Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 11, 2019 - David Icke

02:30:37

David Icke - "The Trigger" Book Launch Live From Derby

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you you
	you thank you
	you you
	thank you thank you
	Thank you. Thanks for coming.
	Hello, everyone. As my brother Jay said, welcome to the official release of The Trigger.
	Welcome to everyone now that's watching on a stream, I think YouTube or Facebook or both.
	I've got a few questions that I'm going to ask for the first hour, which is going to kind of hopefully cover most of it, but there is then a Q&A, so if I've missed anything, forgive me, and obviously you get a chance to ask.
	So what I'll do, start it off, is just ask my dad.
	I can't call you David, it feels weird, so I'll just call you dad.
	I know, I know, Ethel. Give us a brief overview of the book and why you wrote it.
	Well, I remember the day it happened.
	And by then, I'd done many years of research into how a few people control human society and are dictating its direction.
	And one of the things that I've been talking about for years was something I call problem-reaction-solution.
	It is a phenomenally effective mass mind control technique to get the public perception to think what you want them to think so that you will be able to do what you want to do.
	And for those Watching on the internet, who may not have come across it, I'm sure most people here will have done, having read the books.
	Problem, reaction, solution works like this.
	Stage one, you create a problem.
	It could be a terrorist attack, it could be a war, it could be a run on a currency.
	Whatever the problem needs to be that allows you to provide the solution to that problem that you want to change society in the way you want to do it.
	and so at stage one you create a problem and crucially you blame someone else for it and you can see problem reaction solution scenarios particularly when with no evidence immediately something happens the villain is being named and in terms of 9-11 Osama Bin Laden and Afghanistan were being named by a man called Ehud Barak, former Prime Minister of Israel, immediately after the attacks happened.
	And of course the plan was to invade Afghanistan.
	That's why Afghanistan was mentioned that early, even though everyone else is going, what happened?
	What's going on? What's happening at the same time?
	Stage two, you want people in fear and outrage Because you want them to say, in effect, do something.
	Something must be done.
	What are you going to do about it?
	Or, at the very least, the public become open to what the authorities say must be done as a result of the problem.
	And in terms of 9-11, it was just such a blatant example, as I saw it on the day, Of problem, reaction, solution.
	Where you create the problem, you blame someone else for it, you get the reaction, something must be done, and then you offer the solutions to the problems you have yourself created but blame someone else for.
	And I looked at it and I thought, this is a classic.
	And when they started justifying the invasion of countries as a result of it, it became even more obvious to me.
	so I started investigating it from the first day onwards through 2001 and 2002 and as far as I know in my own experience I produced the first major book questioning the official story of 9-11 in September 2002 it was published Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster why the official story of 9-11 is a monumental lie And that came out and then through the years that followed that I obviously kept my eye on the ball.
	I was always interested in new information regarding 9-11.
	And then in 2018 I decided I was going to do an update on Alice in Wonderland.
	Well that lasted two bloody weeks, that did.
	Because after two weeks I thought I've got to start from scratch here.
	Because of the enormous amount of information that had been compiled from many different sources, in the meantime, to show that the official story of 9-11 is not just wrong, it's not just a lie, it is extraordinary in its mendacity.
	I was talking on an interview this morning and I said, imagine...
	9-11 is like a centipede with lots and lots of legs.
	In other words, different aspects of the story.
	And every single one of those legs of the centipede has an Achilles heel to show that it couldn't have happened or what we're being told is not the whole truth and often not the truth in any way, shape or form.
	It's extraordinary.
	There's nothing that stands up.
	So I started investigating and...
	All the way through 2018 and 2019 up to, most of 2018 and 2019 up to now.
	And put together a book, it's two books actually, between one cover, or two covers.
	The first half of the book demolishes the official story of 9-11.
	And you know, when people read it, if they're not Know much about 9-11.
	They are going to be absolutely shocked at the lies that have been told, provably so.
	The second half of the book starts an amazing story which leads eventually to who actually was behind it.
	And it wasn't 19 Islamic extremists.
	Who hijacked those planes, it is claimed.
	That part of the book alone is going to be extraordinarily controversial because of who I say was actually behind it.
	We'll get into that as we go along.
	That's the background of how I came to write it.
	And even someone like me, who's been looking at this since it happened, was taken aback by some of the stuff that I came across in terms of the official story.
	It's not even partly true.
	It's an extraordinary lie.
	I actually remember when that happened.
	We were actually together. We were in Portsmouth.
	I was playing a gig with a little band that I was playing with at the time.
	We'd gone to a bar before the gig and it was on all the screens.
	Obviously, everyone was watching it. I remember you immediately saying, I think the term was, this is bollocks.
	You'd kind of straight away seen through the nonsense while everyone else was kind of like, you know, this is dreadful, this is dreadful.
	I was going to ask you what the kind of main red flags were, but then, as you said then, about the Achilles heel, and it made me think, like, Building 7 now has got to be the biggest Achilles heel, surely?
	Yeah. Building 7, this is an extraordinary story.
	If you said to most people, it probably is still most people, How many buildings fell on 9-11?
	They would say two.
	The Twin Towers.
	But actually three did.
	The third one was called Building 7.
	It was part of the World Trade Centre complex.
	World Trade Centre Building 7.
	And it was owned by Larry Silverstein.
	And it was owned by him before, in the July of 2001...
	He and another guy called Frank Lowy of Westfield Moles bought the lease to the Twin Towers which went into private hands for the first time.
	We'll get into that as we go along in the background to that.
	But he owned Building 7.
	Building 7 was not hit by a plane and came down A 47-storey steel-frame building.
	It fell about 5.20 in the afternoon.
	And the official explanation of why this building collapsed was office furnishings fire.
	Right? Office furnishings fire.
	It is the most blatant, obvious controlled demolition you'll ever see.
	And if people go on the internet who are new to this and put in Building 7 collapse, they will see exactly with Building 7 what happens again and again, you see them on the news from time to time, when demolition companies put charges in buildings, sometimes they're stadiums, sometimes they're high-rise blocks.
	And they are charged in a way that makes the building not topple over and hit other buildings around it, but to fall on its own footprint.
	And to do that, what they do is they make sure that as the building is falling, the building below is exploding, so there's no resistance as the top falls that can topple it over.
	And Building 7 is such a blatant Controlled demolition.
	I quote people in the trigger, building experts, engineers, architects, because there's a whole organization in America called Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, who are engineering and architectural experts who literally came together, just like pilots for 9-11 Truth, firefighters for 9-11 Truth, and so many other people, groups, To challenge the official story in their area of expertise.
	And I quote all these building experts saying it was a controlled demolition.
	The building, Building 7, fell for the first 2.5 seconds at free fall speed.
	And you only fall at freefall speed if there's nothing to stop your freefall.
	In other words, the building below is not there as the top comes down.
	We were told, actually, that it was a controlled demolition by the owner, Larry Silverstein.
	He was caught with his pants down and obviously wishes he hadn't said it but he spoke, he was interviewed in a PBS Public Service Broadcasting documentary about 9-11 in the United States and he was asked about Building 7 and if I can do it with one hand I'm going to read you the quote This is what he said about Building 7 and why it came down.
	You know this building that the official government story says it fell because of office furnishings fires.
	Making it the only steel-framed building before or since in architectural history that I've lost my place now.
	In architectural history, that has fallen because of fire.
	Let me find this. Larry Silverstein, while I'm finding it, with Frank Lowey, bought the lease to the World Trade Center towers in July 2001.
	And increased substantially the insurance on the buildings in the case of a terrorist attack.
	Can you find the one there that says, how did the mighty fall?
	There's a Silverstein quote.
	I'll find it in a second. And for a...
	personal 14 million dollar input from himself to buy the lease the down payment on the lease he received as a result of the 9-11 catastrophe 4.5 billion dollars and the Twin Towers were believed in the business community in New York to be a white elephant.
	Why is this man buying these towers?
	They're under occupied, they've got big problems, they're aging.
	But he bought them because he said he had this desire, this long-term desire to buy them.
	And it turned out to be to be a very good deal as it turned out for a $14 million investment to come up with $4.5 billion.
	I can't find it, but I can remember the quote.
	This is what he said on this PBS documentary.
	I was called by the fire commander who said to me that The fires in Building 7 were getting hard to keep under control.
	It turns out they were out by then.
	And this fire commander, who's supposed to have called him, has never ever come forward to say, yes, I did it.
	It was me. And Silverstein said, and I said to...
	Well, you've got the quote. Finally got there, yeah.
	Yeah, we've got the quote. I like to do it word for word.
	So, thanks.
	No worries. So this is the quote.
	I remember getting a call from the fire department commander and they said they weren't sure they were going to be able to contain the fire.
	Like I say, by this time the fire is out.
	I said, you know, we've had such a terrible loss of life.
	The smartest thing to do is pull it.
	And they made that decision to pull.
	and we watched the building collapse now two things to that one fire officers do not pull buildings and secondly to make the building collapse in on its own footprint as building 7 did Requires weeks of work putting charges in the building to make sure that it falls as it should.
	The claim by Silverstein of having a conversation with a fire commander deciding to pull the building and then shortly after watching it fall is absolutely ridiculous and impossible.
	And what you find with the 9-11 story, in all its different aspects, as I say, are stories like this of utter impossibility and the suspension of the laws of physics.
	Why? Because the whole thing is a gigantic lie.
	to create a massive problem to which solutions can be offered and those solutions we have seen in endless attempts at regime change in the Middle East, in destruction of privacy, destruction of freedom and justifying ever more outrageous and extreme surveillance.
	Now the 9-11 Commission which investigated The official investigation of 9-11 was resisted by President Boy Bush and Dick Cheney.
	We've had this horrific attack, this horror, and in any decent same society that would be followed by the most painstaking Investigation in American history.
	Instead, Bush and Cheney resisted having any investigation at all.
	Then when public pressure forced them to, they announced that the man who was going to head it was Henry Kissinger.
	A man who you wouldn't trust to tell you the time in a room full of clocks.
	Someone who's been a master major manipulator on behalf of this very cabal that I've been exposing for 30 years throughout most of his adult life.
	So Kissinger's appointment was so outrageous that eventually he had to stand down.
	They put in charge an executive director called Philip Zelicow.
	I'll get it to him later.
	Let's say at the moment that he was a big time Bush administration insider.
	And he set out to make sure that no information that questioned the official story of 9-11 got into that report.
	Now he has a big problem with Building 7.
	He has an obvious controlled demolition He has a ludicrous official story of this furnishings fire which he really can't justify.
	So what does he do?
	He doesn't mention it.
	In the 9-11 report there is no mention of Building 7 simply because there's no way of explaining it except by a controlled demolition.
	If it's a controlled demolition Then the story is a lie.
	And if that's a lie, the whole house of cards starts to fall down.
	And what's happened in the last few days, coincidentally, synchronistically, is that an academic investigation into Building 7 by the University of Alaska Fairbanks has produced the result of a four year investigation with building experts etc into the question could building seven have fallen because of fire and their conclusion a few days ago was no it could not have done.
	And so, before we get into a load of other stuff that makes no sense and is obviously mendacious, Building 7 is the big red flag, the big Achilles heel, because the official story is so obviously made up.
	I'm not an expert, obviously, in controlled demolition, but to me I would think if Building 7 was controlled demolition, which it certainly looks like, same with the towers, to be fair, there would be evidence of that, yet the evidence was shipped off.
	Well, let's go to the Twin Towers.
	The Twin Towers fell in free-fall speed in a period of about 10 seconds, mean fit.
	110 stories of the Twin Towers fell in free fall speed, which again obviously means there was no resistance.
	What is the official story?
	That the towers fell because as the weight of the top falling hit the lower floors, it pancaked down.
	Now, you know, I left school at 15 to play football.
	I didn't take any major exams or any of it, but even I can work out That if something is pancaking and receiving resistance as it falls, it cannot possibly fall in freefall time.
	But it did. So, how was that possible?
	Only because lower parts of the building were disappearing for whatever reason, some say directed energy weapons, some say explosive charges.
	so there was no resistance as the top fell but that's not a problem because what you do is you get building experts, explosive experts, all these people in and you get them to go through the steel and the rubble of what remains of the buildings and they will, through that research Be able to establish what brought the buildings down.
	Now if you are creating an attack to justify a series of events, still ongoing by the way, then the last thing you want are for experts to establish what actually happened which is very different to what you're telling the public happened.
	So what they did, and the overall criminal investigation of 9-11 was headed by the head of the criminal division of the US Justice Department, a man called Michael Shertoff, an ultra-Zionist extremist called Michael Shertoff.
	And in his hierarchy the decision was made to start shipping the steel and the rubble away from Ground Zero and from Building 7 as fast as possible.
	And it was taken in trucks and the trucks were tracked by GPS and truck drivers were actually sacked for taking a half an hour break on the journey and not going straight there and they were taken to scrap yards in New Jersey and there it was immediately, the steel was immediately cut up into small sections And ship to Asia for smelting to become someone's fridge.
	And if you can open that there for me, mate.
	I think it's there unless...
	I want to give you, if you can find it, I think you can.
	Get me glasses on.
	Thanks, mate. I'll hold that. You hold that so I don't lose my place again.
	How about this for...
	No, it's not there, mate.
	Is it there? No, I'm looking for a quote.
	I'll give it to you. I'm looking for a quote from the New York Times.
	I'll give it to you anyway.
	Leave it in there. Speak up.
	This is how much those behind 9-11 have contempt...
	for the families of those who died on 9-11 the scrap or the rubble, the remains of the buildings were taken to these scrap yards and they were shipped to Asia as fast as possible and the New York Times, which is the quote I was looking for did a story on how building experts and architects We're going to the scrap yard and as the big grabbers came down and moved stuff away as the grabber moved away they would run into the rubble and the steel looking to see for anything of value and relevance in establishing what happened and then the grabber would come back and they'd run away waiting for the next chance this is what was happening With people investigating why the towers and how the towers came down.
	This is what they were having to do.
	And very quickly that had gone to Asia for smelting.
	Why? Because they absolutely did not want the truth to be known about why those towers came down because the whole house of cards would come down with that.
	And it's an extraordinary contempt for those who died and their loved ones left behind.
	That's how much desire this cabal truly behind 9-11, that we'll get into later, had for those who died.
	Because they're psychopaths.
	And psychopaths, the greatest trait of psychopaths, is they have no empathy.
	There seems to be a bit of a roulette with a problem, reaction, solution or a false flag in general, which is generally, did someone shout Al-Akbar or did someone hear that?
	Was there a passport found or was there a drill happening at the time?
	9-11 sort of has the full shebang, particularly with war games and stuff.
	Yeah, let's get into some of the things that happened on 9-11 then, apart from the buildings.
	How many people know that on 9-11 there was, and this is the word that was used to describe them, an unprecedented number of war game exercises going on in the 9-11 skies.
	Actually on 9-11, while the hijackings were happening, These exercises were practice sessions for the American military and Air Force to respond to hijackings.
	One of the scenarios was for a plane to have been flown into a building in Washington, the National Reconnaissance Office.
	And what was happening is on the show And as part of the war games they were simulating planes on the screens that weren't actually there but was just part of the simulation of the exercise.
	And so this completely and utterly confused the reaction by NORAD to these reports of the 9-11 plane hijackings and in the book I include some of the tapes of recordings of what these people were saying to each other and when the 9-11 reports were coming in of the 9-11 planes the NORAD staff, military We're saying things like, is this real or is this exercise?
	One of the people involved said when the reports first came in, his reaction was, well, they've started the exercises early.
	And at one point, the simulated planes that didn't actually exist As part of the exercise, it got so confusing to the reaction system that one of them shouts, get rid of the God and sin!
	But it wasn't got rid of until basically the 9-11 were over.
	Because it was there, the war games were there.
	Actually on that day, it was impressive.
	It was there to confuse the reaction process to allow the attacks to happen without a military intervention.
	To give you an idea of what should have happened in 1999 there was a golfer called Payne Stewart and he took off in a private plane with some people just going on a trip I think it was to Dallas and there was a decompression problem And everyone basically blacked out.
	Everyone was unconscious on the plane.
	Immediately, air traffic control realized there was a problem.
	As the regulations demand, they contacted NORAD and NORAD had planes up immediately.
	Immediately! And other planes came up and tracked it across America on its trip because it was flying itself.
	And they were waiting to see if it was going to fall, because it was going to run out of fuel eventually.
	They were waiting to see if it was going to fall under civilian area, and if it had been the chance of doing that, they would have blown it out of the sky.
	And if you look at the regulations, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Civilian Air Traffic Control Organization, it's very clear.
	If you lose contact with an aircraft or anything strange is happening with the aircraft, you cannot explain, treat it as an emergency and start the process of contacting NORAD. In the entire, what, two hours that these attacks were going on, not one single reaction from the military happened that made any difference to the outcome of the events.
	The so-called plane that hit the Pentagon, Flight 77, flew 40 minutes into the Midwest From Dulles Airport, Washington.
	And according to the official story, turned round and flew back 40 minutes to hit the Pentagon.
	And in that whole period, there was no response from a NORAD reaction system that was up in the air in no time when a private jet from Payne Stewart's private jet was in trouble.
	In the previous year before 9-11, 125 times NORAD had reacted in the same way to problems reported with aircraft in America.
	On 9-11, absolutely nothing.
	For the first week, the official story was that no planes were scrambled in reaction to the hijackings and then suddenly after about seven days out of nowhere CBS News a guy called Dan Rather reported oh yes there was a reaction planes were scrambled from Cape Cod in Massachusetts to the attacks on the World Trade Center and from Langley Virginia To the attack on the Pentagon.
	And then suddenly, the official story, which had been, well, no one was scrambled until the Pentagon was hit, suddenly was, oh yeah, we did, we did.
	So that became the official story.
	Cape Cod is 153 miles from the World Trade Center.
	The Langley Base is 130 miles from The Pentagon.
	Just take Washington as an example.
	Around Washington is a no-fly zone called P56 and if you enter, especially the inner part of that zone then you must be transmitting a permission code otherwise you're going to get shot out of the air If you get too close to the buildings of Washington, like the Pentagon, the White House, etc.
	And somehow this plane got into Washington and the official story says hit the Pentagon.
	I quote in the book a former US Defence Secretary called Caspar Weinberger Who described the process.
	He said Washington is ringed with Air Force bases and any plane that enters that no-fly zone without permission, without the code is immediately met with a response from those air bases and there are also, by the way, ground-to-air missile defence for the Pentagon, White House and that area which was not activated on 9-11th.
	Why? Ten miles down the road from the Pentagon and the White House is the Andrews Air Force Base.
	This is where Air Force One, the President, flies in and out of.
	It's where foreign leaders come in and out of, where they're going to the White House.
	And it's ten miles down the road.
	After the Pentagon was hit, and by the way there is a big common theme here, in many many areas, that nothing was done until the Pentagon was hit.
	A series of people like Rumsfeld and others absolutely lied, I show that they lied in the book, about where they were and what they were doing until the Pentagon was hit.
	Everyone was looking for a cover story of why they could do nothing until the Pentagon was hit.
	Because it was being allowed to happen.
	After the Pentagon was hit, planes, it's reported in the mainstream papers, planes from the Andrews Air Force Base were scrambled to patrol the skies above Washington to protect from other attacks.
	And yet, the planes scrambled to react to the incoming Flight 77, as he's claimed, We're scrambled from 130 miles away and never made it before the Pentagon was hit.
	Not only that, the pilots who were scrambled said they weren't told what they were scrambled for.
	We already had, by that time, the World Trade Center towers, both of them hit.
	But they weren't told.
	So what they did is they flew into the Atlantic.
	From Langley. Because they thought they were being scrambled because of a threat coming from the Atlantic, which they always did during the Cold War.
	They said no one told them.
	As a result of that detour and other things I explained in the book, they never got there before the Pentagon was hit.
	When you look at the normal reaction times of NORAD to hijackings, and then you look at the absolute non-response, while the 9-11 hijackings were going on, it's obvious there was a stand-down.
	This is another example.
	It goes on in every aspect of 9-11.
	Of a principle described by a man called Fletcher Prouty.
	He was a guy who was an insider in the intelligence military community in America.
	He died just before 9-11 actually.
	And he was describing, he wrote books about the Kennedy assassination and who really did it.
	And he was describing what to look for in the case of an assassination.
	And in this sense it applies absolutely to the events of 9-11 he said if you want to get an idea of who was behind it look at who had the power to call off the normal security precautions at the time that the event happens because he said assassinations terrorist attacks don't just happen they are allowed to happen by the normal response systems being stood down that's exactly what happened on on 9-11 and in everywhere that you look you find this non-reaction phenomena And if the reaction had been the normal one in the circumstances, a lot of people would still be alive today in America who are not now.
	But this is another thing.
	We are told that these 19 hijackers were highly professional.
	You can find out the NORAD response procedure and the regulations that they follow on the freaking internet.
	You've only got to look at the story of Payne Stewart to see how they react when there's a problem in a plane, particularly if it's a likely or reported hijack.
	And yet, they hijack planes, it is claimed, Flying from one airport and then they hit buildings somewhere else.
	In the case of Flight 77, they fly it 40 minutes out into the Midwest, turn it round and bring it all the way back again.
	Now, in the normal response procedures of NORAD, that would be impossible.
	They wouldn't get near Washington.
	But they did it anyway, these professional hijackers.
	Why? Because those who really did it, not 19 hijackers as reported, knew there wasn't going to be any reaction.
	And when I talk about this common theme of nothing happening until the Pentagon was hit and people producing cover stories to explain their non-reaction before the Pentagon was hit I give you the story of a man called General Richard Myers, who on 9-11 was the acting head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the Pentagon, the highest on the day uniformed military chief, and Donald Rumsfeld, the Defence Secretary.
	What were they doing on 9-11?
	Well, this is what they said.
	Remember, all these war games are going on in the skies, so when that's happening, unprecedented numbers of war games, people like Rumsfeld and Myers, they would be in the command center at the Pentagon overseeing it.
	No, apparently not.
	What Myers said, he said this in interviews on army radio and in other situations, I quote him in the book.
	He said, what happened on 9-11?
	He said, I was on Capitol Hill having a meeting with a senator called Cleland, Max Cleland, about some hearings coming up.
	And he said, just before I went into the meeting, he said, someone said to me, a plane's hit the World Trade Center.
	So you are the acting head of the military at that day, at uniform level.
	What would you do?
	Would you contact the Pentagon and say, what the hell's going on with this plane?
	No, no. He said, I went into the meeting with Max Cleland discussing something about some hearings on Capitol Hill coming up.
	He then said, I came out of the meeting And someone told me that another plane had hit the World Trade Centre and almost immediately after he came out of the meeting someone said the Pentagon's been hit.
	So we're being asked to believe that this guy has heard about the first plane and gone into a routine meeting Not being told as the uniform head of the military that day that a second one has hit the World Trade Center and when he came out only then did he hear about the Pentagon.
	Note the common theme.
	He was not able to respond until the Pentagon was hit.
	Come back to him in a second.
	Donald Rumsfeld said that that morning he was sitting in his office at the Pentagon next to the command centre and all the military chiefs around him in the offices and he held a breakfast meeting he said and then he said someone came in and handed him a note which said that a plane had hit the World Trade Centre and he said about this was his words this is an interview with Larry King on then CNN he said About 15 minutes after he was given the note about the first plane hitting the World Trade Center, he said, I felt a jarring thing.
	And it was the Pentagon being hit.
	On the other side of the building, it's a massive building, as far from Rumsfeld as you can get.
	By the way, that strike...
	Whatever it is, and I say it wasn't Flight 77 and I explain why in the book, was actually targeted at something called Wedge 1, which was an area of the Pentagon that had just been reinforced specifically to resist an attack like that.
	And if you are, just as a quick aside, if you are wanting to create maximum mayhem as terrorists against the great Satan as they would perceive it, then you are not going to park your plane into a place on the Pentagon which has just been reinforced specifically to defend against such an attack.
	You are going to strike the other side of the Pentagon Where all the military chiefs and Rumsfeld is.
	They didn't. Instead they went past the Pentagon and did a miraculous spiral, according to the official story, to hit that wedge.
	Anyway, Rumsfeld, therefore, from what he said, we can break this down with a timeline.
	The Pentagon was struck About 9.38, 9.40.
	Go back 15 minutes, Rumsfeld's 15 minutes, and what, you're hitting about 20 past 9?
	He claims that, therefore, at around 20 past 9, someone's walked into his office and handed him a note to say a plane's hit the World Trade Center, which struck the World Trade Center at quarter to nine.
	And they never mentioned another plane that hit the World Trade Center at three minutes past nine.
	So, then in 2004, a man called Richard Clarke, who was the counter-terrorism advisor in the Bush administration, he published a book called Against All Enemies, I think it was called, And he described what he was doing that morning after he heard about the first plane hitting.
	He said he raced to the White House and by about ten minutes past nine he had set up a teleconference between himself in the White House and the military chiefs in the Pentagon at the command centre.
	And he describes in the book how in this period after 10 past 9 on the screen in front of him in the command centre of the Pentagon is Donald Rumsfeld and General Richard Myers who claimed to have been on Capitol Hill while it was all going on.
	Why would Why Rumsfeld lie about what happened to him on 9-11 when clearly he was in the command centre all along, where you would expect him to be?
	And why would Myers lie about being on Capitol Hill when he was in the command centre at the Pentagon all along?
	Because, again and again, whether it's Dick Cheney, all of them, There is this common theme of cover stories that turn out not to be true until the Pentagon was hit to explain why there was a non-reaction.
	And what was happening all through the system is that people at NORAD, a place called Rome in New York State, and an area of NORAD known as NEEDS, the North East Air Defence Sector, who was the part of NORAD directly responding to the hijackings they were completely scrambled in terms of information and simulated stuff on their screens and misinformation so that they didn't know what the hell was going on and other parts of the system were stood down so that there was no reaction until the attacks were complete and then Then everything started to kick back in to what would normally happen.
	Because these attacks were allowed to happen because they were a problem reaction solution to justify all that's followed right up to present day.
	I'm told we're supposed to open up to the floor, and I've not even got to the whodunit bit.
	So what I'll do is I'll hope that one of you will ask whodunit.
	And I'll just ask one final question, which is, what do you think the response will be to the book?
	And aside of that, what do you think will be the most extreme response to it?
	Well, when people read the book, and people already have, and they're still pushing their chin back into place because you know I'm giving you one or two headlines here but the evidence is devastating and when someone asks me a question soon who did it you'll see that it's going to be highly highly controversial and You know, I'm going to be demonized probably by the usual suspects.
	And I knew that.
	But you know, if you care about the truth, then you must not care about consequences.
	Because fear of consequences is the prison cell that so many people live in.
	you have something you know should be communicated but you think what are the consequences for me of doing it and most people will allow those consequences to persuade them that actually the consequences are worse than actually going with what they believe to be right I don't do consequences, I don't think of consequences I just do what I believe to be right And so that's why I put this book out.
	When you read it you'll see why I'm saying what I'm saying.
	It is highly controversial but just happens to be true.
	And I'm going to be demonised and there is a chance for sure that there may even be attacks set up on certain people that will be blamed on the book Those attacks on those people, it's because those people were influenced by this book.
	That is a possibility, and you'll see what I mean by that when we get into the question of who actually did it.
	So anything's possible in reaction to what's in it.
	But I don't care about consequences for me.
	I care about the truth because we are going down a very dark road where civil liberties and freedom, freedom of expression are being deleted in the most hysterical tidal wave of censorship and I've described this book early on or at some point in any way It's like standing in a lift, an elevator, and the doors are closing.
	This is the doors closing of freedom.
	And this book is designed to put an arm through the doors and open them up again by saying what you're not supposed to say and exposing what you're not supposed to expose.
	So, you know, life could get bumpy.
	I don't care. I care about the truth because if we start censoring, self-censoring, what people need to hear, then it's over.
	Okay, what we'll do, we'll open it up to the floor then.
	My brother's got a microphone.
	I will just say, obviously for me, I've grown up with it in terms of the research and stuff.
	So obviously Dad will be researching constantly and we'll be having conversations over a beer about stuff.
	But having read the book, even I was like, my jaw was on the floor a hell of a lot during it, which I didn't expect it to be because I thought I've kind of grown up with it, you know.
	So it is amazing.
	I'm interested to see the response from people.
	It'll be bumpy, like my dad says, definitely.
	But who wants to ask who done it then?
	Yeah, go for it mate, yeah.
	Who done it? I thought we'd get to that question.
	OK, I'll give you the headline story.
	Because it's a long story and the second half of the book tells this story in detail.
	What the demonizers are going to do is tell everyone that I'm saying that 9-11 was done by Jewish people.
	They're going to say that I'm calling it a Jewish plot.
	It is the last thing that I'm saying and I'm going to explain why.
	And I say in the book actually no one needs to read this book more urgently than the Jewish community to see how they've been shafted monumentally.
	Not only recently but for a very very long time.
	Because Those that actually, for reasons I'll come to, were behind 9-11, hate Jewish people, have contempt for Jewish people, but what they do is hide within Jewish people to use them as a smokescreen to protect them from exposure.
	So, in brief, this is the story.
	In the 17th century, a man emerged, a Jewish man, a Sephardic Jewish man, at least he was to start with, called Sabbatai Zevi.
	He proclaimed himself the Jewish Messiah.
	And he gathered together a following that, and what I'm about to say has come from Jewish sources, by the way, I quote the Jewish sources about all this in the book.
	Because there are people in the Jewish community that know that what I'm about to say is true.
	And he gathered together a following of a million people.
	Now imagine that. A million people in the 17th century.
	Taking into account that today the Jewish population of the world is 0.2% of the world population.
	If you take the number of Jewish people in the world, it depends on how you define a Jewish person, but take a mean figure.
	It's about 16 million.
	16 million out of 7.7 billion.
	And the number of those that I'm identifying in relation to 9-11 is absolutely tiny.
	The vast majority have no idea What's in their midst.
	No idea what's been done in their name.
	None of it. And when people say it's a Jewish plot, they're actually playing into the hands of the people I'm going to talk about.
	Which is a death cult.
	A satanic death cult.
	Which actually hates Jewish people, as I said.
	And these Jewish people and Jewish sources, I quote, have said the same.
	So what Zabatai Zevi did was create a cult that in which they inverted everything in Judaism so if in Judaism a certain day was a fast day to what became known as Sabbateans it became a feast day and all the taboos in Judaism including for instance sex with children were not taboos in Sabbateanism because it was an inversion all these taboos were not only no longer taboos in Sabbateanism they were to be encouraged and people were pressed to do them because they had this extraordinary sales pitch for this cult which was the more evil you do basically the quicker God will come and sort the world out anyway eventually the guy Sabbatai Zevi was in the Ottoman Empire in Turkey and he was given a an ultimatum by the Sultan You either convert to Islam or basically you ain't going to be around very long.
	So Sabbatai, considering it, thought, I'll convert.
	But not really.
	And a lot of his followers converted to Islam.
	And they became known as Donma.
	Which is a word that means to turn.
	To convert.
	To convert. But they didn't convert.
	They continued to practice their Sabbateanism cult, this inversion of Judaism, while outwardly appearing to have converted to the Islamic religion.
	Just as an aside, but I do explain it in the book, some of these Donma Sabbatean cultists ended up as the Saudi royal family and that Saudi royal family in league with the British Empire introduced another Donma a bloke called Wahab to the Saudi royal family his daughter married into the Saudi royal family and from this Wahab guy came Wahhabism.
	This is the extreme head-chopping, hand-chopping religion practiced by the Donma Sabbatean fake royal family in Saudi Arabia and by ISIS Islamic State and all the other names.
	This is a created religion by the Sabbatean cult Then in the 18th century along came a man a Jewish guy at the start just like Sabbatai Zebi.
	His name was Jacob Frank.
	He came along and he claimed to be the reincarnation of Sabbatai Zebi and of the biblical patriarch Jacob.
	And he took this Sabbatean cult into new depths of depravity some Jewish writers and historians have in effect called him one of the most evil people in Jewish history but he weren't Jewish he was the Sabbatean and this cult basically became known as I call it in the book Sabbatean Frankism and All the paedophilia, the sacrifice of people in Satanism, all this stuff became part of the cult.
	And incest, all the stuff that I've written in my books for years is practiced by this cabal that controls the direction of human society.
	This was all practiced by the Sabbatean Frankists.
	Then, Jacob Frank got together with a guy called Meyer Amstel Rothschild, the founder of the Rothschild dynasty.
	The Rothschilds are Sabbatean Frankists, not Jewish.
	That's just the front.
	And They themselves got together with a guy called Adam Weishaupt who was a Jewish guy who converted to Catholicism and was educated by the Jesuits.
	Now this is what happened when Jacob Frank took this Sabbatean Frankism onto a new level.
	They became experts Going back to their Donma experience.
	In infiltrating other religions and other races and other societies.
	While posing as members of those religions and those societies.
	And Jacob Frank converted a very large number of Sabbateans into the Roman Church.
	Who outwardly appeared to be Roman Catholic.
	They weren't. They were Sabbatean infiltrators.
	Infiltration is the real calling card of this Sabbatean Frankist cult.
	And Sabbatean Frankism, its Bible is the Kabbalah.
	The mystical works of the Jewish belief system.
	And particularly one book in the Kabbalah called the Zohar.
	And Zohar means radiance or illumination and so you have Illuminati.
	And this Illuminati then started causing revolutions like the French Revolution caused mayhem all over the place and then it moved in on America and eventually around the world.
	And this Rothschild Led in many ways as the years passed, Sabbatee and Frankist cult was the force behind the creation of Israel.
	Of course the vast majority of Jewish people were sold this idea that it's your birthright and all that story but actually it was Sabbatee and Frankist that were behind it and they've controlled Israel ever since.
	And in a chapter in the book called Atlantic Crossing, I show how they moved in on America.
	Now, these people are not Jews.
	They're not Jewish. They are Sabbatean Frankists posing as Jewish.
	Which is why I say that no one needs to read this book more urgently than the Jewish community to see how they've been shafted.
	And like I say, I emphasize again...
	The vast majority of the sources that I quote in this story are Jewish sources from people who've investigated this Sabbatean Frankist takeover of their community.
	So let's move to 9-11.
	And in the understanding that Sabbatean Frankism Created and controls the Israeli intelligence and military intelligence network, Mossad, the domestic intelligence, Shin Bet, military intelligence of the Israeli defence forces, they are all fronts for these Sabbatean Frankists.
	Not Jewish people, Sabbatean Frankists, the cult, the death cult, I call it.
	Let's just look through, these are just a few headlines from 9-11.
	First of all, the entire criminal investigation of 9-11 was overseen by a ultra-Zionist guy called Michael Shertoff, who was head of the criminal division of the Justice Department.
	And by the way, when you go through an airport, and you go through a full body scanner if you don't take the pack down which of course people ought to they should thank Michael Schurtoff for that because he introduced them I might get to the story of how as we go along so he's controlling the whole investigation which was a non-investigation how many people know that in 2001 200 Israelis were arrested in America as part of an Israeli spy ring.
	140 before 9-11, 60 afterwards.
	And how many know that where the center of their operation was in Florida not least around a place in Florida called Hollywood not far from Miami was the same area that the majority of the 9-11 hijackers were operating at the same time Mohammed Attar among them who was actually in the same street as some of these Israeli people that were picked up for this spiring Why have we heard of them?
	Whatever happened to them?
	Michael's shirt off let them go and they return to Israel.
	How many people know that on the morning of 9-11 a lady in an apartment block looking out across the river to the burning first tower Notice five people, five men, with a white van, filming the tower, and high-fiving and whooping and cheering as they were doing so.
	They were described of Middle Eastern appearance.
	She reported what happened to the police.
	Eventually the police catch them up.
	Well they were of Middle Eastern appearance.
	They were five Israelis.
	Two of which were known to the police as Mossad operatives.
	And they said that they were there they were taking pictures of each other as they were whooping and high-fiving to record the event.
	Well how did you know it was going to happen?
	Because in the Postscript at the end of the book I mention a Freedom of Information Act request which produced after the main book was finished recently some pictures that were taken from these five Israelis that became known as the Dancing Israelis that they took of each other with the tower in the background on September the 11th And they tried to make them as difficult as possible when the authorities released these pictures because they weren't the decent copies they were basically photocopied versions of the pictures but the buildings showed the location.
	And one of these pictures was taken on September the 10th which supports reports by residents at this block this residential block who say they saw one of these dancing Israelis in that area around that building the day before and then the next day when the tower was being hit the first tower was the only one who had been hit at the time they were seen some say they were there before Somehow they were there knowing what was going to happen.
	They were arrested.
	They failed lie detector tests.
	They were kept for 71 days.
	And then Michael Shertoff let them go back to Israel.
	And they were working at what was clearly a Mossad front.
	called Urban Moving Systems in New Jersey not far from where they were seen and this was headed by a guy called Dominic Souter an Israeli and the FBI interviewed him about what it was what was going on and what it was all about and they said we're going to come back and give you a second interview well they didn't because he was on a plane to Israel straight away And I emphasize again, as you'll see in the book in detail, key areas where this spy ring was operating, and these dancing Israelis were part of it, clearly, was where these 9-11 hijackers were operating.
	So let's now go to Larry Silverstein.
	Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy bought the lease of the World Trade Center towers.
	The deal was finalized in July 2001, weeks before the attacks.
	And the deal was done with the ultra-Zionist control, the head of it was an ultra-Zionist guy called Lewis Eisenberg, New York Port Authority.
	Which agreed for the Twin Towers to go into private hands for the first time in their history.
	And the decision to sell them into private hands, i.e.
	to Silverstein, came from recommendations by a guy called Ronald Lorda, an ultra-Zionist of global significance, from the Estee Lorda family.
	who was the head of two organizations in New York at the time that were recommending privatization and they recommended the Twin Towers and Silverstein bought them he then, like I said earlier increased the insurance on the buildings in the case of a terrorist attack The man that insured him was called Morris Greenberg, an ultra-Zionist close friend of Henry Kissinger.
	I should also say that Silverstein was a close friend of Benjamin Netanyahu, so much so that he used to have a phone conversation with him every Sunday.
	This has been confirmed by a number of sources, including Haaretz, the Israeli newspaper.
	And Lowy knew Netanyahu, Ronald Lauder was a very close friend and funder of Benjamin Netanyahu and Lewis Eisenberg of the New York Port Authority that did the deal to sell them the lease of the towers was a close friend of Benjamin Netanyahu and Morris Greenberg Did the deal for the insurance, increased terrorism insurance, and then immediately sold it on to 24 insurance companies, which took the hit.
	Not Greenberg, he'd sold them on by the time of the attacks.
	Then you had the Control of security at the World Trade Center.
	I'll give you a sequence here which will lead me to that.
	In 1979 a guy called Issa Harrell who is known as the father of Israeli intelligence did an interview with a Christian Zionist journalist in 1979 and he said, predicted That Arab terrorists were going to attack the tallest building in New York because in Islamic belief a tall building was a phallic symbol and it would be an attack on the spirit of America.
	Which was a hell of a prediction.
	In the same year Benjamin Netanyahu, the friend of all these people involved with the buildings, started creating conferences, terrorism conferences, one in 1979 and another in 1984, and he wrote a book about it as well, which called for a war on terrorism And he talked about the need for pre-emptive strikes on terrorist countries.
	And all the things that have happened since 9-11.
	Then he became Prime Minister of Israel.
	And in 1996, a guy called Richard Pearl, an ultra-Zionist who had a significant job in the Pentagon at the time of 9-11...
	wrote a report for Netanyahu as Prime Minister called A Clean Break and this set out what Israel needed to do to secure what it wanted to achieve and this included removing Saddam Hussein from Iraq in a regime change And destabilizing Syria and other Arab countries and quote keeping or making as many inter-Arab conflicts as possible happen so you divided and ruled the whole Arab world.
	Then in 1997, in America, the following year, an organisation was created called the Project for the New American Century.
	One of its big assets was Richard Pearl, who wrote that Clean Break document.
	And others in the Project for the New American Century were Dick Cheney, who a few years later would be the 9-11 de facto president and official vice-president.
	Donald Rumsfeld, who would be 9-11 Defence Secretary.
	Paul Wolfowitz, a big ultra-Zionist, who would be his deputy, actually the real power in the Pentagon.
	Doug Zakheim, another ultra-Zionist, who at the time of 9-11 was the controller of the Pentagon and controlled the entire Pentagon budget.
	And also in there was a man called John Bolton.
	Who's in the news at the moment as we speak after his period as National Security Advisor to Trump.
	In 1998, this group wrote to then-President Clinton urging an invasion of Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein and the claim was that there was weapons of mass destruction In the year 2000, September, one year to the month before 9-11, the Project for the New American Century that was co-founded by two absolutely extreme Zionists called William Crystal and Robert Kagan produced a document and it called...
	For America to fight and decisively win, quote, multiple theater wars in the Middle East and regime change a series of countries as a result.
	These countries were Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Iran, also North Korea leading to regime change in China.
	And they said in this document, in September 2000, that this process of transformation, as they called it, this regime change list, would necessarily be slow, quote, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor.
	A few months later, the people that wrote that report said, And nine months after they came to power, America had, in September 2001, what Bush called The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century.
	As a result of that they started to justify the ticking off of this list of regime change countries.
	They started with Afghanistan but as I think I mentioned earlier within no time on the morning of 9-11 Ehud Barak A Prime Minister of Israel up to early 2001 and a head of the military intelligence in Israel at one point was on the BBC pointing out that Bin Laden and Afghanistan were basically behind it and sorting out Afghanistan was important in response.
	Then, as time went on, the list was ticked off.
	Saddam Hussein was removed.
	Then there was Gaddafi in Libya.
	This list went on. And the New York Times reported that on September 19th and 20th, right after 9-11, this same group of people on what was called the Pentagon Defense Policy Board Had met to plot the removal of Saddam Hussein from Iraq.
	That's September 19th and 20th after the attacks.
	Then in 2007, getting slightly out of the sequence, but I've got to come forward to go back.
	A guy called Clark, General Clark, who was a former...
	Supreme Commander of Forces with NATO, was interviewed on an internet show in America, an alternative show called Democracy Now.
	And he described what he experienced immediately after 9-11.
	He said he went to the Pentagon and he met Rumsfeld and he met Wolfowitz and then he went downstairs and he met A general from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the military level control ahead of the hierarchy in the Pentagon.
	And this general told him that they were going to invade Iraq.
	This is days after 9-11.
	And Clark said, Wesley Clark, he said, why are we invading Iraq?
	Are they involved in 9-11?
	He said, well, we don't think so.
	No, no evidence.
	But we're going to invade Iraq.
	That's what they've said. So he goes away and he comes back, he said, a few weeks later, by which time America has invaded Afghanistan, which, of course, had to be planned long before 9-11 to make that happen.
	And he said to the same general, I thought we were going to invade Iraq.
	What's happening?
	He said, it's worse than that, sir.
	He said he pulled a piece of paper out of his desk and he said, we just had this from upstairs, Rumsfeld's office, We're going to invade seven countries in five years.
	And he reeled off what those countries were.
	And among them was Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, etc.
	The very countries named by the ultra-Zionists created and controlled.
	I say Israeli, Sabatine, Frankist controlled.
	Project for the new American century.
	And when you then look at what followed, you had Bush, Republican, and Tony Blair, Labour, that ticked off Iraq, and Afghanistan first, then ticked off Iraq.
	Now they lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to justify the invasion.
	Why? Iraq is on the list, and there's no reason to invade it, so you make one up.
	Simple as that. Then, Blair goes, Bush goes, in comes now Bush's opponent, the Democrat Barack Obama, and in comes David Cameron, Conservative.
	Different party to Blair, officially.
	And you'd think, oh, we're going to go on a different road.
	No, what do they do?
	They remove, with NATO... Gaddafi from Libya.
	Another one off the list of the project for the new American century.
	Then they start the upheavals and civil war, talking about the American-British military intelligence, etc., in Syria.
	And then they go and in comes Donald Trump and he starts targeting Iran, another one on the list.
	With pressure, thank God he's just been fired, from John Bolton.
	He's National Security Advisor, who's never seen a country he didn't want to bomb.
	He's put on, we must have war with Iran, we must have war with North Korea.
	All the ones on this list.
	We must take the troops out of Syria.
	On the list. John Bolton was a member of the Project of the New American Century when that document was written and that list compiled in September 2000.
	It's gone on right to present day.
	So, then we come back to control of the World Trade Center's security.
	In 1987, an organisation, a group called Atwell Security, that was a subsidiary of the company of a guy called Shawl Eisenberg, major player in Israeli intelligence and covert operations.
	Who ran a company called Zim Shipping.
	Zim Shipping. Yeah, probably true.
	That's probably true. Zim Shipping.
	Yeah, probably the first time I was right.
	Vacated their offices in the World Trade Center a week before 9-11 and broke the terms of their lease to do so.
	And this subsidiary of Schaal-Eisenberg's company was called Atwell Security.
	And it was controlled and peopled by agents of the Israeli intelligence.
	Military intelligence, domestic intelligence, Shin Bet, Mossad, etc.
	And they bid for The contract to take over security at the World Trade Center.
	And they got it. And they got it from the ultra-Zionist-controlled New York Port Authority, again, of the time.
	The contract was then dropped because it was found that the president of Atwell Security had used a false name in the whole contractual process and he was really a guy called Avrim Shalom who was a major player in Israeli intelligence and he had had to resign in that role for overseeing ordering the murder of two wanted Palestinians by bashing them On the skull with stones.
	So the contract was dropped and they lost control of the security of the World Trade Center.
	However, in 1993, so they obviously wanted control of that building for some reason.
	Lots of security firms in America could have done it.
	And by the way, the negotiator on behalf of Atwell in America Was an Israeli intelligence agent who worked with Issa Harrell, the guy that predicted the tallest building in America being attacked by Arab terrorists.
	In many roles, one of them the kidnapping of a guy called Adolf Heichmann in South America after the war, in 1960 I think it was, and taking him back to be executed in Israel.
	Anyway, In 1993 came the World Trade Center bombing.
	And as a result of that, the New York Port Authority decided that it had to revamp its security.
	And so they gave the contract to do it to an ultra-Zionist security company called Kroll.
	And at that same time in 1993, someone else bought into Kroll as a partner.
	And his name was Morris Greenberg, the friend, close friend of Henry Kissinger, who had done the deal, who would do the deal, rather, for Silverstein to get his upgraded insurance when he bought the World Trade Center lease.
	So through that period from 1993 to 2001, there was Israeli...
	Ultra-Zionist control of the World Trade Center security.
	And of course once Silverstein got hold of the lease weeks before 9-11 they had complete control of the building.
	And then along came the attacks and every morning every weekday morning Larry Silverstein would be found In a restaurant high up in one of the towers called the Window on the World restaurant where he was meeting clients for breakfast.
	He had working breakfast there every day.
	Virtually every day of the working week.
	Except on 9-11.
	When he said his wife had got him a dermatology appointment and absolutely insisted he had to go there.
	So thanks to...
	The dermatology appointment.
	He wasn't in a restaurant where he would normally be that day and everyone in the restaurant when the building was hit didn't survive.
	His two children or two of his children that worked with him on running the World Trade Center they were running late that day because they were normally in the restaurant as well most days meeting clients.
	And the overseeing of the investigation into what happened was overseen by Michael Shertoff, this ultra-Zionist guy.
	And the last thing they wanted was for it to come to court And the evidence to have an open court to be played out, because as people will see in the book, I'm just knocking around a few headlines tonight, the evidence to come out is phenomenal.
	The last thing they want is a public forum, a courtroom to do it.
	So what they did is they offered to the families of the victims...
	In all their different forms.
	Compensation. And the compensation came with a rider, an agreement that they wouldn't take civil action.
	And the man overseeing that compensation to victims' families, etc.
	was a guy called Kenneth Feinberg.
	An ultra-Zionist lawyer who also decided in 2008 who got executive bailout compensation after the economic crash and who didn't.
	But close to 100 families said you can stick your compensation we want our day in court so the evidence can be examined.
	They were then passed over To another judge who ran the civil litigation of the families and presiding over as a judge.
	He was an ultra-Zionist called Alvin Hellestein.
	And he was described, even in the mainstream media here and there, as basically running, this is one of the quotes, a war of attrition on the families.
	So, one by one, they pulled out and accepted the compensation without going to court.
	And the last one caved in lost family in 2011.
	When reported in the New York Times, Hellerstein made yet another decision as part of the litigation, which basically made the last family realise we can't possibly win.
	And they took the compensation.
	So he made sure that none of them went to court.
	And these are a few headlines.
	I could go on with this stuff forever.
	So I talked earlier about...
	How the steel and the debris from the towers, the three of them, was whipped away to New Jersey scrapyards so it couldn't be examined to see what the hell happened.
	It was a Zionist transport company that took it to the scrapyards under GPS control.
	Tracking, because it was sensitive material.
	Sensitive material, it was then immediately cut up, put on ships to Asia to be smelted.
	And the scrapyards that did that were Zionist controlled.
	Zionist owned.
	And everywhere you look, a company called ICTS, or a subsidiary of that company...
	Controlled the airport security like who got on the plane and who didn't at Boston Logan Airport and at Newark, New Jersey.
	This is the same airport security company that ran security at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport when the shoe bomber got on with a bomb in his shoe and And the same company that ran Skipol Airport Security, when the underwear bomber got on, apparently, according to people that witnessed it, without a passport.
	And as a result of the underwear bomber incident, where his pants caught fire, Michael Shertoff, who...
	Ran the non-investigation of 9-11 and then became head of Homeland Security and by the way also wrote the Patriot Act which was a freedom busting act that was introduced in the wake of 9-11 justified by 9-11.
	He immediately after the underwear bomber incident was doing the round of the news programs in America calling for The introduction of full body scanners at all airports so that they could see if anyone has a bomb in their underpants, basically. What he didn't say in those interviews is that his company represented the company that made the bloody scanners.
	And wherever you look in that 9-11 story, There is a Zionist, ultra-Zionist owned company or ultra-Zionist individual personality in key positions throughout.
	And you put all that lot together the fact that there's very clear sequence pushing since 1997 and earlier, but we can pick it up there.
	For a war on terror, targeting particular countries for a regime change.
	And then you have the very 9-11 atrocity that justified and made possible all that they wanted.
	And the fact that there is Israel first people all over the 9-11 atrocity.
	From the spy rings and dancing Israelis to the person that oversaw the whole thing, etc., etc.
	The idea that Israel was not involved in 9-11 is utterly insane, but it was not a Jewish plot.
	It was a Sabbatean, Frankist, death cult plot that To advance an agenda of global control that this cult and other aspects of it outside of Israel has been pursuing decade after decade after decade after decade.
	And what this Sabbatean Frankist cult has set up and I expose this in detail in the book is a network a global network of I call them hate groups because their their goal is to make people hate their targets and this network I refer to as the anti-semitism industry and the protection racket What it does is stop investigation and exposure of what this Jew-hating cult is doing by targeting and labeling anyone that gets even mildly close as an anti-Semite.
	And it's nothing to do with protecting Jewish people from discrimination.
	It is about protecting the Sabbatean Frankist cult and the Israeli government which is controlled by this cult from legitimate investigation and exposure.
	And proof very clearly that it's not about protecting Jewish people is that if you are a Jewish person and you are challenging the behaviour of Israel thus by definition in terms of its government military this cult Then you are abused by this protection racket more fiercely than non-Jewish people are.
	Why? Because it's easy to label someone an anti-Semite who isn't Jewish.
	Not so easy, though they try, bizarrely, to label someone who's Jewish an anti-Semite.
	So Jewish people that challenge what is going on are considered more dangerous and therefore get more abused.
	There are people who've been thrown out of the British Labour Party for being anti-Semitic who are freaking Jewish.
	There's one guy, I mention him in the book, a guy called Chilson who served as a conscript forced in the Israeli army fought in the war with Lebanon in 1982 stayed on and worked for the army as a liaison with foreign journalists showing them around and all this stuff and then realised how the Palestinians were really treated came to Britain, left Israel And was looking for a vehicle to express his contempt for how the Palestinians were being treated.
	And he thought, the Labour Party, I'll join that.
	That man who was born in Israel, served in the Israeli army and had relatives that were in the concentration camps was expelled from the Labour Party for anti-Semitism.
	In other words, criticizing Israel.
	And they've just introduced, and in the end, at the core, it will be the Sabbatean Frankist cult, a massively expanded definition of anti-Semitism.
	First of all, anti-Semitism is a complete misnomer because Semitic refers to a group of languages in the Middle East, the overwhelming vast majority of which are actually Arabic languages.
	But anyway, what they call anti-Semitism, definition...
	And the expanded definition has gone from discriminating against Jewish people because they're Jewish, which is of course reprehensible and childlike and ridiculously stupid, to including criticism of Israel and Zionism.
	And that has been brought in to expand the definition of antisemitism so more and more people...
	Can be labelled and demonised as anti-Semitic to stop them uncovering what the hell is going on through this cult that he's not Jewish.
	He hates Jewish people.
	So you can see the potential for demonising me as a result of some of this stuff.
	And I'm just giving you some headlines there.
	All the facts and the Jewish sources are in the book for this stuff.
	To demonise me.
	Because they're going to lie about it.
	What they're going to say is, I'm saying it's a Jewish plot.
	It's the last thing I'm saying.
	And I say to Jewish people, for goodness sake, please read the book and see how you're being shafted in so many ways by this cult, which is posing, as its usual modus operandi, as a protector of Jewish people.
	Right, we'll open up to the floor again.
	Anyone else got a question?
	Yes, sir? The last book, Everything You Need to Know, was massively explosive.
	Not on the scale of this, obviously.
	But I remember you said in an interview, you sent copies of that book to every major media organisation in the country.
	Right. And they all ignored it.
	Yeah. Do you think this book will be ignored as explosive as it is anyway?
	That's a very interesting question.
	If people didn't get that online, the question was, I sent copies of my last book, Everything You Needed Up Had Ever Been Told, which was explosive, to all the major media organizations, and they completely ignored it.
	I'll tell you something I found interesting.
	When they, because of course I was banned from Australia, basically on the say-so of one guy, an ultra-Zionist called Divi Abramovich, who runs a man and a dog organisation called the Anti-Defamation Commission.
	And what they do is they prove you're right by saying you're wrong.
	No, you can't say that people like him have too much power.
	And because you've said that, I'm going to have you banned from Australia.
	You know what I mean? It's like, well, you've proven me right then.
	Anyway. But the media ignored it.
	But like I said, I'll tell you what I found interesting.
	Is I wrote a book in the 1990s.
	I wrote it in 94, came out in 95.
	And it was called...
	And the truth shall set you free.
	And in that book I mention almost in passing then that there was a very high number of Jewish people involved in the Russian Revolution.
	Now remember that is 1994 I wrote that came out in 95.
	When they're trying to demonize me as an anti-Semite They quote from that.
	They don't quote from much more recent books which factually expose so much that they wouldn't want exposed.
	They don't quote from them. It's like, well, just forget those exist.
	Please. We'll quote from this one.
	And there is a chance that they'll try to ignore it, absolutely.
	Because the more they attack me for it, the more People will be aware of it and say, well, what is happening for?
	Let's have a look at this. And by the way, on that thing about the Russian Revolution, it's an interesting point.
	I quote this in the book.
	As long ago as 1920, literally in the wake of the Russian Revolution, There was an English writer who went back to the original documents of the revolution and he found an extraordinary number of Jewish people involved in the revolution.
	It was an extraordinary percentage from the original documents.
	And so, when you mention that, people would say, Syria's an anti-Semite.
	But there's another question to answer here, or to ask here, which relates to what I've just said.
	And it's this.
	Given that there were so many Jewish people involved in the Russian Revolution at the core, how come that after that revolution, Jewish people were subject to horrific treatment in Russia?
	Why? That's the question.
	And the answer is this, in effect.
	Those Jewish people involved in the Russian Revolution, which all connects into the Rothschilds, all this Sabbatean Frankism that I'm talking about, were not Jewish, overwhelmingly.
	They were Sabbatean Frankists who hate Jews.
	And so when they get power, what did they do in Russia?
	They targeted Jewish people.
	This is the big penny drop of what's actually going on.
	What they do is they pose as a certain belief system, if you like, within the Jewish community, within the Islamic community, within Roman Catholic community.
	They pose as those people, and people within that community think you're one of us.
	But actually they're running a completely different agenda using those communities as a front to hide behind.
	And they don't want this stuff known to the public.
	This is why these Jewish sources that I quote in the book for all this were marginalized and found it very difficult to get this stuff out to a wider audience.
	And because I have a public profile and because basically I don't give a shit You know, people should never underestimate the power of not giving a shit.
	Because the power to control the population is to get the population to give a shit.
	That's where fear of the consequences comes, in terms of, I know it's right, I know I should be putting this out, but what are the consequences for me?
	Because they give a shit.
	I don't.
	I'm consciousness. Like, we're all consciousness.
	I'm having a brief experience in a narrow band of frequencies we call the world, and then I'm going to explore forever, forever, as we all do.
	What happens to me in this brief three score years and ten?
	Yeah, just an experience.
	And if taking consequences and abuse is what's necessary to get this information out, well, fair enough, we'll do it.
	Because the alternative is not getting the information out, and for me, that is not an alternative.
	So, there is a chance that they'll ignore it, and there is another chance, especially if the book starts to get out, and I tell you what, the interest of this book has been like no other, right?
	Phenomenal. Right into mainstream society.
	They may think, no, we can't ignore this one.
	And then they'll go for demonisation, overwhelmingly.
	And once again, I can't...
	I won't give a shit. I've been demonised and abused for 30 years.
	In one ear and out the bloody other to me.
	I'm interested in people seeing what this network doesn't want them to see.
	And if that's consequences to me, it's consequences to me.
	And, you know, be another one to belong tomorrow.
	It'd be interesting to see, actually, what the reaction is.
	It's impossible to call, really.
	Okay, anyone else? Have you read Judy Wood's book about the towers disappearing and the energy weapon being used for the main ones?
	Have I read the Judy Wood book Where Did the Towers Go?
	Yes I have and I cover that in the book and funnily enough in Alice in One Land and the World Trade Center disaster, which I published in 2002, there is a section there that talks about could directed energy weapons, as they're now called, have been used?
	And Judy Wood makes a very good case.
	I outline it and let people make their own mind up.
	But what we should understand is, and I've been banging on about this for decades, Is that there is a cutting edge of technology that we see in the public arena.
	And we think that's the cutting edge of technology.
	Oh, bloody hell no.
	These people are not working with the level of technology that we see.
	They are working with a technology that's way beyond that.
	But even now, this technology that is being talked about, possibly being a reason the towers came down as they did, Directed energy weapons is now coming more and more into the public arena.
	And if you work on the basis of technology that we see now, and we think is cutting edge, was actually known about way back on the inside, then all this energy weapon stuff was available in 2001.
	And the idea is that these directed energy weapons, basically they break up the structure of matter And what they would do to a building like the World Trade Center is they would literally turn it to dust.
	And we all remember the phenomenal clouds of dust that is one of the most shocking sights of the towers coming down.
	But anyway, that's in the book so that people can see that.
	I've mentioned Operation Northwoods tonight, haven't I? You haven't, but we've got one more question.
	I was actually going to steal it myself and ask about the remote control planes, which is very, very interesting.
	Right. Well, I'm going to do two things.
	I'm going to do Operation Northwoods and I'm going to do the remote control planes because that brings in another...
	They didn't do what?
	I'll come to that in a second.
	Operation Northwoods. The reason I asked, have I said it tonight, is because I did an interview for three hours earlier today.
	Did I mention it in that one?
	I haven't mentioned it in this one. Operation Northwoods was basically the plan for 9-11 in 1962.
	In the summer before 9-11, A former investigative producer with ABC in America, a guy called James Banford, produced a book on the National Security Agency and in researching that book he came across official documents in the American archive, not conspiracy theory, actual documents Which had been known about in other less high profile ways before.
	But he really brought them to public attention.
	And this described Operation Northwoods.
	And this was the plan.
	It was during the Kennedy era presidency.
	And in the end it turns out that Kennedy put a stop to it.
	We go back to the Joint Chiefs of Staff in the Pentagon, which were headed on 9-11 by General Richard Myers, who said he was on Capitol Hill when he was on a telescreen from the Pentagon.
	And the Joint Chiefs of Staff were headed in 1962 by a guy called Len Nintzer.
	And at the time, they wanted to remove Castro from Cuba.
	Actually, this story will bring us into remote control planes, won't it?
	And so this was the plan, all in the official documents, that they were going to set up terrorist attacks in major American cities like New York and Miami, which the military were going to do, And they were going to blame them on Cuban terrorists.
	They were going to sink American shipping and blame them on Cuban attacks.
	And this is another thing.
	It's all described in the document, which takes us to 9-11.
	One of the plans, detailed, was that they would pick a flight from an East Coast airport that would take, as part of its normal commercial route, would take the plane over Cuba at a very high altitude, obviously. And the document said that they were going to With, quote, carefully created aliases.
	And then the plane would fly, as part of a normal commercial flight, think 9-11, down to Florida, across Florida on its way across Cuba, and a drone, a remotely controlled plane, of the same type painted in the colours of the same airline would take off from Eglin Air Force Base in Florida would meet up with the plane that left the airport so basically they become almost one blip on the radar which in 1962 was less sophisticated than it was in 2001 And the drone would replace the plane that left the airport.
	The plane that left the airport would then be landed at Eglin Air Force Base and the passengers would be taken off.
	The drone would be flown across Cuban airspace all in the document where it would be exploded by radio signal.
	And it says in the document that we will...
	Wait for the international aviation authorities to tell us that the plane had gone down to give more credibility to the fact that we knew nothing about it.
	And they were going to blame the plane coming down on an attack by Cuban forces to justify an invasion of Cuba.
	It's all in the official record.
	Operation Northwoods it was called.
	And what we had at 9-11 was a very much more expanded version of that when the attack was set up to justify the invasions that are followed that were listed before 9-11 happened.
	Now, that's a very interesting thing because in 1962 They had the technology to fly a remotely controlled plane of considerable size of commercial aircraft over Cuba.
	Remote control technology of aircraft has been known since back in the 50s and it's my view, and I explain in the book why, That the planes that left the airports on 9-11 were not the planes that hit the buildings and crashed in Pennsylvania.
	Because of the war games and the simulation over live and all the dots that were going on to do with the war games and the simulated planes, changing planes was a doddle That morning.
	And people, and I quote them in the book, who witnessed the crash of Flight 175 into the South Tower with a big fireball, described the plane not in terms of a commercial 767, but like a military plane.
	Of the same type, because they military used planes like that, 767s and stuff like that, they did that anyway.
	And interestingly, pilots for 9-11 Truth, which are commercial pilots, some of which flew those actual planes, that got together to challenge the official story, because they say all the aviation part of the story is ridiculous, it's not possible. Do you know the guy, they say, flew Flight 77 into the Pentagon with a spiral turn that these pilots say they could not have done was a man called Hani Hanjur.
	That's the official story.
	Annie Handjaw was banned from hiring a one-engine plane six weeks before 9-11 because he was so bloody incompetent and dangerous.
	Somehow he manifested that ability in six weeks.
	Ludicrous. Annie Handjaw was no more at the controls of Flight 77 than I was.
	And what these pilots say, because...
	At lower altitudes, where the air is thicker and the air pressure is greater, they have to do slower speeds than they would at high altitude, because if they didn't, the stability of the structure would start to come apart.
	And these pilots, and I saw in the book in detail, Looked at the speeds that Flight 11 and Flight 175 were supposed to be doing at very low altitude as they hit the buildings.
	And they looked at the strength, stability of those aircraft, 767s, commercial version of 767s.
	And they concluded that at those speeds, at that altitude...
	Those planes would have been, A, unflyable.
	As one pilot described it, it would have been like driving a car at 150 miles an hour and parking it in a one-car garage without hitting the sides.
	That's what it would have been like.
	They went on simulators to try to recapture...
	The possibility of doing it, they found they couldn't do it.
	But what they did say was that if they were strengthened versions of the 767, which they used in the military, not least in refuelling aircraft, then those aircraft would have been able to fly at those speeds and that altitude without falling apart.
	And So, for me, the planes that hit the buildings were remotely controlled.
	And the planes that took off were not the planes that hit the buildings.
	Now, it would be so easy to prove that they were the same planes.
	Piece of cake. Every time there's an air crash...
	The investigators do a number of things every time, and one of them is this.
	They take the parts that are found, and all these parts, particularly parts they call time-change parts, they're parts of an aircraft that have to be changed, even if there's nothing wrong with them, they have to be changed by regulation at certain periods.
	They all have serial numbers on them.
	And when those parts are changed, the serial number of the part going into the plane is logged in the maintenance log of that aircraft.
	So what they do is they get the parts, they look at these serial numbers, they check them off against the log of the aircraft that they think it is, and they prove, yes, they're the same codes, this is that aircraft.
	They do it every time. Except on 9-11.
	They didn't do it on 9-11.
	And I know this for a fact because there was a Freedom of Information Act request to the FBI to produce the documentation of that process being done with the 9-11 planes.
	The FBI replied, that documentation does not exist because that process was not done, and they said it wasn't done because there was no question as to the identity of the planes.
	When you read the book, you'll see there's massive questions about the identity of the planes.
	So, it's a conspiracy theory that they weren't the same planes.
	Okay! So why didn't you prove it by doing what he's done with every other air crash?
	Because they weren't the same planes that hit the building and crashed in Pennsylvania.
	Maybe a bit more likely that one, but not the ones that hit the buildings that left the airports.
	Another thing. The first thing that pilots are supposed to do when there's a hijacking is Is punch in a four-digit code in their aircraft next to them.
	Bang, bang, bang. That's how long it takes.
	Bang, bang, bang, bang. First thing they're supposed to do.
	Not one of the pilots in any of the four aircraft on 9-11 punched in the hijack code.
	Which is the first thing they're supposed to do.
	None of them. No one can explain that.
	Very quickly on some of the phone calls...
	Another thing. What happened is it was said that passengers were making calls from the plane on cell phones.
	On the planes on cell phones.
	Particularly like 93.
	Like 77 etc.
	And then it was pointed out That cell phones didn't work at the altitudes that those planes were flying when those calls were made.
	So the story changed.
	This is another thing you find with the 9-11 story.
	When they're caught out, they just change the bloody story.
	So, what they then said was, oh, no, they were made on air phones.
	No, they weren't cell phones, they were air phones, which were...
	I used one myself once, about the same period.
	And they're on the back of the seats and they could connect you to the ground.
	Very, very bloody expensive, but they connect you to the ground.
	And it was said that a CNN contributor, envisioned contributor, called Barbara Olsen, Called her husband in the Justice Department, a guy called Ted Olsen, who was the Solicitor General in the Bush administration, from Flight 77, and told him what was going on.
	And from that apparent conversation came the whole story about box cutters.
	And it was said, first of all, that And then it was pointed out that she couldn't have called from a cell phone at that altitude.
	So then suddenly she called from...
	Oh no, she called from an air phone.
	That explains it. And then as I show in the book, American Airlines, which is what Flight 77 was, American Airlines 757s had removed and disconnected the air phones from 757s by 2001.
	So there were no bloody air phones on the plane.
	Also... The record of calls both from Barbara Olsen to the Justice Department and the Justice Department receiving those calls doesn't exist.
	The calls weren't made.
	And then you have a guy called Tom Burnett who called his wife from Flight 93.
	What happened was that when she received the call, his cell phone number came up on her phone.
	He's calling her on a cell phone from the plane.
	The official story says, well, of course, someone was because his cell phone came up.
	According to the flight data recorder, When that call on the cell phone was made, the plane it was made from was flying at between 34,000 and 40,000 feet.
	You're never going to make a cell phone call from there.
	It's impossible. And when that was pointed out, the FBI changed the story.
	They said he called from an air phone.
	Right? Which was still in United Airlines planes at the time, which 93 was.
	But he didn't. He called from a cell phone.
	At that altitude, explain that.
	And then you had Todd Beamer.
	And he talked to a...
	He was on Flight 93.
	He talked to a Verizon supervisor called Lisa Jefferson for a long time from the plane, as he said.
	She didn't know if it was Todd Beamer or not.
	Never met him. And he called from an air phone.
	And he was the guy who is quoted as saying, though there's great doubt about it when you look at the evidence, let's roll, which became the big way that they promoted American response in the Middle East, let's roll.
	And she was first of all staggered that the phone connection didn't Disappear, because she said, air phone calls all around her were just disappearing and, you know, breaking up, going off, disconnecting.
	But this one just continued and continued.
	Not only that, she stayed on the line.
	She's a supervisor. She knows whether the line's open or not.
	Because, as she said, when the line is broken...
	It makes a particular noise and you know the connection's gone.
	But this line stayed open.
	And it stayed open for a long time after Flight 93 was supposed to have crashed.
	And these air phone systems get their power from the aircraft.
	So as it crashed, it's all open.
	Obviously. But the line stayed open.
	Another family who were on the line with someone else on that plane, their line also stayed open for a long, long time after the plane was supposed to have crashed.
	And Todd Beamer, who was on Flight 93, who talked to, it said, this Lisa Jefferson at Verizon, his cell phone was used 19 times to make outgoing calls to After the plane was supposed to have crashed.
	So, given that I've talked for a couple of hours here, and I have absolutely scratched the surface of what's in this book in terms of demolition of the official story, and also, I've only scratched the surface on the story of who did it.
	And you can see that even from what I said tonight is explosive stuff and makes the official story completely untenable.
	And then you think that everything those people wanted before 9-11, they got because of 9-11.
	And the real reason those attacks happened becomes clear.
	I dedicate the book both to the people who died on 9-11 and their loved ones left behind, and also to all those who died in the war on terror justified by 9-11 and their loved ones left behind.
	And when you see the scale of contempt That those behind 9-11, who covered up 9-11, continue to do so, have for those people.
	You can begin to appreciate the level of psychopathy, the level of psychopath that we are dealing with.
	People who would, for political ends, Pepperbomb entire countries of civilians.
	Are we going to really believe that they would have any compunction about 3,000 dead people on 9-11?
	To this level of psychopath, they are just fodder in their game of absolutely no importance.
	The only thing that's important is what they achieve by doing it.
	And that's why I say I don't care.
	If we don't stand up and look this death cult in the eye and refuse to blink then it will go on and complete what it set out to achieve.
	And what I do in the last two chapters is look at where this death cult wants to take us from here.
	And it is in the complete control of Of human perception by connecting the human brain to AI. This death cult is behind that.
	The same death cult behind 9-11 is behind that.
	It's behind the introduction of 5G without any independent tests.
	It's behind Silicon Valley.
	Silicon Valley. The death cult Sabbatean Frankists own Silicon Valley.
	And they're moving and they're creating another Silicon Valley as well, somewhere else in the world, which I expose in the book.
	And what is Sabbatean Frankist Silicon Valley doing now?
	It's embarked on an hysterical extreme tidal wave of censorship and To stop the exposure of Sabbatean Frankism.
	So this cult is not only doing what it's doing and did what it did on 9-11, it's now controlling its own exposure through Google, through Facebook, through YouTube, who are increasingly censoring those that are seeking to expose what's going on So it's doing it, and it's blocking the, overwhelmingly, more and more people get banned,
	the exposure of what it's doing.
	And that's why I say, you know, this book is the arm going through the elevator doors as they're about to close on human freedom.
	And how can consequences matter to you when we're at this point?
	At this point in the road, where if we don't take our power back now, this cult will create a nightmare.
	Both for people alive today, but even more so for our children and grandchildren.

▲