All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 23, 2019 - David Icke
28:02
Were Drones Used In The 9/11 Attacks? - David Icke
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is the end of the video. Thank you for watching.
It'll be interesting to see actually what the reaction is.
It's impossible to call, really.
Okay, anyone else? Yeah.
Have you read Judy Wood's book about the towers disappearing and the energy weapon being used for the main ones?
Yeah, have I read the Judy Wood book Where Did the Towers Go, right?
Yes, I have.
And I cover that in the book.
And funnily enough, in Alice in One Land and the World Trade Center disaster, which I published in 2002, there is a section there that talks about could directed energy weapons, as they're now called, have been used?
And Judy Wood makes a very good case.
I outline it and let people make their own mind up.
But What we should understand is, and I've been banging on about this for decades, is that there is a cutting edge of technology that we see in the public arena.
And we think that's the cutting edge of technology.
Oh, bloody hell no.
These people are not working with the level of technology that we see.
They are working with a technology that's way beyond that.
But even now...
This technology that is being talked about, possibly being a reason the towers came down as they did, directed energy weapons, is now coming more and more into the public arena.
And if you work on the basis of technology that we see now, and we think is cutting edge, was actually known about way back on the inside, then all this energy weapon stuff was available in...
In 2001.
And the idea is that these directed energy weapons basically they break up the structure of matter.
And what they would do to a building like the World Trade Center is they would literally turn into dust.
And we all remember the phenomenal clouds of dust.
That is one of the most shocking sights of the towers coming down.
But anyway, that's in the book so that people can see that.
I've mentioned Operation Northwoods tonight, haven't I? You haven't, but we've got one more question.
I was actually going to steal it myself and ask about the remote control planes, which is very, very interesting.
Right. Well, I'm going to do two things.
I'm going to do Operation Northwoods and I'm going to do the remote control planes because that...
Brings in another. They didn't do what?
I'll come to that in a second.
Operation Northwoods. The reason I asked, have I said it tonight, is because I did an interview for three hours earlier today.
Did I mention it in that one?
I haven't mentioned it in this one. Operation Northwoods was basically the plan for 9-11 in 1962.
In the summer before 9-11, a former investigative producer with ABC in America, a guy called James Banford, produced a book on the National Security Agency.
And in researching that book, he came across official documents in the American archive, not conspiracy theory, actual documents, Which had been known about in other less high profile ways before.
But he really brought them to public attention.
And this described Operation Northwoods.
And this was the plan.
It was during the Kennedy era presidency.
And in the end it turns out that Kennedy put a stop to it.
We go back to the Joint Chiefs of Staff in the Pentagon, which were headed on 9-11 by General Richard Myers, who said he was on Capitol Hill when he was on a telly screen from the Pentagon.
And the Joint Chiefs of Staff were headed in 1962 by a guy called Lemnitzer.
And at the time, they wanted to remove Castro from Cuba.
Actually, this story will bring us into remote control planes, won't it?
And so this was the plan, all in the official documents, that they were going to set up terrorist attacks in major American cities like New York and Miami, which the military were going to do And they were going to blame them on Cuban terrorists.
They were going to sink American shipping and blame them on Cuban attacks.
And this is another thing.
It's all described in the document, which takes us to 9-11.
One of the plans, detailed, was that they would pick a flight from an East Coast airport that would take, as part of its normal commercial route, would take the plane over Cuba at a very high altitude, obviously. And the document said that they were going to With, quote, carefully created aliases.
And then the plane would fly, as part of a normal commercial flight, think 9-11, down to Florida, across Florida on its way across Cuba, And a drone, a remotely controlled plane of the same type painted in the colours of the same airline would take off from Eglin Air Force Base in Florida would meet up with the plane that left the airport so basically they become almost one blip on the radar which in 1962 was less sophisticated than it was in 2001 and the drone would replace the plane that left the airport the plane that left the airport would then be landed at Eglin Air Force Base and the passengers would be taken off the drone would be flown across Cuban airspace all in the document Where it would be exploded by radio signal.
And it says in the document that we will wait for the international aviation authorities to tell us that the plane had gone down to give more credibility to the fact that we knew nothing about it.
And they were going to blame the plane coming down on an attack by Cuban forces to justify an invasion of Cuba.
It's all in the official record.
Operation Northwards it was called.
And what we had at 9-11 was a very much more expanded version of that when the attack was set up To justify the invasions that are followed that were listed before 9-11 happened.
Now, that's a very interesting thing.
Because in 1962 they had the technology to fly a remotely controlled plane of considerable size of commercial aircraft over Cuba.
Remote control technology of aircraft has been known since back in the 50s and it's my view and I explain in the book why that the planes that left the airports on 9-11 were not the planes that hit the buildings and crashed in Pennsylvania.
Because of the war games And the simulation over live and all the dots that were going on to do with the war games and the simulated planes.
Changing planes was a doddle that morning.
And people, and I quote them in the book, who witnessed the crash of Flight 175 into the South Tower with the big fireball...
Described the plane not in terms of a commercial 767, but like a military plane of the same type.
Because they military used planes like that, 767s and stuff like that.
They did that anyway. And interestingly, pilots for 9-11 Truth, which are commercial pilots, some of which flew those actual planes...
That got together to challenge the official story because they say all the aviation part of the story is ridiculous.
It's not possible. Do you know the guy, they say, flew Flight 77 into the Pentagon with a spiral turn that these pilots say they could not have done was a man called Hany Hanzhaw That's the official story.
Annie Hanjor was banned from hiring a one-engine plane six weeks before 9-11 because he was so bloody incompetent and dangerous.
Somehow he manifested that ability in six weeks.
Ludicrous. Annie Hanjor was no more at the controls of Flight 77 than I was.
And what these pilots say, because...
At lower altitudes, where the air is thicker and the air pressure is greater, they have to do slower speeds than they would at high altitude, because if they didn't, the stability of the structure would start to come apart.
And these pilots, and I saw in the book in detail, Looked at the speeds that Flight 11 and Flight 175 were supposed to be doing at very low altitude as they hit the buildings.
And they looked at the strength, stability of those aircraft, 767s, commercial version of 767s.
And they concluded that at those speeds, at that altitude...
Those planes would have been, A, unflyable.
As one pilot described it, it would have been like driving a car at 150 miles an hour and parking it in a one-car garage without hitting the sides.
That's what it would have been like.
They went on simulators to try to recapture...
The possibility of doing it, they found they couldn't do it.
But what they did say was that if they were strengthened versions of the 767, which they used in the military, not least in refuelling aircraft, then those aircraft would have been able to fly at those speeds at that altitude without falling apart.
And So, for me, the planes that hit the buildings were remotely controlled.
And the planes that took off were not the planes that hit the buildings.
Now, it would be so easy to prove that they were the same planes.
Piece of cake. Every time there's an air crash, The investigators do a number of things every time, and one of them is this.
They take the parts that are found, and all these parts, particularly parts they call time-change parts, they're parts of an aircraft that have to be changed, even if there's nothing wrong with them, they have to be changed by regulation at certain periods.
They all have serial numbers on them.
And when those parts are changed, the serial number of the part going into the plane is logged in the maintenance log of that aircraft.
So what they do is they get the parts, they look at these serial numbers, they check them off against the log of the aircraft that they think it is, and they prove, yes, they're the same codes, this is that aircraft.
They do it every time. Except on 9-11.
They didn't do it on 9-11.
And I know this for a fact because there was a Freedom of Information Act request to the FBI to produce the documentation of that process being done with the 9-11 planes.
The FBI replied that documentation does not exist because that process was not done and they said it wasn't done because there was no question as to the identity of the planes.
When you read the book you'll see there's massive questions about the identity of the planes.
So it's a conspiracy theory that they weren't the same planes.
Okay! So why didn't you prove it by doing what he's done with every other air crash?
Because they weren't the same planes that hit the building and crashed in Pennsylvania.
Maybe a bit more likely that one, but not the ones that hit the buildings that left the airports.
Another thing. The first thing that pilots are supposed to do when there's a hijacking Is punch in a four-digit code in their aircraft next to them.
Bang, bang, bang. That's how long it takes.
Bang, bang, bang, bang. First thing they're supposed to do.
Not one of the pilots in any of the four aircraft on 9-11 punched in the hijack code.
Which is the first thing they're supposed to do.
None of them. No one can explain that.
Very quickly on some of the phone calls.
Another thing. What happened is it was said that passengers were making calls from the plane on cell phones.
On the planes on cell phones.
Particularly like 93.
Like 77 etc.
And then it was pointed out That cell phones didn't work at the altitudes that those planes were flying when those calls were made.
So the story changed.
This is another thing you find with the 9-11 story.
When they're caught out, they just change the bloody story.
So, what they then said was, oh, no, they were made on air phones.
They weren't cell phones, they were air phones, which were Seatback phones.
I used one myself once, about the same period.
And they're on the back of the seats, and they could connect you to the ground.
Very, very bloody expensive, but they're connected to the ground.
And it was said that a CNN contributor, envisioned contributor, called Barbara Olsen, Called her husband in the Justice Department, a guy called Ted Holston, who was the Solicitor General in the Bush administration, from Flight 77, and told him what was going on.
And from that apparent conversation came the whole story about box cutters.
And it was said, first of all, that she called from the And then it was pointed out that she couldn't have called from a cell phone at that altitude.
So then suddenly she called from...
Oh no, she called from an air phone.
That explains it. And then as I show in the book, American Airlines, which is what Flight 77 was, American Airlines 757s had removed and disconnected the air phones from 757s by 2001.
So there were no bloody air phones on the plane.
Also... The record of calls both from Barbara Olsen to the Justice Department and the Justice Department receiving those calls doesn't exist.
The calls weren't made.
And then you have a guy called Tom Burnett who called his wife from Flight 93.
What happened was that when she received the call, his cell phone number came up on her phone.
He's calling her on a cell phone from the plane.
Official story says, well, of course, someone was because his cell phone came up.
According to the flight data recorder, when that Call on the cell phone was made.
The plane it was made from was flying at between 34,000 and 40,000 feet.
You're never going to make a cell phone call from there.
It's impossible. And when that was pointed out, the FBI changed the story.
They said he called from an air phone.
Right? Which was still in United Airlines planes at the time, which 93 was.
But he didn't. He called from a cell phone.
At that altitude? Explain that.
And then you had Todd Beamer.
And he talked to a...
He was on Flight 93.
He talked to a Verizon supervisor called Lisa Jefferson for a long time from the plane.
She didn't know if it was Todd Beamer or not.
Never met him. And he called from an air phone.
And he was the guy who is quoted as saying, though there's great doubt about it when you look at the evidence, let's roll, which became the big way that they promoted American response in the Middle East, let's roll.
And she was first of all staggered that the phone connection didn't.
Disappear, because she said, air phone calls all around her were just disappearing and, you know, breaking up, going off, disconnecting.
But this one just continued and continued.
Not only that, she stayed on the line.
She's a supervisor. She knows whether the line's open or not.
Because, as she said, when the line is broken...
It makes a particular noise and you know the connection's gone.
But this line stayed open.
And it stayed open for a long time after Flight 93 was supposed to have crashed.
And these air phone systems get their power from the aircraft.
So as it crashed, it's all open.
Obviously. But the line stayed open.
Another family who were on the line with someone else on that plane, their line also stayed open for a long, long time after the plane was supposed to have crashed.
And Todd Beamer, who was on Flight 93, who talked to, who had said this Lisa Jefferson at Verizon, his cell phone was used 19 times to make outgoing calls to After the plane was supposed to have crashed.
So, given that I've talked for a couple of hours here, and I have absolutely scratched the surface of what's in this book in terms of demolition of the official story, and also, I've only scratched the surface on the story of who did it.
And you can see that even from what I said tonight is explosive stuff and makes the official story completely untenable.
And then you think that everything those people wanted before 9-11, they got because of 9-11.
And the real reason those attacks happened becomes clear.
I dedicate the book both to the people who died on 9-11 and their loved ones left behind, and also to all those who died in the war on terror justified by 9-11 and their loved ones left behind.
And when you see the scale of contempt That those behind 9-11, who covered up 9-11, continue to do so, have for those people.
You can begin to appreciate the level of psychopathy, the level of psychopath that we are dealing with.
People who would, for political ends, Pepperbomb entire countries of civilians.
Are we going to really believe that they would have any compunction about 3,000 dead people on 9-11?
To this level of psychopath, they are just fodder in their game of absolutely no importance.
The only thing that's important is what they achieve by doing it.
And that's why I Sod consequences.
I don't care. If we don't stand up and look this death cult in the eye and refuse to blink, then it will go on and complete what it set out to achieve.
And what I do in the last two chapters is look at where this death cult wants to take us from here.
And it is in the complete control of Of human perception by connecting the human brain to AI. This death cult is behind that.
The same death cult behind 9-11 is behind that.
It's behind the introduction of 5G without any independent tests.
It's behind Silicon Valley.
The death cult Sabbatean Frankists own Silicon Valley.
And they're moving and they're creating another Silicon Valley as well somewhere else in the world which I expose in the book.
And what is Sabbatean Frankist Silicon Valley doing now?
It's embarked on an hysterical extreme tidal wave of censorship and To stop the exposure of Sabbatean Frankism.
So this cult is not only doing what it's doing and did what it did on 9-11, it's now controlling its own exposure through Google, through Facebook, through YouTube, who are increasingly censoring those that are seeking to expose what's going on So it's doing it and it's blocking the overwhelmingly more and more people get banned the exposure of what it's doing and that's why I say this book is the arm going through the elevator doors as they're about to close on human freedom and how can consequences matter to you when we're at this point at this point in the road Well,
if we don't take our power back now, this cult will create a nightmare.
Both for people alive today, but even more so for our children and grandchildren.
▲
Export Selection