Dec. 2, 2019 - David Icke
13:50
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| T-60 Olive Oil is a popular choice for people wanting to activate their full potential. | |
| Improved sleep, faster recovery and more energy are just a few of the amazing comments received from our customers who take a spoonful a day. | |
| Make C60 oil a part of your daily routine and see what it can do for you. | |
| Activate your potential today at thec60company.com I've just been watching on American television the reports about the hearings into Trump with regard to impeachment. | |
| And anyone that's read my books or Watch my stuff in any way will know that I'm no supporter of Trump. | |
| I'm not a supporter of any political party because ultimately they are the same political party if you go deep enough to the controlling core. | |
| And so when you look at the situation in America, for instance, you have Trump Controlled by the same network that controls the Democrats as you had in the period of Obama and Boy Bush and all of them. | |
| And so I'm no supporter of Trump. | |
| But if we're going to be mature and fair and look at things dispassionately... | |
| Then you don't see politics in black and white. | |
| You don't say this all good and this all bad, which is basically how much of politics is perceived and played out. | |
| So if Trump says something, then it's bad by definition, even though it may be valid, because no one's ever lived a life and never said anything that's actually Not valid. | |
| Everyone, no matter who they are and what their background, has some things to say that have validity. | |
| The trick is deciding which are valid and which are not. | |
| And that comes to our personal perceptions, of course. | |
| And if we are going to be, like I say, fair, then we have to look at situations dispassionately. | |
| People may not like Trump, but the situation that's happened during his presidency is clearly a scam to try to get rid of him. | |
| I mean, there's deeper levels of this because Trump is controlled by Israel and the Democrats are controlled by Israel, even though some of them may speak out about Israel, though increasingly less so. | |
| When you look at the funders of the Democratic Party, people like George Soros, you know, there is a common theme. | |
| And, you know, people say, oh no, George Soros, he's not pro-Israel. | |
| Well, actually, I say that's a scam as well. | |
| And that actually the same force is funding both sides and playing one off against the other. | |
| And I think Trump is really being played off one against the other. | |
| By this network that I call Sabbatean Frankists and I expose at length in the trigger. | |
| So we have a situation where immediately Trump was elected. | |
| You had the Russia gate as they call it. | |
| Everything's a gate these days since Watergate. | |
| You had the Russia scandal. | |
| Where Russia interfered in the 2016 election to get Trump elected because that's who they wanted to win. | |
| And of course we had years of it with alleged but not really or in any way shape or form media platforms like MSNBC and CNN pushing this Russia collusion hoax And of course, in the end, when it came to the evidence of Robert Mueller, the guy who was appointed head of the FBI two weeks before 9-11 and then oversaw the non-investigation of 9-11 with Sabbatee and Frankist agents, | |
| as I expose again in the trigger, he came out in the end, Mueller, with his... | |
| Evidence that found no Russia collusion. | |
| And the idea was to hem in Trump so that he would not be making any overtures to get closer to Russia and come to some kind of harmony with Russia, because that's not what this network wants. | |
| And so we had that for years, and then eventually the Mueller evidence destroyed that through lack of evidence. | |
| And almost immediately afterwards, we had this whole Ukraine thing started. | |
| Now, the Democrats, who were no longer the Democrats that used to be, by the way, just like the British Labour Party is no longer the Labour Party that used to be, They are now just expressions of this woke agenda, which is all about creating Marxist centralized societies on behalf of the 1%. | |
| So they have a hierarchical structure of imposition through which the 1% can control everything. | |
| This is what, of course, the climate change hoax is all about, justifying that centralization of power globally to save the world. | |
| And so we have had this hemming in of Trump, whereby the network controls his administration, which is why Israel gets everything that it wants, virtually. | |
| And you have the Democrats pushing against him, funded by people like George Soros. | |
| And so when The Russiagate hoax came to a conclusion, damp squid conclusion. | |
| Immediately, virtually immediately, you had this kicking off of this Ukraine situation where, like I was just going to say a few minutes ago, in 2016, immediately after the election, the Democrats announced they were going to impeach Trump and get rid of him. | |
| They said that he should be impeached over Russia. | |
| That got nowhere because of lack of evidence, like I say. | |
| So now we have another impeachment excuse, which is that he did a deal or demanded a deal with the president of Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden, a possible opponent for Trump at the next election. | |
| If that happens, then basically I will... | |
| I will be shocked, given that Biden is so incompetent and blatantly so. | |
| Anyway, that there be an investigation into Biden and his son, who was paid enormous amounts of money, both by a Ukraine energy company and by Chinese sources. | |
| When Joe Biden was vice president to Obama with the brief of overseeing events and happenings in Ukraine and China, of course, the stench almost makes you want to leave the room when you look at The background to that. | |
| So the claim is that Trump demanded what they're calling a quid pro quo with the president of Ukraine. | |
| You investigate the Bidens publicly and what happened in that whole Ukraine deal. | |
| And we'll give you military aid. | |
| But if you don't do that, you won't get the military aid. | |
| That's the claim. And it's being pushed by this guy, Adam Schiff, an ultra-Zionist who heads the House Intelligence Committee. | |
| And he was one of the great pushers of the Russia hoax. | |
| And he's just found another excuse. | |
| He's a very, very strange man with very, very strange eyes if you ever see him in action. | |
| I recommend it for research purposes. | |
| I don't recommend it for any other purposes because it's horrible to see the guy at work. | |
| He's such a blatant fraud. | |
| And this whistleblower came along. | |
| Turns out to be a deep state operative. | |
| And talked about this phone call that Trump had with the President of Ukraine. | |
| And this quid pro quo was demanded. | |
| Well, actually, that is not clear in the transcript. | |
| But this week, we've had the hearings, the impeachment hearings on Capitol Hill, the House hearings. | |
| And a series of people who have axes to grind with Trump have given evidence that turned out to be not evidence to support the claim. | |
| And I've just been watching reports about this EU ambassador, Gordon Sondland, a Zionist, who gave evidence on Capitol Hill to Well, what happened? And this shows the manipulation here. | |
| He makes an opening statement in which he says that there was a quid pro quo with Ukraine in the terms that I've just described, and that everyone knew about it in the administration. | |
| And of course, the CNNs and the MSNBCs and all these other people then go with that. | |
| Oh, evidence. | |
| Job done. | |
| Game, set and match. | |
| Trump's guilty. And then, much later, in questioning by Republican representatives, Sondland said the opposite. | |
| He was asked directly, did President Trump ever tell you there was a pro quo that military aid was dependent on this investigation being launched? | |
| And Sondland said, no. | |
| And he quoted Trump as saying to him, this is not a quid pro quo, just get Zelensky, the Ukraine president, to do the right thing. | |
| So, right towards the end of his evidence, after his opening statement has gone out all over, as, oh yeah, this is it now, he's done for, Sondland Is then saying the opposite to what was said in his opening statement. | |
| And he was quite rightly asked, why are you telling us this now? | |
| Why wasn't this in your opening statement? | |
| And the answer appears to be along the lines of, well, I couldn't get everything into the opening statement. | |
| What? You couldn't get in the very core of what is being claimed about Trump. | |
| You couldn't get in the fact that he never said that to you, but said the opposite. | |
| It's a scam. | |
| And like I say, I'm no Trump supporter. | |
| But if you're going to be fair and you're not going to be scammed by the system, the biggest thing you need in observing the political world is not being partisan. |
Export Selection