don't understand.
Sorry? Sorry? What?
What do you say? No, no, no.
I don't get it.
I don't understand you. It's bizarre.
It's just, ah, crazy.
But that is a disgrace.
And a parent's job is to parent, is to raise and look after.
So even if your kid, because they've been manipulated by everything around them, says, I want to wear a mask, no.
No, you're not because I'm a parent and that's my job to protect you.
So for me, you know, if you're a parent and you're putting a mask on your young kids, then you're a psychopath.
Simple as that. I've got no time for you.
It's disgusting. You need to have a big, long, hard look in the mirror.
Not that you'd recognise yourself because you've probably got a freaking mask on.
Yeah, the thing is that the parents are obviously not doing it because they want to harm their children.
They're doing it because of ignorance.
And the fact that they have not had the self-respect To check out what they're being told and see if it stands up.
That's what self-respect does.
If you don't have that, and it's systematically pounded out of people all their lives, then you just accept what you're told.
And, oh yeah, this is good.
You've got, hey, hey, hey, they've got masks for your age now.
You know, everyone 99.
And it's, you know, ignorance is lethal.
That's why the whole process of the structure of society is designed to keep the mass of the population in ignorance.
It's not done for fun.
It's done because they have to be in ignorance so that you, who have information you're not allowing them to have, can control them en masse.
Well, that's interesting because we're going to get on to Reuters fact check in a minute because obviously we had the chat last week where we were talking about the dangers of markets and stuff like that and obviously Reuters jumped on that.
But they were jumping on us and others earlier in this conversation whole thing when we were talking about hand sanitizers and the dangers of them and the fact that the number of chemicals in these things and the fact that they can cause death it says these things on the bottle and we were you know fact check on that sort of stuff as well so it's very interesting that today dad the Irish Times have reported that schools in Ireland that have had this hand sanitizer there's a couple of different brands of hand sanitizer for the kids And these hand sanitizers have been causing headaches and, get it, respiratory problems, quail surprise, and they've been banned, and the schools that have been using it en masse, where a lot of the kids have fallen ill with it, have actually been closed.
So where's the facts check on that then?
Do you know what I mean? Yeah, well, the thing is, what you bring up there is very, very important, because...
To grasp what is happening is to grasp the scale of evil that's behind it.
If you don't grasp that, then you're going to dismiss things that are happening because no one would be that evil.
Actually, they would.
And I've been exposing them for 30 years, the scale of the evil.
I mean, when these inner core cultists in this global cult are sacrificing children and putting children through torture to manipulate their minds and control their minds, as in things like MKUltra, then you're dealing with evil.
And evil does not have...
Evil, I define it as the absence of love.
That seems... Exactly what we're seeing.
So the idea that they would put masks on people for many, many reasons, but one of them to actually deny the brain enough oxygen to function properly, and that they would insist that people use hand sanitizer When they know it's toxic shite.
You mentioned the Irish example there.
Well, the Food and Drug Administration in America has named 75 so far brands of hand sanitizer that they say are dangerous to the point where they can cause blindness and they can cause even death.
And you've done it.
We all do it. I sit there.
I sit there in a cafe with me cup of tea.
And... I watch them walk in with their masks.
I'll tell you what I did yesterday, guys.
You know, we talked recently, I think it might have been last week, I don't know.
I think it was.
About these enormous kind of blokes, big macho men, who just submit to it and do as they're told.
Well, I had an example yesterday.
I was in this cafe, which has a very small kind of inside area, but I'm sitting outside.
It's quite a nice day. And these two blokes, massive, they walk in and they stand at the door and they put their masks on.
And they walked two tables inside the place, which was about three strides for them, sat down and took the masks off.
I mean, you know, the acquiescence level It's absolutely extraordinary.
And you see people walking into this cafe all the time, and they've got the mask on, and then they do this, oh, protection from the virus!
And they're putting absolute shite into their bodies via this organ we call the skin.
And it's just crazy.
And again, you know, what I mentioned earlier, it's basically just a modicum Of common sense.
You know, when this started, I was going to places and I was seeing this hand sanitizer every bloody way.
So what do you do?
You turn it over and you look at what's in it and what it says.
And two-thirds of the back of these bottles is warning you about the dangers and how to dispose of the bottle as if it's a hazardous waste.
Oh, protecting you from the virus.
Hey, come on. Come on, little kids.
You know, you've got to get it on.
I see all this. Kids rubbing it in.
Go on, get the sanitizer.
And all you've got to do is look at the freaking bottle.
If you've got to get rid of the bottle as a hazardous waste, what are you doing putting the contents into your body?
Because people...
Don't ask questions. They don't question in any way.
They just do what they're told.
Oh, yeah, well, they say you've got to put this on.
It's good for the... Oh, my God.
And, you know, like I say, you don't have to be a freaking doctor who's been through medical school and been pounded with the big pharmaceutical version of health, for lack of it.
You just have to have a modicum of common sense.
Putting poisons into your hands.
And therefore, absorbed into your body is insane.
I saw this, what I said to you, this Reuters fact check thing this week.
And it was quite funny because I got a notification telling me that I'd shared something that was inaccurate and had been fact checked.
And I was thinking, well, what's that then?
Because I like, you know, I make sure I know what I'm sharing.
It was me and you.
And so that tickled me.
Yeah. But yeah, it was to do with the podcast last week.
So we're talking about, obviously, the German neurologist who's come out and said the dangers of masks on the brain in terms of lack of oxygen.
And Reuters have fact-checked that.
They've not said why it's inaccurate.
They don't ever do that, do they, Dad?
They just say it's inaccurate. But, you know, isn't it funny that Reuters, this big global news agency...
He's so concerned that they have to fact-check the videocast from last week.
And here's my definition of fact-checkers.
You notice the fact-checkers have come out of nowhere and suddenly everywhere.
Fact-checkers are there for one reason.
To tell you the official story of everything is true.
That's what they're there for.
They're there to try to persuade people that information challenging the official narrative is not true.
Therefore, the individual narrative is true.
That's it. That's the whole reason for their existence.
And Reuters are one of the bloody worst.
Fact check. Face masks do not cause terrible damage to the brain by depriving it of oxygen.
And they point out that I quoted the German doctor, Margareta Grease Bryson, the neurologist, pointing all these things out and how the brain is very, very significantly affected.
potentially severely damaged by the ongoing oxygen deprivation of masks.
And what they do, Reuters, in their usual kind of manipulation, because it doesn't even have a byline on it.
It's Reuters. Reuters staff wrote it.
And what they do is they quote official sources claiming masks are safe and don't damage the brain through lack of oxygen and don't cause hypocapnia because people, we're not wearing them, People breathe in too much carbon dioxide, which their body's trying to expel.
But where they quote them, it's all prevarication.
They quote people as saying might, may.
And they quote one here.
Oh, yeah. They quote studies.
Saying, oh, the masks are safe.
But they say, the authors said, however, that further high-quality research studies into the effectiveness of different types of masks were urgently needed.
Oh, yeah, so that's all right.
Then you've proved it.
You've proved the video was wrong.
You've proved the neurologist was wrong.
And the verdict?
False. I mean...
When they're doing these fact-checking things and they're writing their report, the first word they write, or the first section of it they write, is actually the end section.
And they first write verdicts.
And then they write false and then they go to the top to justify through manipulation that verdict because they wouldn't dare have any other verdict or they wouldn't be fact-checking for Reuters for very long or any other these scam artists.
So the verdict is there is no evidence that face masks cause oxygen deprivation that damages brains or limits development.
Evidence for that statement?
Nil. It is also inaccurate to say face masks have no effect on limiting the spread of COVID-19.
Well, evidence for that, given that viral particles are minute compared with the holes in the masks.
So if I sneeze or cough, you're getting it.
Research shows masks can be an effective way to prevent transmission when combined with social distancing and eyewear.
So, what about all these people going around in masks without having eyewear?
Oh, dear.
Oh, God. Reuters.
You know when they're talking, or you know when they're lying because their lips are moving, or you know when they're lying because their fingers are tapping on the keys.
Incredible. But that's what you're...
You're faced with... And all these kind of...
These Silicon Valley corporations owned by the cult are employing these fact-checkers owned by the cult to tell the population that anything that basically challenges official narrative is by definition not true.
But again...
We talked about earlier, people are getting wise to it.
And it's starting to have a reverse effect.
When your Reuters and these other clowns start telling you that, oh no, people are more likely now, people with a brain on active duty are much more likely to look at the story sympathetically if this crowd are trying to discredit it.
Well, that's become more obvious that that's the case.
So what they've done, obviously they control the mainstream media completely.
They control Silicon Valley.
So it's what you can and can't post.
They stick these fact checkers on stuff to try and deter people from seeing stuff.
And yet people are still waking up and people are still asking questions, which is fantastic.
So now they need to go for the demonization dad.
So if you question...
It's always coming, Gazza!
And it's so predictable.
It's the same one. It was like counting down to something.
So if you question a vaccine, you know, or you question the safety, bearing in mind this lad's just died in Brazil, so you question a vaccine, then you're an anti-Semite.
79% of you are anti-Semites who question vaccines.
Like I say, you know, five, four, three.
It was a countdown.
I'm surprised it took him so long.
This is a report.
Well, it's not.
It's an alleged report.
And it's been authored by Lord Man, Baron Man.
Ooh. He must be important.
He must be intelligent.
No. Baron Mann is actually the former Labour MP. John Mann.
And John Mann has a long history of attacking anyone, including members at the time, in his own Labour Party, for anything that in any way questions Israel.
And so it was no surprise that he stood down as a Labour MP to be appointed by the government, wait for this guys, as the government's independent advisor on anti-semitism For independent and John Mann, Lord Mann, to be used in the same sentence is...
I mean, you know, it's hilarious.
But let's look at what this guy said.
And this is a report from the Jewish Chronicle, which is edited by a very strange man called Stephen Pollard, who appears not to like me.
What's not to like?
Anyway... New report warns that 79% of anti-vaccination networks host Jewish hate.
So, if you are questioning and are concerned about the possible dangers of vaccines to your child's health, you, by definition, it appears here, at least 79%, hate Jewish people.
And that is...
When I talk about the countdown, I mean, the countdown that was always coming, where you equate people challenging the virus narrative and the vaccine narrative with antisemitism.
Because, you know, as I... Explained at length and revealed at length in the books.
There's something that I call the anti-Semitism industry, which has nothing to do with protecting Jewish people from discrimination.
They could care less. It's about using alleged discrimination against Jewish people when it's not to silence and demonize people.
That's what it's all about.
And the other thing... Of course, and we've touched on this before, is that suddenly, out of nowhere, we have organizations, like this bloke, Mann, who is the independent...
Sorry, it's funny.
Government advisor on antisemitism, and we talked about the Centers for Digital Hate Organization and this bloke Imran Ahmed, how they have seamlessly, in this period of the pandemic hoax, moved from targeting people for alleged racism To targeting them for challenging the virus narrative.
So what on...
I'll give you some quotes from Matt in this report.
What's the anti-Semitism advisor of the government got to do with anti-vaxxers and stopping conspiracy theories and anti-vaccination organisations?
So... He says a new report has called for the government to urgently tackle a, quote, resurgence of antisemitism.
It always is.
Within the fast-growing anti-vaccination movement.
And he says that...
Exposing the level of anti-Semitism amongst anti-vaxxers is of the utmost importance.
Okay, so we have an economic global catastrophe with people in desperate straits.
We have fascism sweeping across the world and we have people wearing masks and not breathing in enough oxygen and yet The devastating intellect that is Lord Mann says that of utmost importance amid all this is exposing the level of anti-Semitism among the anti-vaxxer movement.
And it says that it will be essential Essential, says Mann.
To quickly sideline the conspiracy theories and misinformation of the anti-vaxxers.
Okay, produce evidence that it's misinformation.
Never done. Never done.
Because they can't do it. Billions and billions of dollars have been paid out by the vaccine court in America.
Taxpayers, because they've given immunity from prosecution to the drug companies producing the vaccines.
Billions paid out for people who have been damaged by vaccines or killed by vaccines.
And yet, it's misinformation that there's any danger from vaccines.
You are a disgrace, Lord Mann.
You're another one.
I don't know how he shaves in the morning without averting his eyes.
The study has been sent to all government departments And it warns that exposing the level of anti-Semitism of utmost importance And that the government needs to urgently tackle the growth of conspiracy theories during the pandemic if the public are to remain trustful and confident in public health guidelines and recommendations.
So here is the fake left of centre former MP, John Mann, who's supposed to be representing at his period as a Labour MP, Brassett Law.
Protecting the interests of working people and lower income people.
We've all been massively, massively affected by this.
And he's saying that we must basically censor people challenging the narrative and questioning vaccines To let the public remain trustful and confident of public health guidelines.
In other words, assets of the system and what they say.
The Labour Party created by Keir Hardie at the turn of the 20th century to challenge the establishment and his man, absolutely establishment to his DNA. Saying that we must stop challenge to the system so that people will still have confidence in doing what the system tells them.
God, it's unbelievable.
And most people are desperate for a safe and effective vaccine for COVID-19.
Well, they're getting fewer and that's why these people are getting worried.
As are governments across the world, yeah, all controlled by the same global network.
Once a vaccine becomes available, it will be essential, says man, brain of Britain, and Israel, essential to quickly sideline conspiracy theories and misinformation of the anti-vaxxers.
So what he's telling you...
Is what is obviously in the script.
The closer they get to playing out this vaccine, the more people questioning it and vaccine dangers and the danger of this particular one are going to be targeted and demonized and silenced.
Send the man a mirror.
He won't look at it at night, but it's worth a try.
And this report says...
Exposing the links to anti-Semitism and age-old conspiracy theories can only assist the public health message.
But in doing so, government and civil society organizations must also combat the resurgence of anti-Semitism that, as this report evidences, it does not.
It's present in 79% of anti-vax networks.
And this document, Gaz, they spent a lot of time on it.
It's so in-depth.
In fact, it's 20 pages long.
Yeah. The 20-page document from anti-bactus to anti-semitism conspiracy theory to the COVID-19 pandemic includes shocking examples, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
So... It's as predictable as the sun coming up in the morning.
These people are.
Once you know how they work and you know what the agenda is, it's so predictable.
It's a head shaker. And my God, that is.
How many all-expenses-paid trips to Israel do you have to have to not be able to be considered independent?
When it comes to anti-Semitism.
Talking of predicting...
The point is, very quickly, Gaz, you know, as I've highlighted in the books, you know, Israel is actually controlled by a group called Sabbatean Frankis, who actually can't...
They hate Jewish people.
And I mentioned this.
You know, I get information from people, Jewish people in Israel, and they've been subjected to some of the fiercest, most draconian lockdowns of anywhere.
This is not about Jewish people.
This is about this cabal that controls Israel and indeed in other facets of this global web connects into this greater global picture.
People have been standing up in Israel, though.
I've seen a fair bit of that, which has, you know, made me feel good.
Taken to the streets and not having it.
What I was going to say, though, in terms of predictability, Joe Biden's corrupt dad.
I don't think anyone saw that coming at any point ever.
I can't believe it.
Uncle Joe? No.
But... This subject brings it all together really.
We have had this laptop, this Hunter Biden his son's laptop.
Not hacked into, but he left it at a bloody shop and then didn't pick it up.
And it passed the point where it became the property of the shop because they unpaid the bill.
And what was on the hard drive is absolutely devastating.
But it gets more devastating because as we record this, the story has been breaking of a Hunter Biden business partner who's now gone public.
And pointed out that Joe Biden, in effect, was getting payoffs from his son's involvement in Ukraine and with an energy company in Ukraine, but also with China and the Chinese government, because anything in China is the Chinese government.
And that...
He was getting payoffs at a time when he was vice president to Obama of the United States and able to influence foreign policy, policy towards China, policy towards Ukraine.
And he's actually admitted on tape that he had a prosecutor fired in Ukraine because The actual prosecutor was involved in an investigation into the energy company, Burisma, that Hunter Biden was highly paid to represent, in other words, to use the influence of his father to help the company.
But now it's moved to China, and the same has been going on in China, and we're talking massive amounts of money.
And this business partner has come out, And said it's all true.
And that Joe Biden absolutely knew about it, which he's been denying, ludicrously denying, for years.
And so, what we have, when I say it's all pulled together, is this fantastic revelation about a man who could be President of the United States in a few days.
And the media, I mean people like Tucker Carlson on Fox News etc apart, the rest of the media have been ignoring the story where they can and where they can't saying it's a Russian hoax.
When you're talking the hard drive of a laptop that has been admitted Belong to Hunter Biden.
And now you've got the business partner coming out and confirming it all.
The man should step down for running for president.
But instead, his back's being watched by the media that are no longer even paying lip service to journalism.
They are people who are simply driving an agenda, and they know it.
And it's extraordinary that a man in the midst of these amazing revelations, confirmation of mega-corruption, Should still be running for president and may well become president.
I wonder if they're just relying on there being enough, you know, never Trumpers to get Biden over the line.
Or whether they're thinking, well, at the end of the day, we'll throw Biden under the bus if we have to nearer to the day and people will still vote Democrat because they hate Trump.
I'd be shocked if Trump doesn't walk it.
I know it's all pantomime anyway, obviously, for people listening.
I'm not buying into it because it's all pantomime.
But I would be surprised with all this stuff coming out.
And there's other stuff as well.
I was reading about there being images on this laptop as well, which could get really...
That takes it to a whole other level.
Yeah, exactly. But the thing is that what they've done is they've given Biden the nomination.
and then use the virus excuse to keep him because obviously he's got massive cognitive problems in well documented and well documented by him whenever he speaks virtually that they've used the virus hoax to keep him out of the public eye where he is in any way interacting with the public and You know, there's videos galore of him walking into shot to the podium And apparently addressing, you know, an event.
And then when the camera pulls back, there's nobody there.
There's nobody there.
He's walked into an empty car park with a podium.
And in front of him is this absolutely massive screen with his words going down, a massive teleprompter, which he just reads.
And this situation that's just emerged is being dealt with in the same way.
He's not responding to it.
The Democratic Party are just saying it's a Russian hoax, ludicrous.
And they think that if they just keep their heads down, and most of the media, most of the media, your CNNs, your MSNBCs, etc., your New York Times, that keep as much, who are read and watched overwhelmingly by Trump, potential Democratic voters that if they can keep this story from circulating enough then they can stop it being the end of his presidential run which it should be and as it was pointed out in a A television show I was watching this morning.
About 40 million people have already voted in the election.
Oh, I've got a brush going up and down here.
Are you having your windows cleaned?
Yeah, I didn't even know the windows were cleaned.
I've not seen this for ages.
I can't remember it, but suddenly the windows are being cleaned.
What an insight that is for people watching, Dad.
Live footage of you having your windows cleaned.
Amazing. Yeah.
Oh, he's gone now. He's gone now.
There was something I noticed as well, Dad, with the debate.
They muted Trump, didn't they?
And they said it was so that he couldn't interrupt.
I wonder if it was that or if it was a case of if at any point he started nailing on the Hunter Biden stuff that the microphone could be muted, you know?
Yeah, well, I mean, it's all being manipulated.
But, you know, in the end, it is a pantomime.
And the people really in charge will be in charge whichever one wins.
I think the, you know, if we bring it down to that presidential election level...
Which is very low level compared with where the power is, of course.
At least Trump has a constituency.
But having said that, if he wins this election, then he won't have to win another one.
But at least it is a constituency that wants, for instance, freedom of speech, that doesn't want this great woke agenda, i.e.
the 1% agenda, being imposed on America.
So he has to at least pay some lip service and do some pushback.
Whereas if Biden-Harris get in, well...
Within a year, two years, at absolute outside, what is left of what we call America will be gone.
Because these are empty shells.
He's a cognitive empty shell, and she's a moral empty shell.
And they will just do whatever.
Well, says Biden, so I'll come to that.
But they will just be vehicles for the full-blown woke agenda, which will include massive censorship and silencing of opposition to be played out, and America will be transformed.
They'll turn America into California, won't they?
Basically. Because California's beyond hope.
I've been talking to a mate, Dino, who's been there, and he said it's like nothing you've ever seen in your life.
I've been to California so many times in the last 25 years.
And I've watched it transform.
California was great.
When I first was going there in the 1990s, California was great.
You know, San Francisco was a beautiful city.
And it was a real pleasure.
I always look forward to going to California.
But the cult-owned...
Government of California, this extraordinarily dark man, Newsom, has just transformed the place into a nightmare for most of the population.
And that is exactly what they want to do.
They want to transfer California to the rest of America.
And because they...
Biden and Harris do not have the need to push back against that because their natural constituency wants that or has been manipulated to want that.
He doesn't know what the consequences are for it, which are coming.
Then that process will happen far faster under them than it would under Trump, who does have a constituency he has to at least to some level pander to.
So we're going to chat next week then, Dad.
So, what's going to happen in the next week?
It's weird, isn't it? What are we going to talk about next week?
Normally, when we would do this in the past, you'd have a little bit of an idea of something that you want to talk about, but it's madness, isn't it?
So, I'm off this week.
I was supposed to be going to Scotland on a whisky tour.
It's been booked for a year with my mate for his 40th, but the great Nick Tater has stepped in and ruined that, so I'm going to walk in the South Downs instead.
So, We'll just keep looking out for what's going to happen over the next week then, Dad, and then we'll go and have a chat about how mad everything is.
Yeah, and we can be sure of one thing, that one of the great centres of the madness...
And the dictatorship will be Scotland because of Nicola Sturgeon, the leader of Scotland, staggeringly.
And she was talking this week about the fact that children shouldn't worry because Santa is an essential worker.
And no matter what happens with regard to Christmas, he will bring their presents.
This is spoken by a tinpot dictator who staggeringly is obeyed by vast numbers of people in Scotland.
I shake my head all the time at the very thought of that.
But here is Sturgeon who has destroyed The income and the lives of mums and dads all over Scotland Saying to the children of Scotland that Sansa will still come and bring their presents.
Well, maybe she should have added, well, at least they will in my house.
Because I go on being paid by the taxpayer for creating a human catastrophe.
And despite all that, vast numbers of people still obey me.
Anyone think it might be time to stop obeying?
▲
Export Selection