Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 11, 2019 - David Icke

01:53:58

9/11 - The Dots Connected - David Icke Dot Connector Videocast

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you oh
	oh oh
	oh Here we go again higher sight chatters
	Bringing the heat and getting into the meat and charting another course across the vast conspira see from sunny, San
	Diego I'm Greg Carlwood. And in this modern era, it seems that the oily appendages of the nefarious few are tightly wound around every sad and backward sector of our society.
	And while we wave the flag of freedom, we have systematically slipped into an Orwellian nightmare surveillance state.
	Being processed like cattle at every major gathering, being poked, prodded, and scanned just to get on a routine flight, and cheering on the arrival of facial recognition technology and cameras on every street corner.
	And that's just at home.
	Never mind the perpetual war cycle, the harvesting of our community chests for the endless cost of the military-industrial complex, and the countless loss of life that is stacked up in the wake of their never-ending operations.
	It's a sad situation that can clearly be rolled back to the true catalyst in 2001, the tragic events of 9-11, where the sinister psychopaths of the power pyramid put in motion a covert operation to craft the world they wanted, carried out their false flag attack, and have been feeding off the trauma they've created ever since.
	We know the official story is full of holes, falling apart even under the most mildly critical eye, but many unanswered questions still remain.
	Or that is to say they did until the recent release of The Trigger, David Icke's 800-plus page book, breaking down the entire event and the death cult network behind it.
	With a level of detail and clarity I have found nowhere else.
	You can get a copy of The Trigger or any of his outstanding books and video presentations on his website, davideich.com.
	And lucky for us, he's back in the higher side saddle and ready to ride, so let's get into it.
	You know him, you love him, a true conspiracy culture staple and the waker of the masses, the renegade himself, David the Dot Connector.
	Ike, welcome back to THC. Thanks, Greg.
	What a great introduction. I try.
	Thank you. And I appreciate you coming back so soon.
	You are a man of your word, and you are not kidding about the level of detail in The Trigger.
	Definitely one of the biggest books I have now.
	Honestly, given all the epic level work you've done at this point, I wondered if we really needed another 9-11 book in 2019.
	Obviously the people hanging out here are well aware that the official story is a big lie.
	But where the trigger really shines for me is with the questions of who really did it and why.
	Because I haven't heard of anyone framing up this network and its origin the way you do in this book.
	Well, the book is two books.
	The first half of the book demolishes the official story of 9-11 from the perspective of taking each aspect of it and taking it apart, which basically leaves no aspect that stands up.
	But the second half of the book, as you say, tells an amazing story, picking it up in the 17th century and
	bringing it through to who actually did it and why.
	And of course, part of that section details the scale of censorship that is going on worldwide, particularly in the
	West, to stop this death cult, which is what it is, being revealed.
	And I'm sure we'll get into that as we go along, what that censorship is and why it's being done and how it's being done.
	Because the United States is absolutely controlled in terms of the Washington establishment by this death cult.
	Obvious, yes. And You can clearly see how the agenda that has rolled out since 9-11 definitely can all be brought back to, as you say, the trigger.
	And a lot of people speculate on who's to blame.
	Some say Saudi Arabia, some say Israel.
	And it turns out that, you know, as far as your work has shown, these are just two heads of the same snake, a snake that might have many heads.
	It does.
	And you can start to see why there was such a Saudi Arabian input into 9-11 in terms of the alleged hijackers.
	Most of them were Saudi Arabian.
	And there have been efforts, of course, to take on Saudi Arabia and their involvement through the courts.
	But unless you connect the dots...
	You can miss the real target and what I do in the trigger is pick up this death cult in the 17th century and a man called Sabbatai Zevi.
	Sabbatai Zevi was a Sephardic Jewish man who claimed to be the Jewish Messiah.
	Now What happens when you say something like that is, you're anti-Semitic, you are!
	That's the defense mechanism which we'll get into.
	Actually, the opposite is the case in terms of Zevi, because he started a cult which became known as Sabbateans and Sabbateanism, which actually is the very inversion of mainstream Judaism.
	This Sabbatean cult, and at one point, and by the way, everything I'm going to say in relation to this Zevi and the cult comes from Jewish sources, because there are people in the Jewish community who absolutely know this is true.
	Not enough, but they absolutely know this is true.
	And so you have this Zevi cult, which inverted everything.
	So, for instance, if in Judaism a particular day was a feast day, Oh, sorry, a fast day.
	Then in Sabbateanism, it would be a feast day.
	Now, you may not think that that's too much of a problem on that level, and it's not.
	But once you get into this whole inversion cult, then lots of other things far more serious start to come up.
	For instance, if it is a taboo for sex with children, And it's a taboo to have an incest with children within families.
	Then under Sabbateanism, it is not only not a taboo, it is encouraged.
	It's part of their culture.
	And what happened with Zevi, he was operating in the Ottoman Empire and he was in what is called Turkey today, the state of Turkey.
	And at the height of this cult, This is again according to Jewish sources.
	He had about a million followers.
	Now just, you know, take that on.
	That's a million followers in the 1600s.
	And eventually the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire said to Zevi, look, either you convert to Islam or you ain't going to be around for very long.
	So he decided to convert to Islam and many of his followers did as well.
	But convert to Islam only on the surface.
	Because they continued to practice their Sabbateanism, their inversion of Judaism, in secret.
	And these people that converted, these Sabbateans that converted on the surface, became known as Donma or Donme, which means to turn, to convert, in other words.
	And this stream operates within the Islam to this day.
	And one major aspect of this stream of Sabbatean cultists who are practicing their cult, their basically satanic cult within Islam, is better known today as the Saudi royal family.
	The British Empire that put the Saudi House of Saud into power because they wanted to hijack the centers of the Islamic religion in Mecca and Medina.
	They worked with the House of Saud, which eventually controlled that whole area.
	But they also introduced to the House of Saud a man called Wahhabi.
	And he was a Sabbatean.
	And from Wahhabi, whose daughter married into the Saudi royal family, we get Wabahism, which is this extreme version of Islam, which is practiced and imposed where?
	In Saudi Arabia.
	This is the head-chopping, hand-chopping version of Of Islam, which manifests as ISIS Islamic State, which is funded by who?
	The House of Saud, among others, including the United States.
	And so another step, the next step in this Sabbatean cult, the next major step, was the arrival in the 18th century of a man called Jacob Frank.
	Jacob Frank claimed to be the reincarnation of Sabbatai Zevi and also the reincarnation of the biblical patriarch Jacob.
	And what happened then, and this is again from Jewish sources, is he took Sabbateanism into still greater depths, both of depravity and of...
	Expansion. Because one of the things that Frank started to do was to convert Sabbateans, and from this time on they were known as Sabbatean Frankists, as they are to this day, Convert them to Roman Catholicism and Christianity.
	So they took over the Vatican, etc.
	And this is the modus operandi of Sabbatean Frankists.
	They infiltrate...
	They infiltrate religions, claiming and outwardly behaving as if they're one of that community and one of that religion while advancing and using that religion community as a means to advance the Sabbatean Frankist agenda, which is total global control.
	And Jacob Frank got together With a guy called Meyer Amstel Rothschild, the founder of the Rothschild dynasty.
	The Rothschilds were called Bauer until Mayor Amstel Rothschild came in or Mayor Amstel Bauer as he was and
	he changed the name to Rothschild and it was named after a
	sign or a symbol on their house in Frankfurt the symbol was the Star of David and
	Rothschild in German actually means red shield or red sign so that's where the very name comes from and that that
	symbol from which Rothschild comes is of course on the flag of Israel, which is
	the fiefdom of the Rothschilds and the fiefdom in terms of its controlling elite of this Sabotean Frankis cult
	Because it was this Death cult that was behind the creation of Israel and what
	they've done is seized control through this infiltration of
	the Jewish community while the vast majority of Jewish people have no idea who these people are and
	and They have been persuaded to
	Go in a certain direction when actually
	It's not for the reasons that they're being told it's not to fulfill biblical prophecy or any of that
	It's to advance this cult And this is why the Rothschilds We're absolutely central, totally central to the creation of Israel.
	For instance, in the latter part of the 19th century, a secret society was created in Britain called the Round Table.
	And its first head was Cecil Rhodes, who plundered Southern Africa for the Rothschilds with the gold and the diamonds.
	And the Roundtable Secret Society was funded by the Rothschilds.
	And at the time of the First World War, we had the Balfour Declaration.
	This was the British Foreign Secretary, Lord Balfour, declaring And, you know, the Balfour Declaration, it would seem that he stood up in Parliament or something and declared that the British Empire supported a homeland for Jewish people in Palestine.
	But actually, the Balfour Declaration was a letter.
	And it was a letter sent by Lord Balfour to...
	Lord Rothschild saying that the British Empire supported this homeland for Jewish people in Palestine.
	That's what history tells you.
	What history doesn't tell you is that Lord Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary, was an inner circle member of this Roundtable Secret Society.
	And the Roundtable Secret Society was funded...
	By the Rothschilds.
	And so it goes on and goes on until Israel was created.
	Now, the vast majority of people in Israel think that Israel and why it was created was about...
	Fulfilling biblical prophecy, like I say, but it wasn't.
	It was to be a point of the center point of control by this Sabbatean Frankist cult.
	And going on to what I said earlier, this is why you would think that Israel, the Israeli government kind of representing Judaism, and the Saudi royal family representing Islam would actually be in great conflict, but they haven't been.
	Under the surface, they have been working as one unit, and this has become more obvious with the arrival of this new crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, who basically runs Saudi Arabia now, Horrific killing of Jamel Khashoggi, the Saudi dissident journalist.
	And so this is why they have been so close when you think they wouldn't be.
	And then I show in the book, in a chapter called Atlantic Crossing, how this cult moved in on America.
	And this cult hides behind the The massive network in America of Zionist organizations and ultra-Zionist organizations which fund American politics to the most extraordinary extent.
	To give people an idea of how few people we're looking at at the core, the Jewish population of the world...
	It's only 0.2% of the human population.
	And depending how you define what a Jewish person is, because there are different definitions, the number is around 16 million in a world population of 7.7 billion.
	And the people in this cult are a tiny fraction of those numbers.
	And through compartmentalization Walling off knowledge and keeping people further down the hierarchy, only having the knowledge they need to make their contribution in ignorance of what they're contributing to ultimately, it takes a very few people to run this.
	And so if you then go into the story of 9-11, both before, during and after, as I have in the trigger, You find that the ultra-Zionist Mossad Israeli military intelligence involvement in 9-11 was absolutely central, far more central than the CIA, which is also controlled in its inner core by this same death cult.
	And the chapters in the second half of the book towards the end, which are just a coincidence question mark, and then just a coincidence two and just a coincidence three, are devastating.
	There's no way you can read those chapters and dismiss the idea that the Israel hierarchy, intelligence and military and political, were not absolutely central to what happened on September the 11th, 2001. Yes, you make a really ironclad case, and that is a great laying of the base that these ideas came from.
	And it is just odd because ancient religions and backward spiritual ideas always seem to be at the heart of things.
	I'm just driven nuts by what really drives these ideas.
	There must be real power there.
	They wouldn't be so dedicated to it because you'd expect billionaires to just say, well, I'm good.
	I don't need your weird religion.
	I'm past all that.
	But it seems so central to everything that drives them.
	The death cult is driven by the belief in basically what Satanists believe in, but they hide that within the Judaistic religion or secular Zionism.
	And much of what we call the Jewish community and Judaism are actually just the The screen they hide behind.
	You know, it's like you've got the Satanists in the Western countries, people like the British Royal Family, for instance, who outwardly are believers in Christianity.
	So, you know, they're always kind of going to church and all that.
	Well, in public they are.
	But actually behind the scenes, they don't follow Christianity at all.
	They follow something very different, Sabbatean Frankism or its equivalent.
	And so you've got this infiltration.
	But what happens, as I mentioned earlier, is that this Sabbatean Frankist death cult has set up out of Israel a phenomenal global web, particularly in the West, Of organizations.
	You have perhaps the best known one in the United States, the Anti-Defamation League, which are there to target anyone That is in any way shape or form even mildly getting close to uncovering what's happening out of Israel.
	And they use the term anti-Semite.
	They've just introduced and this is ultimately the death cult that's behind this.
	They've introduced in the last few years a new definition of anti-Semitism.
	Which is massively expanded from what it should be, which is discrimination against Jewish people for being Jewish people.
	That should be what it's defined as.
	In fact, antisemitism itself is a complete misnomer because Semite, Semitism, refers to a group of languages in the Middle East, the overwhelming vast, vast, vast majority of which are Arabic languages.
	So anti-Semitism is in fact saying anti-Arab.
	This is how the inversion goes into even those levels of deceit.
	But what this new definition does is expand the definition of anti-Semitism to include criticism of Israel.
	In fact, it's so expanded now, Greg, that if you talk of a global conspiracy without mentioning Jewish people in any way shape or form or Zionism in any way shape or form you are called an anti-Semite because they say that the idea that there's a global conspiracy is an anti-Semitic trope and therefore though you're not mentioning Jewish people you're anti-Semitic because you're indicating that that's what you're talking about.
	I mention in the book a researcher into 9-11 Who quite soon after 9-11 just mentioned in an article that many witnesses were saying they heard explosions in the buildings before they fell.
	And he was attacked by the Anti-Defamation League.
	Well, he wasn't saying that there was a Jewish involvement in 9-11 in terms of What he was saying in that article, he was just saying that witnesses, which is absolutely true, say they heard explosions.
	And yet the Anti-Defamation League that's supposed to be there to protect Jewish people from discrimination were in there on his case.
	Now this makes no sense, but it does.
	If you know about the death cult and how it works.
	And one of the amazing things that I detail in the book is the scale of ultra-Zionist funding of American politics, both parties.
	It's just extraordinary.
	And this is why someone like Netanyahu turns up at Capitol Hill and the House of Representatives, or both houses, Are actually on their feet, like every two minutes, giving a standing ovation.
	It's because they are owned by Israel.
	Trump is owned by Israel.
	That's why, from the moment he was elected, Netanyahu started this process of building more and more Jewish-only, by the way, settlements, On Palestinian illegally occupied land.
	Because he knew there was going to be no pushback from the American president.
	And this is why the...
	The American Embassy was moved by Trump from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, which has massive implications, not least for the Palestinians.
	And this death cult, as I point out in the book, has had the ambition all along to remove the big mosque on what Jews and Christians call Temple Mount in Jerusalem.
	And replace it with a rebuilt Solomon's temple.
	Because Solomon is in their death cult mythology, a black magician.
	And, you know, like a godlike figure to this cult.
	And this moving of the embassy.
	Into Jerusalem is a step towards the rebuilding of Solomon's temple.
	And this is why the Israeli government is systematically moving Palestinians out of the area where that mosque is in Jerusalem.
	It's all part of this process.
	And now we've reached the point.
	I've been saying this for so long that this was the goal.
	Now we're seeing the point where those extremists that go public in the Jewish community in Jerusalem are saying, that's what we want.
	We want Solomon's temple back.
	And that's what it's all moving towards.
	And so you've got this network that moved in on America, controls American politics
	through its funding and other sources of manipulation, that long ago infiltrated the National Security
	Agency, the Pentagon, and the CIA, etc., and the institutions of government.
	And they had, in the run-up to 9-11, control of every area, as I show in the book, that
	they needed to control to carry it out and then to cover it up.
	Thank you.
	Hmm. Yes, yes.
	The level of detail is staggering, and it does seem like this is a metaphysical or spiritual conquest as much as it is anything.
	Inversion and infiltration are clearly effective tools to keep the target moving and the researchers guessing.
	And So, Jacob Frank died in 1791.
	Obviously, we have to fast forward quite a bit to get up to 9-11, 2001, but where do we see the tentacles of the death cult in the Bush administration, in the strategizing and planning of 9-11 itself?
	Are there particular people we can put in this club?
	Well, let me give you a sequence.
	This won't be short, but it will be fascinating and devastating if people have not heard it before, and most people will not have done.
	You can take this back a long time, but let's pick up the sequence in 1979.
	In 1979, a guy called Issa Harrell, who was known as the father of Israeli intelligence, gave an interview to an American journalist and predicted that Arab terrorists were going to attack New York's biggest building.
	In the same 1979, Benjamin Netanyahu began to organize international terrorism conferences.
	First one was in Jerusalem in 1979.
	The second one was in the United States in 1984, in which he was calling for a war on terror.
	And for preemptive strikes on terror states, as he called them.
	And he put all this in a book called War on Terrorism or Terrorism, How the West Can Win.
	And then in 1996, when Netanyahu was Prime Minister of Israel, he ordered a study, a report, headed by a guy called Richard Perle.
	This report was called A Clean Break, A New Strategy for Securing the Realm, securing the realm being Israel.
	And Richard Pearl, of course, was very much involved in American politics and had a very significant role in the Pentagon at the time of 9-11.
	In this Clean Break document, He called for an invasion of Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein and to create circumstances in which there was inter-Arab conflict.
	The document said it would be good to have every kind of inter-Arab conflict for the benefit of Israel.
	He mentioned Syria, he mentioned Iran, and so on.
	Then a year later, after this document was produced for Netanyahu, Richard Pearl, same man, And another group of ultra-Zionists in the United States created an organization called the Project for the New American Century.
	This was co-founded by two ultra-Zionists called Bill Kristol and Robert Kagan.
	And in this organization were Dick Cheney, who would be the de facto president on 9-11.
	Donald Rumsfeld, who would be the defence secretary on 9-11, Paul Wolfowitz, who would be his deputy, a big ultra-Zionist Wolfowitz, and an ultra-Zionist called Dov Zakheim, who would be the comptroller at the time of 9-11 of the Pentagon, in charge of the entire Pentagon budget.
	Also there was Richard Pearl in that organisation, Clean Break Pearl, and also people like John Bolton, Right up to recently, when he was fired by Trump, has been pushing for attacks on countries like Iran.
	In 1998, this same group of people He wrote to the then President Bill Clinton and demanded that Saddam Hussein be removed as leader of Iraq because of weapons of mass destruction.
	Remember that's 1998.
	Then in 2000, the September 2000, this organization produced a document and it called for regime changes using American forces in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Iran, North Korea, China, leading to regime change in China and some other countries.
	And the document said that American forces...
	Should fight and decisively win multiple simultaneous major theatre wars.
	And they said that this process of transformation, this series of regime changes that I've just described, would be slow unless America had a new Pearl Harbour, To justify the massive increases in military spending and to justify the attacks on these countries.
	And the documents wording said this.
	The process of transformation, this regime change list, is likely to be a long one absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbour.
	Twelve months to the month after that document was published, and nine months after the people that wrote it came to power with Bush, America had what Bush called at the time the Pearl Harbor of the 21st century, 9-11.
	Then in 2007...
	General Wesley Clark, former Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, told a television show called Democracy Now!, an alternative television show, that days after 9-11, he went to the Pentagon, he met Rumsfeld, he met Wolfowitz, and then he went downstairs and met a general friend of his on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the uniform level of Command in the Pentagon.
	And he said this general said to him, we're going to invade Iraq.
	Now, remember, this is days after 9-11.
	And Clark said, I said to him, what are we going to invade Iraq for?
	Is there a connection to 9-11?
	General said, not that we know of, but we're going to invade Iraq, come down from upstairs.
	So Clark says he goes away and he comes back some weeks later, by which time the United States military is in Afghanistan.
	And he sees the same general.
	And he says to the general, why aren't we invaded Iraq?
	Thought we were going to invade Iraq. And the general said to him, well, it's worse than that, sir.
	He said, we've just had this from upstairs, Rumfeld's office.
	We're going to attack seven countries in five years.
	And he listed the countries.
	And they were all the countries listed by the Project for the New American Century in September 2000.
	Then you have the New York Times...
	Reporting just after 9-11 that the Pentagon Policy Board, which was full of these same people, had met on September 19th and 20th, 2001, to plot the removal of Saddam Hussein.
	And yet we were told that The decision to remove Saddam Hussein was taken much later and that could have been called off right up to the invasion in 2003 had Saddam got rid of weapons of mass destruction, which he actually didn't have.
	And one other thing in this sequence too, immediately after 9-11, immediately after the attacks, I mean on the morning of the attack, straight after them, A man called Ehud Barak, who had been Prime Minister of Israel right up to the early months of 2001 and was a former head of Israeli military intelligence, went on the BBC. I emphasize this is immediately after the attacks when other people are running around saying, what happened?
	What happened? Who did it?
	And he told the BBC that basically the likely culprit was Osama bin Laden and there was a need to invade Afghanistan, which of course is exactly what happened.
	And when you look at the invasion of Afghanistan, there's no way that that wasn't orchestrated and ready given the time involved before 9-11 happened, just as The Patriot Act, which was introduced deleting basic freedoms in America, justified by the 9-11 attacks, was clearly written before the attacks, given how quickly it came out.
	And the man who wrote that, a man called Michael Shertoff, an ultra, ultra-Zionist, Was the head of the criminal division of the Justice Department who headed the entire criminal investigation into 9-11, actually non-investigation.
	Then you have the 9-11 Commission, which was, if you remember, you've just had these extraordinarily horrific attacks on the United States, and yet Bush and Cheney were doing everything they could not to have an official investigation into it.
	And when public opinion pressed them on this and forced them to have an inquiry, the first head they offered was Henry Kissinger, who has been an operative in this Sabbateen Frankist cult all his adult life.
	And when, you know, the public, to say the least, did not find that credible and demanded that Kissinger reveal his clients in his notorious Kissinger associates operation, he stood down because to, you know, reveal his clients would have opened a can of worms that would have, you know, the lid would have not landed till it reached Mars.
	If the truth about the people he was involved in came out.
	And then plan B of Bush Cheney, i.e.
	Cheney and those who control Cheney, Bush was just what he's told.
	Plan B was to put a guy in charge called Thomas Keene as chairman, a man who later said that the 9-11 Commission had been set up to fail, and to put into place the man who really ran the entire show, As executive director, and that was a guy called Philip Zelikow, an ultra, ultra Zionist.
	And on top of this, you know, as I've been talking about this, and people have been reading the book, you know, people that have followed this might know what I'm about to say, but the vast, vast, overwhelming majority will not know that in the year 2001, 200 Israelis, mostly posing as art students, were arrested on suspicion of running a spy ring across America.
	And this spy ring, there was 140 were arrested before 9-11 and 60 afterwards.
	And what appears to have been the center of this spy ring Was in Florida at a place called Hollywood.
	It just happened to be that that was a major center of operation for the many of the 19 alleged hijackers on 9-11, including Mohammed Attar.
	You know, they were even in streets next to each other, some of them.
	These Israeli people in the spy ring and people like Attar.
	And another central center point for this spy ring was New Jersey, which was another center of operation for these alleged hijackers.
	And talking of New Jersey, on the morning of 9-11, a lady looked out of her window from an apartment block and saw what she said were five men of Middle Eastern appearance, This is why at the time when only the first tower, the North Tower, was burning and they were filming it and they were whooping and high-fiving and laughing in celebration.
	And as a result of that, they became known as the Dancing Israelis.
	And two of them turned out to be known Mossad operatives.
	And the lady reported them to the police, and the police got the FBI involved, and they were arrested.
	And they were kept for 71 days until the ultra-Zionist Michael Shertoff, in charge of the whole criminal investigation, Let them go, as he let go all those who were being questioned for being part of this Israeli spy ring.
	And as I show in the book, many of these people arrested and questioned in this spy ring were military and military intelligence operatives from Israel, some of them with expertise in explosives.
	And computers, which was fundamentally part of how 9-11 was pulled off, as I show in the book.
	After 9-11, Shertoff could block the criminal investigation.
	But they had a problem with the families, the loved ones of those who died on 9-11, because they might want their day in court.
	So to avoid this, what happened was they set up this compensation fund.
	To give money to the loved ones of the victims of 9-11 on the agreement to receive the money that they would not take civil action and thus have their day in court.
	Well, the man who oversaw that victim compensation fund was an ultra-Zionist lawyer called Kenneth Feinberg.
	And Feinberg actually was also the special master for executive compensation who decided who got bailout money after the Financial crash of 2008.
	By the way, taxpayer bail out money.
	Now, the problem they had then was that nearly 100 families who'd lost loved ones on 9-11, they refused to take the compensation and they wanted their day in court.
	They wanted civil litigation.
	They wanted to have in court what actually happened and have the evidence shown.
	And the man who was put in charge of the civil litigation was an ultra-Zionist judge called Judge Alvin Hellestein, who even according to the mainstream media ran a, quote, war of attrition against the families to stop any of them getting to court.
	And the last...
	Family to give up was in 2011 when the New York Times reported that a decision by Hellerstein in relation to the case had just made it impossible for the family to continue and the last family stopped their litigation so none of it got to court.
	Then you take into account that the The rubble and the debris from the Twin Towers and also Building 7, the third building to fall on 9-11, at 5.20 in the afternoon, which was not hit by a plane, that had enormous potential, fundamental potential, for experts to go in and see the evidence of what brought the towers down.
	Instead of that, under, again, the overall control of Michael Shurtoff, that rubble and debris and steel, what was left of it, was taken by an ultra-Zionist company to New Jersey scrapyards.
	The New Jersey scrapyards were owned by ultra-Zionists.
	And it was then cut up immediately and put on boats to Asia to be smelted.
	And in the book I quote an extraordinary report by the New York Times of...
	The scene at these scrapyards when experts in engineering, in all the skills you need to establish what actually brought the towers down, that they were at the scrapyards and the grabbers were coming down.
	And were grabbing the steel, the debris, and moving it as they were preparing it for shipment.
	And the New York Times article describes how these experts were running into the rubble and the piles of debris when the digger moved away.
	Desperately looking for anything that would be useful in establishing how the buildings came down.
	And then, as the grabber came back, basically running for their life away from the rubble so they didn't get hit by it.
	Now, if you can describe a scene more absolutely contemptuous...
	Of those who died on 9-11 and their loved ones left behind, then I'd really like to hear it, because I can't think of one.
	And then you look at the company that was running the security at Boston Logan Airport and at Newark, New Jersey, and it was a subsidiary of a company called ICTS, That was set up and run by Israeli Mossad and domestic intelligence Shin Bet agents that was overseeing the security at those airports.
	What's more, in 1987, a company that was run again by Mossad and military intelligence agents from Israel...
	It's called Atwell Security.
	And it was bidding for the contract to take over the security of the Twin Towers.
	And Atwell was a subsidiary.
	Of a company run by a guy called Shawl Eisenberg, who was a long, long operative in Germany.
	Covert operations with Israeli Mossad and Israeli military and military intelligence.
	They got the contract from the ultra-Zionist controlled New York Port Authority to take control of the security at the Twin Towers.
	But they lost the contract when it was revealed that the head of the company was actually a...
	A former intelligence operative in Israel who had a very dodgy background in terms of some of the things he did while being a central figure in Israeli intelligence.
	But then, after the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, The ultra-Zionists still, and right the way through to 9-11 and beyond, controlled New York Port Authority, decided that they were going to revamp the security at the World Trade Center as a result of that bombing.
	And they gave the contract to an ultra-Zionist company called Kroll Inc., which was...
	Running the security right from then and across 9-11.
	Also in 1983, an ultra-Zionist called Morris Greenberg, who ran this insurance giant AIG, he bought into Kroll Inc.
	in 1993 and became a partner.
	And this is the same Morris Greenberg Who secured the insurance for Larry Silverstein, the ultra-Zionist who bought the lease on the World Trade Center just before 9-11, weeks before, and increased the security in the case of a terrorist attack on those towers.
	And Maurice Greenberg...
	Sorted out the terrorist insurance for Silverstein, but then sold it on, reinsured it, with 24 other companies who actually took the hit and not Greenberg.
	And Silverstein ended up, and a guy called Frank Lowy was involved as well, the guy of Westfield Moles.
	Silverstein, his...
	Personal investment into buying the lease and the first down payments on the lease of the Twin Towers was $14 million.
	His insurance payout as a result of the attacks was $4.56.
	It also turns out that Silverstein was a close friend of Benjamin Netanyahu.
	They used to talk on the phone every Sunday.
	This has come from sources like the Heretz newspaper in Israel.
	Wherever you look, Greg, and I'm only even now scanning the surface, wherever you look, it is impossible not to see that this Ultra-Zionist network, which I say is ultimately controlled by this death cult, it's impossible to deny that they were not centrally involved in the attacks of 9-11.
	And as a result of the 9-11, they got all the things that they wanted in terms of American involvement in the Middle East and all the wars and regime changes that have followed.
	Right, right.
	Man, that is quite a breakdown.
	There are so many moving parts.
	You're really great at laying them out clearly.
	And as you say, we can see how these philosophically aligned people are in every key position.
	It's very suspicious.
	And when it comes to the destruction of the Twin Towers themselves, we know it wasn't planes.
	We know it wasn't jet fuel.
	And honestly, even professional demolition doesn't explain the lack of seismic data from the impact or the odds Well, I mean, the classic, the obvious controlled demolition was
	building seven, building seven, also known as the Solomon building.
	Like I said earlier, it was not hit by a plane.
	And it was a 47 story steel frame building.
	And we're told it was brought down.
	And this is the official story.
	I know it's staggering.
	But the official story of 9-11 is staggering.
	We're told that a 47 story steel frame building fell because of an office furnishings fire.
	That's the official story.
	At making building seven, the only steel frame building in the history of architecture and
	engineering before or since to bring, to be brought down by fire.
	And it's the most obvious controlled demolition.
	If you go on YouTube and put in Building 7 Collapse, you'll see it's obviously controlled demolition.
	In fact, Larry Silverstein told us it was, because he was interviewed on PBS in a documentary about 9-11, and he said that on that afternoon, he was approached by the fire commander, as he called it, And told that they were struggling to contain the fire in Building 7.
	And they decided, said Silverstein, that, you know, there's been such a loss of life today.
	Let's just pull it. Let's just pull the building.
	Which, of course, means... Demolish it.
	Well, there's a few things to that.
	First of all, this fire commander has never ever come forward and said, yes, I had that conversation.
	So he's a mystery man for a start.
	And secondly, you don't bring down a building.
	A, the fire department doesn't bring down a building.
	Controlled demolition experts do.
	And secondly, that they have to spend weeks in a building of that size, putting the charges in the right places to make it fall on its own footprint and not topple over, which is exactly what Building 7 did.
	And then, you know, I was writing this in my first book on 9-11 called Alice in Wonderland of the World Trade Center Disaster.
	It came out in 2002.
	But in the run-up to this year's 9-11, just a few weeks ago, The University of Alaska Fairbanks produced the report that has taken it four years to compile into whether fire brought down the building, which is what the The government claim.
	And their report, after four years, said, no way, no way that fire brought down Building 7.
	Now, the 9-11 Commission and the ultra-Zionist guy running it, Philip Zelikow, they had a big problem with Building 7 because, you know, they couldn't really put in the official report, which many, many people would read, That it was brought down by an office furnishings fire.
	I mean, you can reveal that at a press conference and it's reported a bit and then forgotten.
	But you don't really want that in a 9-11 Commission report that's going to stand the test of time and it's going to be referred to ongoing because it's so ludicrous.
	So the way Zellico got around it is that although three buildings fell on 9-11, The 9-11 Commission Report only mentions two of them.
	The Twin Towers.
	It doesn't mention Building 7 because it couldn't explain the collapse without controlled demolition.
	And then you've got the Twin Towers, like you say, and these are 110-story buildings.
	No way in the world they were brought down by what we were told, which was a fire from the planes.
	And, you know, I mentioned a tape...
	Of fire officers, firefighters that was not revealed for a year after 9-11.
	That was communications by fire officers right up in one of the towers at the seat of the fire.
	Right there.
	And in this tape, because before this tape came out, the official story was that firefighters didn't get anywhere near that level.
	And in this tape, the fire officer is talking about basically small pockets of fire that have to be dealt with.
	But there was no raging inferno.
	Other witnesses that survived and saw that said there was no raging inferno.
	Because if you look at the South Tower, especially, and that Scene that no one will ever forget of the plane hitting the tower on live television and the massive explosion.
	Well, that massive explosion was the fuel burning off outside the building, most of it.
	And therefore, there wasn't that much fuel to burn off in the building itself.
	And when again you see the buildings come down, what we're told is that the buildings came down because the top started to fall, and it pancaked down, putting more and more pressure on the floors below, and that's how it collapsed.
	Well, okay, so explain to me why the towers fell in free fall speed.
	The speed it would take to take, say, a billiard ball 110 floors up and just drop it.
	And the towers fell in basically the same speed that it would take that billiard ball untouched to hit the ground.
	Right. No resistance.
	No resistance. And when you look at the towers...
	Coming down, you see that the floors below are not there by the time the floors above or the debris above comes down.
	And so you can see why they came down in free fall speed because the resistance was being removed before that which would be resisted actually reached that point.
	Now, that only happens with controlled demolitions.
	Now, as you say, you could...
	Explain this with literally the usual form of controlled demolition, which is charges in the right places.
	And as building demolition experts have said, you wouldn't need that many.
	You just need them on the right places for the building to fall.
	But there are...
	Some detailed explanations, not least by a lady called Dr.
	Judy Wood, that suggest that actually what brought the towers down was some form of directed energy weapon.
	Now, interestingly, in my first book in 2002, Alice in Wonderland, I do have a section asking that question and pointing out the fact that That would absolutely turn those buildings to dust, which is what we saw.
	Because basically what these directed energy weapons do is deconstruct the structure of matter.
	It basically just makes it disintegrate.
	And if you look at the towers when they fell, it was like a fountain, if you look at it.
	It was like a fountain coming out from the top and going out.
	A fountain of dust as they fell.
	It was an extraordinary thing to look at.
	And so I think there's a very, very good case that directed energy weapons could have been absolutely involved in the towers coming down.
	Right. It's really hard to identify a technology we haven't seen used, but so often there's a strange physics that's left out of the mainstream, odd technologies, and they seem to coincide with the people who have these occult beliefs.
	Yeah, this is the point, Greg.
	I've been making this point for nearly 30 years.
	The cutting edge of technology that we see in the public arena is not the cutting edge of technology that is available to those in the shadows and those in the inner core of the military.
	And it's one of the things I've said in the book, to understand what...
	Technology they had at the time of 2001, you have to look at the technology that's emerged in the public arena many, many, many years afterwards.
	And now, of course, directed energy weaponry is coming into the mainstream, that that's what the military have, not just in America, but in places like Russia and China as well.
	And so you have this...
	You have this technology, which if you use it and the public do not know that you have it or it actually exists, then they're going to dismiss any suggestion from someone who's saying this is how it was done because they're going to think it was impossible.
	Well, it may have been with the technology publicly available in 2001, but certainly not behind the scenes.
	This technology has been known for a very long time.
	And like you say, Nikola Tesla, who died in a New York hotel room in 1943, had developed this technology well before he died that could disintegrate matter.
	He talked about being able to cut the earth in half with this technology.
	So it's absolutely existed.
	And by the way, when Tesla died in that hotel room in 1943, there was a raid by the feds that took away much of his material.
	And it was looked at by the authorities, by the feds.
	And the...
	The John in Donald J. Trump refers to an uncle who was the man who looked through those Tesla papers and those Tesla documents laying out this sort of technology.
	Right. Crazy, right?
	Yeah. Man, and...
	I guess on the subject of Trump, you mentioned that Trump was selected by this death cult.
	Well, are there other big members of this death cult working today?
	Have they got agents in the current administration beyond just the puppet president?
	I would assume so. Oh, absolutely.
	He's surrounded by them.
	And I'm not saying that Donald Trump is necessarily an active member of this cult.
	See, the people that are brought to power as presidents and prime ministers At best are the small fry of the cult and often are not in the cult at all.
	They're just, you know, gophers.
	They're just puppets.
	And so the reason they wanted Trump, and I was saying this not being wise after the event, I was saying this during the election campaign in 2016, that Trump is not there by accident, being a maverick.
	Who wants to drain the swamp?
	He's actually being brought through.
	You see, when you look at the documents and the emails that came out through WikiLeaks showing that the DNC, the Democratic National Committee, manipulated events to stop Bernie Sanders winning the nomination to take on Trump in favour of the person they wanted, Hillary Clinton. And therefore they made sure that Sanders couldn't win.
	When you see that, are we really saying that when Trump starts out in the Republican nomination process with, what was it, 16 people, something like that to start with, that he couldn't be stopped by the Republican Party hierarchy if that's what they really wanted?
	But he somehow ends up winning the nomination.
	Because he was the chosen one.
	And they wanted to bring him to power for a number of reasons.
	Now, Hillary Clinton would have been certainly acceptable to them, by the way.
	But ideally, they wanted Trump because of the next stage of this takeover of America.
	They wanted him for two major reasons.
	One, he is an absolute Israel phobe.
	And, you know, he's surrounded by ultra-Zionists in his administration.
	And as he was in the Trump, you know, his company, the Trump operation.
	In fact, some of the people are the same, like Greenblatt and David Friedman, who's the American ambassador to Israel, actually the Israel ambassador to America, if the truth be told.
	And so that was good.
	And from day one, he did as they wanted him to do, which is all the things he's done for Israel ever since.
	But they also wanted him to be a figure of hatred that would divide America, because they wanted a civil war in America, verbal and eventually violent.
	And what we're looking at, Greg, is the development in America of Marxism.
	As I mention in the book, Karl Marx was an asset of this Sabbatean-Frankist cult.
	Karl Marx was a Jewish man who converted to another religion, exactly in line with what Sabbatean-Frankists do.
	And you see, you've got two ways of the few controlling the many.
	You've got capitalism, which means you control the many by centralizing control of money, which means you control choice, which means you control freedom of anyone that doesn't have it, or as much as you do.
	And that's what we call the 1%.
	And that's one way for the few to seize power over the rest.
	But there's another way, which is to build a structure of governmental hierarchical control, which we call Marxism, Communism.
	The Don't Scare the Children version is called Socialism.
	And that creates a structure in which the few sit at the top, as in Soviet Union, for instance, as in China today.
	So either way, capitalism or Marxism, the few are controlling the many.
	But Marxism is actually the more efficient way because the very hierarchy gives you power over everyone else.
	The trick, the mind trick, because it's all a psychological trick, is to paint Marxism, communism, socialism as government of the people.
	And so what you've got in America is Is the development of Marxism, which is being presented as a government of the people.
	And this is the mentality that's taken over the Democratic Party.
	Completely. You take Biden out of the Democratic list of candidates, you take Tulsi Gabbard out, and what you're left with are representatives of this Marxist philosophy.
	Even if they don't believe in it, that's what they're pushing.
	Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her Green New Deal Which is being introduced to save the world from the hoax of climate change caused by human activity, is a Marxist manifesto.
	And so, if you look at the techniques of Marxism, and there was a guy operated out of Chicago called Saul Alinsky, who was a, quote, community organizer, ultra-Zionist. And of course, out of the same Chicago and another community organizer was Barack Obama.
	Accident? No chance.
	People like Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi were followers of Alinsky.
	And he wrote a book detailing the techniques of Marxism, basically, whereby you...
	The techniques to transform a society.
	And what he says in the book is you don't target faceless bureaucracy.
	You don't target corporations.
	You pick a person, a personality, and you focus everything that's wrong that you want to change on that one person.
	And so by doing that, You unite on your side lots of people who may have disagreements, but unite them behind the hatred of the target figure.
	And you see this in one form in George Orwell's 1984, where they have this guy, Emmanuel Goldstein, who Big Brother says everyone must hate because he's the enemy of the people.
	And so what they've done with Trump is they've created him as Emmanuel Goldstein, the man that the opposition hate, that personifies everything.
	And then on Trump's side...
	You've got people supporting Trump who basically see the other side in the same black and white terms.
	And so you have this division, very clear division in America now between those who love Trump and those who hate Trump, which is basically what politics in America has become.
	Do you love Trump or hate Trump?
	And so the...
	The situation with Trump was that when they put these puppets into position, they'll pick them on the basis of They have many things about them and in their own opinions that the cult wants to happen in the period that they're in office.
	But with most of them who are not 100% knowing members of this cult, these puppets will have other instincts and other opinions that are not in line with the agenda.
	And it was very clear to me anyway during...
	The election campaign that Trump did not genuinely see the point of antagonism and conflict with Russia.
	But what this cult wants is a conflict between the West and Russia, China and Iran and any other allies of Russia, China.
	That's where they're trying to lead it.
	And therefore they didn't want any rapport with Russia.
	So the moment that Trump got elected, the Russiagate thing started.
	And what happened?
	Trump was not going to get any closer to Putin and Russia because people would say, look, he's Putin's puppet.
	Look, they're getting closer, you know, in public.
	So they achieved that end.
	And, you know...
	Trump imposed sanctions on Russia that no other president has ever done.
	And so, overwhelmingly, however, Trump is doing the job that they want.
	What I found interesting was a bit of pushback from Trump over Iran and the sacking of Iran.
	John Bolton, Project for the New American Century, who was pushing for an attack on Iran.
	You'll remember a few weeks ago, it was revealed that planes were actually virtually in the air, if not in the air, to attack Iran before Trump pulled them back.
	And one of the reasons that Trump pulled them back, I suggest, was actually a television program.
	Tucker Carlson Tonight, I watched that very program.
	And it was just as this attack was about to happen.
	And of course, Trump's always watching the television, not least Fox News.
	And I remember Tucker Carlson was pointing out that if Trump does attack Iran, he's got no chance of winning the next election.
	Because, of course, lots of people supported Trump because in the election campaign, he's saying...
	We've got to put an end to these regime change wars.
	So if he'd have attacked Iran, and there's enormous pressure on him still to do so, by the way, then he would have lost a lot of support.
	And I think that was very influential in the very late decision to withdraw the early decision to go ahead.
	Maybe that's why they're coming at them with impeachment now.
	It's like, come on, man, do what we say.
	Well, this is the next thing you see.
	You know, Russiagate was obviously going to go nowhere.
	I wrote that in a book in 2016 that this Russiagate was an absolute hoax.
	And that's died down because of the Mueller report.
	Couldn't find any evidence. Of course, Robert Mueller, let's not forget, was the head of the FBI, appointed just two weeks before 9-11, who, under Michael Shertoff, oversaw the non-investigation of 9-11.
	Let us not forget that.
	So now they've come out with another one.
	And this guy, Adam Schiff, ultra-Zionist, see, what they've got...
	Greg, is they control both sides and thus they control the game.
	So you've got the ultra-Zionists in the Democratic Party who are pushing against Trump.
	You've got the ultra-Zionists in the Republican Party and the Trump administration who are pushing for Trump, at least on the surface.
	And so you've got basically people answering to the same masters, controlling both sides.
	And this is most obvious with the...
	The funding, the massive funding of so-called progressive politics is actually regressive.
	They call it liberal.
	The last thing is liberal.
	I'm a liberal in the...
	Dictionary sense of the word in that I'm for maximum freedom, maximum freedom of speech, maximum freedom of lifestyle, maximum freedom of choice.
	I have a simple philosophy on life.
	Do what you like so long as you don't impose it on anyone else.
	That's liberalism.
	But that's not what we've got.
	Progressive-ism is not liberalism.
	It's totalitarianism hidden behind the fake liberal facade.
	And so you've got this...
	Billionaire George Soros funding the left, or what claims to be the left.
	I say it's not for reasons I've explained there.
	And you've got Sheldon Adelson, another ultra-Zionist, who is funding Trump, biggest funder of Trump, and the Republican Party.
	So they control both sides.
	They control the game. And people like Trump and these Democratic would-be's I just pawns in a game.
	The one that stands out in the Democratic Party who's not pushing this agenda is Tulsi Gabbard.
	And what happens?
	They try to get her off the stage.
	They've done it once.
	I think she's back on the next debate, but they try to get it once.
	The DNC again, trying to crush a candidate.
	It's desperate not to get into office.
	Because if Gabbard went against Trump, she would win, I would say.
	But if it was left to an open election of the people, I think she would win when what Gabbard is saying really got out among the people.
	And she, interestingly, is the one Democrat who has come out and said...
	This impeachment thing, or there are others, but the one candidate who's come out and said this impeachment thing on Trump over Ukraine is ridiculous and it's going to damage the Democratic Party and it's going to damage the country.
	And, you know, I'm not saying I agree with everything that Tulsi Gabbard says at all.
	What I'm saying is, and I don't, you know, say vote for this person, vote for that person.
	That's not the role of the media in my view.
	But what she's saying about The ending, this nonsense of overseas wars and regime changes, she is absolutely genuine about, not least because she's experienced it personally.
	And you mentioned the Green New Deal a bit ago, and I did want to ask you about climate change, because you speak on this so well, and of course we know they use problem-reaction-solution, and when it comes to this Aggressive push that climate change is man-made, the catalyst for it, the reason for it, is...
	As you've put it before that they want to have centralized power over every minute detail of your life and Lifestyles and they're gonna say it's to save the planet We saw one example of this in California where people are getting fined or ticketed because they've watered their garden I mean, that's just one example, but how bad can this get?
	Do you see it getting? Well, this is the whole point, you know when I was saying Decades ago now in the books and talks that human-caused climate change was a hoax, people, understandably, it was a very reasonable question, would ask the question, well, why would they want to hoax that?
	And I said at the time, because they want to justify the centralization of power, Marxism, and the control of the fine detail of our lives, justified by we must save the planet.
	And that's exactly what is unfolding.
	That's what the Green New Deal is about.
	We have an organisation in Britain called Extinction Rebellion that has been shutting the streets of London protesting against climate change.
	Their agenda for what they demand must happen is basically a Green New Deal.
	And that's what you're looking at.
	You're looking at a hoax To justify the centralization of power and over absolutely the fine detail of people's lives.
	You've given a very good example, but I mean, the fine detail.
	And they've introduced this lady, Greta Thunberg, this 16 year old, as a front for it.
	What they're doing to that girl is child abuse, in my view.
	And They're talking about a 16-year-old has done this and is behind these global school children's strikes over climate change.
	She's not. She's not.
	It's being orchestrated by adults with a very dark agenda.
	She's just the puppet.
	And, you know, if you look into the background of Greta Thunberg, then you start hitting people like George Soros and Bill Gates and foundations that they fund.
	It's the usual suspects.
	Uh, and, uh, you know, I've got, um, you know, she keeps saying, uh, Greta Thunberg, um, you know, look at the science, you know, the science is settled, been settled for 30 years.
	It's not even nearly settled.
	In fact, with every passing year, the claims start to more and more unravel.
	But one thing you'll notice, Greg, is that when she's interviewed, um, In these softball interviews, she's never asked, okay, so what is the science?
	Tell us the science that we must believe in.
	Because if they did, she would not know where her next word is coming from.
	And they've picked this 16-year-old because you don't...
	Interview, hardball interview, 16-year-olds, how could you interview a girl like that?
	Well, hold on a minute.
	If she's being the front person for millions of kids going on strike over climate change that's not being caused by humans, and you're seeing interviews now with crying young children in...
	Deep anxiety that they think the world's going to end.
	You've got unbelievably ridiculous people like Ocasio-Cortez saying the world will end in 12 years.
	And the whole thing that's going on with Greta Thunberg as the front person...
	Then you have to question her.
	You don't have to be aggressive, but she has to be asked the questions to justify what she's saying and demanding.
	Then you ask, how does a girl from Sweden, a 16-year-old, end up addressing the Davos situation?
	World Forum Summit, World Economic Forum Summit, of the richest, most influential people in the world.
	How does she end up addressing the UN? How does she end up meeting the Pope?
	How does all this happen?
	Because it's being orchestrated.
	And because it's being orchestrated and because of what is happening as a result of what she's doing or being told to do...
	She ought to be questioned to justify what she's saying.
	But this is what they won't do because those behind her know what will happen if they do.
	And one good thing about her address to the UN is that it was so over the top that even some politicians have started to push back on her now in places like France and Germany and others.
	Started to push back because basically...
	There was something so sinister, I would use that word, about that address that a lot of people are now beginning to say, what's going on here?
	I've got in front of me here a series of books when she talks about the science.
	One's by a guy called Dr.
	Tim Ball. Who's very much into the whole climate change science.
	And this book is called Human Caused Global Warming, The Biggest Deception in History.
	There's another book here by a polar bear expert called Dr.
	Susan Crockford. And this book is called The Polar Bear Catastrophe That Never Happened.
	Another book called The Climate Chronicles by a meteorologist in America called Joe Bastardi, who, by his own admission, is a complete weather nerd and has been since he was a kid and is always poring over climate records, you know, and he's gone back.
	and looked at the weather events that are now being blamed on human-caused global warming and he's shown in this book that they were happening decades and decades and decades ago in just the same way and all these things about increases in hurricanes, increases in Tornadoes, increases in all these things are simply not true.
	And the climate record shows it.
	Fewer people by far are dying from climate events than ever before.
	And then there's another book by a guy called Mark Morano who looks at the political manipulation behind this.
	A book called The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change, who explains how the whole thing has been pulled off.
	So there's some science, Greta, which you will not know anything about because it will be kept from you.
	Right, right. Well said.
	Those are great resources.
	And to try to fit one more...
	Kind of a curveball question in here just to have you talk about something that, for people who listen, maybe haven't heard you talk about before.
	But you were mentioning these Democratic candidates.
	Of course, Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Cortez, all compromised.
	I am interested in this Andrew Yang guy.
	Of course, universal basic income, there's an argument that it bolsters centralized power and dependence on the system.
	But with his freedom dividend, he's talking about getting money from the tech companies, from Google, Facebook, Amazon.
	Uber and giving it back to the people.
	And I think that's an interesting idea because these are the kind of titans driving us into the digital dystopia.
	Maybe we should get a little something back, but I'm curious your thoughts on those ideas and just those ideas, I guess.
	Well, I'm not a right-wing, rabid capitalist.
	I believe in social justice.
	I believe in equality of opportunity for everybody, irrespective of colour, sexuality, culture, religion, any of it.
	That's where I'm coming from.
	But the emphasis there is on equality of opportunity.
	What Marxism wants is equality of outcome.
	And equality of outcome is a race to the bottom.
	It destroys human creativity.
	So there is a difference.
	I want equality of opportunity for everybody.
	So everyone's got the best chance and then they use their own initiative and drive and creativity to take it from there.
	And that's, you know, encouraging people to use their skills and their creativity and their drive and not suppressing it and saying everyone must be the same, which is what Marxism and this overwhelmingly Marxist democratic wing I mean, you know, the whole Democratic Party is not like this, but it's that Marxist wing that is driving the party now.
	And in terms of universal basic income, now, Yang may be a lovely guy.
	I don't know him. He may be a lovely guy and what he may be saying is genuine.
	And you can make an argument for that.
	In fact, given the fact that jobs on a monumental scale are going to be taken over by AI and technology, On an extraordinary scale, like I say, in the next few years and decades, some form of income has to be sorted out.
	But we also have to be streetwise.
	And this is why it's so important that people understand the agenda, understand the forces behind it, and understand how it works.
	So, you can look at...
	Let's take a microphone, a radio microphone, or a camera, or a notebook for a journalist.
	Those things are neutral.
	They can be used for good or ill.
	It's how you use them.
	They are not in and of themselves negative or evil.
	And it's the same with a universal basic income.
	I think it would be great, and I would certainly feel better about the world if everyone had a level of income that meant that no one went hungry, no one had to sleep in the streets.
	I think that would be a good thing, as long as initiative to go beyond that was available.
	Right. But universal basic income can also be, and I say that's what the agenda of the cult is, and I'm not saying this is Yang's agenda, I'm saying the agenda of the cult, that's what the agenda is planned to introduce for this reason.
	When the jobs have gone, or most jobs have gone, and there's no other form of earning a living, Then you are surviving on the basic income.
	Now, first of all, that ain't going to be a lot of money, and therefore you're going to live quite a low level of life in terms of financial life.
	And secondly, it opens up the way, and this is what the agenda is, to say, yeah, okay, you can get the basic income, but only if you do what you're told.
	If you stand out of line and challenge the government and criticize the government, you're not going to get a basic income then.
	Only if you toe the line are you going to get the basic income.
	And then if you say, well, I want my freedom so you can stick your basic income.
	And then they'll say to you, well, how are you going to put food on the table then?
	Now, how are you going to do that?
	And so, you know, these things, there's nothing easier to manipulate, Greg, than genuineness that isn't streetwise.
	And this is why it's so important that people find out about the forces that are really running the world and to what end, and their methods of psychological manipulation, because then they'll have the streetwise knowledge to pick out the traps.
	And universal basic income is a trap.
	If the world was run by genuine, open-hearted, loving people, then universal basic income would be a good thing.
	But it's currently run by psychopaths.
	Right, right.
	And psychopaths are not interested in you having basic income so that you have food on the table.
	They're interested in you having basic income so they have the means to control everybody.
	Mm-hmm. Yeah.
	Implement anything you want with good intentions.
	But if you have this overarching control cult running things, they're going to twist any tool for their purposes.
	And it does seem like there's an element where it's a psychological trick to get people to accept a new minimum standard.
	Yeah. Because we all often make more than a thousand dollars a month.
	But it's also scary that we don't have the safety net for those jobs that are going to go away.
	Exactly that. But it's a very simple thing.
	A tyranny that hasn't yet quite got the control to enforce its tyranny totally is not going to tell you that what it wants to happen are elements of its tyranny.
	They're going to tell you it's a wonderful thing.
	So they're not going to tell you that the basic income, which people like Zuckerberg are now supporting, which is a big, big red flag, because this death cult absolutely controls Silicon Valley.
	That's where all the censorship's coming from.
	This death cult is not just controlling what it's doing and introducing, it's controlling the exposure of what it's doing.
	And why? Because it controls Silicon Valley.
	And as I say and point out in the latter part of the book, a new Silicon Valley is being developed very, very fast in Israel.
	And a place called Beersheba.
	That's one of the most fascinating parts of the book in many ways, how Silicon Valley is being prepared to move locations in terms of where it's ultimately operating out of.
	And this all fits in with the death cult.
	Because if you want to introduce a smart grid system, which is unfolding all around us every day...
	Whereby you connect the human brain to artificial intelligence, thus artificial intelligence becomes the human mind, then if you can control that grid from a central point, which you can, then from that central point, you can control every mind on the planet, as well as every piece of technology which is connected to the same grid.
	And I say that That central point is planned to be Israel.
	And it's planned to be run by the death cult because it's the death cult that's behind not only Silicon Valley, it's behind the smart grid.
	I mean, you know, in the end, what seems to be an incredibly complicated world is actually quite a simple one when you break down what's happening.
	Yes, I agree.
	I agree. That is a great breakdown and some definite things to keep in mind on the road ahead.
	And as we're tying this all together and wrapping it up, and if we're trying to end on a positive note, I know that at our core we're all infinite awareness having a human experience, but does that mean our only option here is to acquiesce?
	Is this too big to overcome?
	Is this a spiritual battle beyond our pay grade?
	Well, I don't like using the word battle, because that's what they want us to do, battle.
	But it is a situation where we have to decide which state of consciousness prevails in terms of the way the world is that we live in.
	I mean, you know, we get into the nature of the world itself.
	I mean, it's nothing like we think we're experiencing for a start.
	But what they've done, because this death cult understands how this reality works.
	It understands who we really are.
	It understands what the body is.
	And thus, it's part of the occult.
	Now, the word occult simply means hidden.
	You know, just because something is occult knowledge doesn't mean it's evil.
	It means it's knowledge that's hidden.
	And we go back to the notebook and the camera and the microphone.
	This occult hidden knowledge can be used for good and it can be used for psychopathic evil.
	What this death cult has done is hijack this knowledge for itself and basically keep it out of the public arena, where the target population doesn't have access to it.
	And what it wants the public to believe, which is what materialist science is all about, which is all a death cult creation, is that We are our bodies.
	We are our name.
	We are our race.
	We are our religion. We are our culture.
	We are our life story.
	Because you're isolating self-identity into a very small bubble of perceived self.
	And that is basically the world of the five senses.
	Which is what the body in our experienced reality, conscious reality, operates in.
	And the world of the five senses is a tiny, tiny, narrow band of not only possibility and reality, it's a tiny band of who we are.
	These names and life stories and races and Cultures, sexualities.
	They're not who we are.
	They're what we're experiencing.
	That's all. And who we are is the consciousness, the awareness that's experiencing them.
	What this death cult has done is manipulate human perception, which is done by control of the education system.
	And, you know, control of the education system means you can indoctrinate children to believe the world's going to end, for instance.
	And you can manipulate people to believe that they are what they're experiencing and that is who we are.
	You're born by accident.
	You have a few years of conscious reality called a human life and then you die and basically cease to exist.
	Well, what that creates is a very meaningless feeling about life itself, really, and human life.
	You know, it's just a cosmic accident, life's a bitch, and then you die.
	And it also limits your sense of self and your sense of potential, because you're self-identifying with a tiny, tiny smear of possibility.
	But when you realize the true I is consciousness, And that consciousness can be the size of a pea or it can be infinite in its expression.
	You realize that your power to change events and change your own life is limited only by your perception of the possibility to do that.
	And so when people start to awaken to the eye beyond the Five cents, me.
	They start to realize that their life becomes more and more synchronistic.
	More and more coincidences start to happen, which put things on a plate to them, almost without effort, that weren't happening before.
	Because as I explain in the books in some detail...
	Our perception of self becomes our experience of reality.
	If you have a perception of self that you are little me, I have no power, why is it that those people live little me powerless lives?
	Whereas others live much more expansive lives and things happen to them that don't happen to other people.
	It doesn't mean that they're better than anyone else.
	It means they're coming from a totally different level of perception of possibility and perception of self-identity.
	For instance, I come from the self-identity that I am infinite awareness having an experience.
	I don't come from the self-identity that I am David Icke, born in Leicester, England in 1952.
	That's my experience.
	It's not me. I am the consciousness having that experience.
	And when you come from that perspective, amazing things start to happen to you.
	Not least, insights that you didn't have before.
	Because as you expand your sense of self-identity, your consciousness subsequently expands...
	And your perceptions start to be formed by greater and greater expansions of consciousness instead of just the five senses.
	And so you see things you couldn't see before.
	You see connections that other people don't see, not because you're better than them, but because you're coming from another level of awareness, which you've allowed yourself to become.
	And that's the point.
	That's the word. Allowed yourself to become.
	Because if you believe only in five sense me, then first of all, you are limited by that perception in what you can create because that's the world of limitation.
	That's the world of I can't.
	But also, and this is the key with the death cult, is if vast numbers of people are self-identifying the I with the body and its race and its sexuality and its life story...
	And its culture, the potential for divide and ruling the target population is infinite.
	And what you're seeing, Greg, now, is Marxism changing.
	The old Marxism...
	Was classically to play the haves off against the have-nots, the proletariat and the bourgeoisie and all that stuff.
	What they're doing with this Marxism is they are creating the group conflict between self-identities and between races.
	And therefore, they have far more groups to play off against each other than the old have-have-nots version of Marxism.
	And this explains why, because now, of course, just quickly, you're seeing conflict between feminists and transgender people, transgender activists, not transgender people.
	And so these self-identities are subdividing and subdividing.
	This is why this LGBT list of letters is getting longer and longer and longer.
	Because people are subdividing into greater and greater minutiae of self-identity.
	And therefore the potential for conflict becomes fantastic.
	But something else comes from this.
	When you had the old Marxism of haves against have-nots, the poor and deprived were played off against what we would now call the billionaires.
	But under self-identity group conflict Marxism, it doesn't matter if you're a billionaire or a pauper.
	What matters is, do you support my particular self-identity?
	And therefore you've got this bizarre alliance now.
	Between social justice warriors and billionaire oligarchs from Silicon Valley and people like George Soros.
	Because as long as the billionaires of Silicon Valley that control the corporations of Silicon Valley and the communications of Silicon Valley and the George Soros' support and fund your self-identity groups, they're one of you.
	And you have, therefore, a man in George Soros who said publicly, my job is to make money.
	I do not look at the social consequences of what I do.
	He is funding social justice warrior groups.
	And they're taking his money and if you expose him they attack you!
	So you can see this extraordinary psychological manipulation that's going on and if you're not streetwise to it and how it works and where it wants to take the world then you're babes in arms lambs to the slaughter because what these kids are doing And the adults that are driving it, in terms of human-caused global warming, and it's the hoax of it, is that they are being manipulated out of fear of the end of the world.
	They're being manipulated into demanding the deletion of their own freedoms.
	And not only that, the deletion of everyone else's Freedoms.
	As I said on the internet this week, it's not the world that's going to end, kids.
	It's your freedom that's going to end.
	That's what this is really all about.
	Well, cheers to that.
	I think that's a pretty good thing to leave people with.
	These are troubled times that require us to stay sharp and avoid The traps that they set, and of course...
	And also, just very quickly, Greg, and also going into what we've just been talking about, they don't work so hard to keep us in a minute eye of consciousness and self-identity because it's a bit of fun.
	They do it because it's fundamental to them achieving their end.
	And if people would just shift their self-identity from I am my labels, as I call them, to I am the consciousness having the experience of those labels, an infinite, eternal consciousness that is in a journey of exploring forever, forever, and this is just a tiny experience that we're having, that very shift In perception of the eye would change the world because of all that would come from it.
	Yes, I guess to some extent freedom is a state of mind.
	Well, very great talking to you today.
	I mean, the trigger is the book.
	DavidIke.com is the website.
	So much content there.
	I'm sure you have another project in the works already.
	Maybe you could give us a preview before we really call it in.
	Oh yeah, I'm going to start another book in just about, maybe about three weeks, which will be absolutely about solutions and consciousness and becoming the true I. So that will be out next year.
	And one other thing we're about to launch is a media channel.
	Because, of course, we're all faced with the censorship.
	So we're launching a media channel through davidike.com maybe in the next three weeks or so.
	And we've already got a phenomenal amount of content and it's cutting edge content in all these different areas.
	People that are suppressed and censored elsewhere Will be on this channel.
	So that's, you know, very, very exciting for people like me because it's going to give a platform to the cutting edge of knowledge across all these different subjects which are being increasingly curtailed by the Silicon Valley corporations.
	Right on. That sounds great.
	I mean, this is a revival of a project that was attempted before, right?
	Well, it was attempted before, and that was a massive learning process because what came through the door in terms of volunteers were some lovely, wonderful people and a lot of volunteers.
	Of basically toxic people who set out to destroy it, basically, or to use it for their own ends.
	So that was a massive learning experience.
	That is very different to what we are doing this time, which is a very small, knit group of people that have absolutely the right intent and integrity to make this work.
	It will work. And it's got to work because this...
	Censorship through Silicon Valley is not something that has reached its peak.
	It's just where it is now.
	And this death cult runs Silicon Valley.
	And so the goal, eventually...
	Is to ensure that people anywhere only see and hear what the death cult wants them to see and hear.
	And that takes us straight into the pages of 1984, of course, which is exactly where we're heading, but Orwell underestimated, as you would expect, and underestimated where it was going because in those days he didn't understand the scale of technology that was going to be available.
	Mm-hmm, mm-hmm.
	Man, well, you know, we live and learn.
	You got noble goals and you're getting more done before breakfast than I do all day.
	So, very awesome.
	You are such a workhorse and a living legend in this quest for truth, man.
	I appreciate everything you do.
	Thanks for taking the time to talk to me today and keep fighting the good fight.
	Real pleasure, Greg.
	I tell you what. The day I leave this world will be a few seconds after I've written my last words, I tell you.
	Because I ain't going anywhere.
	I'm in this for the long haul.
	In many ways, it's only just begun.
	Well, I look forward to following you up to the last word.
	It's got to be a long time from now, Greg, I'll tell you that.
	Indeed. Alright man, well have a good one.

▲