Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 8, 2020 - David Icke

34:30

Climate Change, Covid19 & The Fake Tests - David Icke

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	So, let's get started.
	I gather stories together during the week for this podcast and apart from that I don't
	really know where it's going to go in terms of the way the chat goes in terms of direction.
	But I think this week I am going to be concentrating on a few stories of real substance because there's been some very good articles this week posted on DavidOak.com.
	But I'm going to start with climate change because The force that's behind the climate hoax, human-caused climate hoax, is the force behind the pandemic hoax.
	And so we see the promoters of the climate hoax saying that we must use the opportunities, as they call them, presented by the virus hoax To impose the solutions to the climate hoax.
	And when you break down the human caused climate hoax story, you find that the same That is true of the virus hoax is true of the climate hoax.
	It's based on lies, manipulated data, and fixing the figures.
	Anyway, I'm going to start with this story, and then I'm going to go on to...
	The virus hoax, because more and more and more is coming out about that.
	So this is the headline.
	Forbes censors award-winning environmentalists apology over three decade quote climate scare.
	So Forbes censors it, but we won't.
	This is the story.
	Forbes has decided to unpublish an article by award-winning climate activist Michael Schellenberger in which he apologizes for the climate scare we created over the last 30 years.
	Schellenberger, a progressive, was named one of the Times Heroes of the Environment, while his book Breakthrough was heralded by Wired as potentially the best thing to happen to environmentalism since Rachel Carson's Silent Spring.
	His book...
	Apocalypse Never was widely praised as an eye-opening, fact-based approach to climate science and engaging and well-researched.
	Now that he's apologised for three decades of climate alarmism, Forbes has now blocked Schellenberger's article without explanation.
	But it doesn't need to give an explanation because the explanation is obvious.
	When you are challenging the official narrative of anything you get censored and sidelined and if you are someone who has been on the other side promoting the narrative and now says actually it's a load of garbage which some of us have been saying for decades then you are even More targeted for silencing because you're a danger.
	Because you've been one of them.
	You've been one of us.
	And now, ah, you're a turncoat.
	You're a traitor. And, most importantly, because you have been promoting the narrative and now you're going against it, That's very powerful in the public mind.
	So, shut them up.
	So these are some of the things that Schellenberger has said in the article unpublished by Forbes, which of course is a journal of the 1%.
	On behalf of environmentalists, I apologize for the climate scare.
	On behalf of environmentalists everywhere, I would like to formally apologize for the climate scare we created over the last 30 years.
	Climate change is happening.
	It's just not the end of the world.
	It's not even our most serious environmental problem.
	I may seem like a strange person to be saying all this.
	I've been a climate activist for 20 years and an environmentalist for 30.
	But as an energy expert asked by Congress to provide objective expert testimony and invited by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, to serve as expert reviewer of its next assessment report, I feel an obligation to apologize for how badly we environmentalists have misled the public.
	Here are some facts that people...
	No. Humans are not causing a sixth mass extinction.
	The Amazon is not the lungs of the world.
	Climate change is not making natural disasters worse.
	Fires have declined 25% around the world since 2003.
	The amount of land we use for meat, humankind's biggest use of land, has declined by an area nearly as large as Alaska.
	The buildup of wood fuel and more houses near forests, not climate change, explain why there are more and dangerous fires in Australia and California.
	Carbon emissions are declining in most rich countries and have been declining in Britain, Germany and France since the mid-1970s.
	Adapting to life below sea level made the Netherlands rich, not poor.
	We produce 25% more food than we need and food surpluses will continue to rise as the world gets hotter.
	But watch the coronavirus scam impact on that.
	Habitat loss and direct killing of wild animals are bigger threats to species than climate change.
	Wood fuel is far worse for people and wildlife than fossil fuels.
	Preventing future pandemics requires more, not less industrial agriculture.
	I know that the above facts will sound like climate denialism to many people, but that just shows the power of climate alarmism.
	Now, I've quoted over the years a number of people, including scientists and climate scientists, who were on the gravy train of human-caused climate change, end of the world!
	Who've actually seen through the crap and realised it's a scam.
	And, you know, when people say...
	Well, no, they wouldn't scam the coronavirus pandemic to the extent that you're saying, i.e.
	there is no virus.
	I'm going to come to that. Well, while some of us have been saying that the human-caused climate change narrative Is simply systematic mendacity to create the illusion of a problem to which you can offer a solution, which is a Marxist world of centralized dictatorship to save the planet.
	People have said, well, they wouldn't play a scam that big.
	And why would they?
	Well, I've just explained why would they.
	But they wouldn't. They wouldn't create a global perception of a climate emergency that doesn't exist.
	Well, here's one of the insiders of that over 20 years and 30 years who is saying that's exactly what they've done.
	And this human-caused climate change scam and the pandemic hoax are the same force expressing itself in different ways.
	They are indivisible from each other and when you look at the solutions that are being Put forward for both.
	They have, of course, many cross-references of what they demand to save the planet and to save the world from the virus, which doesn't exist.
	I'm going to come to that now because I had a very pleasant chat this week.
	With Dr.
	Andrew Kaufman, who is an American medical doctor and has so much experience in so many different areas related to medicine, even computer modeling in the medical profession, medical arena. And that's another point, actually.
	Slip of the tongue brings up a very important point.
	The climate modelers who have told us that this is what's going to happen to the world if we don't do A, B and C. In other words, do what the 1% wants.
	Many of them are the same computer modelers who have said this is what's going to happen in terms of mass deaths.
	If we don't do A, B, and C, i.e.
	lockdown, etc., social distancing, transformation of human society, which is what the 1% want.
	The climate models and the virus models, for instance, have both come out of Imperial College in London, where Professor Lockdown, Professor Neil Ferguson, whose ludicrous computer models led to the lockdown, where he works.
	And I was chatting to Andrew Kaufman, who has done an absolutely brilliant job in the last few months, and he has this calm forensic approach based on facts.
	That is very compelling.
	And I've not yet seen him ask the question that he did not credibly, factually answer.
	And so we're having a chat about the fact.
	Well, just go back one step.
	He, I, and some other people, but not many, comparatively, have been saying from almost the start of this that there is no COVID-19, that there is no SARS-2.
	It doesn't exist.
	It never has. And again, we come back to this theme The bigger the lie, the more we'll believe it.
	Or put another way, the bigger the lie, the more people will not be able to accept that anyone would lie that big.
	Well, they would.
	And they are. And so the reason I was chatting to him Is because every time I post something that says there is no virus, or the virus has never been shown to exist, you get people sending links that say, oh yes, they have this.
	I think we've had it from Australia, we've had it from Canada, all over the place.
	Scotland. Yes, they have isolated the virus and showed it exists.
	Well, they haven't.
	None of them turn out to have done because of the way they, the methodology they use, which they call showing the virus exists when they've done nothing of the kind.
	And the other interesting thing is given how long now, months and months, that Andrew Kaufman and myself have been saying there is no virus and it's not been isolated or purified to show it exists or that it causes an infectious disease.
	I'm going to come to that virus isn't infectious disease in a second.
	And given the time scale now, why haven't the government, any government come out and said, look, this is rubbish, right?
	Here's the evidence.
	Here's the papers that the virus has been isolated and purified and shown to exist.
	And here's the sequence where we showed that the virus causes this disease called COVID-19.
	Well, it's never come.
	It's just links that people send you.
	Oh, look, this has happened. But it hasn't.
	It hasn't.
	And I have people say, well, you know, I support what you're doing, but shouldn't you now kind of step back or pull back from saying that there is no virus?
	Because, look, they have isolated it.
	They haven't. They haven't!
	And during the chat with Andrew, he said, I'm going to send you an article.
	It's a long article, very detailed article, by a man called Dr.
	Stefan Lanker. And Dr.
	Lanka became well known for a court case over his claim with tremendous supporting evidence that there is no such thing as a measles virus.
	So what I'm going to do is just go through a bit of this article.
	You can read the whole thing on davidike.com.
	But it's called the misconception called virus.
	It's a staggering thing to say, but true, that despite all this stuff about the coronavirus, etc., Oh, virus this, virus that, virus the bloody other.
	There is no proven scientific evidence that a, quote, virus of any kind causes disease.
	What? Yeah.
	No proven evidence.
	I've got a book next to me here.
	It's called, let me get it out here.
	A very thick book, a very detailed book called What Really Makes You Ill?
	Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong.
	And it's by two authors, Dawn Lester and David Parker.
	And there's a section in it about viruses, which is...
	Which is staggering when you look at the claims that are made for viruses.
	I'll just read you this one paragraph I've found now.
	The definition, this is the definition of what a virus is, also claims that viruses are the causes of many diseases as if this has been definitively proven.
	But this is not the case.
	There is no original scientific evidence that definitively demonstrates that any virus is the cause of any disease.
	The burden of proof for any theory lies with those who propose it, but none of the existing documents provides proof that supports the claim that viruses are pathogens.
	Now, that is precisely what Dr.
	Lanka says in this article.
	Here we go.
	Contrary to what most people believe, there are no pathogenic viruses.
	The claim about the existence of viruses and viral diseases are based on historical misinterpretations and not, as I thought in the past, on fraud or deliberate deception.
	Well, I think there has been some fraud or deliberate deception myself, but the vast majority of doctors, which is the point that Lank is making, are not doing it On the basis of fraud and deception, they're doing it because they actually have been taught to believe that it's true.
	But if you go deep in the shadows, you'll find that that's happened to them for a reason.
	We now have new, better, in the positive meaning, scientific discoveries, Lanka says, And explanations for the origin therapy and prevention, not just of viral diseases.
	The phenomenon of simultaneous or subsequent appearance of symptoms in different persons which has until now been interpreted as contagion and was believed to be caused by the transmission of pathogens is now also easy to understand through new discoveries.
	Thus we now have a new view of life which in reality is an old view That was just superseded by what we now believe and of the cosmological integration of biological processes.
	And that's an interesting point because when I was growing up, you know, when I was growing up in the 50s, I never heard the word virus.
	You know, you go to the doctor today and you've got symptoms.
	They say, well, I think you've got a virus.
	Virus is the cause of every bloody thing.
	When I was a kid, the word, which actually is Latin for poison, which I go into in the new book, The Answer, into why it was legitimately a word that came from the word meaning poison.
	The word virus was never talked about.
	You didn't go to the doctor and say, I think you got a virus.
	You just never heard it.
	Now it's everywhere.
	And Lanca takes it apart.
	And he goes in to how they test for the existence of a virus.
	With a test that in no way shows that there's a virus, which is exactly what Andrew Kaufman has been pointing out.
	In a section of this article called The Current Situation...
	Lanker says this.
	All claims about viruses as pathogens are wrong and are based on easily recognizable, understandable and verifiable misinterpretations.
	The real causes of diseases and phenomena which are ascribed to viruses have already been discovered and researched.
	This knowledge is now available.
	All scientists who think they are working with viruses in laboratories are actually working with typical particles of specific dying tissues or cells which were prepared in a special way.
	They believe that those tissues and cells are dying because they were infected by a virus.
	In reality, those prepared tissues and cells are dying because they were starved and poisoned as a consequence of the experiments in the lab.
	And you can read this article on davidike.com in full, but what he's saying, and this is what Kaufman's saying as well, is that What they are attributing to a virus in a cell culture, for instance, in a laboratory, and its effect on cells, is actually not the effect of a virus.
	It's the effect of the way they're carrying out the test and doing the experiment.
	He says virologists believe in viruses because they add to the tissue and cell culture allegedly infected blood, saliva or other body fluids after having withdrawn the nutrients from the respective cell culture and after having started poisoning it with toxic antibiotics.
	They believe that the cell culture is then killed by viruses.
	However, the death of the tissue and cells takes place in the exact same manner when no, quote, infected genetic material is added at all.
	So you're claiming that this effect on the cells in the culture is caused by a virus, but when you...
	That you have in the genetic material.
	But when you have genetic material that is healthy, exactly the same things happen to the cells.
	Thus, it can't be caused by what you claim it is, which is a virus.
	And this is fundamentally part and a foundation, whole foundation, of the scam over COVID-19.
	The virologists have apparently not noticed this fact, he says.
	According to the scientific logic and the rules of scientific conduct, control experiments should have been carried out in order to confirm the newly discovered method of so-called virus propagation.
	In order to see whether it was not the method itself causing or falsifying the result, the scientists would have had to perform additional experiments called negative control experiments in which they would add sterile substances or substances from healthy people and animals in the cell culture.
	These control experiments have never been carried out by official science to this day.
	During the measles virus trial that he was involved in, he said, I commissioned an independent laboratory to perform this control experiment and the result was that the tissues and cells die due to the laboratory conditions in the exact same way as when they come into contact with allegedly infected material.
	The purpose of control experiments is to exclude the possibility that it is the applied method or technique which may cause the result.
	Control experiments are the highest duty in science and also the exclusive basis of claiming that one's conclusion is scientific.
	During the measles virus trial, it was the legally appointed expert who stated that the papers which are crucial for the entire virology contain no control experiments.
	We learn from this that the respective scientists work extremely unscientifically without noticing it.
	This completely unscientific approach originated in June 1954 he says.
	When an unscientific and refutable speculative article was published, according to which the death of tissue in a test tube was considered a possible evidence for the presence of a virus.
	Six months later, on 10 December 1954, the main author of this opinion was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine for another equally speculative theory.
	The speculation from June 1954 was then raised to a scientific fact and became a dogma which has never been challenged to this date.
	Since June 1954, the death of tissue and cells in a chest tube has been regarded as proof for the existence of a virus.
	Is what they are doing and then claiming they have proved the virus exists.
	There is no SARS-2.
	There is no COVID-19.
	It's been done by a fake test, which I've got to come to shortly.
	And by redesignating people who have died of other causes to have died from COVID-19.
	I do recommend reading that article by Dr.
	Stefan Lanker. It's absolutely brilliant.
	So, let's come on to this PCR test.
	Fraud. And you will notice that through the summer now, as they say, oh, look, more and more cases of coronavirus.
	They're shutting down my home city of Leicester in England because the case numbers have gone up.
	You will notice they're not talking about deaths anymore.
	They're talking about the cases going up and they're justifying their fascistic tyrannies on the basis of the number of cases going up.
	But they're testing more and more people.
	And so more and more people are going to test positive, not for COVID-19 because the test is not testing for COVID-19, but for other genetic material with lots of people having their bodies.
	And the offguardian.org website has done some tremendous work through this whole scam, looking at the figures and how they're being manipulated.
	And as this When the process of months has unfolded, it's very clear that those behind offguardian.org have become more and more convinced of the fact that a scam is going on.
	And this is an article from this week which has been posted on davidlike.com.
	It's very good. Headline, COVID-19 PCR tests are scientifically meaningless.
	Something I've been saying since, well, way back.
	And this is also part of the whole presentation by Andrew Kaufman and others.
	I was sent a detailed explanation From a medical scientist in America who's working in the US healthcare system, explaining how the PCR test was meaningless and was not testing for COVID-19.
	I mean, way back, even before the lockdown was kicked in, in Britain.
	Anyway, and it turned out to be absolutely right.
	Not just on that, but many other things he said would happen.
	Like the use of computer models to frighten people into Doing what the government said and giving the excuse to governments to do what has happened, lockdowns and destroying the world economy.
	So COVID-19 PCR tests are scientifically meaningless.
	And I should add that Kerry Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR test, In the 1980s actually said that the test should not be used to diagnose infectious disease, which is exactly what the test he invented is being used for, because it's a scam.
	So the sub-headline of this article is, though the whole world relies on the RT-PCR to diagnose, quote, SARS-CoV-2 infection, the science is clear they are not fit for purpose.
	Lockdowns and hygienic measures around the world are based on numbers of cases and mortality rates created by the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests used to identify, quote, positive patients, whereby positive is usually equated with infected patients.

▲