Tell Them To Shove It - Or It Will Just Get Worse And Worse - David Icke Dot-Connector Videocast
|
Time
Text
So, let's get started. We're going to start off with the first one. So, we're going to
start with the first one. Hello, Linux fans. I'm your host, John. And today, we're going
to be talking about the Dock Connector video cast.
Hello, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the David Icke Dock Connector video cast. Today,
we're going to be talking about the Dock Connector video cast. And today, we're going to be talking
about the Dock Connector video cast. So, let's get started.
Last week, I missed you dad, I didn't get to have a chat with you last week because you were off on holiday.
We're going to talk a lot about masks because that's the main thing at the moment, it's absolutely mental.
Where I work in the centre of Derby, it's unbelievable just looking out the window and seeing the amount of people trotting along with masks covering their faces.
So we're going to get into that, we're going to talk about lockdown, we're going to talk about loads of different things obviously as we always do.
So how are you dad, how was your trip?
It was interesting.
I think that's the mildest word I can use for it.
I thought it was crazy on the Isle of Wight.
It's clinically insane on the mainland.
And travelling through the Midlands and down to the south, staying in hotels and trying to get something to eat and all that stuff.
It was extraordinary.
But I managed, throughout that trip, not to give my name and details once.
Not to... To sanitize my hands once and not to wear a mask once, which I never will.
And I was standing at...
See how crazy it is and how people just respond.
I was in a cafe.
It was an outside cafe in Dorset.
And on the...
They created a new counter outside.
That's going to work well in the winter.
And... On the counter was a sanitizer.
As I've been traveling through different cities and towns, I've seen people constantly doing this.
And I had a look on the back while I was waiting at what was in it.
And literally two-thirds of the back of this bottle was a warning.
About how dangerous it was, ending with this should be disposed as basically a hazardous waste.
Oh yeah!
Stop the virus!
It's just extraordinary where it's gone.
And the trip finished with...
With me arriving back on the Art of White and not going to leave again in the foreseeable future.
I'll tell you why. What's been happening through this insanity is that there are two ferry companies to the Art of White from the mainland.
One's called Whitelink and they've had a policy of unless there's a hazardous waste, well A lorry carrying sanitizers, for instance, on board.
Then you stay in your car, which is fair enough because you just sit there and it's only about 35 minutes.
And the other one, Red Funnel, has been running certain routes, certain times every day where you stay in your car.
So you avoid all this crap with masks, which you otherwise have to wear to actually leave the art away.
So I booked myself back on a...
A ferry with Red Funnel.
It was three o'clock in the afternoon, which was one of their stay in your cars.
And I got an email the day before I came back saying, well, we've dropped that now.
There's only one sailing where you stay in your car.
And that was nine o'clock at night.
And the day before...
White Link had said, no more staying in your car, you've got to get out of your car.
And of course, this corresponds exactly with the imposition of wearing masks on public transport in Britain, which meant that I took the nine o'clock at night boat.
And I came back. And now, for me to leave the Isle of Wight, I would have to put a mask on to get on the ferry.
And I will not wear a face nappy just because some psychopathic prat in a dark suit in London with very few brain cells and active duty, who are front people for the real psychopaths driving this whole thing, Behaviour modification policy, because that's what the masks are all part of.
I'm not going to be told to wear a face nappy.
Sorry. So I've come back.
There's nothing that I do with my work that I can't do from here.
I've sorted out the food so that I don't have to go into shops.
And I'm simply not having it.
And if they introduce the next stage, which is you have to wear a mask in any public place, like when you're walking in the street, anywhere outside your house, well, I ain't doing that either.
And if that means going to jail, I'll go to jail.
I couldn't care less. I am a sovereign human being and I will not be told to do nonsensical, totally unsupportable things by a bunch of prats and psychopaths.
Not going to happen. No, I'm exactly the same.
I've got my food orders in as well.
I've got that in nice and early.
And that's just how it's going to be.
And I think what will happen is shops that enforce it are going to see in their daily takings a big hit.
Because I know a few shops that have come out and they've said that they're not going to enforce it.
And they'll be the ones where people go.
Because people don't want this.
It's absolutely insane.
And I saw something very interesting the other day where someone said, even if you believe the narrative, Introducing a mandatory face mask, like four months, five months into a pandemic, is like buying a pack of condoms for the baby shower.
It makes no sense.
Yeah, but it makes sense when you know what the agenda is.
It's a very good point that you raise.
The question is, why are they introducing compulsory masks now in Britain?
And it is because there is a script playing out.
And it's a psychological script.
It's being driven by the UK government's behavioural insights team, also known as the Nudge Unit, which is a private company operating out of the British Cabinet Office.
And it's...
Driving all this social distancing, the masks, and everything to do with driving people apart and imposing ridiculous rules.
Because they know that if they can get people to acquiesce to ridiculous rules, they're basically creating a docile, subservient, acquiescent population.
The more ludicrous the rule and unsupportable that people actually just follow, the more you're breaking down That resistance to this behavioral docility.
And if they had brought masks in, compulsory masks, at the start, and lots of other things that they've done progressively through this insanity, then there would have been a much bigger pushback.
The same way if they had not introduced furlough payments, which are going to end in October, they say, there would have been a massive pushback.
So they're nudging, that's the word, behavioral changes, but not so much in one go that they'll get a big resistance.
So they've been playing it out bit by bit.
Get them used to this, now we'll go here.
Get them used to that, now we'll go here.
And this explains what otherwise, you're right, is a complete contradiction.
Of why they're bringing in compulsory masks at a time when the death rates, even according to their made-up figures, are falling and falling.
This is why they're doing it, because it's a behavioural operation.
And nothing to do with health.
One of the people, Gaz, who's been really pushing for compulsory masks is a lady called Professor Susan Maichi.
Now, she's a member of the scientific advisory group for emergencies called SAGE, quite wrongly.
And they are advising scientifically the government.
Well, actually, they're not. They're driving the policy.
And people like...
The Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, the Health Secretary, Hancock.
They are simply observers, spectators reading the scripts.
We're following the science.
Yeah, well, you're not actually, but you're following what these people are telling you.
And Susan Maichi, who is, like I say, one of the people pushing this mandatory masks policy, is not a doctor.
She's not a scientist in the area of medicine or health.
She's a psychologist because it's all about behavior modification.
She's trained in experimental psychology at Oxford University, studied clinical psychology at the Institute of Psychiatry, London University, and she's a chartered clinical psychologist and chartered health psychologist And a fellow of the British Psychological Society.
That's where it's coming from.
It's nothing to do with health.
And the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has said that wearing a mask is one of the most unselfish things you can do.
And that's also massively part of this psychological operation.
And that's to get the population to attack those who refuse to acquiesce to fascism, because that's what it is.
And so you have people I've spoken to in shops since this mandatory mask wearing has been announced.
It's coming in on the 24th of July.
And they've said, look, we're not going to enforce it.
The police have to enforce it.
So people come in our shop without any masks, we're not going to say anything.
But, and here's the key, we can't stop other customers calling the police.
And this is where the psychology manipulation goes, whereby you turn the population who are acquiescing to whatever they're told and believing whatever they're told, you turn them against those that refuse to submit to fascism.
Why has Scotland acquiesced To Nicola Sturgeon, who has become a dictator, imposing her will on the fine detail of people's lives in Scotland.
We Jimmy Cranky, as she is often called.
Why has Scotland given power over the fine detail of their lives to Nicola Sturgeon?
Who is someone I would not count as one of the most intelligent people I've ever perceived.
Why? You know, I said this in a videocast, and one of the Scottish papers ran the fact that I said, where is the independent Scotland giving away its power to Nicola Sturgeon?
And many of the comments underneath from people said, oh, he thinks Scotland's independent already.
It's not. Oh, no. I wasn't talking about political independence for Scotland.
I was talking about psychological independence.
There's a lot of people, of course, in Scotland that have worked it out.
But so much of what is happening there is just sturgeon Decreeing and the population following.
It's happening in England as well, of course.
And when you see how people just give their power away to these people, who otherwise they'd say, oh, you can't trust politicians, you can't trust authorities, and then they give away their entire daily life.
To those same people.
And this is so indicative of the so-called woke left, which is not the traditional left that I was brought up in.
The woke left that has become not challengers of establishment in positions.
But apologists for it.
Scotland's a one-party state anyway.
I mean, it just is.
There's no denying that.
It is interesting about the left because it is.
So I look at people that have been tweeting against the mask.
So people like Neil Clark's, fantastic journalist.
People like Peter Hitchens. Obviously ourselves.
And when you get attacked, which you do, there's a guarantee.
So when I see people attacking Neil or attacking Peter Hitchens, I have a guarantee.
And that is when I click on their Twitter, in their bio, they will have a rose.
There'll be a Labour supporter.
And nine times out of ten, you're right.
And so this liberal...
Left is anything but liberal.
And it's so obvious that it's being completely manipulated and moved away from anything liberal.
And it's extraordinary to watch, I have to say.
And some of the vile attacks on Neil Clarke of people watching this go to his Twitter and just look at a tweet he says about masks and look at the comments underneath it.
It's absolutely insane.
Talking of tweets though, Dad, we were chatting off air before and I saw this late last night actually.
And this is from Sky News.
This is a reporter from Sky News.
Now, we've been saying this since the beginning.
And there's something that's always been a bit of a bugbear in mind.
So when you go on the Office of National Statistics and you look at the infection figures, death figures and stuff for the UK, it will give you the number of infected people.
So, you know, make-up figures now off the top of my head.
But say there's 100,000...
Confirmed infected. And say there's 2,000 deaths.
And then when it says recovered, it says not applicable.
And that's been a bugbear in mind the whole time.
It's like, well, why is it not applicable?
And often I thought it was a reason of, well, actually, if you say how many are recovered and you look at it, and then people are going to look at those figures and say, oh, actually, that's actually not that bad.
You know, this lockdown is insane, blah, blah.
And they're going to fight it.
So they're kind of not applicable. They sort of left it wide open.
And I thought that was a psychological reason.
But... It seems there's another reason for that, Dad.
So this guy, Roland Manthorpe, his name is, I don't know who he is, but he's a journalist for Sky News.
So he says, unbelievable.
One of the UK's leading statistical experts says an anomaly, I'm not sure it's an anomaly, is distorting death data in England.
Anyone who tests positive for COVID but later dies of any cause, that's not any illness, that's any cause, so it by bus, Um, is still included in the coronavirus death figures.
He's saying literally no one can ever recover.
Because how can you? Because I can test positive for COVID today.
And then in four months time, I fall off some scaffolding because I'm pissed out in the head and I've died of COVID. And so then I look back and I think that website saying like the national statistics saying not applicable for recovered.
And like he's saying there, like you can never recover from it.
Well, It's one of the, shall we say, little frustrations to see yourself condemned as a conspiracy theorist and a nutter.
And then eventually, months and months later, because I've been pointing this out from almost the start, To have a mainstream outlet forced by the evidence to acknowledge at least some of it.
And they present it as some revelation That they've come up with when actually people outside of the mainstream have been pointing this out all along and been abused for their trouble.
The whole thing is a mathematical administrative scam.
Supported by a test that is not testing for a virus and you put those two things together and the test will give you your cases and the more you test the more cases you're going to apparently uncover when you're not uncovering cases of a virus because you're not testing for it you're just saying you are And you're testing for a genetic material that many, many people have in their body, unless they're going to test positive.
And that gives you your cases.
And that's where all the, oh, look at the cases going up now.
Lockdown, Leicester.
Because all the cases have gone up.
Well, what have they been doing in Leicester and all these other places?
They've been testing more.
So they get more cases.
Oh, no. But that's what's going on.
That's how it's being done.
And you produce the death figures by just redesignating other causes of death in the way you've described and others as COVID-19.
And as I said, I think it was last week or the week before, the British Lung Foundation points out that in the months we're in now in the Northern Hemisphere, respiratory disease falls by 80%.
So they've gone to cases from deaths to frighten people because there's not the same amount of redesignation possibility, especially in the direct relationship to respiratory disease.
But once the winter months come, And people start coughing and sneezing and getting flu and pneumonia, they're going to, of course, be hysterical.
Everything that moves is going to be COVID-19, and they'll go back to terrifying people with deaths in the run-up to seeking to impose the vaccine.
So it's all a scam.
And even when we talk about the masks, Gaz, Here's a story.
Face masks mandated by UK government specifically say they don't protect against COVID-19.
Did I just read that?
I did. The same type of face masks that the UK government is mandating people wear in shops from July 24 onwards to protect against the spread of coronavirus specifically state on their packaging that they don't protect against coronavirus.
Earlier this week, the government confirmed that anyone caught not wearing a mask when entering a shop or supermarket will be subject to a police fine of £100, prompting the chair of the London Metropolitan Police Foundation to complain that this would be totally unenforceable.
At least there's one sane statement in this situation.
However, the law states that cloth masks, scarves and other textile items don't require the use of hands to hold them in place are acceptable forms of protection against COVID-19.
One problem with that, the packaging on these kind of cloth masks specifically states that they don't protect against COVID-19.
Quote, This product is not a respirator and will not provide any protection against COVID-19 or any other viruses or contaminants.
That is on the package of these masks that are being made compulsory.
And we also have this situation with the masks where, and this was pointed out to me by people that work in the shops where I go, But we're not being mandated to wear them.
The staff, but the customers are.
And you're not mandated to wear them in pups.
And transport, people involved in transport workers are not mandated to wear them, but the passengers are.
So there's contradictions everywhere.
Why? Because there's nothing to do with health and everything to do with behaviour modification and creating a subservient yes sir, no sir population.
That'll be the day where I'm sitting.
It's so obvious as well that it's the redesignation of deaths from the winter.
And you can tell that because, like you said, deaths have dropped off.
And now it's all cases. It's all cases.
So Leicester, they had one testing facility at the end of May.
They now got eight. Well, obviously you can get more cases in, aren't you?
And to prove it even more is South Africa, obviously Southern Hemisphere.
They're now in their winter and they basically had sod elk.
They had sodal. So you've got this worldwide pandemic where it's a highly contagious disease, people are flying in and out of the country left, right and centre, and no one's dying and no one's getting ill.
And then it becomes their winter and suddenly COVID-19, despite having gone all over the world, only seem to arrive in South Africa when their winter and their usual flu season and pneumonia season started.
You know, do you know what I mean? It must be a hell of a coincidence.
And I've seen quite a lot of comments.
It's all redesignation.
It's all redesignation.
And of course, vast numbers of people die every year from all causes.
So your potential to redesignate when you're saying if they test positive for COVID-19 with a test that's not testing for COVID-19, or SARS-CoV-2 as the virus is alleged to be called, the The potential for designating people to have died of something that doesn't exist is endless, and that's what's happened all over the world.
Yeah, exactly. And also where people would then suggest, well, what about excess death figures?
Well, actually, excess death figures aren't anything like as huge above the norm as they should be, given we're supposed to be in a pandemic.
And when you look at the excess deaths of 2018, there's actually not a huge difference at all.
But if I want to create excess death figures, the lockdown is a perfect way to do it.
I will stop treating people, particularly in nursing homes, people that are ill, I'll stop treating them.
I'll stop treating people with cancer.
I'll stop people coming into hospitals.
I will create a situation where people are locked in their houses and they're losing their livelihoods.
So suicide spiked about 200%.
It's very easy to create excess deaths because you just stop treating people.
You know, you don't need to go out, you know, with a hammer and start attacking people in the street.
Just don't treat people that are already ill.
Easy. Well, when you see the graphs that are now emerging, The number of deaths in 2020, compared with other years, from all causes, were virtually identical.
And then in each country, when they imposed lockdown, the deaths soared almost immediately, in country after country after country.
And they've been killing people.
By, as you say, not treating them, not diagnosing people early enough so that anything can be done.
And you look at the so-called woke left and they can't see that because they never look there.
They're supposed to be this radical anti-establishment movement when actually they get all their information from the Establishment.
And the Labour Party in Britain, which is the kind of the woke party or the Conservative Party is becoming more and more woke.
Same with Republicans following Democrats in America.
But the Labour Party has been taken over completely by woke.
And there was a story this week, and it was an interchange book.
In Parliament, which has a significance that certainly wasn't pointed out in the mainstream story.
This is the UK Health Secretary, who knows nothing about health whatsoever, Matt Hancock.
And he was challenged by the Labour Party in Parliament for not locking down the country early enough.
Takes deep breath.
Tries to hold sanity.
The graphs show that the death rates soared after lockdown and the woke Labour Party, see woke Democrats in the United States, are complaining that lockdown didn't happen soon enough.
So, Hancock's trying to talk himself out of all this.
But anyway, this is what the story says.
Hancock attempted to bat away Labour Party questions, highlighting comments from Sir Patrick Vallance, the government's chief scientific advisor, longtime executive of Blackstone Smith-Kline, which has enormous financial and other connections to Bill Gates, in which Vallance suggested that SAGE, this scientific advisory group, Behavioural Science Group, really.
Advise ministers on March the 16th to move to a full lockdown as soon as possible.
So people would have started dying earlier then.
That would have been good, wouldn't it?
So Shadow Health Secretary from the Labour Party, John Ashworth, questioned why there was a seven-day delay in taking such a decision with party colleague one Zahra Sultana, Coventry South, Warning, this could have cost thousands of lives.
Now, a more idiotic, moronic statement, as I sit here, I find it more difficult to comprehend when deaths soared after lockdown in country after country.
But why is this debate going on?
And why are they saying, didn't lockdown quick enough?
Because they're planning a second wave, particularly through the late autumn into the winter months.
And what they want to do is lock down in extreme ways immediately.
Oh, we're not going to make the mistake we did last time.
We're going to lock down immediately.
And this is what it's all about.
These people involved in this debate won't have a clue why this is being pushed.
And this whole theme of we didn't lock down early enough is being pushed.
But that's why it's being pushed.
So that they can go straight into extreme lockdown.
Immediately they start fiddling the figures in terms of deaths again.
Yeah, and they'll close the hospitals again.
So people won't get treatment again.
And what happens, particularly in the United States with that, is if a hospital is empty, it's not getting any money.
So I run a hospital and I can't take in patients, can't take in cancer patients, can't take in heart patients.
So I'm not getting any money. And I've got wages to pay and I've got bills to pay and overheads.
And so I get people that come in with some kind of pneumonia or flu-like symptoms or whatever.
And I'm aware of the fact that if I put them on a COVID diagnosis, I'm going to get a shed load of money.
And if I stick them on a respirator, I'm going to get a serious shed load of money.
39 grand, $39,000.
So I've got to pay for my hospital to exist and I've got to pay my staff's wages and I've got to pay for my nice holiday in the Bahamas.
So stick them on it for half an hour.
Do you know what I mean? It's 39 grand.
Stick them on it for half an hour. The survival rate in New York for people that were put on a respirator was less than 10%.
90% of people put on respirators died.
How many of those people are being put on there because it's 39 grand?
Well, a lot of them, and the ventilator is the last resort, because it kills a lot of people, because their lungs can't cope with it, especially if they're in some respiratory distress, and that's highly likely, to say the least.
Then a ventilator can do for them.
And you've seen doctors in America and medical staff who've come out and pointed out that between someone having a respiratory problem and a ventilator, there's a series of other much less extreme and intrusive things that can be done to get oxygen into the body.
And they've explained how the hospitals have banned them From going through that sequence, and in the words of one whistleblower, we now have to let the patients crash and put them straight onto a ventilator.
So all this is going on, and you see all the psychological problems and distress that are happening to children.
And I just ask people, how much more are you going to take?
You see, when I said at the start of this that I'm not going to wear a mask, a face nappy for some dark suit who just tells me I have to with no supporting reason whatsoever, I know I have a lifestyle where I can do that and there's other people that have to go to work on public transport and so on and they have to go into shops to Shop for their families and food, etc. I get that.
You know, I'm not being holier than thou here and saying, look, I'm not doing it.
Why are you doing it? I bloody understand why you're doing it.
What I would say is this.
Unless there is resistance, pushback and refusal to acquiesce Then it ain't stopping here.
It's going to get more and more extreme.
At what point is enough enough?
Intelligent people, there has to be a point where you start to see that this is rolling on and rolling on.
And every time we acquiesce, reluctantly maybe...
But every time we acquiesce to the next imposition, they'll move on to the next imposition, which will be more extreme.
Look at what's happened in the last few months.
Exactly that sequence has taken place.
Push the gate, no resistance.
Next gate, push that gate, no resistance.
Push that gate. And we've seen with people who did Go on to beaches a few weeks ago in a very hot period in vast numbers.
And they called an emergency incident or something because all these people were sitting next to each other on the beach and they're thousands.
But they can call an emergency as much as they bloody like.
There's thousands of people on the beach.
What are you going to do? Nothing you can do.
There's too many people that won't cooperate with you.
Now, how many shops are there in Britain?
How many police officers are there in Britain?
How many people go into those shops in Britain compared with how many police officers there are in Britain?
The difference in numbers is enormous.
The police officer I quoted earlier was absolutely right.
It's unenforceable. And what they're doing, they know it's unenforceable.
But what they're doing is saying, we're going to tell you it's mandatory.
And we know, because we've said that, you are going to acquiesce in vast numbers.
Not only that, a lot of you are going to attack those who refuse to acquiesce to this nonsense.
And you've probably seen it in Derby, Gaz.
I've seen it as I've been traveling through the country in the last 10 days or so.
But from the moment they announced that it was going to be mandatory from the 24th of July, people were starting to walk around shops in far greater numbers with masks on, even though it wasn't mandatory at that time.
And this is what they work on.
They know that these things are not enforceable if enough people say not having it.
But while people do, it becomes self-enforcing, which is what we're seeing in large numbers of people now with regard to these masks, as I say.
Because if people go into shops without masks in large numbers, And it's trying to be enforced by people calling the police.
Well, how are they going to do it?
There's not enough police officers.
And they're going to shops to tell someone to wear a face nappy and fine them for not doing so with all the crime that's going on.
It's insane.
And once again, as always, the power is in our hands.
And the reason that power is not used to bring an end to this nonsense and so much more, not just the virus nonsense, it's because people say, man in dark suit, here's my power.
You want me to do that?
Okay, sir. Yes, sir.
Thank you, sir. Until that ends, it's just going to get more extreme.
Yeah, I had a conversation earlier, actually, today.
He was saying, do you remember on March 23rd when we just needed to stay on our houses for three weeks to straighten the curve?
Do you remember that? That was just one step.
Yeah, and that's it. And it's gone on and on and on and on and on.
And like you say, the mask is just the next one.
And then, you know, it leads us up to the...
Come on.
It's just staying in for three weeks.
Oh, come on. It's just a mask.
Come on. It's just a vaccine.
Come on. It's just a chip.
Come on. Do you know what I mean? And that's what it is.
It's just one bit, one bit, one bit.
It's too long, mate. It is crazy.
I was talking to Jay, actually, earlier, and he was saying, a friend of his told him a story this morning that...
They've taken their son, who's a kid, into hospital with a broken nose.
So obviously, I don't know if anyone out there has ever broken their nose, but if you look at mine, I've taken a few batterings.
And you can't breathe because it's full of blood.
And so they made him wear a mask.
He's a kid. He's got a broken nose.
He can't breathe anyway. And you're making him wear a mask to go into hospital to get treatment for a broken nose.
You know what I mean? The medical profession is not exempt from idiocy.
And of course, how many times have we been approached over the last few months, Gaz, by people in the medical profession, and people that have gone to hospital for various things, who've said that once you get out of the public part of the hospital, not that there's many public been there, there's no mask wearing.
They're taking blood without masks and all that stuff in many hospitals.
It's all a contract, all of it.
Clapping the medical profession in Britain, clapping the National Health Service.
So as I've gone through Britain, over and over you see this rainbow symbol with the thank you NHS. And throughout this whole period, Hospitals have never been so empty.
They've never been so inactive.
And yet somehow the behavior insights team has managed to persuade vast numbers of British people and people around the world, America everywhere, that there are war zones.
That's the scale of psychological programming to which people allow themselves to be subjected to It is bizarre how you can look at a situation and say, right, we're in a global pandemic, which, you know, we need to stay in, we need to wear a mask, we need a vaccine, otherwise we're all going to die, while at the same time they're furloughing doctors because there's no patients.
So this is why there is such a war on people telling the truth.
That's why it is, because if all the facts are out and they're on the table, It's irrefutable.
The narrative is dying, and they're desperate to put a lid on it.
I personally think the horse is bolted, but they are desperate to do it.
I got sent a tweet yesterday by BitChute saying, basically, have you seen this?
It was a letter from Ofcom to them, wasn't it?
Yeah. Ofcom are a facilitator of fascism.
You know, stop beating about the bush.
We are at this time under the occupation of a fascistic government with fascistic agencies that impose the will of the fascistic government.
And the fascistic government is being driven in terms of its policy by deeply, deeply fascistic, psychopathic Extreme psychopaths who are operatives in this global cult that I have been exposing for 30 years.
And Ofcom is simply there, the Office of Communications.
It's a government agency that, quote, regulates the media.
The mainstream media is what it's been doing up to this point.
And the mainstream media, what happens is, When Ofcom speaks, the mainstream media gets down on its knees, puts its hand together, probably wears a mask, and asks forgiveness for putting the truth out.
It's this same Ofcom that banned the mainstream media in Britain from, in any way, having even a discussion Of linking current events to 5G. Ofcom are a disgraceful organisation run by a lady called Melanie Dawes, who's just a career civil servant, on behalf of the fascistic government.
And of course the cult-owned YouTube, Google and Facebook, etc.
have been censoring Alternative information about this pandemic and this hoax for months and months and months because if we go back to the manipulation of behavior behavior comes from perception and perception comes from information received so if you are going to control behavior you have to control perception and you do that by controlling information received and Therefore, you control the information you put out through the mainstream media.
But you've got another problem, and that is the alternative media that has got bigger and bigger and bigger as the years have passed, are putting out, in different ways, a story, an explanation that challenges the official narrative.
So as long as the alternative media is around, You cannot have complete control.
I mean, people like me would just watch the mainstream and get their information from it.
But those with a mind of their own have the opportunity to look at the alternative media and get another possibility of what's going on with a hell of a lot of supporting evidence, to say the least.
So if you keep having the alternative media, you can't have complete control of information so you can't have complete control of perception and thus behavior.
So we've had this systematic more and more extreme again the incremental one level and then the more extreme level more extreme level of these Silicon Valley Giants imposing more and more extreme levels of censorship on anyone who is challenging the World Health Organization version of events which means the Bill Gates' version of events, because he owns it, which means the cult version of events, because Gates is just an asset of the cult.
And we've reached the point now where more and more of the alternative media is being pushed into independent video platforms like BitChute.
And so they want to delete all access globally, To any information that's not the official story.
And so it was obvious.
We had this chat in months ago, Gaz, about the fact that they were eventually going to start targeting organizations like Bitshoot for regulation.
And what the British government, the fascistic Boris Johnson officially led, but not really, government, As given now Ofcom, it says, powers to start regulating independent video platforms on the internet for no other reason than to block another vehicle for challenges to the official story Getting out into the public arena.
And that's why I say that Ofcom is a fascist organization facilitating a deeply fascist government, facilitating a monumentally fascist cult that's driving all this.
So what is happening now with Ofcom and these letters, is it...
Well, it's not just predictable.
It was predicted that this was coming because it's incremental.
And they want to silence all opposition or questioning of the official narrative.
And that happened in Nazi Germany.
That happens in...
Fascists, communists, they're the same thing, really.
China. It happens in all tyrannies.
And now we're living a global tyranny in which what is happening in Britain is very much, because of the way this cult works, Britain is a massive center of it.
Not the government, the center of the web is in Europe.
America, yes, to an extent, but Europe for historical reasons.
Therefore, Britain is more extreme often than anyone else in the way that they're imposing upon the people and imposing censorship.
So this is no surprise whatsoever.
The one positive I see with it is, because you have to find positives, otherwise what's the point, is it's becoming so obvious now.
So for years and years, people have been pointing out various things, and it was kind of, yeah, that's happening over there or whatever, and yeah, is it?
Whereas now, it's just so obvious, you know, the fact that, okay, so, because what people's attitude was, and I saw a lot of it when our channel was deleted from YouTube, which was, well, they're a private company, so they should be able to have whoever they want on there.
So this isn't censorship.
You know, they have their guidelines and blah, blah, blah.
It was absolute nonsense, but that was...
Hashtag idiot, I take it.
Sorry, say that again. Hashtag idiots.
Well, yeah, exactly. But you saw a lot of that.
And that was people's attitude towards it.
It's like, you know, they're a private, limited company.
They can do what they want. All right, fine.
That's your attitude towards that.
So what then is your attitude towards this?
So is this not censorship then?
The fact that BitChute are a private company and they're more than happy to have people like ourselves and others, but now they're being told that they can't.
So I would go back to those people saying, but YouTube are a limited company and say, well, all right, what about this then?
And you just hope that because it's more obvious and it's so blatant and in your face that you'd literally have to be willingly blind to not acknowledge that we're in an absolute war.
Well, it is a war.
It's World War III. I honestly believe this is World War III. Yeah, it's a war on the people.
But, you see, what you're just describing there is a psychological phenomenon that I see all the time.
It's called denial.
See, if you start accepting the bloody obvious that we're in a fascistic situation with fascistic censorship, then you have to face the fact that you're living in a fascistic society.
Now, you don't want to face that.
You don't want to have to acknowledge that that's where we're at, which we are.
So what you do is, and you're not so much trying to convince other people, although you may think you are, you're trying to convince yourself.
You're trying to convince yourself that actually, oh no, this is not really fascism, this is not really censorship, it's just for your health, or it's just because they're a private company and they can do what they like.
But what you're trying to do Is convince yourself that you don't live in a fascistic society.
And therefore, people will cling to the wreckage of freedom until their knuckles turn white, claiming that the wreckage they're holding onto is just a boat, exactly as it was before.
It's not sunk.
It's not crashed. It's all right.
Because I don't want to face the fact That actually, I'm in trouble here, clinging to the wreckage of a boat in the middle of the ocean.
So I'll just crack on and convince myself, oh, the boat's just like it is.
And actually, I'm in the water because I fancy to swim.
This is all the denial, psychological processes that go on to try to convince yourself that What you are actually experiencing is not what you're experiencing.
Now, some of us believe the opposite.
Some of us believe that if you look something in the eye and say, I'm not having it, then you have a chance of rolling it back.
But while you completely stay in denial of it, why are you going to look in the eye and say enough of something you're denying actually exists?
And the other thing about these private companies is they were given immunity from lawsuits because they said they were just platforms for people to post on.
You know, your Facebooks and all these other people.
And so they were given immunity from being prosecuted for what is posted on their platforms.
Because they said, we're not publishers, we're just a platform.
But what they've done is taken that advantage and acted as if they are publishers by saying, oh no, you're not going to post that on our platform.
And this could be changed immediately by saying to them, look, If you're going to have this immunity, then you've got to stop censoring.
Because if you don't, you're acting like a publisher which should not have immunity.
And that could be done.
But it's not being done because the same cult that controls the politics owns Silicon Valley.
Yeah, and it's another platform for discourse.
So if I say I don't want to watch the news because I don't believe the mainstream media, then I'll go onto social media, but they control that as well.
So, you know, you have to control every side if you want to control the game, and that's exactly what's going on.
Just to wrap up, another thing that you've been writing in books and you've been producing videos talking about the whole sort of transhumanist agenda and all this stuff for years and years and years and years and how They were going to push humans basically into deprivation, which is exactly what they've done through this pandemic.
And for decades, talking about how basically AI and robots will be taken over.
And people have scoffed at it and laughed at it and gone, yeah, all right, mate, you've been watching too much of science fiction channels on Sky.
And then here we have...
The fact where humans are dangerous now, of course we're really dangerous because I can infect you with my horrible virus.
So we should probably just get a robot to do it.
And that's exactly what's happening.
And there's news stories left, right and centre in the mainstream media and no one's even going, oh hang on, didn't someone talk about this happening?
Where people are being served coffee by a robot.
Yeah, what happens is, and I've had this for 30 years, is you write something.
This is the plan. This is what's planned to happen.
And they ridicule you for it.
And then it happens.
But they don't acknowledge that you said ages before it was planned to happen.
And then you say something else.
This is planned to happen. And they ridicule you for it.
And then it happens.
And they don't acknowledge that either.
And so you get things like the Sky News story earlier.
Oh, this is a revelation.
Look at these figures.
Well, actually, people like me have been saying it for months.
So you get this.
And this area, and unless something, you know, More urgent comes up in the next week.
I want to do next week's video cast on what's happening in terms of this area you're talking about.
Not just in terms of robots, but in terms of synthetic humans and how that relates to the plummeting, horrifically plummeting sperm counts around the world because they're all connected and they will connect into the Gates vaccine as well because let no one kid themselves that vaccines are not used for sterilization and if you want to or you plan to have the entire population of the world as Gates has demanded be vaccinated with his toxic shite Then you've got them all, haven't you? So I think unless something urgent comes up, I think we should do something on that in next week's video cast because it's very, very important.
And this whole be frightened of humans, but don't be frightened of machines because they're nice, relates to both the climate cult hoax, where humans are dangerous and destroying the planet, And to the virus.
And here's an example, Gaz, from this week.
Robot food startups have a new pitch.
No humans touch your lunch.
Vertical agriculture company, Plenty Inc.
As an unusual selling point, its crops are grown in an indoor farm run by robots.
That hasn't always been a winning proposition.
Two years ago, the company had to scale back an ambitious international expansion plan, realizing it wasn't ready to bear the cost of pricey new markets, despite having taken more than $200 million in funding.
You don't get that kind of funding for a start-up.
Unless there are powerful forces that want to push the world where you're going.
I would love to know.
I would love to know a list of those funders.
I would love to know. Yeah, that would be interesting.
But now, with coronavirus-heightening food safety concerns, plenty has a fresh angle.
From planting through harvest, its vegetables don't encounter human hands, meaning fewer chances of virus contamination.
Oh, God, you're...
What people seem to be wanting is they want to know their food is safe, said Chief Executive Officer Matt Bernard.
Plenty, which is sanctioned by SoftBank Group Corps, is one of them, is for the person eating the food to be the first one to have touched it.