Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 12, 2020 - David Icke

28:01

Another Week, Another Twitter Ban - David Icke

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
	♪♪♪ It's another week and it's another Twitter ban.
	They are now getting utterly ludicrous and closer together.
	And so it's obviously close to the point where they're going to just delete me, like YouTube and Facebook and these other expressions of the cult that appear to be separate companies.
	So it couldn't have been more than about three weeks ago that I was banned for seven days for daring to suggest that the UK Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, Who you know when he's lying because his lips are moving.
	I suggested That he could be lying to us about what he's claiming.
	And, you know, saying that Matt Hancock is lying is a bit like saying it's cold at the Antarctic.
	I mean, you know, it's bloody obvious.
	But that's too much for Twitter.
	Well, it wasn't too much for Twitter.
	It was too much for the people that control Twitter and are trying to silence me in all directions.
	So they banned me for seven days for that.
	I was beside myself, of course.
	And then this week, it got even more ridiculous.
	When they banned me for seven days for posting a story.
	It wasn't even a story.
	It wasn't even a story about.
	It was direct to a study.
	A scientific study.
	That was suggesting actually quite an obvious thing that's actually been widely missed.
	And that is that wearing a mask, which means the study said you're breathing in more forcefully because your body's trying to get the oxygen it needs through a mask.
	So they made the very logical conclusion that when you're breathing in more deeply, that you can breathe in fibers, minute fibers from the mask, which then breathe into your lungs.
	And this is how the opening to the study started.
	There is no biological history of mass masking until the current era, which is important to consider possible outcomes of this society-wide experiment.
	Actually, it's not an experiment.
	It's part of a long-planned agenda for human control.
	The consequences to the health of individuals is as yet unknown.
	You see, there's been no risk assessment done by these governments.
	None. Why? Because if they did one, then people would be so aghast that they would refuse to use them in much greater numbers.
	Not everybody would, of course, but a lot more would refuse to wear them.
	It's the same with 5G. They don't have any risk assessments of 5G because if they did then 5G would have enormous pushback that it doesn't have now.
	So that's how they do it.
	Anyway, the consequences to the health of individuals is as yet unknown.
	Masked individuals have measurably higher inspiratory flow than non-masked individuals.
	The study is of new masks removed from manufacturer packaging as well as a laundered cloth mask examined microscopically.
	Loose particulate was seen on each type of mask Also, tight and loose fibers were seen on each type of mask.
	If every foreign particle and every fiber in every face mask is always secure and not detachable by airflow, then there should be no risk of inhalation of such particles and fibers.
	However, if even a small proportion of mask fibers is detachable by inspiratory airflow, Or if there is debris in mask manufacture or packaging or handling, all of which are a gimme, And there is a possibility of not only entry of foreign material to the airways, but also entry to deep lung tissue and potential pathological consequences of foreign bodies in the lungs.
	Now, if you cared about people, if you cared about their health Then there is no way in the world that Twitter, officially owned by this or run by this Dorsey guy, C. Zuckerberg, C. Bryn and Page and Wojcicki at Facebook, Google and YouTube.
	You would far from ban someone for seven days for posting that.
	You would be encouraging people to do it.
	And to circulate it.
	But this is nothing about health.
	We, you know, vast numbers of people now realise that.
	And so it's about control.
	And massively part of that control Is getting people to wear masks.
	Where this is going, it's happening already around the world, but where this is going in in Britain, for instance, is they want to change the law so that anyone outside their home has to wear a mask.
	And so the last thing they want is for a scientific study to expose the dangers and the fibers are one danger.
	But, of course, there's lack of oxygen and breathing in carbon dioxide, etc.
	And all the psychological subconscious effects, which I've been talking about since this whole mass thing started.
	And so we have this situation with Twitter.
	Where they've banned me for seven days for posting a scientific study about masks for no other reason than to serve the agenda of the network that owns Twitter and owns Google and owns Facebook and owns YouTube.
	To stop the people seeing information that would benefit their health and alert them to the dangers of masks because mask wearing is Is fundamentally a bottom line part of this whole agenda.
	So people like Dorsey at Twitter and all the others, Zuckerberg, Bryn, Paige, Wojcicki, you know, if humanity has any self-respect, when we get through this, and there are some There are some encouraging signs starting to appear here and there.
	The people I'm mentioning must go before Nuremberg trials for, Nuremberg type trials, for crimes against humanity.
	They must! Because they are complicit, fundamentally complicit in crimes against humanity by systematically Preventing people, the public, around the world to see what they need to see to make informed choices.
	I mean, these are psychopaths I'm talking about here.
	Big time. Because you don't do what they're doing unless you're a psychopath.
	Just quickly on the masks again.
	This is a story I posted at davidhike.com this week.
	Flashback 2016.
	Face masks didn't work then either.
	The above quotation is ascribed to Justice Archie Campbell, author of Canada's SARS Commission Final Report, which is a stark reminder that scientific knowledge is constantly changing as new discoveries contradict established beliefs.
	For at least three decades, a face mask has been deemed as an essential component.
	of the personal protective equipment worn by dental personnel.
	A current article, Face Mask Performance, Are You Protected?
	gives the impression that masks are capable of providing an acceptable level of protection from airborne pathogens.
	Studies of recent diseases such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, SARS, Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome, MERS, and Ebola, combined with those of seasonal influenza and drug-resistant tuberculosis, have promoted a better understanding of how respiratory diseases are transmitted.
	Concurrently with this appreciation, there have been a number of clinical investigations into the efficacy And of protective devices such as face masks.
	This article will describe, you can see it on davidite.com, how the findings of such studies led to a rethinking of the benefits of wearing a mask during the practice of dentistry.
	It will begin by describing new concepts related to infection control and especially personal protective equipment, or this ubiquitous term PPE equipment.
	It's an article worth reading.
	Flashback 2016. Face mask didn't work then either.
	We'll get you there in the Davidike.com search engine.
	But, you know, the only way that this is happening in all these areas, including the excuses for lockdowns, is because governments and authorities in general are lying to us And when genuine people expose those lies, increasingly more doctors and medical professionals, scientists and lawyers, I'll come to that, the governments just crack on as if nothing's been exposed.
	Why? Because they're following an agenda.
	And I heard this week someone asking, If that which is driving the UK government policy on COVID-19 could possibly be international.
	Well, I nearly fell off my seat.
	I mean, I've only spent 30 years pointing out the international network that is driving governments all over the world.
	And there's no more blatant example of it than what we're seeing since the turn of 2020.
	So the only way that you can protect lies from being demolished is by censorship.
	And here's... Oh my God, there's so much of that.
	You know, I mean, the Twitter bans that keep giving me for ludicrous reasons are a testament to it.
	But here's Bill Gates.
	Bill Gates... Who is a psychopath to the world of almost unimaginable proportions.
	Bill Gates calls for big tech to implement smart solutions that slow the spread of misinformation.
	No, he's not demanding that he himself is censored.
	Because in this inverted world, lies become truth and truth become truth.
	Disinformation. During an interview at the Wall Street Journal Summit in London, investor and philanthropist is not a philanthropist at all.
	Philanthropy is just the cover for taking the vast amounts of money that he has accrued through Microsoft, which is a cult company, not a Gates company, just fronts up and becomes enormously rich as a result.
	Philanthropy is just the means through which assets of the cult, like Bill Gates, use the money accrued because they are assets of the cult to fund the agenda of the cult while calling it philanthropy.
	In the answer recently published, I wrote the first 80-85% of the book before this whole thing kicked off.
	And Gates got many mentions, even before the pandemic kicked off.
	And I then covered that and cover that in the book.
	But before that, many, many mentions because I was laying out the agenda that was planned for humanity.
	Boxes galore ticked since the pandemic hoax was played.
	And Gates is funding one after the other.
	Because he's generated so much money through Microsoft, he has the means to do this through the illusion of philanthropy.
	And so what you get is these assets, Gates, Soros, Bezos at Amazon, etc.
	They make vast amounts of money because they're cult assets.
	But the rider is that vast amounts of that money have to be spent funding the cult agenda under the guise of philanthropy.
	That's why the Rockefeller family started the The Rockefeller Foundation.
	No other reason than to fund the agenda behind the screen of philanthropy.
	And Bill Gates, who is very, very close to the Rockefellers, and that Gates family has been for a long time.
	Indeed, I have seen Genealogy that claims that if you go back far enough, then the Gates family and the Rockefeller family fuse.
	Bill Gates said that his Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was inspired by and Well, of course it was, because they are both seeking the same ends.
	So during this interview with the Wall Street Journal, or at the Wall Street Journal Summit in London, Gates complained that the suggestions of suppressing conspiracy theories and misinformation on big tech platforms are less creative than we need at this point, and called for smart solutions.
	When asked about the role of tech platforms when it comes to dealing with misinformation, Gates lamented what he described as a human weakness for titillating things, such as claims that the coronavirus is man-made or there is some conspiracy.
	Now, what he means is, of course, and this is good news, really, that The information, despite the censorship thus far, has circulated enough for enormous numbers of people to realize what Gates is doing, to realize that he's a super, super psychopath, and that he wants every man, woman, and child on the planet to be vaccinated with his vaccine for a very dark, sinister reason.
	Now, that is becoming clear.
	More and more people are realizing that this is a scam.
	I mean, if you go back to an interview that I did with London Real on April the 6th, indeed go one back indeed to the middle of March, and what's in those interviews is exactly what's played out ever since.
	Because it's all...
	Long planned. And what's happening with every week, the month that passes, is more and more people are starting to see that what I was saying in those interviews is actually what's happening.
	And thus, how did he know? Well, because it's a script.
	And if you access the script, you can say what's going to happen with great accuracy.
	And so this has been real bad news for Gates and the cult.
	Because more and more people are sussing them.
	And so this is what this is about.
	Calling for more and more censorship is they're terrified.
	They're being exposed.
	And now as I'll come to in a second, you've got lawyers and others who are coming to the fore to take this on.
	Because it's dawned on them that it's a scam.
	And... I think that the lawyer thing is very important, just quickly, because these people, Gates not the least, have to appear before Nuremberg trials to be charged for crimes against humanity.
	All of them. So...
	Gates added that social media platforms allow this type of content to spend very quickly.
	That stuff spreads so much faster than the truth.
	Bill Gates and the truth in the same sentence, staggering.
	Which is, you know, it comes from a bat, you know, we're still trying to figure out the exact path of transmission.
	You don't forward that the same way that you would a conspiracy.
	What he's saying is they're taking their time and Trying to be, you know, careful in what they say about the virus.
	Because alleged virus.
	And that doesn't get around as much as a conspiracy.
	Well, it just so happens that the entire global media, Mr.
	Psychopath Gates, and the entirety of Silicon Valley, which you are, of course, a prominent psychopathic member, has done nothing But promote your story of the virus, alleged virus, since this all began.
	So I've been saying since way back, if you want to get close to the truth, at least close to the truth, take everything these people say and invert it, reverse it.
	Because that's what they do. It's not that they just lie.
	It's that they operate on the law, the psychological law of inversion.
	Whatever they say is the opposite of what it is.
	So just one simple example in terms of symbolism.
	The population perceive the dove as a symbol of peace.
	Whereas in version, the cult uses the dove as a symbol of the Babylonian goddess Semiramis.
	In other words, a symbol of all the horrors that they wish to perpetrate on humanity.
	And this works right across.
	Why do they invert the cross, this cult and its Satanists?
	They invert it because they invert everything.
	This is why the satanic symbol of the five-pointed star, the pentagram, is inverted.
	They invert everything.
	Everything's turned on its head, including what they say.
	Gates also stated that vaccine hesitancy predates the pandemic.
	And suggested that the U.S. should be thinking about which voices which will help reduce the hesitancy.
	In other words, lie to us and some more and silence those that are exposing the lies.
	I mean, you know, this man must reincarnate at least 100 times to complete the sentence.
	So... You can expect more censorship to come because they are now getting desperate.
	This is why the laws are becoming more fascistic and the censorship is becoming more fascistic.
	It's because they are getting desperate, because while vast chunks of the human population have, as usual, bought whatever they're told and believed it, those that haven't are gathering and gathering and gathering, and these people are cancelling the laxative order.
	And here we have an example.
	Government rejects call to end lockdown measures.
	This comes as a result of scientists coming out.
	I'll come to the lawyers in a moment.
	But scientists coming out in Britain and calling for an end to lockdown measures.
	And because the British government is owned by the Gates network, he's just a gopher, but he's right up there at the gopher level.
	Because the UK government is controlled by them, then of course they've got to reject what scientists say that is not good for the agenda, i.e.
	stop lockdowns. So this is a story.
	Downing Street has rejected a call of the Great Barrington Group of scientists for an end to lockdown measures, saying their argument rests on an unproven assumption that it would be possible to protect the vulnerable.
	What they're basically saying is instead of putting healthy people under house arrest and restriction, destroying the economy, destroying lives, destroying health, then protect the vulnerable.
	Which is, funnily enough, what I said right at the start of this in the first London Real interview in March, mid-March, before it became clear to me.
	I had an idea then, but I wasn't going to go public on it because I needed to do more research.
	But before I concluded, soon after that first interview, that there was no virus and that the PCR test It was a scam in the way it was being used.
	I said in that first London Real interview exactly that.
	Why are we going to destroy the economy and the economic consequences would be the legacy of this rather than health?
	Just, if you say these people are vulnerable, then protect them.
	But don't force healthy people under house arrest.
	But of course, the idea, you've got to force healthy people under house arrest.
	So you destroy the economy, because that's the idea.
	Create dependency on the state.
	So the controversial...
	See this.
	This is in the so-called independent, which is another inversion.
	The last thing the independent is in Britain is independent.
	The controversial Great Barrington Declaration, controversial meaning not that the science makes sense, but that it's at odds with the government narrative, therefore it becomes controversial.
	The controversial Great Barrington Declaration, which has been signed by more than 7,000 scientists and medics worldwide, calls for a new strategy of allowing younger people to go about their lives as normal while offering focused protection to the elderly.
	And those with underlying medical conditions who are at most risk from the coronavirus.
	So it's claimed.
	It has won the support of UK scientists, including Professor Sikora, Professor Carroll Sikora, and Tory backbencher Steve Baker, as urged MPs to offer it their backing in a direct challenge to the government's strategy.
	But Boris Johnson's official spokesman, Bill Gates, today made clear the Prime Minister does not accept the fundamental arguments behind the demand.
	Well, he's not even read them.
	And he wouldn't dare go that way because, you see, not only is Boris Johnson Not only has he acted, again, in a deeply psychopathic way, because even someone of his mental capacity would have known from the start what the consequences were going to be of what he did for the population.
	But because he's gone with the script of the cult, if he accepts what these scientists say, then what's going to happen?
	He's going to be accepting that everything that he's done up to this point and the catastrophe that he's created was a mistake.
	So these people, including Hancock, the health secretary, and all these people in America like Fauci, they're doubling down and doubling down on what they've been doing because Of the consequences for them of saying, actually, we probably made a mistake.

▲