All Episodes
Previous Next
July 3, 2020 - David Icke
01:15:22
'Covid' Movie Latest - 'Deaths' Become 'Cases' On The Road Back To Lockdown - Dot-Connector Video
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So, let's get started. So, this is the first time I've ever played this game. I'm going to show you a little bit of the
game. So, let's get started.
♪♪♪♪ Hello ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the David Icke Dock
Connected video cast.
It's Friday, which means tomorrow, the 4th of July, Independence Day.
The pubs are opening.
Woo-hoo! We're allowed to go for a beer.
The plebs are allowed to go to the boozer.
But for how long?
Dad, how are you, mate? You okay?
I'm good, mate. And I'm watching the latest stage of the global scam unfold before me eyes.
And that is the...
The move from trying to frighten us by the number of, quote, COVID deaths, with trying to frighten us with the number of COVID cases.
And the obvious switch from one to the other, as we are here in the northern hemisphere in the middle of summer, is blatantly obvious.
Because what happens, for instance, in the summer is the number of respiratory deaths goes down.
I've got a report here by the British Lung Foundation.
In 2016-2017, respiratory admissions peaked in December at 32,492, far above the average of 10,652 for the 20 most common disease areas.
Of course, In worldwide terms, respiratory disease is the third biggest cause of death for human beings.
And it goes on, there are 80% more lung disease admissions in the winter months of December, January, and February than there are in the warmer spring months of March, April, May, and of course into the summer.
As I've been saying now for months, and the evidence just grows and grows and grows.
There is no COVID-19 or SARS-2, as they call the, quote, virus.
It doesn't exist.
They've never isolated and purified it to show it exists.
They've never shown that it causes an infectious disease.
None of this has ever been done.
And whenever I post this...
Thank you.
Genuine people a lot of them say oh, yes, it has been isolated. Yeah, and it has been
Purified But well most of them just say isolated because it says so
in this paper But when you then look at their methodology, they've not
isolated the virus at all They've they've put what they say contains the virus
in a tissue culture with lots of other guns including antibiotics
Thanks.
And they want us to believe that's a virus which they've never shown to exist.
And we've had a tremendous article this week on DavidLight.com by Dr.
Stefan Lanker, a German doctor who's been looking at the evidence that any virus causes A disease.
And he's found the evidence to be zero.
And he explains why.
And he also explains how they do this test, which they often fraudulently call an isolation of the virus.
Nothing of the kind. And we've had from Canada, we've had from Australia, we've had from lots of parts of the world.
You know, genuine people saying, look, you know, it has been isolated.
Look at this paper. But when you break it down, it hasn't at all.
Because of the methodology they use.
So where I'm going with this in terms of deaths and cases is how have they produced the figures when there is no virus?
They've done it in three ways.
First of all, by diagnosing on symptoms which are flu-like.
Oh, flu-like symptoms!
What could be causing that?
Well, maybe it's the flu. Maybe it's a cold.
Maybe it's a long stream of things that cause flu-like symptoms.
But now, it's COVID-19.
And every time someone is diagnosed from symptoms as SARS-2, COVID-19, it goes on the case numbers.
And if they die, it goes on the death numbers.
The other way they've been diagnosing is with this test.
And I have to laugh because it's so insanely ludicrous as I'm going to come to.
The PCR test, RT-PCR test, is not testing for COVID-19.
It's not testing for SARS-CoV-2.
How can it, when it doesn't exist for a start, And how can it if it's not been isolated so that you've got the virus and only the virus that you claim to exist?
You can't test for that.
And this PCR test was created by a guy called Kerry Mullis in the 1980s.
He won the Nobel Prize for it.
And the creator of it says, this test should not be used to diagnose infectious disease.
And that's exactly what they're using it for.
It's testing for a dog's breakfast of RNA material, which they're claiming is the virus and it isn't.
All provable fact, by the way.
And so, lots and lots of people have this genetic material in their body of various types and expressions.
It's not doing them any harm, overwhelmingly.
The immune system is keeping it under control.
And that's why the vast overwhelming majority of people who test positive with this PCR test for the virus, which is not testing for the virus, have no symptoms.
Why? There's nothing wrong with them.
Because they haven't got a very bloody virus.
That doesn't exist.
And part of that scam is to say, oh yeah, but people without symptoms, they can pass it on to other people.
Just part of the scam, just part of the propaganda, part of the PSYOP. So, the more you test, the more positives you're going to get of this genetic material, not COVID-19.
And thus, your case numbers are going to go up.
And in the summer months here, as the respiratory disease goes down, overwhelmingly in old people suffering from respiratory disease, of course, you've got fewer and fewer opportunities to designate people dying of something else, which is what you've been doing this far, to have died from COVID-19.
Just the number of respiratory diseases going down.
So what you do is you move it from deaths and you go on to cases.
Now it's all cases. Look at it.
Not deaths. Deaths, ooh, way down.
Even the designated deaths.
Cases, ooh, way up.
But the more you test, the more cases you're going to get.
And when you get more cases from a test not testing for the virus, you say, oh, in Leicester, Isle of Wight, wherever, the cases have gone up.
It's doing the same in America. So, oh, we have to open the lockdowns, all these cases.
How many people are ill? Oh, right!
So we'll just go on destroying the economy and people's lives.
And, you know, I've been saying all this.
People like Dr.
Andrew Kaufman, the American doctor, has been saying this for months and months and months.
And I know that even in the alternative media, There's a resistance to the virus doesn't exist.
I hear things like, oh, the virus doesn't exist, but it's just being exploited.
No, it's not. It's being exploited, but it's being exploited from a point of view that doesn't exist, and it's just a manifestation of propaganda, constant repetition, and manipulated figures.
So when you have COVID-19 going on death certificates for everything, virtually, You have a doctor in the British National Health Service saying that he knows that other doctors have been putting COVID-19 on the death certificate for all causes since early March.
No, there's a scam.
All these people have died of COVID-19.
No, they haven't.
They've died of other things which the system has designated COVID-19.
It's a scam. There's a...
A video on the website this week, which includes a recorded conversation between a member of the public and the coroner's office, where the man is asking for a diagnosis, a death diagnosis from the coroner's office.
And the lady on the other end, she seemed a very nice woman, just caught in the system.
She says, well, there was a test taken, presumably from the dead person, for COVID-19, and we've not had it back yet.
And as the conversation unfolds, it turns out, she says quite openly, you can hear it, if the test comes back positive for COVID-19, then we'll put COVID-19 on the death certificate.
And if it doesn't, then there'll be...
It will go further and there'll be a post-mortem to see what actually the cause was.
But there won't be a post-mortem to see if it was COVID-19 as long as they test positive with a test that's not testing for COVID-19.
And there was this article on the website this week from the Off Guardian website.
It's done some great stuff on the figures in this period.
And The headline says it already.
COVID-19 PCR tests are scientifically meaningless, which is what some of us have been saying for months.
And what they did in this article is they went to people who run studies and tried to prove that there is a virus.
And where it has been claimed in Some of the cases that, yes, we have isolated the virus to show it exists.
Well, they haven't. Because isolation means purification.
It means you only have the viral material you claim to exist and no other contaminating genetic material.
So what they did is they went to these studies and And I asked him this question.
Do your electron micrographs show the purified virus?
In other words, have you shown it to exist?
And these were the replies from four of them, but there were others.
Answer one. The image is the virus budding from an infected cell.
It is not purified virus.
And by the way, you see all these pictures of COVID-19?
There it is, look.
They're all computer-generated images.
Ooh, there's COVID-19.
Look, proved it. Another response from another study.
We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.
The other ones... They don't show it exists.
They just tell us it does.
Number three, we need not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.
And four, we show an image of sedimented virus particles not purified ones.
And as the article goes on, Regardless, the mentioned papers, it is clear that what is shown in the electron micrographs, EMs, is the end result of the experiment, meaning there is no other result that they could have made EMs from.
That is to say, if the orders of these studies or authors of these studies concede that their published EMs do not show purified particles, Then they definitely do not possess purified particles claimed to be viral.
In this context it has to be remarked that some researchers use the term isolation in the papers.
This is what catches a lot of people out when they say look they have been isolated.
But the procedures described therein do not represent proper isolation purification of the process.
Consequently in this context the term isolation is misused.
Thus, the authors of four of the principal early 2020 papers claiming discovery of a new coronavirus concede they had no proof that the origin of the virus genome was viral like particles or cellular debris, pure or impure, Or particles of any kind.
In other words, the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.
And if you go into the shadows, it's based on lies, not truth.
And the article continues.
Just read this short bit.
We have also contacted Dr.
Charles Kalischer, who is a seasoned virologist.
In 2001, Science published an impassioned plea to the younger generation from several veteran biologists, among them Kalischer, saying that modern virus detection methods, like the PCR test, tell little or nothing about how a virus multiplies, which animals carry it, or how it makes people sick.
This virus you say is making people sick, how does it do it?
That's where we are.
It is like trying to say whether someone has bad breath by looking at his fingerprint.
That's the PCR test that's locking down Leicester and other places likely because of the number of cases that have tested positive with a test not testing for what it says it's testing for.
And that's why we asked Dr.
Kalischer whether he knows one single paper in which SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and finally really purified and shown to be real.
His answer? I know of no such publication.
I have kept an eye out for one, as have a lot of other people who've also never found one.
Off Guardian's been excellent.
I think they've been excellent for a while, though, to be fair.
But they've been particularly good throughout this whole pandemic.
See, I try and look at it a little bit in terms of give the benefit of the doubt to people.
Go, okay, so say it exists.
Say it exists. Right. What about this death rate?
What about this? What about that? And I try and reason with people on that level.
Go, okay, so I say it doesn't exist.
I don't believe it exists. You do.
Okay, so let's go with your attitude.
So it does exist. Then look at these stats, you know, like the 0.26% death rate and stuff like that.
So I'd look at the whole Leicester lockdown and the increased cases from their point of view.
So, okay, it's real. It exists.
All right, fine. If you've increased testing and...
You're genuinely testing for it, say, and you find more cases and all these people are healthy.
That's a good thing, isn't it?
Surely that's a good thing because what you're doing is you're going, right, we've got more and more cases, which means more people have got it, which means more people have been exposed to it, but they're not ill.
So therefore the mortality percentage, the death rate is even lower than we thought it was.
So actually, well, this is amazing.
This is a good thing, surely.
And the fact that they're reacting in the way that they are, that, oh my God, this is dreadful.
Is another example, if we need another example, that it's just a load of bollocks, really?
That's how I look at it anyway.
Yeah, you're absolutely right.
And the programming is extraordinary.
And the lack of ability to process information and see through the lies is equally extraordinary.
I saw some quotes yesterday from members of the public in Leicester.
Who were calling for the army to be put on the streets to stop people breaking these continuing lockdown rules.
I mean, it's just mind-blowing the scale to which people have been psychologically scammed.
And you're right. See, this is...
I mean, this...
This video cast every week is called Dot Connector.
And if you don't connect the dots, then you're never going to see the picture.
So, on one hand, you have a death rate which has gone down and down and down and down and down throughout all of this.
It started out 3.4% with the Ludicrous Gates-owned World Health Organization and the corrupt Director General, Ted Ross.
But now it's come down in official estimates to around 0.26% for infection to death rate.
And if you're under 70, it's estimated to be 0.004%.
So through the winter and the end of winter, when lots of people, particularly old people, for reasons we talked about, not COVID-19, have been dying and been designated COVID-19 to push the figures up, the death rate figures, that focus has been on death rates.
But as we've now come out of that period, where they can do that on the same scale, They've moved to cases.
And so, as you rightly say, the more they test, the more people test positive, not for COVID-19, but in their propaganda for COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, and have no symptoms, then that means the death rates of Alleged infection, test positive, to fatality gets smaller and smaller and smaller and smaller.
Of course it does, but in the public mind, they want to keep those two things apart so people don't see, hold on a minute, the more people that test positive and have no symptoms...
They'll lower the death rate. So why are we terrified of this thing?
We're terrified of it because we don't be terrified of it.
And what's happening, guys, is this is a holding position.
Because the idea is to, once the winter months start again, and people get colds and flu and pneumonia, etc., Then hysteria is going to unfold as everything that moves is going to be COVID-19 and they're going to say it's come back with even greater power, which wouldn't be difficult.
But they don't want a period in between...
When people forget about lockdown, forget about social distancing, forget about all the things that we're told we have to conform to now, they don't want that just to go away.
So because they can't designate death rates in the same way that they did in the winter, early spring months, they've gone for cases to keep the thing bubbling.
And to keep the fear bubbling.
And to keep the ability to impose their will on the public bubbling.
So it's just a holding position until they hit the winter months and all the flu and colds, etc., which they are going to say COVID-19 everywhere.
As I've said before, fascism is nothing if not predictable.
And these psychopaths behind this are nothing if not predictable.
You know that one year, of course, they're going to designate every single runny nose when we get to sort of winter months.
But at the same time, I can see this being a horrific winter season.
For flus and respiratory problems anyway, because you've had everyone locked in their houses for months.
No one's out, you know, exposed to germs.
No one's getting as they should be.
You know, no one's having a healthy life.
No one's allowed to go to the gym.
No one's allowed to exercise. No one's allowed to do all this stuff.
So you're stuck in your house. People are drinking too much.
They're eating crap. They're being muzzled with these masks now everywhere.
So you're breathing in your own shite the whole time.
And then all of a sudden, obviously, the winter months, you're going to be exposed to these things.
And I imagine that it's going to be a hell of a lot worse because you're starting off from a worse position health-wise.
The PSYOP with the masks is bizarre, Dad, honestly, mate.
It's getting worse and worse, and it's more and more obvious.
So just over the last couple of days, I saw the governor of California, who is a complete toss-pot anyway, for various reasons, tweeting how...
How wearing a mask wasn't a sign of weakness.
It was a sign of strength and masculinity.
Well, that's Orwell, isn't it? Yeah.
Yeah. That's Orwell conversion.
Exactly. So he's saying that.
The other thing I saw yesterday, I got tagged in it.
So for years now, people have been asking Twitter for an edit button.
So you can, like with Facebook, if I write a status and then I post it and I go, oh shit, I've spelled that wrong.
I can go in and just, you know, change the spelling of it or whatever.
On Twitter, you can't do that.
So it's frustrating. Like, sometimes you'll post something.
You might realise, oh, idiot.
Delete it, post it again, that's fine.
But sometimes you don't realise that you've done a typo for an hour and it's got however many retweets and replies and you think, oh my God, like, I've spelt this wrong.
What an idiot. So people have been saying, can we have an edit button?
So they tweeted yesterday saying, you can have an edit button when everyone wears a mask.
You know, and it's just like, we'll give you what you want when you conform.
Yeah, well, it's all coming from the central point.
That's why.
The masks are just social engineering and psychological engineering, nothing to do with health.
We've covered that many times before.
People just need to look at facts and research facts and not just repeat what they hear from the mainstream.
The mainstream everything, whether it's the mainstream media, the mainstream of Silicon Valley, the mainstream of government, the mainstream of science, the mainstream of everything, it's all ultimately controlled in its narrative.
By the same force.
So if it's coming from the mainstream, whatever it is, it needs to be seriously questioned and not accepted on face value.
Because one thing you know about the mainstream everything is it bloody lies to you.
And people say that, oh yeah, you can't believe what the authorities say.
And then they go and do it.
You know, it's extraordinary.
And when you do break it down, we've got a virus that doesn't exist, that only exists in theory in the minds of the population.
I saw a clip a few days ago now of Bill and Melinda Gates, like Mr.
and Mrs. Satan, sat there being interviewed.
And it's extraordinary. I don't know if you've seen it, Dad, but at the end, She does all the talking, basically, and he just sits there looking like Kermit the Frog.
And then, you know, she says, obviously, it's going to come back.
Second wave, you know, worst kept secret in the world.
Of course it's going to come back, mate. We know it is because you're planning it too.
And then he basically says, he then pipes up, sounding like Kermit the Frog, saying that how basically when the second one hits...
It's going to be massive, basically, and then they'll pay attention.
And she giggles, which is weird, because if it's genuine, and you believe it's genuine, and a second wave's going to come and kill a shitload of people, you're giggling about it.
That's pretty psychopathic.
But the way he said it, Dad, honestly, it was like, say I'm a serial killer and I'm killing a load of people and I'm not really getting the attention that I want.
So I'm going to go and kill the daughter of the chief of police.
Then they'll notice me.
Then they'll pay. It was honestly just the way it was said and her reaction to it, it was psychopathic.
And I wasn't the only one that saw it like that either.
There was a lot of people going, is this normal?
It's very, very odd.
Well, there's a reason for that, and that is that Bill Gates is a psychopath, and an extreme one, as I've been saying for a long time.
And he does often laugh in the wrong places, the wrong places from a humane point of view.
But it's important to listen to what Gates says, because he's telling you what's coming.
He must get a bit of a kick out of it, a bit of a laugh.
So in 2015, he says this pandemic's coming in a TED Talk.
Then there's the event 201, six weeks before this came to public attention, in which he's, with others, operating a simulation of a global pandemic of a, quote, And he's said that pandemic 2, as he calls it, could be a bioweapon.
And he's saying here this week that in October, November, that basically COVID-19 is going to explode.
Well, some of us have been saying that for months because it's the plan.
So what Gates is telling you in his prophecies is actually what's planned to happen.
So that's important to listen to what he says from that point of view.
No other point of view.
And this is what the plan is.
And the idea is that because in the last couple of days or so, Boris Johnson, British Prime Minister, has said that the furlough payments to people who've been affected by the lockdown, their jobs have not been there to be done, that it will only go to October and then it will stop.
Now, again, some of us have been saying this for months, that that was the plan.
Because what Johnson and the government, well, Johnson is a front man, but he's not driving the policy, he's a spectator.
But what they've been doing with these furlough payments, once they hit the lockdown at the start, is to literally, literally buy time.
Imagine if when they locked down Britain and other countries, and they said all the jobs have got to stop, this has got to close, everything's got to stop apart from essential things, which included putting 5G masks up, of course. Then if there were no payments, then the lockdown wouldn't have lasted this long.
Because they would have kicked off.
People would have kicked off. Why?
They were running out of money.
So they bought them.
And you know people who said, oh, this is great.
There's lockdown. I'm getting so much percentage of my wage and I'm not having to work.
This is great. Well, let's have a conversation in October, shall we?
And you see if you think it's great then.
Because the idea is you buy them.
You buy the time.
You have far less resistance to it because of the furlough payments, but many people have not got them, businesses and stuff like that.
But the idea is to stop them in October.
Now, what else is planned to happen in October?
The re-emergence of COVID-19.
It's going to be brutal.
And it's meant to be. That's the plan.
That's what it's all about.
And that's why people need to stop looking around in bewilderment and realize what's going on and starting to cease to cooperate with it.
Because if you don't, this is what's coming, including food shortages, which are in the process of being manipulated and manufactured now as we speak.
That's happening all over, particularly Germany.
Germany's been pretty hard hit by it, where the virus has emerged in food production factories and stuff.
The same in Wales. There's quite a few in Wales now.
It doesn't worry about.
Yeah, of course. Like, everything's a coincidence.
Like you said, we said at the beginning, the whole furlough thing was a complete scam.
Of course it was. Like you say, if you were going to say to people, you've got to stay in your house, well, people immediately can't eat because they're not earning any money, and they're going to resist because they have to resist.
They've sort of got everyone now into a point of acquiescence where they just sat back watching Netflix getting paid.
And I was saying the whole time, as you were saying, I was getting ear-roll grief on social media.
Obviously, that's what social media is about.
Saying, like, guys, this is like...
This is really short-sighted, like your attitude of, you know, I'm getting my money, I don't have to pay to go to work, I don't have to buy my lunch at the cafe at work, so I'm actually making more money.
It's really short-sighted, guys, you know, and that's what's happening.
And so these businesses have gone under.
So when that furlough, even if you didn't have the big explosion of COVID in October, which we know is coming, if not sooner, to be fair, you know, Even if you didn't have that, you're not going to have a job to go back to anyway.
Because the company you work for has gone under.
And like I say, the amount of ear oil grief you got from saying to people, look, you know, it's a scam.
It's a total scam. But a lot of people are waking up to it now.
And the problem is, as we've spoken about for years, things are always going to have to become...
It's so horrific that you can't ignore it.
And that's depressing because you're trying to point stuff out to people, well, you, for years.
And, you know, it's like you're saying to people, don't go in there.
Don't go in there because you're going to get punched in the face.
And people are just ignoring you, ignoring you, ignoring you.
And gradually they're walking out now with bloody noses and you're stood there going, well, do you know what I mean?
I told you. I'm not taking any pleasure in it, but I told you.
Yeah, but this is what happens when you react to events instead of seeing them coming.
And you can see them coming if you don't only watch the mainstream media.
Another thing that's happened this week, or been highlighted this week, is the effect on everyone, but particularly children, of this social distancing.
Because what is it?
It is a form of isolation.
And one of the biggest...
Methods of mind control and perceptual manipulation used by organizations like the CIA and the military and so on is isolation, isolating people so they don't have contact.
And, you know, the way you see children interact before all this and the way you see them interact now, it is absolutely a form of isolation.
It's described very well in an article this week, which is from Health Impact News.
And the headline sums it up.
Children have 0.00% chance of dying from COVID, but are harmed for life by social distancing.
And every parent should...
I'm just going to pick out a section.
It's a long article that's headed how social isolation affects the brain.
And this, of course, doesn't just affect children, but adults as well.
But children are particularly affected.
So it goes on.
Not only does social distancing and social isolation, as visually proven by way of MRI scans, shut off the very part of the brain children need in order to learn while at school.
Another study shows that social isolation causes the buildup of a particular chemical in the brain.
While the study was conducted on mice, humans have the same brain signaling structure, basically.
The buildup of the protein in the brains of mice exposed to social isolation was once again devastating.
Confirming and extending previous observations, the researchers showed that social isolation leads to a broad array of behavioral changes in mice.
These include increased aggressiveness towards unfamiliar mice, persistent fear, and hypersensitivity to threatening stimuli.
For example, when encountering a threatening stimulus, mice that have been socially isolated remain frozen in place long after the threat has passed, whereas normal mice stop freezing as soon as the threat is removed.
Unless we're looking to create paranoid children, they are...
In adrenalized PTSD worlds that become prey for predators or double their risk of death, whilst giving them the functional equivalent of a 15 cigarette a day bad habit, we would do well to take heed of the vast amounts of medical studies on this point before Implementing socially isolating or distancing protocols in the classrooms.
And the point to make, and I've made this before, is that there are groups, organizations, like the one operating out of the British Cabinet Office and operating worldwide, called the Behavioral Insights Team, also known as the Nudge Unit, because it's nudging people in the direction that the authorities want.
These social distancing, social isolation measures, are being created and imposed not on the basis of health, but on the basis of how it affects the psychology of the target population, especially children.
You get children young enough, there's a very good chance they'll stay in that reprogrammed mode for the rest of their lives.
So the article says...
An examination of the physical reasons underlying why the former Senator John McCain and other prisoners of war subjectively experienced social isolation as identical to or worse than physical torture.
What happened to them in terms of social isolation actually was physical, as EEG studies going back to the 1960s have shown.
Diffuse slowing of the brain waves in prisoners who are socially isolated for more than a week.
Indeed, as recently as 1992, 57 prisoners of war, released after an average of six months in detention camps in the former Yugoslavia, were examined using EEG-like tests.
What those recordings revealed is brain abnormalities for months afterwards.
This is why when I say that they're rewiring the brain, that's not a metaphor, it's literal.
The article went on to note that the more severe EEG results were found in prisoners that had experienced two kinds of things.
One, they'd enjoyed either head trauma sufficient to render them unconscious, or they'd experienced social isolation.
The effects on the brain of those two things were the same.
When they were mapped and studied.
Without some sustained social interaction, the human brain may become impaired as one that has incurred a traumatic injury.
And the article says this.
We are currently undergoing the single largest planetary wide social experiment ever conducted on human beings.
On that, I disagree.
This is not an experiment.
This is made to happen because of the reasons that I'm talking about.
It's changing the psychology of the target population.
So social distancing is social isolation.
And it ends up here, this section.
It is a well-documented wartime technique, deployed for the better part of the last century by the CIA
against our worst enemies.
For the victims who have enjoyed social isolation, to a man and to a woman,
they experience it as torture.
A torture so inhumane that they refuse to endorse its use against even their own enemies.
Moreover, a plethora of studies show that social distancing and isolation can be fatal.
We'll come to that with the lockdown deaths in a second.
And when not fatal, are yet still a fate from which people do not ever fully recover.
The brain is irretrievably structurally altered.
And the part that is the most vulnerable and necessary to learning, not only in children, but in adults, is gutted beyond repair.
And that's just a little insight into what this is all about.
Do you know, Gaz, down the main shopping street in my town, Ryde, there's dots on the pavement every two metres, all the way down both sides of the street.
And people are walking along, you know...
They're absolutely not making a difference to where people go in that sense, but they're everywhere.
And even though people are just walking over them, they might as not well be there from that point of view, although the programming means that people do that anyway now.
But it's another subconscious stimulus that's feeding them instructions.
And you've got signs two meters apart.
These are all constant subconscious instructions that are changing the psyche of the people because the subconscious is the way they get in overwhelmingly and the subconscious is the target of all this stuff.
They put the stuff in subliminally because while you're walking along you might not see a sign but your subconscious sees it.
The conscious may not register it.
Your subconscious absorbs it.
And then the subconscious programming, subliminal programming as they call it, filters through to the conscious mind.
It's what the person thinks is their own thought and their own decision, but actually it's not.
It's been put into the subconscious and filtered through to the conscious.
And all this is going on.
And it's all systematic.
And it's all carefully calculated.
And our children are being left at the mercy of these psychopaths.
And the parents need to get their arses in gear because the consequences for the kids are going to be catastrophic.
You did really well to not break your stride then, Dad, with the phone going off.
I could hear it in the background. I was thinking, how is he holding it?
It must be from when you did Rimini.
And they were talking Italian the whole time you were speaking.
You've managed to hold it together.
Yes, that was...
Well, first of all, I couldn't work out where the bloody ringing was coming from.
It must have been from the other room, but it doesn't sound like it normally sounds like it's in the other room.
But the Rimini thing, yeah, just very quickly, for people who won't know about this.
I spoke in Rimini in Italy, and there was simultaneous translation into Italian.
But instead of the organizers having earphones for people in the audience to listen to the translation if they wanted, they just pounded it out into the hall.
So I'm speaking in English.
This was 10 hours, mind. I'm speaking in English and I'm hearing what I've just said coming back to me very loudly in Italian by the time, before I'd even finished the sentence.
So Yeah, you have to switch off to cope with that and also shouting over the translation pounding out into the theatre.
I mean, I could hardly speak at the end.
So yeah, a phone in another room.
Piece of cake, mate.
I remember sitting in the audience with Gemma for that and obviously I wasn't even talking but even I was like, I can't.
I don't know how I can cope with this.
So God knows how you did.
But on the subject of kids, I think I said in a previous video cast when we were chatting, when they were talking about reopening the nurseries, law goes to a wicked nursery.
And they emailed out everyone and they wanted to have a conversation with all the parents before they were opening up.
And I was very clear. I said, you know, she's turned two now, but she wasn't quite two at the time.
And I said... I'll send her back because it's a brilliant nursery.
And obviously, you know, me and Gemma need to work.
But at the same time, if this whole, you know, playing in squares drawn out and if she falls over and hurts herself, she doesn't get picked up and given a cuddle.
If that's the rules, then she's not coming in.
That's not happening.
And they're fantastic. And they said no.
And she's been a couple of times and...
And they've been great with her.
Because I refuse to allow that.
As a parent, I refuse to allow it.
And sometimes I take Elora out.
I don't know if you've seen Monsters, Inc, Dad, the film, you know, where the monsters...
Oh, yeah. Yeah, the monsters are scared of the kids because they think when the kids touch them, you know, it's death.
When you go out with Allura, obviously Allura doesn't social distance because she's a toddler, so she will just walk up to people.
And, you know, there's a lot of people that are like, hey, how are you doing?
And it's fine. But the number of people that recoil, it's like she's too dickhead, for God's sake.
And so that shows that they've obviously been, you know, completely psyoped.
But also Allura will then turn around to me like...
And so that's affecting her.
So that gives me the ump. But that's obviously, it's going everywhere.
You know, you can see it in the street, how people are with kids.
And I've had a few emails of parents saying that their kids, there was one particular one, which was horrific.
I forwarded it to you, Dad, where she was saying her son's, he's out in the garden.
She's trying to get him out in the garden.
He doesn't want to go out in the garden, but she's basically, get out in the garden.
He's in the house all day. This was during the major lockdown.
But he's coming in every 30, 40 seconds, a minute.
He's washing his hands. He's going outside again.
If he touches stuff, he comes back in.
He washes his hands because of the germs and he's frightened.
And I think he was five or six years old.
And I was reading it and I was just like, so where does this leave this poor kid?
You know, when he's... We're dealing with psychopaths though.
I'll keep coming back to it. One of the things that people have found difficult, some people have found difficult over the years when I've been saying this was coming and Pointing out the nature of those behind it is that the trouble people have in comprehending the level of evil, which I say is the absence of love, that is necessary to do what they're doing and to do the sort of things you just described with a child and so much worse.
They have no capacity for empathy.
They have no emotional consequence for anything they do and however they make people suffer.
And this is why you've got psychopaths like Gates kind of smirking when he's describing what he says are horrible things to come.
These people get off On other people's suffering and other people's distress.
And once you realize that, the penny drops, then you can start to comprehend the scale of pure, undiluted evil that's actually driving all this and driving the direction of the world.
And people either stop acquiescing to it and cooperating with it, or...
Evil will prevail.
And, you know, talking of evil, I've been talking from the start of this about how the lockdown will kill enormous numbers of people through many, many reasons directly and then through lack of diagnosis and lack of treatment because of the hospitals and doctors not being available.
And from other points of view, by people like in old people's nursing homes and care homes, where they've not had access to drugs and when they die because of lack of treatment, they're designated COVID-19, which brings us back to how we started out with the whole scamming of the figures.
But there's a very interesting article and a very...
Profoundly important one and relevant one on davidike.com as we speak.
But if people just put lockdown deaths into the search engine, if they're watching this after the day it was recorded, then they'll get the full story.
But what the article is about is an investigation that examined overall mortality numbers for Austria, Belgium, Denmark, England and Wales, France, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ecuador and New York City.
And it's supported by charts.
And here's some excerpts from the article.
We now have mortality data For the first few months of 2020 for many countries, and as you might expect, there were steep increases associated with the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in each one.
Surprisingly, however, these increases did not begin before the lockdowns were imposed, but after.
Moreover, in almost every case, they began immediately after.
Often mortality numbers were on a downward trend before suddenly reversing course after lockdowns were decreed.
This is an astonishing finding, it says.
But It's really not that astonishing because it was perfectly predictable and some of us did predict the obvious.
And here's some key All this leads us to the following questions.
Which we pose to all those who continue to defend the use of lockdowns as an effective means to prevent excess deaths.
Here's some of the questions.
Why was there no significant increase in overall mortality in any country that we have good data for before the start of lockdowns?
Well, I'll answer that because there was no virus.
But lockdowns started killing people.
Why does a precise and exact correlation exist between the start of lockdowns and significant rises in overall mortality?
Well, we've covered that. How is it that governments in every country impose lockdowns at precisely the same time relative to the future precipitous rise in their populations or overall mortality rate?
Because they were not getting the death figures necessary to justify lockdowns.
So they produced computer models projecting massive numbers of deaths if lockdowns didn't happen.
And so lockdowns were introduced at the same time pretty much.
Because it's essentially a globally dictated agenda.
And because of the lockdowns, then, people started to die in greater numbers.
And as the greater numbers of people were dying, greater numbers were being designated to have died from COVID-19 when they didn't.
And the death numbers started going up.
The death numbers literally started going up.
From all causes, because of the lockdowns and their effect, but also because they were designating the deaths COVID-19, the COVID-19 death figures were going up, which they were claiming to be, but weren't.
How is it, moreover, another question, That this moment in time, i.e.
the imposition of the lockdowns, happened to fall immediately before the rise in deaths.
If health authorities vastly underestimated the prevalence of the virus at the beginning of the pandemic, why did the virus nevertheless wait until lockdowns were imposed to suddenly start killing at levels which exceeded normal deaths?
Because we have the most intelligent, psychopathic virus in human history.
Not only that, it's woke.
So it doesn't affect people who protest and support the 1% front Black Lives Matter, but it will seriously attack you if you protest against lockdowns and their economic and health issues.
It gets worse than that, Dad.
There was a story from the Colorado Sun, and I literally burst out laughing.
Not only does it not kill people that protest, but the article said that across Colorado, Denver and Colorado Springs, that actually the Black Lives Matter protests actually slowed the infection rate of COVID-19 and actually saved people from getting it.
Well... This brings me to this point.
People have said to me, you say that the virus doesn't exist yet.
So why would they introduce a virus that didn't exist?
Why not just a real one, like from a biolab or something?
And the answer is control.
So if you introduce a virus, you're going to lose control of it.
You don't know exactly where it's going to go.
You don't know it's going to affect.
And if it's a serious, well, I say virus, did you know that it's never been scientifically proven that a virus causes disease?
You read that Stefan Lanker article I mentioned earlier, and you'll see the background to that.
And here's a book...
What really makes you ill?
Why everything you thought you knew about disease is wrong by Dawn Lester and David Parker.
And this very considerable book shows that virus and causing infectious disease or causing disease has simply never been proven.
If we say that if you introduce a pathogen, if you introduce something that is going to affect people's health, then you're going to lose control of it because you don't know who it's going to affect, you don't know where it's going to go.
Although there's a tiny number of people at the core that are driving this, there's loads and loads of people in the system, most of whom don't even know that core exists, who are essential to making the agenda of that core play out and be introduced.
They don't want rid of them.
But if you have a fake virus, which you're scamming people to believe is real in the way that I've described already, then you have control of it.
You can control when the cases go up.
You can control when the cases go down, which is why when we come into the winter, the cases are going to fly up because of not COVID-19, but because of redesignation.
So in every way, when you have a virus that's not real, you can attribute to it any virus Anything you like, you can add to the symptoms of it.
Oh, it's taste now.
If you've lost a taste, oh yeah, that's COVID-19.
And you see the symptoms being added to it.
You can do what you like with it because it's your creation.
It doesn't exist.
You can give it attributes galore because you don't have to conform to what the...
The disease-causing agent you claim actually is doing.
Of course, there ain't one. So you can say it's doing anything you like.
This is how it's all played out.
And once these, like I said earlier, once these pennies drop, if you hold on to the fact, and I see this in much of the alternative media as well as over the entirety of the mainstream, if you hold on to a fact that's not true, Then everything that comes from that, all your perceptions, all your assumptions that come from it, are flawed.
And what people are holding on to is there is a virus, right?
And there is some kind of infectious virus.
Now, some will interpret that in the mainstream.
Oh, it's a deadly virus and it's come out of China and basically it's sort of natural virus.
And others will hold on to that.
There is a virus. Oh, but the powers that be are exploiting it.
But both are flawed.
Once you let that go, there is no virus.
There is no COVID-19.
It's all a scam on that scale.
Then, whoa!
The fog, the mist clears and you see what is actually happening and why.
But you know as well, as you were saying, with the lockdown deaths, obviously they're going to bring lockdown in again.
So those deaths are going to go up again.
I was talking to Uncle Paul yesterday, who obviously lives in Leicester, and he had a hospital appointment that's been cancelled.
And so it's pretty easy to kill people without actually killing people.
Just don't do anything.
If I say, like, let's close the hospitals, people are going to die.
Of course they are, because they're not going to get treatment, which is exactly what's happening.
I don't actually have to go and physically kill anyone.
I just don't treat them. And a friend of mine who wrote an email that we've
spoken about a few times now from a nursing home in Liverpool said that it's
murder because he's trying to get medication in, he's trying to get doctors
to come out and see his residents when they're ill and they're refusing because
they say there's COVID in that nursing home so the doctors won't come
out and he said they've never tested anyone so they've just said well they've
got COVID because they've got COVID symptoms.
Well, as you mentioned, COVID symptoms is everything.
I mean, it's diarrhea now.
So if I eat a dodgy curry, oh, I've got COVID, have I? You know, they've added to it.
So it can be a million different things.
And you've only got to have one of those symptoms as well.
Do you know what I mean? I've got a fever or I'm over 38 degrees.
Yeah, I've been running. Well, what have I caught when I was running?
I must have caught COVID then, so I'm over 38 degrees.
What a load of absolute nonsense.
And yeah, so...
You know, they're bringing the lockdown again in October, November.
The deaths will soar. And as we've mentioned a few times, like, people say this, you know, well, what about deaths here?
What about deaths there? Now, deaths in New York were an odd one.
I mean, we've shared lots of videos where they're basically, they are killing people, like, with negligence.
They're killing people, putting them on respirators that they shouldn't be on, doing things, you know, putting settings on, putting things down their throat, killing people.
It's madness. People should watch it.
We've shared a lot of videos on davidart.com.
But there is also other things happening and I shared a story today where they were talking about what is the correlation between the flu shot that went out across Italy, across Spain, across various countries, China.
Um, and where it's mandatory by the way, um, and, and people getting symptoms.
Um, and then you've obviously got, you know, you've got, um, the radiation pneumosis, um, where we've spoken about 5g can cause symptoms.
All these things are being designated as COVID and you're seeing people going, well, you know, my friend works in a hospital and has seen something, something.
Yeah. But they haven't seen COVID mate.
They've seen some of it. Um, and we've spoken about it many times that things have happened in, in, You know, significant numbers, but in small pockets where things have been happening, but it's not an infectious disease.
It's quite simply not.
New York, for instance, 65% of the cases in New York City of people dying were people that had previously been self-isolating for six weeks.
How's that work then? How have they got COVID then?
They haven't because they can't have because they've been in a house for six weeks, so they can't have got it.
So why are they dead? Well, they're dead.
They're dead for reasons we talked about.
And like I say, once you let go of the idea that the virus actually exists, then all the pieces fall into place.
And I have been banned from YouTube and Facebook and goodness knows where else.
Immediately, pretty much, in terms of YouTube, immediately after I said in a live stream, there is no COVID-19.
And we're going back months now.
That's the penny drop they don't want people to have.
And it's the penny drop that clears the mist and lets us see what this is really all about.
Exactly. I mean, they used 5G, didn't they?
They used 5G as the excuse for banning.
And it made me laugh at the time because we've been producing content on 5G for like four years or something on YouTube, and it wasn't a problem.
In fact, they didn't even demonetize those videos because they demonetized our videos forever.
I mean, they demonetized us completely for a while, but before that, they would just pick select one.
So if you spoke about climate change, demonetized.
You spoke about vaccines, demonetized.
You spoke about Israel, demonetized.
You spoke about 5G, it was all right.
So then all of a sudden, you know, 5G was the reason we kicked off all these things.
Kicked off Vimeo, kicked off MailChimp, Facebook, YouTube.
And like you say, it's a patent lie.
It was nothing to do with 5G at all.
The thing is, if what you desperately do not want people to know is that there is no virus, you're not going to publicize the fact that you're banning me because I've said there's no virus.
What, they banned him because he said there's no virus?
What does he mean there's no virus?
What's he saying? So you...
Come up with another reason.
It's about 5G. It wasn't about 5G. If I'm saying there's no virus, how can I be saying that 5G is causing the virus?
I mean, don't be ridiculous.
But they had to find a reason that steered people away from why they were really banning me.
Which is when I said there's no virus.
Because that is when understanding of this whole situation comes into clarity.
And that's what they're desperate for people not to know.
Yeah, absolutely.
And we'll just keep shouting it. We'll just keep shouting it from the rooftops.
I've got... A pretty simple reply, really, when someone says, see, there's a fellow who lives across the road from me, and he said, what do you think about it?
And I went, it's bollocks. And he went, yeah, I think it's bollocks as well.
And I think nothing, I can't think of a better term, really.
I mean, maybe because I'm English, bollocks is just a great word.
But it's bollocks is a perfect response to it, because that's exactly what it is.
Are you going to go for a pint tomorrow, Dad?
Or are you not going to bother? No.
I'm not going to go to a pub where I have to queue outside or I have to use the app.
Well, I can't use the app. I don't use a mobile phone.
Or that I have to book me place or go to a pub where I have to stand so much apart or sit so many feet apart.
I mean, you know, you want to treat me like an idiot.
Well, you're not going to.
I just won't go.
And these pubs and to an extent restaurants too, who are opening because they are imposing on the government say so, these social distancing rules.
I simply not going to survive.
They're not going to get the throughput.
They're not going to get the throughput because not as many people can get in because of the social distancing and also because a lot of people are going to be like me.
They're going to say, this is not the experience of going to a pub or going to a restaurant, so I'm not going.
This is the thing.
If people simply stopped doing it, They would have to change the situation in many, many areas and instances because we wouldn't be cooperating with it.
Every time you do something that you think, oh, this is not right, you know, what's this for, but I'm going to do it anyway, then they'll just move on to the next thing.
So people have to...
To respond with their feet and not go into these places until the nonsense ends.
Because if they don't, the nonsense will not end.
It will just get more and more ludicrous and insane.
I was meant to have a hospital appointment yesterday.
You know, last week we were saying, oh, I need to phone them.
Well, they actually phoned me right afterwards.
To talk me through the protocol of going for my appointment.
And I just thought, can I stop you there?
She was lovely, the lady. I said, can I stop you there?
Do I have to wear a mask? She said, well, yeah.
And I went, well, I'm not coming then. So I've cancelled that.
My attitude towards the pubs is the same as yours, Dad.
So what I've done is I've ordered a five litre keg of beer, which is in my house.
And I've got three local pubs in my village.
And I'm going to go to each one of them and have a pint.
That's the plan. Now, I'm not giving my name to anyone.
I'm not using an app. I'm not wearing a mask.
I'm not doing any of the bollocks that I'm meant to do.
So I will either have, you know, three pints, one pints, two pints, or no pints, depending on, you know, how they react towards me.
But my attitude is the same.
Like I say, it's the same as yours. But what I want to do is I want them to know that the reason I'm not in there is because of that.
So what I don't want to do is just not turn up and then think, oh, you know, the numbers aren't great.
Maybe people are still frightened.
I want to go and say, I want a beer.
And then they can say, can I take your name and address?
And I can tell them to stick up their arse and leave.
Because I think that's a way to do it.
So then they will go, you know, we've only got five people in.
Well, yeah, but we would have had 20, but 15 wouldn't sign the thing.
That then alerts them to the fact that actually, you know, this new imposed nonsense isn't going to fly.
And hopefully then they will make a decision to, like the guy who runs the Marston's pubs.
He's not having it, is he? Which is fantastic.
That's a positive story. He's not having it.
Well, the more that people do what they're told to do, the more the impositions will just get worse, like I say.
And I talked last week about this pyramid of imposition and acquiescence that allows a few people at the top to dictate to an entire population.
And This situation with the pubs, I mean at the level of the pubs, They could say, we're not doing it.
We're not taking people's names and addresses.
We're not acting as agents for the state in that way.
They could do it at that level.
And some are, like you say, Marston's are much more chilled out on all that stuff than most of the rest of them.
But in the absence of the pubs doing it, we must do it.
As a population, we must simply not...
Abide by these impositions.
And then the impositions would, A, have to stop.
But also, if we're not abiding by them, they're not happening anyway.
It's all down to us in the end.
It's all right pointing in other directions.
We'll look at them and what they're doing.
They're only able to do it because we allow them to by acquiescing with them.
When we stop, it stops, but not until.
No. That's all it is, I think.
Peaceful non-compliance.
Just... I don't think we need a war and to march on the streets.
Just say no. Just say no.
I'm not doing it. And if enough people do that, the game's over.
And... That's what I'm clinging on to, Dad.
I'm clinging on to it, mate, that people are going to do that.
You know, that, no, no, I'm not doing this.
No, no, that's okay.
I just won't do that. And be very calm about it, very polite, and go, oh, no, I understand that that's, you know, what you're implementing here.
I'm just not doing it.
Okay. Well, that's the answer.
It was always the answer. It's been the answer throughout human history.
If you look through the entirety of human history, it's the vast majority acquiescing to what they're told by a tiny few.
Throughout human history, there's no exception to it, really.
And where there has been exceptions to it, where the majority have said, no, we're not doing it, then it's not happened.
Or the impositions of the government of the time has not been able to be implemented.
And so when large numbers of people go on the beaches and the government says, you shouldn't, but they go on anyway, well, the government's impotent.
Because in the sense of sitting on beaches in large numbers close to each other, The population in significant numbers has not acquiesced to the diktats of authority.
And in doing so, authority has no power.
That's the simple truth.
What can we do about it?
Stop acquiescing with your own enslavement.
Stop doing what a handful of psychopaths and idiots are telling you to do.
And then they can't impose their will on you.
So that's why they have the Stasi-like population policing itself.
And... People saying, I keep to the rules and they're causing this trouble with all these cases because they don't keep to the rules.
No, there is no virus, mate.
And the cases are from a test that's not testing for the virus, even if it did exist.
But because I've kept to the rules.
In other words, I have conceded My freedom to someone else.
I have cooperated with my own enslavement.
I'm a good person.
And you, who hasn't, you are the reason for.
What we don't like is happening.
This is the inversion that allows the few to control the many.
▲
Export Selection