'All Powerful Elite' Ponders David Icke and Shows It's Not 'All-Powerful'- Dot Connector Videocast
|
Time
Text
So, let's get started.
So, let's get started.
Hello ladies and gentlemen.
Hello ladies and gentlemen.
welcome to the David Ike Dot Connector videocast.
It's been a crazy week. Every week's been crazy during this whole lockdown period, but last week has been particularly crazy.
And censorship is the order of the day.
So first of all, hey Dad, how are you mate?
I'm alright, yeah.
I'm still sitting here, I haven't been deluded from here yet.
Give it time. Give it time.
So we've been deleted off Facebook.
We've been deleted from YouTube.
Pressure is mounting. Well, we've been deleted from Vimeo as well.
That happened earlier a few weeks ago now.
There's pressure to delete from Instagram, to delete from Twitter.
And yeah, probably to delete from that chair, to be honest, mate.
Yeah. This is the point, you see.
If what I'm saying is so ridiculous...
Then why do they have a problem?
Because people would say it was ridiculous.
And so what?
I mean, they control Silicon Valley.
They control the World Health Organization.
They control governments.
They control the mainstream media.
We've seen that so bloody clearly during these lockdowns.
And they control the institutions of state, control the Almost everything in terms of what they need to impose a perception of reality upon the people.
And yet I'm sitting here in this little room, in this little flat on the Isle of Wight, one bloke, and suddenly there's a massive problem that I have a different view of what's going on to the official narrative.
And what that tells you is, A, these all-powerful elites are not as all-powerful as they claim they are.
I never believed that.
Their power is the power that people give to them.
That's all the power they have.
And also, they're terrified of their narrative being challenged.
Now, if their narrative is true, then there's no problem with it being challenged.
I have no problem with what I'm saying being challenged.
I'll debate anybody. But they want to shut down debate.
And when people want to do that, it's because they don't think they can win it.
And, you know, lots of things have been said about me, or they're banning him because of what he's saying with 5G. Well, first of all...
What I'm saying about 5G is peripheral.
I'm not saying that 5G is peripheral.
It's absolutely not. But peripheral to what I'm saying about this virus.
Because what I'm saying is there is no virus.
So I'm not saying the virus is caused by 5G. I'm saying there is no virus.
And that...
That is the big one.
You know, most of the alternative media are not saying that.
They're saying it's some kind of bioweapon or whatever.
But I'm saying...
That there is no virus.
And it's all a scam.
And it's all been done by death certificates and fake tests and everything.
As one German doctor said, we don't have a new virus.
We have a new test.
And that's what they're terrified of.
Because when people realize the scam is so deep that they're actually terrifying people with a virus that doesn't exist, then everything unravels.
Because when you realize that that's been played on you, Then all bets are off.
There's no more, oh no, they'd never do that because if they'll do this, they'll do anything.
So it's a big play they've made to put in place all the things that I've been saying over the years that they want to put in place.
But in doing so, they're also very vulnerable.
Because if people realize actually what has gone on and what is going on and what this virus really is, a fantasy, then their whole house of cards starts to unravel.
And that's why they want to shut me up.
And they want to shut me up because truth has far more power than mendacity.
What we've seen, I mean, Gaz, it's so ridiculous.
Out of the woodwork, I would say from under the stone, have come all these groups that suddenly want to silence me.
We've had a story today.
That CNBC in America, it's owned by Comcast and NBC Universal, they actually went to Spotify To alert them to the fact that they still had a video of mine, a video interview of mine, on their platform.
And Spotify, of course, deleted it.
And they were kind of crowing.
This is a mainstream American TV operation.
Then they were crowing that they've got Spotify to take one of my interviews down.
And then during the week, and we have someone who is investigating all this, and they're coming up with some Extraordinary connections as they go deeper into this web.
And I'll just give you some of them.
The reason that is claimed that I was deleted from Facebook and YouTube, both owned by the same force, was because of an organization called the Centre for Countering Digital Hate.
Now, in my experience, anything that has hate in its title usually is a purveyor of hate.
So you see all the time, anti-hate organisations.
And what you see is hatred on their face.
And you see these anti-hate organisations whose very reason for being is to get the public to hate their targets.
And this is another one.
The Centre for Countering Digital Hate.
And so they came along.
They only kind of came out of nowhere in September 2019.
And there's some very interesting connections.
And these are just a tiny few of them.
Never mind getting really deep into it, which we will.
We're going to. And they suddenly started turning on me when I started challenging the whole virus narrative.
And it's center for countering digital hate.
But for some reason, they wanted to silence me because of what I'm saying about the fact there is no virus.
Well, sorry, where's the hate?
Do I hate the virus?
What's going on? Of course, it's just so unbelievably transparent.
Anyway, one of the patterns that I've seen, Gaz, over the years, is a man and a dog organization comes out of nowhere.
Great example.
And although it's got no support, and It's basically a man and a dog.
It has ridiculous influence in the corridors of power and with the social media platforms and stuff like that.
They think that, oh, well, we're doing this, no one will notice.
Well, sorry, I've been around a long time in this arena, and you are just fitting another pattern I've seen over and over again.
Now, this Centre for Countering Digital Hate The guy who runs it is a guy called Imran Ahmed.
And he's connected to the Labour Party.
He's written a book with this Wallace EMP, Angela Eagle.
And in some of his manifestations, he seems to have a lot, he claims to be a political advisor.
So he's connected to the Labour Party.
Then we have, also in this sense of countering digital hate, Morgan McSweeney.
Morgan McSweeney is a big-time Labour Party activist, and he was the campaign manager for the campaign for the leadership, which he won, of the Labour Party leader currently called Keir Starmer.
I describe Keir Starmer in a new book that I've just finished as being permanently on his knees with his tongue out, pointing at Tel Aviv.
So you get the picture, and so you should as I go on here.
And then there's a lady called Kirstie McNeill, who's the director of the Centre for Countering Digital Hate.
And she was a three-year advisor To 10 Downing Street.
And a speechwriter for the Prime Minister, the Labour Prime Minister, Gordon Brown.
And anyone who's heard any of his speeches will know that she's obviously not very good at it.
And this Centre for Countering Digital Hate is funded by something called the PEARS Foundation.
Ultra, ultra-Zionist Foundation.
And they do partnering sponsorship and funding with an organization called the Charles and Lynn Schuterman Foundation.
And the wife, Lynn, her maiden name was Rothschild.
And in this same building as the Centre for Countering Digital Hate, In East Finchley in London is another organization called Labour Together.
And one of the bigwigs in Labour Together is Morgan McSweeney of Centre for Countering Digital Hate.
These are real just surface connections I'm talking about.
When you get deeper into it, crikey, what a web.
And the guy who kind of is in charge of Labour together is a guy called Trevor Chin, an ultra-Zionist
and a funder of Kirstarma.
And another area that connects into this web is Bristol University as well.
And so they set out to get me banned from Facebook and from YouTube.
And what happens is...
That these platforms, they're looking for an excuse.
They've been desperate to ban me for a long time.
And then, so someone gives them the excuse.
Oh, we've had this report about this David I. Oh, we'll ban him then.
Okay, yeah. And that's how it works.
And then, what they haven't been able to do, as we speak...
It's getting me banned from Twitter.
So, as you well know, two days ago, we got an email from From a bloke, what was his name?
Kendrick MacDonald, who had some ludicrous fancy title.
And he works for something called NewsGuard, which goes back into the Neocon Network in America, which of course was involved in that Neocon Network in the Project for the New American Century and all that stuff relating to 9-11 and the War on Terror.
And he said that They had put together a report about people with big numbers on Twitter.
And this is the key, you see.
They're not bothered about people who get small numbers because that's not a threat to them.
They're frightened of people who get big numbers because they can start having an effect as the information circulates.
So you had the two California doctors who are local mainstream doctors television operation in California filmed their news conference in which they were pointing out the extraordinarily low rates per head of population of COVID-19 deaths.
That's even before you look at all the fake death certificates that doctors are also now confirming.
And They would have been allowed to just carry on, you know, 10,000, 20,000, yeah.
But they got 5 million in days.
And what did YouTube do?
They deleted it.
Purely because it was challenging the official narrative of the World Health Organization, which is owned by Gates.
And you only find censorship on the basis of What is challenging the official story in fascist and communist countries?
And that's what we're dealing with, fascism.
So this newsguard bloke, Kendrick MacDonald, was saying that they decided that what I was saying about 5G, this virus, was misinformation.
And they were going to put this report together.
It was going to come out, I think, today.
And I wrote back and I basically said to him, look, there's no point in me responding to you because you've got a concrete mind and your income depends on you having a concrete mind and no scruples.
Therefore, there's no point in me talking to you.
But I said, I'm just finishing a book.
And would you, for the book, send me all the evidence you have that I have...
Posted misinformation. And would you include all the sources, please?
And by the way, don't just say the authorities say, because some of us have self-respect and have a mind of our own.
We don't just take what the establishment authority says and repeat it, like he does.
So give me the...
Give me the sources of information to prove that what you're saying is true.
And, of course, there's been silence in the other direction ever since.
Because it's not about whether something's misinformation or not, or whether something's true or not.
It's about silencing.
That's what NewsGuard's all about.
That's why it was set up. Silencing people who are challenging the official narrative.
And for someone to work for NewsGuard and...
Get up in the morning and then have to shave, which usually involves looking in the mirror.
How they can do that without diverting their eyes when they do what they do is beyond my comprehension.
So watch for that. Newsguard exclusive.
David Icke's horrible.
Oh, thank you very much. Thanks for sharing that with me.
What a joke it is.
So I'm laughing at them, you see.
The worst thing you can do with these people is take them seriously because they're a bunch of prats.
So you laugh at them.
And when they throw you a challenge, you find a way around it.
It's, you know, and we'll go on doing so.
Just to go back to what you said, when you said how you're claiming 5G caused the virus and you're claiming there is no virus.
It does make me laugh because I see people say that a lot and you think that even when you're saying that, do you not realise that what you're saying is ridiculous?
And another thing that that campaign for digital hate or whatever they're called, what are they called?
CCDH for something? Whatever.
Center for Countering Digital Hate.
Yeah, some Orwellian bollocks.
Them. Exactly.
In their report, their big report, it said how you're saying there's no virus.
And it does bullet points.
So you're saying there's no virus.
It's dangerous to say that.
And you're also saying that a Jewish group is behind the virus.
What? Yeah. How does that make sense?
Exactly. Well, not even that.
Not only have you not said it...
I know what you're saying. I'm saying there's a Jewish group behind the virus, and I'm saying there's no virus, so work that one out.
Exactly. The point is, you don't have to be bright to be involved in these organizations.
I mean, some of the names that I've reeled off prove that.
What you have to be is willing to sell your frickin' soul.
That's all you need. And if you're willing to do that, then, you know, you'll be well rewarded, I'm sure.
Yeah. And that was the biggest clue for me when they said about the, you said a Jewish group.
I thought then, I thought, and then obviously I heard Rachel Riley was pushing it and it was like, ah, this is nothing to do.
Rachel Riley, reign of Britain.
It's nothing to do with coronavirus.
Absolutely nothing to do with it.
It's to do with the same old crew That we're trying to get your speeches banned, banned from Australia, all that stuff.
It's what it's all about. They've just jumped on the coronavirus.
And one thing they used to say, which used to make me laugh, I've heard it before.
David Icke is a Holocaust denier who says that Jews were behind the Holocaust.
What? How does that make sense?
Yeah. The fact that I'm talking about a secret society that has hijacked the Jewish community and I'm saying, look, the Jewish community need to know this information more than anyone else because they're being shafted.
And when you see the scale of the draconian lockdown in Israel, you know, this is not about Jewish people and not Jewish people.
Jewish people are being shafted like everyone else by their elite.
It's the elites that I'm exposing.
But, you know, that's what you get.
I mean, see, you've got this digital hate group.
We're supposed to be stopping hate.
All right. So why are you trying to silence me for having a view about a virus not existing?
Well, you know, it's crazy.
But it's all crazy because, like you say, it's about nothing but silencing people who are challenging the official version of everything.
And, you know...
Throw it. And I'll bat it back.
No problem. You know, I'm not taking you seriously because you don't justify being taken seriously.
But I would say this, guys.
And we, you know, I've talked about this in these video casts over the months.
The Labour Party, which we were a Labour family when I was growing up on a council estate in Leicester.
And, you know, my father always voted Labour.
You know, we were a working class family and you voted Labour in those days.
But what's happened, particularly since Blair transformed the Labour Party, I mean, it weren't fantastic before, but at least it had some scruples and some, you know, desire to make the world a better place for people.
But as soon as Blair came in, he hijacked it, completely transformed it, he called it New Labour.
And then...
It just became another Conservative Party.
I mean, there were two Conservative Parties.
One was called New Labour. But when Corbyn came in as leader, who was supposed to be this left winger, and had spoken out against Israel, treatment of Palestinians, that the Labour Party was going to get back to its roots.
Well, how it turned out Is that Corbyn had his spine removed when he entered the leadership.
And what he allowed to happen was a complete and utter takeover of the British Labour Party by ultra-Zionism.
And it's completely controlled now.
I mean, the leader, Keir Starmer, like I say, I've said in the book that he...
Spends his time on his knees with his tongue out pointing to Tel Aviv.
And the ultra-Zionist connections to these organizations that are trying to silence me is blatant and obvious.
And so the Labour membership and a lot of proper, decent, genuine Labour members have been thrown out of the party.
For anti-Semitism, including Jewish members, of course.
It's not ludicrous at all. It's nothing to do with Jewish people.
It's to do with control of all people.
And the Labour Party membership, those that were left, that are genuine, I mean, you've got to take control of your party back.
And if you don't think you can, then, you know, what are you doing being a member of it?
Of course, it's shafting you.
It's laughing at you.
It's treating you like the great unwashed while it drives its own agenda on behalf of forces in the shadows.
And so it's no surprise whatsoever that Labour Party people are involved in these organisations trying to silence me.
There's this guy, this Zionist, John Landsman, and this organisation within the Labour Party, another one called Momentum, You remember when I was doing a tour of British venues, they were protesting outside.
Momentum. And, you know, you've got a working-class lad from Leicester trying to challenge the establishment, and you've got momentum.
We're anti-establishment.
I'm outside protesting that you have a right to speak.
It's hilarious. And of course, it's all a joke because it's all a front.
And it's to do with A, taking over the Labour Party and B, using that to silence people that the people who've taken over the Labour Party want silence.
The Labour Party is now an irrelevance, except as a vehicle for the establishment to silence.
To have control of the opposition party in totality as well as the governing party.
So if people are still members of the Labour Party, if they don't think they can turn this around, it looks pretty horrendous, the situation now with Starber in control.
And his campaign manager, McSweeney, is very happy to see me silenced.
Then what's the point of being a member and giving them money, which they're going to use for their own ends and not yours?
Yeah, I think from public opinion, from what I've seen on replies to this group, digital hate group, people aren't buying it.
They're really not. And today there was an article, a ridiculous article in RT about yourself, which we were talking about before we started recording.
And the replies to that and the comments on that, people, they're getting rinsed.
People, they're not buying it.
They're really not. Well, what's happening, and this fake pandemic lockdown has had this effect on a lot of people, is people are getting streetwise.
They're getting more and more, and of course it's not the majority, but significant numbers now.
They're getting streetwise.
They're starting to see how the game works.
And I'll tell you a story about this RT reporter, Polly Boyko.
RT, that's supposed to be a semi-alternative station, have never had me on to comment about anything, even though I talk about all the things that they talk about.
And they've had people on all the time who are much further back from the cutting edge of what's actually happening.
And they're on all the time because they're nice and safe, really.
Or they're alternative a bit, but they're safe.
I never had me on. And then one day, out of the blue, we get a call from this Polly Boyko lady, reported with our team, asking if she can come and do an interview with me for an item, like quite a substantial item.
And I'm like, well, I'm shocked at that.
Anyway, okay. So she comes over.
And she's here for about two hours with a couple of fellows who are very nice.
And she went away basically saying, we're trying to get this out by Friday.
Friday, nothing.
Monday, nothing. Two weeks later, nothing.
Months later, nothing. And this was last, what?
September time. And here we are now in all these months later, now in May, still never gone out.
And, you know, she was asked from time to time, you know, is this how we're going to go out?
And there was this excuse and this excuse, none of which we believed, and it never went out.
And then, just before we started recording this, someone sent me an article she'd written on RT about her visit.
And not including the interview with me.
And it was most extraordinarily patronising and An unobserved article, unresearched article, you'll ever kind of see for a long time, because she knows nothing about me.
She knew nothing about me when she left, really.
She thought she did, but she didn't.
And... She said that she can't believe that I'm the person any establishment will be frightened of, or the UK establishment will be frightened of.
Well, they certainly won't be frightened of Polly Boyko, because she never does anything that would cause him any problem.
So, Ms.
Boyko, why this guy on the island of Y, why is he being censored by all these Silicon Valley corporations on the other side of the world?
Why is a BBC reporter claiming credit for having one of my interviews deleted?
Why did an ITV report basically claim credit for having Facebook deleted?
Why is a major network in America Claiming credit for having an interview of mine deleted on Spotify.
Why would they waste their time, Miss Boy Cole, if I'm no threat to them?
It's extraordinary. It was incredibly inept and incredibly un-streetwise about how the world works.
And, you know, people say, oh, it's the media.
Well, yes, it is.
But... Most of the media, some of it, absolutely, but most of the media is not manipulating knowingly.
It's just freaking clueless.
It has no idea how the world works.
It thinks investigative journalism is reading the morning papers and watching the newsroom TV. That's what they think investigative journalism is.
Not spending 30 years uncovering it full-time in 60 countries.
Oh, no. It's reading the morning papers and watching the newsroom telly.
So people like Boyko have no clue how the world works.
And they're considered to be semi-alternative, which is sad.
I looked at her for a while on RT, and I thought, well, maybe you're a bit more of a journalist.
And then I experienced...
This article and, you know, what happened as a result of it coming over here.
And I realized she's not.
So, but she's not alone.
You know, she must be surrounded by similar people who are also clueless about how the world works.
And how can you report a world when you don't know how it works and you don't understand the forces that are driving it?
You can't. You can just repeat what the common narrative is.
That's all you can do. And with RT, They ask some more challenging questions of Western events, because we're alternative.
But you watch their coverage of Russia, and basically they're standing straight, chin up, chest out, I think the media is really kind of the mainstream media has shown itself throughout this to people that, I mean, me and you, lots of people like us would just say mainstream media is full of crap, cause it's full of crap.
But a lot of people don't think like that.
A lot of people get their news from the BBC. But even they must be looking at this now.
Thinking that none of these reporters in the mainstream media are actually doing any research.
They're not doing any journalism.
They're going to the weekly briefings and then they're just saying whatever they said.
Whatever the government said, they report it.
They're not questioning it. They're not going, well, that doesn't make sense.
What about Sweden? What about this?
What about that? And also, people are looking at Neil Ferguson's computer models and the nonsense of them and starting to go, well, how is this guy advising the government?
Laughing at us, Gaz. You know, these people in America, they've been highlighted in so many places where the people that are telling us that a lockdown is essential to protect the health of the nation absolutely ignore it themselves.
And so we have a situation.
I mean, Professor Neil Ferguson must have no sense of shame at all and no self-awareness.
Because here's a man who has produced computer models, brackets, file under ludicrous, that projected half a million deaths possibly in Britain and two million deaths in America and high numbers in other countries if there was not a lockdown.
And it just so happens that Bill Gates, who funds Ferguson, His goal all along has been lockdowns, so he can get his vaccine in everybody.
And so the models were produced, which then justified, politicians thought, lockdown.
And then he starts rolling back the numbers.
Oh no, there won't be that many now.
But lockdown's been achieved.
And so you then look at the human catastrophe, economic, health, psychological, that has been visited upon these nations, America, European nations, Britain, etc.
Because of those computer models, you would think there'd be some contrition.
You'd think there'd be some rolling back.
And accepting that what he said was unsustainable, unsupportable.
But no, he's just doubled down on everything.
And then, in a period where he, in a kind of isolation period, when he is supposed to have had this coronavirus, somehow he survived, don't know how, but he did.
And his married lover girlfriend, at a time when her husband was supposed to have symptoms that could be the virus, she comes over to Ferguson's home and shacks up with him, which of course is breaking the lockdown rules, where only people in a family that live in a home Can be in that home and no one outside the family can visit.
But to Ferguson, that's not a problem.
Because he's not like everybody else, you see.
And you see this all over the place.
There's a mayor of Chicago.
Some lady.
Everyone in Chicago was banned from having their hair cut.
She has her hair cut.
And when she's challenged on it...
She says, oh yeah, but I'm the face of it.
Well, God help us if you are, but I am the face of it.
I'm the face of the city, so therefore I have to look my best in effect.
So I'm different to you.
I'm above you. I don't have to follow the rules that you do.
This is going on all the time because, you know, let's put it this way.
If you are Ferguson...
And you really believe this virus is dangerous and that your extraordinarily inaccurate forecasts were justified because it's so dangerous.
Well, you're not going to ask your girlfriend over, your married lover over, are you?
When you're still in that period of isolation.
And you're not going to have her come in when her husband is supposed to have some of the symptoms.
You're going to think, oh, this is dangerous, this.
No. Come over, darling.
Because they know that it's a load of bollocks.
Some of them do anyway. And it's...
They're laughing at us.
And like I keep saying over and over again, we need to ask ourselves how long before the need for self-respect kicks in.
And we stop accepting the impositions of these people, like Ferguson, who has shown himself to be someone you wouldn't advise you about at Legoland.
situation never mind real life and he's shown himself to have no integrity and hypocrisy almost beyond belief and this is the mentality of the people who are telling you that your livelihoods have to be destroyed and you have to be under house arrest.
How long are we going to let them do it and carry on doing this?