All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 7, 2020 - David Icke
45:39
Vaccine Big Brother Goes Full Fascist - David Icke Dot Connector Videocast
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
T-60 Olive Oil is a popular choice for people wanting to activate their full potential.
Improved sleep, faster recovery and more energy are just a few of the amazing comments received from our customers who take a spoonful a day.
Make C60 oil a part of your daily routine and see what it can do for you.
Activate your potential today at thec60company.com Hello and welcome to this David Icke Dot Connector video
cast.
Well those that have been reading my books and watching these videos over the years will know that I've been saying that the plan is for a global Orwellian and then some beyond Orwellian global fascist dictatorship and As we observe the world today, it's happening and it's happening with a gathering speed.
And it's happening because it's not something that's random, just being introduced willy-nilly.
It's because it's long, long been planned and what we've been experiencing are the stepping stones, what I call the totalitarian tiptoe, towards that end of total global control of the human race.
And every now and again you have a step that really does emphasise Where we're going and the speed that we're going there.
And this week a British law officer said she was contemplating the possibility of making those that question and expose the consequences of vaccines Should be subject to criminal law.
This comes in the same period that the government says that it is also contemplating, read, planning to make vaccinations compulsory.
And I'll go into that in more detail shortly.
But of course, mandatory vaccinations are being introduced again and again and again across the United States.
And it's meant eventually to be global.
And what we're looking at is narrative protection and imposition of To delete choice.
And if you look at what freedom is, freedom is choice.
The more choices you can make, the freer you are.
The fewer choices you can make, the less free you are.
And what's happening is choice is being deleted right across human society.
Systematically. And what I mean by protecting the narrative is this.
First, you dictate how things are.
The official narrative of what's going on and why and what the cabal wants the public to believe.
Now, of course, if that narrative is flawed, nonsensical, how can I put it, lying, then you have a big problem when you have the free flow of information and opinion to expose the fact that they're lying.
So protecting the narrative is to A, Dictate the narrative and then censor and silence all who question and challenge the official story.
We have seen this very recently with revelations that George Soros, yes him again, is funding organisations that are campaigning To have videos deleted by YouTube that question the official story of climate change.
Because the official story narrative cannot stand up to the free flow of information and indeed people's personal experience, you have to silence any Opposition any questioning so that what remains is only the official story for people to hear.
And we're seeing the same now with vaccinations.
Another official story coming out of the truly evil big pharma killing machine called Conventional medicine.
Mainstream medicine.
Which is just an extension.
When you go to your doctor or whatever.
It's just an extension of the pharmaceutical cartel.
That's all it is. Big Pharma.
Who make untold stunning amounts of money every year from you being sick.
Anyone think they have an interest in you being well?
But the official narrative of vaccines comes out of the big pharma cartel.
And then it's protected increasingly by government and Silicon Valley, all part of the same web, so that it's now being contemplated in Britain To make questioning and exposing vaccinations and their consequences a criminal offence.
And of course while all this is going on we have the coronavirus scare and there are some rather interesting coincidences going on with that and Relate to protecting the narrative.
Because what's happening now is information is being manipulated and deleted or banned.
That is questioning the official story of the coronavirus and where it came from and what it is and all the rest of it.
So here's just a few little coincidences.
Around six weeks before this coronavirus came to public attention in China, there was a simulation of a coronavirus epidemic.
And it was run by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Bill Gates Foundation, You wouldn't trust him to tell you the time in a clock factory.
And he wants to vaccinate the world.
He's one of the big global advocates of mass vaccination and spends enormous, fantastic amounts of money in pursuit of that.
Also, Part of the organising group of this coronavirus simulation, just before the real thing, was the World Economic Forum, which is this gathering of the 1% in Davos, Switzerland every year.
The same World Economic Forum Which Bill Gates is heavily involved.
That set Greta Thunberg on the road to global stardom.
Promoting the climate change hoax.
And she was invited back this year to Davos.
To again berate the people who invited her.
The 1% that are the force behind the climate cult and the climate change hoax.
It's a small world when you go beyond the official narrative.
Now, Johns Hopkins University is also involved in this simulation.
Now, Bill Gates also funds the group that owns the patent.
To the coronavirus. And that group is now, it is said, working, I bet they're further along the road than we're being told, to say the least, on a vaccine.
Now, if there's an epidemic and you're frightening people through the classic way to frighten humanity, which is fear of death and fear of the unknown, Then you're going to get enormous public support from people who say, yes, people must be vaccinated.
Save us! And those who won't be vaccinated, they need to be arrested and all that.
So it's a classic, potentially.
Problem, reaction, solution.
Create the problem, get the reaction, and offer the solution.
A global vaccine and what will be in it.
If anyone says, oh I know what will be in it, they're lying.
Very few people have to know what's in it for it to globally circulate.
The other part, or there are many elements of it, but the other part of the simulation of reacting to a coronavirus pandemic was control of information about the pandemic.
So in this simulation, they are talking about anti-vaxxers.
People, you know, really stupid people who question, given the enormous number of children alone who've been damaged by vaccines, who question whether they should get their child vaccinated.
And anti-vaxxers are now in the gun sights of this cabal because they want to protect the narrative.
This simulation talked about banning conspiracy theories, false rumours.
Who decides if they're false?
Who decides if they're a theory and not true?
They do. To intervene in the flow of information, they talked about some countries shutting down access to the internet entirely, shutting down websites, arresting people. For harmful falsehoods.
Who decides they are falsehoods?
They do.
And of course, Silicon Valley was talked about in the simulation as needing to censor information about this coronavirus virus.
simulation story so that only the official narrative would be heard.
And they also talked about the need for centrally controlling information about the virus and what people were told about it.
Now, a matter of weeks later, All those things are starting to unfold with the increasing censorship of information about this real virus that seems to be circulating.
And It's worth, I mean, we don't know where this coronavirus is going to go from here, but it is worth to put it in perspective at this moment that according to the Centers for Disease Control in America, and this is a report by the Associated Press from 2018, With the headline, 80,000 people died of flu last winter in the United States.
The highest death toll for 40 years and according to the CDC, these death rates from flu in the winter in America have ranged from 12,000 to 56,000 and then to 80,000.
A bit of perspective as things stand, but we don't know where they're going to go.
We do, however, know where freedom is going, which brings me to this story this week about possible law changes to make Challenging and questioning and exposing the consequences of vaccinations, a criminal offence in Britain.
Which is another expression of what that coronavirus simulation by the 1% was talking about and promoting.
This is the story.
Posting anti-vaccine propaganda on social media could become criminal offence, law commissioner says.
This is a new law commissioner.
She must be intelligent, you know.
Otherwise they wouldn't appoint her, would they?
She's called Penny Lewis.
And she's leading, it says, a wide-ranging review into whether the UK's offence and abuse laws are fit for the social media age.
Brackets. Massively increased censorship coming.
Posting anti-vaccine propaganda on social media could become a criminal offence, even if those promoting it believe the pseudoscience, the UK's new criminal law commissioner has said.
Notice, official story, always science.
What was that, Greta?
Listen to the science.
If only you would.
And anything that questions the science, i.e.
the official narrative, is pseudoscience.
It's all in the language.
Penny Lewis revealed she is considering whether laws should be amended to lower the threshold of criminality for posting false information online that endangers lives.
Let me just translate that from the Orwellian.
Posting false information.
Who decides if it's false? They do.
Who decides if questioning vaccines and their consequences is harmful as opposed to the consequences of the vaccines, which are a provable fact?
They do. And it comes...
As the health secretary Matt Hancock said in September that he was looking very seriously at making vaccinations compulsory for state school pupils after the UK lost its official measles-free country status due to the steady fall in the MMR immunization rates.
So this false information endangering lives What about all the vaccine injured children since vaccinations began?
Is pointing this out that there are vast numbers of vaccine injured children in the vaccine era endangering lives or could it be saving some?
And here we have With the evidence that vaccines damage children, having the health secretary, i.e.
just a puppet, talking about having those vaccinations mandatory.
Currently, people are protected from prosecution if they sincerely believe the misinformation they publish under laws designed more to tackle bomb hoaxes than internet health conspiracies.
I've been pointing this out for so long.
What you do is you pass laws And you do it on the basis of protecting people from terrorism.
And then once the law is passed, you apply it across the board to many other things that are nothing to do with terrorism.
So. Professor Lewis, she's a professor, must be intelligent.
Well, that's the mainstream media done for in a sentence.
However, she cited anti-vaccination posts and people advocating alternative treatments for cancer instead of chemotherapy as areas where lives could be endangered.
Of course, they're not endangered by chemotherapy, which as one doctor described it, is like weed killer, which destroys the human immune system.
So, she says...
If the purpose is actually not to cause annoyance or anxiety, but they think they are doing the right thing by posting false information, that we call false, about a vaccine, for example, it is then there should be a recklessness based fault element or even a lower criminal threshold.
So where they've really not done their homework, or especially if they have, And they've been negligent in the way they have spread this false information or disseminated it.
I think we need to look into whether there is a role for criminal law in relation to false health information.
Well, that's big pharma done for!
Professor Lewis became one of the law commission's five commissioners last month.
And will lead its work drawing up reforms to modernise swathes of the UK criminal law over her five-year term, starting with a wide-ranging review of how Britain's communications laws function in the social media age.
Brackets. Watch for more mass bloody censorship.
And... She said, women face online hounding that hounds them off social media and silences them.
Oh my goodness, Ms Lewis.
And all the mothers who care about their kids and the dangers of vaccinations.
You want to silence them?
What happened to them?
Being hounded by you off social media.
Ah, but they're wrong.
So why should they have freedom of speech?
One model the new law commissioner is looking at for modernising the UK's laws is New Zealand's approach.
Can't bloody wait.
Of criminalising online messages based on the harm they cause, with harm largely defined as emotional distress.
So if you get emotionally distressed, and of course people are being told to get emotionally distressed about everything, then that justifies destroying someone else's freedom of speech.
What about all the abuse that I've had over the years and continue to have?
Still get it. What if I'm emotionally distressed?
Are they going to censor that?
No, of course not.
I don't want them to.
People want to be an idiot.
They should be allowed to be. It's called freedom.
But it's about only censoring that which challenges the official narrative of everything.
And this is why people are being pressured to be offended by more and more things.
Because once you move the law to emotionally upsetting people as a criteria for censorship, then the more people you can get to be offended, the more emotional distress you generate, and therefore the more censorship you can justify.
Now, just to give you a feel of the scam in our midst, these are some recommendations by the Centers for Disease Control in the United States that should be protecting the public, not least from Big Pharma, who has the CDC in its bloody pocket.
These are some of the recommendations on how to generate a bigger and bigger take-up of the flu vaccine.
And this just shows you just what manipulation is going on and why it's nothing to do with your health and well-being.
Okay. Recipe, recipe for fostering public interest and high vaccine demand.
Here we go.
Medical experts and public health authorities publicly, e.g.
via the media, state concern and alarm and predict dire outcomes and urge influenza vaccinations.
No, don't just tell the truth.
Frighten the shit out of them!
This results in significant media interest and attention, framing of the flu season in terms that motivate behaviour, e.g.
as very severe, more severe than last or past years, and deadly.
Does this bring current events to mind in any way?
It goes on, unfortunately.
Continued reports, e.g.
from health officials and media that influenza is causing severe illness and or affecting lots of people, helping foster the perception, not the truth, the perception that many people are susceptible to a bad case of influenza.
Visible, tangible examples of the seriousness of the illness, e.g.
Pictures of children, families of those affected coming forward,
of people getting vaccinated, the first to motivate, the latter to reinforce.
Cool.
Nancy Pelosi impression.
.
It's mind control!
That's all it is. Perception manipulation to get you to do what the authorities want you to do.
So they're lying, Ms.
Professor Penny Lewis.
Criminal law for them?
Not a chance.
Then... You'll enjoy this, Ms Lewis.
Let's look at some of the ingredients of vaccinations.
Ingredients and that used in the preparation.
Which this lady is now contemplating.
The possibility of making a criminal offence to expose stuff like this.
Ingredients and substances used in manufacture include Aborted fetal tissue.
Oh, come on, Johnny.
Gotta get your vaccination.
Aluminium. Mercury-based thermerosol.
Gelatine. Human serum albumin.
Found in blood plasma, apparently.
Sorbitol. And other stabilizers.
Emulsifiers. Taste improvers.
Antibiotics, egg proteins, yeast proteins, formaldehyde, which is used to embalm dead bodies.
Acidity regulators, human cell strains, animal cell strains, genetically modified organisms, recombinant DNA technology, bovine products.
Aluminium malone is a brain toxin.
And then there's the long list of Of consequences that people have suffered from vaccines and kids have suffered.
Everything from meningitis, swelling of the brain, immune system disorders.
In the mass vaccine era, autoimmune diseases, when the body's immune system attacks itself, attacks the body, have bloody sword.
Why? Because the immune system treats the vaccine.
As a attack on its well-being.
And because the vaccine's attached to the body, it attacks the freaking body.
And one of the other kind of main themes of vaccine damage is brain damage.
And with all this.
All this.
Bye.
As a potential consequence, we have fascist, because that's what we're talking about here, fascism, fascist governments imposing mandatory vaccinations, meaning they are condemning to damage at least some of the people, That they are enforcing the vaccines on statistically.
Bloody obvious.
And contemplating introducing a criminal law for questioning and exposing those consequences.
If that is not fascism, then give me a better bloody definition.
Do you know in the 1980s, the pharmaceutical cartel, which owns the bloody government,
not least through political funding, in America, managed to get passed a law giving them immunity
from prosecution for the consequences of their vaccines?
Thank you.
And something else.
The justification given by Congress in the United States was that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe.
I found this on the Cornell Law School website.
Giving this quote about the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which gave Big Pharma this immunity in America.
This is what it says.
Subsection B. Unavoidable Adverse Side Effects Direct Warnings This provision sets forth the principle contained in Comment K of Section 402A of the Restatement of Torts, That a vaccine manufacturer should not be liable for injuries or deaths resulting from unavoidable side effects, even though the vaccine was properly prepared and accompanied by proper directions and warnings.
The committee has set forth Comment K in this bill because it intends that the principle in Comment K regarding unavoidably unsafe products, i.e.
those products within the present state of human skill and knowledge, cannot be made safe.
apply to the vaccines covered in the bill and that such products not be the subject of liability in the tort system.
Immunity from prosecution for the consequences, overwhelmingly on children, of their vaccines
is passed on the basis that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe.
And then the same government and others around the world make compulsory Vaccinations for children designated unavoidably unsafe.
And Professor Penny Bloody Lewis contemplates making it a criminal offence to expose these
basic facts. That is fascism.
That is tyranny.
By any criteria.
So, as a result of this immunity from prosecution for Big Pharma, a vaccine injuries court was
set up in the United States to use tax payers money to pay compensation to those who were
again overwhelmingly children, Who are damaged by vaccinations.
Up to late 2019, that court, with an incredibly high bar to prove your case...
Had paid out $4.2 billion in compensation.
On the damage from vaccines, they are now making compulsory and even contemplating Making it a criminal offence to expose.
When I've been saying all these years, 30 now, that this was coming, people thought, that's too far-fetched, mate.
You're just crazy.
And now, here we are, facing it.
See, what happens is, there's a web.
And this web has many elements that answer to the spider in the center of the web.
So big farmers part of the web and governments are part of the web and the climate cult is part of the web and the banking system is part of the web and so on.
Media overwhelmingly part of the web.
Silicon Valley corporations controlling information Absolutely part of the web.
Created by the web. And so the web moves as one unit while in the public arena, it appears that different people, different organizations are working randomly.
Actually, you go to the web level, they're working as one unit.
So Big Pharma comes out with the vaccines.
And the official narrative of what they do, which can be seriously questioned and exposed as being crap.
And other elements of the web, government, Silicon Valley, etc., they then protect that narrative from exposure.
So here we have now The official story of vaccinations and whether they're safe or not being decided and then protected by government etc by a big pharma cartel that is a killing machine.
If you look at the figures for the biggest killers in America alone you'll find they are Cancer, heart disease, and the frickin' treatment based on Big Pharma products.
And those treatment figures are only those Where some doctor has actually written in the diagnosis on the death certificate that they died because of elements of the treatment.
Far more will be written away somewhere else to hide the truth of what really happened.
You put them together and you've got the biggest cause of death in America is the freaking treatment.
And this is the same big pharma who decides the narrative of vaccines.
. .
If we don't start taking our power back from these psychopaths, then this world is going to be a very different place very, very soon.
In fact, we're moving there now.
With enormous speed.
Then you see that Big Pharma owns the politicians in America through funding.
You see the revolving door constantly, infamously, between Big Pharma corporations and government departments that are supposed to police and protect us from those Big Pharma corporations.
And you see the scale of the scam that's going on, and now you have Silicon Valley censoring those that are putting out non-narrative information about the coronavirus out of China, and again, another expression of the web.
And all of those different elements ultimately answer to the same masters, the masters that are driving the direction of human society.
So, if people want to defend their freedom and their right to make decisions about their children and their health, well, where they say you cannot send your child to school unless you They're vaccinated.
We have to bite the bullet and not send the children to school.
Which has two benefits.
A, you have freedom to choose what goes into your own body and your child's body.
And the other benefit is that they don't go to school to be perceptually programmed.
Because that's what school is, not education.
Perceptual programming. And if we don't do that, then we are acceding to fascism.
A definition of which has to be not having the right to decide what goes into your own
body and into your child's body.
And where, they say, you cannot criticize vaccinations.
you Or it'll be a criminal offence.
Then we have to criticise vaccinations.
Otherwise, we are conceding to fascism.
And I'll say this to you, Ms.
Professor Penny Lewis.
If you do go through with this fascist law of making...
Exposure of vaccinations a criminal offence.
Well, you're going to have to come for me.
Because I ain't shutting up.
Got that?
▲
Export Selection