Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 4, 2020 - David Icke

19:48

China Today - The West Tomorrow - David Icke

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	♪♪ ♪♪
	♪♪ ♪♪
	It's been an interesting week and it's just extraordinary how when you work out how the world's controlled,
	by who and through what means, how easy it is to predict events day by day, week by week, year by year, decade by decade.
	I had my own experience of madness and predictable madness with an article this week in a British newspaper called The Observer.
	Now, The Observer is part of The Guardian Group.
	And The Guardian, The Observer, and another one called The Hysterically Called Independent are the most woke of British newspapers.
	In other words, they are fundamentally promoting the agenda of the 1%.
	That's what woke does.
	And one of their writers, a guy called Nick Cohen, Produced an article demanding that I be banned from YouTube and banned from social media because I was putting lives at risk by challenging the official story.
	So you see what I mean. This is what WOKE is there for, to promote the agenda of the 1% that it claims to despise.
	The whole world is an inversion.
	Hold on a second. Hello?
	I'm all right. I'm in the middle of the podcast.
	All right. All right.
	Ladies and gentlemen, ladies and gentlemen, this is Gareth talking to me.
	Okay, I'll talk to you later, mate.
	Bye. Sorry about that.
	I keep asking people not to call me at work.
	So anyway, we've got this Nick Cohen and he's demanding that I be banned.
	He's also demanding that Ofcom, the government regulator of broadcasting, mainstream broadcasting, which has threatened mainstream broadcasters with severe sanctions If they even have a single person on to discuss the possibility that 5G has any connection to current events.
	Mr. Cohen, who claims to be a liberal.
	He's not a liberal.
	He's the opposite of liberal. He's woke, which is the opposite of liberal.
	He wants...
	Ofcom to be given the powers in Britain to also censor the internet.
	So he's an absolute solid gold promoter of the 1% agenda.
	And when he posted his article on Twitter, He came out with a classic line.
	This is so classically woke.
	In fact, it's almost the best example I've ever come across.
	He said in the tweet that posted his article, the liberal case for banning David Icke, it takes some Mental gymnastics and some self-deception.
	In fact, it takes it on a world scale to believe that banning someone's freedom of speech to challenge the establishment narrative can somehow be a liberal case.
	But this is the woke mentality.
	They believe that...
	censoring anyone with a different view to them is somehow liberal.
	Because what WOKE has done, funded by the 1% and not least people like George Soros, Around the world they've hijacked the traditional genuine liberal left and they have inverted it into a tyrannical anything but liberal right and so there you go not that left and right mean anything anyway just terms to give us the idea we have choice when we don't So that's been interesting, but also extraordinarily predictable because the agenda that's unfolding now so blatantly with this fake pandemic is everything that this global cult has ever wanted,
	basically. As it turns the West into China, which is what I've been predicting for decades is what they plan to do.
	And without the acquiescence, indeed the promotion and censorship of the mainstream media, and I mean self-censorship, that great There's that great line that was to the effect of you cannot bribe or twist the great British journalist But seeing what they will do, unbribe, there's no reason to.
	And so the mainstream media worldwide just stays in its little parameters and will not challenge anything beyond them.
	And Cohen is an extreme example of it.
	But without this, if the narrative had been really challenged from the start, then it would have been shown to a worldwide audience To have been a pack of lies, and I'm going to get into that today as well.
	So, as I said and have been saying all these years, China is the blueprint of where they want to take the world.
	They've been able to incubate Their global blueprint within the borders of China, because China's a tyranny and they can do what they bloody like.
	The Chinese government is just a cult front.
	That's all it is. That's why they have so many connections to the cult operatives in the United States.
	That's why they have so many connections to Silicon Valley cult fronts in Silicon Valley.
	They're doing all the censorship now.
	Because the cult fronts in Silicon Valley are there to introduce the Chinese censorship control model to the West and the rest of the world, not just the West.
	And so it's no surprise that we've had this week the Atlantic magazine, which is 100% Elite.
	Promoting the elite agenda should publish an article by two.
	They're called academics.
	But you call anything academic these days that.
	That promotes the agenda and it's a neoconservative publication, neoconservative meaning that far right.
	Israel controlled.
	Um, network in the United States that was behind the, uh, well it was behind 9-11 for a start.
	In a wider sense.
	And it was behind the invasion of Iraq and the invasion of Afghanistan and all that followed.
	So you can see where they're coming from.
	And that whole network that was behind 9-11 and the invasions and devastation in the Middle East are the same network.
	Not just them. Neoconservatives are only part of it, only a strand in it.
	But it's the same basic network cult that is behind this fake pandemic.
	So this is the story.
	There's an article on davidite.com this week.
	Neoconservative publication The Atlantic has published an article authored by two university professors titled How Easy It Must Be to Become a Professor These Days.
	I mean, you know, What level of innate intelligence do you need to become a professor?
	Nil, it would seem. And I'm going to present an example here by two university professors titled Internet Speech Will Never Go Back to Normal.
	and subtitled, wait for it, in the debate over freedom versus
	control of the global network, China was largely correct and the US was wrong.
	These academics, which of course are just fronts for the for the narrative, for the agenda.
	Doing, doing its bidding.
	Want the Internet and control of the Internet to become like it is controlled in China because.
	as I've been saying all these years and years and years, China is the blueprint for the world.
	And what has happened as a result of this fake pandemic?
	The Chinese model has become massively the Western model.
	So The Atlantic has an editor-in-chief called Jeffrey Goldberg, Who once assured the world, the article says, that the coming invasion of Iraq will be remembered as an act of profound morality.
	Obviously another idiot.
	But, you know, it is easy to write these people off as idiots.
	But is it idiocy?
	Or is it agenda?
	I suggest it is agenda big time in the case of Jeffrey Goldberg and so many others.
	And This goes on to quote the article.
	In the great debate of the past two decades about freedom versus control of the network, China was largely right and the United States was largely wrong.
	Significant monitoring and speech control are inevitable components of a mature and flourishing internet.
	Oh, my God.
	And governments must play a large role in these practices to ensure that the Internet is compatible with the society's norms and values.
	It's incredible.
	These people have absolutely no shame.
	They talk about compatible with society's norms.
	Well, who imposes the norms?
	Who's imposed the norm that people are living with around the world today?
	The elite, the cult.
	And values. Would that be values like freedom of speech?
	What do you think?
	No, no. They're not values.
	Values are to enforce and to comply with the norms set by The cult.
	And so it goes on and it goes on.
	And, you know, I don't want to throw up, you know, in the middle of a podcast.
	So I'll leave it there.
	But you can see more and more this theme starting to move towards...
	The Chinese model is what we want.
	And people are receiving this from their schools.
	Parents are receiving this from schools now.
	And this is what it says.
	Prevent. Now, prevent is the British government's name for stopping radicalization.
	And again, like I've been saying over the years, they introduce anti-terrorism legislation, but the way it's worded, It means that they comply to everything.
	So the anti-terrorist legislation is with lots of hoax terrorist attacks and terrorist attacks carried out by often mind-controlled agent provocateurs of the cult.
	They were used to introduce anti-terrorism legislation.
	9-11 was done massively to do that when Arab hijackers weren't involved, as I show in the trigger.
	Anyway, so now they apply and always intended to apply these anti-terrorism laws across society to nothing to do with terrorism.
	So let me read what this police and These others have been sending out this week.
	Prevent. Online platforms can be a fun world.
	Ooh! Unfortunately, they can also be used to exploit vulnerable people.
	Yeah, and the governments do it all the time.
	If you are worried that one of your friends or family is showing signs of radicalization, seek advice or call the police on 101.
	And what is online radicalization?
	Well, are you worried about someone?
	Are they speaking to people who are spreading hate?
	And here's the one that it's really all about.
	Are they repeating conspiracy theories?
	They can't even spell conspiracy right.
	And so what is happening is the cult is moving in through its Silicon Valley and through its police to silence those who are in any way questioning the deeply, fundamentally, to its core, mendacious official narrative of what's going on.
	Now where else do they do that?
	Ah, I got it.
	China. Because it's the Chinese model being imposed upon the rest of the world.
	And so we have this story.
	Bill Gates, cult front man, Defends China's coronavirus response.
	Billionaire says Beijing did a lot of things right at the start of the pandemic and claims criticism of the Communist Party is a distraction.
	Well, of course, because the whole idea was to have the cult network that controls China and its response, its draconian response.
	To the outbreak of the quote virus.
	To with massive lockdowns and pulling people out of their homes, pulling people off the streets.
	That was meant to become the.
	Blueprint for how the West responded.
	Once this.
	I say fake virus.
	And the illusion created by fake death certificate diagnosis imposed from the top of the hierarchy around the world on doctors and medical staff and all the rest that I've talked about before.
	And the response to it had to be established in China.
	And so once that had happened, once the massively draconian measures had been imposed in China, so suddenly the Chinese numbers started to plummet.
	Which if you're manipulating the figures in many and various ways, which I have explained elsewhere, Then you can decide if it goes up and you can decide if it goes down.
	And so, oh, the Chinese draconian lockdowns have worked.
	We should do that.
	And so what did you have?
	You have the Gates-controlled World Health Organization and this Gates mouthpiece called Tedros, completely corrupt bloke from Ethiopia, saying that China had...
	We've shown how to beat the virus, fight the virus.
	And you had Bill Gates coming out and saying the same.
	China did a lot of things right at the beginning, like any country where a virus first shows up, said Gates to CNN, another cult operation.
	The blueprint of lockdown is the way to deal with it was therefore set exactly as planned all along.

▲