All Episodes
July 29, 2020 - David Icke
26:21
Covid 19 - The Fake Pandemic - David Icke
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
so so
and at this upcoming election americans have got the quote choice between a woke democratic party
which will destroy everything that we've come to know as america and donald trump who is um
defrauding his own supporters by saying one thing and doing another again and again and again
So what a choice to make in November.
And what I've said about the vaccine and Its connection to sterilization, there are many other things as well, which I describe in the answer, very much explains why there is this pressure on the population to have the vaccine.
And like I say, what they want, ideally, is it to be mandatory and If they can't get enough people to acquiesce to that, then their plan is, they'll say, and I've been saying this for months, by the way, that lockdown goes on until you have the vaccine.
And making the vaccine appear to work is so easy when there is no virus.
Because The amount of testing, and most importantly, the level of amplification of the test dictates whether people test positive, not for the virus, for this genetic material, in large numbers or small numbers.
So what they do is they take a tiny amount of this RNA genetic material, and they amplify it basically blow it up in simple terms and the more they blow it up the more of this genetic material is picked up by the test and so the more people will test positive low amplification low test positives high amplification high test positives so um people have the vaccine and and and suddenly you change the way that you administer the test and it appears that the vaccine Is having an effect in stopping people getting the, quote, disease that actually doesn't exist.
And what you do then is your death numbers, which you are gathering by redesignating people dying of other things to have died from COVID-19, you start to roll that back, and fewer people seem to be dying after the vaccine is released, and thus the vaccine's working.
This is what's planned.
Anyway, this is another story from this week.
Coronavirus restrictions will remain if large numbers refuse vaccine warns a UK task force.
And much of this is coming out of the UK globally, by the way.
Coronavirus restrictions will remain in place if large numbers of people refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine, a UK task force has warned.
There are fears that millions of Britons may opt out of being vaccinated for coronavirus, with many swayed by debunked anti-vax claims spread online.
They've not been debunked at all.
I mean, the media are so disgusting, it's unbelievable.
And they've got kids and grandkids.
And they're working every day to enslave them and to put total toxic shite in their bodies.
It's staggering what these people do called journalists.
A number of scientific studies have debunked previous claims by anti-vaxxers, including the false claims that the MMR jab can cause autism.
That has not been debunked at all.
But two recent surveys show a large proportion of Britons are either against a coronavirus vaccine or unsure about taking one.
You know why, writer of this article?
Because they're more intelligent than you are.
On Monday, the government announced that it had signed deals with pharmaceutical companies to secure 90 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines.
So how have they produced this vaccine so unbelievably quick?
In fact, they're bragging about how quickly they've done it because it was it was all sitting there.
The one they're going to use was all sitting there before they played the pandemic hoax.
They've just had to delay the time of introducing it a little bit.
for credibility purposes because it normally takes years to develop a vaccine,
even those that cause incredible harm to people.
That's on top of that 90 million doses, on top of the 100 million doses of
an Oxford University vaccine being developed by the company AstraZeneca.
The findings from its first human trials published on Monday showed its vaccine is safe and induces an immune reaction.
Well, when you put shite in a vaccine, the immune system is going to react.
But if you've not isolated the virus you claim you're targeting to show it exists and it's not been done, how can you produce something to counter it?
You surely have to isolate in its totality free of all other contamination what you say is the target quote virus before you can find a vaccine for it.
But it's not a vaccine for a virus.
It's a vaccine for an agenda.
And not only are we having these What nearly 200 million doses of this various forms of this vaccine being ordered by the British government, the American government is doing the same in obviously greater numbers with a greater population.
Kate Bingham, chair of the government's vaccine task force is someone to trust.
Criticise those backing anti-vaxxers.
Vaccination has been an incredibly positive force for good in global society, and they're not helping themselves or others by pushing an anti-vax message.
And they're certainly not doing any help to us who want to vaccinate the world.
If large numbers, this Kate Bingham says, refuse to have it, I think, yes, there's an issue.
And of course, this is classic.
If you do what we tell you, then it's voluntary.
It's just your choice.
If you don't do what we tell you, we're going to make it mandatory.
And you can see documents from these population behavior manipulation organizations, like the behavioral insights team that operates out of the British cabinet office in Whitehall near Downing Street, where they actually say that.
You get them to volunteer to do what you do and if they don't then you make it mandatory.
So this is the idea Bingham said, if large numbers refuse to have the vaccine, I think, yes, there is an issue.
We are now living in a world where we don't have millions of children dying in childhood.
The last case of smallpox was in 1970s.
Polio is very rare.
I explain in the answer why those diseases fell in number.
And it wasn't vaccines.
So this is the agenda to force people, either through lockdown rules or mandatory vaccinations, to have the punchline of this pandemic hoax, which is The whole global population vaccinated with this, what will be, horrific vaccination.
And of course, people like Matt Hancock, he's the health secretary.
What a joke. He knows nothing about health.
Matt Hancock, the Health Secretary in Britain, and his like around the world in all the other countries, United States and so on, is targeting anti-vaxxers.
And he's come out this week.
Well, of course he has.
I mean, these people like Hancock, Clueless Man, and Boris Johnson, they're spectators.
They're not driving this policy at all.
They're just reading the scripts.
So Health Secretary Matt Hancock has warned that conspiracy theorists are putting lives at risk.
This is a man, along with Johnson, who introduced lockdowns for no reason whatsoever in terms of health that have killed and will go on killing untold numbers of people.
Who through the lockdowns were not getting diagnosis or treatment and now it will be too late.
Some in the medical profession are coming out and openly saying that.
And this man has such a deletion of shame that having done that, he can say that conspiracy theorists about vaccinations are killing people.
Putting lives at risk.
So, he's going on about Experts warning that anti-vaccination campaigners could frighten people so much they resist inoculation even when it is perfectly safe.
Prove to me it's perfectly safe.
Why, if vaccines are perfectly safe, has $4.2 billion already been paid out by the vaccine court in America with an extraordinarily high bar to prove the case that the vaccine caused your problem?
A new poll organised by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine found that more than one in four Britons said they would not take a coronavirus vaccine or were still undecided.
It's such a blatant attack on human psychology that's going on here.
And it's nothing to do with the science.
It's nothing to do with reality.
It's only to do with this agenda that Gates is fronting up on behalf of those that own him.
Now, this is an interesting story.
You know, I was attacked, indeed, officially, deleted from YouTube and Facebook because I was talking about a connection between coronavirus symptoms Not the virus called COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, because that doesn't exist.
But the symptoms claimed for it were able to be generated by 5G. And they said that I was banned because of that reason.
The real reason they banned me is because I was saying there's no virus.
That's the thing that absolutely twists their knickers.
On a monumental scale.
So anyway, this is a study posted on the website of the United States National Library of Medicine, the National Center for Biotechnology Information.
And this is what it says, 5G technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells.
And in the abstract at the top, it says, in this research, we show that 5G millimeter waves could be absorbed by dermatologic cells acting like antennas.
This is what I've been going on about.
I explained this in the answer. How the skin is an antenna that interacts with frequencies, particularly powerfully with 5G, which is why the American, Israeli and other military around the world have these trucks when they want to disperse crowds that fire out a frequency within the 5G range, which is decoded by the skin of the protesters To make it feel like their skin is on fire.
And they scatter to get away from it.
So 5G and the skin, which is an antenna, have a fundamental relationship.
Here we have this scientific study that is confirming this.
So the cells acting like antennas Transferred to other cells and played the main role in producing coronaviruses in biological cells.
DNA is built from charged electrons and atoms and has an inductor-like structure.
This structure could be divided into linear toroid and round inductors.
Inductors interact with external electromagnetic waves, move and produce some extra waves within the cells.
The shapes of these waves were similar in shapes of hexagonal and pentagonal bases in their DNA source.
These waves produced some holes in liquids within the nucleus.
To fill these holes, some extra hexagonal and pentagonal bases are produced.
These bases could join to each other and form virus-like structures Such as coronavirus.
To produce these viruses within a cell, it is necessary that the wavelength of external waves be shorter than the size of the cell.
Thus, 5G millimeter waves could be good candidates for applying in constructing virus-like structures, such as coronaviruses, brackets COVID-19, within the cells.
And the thing that I make this point in the answer, As 5G is rolled out more and more, in the initial stages, it's nothing like as powerful and impacting upon people as it is as more and more 5G devices come into use.
Because every time you activate a device, in this case a 5G device, you're setting up basically a frequency connection with the source.
And the more that do it in areas, the more 5G frequencies deluge that area.
Imagine people on a train, lots of people on a train using 5G devices.
That train is going to be deluged with 5G frequencies.
And the more that 5G comes in, the more impact for these reasons it's going to have on human health and human psychology.
So here we have a scientific study connecting Coronavirus symptoms, in effect, to 5G. And I was banned, at least officially, from YouTube and Facebook for saying exactly the same.
One of the themes of the answer that comes in many various forms Is the understanding of how waves, electromagnetic waves, affect people in ways that the overwhelmingly vast majority have no idea.
but the cult does. And let's come back to this situation that I've been going on
about now for months, that there is no virus.
A lady called Christine Massey, who has written articles at davidite.com, she used the Freedom of Information Act to ask the National Research Council of Canada for any evidence That the SARS-CoV-2 alleged virus had been isolated, purified, and shown to exist.
And I'll come to their reply in a second.
But I just want to make this point.
Every time I post something about there being no virus and it's not being isolated or purified to show it exists, You get people coming back and saying, well, here's a paper says it has been isolated.
But isolation in accordance with these papers and isolation to show the virus exists, not the same thing.
I get sent paper after paper.
Oh, it has been isolated, but that all these papers and the studies They talk about are using the same scam.
Most of them won't even know it's a scam.
But this is how it works.
They take cells, which they say are diseased cells.
They say they're diseased from this, whatever they claim it is.
In this case, this virus.
And they put them in a culture dish and they deprive them of nutrients.
They deprive the cells of nutrients.
It's part of the process.
They also add antibiotics, which are obviously very bad.
I mean, they can have last resort uses, but they're very bad for the cells.
And so what starts to happen, you'll be staggered to hear this, is the cells start to decay.
And they then say the decay of the cells is caused by the virus.
Which they've never isolated.
But they call this process isolation in some of the papers.
It's pathetic. Now, what would you do if you cared about the truth?
You would go through that process with disease cells, which you say are caused by a virus you've never isolated, and you'd watch what happened.
Take away their nutrients.
What do you think is going to happen then?
And you put antibiotics and stuff like that and they start to decay.
What you would then do is you would take healthy cells And you would put them through the same process and see if their healthy cells decayed in the same way.
And if they did, then it's not a, quote, virus that's causing the decay.
It's the process you're using.
Do you know they never do that?
They never have a control situation.
Where they see if healthy cells react like disease cells to the same laboratory process.
And so they say, we've not isolated the virus.
We've not shown it exists.
We've not got the full RNA code of the virus.
We've got none of that. But we're saying that these disease cells that we've taken out of this person are caused by what we say are caused by it.
So what we do is we're going to put them in this dish and we're going to take all the nutrients away and we're going to add antibiotics and goodness knows what else.
And when those cells decay, we're going to say that's proof that it's the virus that we say is causing it, but we've never shown to exist.
I am not kidding you.
This is what happened.
So let's go back to the response from the National Research Council of Canada to this Freedom of Information Act.
I think it's Freedom of Information Act request from Christine Massey.
And this is it.
Dear Christine Massey, this letter is in response to the request you made to the National Research Council.
Under the Access for Information Act for records pertaining to, quote, all records in the possession, custody or control of the National Research Council of Canada, NRC, describing the isolation of a SARS-CoV-2 virus directly from a sample taken from a disease patient Where the patient sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material, i.e. monkey kidney cells, acavero cells, liver cancer cells.
Please note that I am using isolation.
This is Christine Massey's questions and what she wanted.
Please note that I'm using isolation in the everyday sense of the word, the act of separating a thing or things from everything else.
I am not requesting records where isolation of SARS-CoV-2 refers instead to the culturing of something or the performance of an amplification test, i.e.
a PCR test, or the sequencing of something.
Please also note that my request is not limited to records that were authorized or authored by the NRC or that pertain to work done by the NRC. My request includes any sort of record, for example, but not limited to, any published peer review study that the NRC has downloaded or printed.
If any records match the above description of requested records and are currently available to the public elsewhere, please provide enough information about each record so that I may identify and access each record with certainty, i.e. title, authors, date, journal, where the public may access it.
So this was the reply from the National Research Council of Canada.
Your request was received by the NRC on June 13, 2020 and your application fee was received and processed on June 19, 2020.
A thorough research of the NRC's records has now been completed and we regret to inform you that no records responsive to your request were identified.
Export Selection