Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 1, 2019 - David Icke

19:40

The War On Alternative Everything - David Icke

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	🎵 People say I talk about some weird stuff, some far out
	stuff.
	But how about that chair that you're sitting in isn't solid?
	How weird is that?
	This reality is nothing like we think it is.
	When I saw what Ike is doing, I was a bit jealous of him.
	I was like, wow, look at what this guy is doing.
	I don't know if anybody else could do it but him, actually.
	We are in a period now where speaking your truth is not just important, it's utterly crucial to where humanity goes from here.
	The world needs renegades, and it needs them now.
	Now, there's obviously a war going on here against alternative everything, not least alternative medicine and those who are challenging the vaccine propaganda.
	And here's a story from this week.
	Quack, quote, skeptic Stephen Barrett exposed as agent provocateur working to discredit natural medicine on Wikipedia.
	It says in this story, his is one of the first names that pops up when performing a Google search for pretty much any topic related to natural health and wellness.
	His infamous Quack Watch disinformation site masquerading as a fact-checking source, which is what all these fact-checking sources are.
	Exactly that. Which, in actuality, exists solely to disparage and, quote, debunk all healing modalities that challenge or in any way threaten the doctrines of conventional medicine, which is the big pharma cartel.
	But Stephen Barrett and his brigade of status quo medical skeptics...
	Are anything but honest and science-based, Barrett himself having recently been exposed as an agent provocateur who's been working on behalf of the big pharma Deep State to taint the reputation of natural medicine, particularly on the fake news-driven Wikipedia website.
	Over the past year, Richard Gale and his team of sleuths from the Progressive Radio Network
	put many hours worth of legwork into digging up every detail they could to find about Barrett
	and his fellow anti-truth cronies, as well as their ongoing collusion with Wikipedia.
	They then compiled what they uncovered into 24 separate investigative stories,
	unveiling a treasure trove of truth about big tech and big pharma's relentless war against natural medicine.
	In its piece on Barrett and Wikipedia specifically, Progressive Radio Network investigators revealed that the,
	quote, sceptics have basically hijacked editorial control over all
	of the Wikipedia entries associated with things like chiropractic...
	acupuncture, traditional Chinese medicine, homeopathy, naturopathy, and many others forms of natural medicine, and altered them with descriptions basically pegging them as unsubstantiated quackery.
	Here's a quote from Richard Gale, one of the investigators.
	Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, and his sceptic comrades have covertly inculcated the encyclopedia.
	It's not. With medical ideologies, while relying upon slander to stage an offensive that would destroy the reputations of health disciplines they disagree with.
	I mean, Jimmy Wales, I wouldn't trust to tell me the time in a clock factory.
	And the whole Wikipedia scam, because that's what it is, is to hijack knowledge or information about everything.
	History, alternative medicine, everything.
	And I was...
	Reading one of their pages this week about vaccines.
	And they were talking about, well, it wasn't actually about vaccines.
	It was about a lady called Sherry Tenpenny, who's a doctor who opposes the vaccination scam.
	And when you read it, and she's talking about, or the page is talking about the fact that she opposes vaccines and looks at the connections with autism, it says that the connection has been trashed and shown to be not true, basically.
	Doesn't use that wording, but that's basically what it's saying.
	And this is what this story is talking about.
	The Wikipedia organization takes the official version of everything, and that's the point from which it reports everything.
	And I was watching a video a few days ago about one guy who has made an extraordinary, staggering number Of changes to Wikipedia text.
	And it's one man.
	And so Wikipedia is skewing...
	That's why it's called... It's basically, as it was called here, an encyclopedia.
	It's not. An encyclopedia worth the name...
	Puts information that is supportable by the facts.
	And where it can't do that, it says that it's an opinion.
	But instead now, vast, vast, vast numbers of people worldwide, when they want to know something about any subject, they go to Wikipedia.
	That's been the idea.
	That's the scam. They've hijacked information Research information in the same way that Amazon has hijacked retail and the book trade.
	Facebook etc has hijacked social media and Google and YouTube have hijacked videos and search engine results.
	And take a step back into the shadows.
	They're all controlled in the end by the same force.
	And it's very simple what's happening in terms of alternative medicine and vaccines.
	If you can't win the debate, don't have the debate.
	Shut it down. And this is what is happening with vaccinations now.
	And this war again...
	On information and people who challenge the official story of vaccines.
	There's a story this week on davidite.com, an article by John Rappaport, headed vaccines for profit and destruction.
	In what he says, whatever else modern medicine has wrought...
	Which has given birth to some impressive technical fixes and pinpoint trauma care.
	You know, a great friend of mine and a healing genius, a guy called Mike Lambert, lives down the road from me, runs the Shen Clinic.
	Get details at davidike.com.
	He said, you know, if you are in a life and death trauma situation, then You need a hospital because they are brilliant at that.
	You know, you get the paramedics coming out and stabilizing someone in a bad situation.
	They are brilliant. But once you then get into the whole treatment, then you are in very, very dodgy ground.
	Because what are the treatments, basically?
	They are the scalpel and the drug.
	Which are provided by what?
	And fund what? The big pharma cartel.
	Anyway, John goes on.
	Medicine, Rockefeller motivated.
	That's another story. If you go back about where this modern medicine came from, it came from the Rockefeller family.
	J.D. Rockefeller, the old tycoon.
	Makes disease and then treats what it has made.
	This is what vaccines are about.
	There is no other commercial operation on the planet that exceeds its reach or profit.
	Create an endless problem and then pretend to solve it.
	That's the secret mission.
	Make the solution a new problem, begging for more answers.
	That is the strategy.
	Reduce vitality and life force.
	That is the objective. Control of the disabled is far easier than control of the robustly healthy.
	And This is what is happening.
	I've done enormous amounts of research cumulatively over the years about vaccines.
	I've been doing some more this week or the last, yeah, probably the last week as I bring an end or bring to a conclusion the new book that I've been writing, which will be out in the autumn or the fall as you say in America.
	And it is extraordinary.
	What is going on and what it's all about.
	You see, you've got vaccines absolutely deluging the immune system of babies, even babies and young children, while these immune systems are still developing and completely kind of putting into their In a developing period, this toxic shite, including things like aluminium, which is a brain suppressant.
	And of course, there are other consequences as well, but just look at that.
	Those immune systems will never be what they could otherwise have been.
	And what does that allow?
	That allows more disease. What does more disease attract?
	More treatment. We are developing a deeply sick young generation compared with what's gone before.
	And vaccines are the very foundation of it.
	And, you know, of course, there are endless cases and examples of vaccines Children being given vaccines and then having very quick, sometimes immediate, but certainly very quick, consequences which are often life-changing.
	But what about all the things that happen ongoing in their lives that are not, on the face of it, connected to vaccines?
	Because their immune systems are not capable of defending them as they normally would.
	And again, immune system doesn't work properly.
	You get more disease, more disease, more treatment, more profits.
	And also control for what John Rappaport said there.
	It's easier to control sick people than well people.
	Because sick people...
	Obviously, it has an effect psychologically as well, as physically.
	So, always another scam.
	Beto. This is one of the candidates for president from the Democratic Party, the Soros Democratic Party.
	And he is saying that we have just 10 years remaining to save the planet from climate change, which is what Al Gore said in 2008.
	And we're all kind of still here.
	But he says 10 years.
	Ocasio-Cortez said, Who's not running for president because she's legally too young to do so, but she's still, in so many ways, driving the agenda of the Democratic Party, Soros Democratic Party.
	She says, we've got 12 years remaining to save the planet.
	And of course, the answer to saving the planet, according to these people, i.e.
	Soros and those who control Soros, is more centralization of power and dictatorship from the center.
	God, you shock me.
	So this is something that we're going to see more and more and more of.
	I've been writing since the 1990s about the global warming climate change hoax being an excuse to transform global society into a centralized state to, quote, save the planet.
	And here we are now having it...
	Put in front of us by this guy, Robert O'Rourke, known as Beto O'Rourke, and Ocasio-Cortez.
	They're nothing, if you study this stuff, they're nothing if not predictable.
	But there's another cause, you see.
	There's another cause of climate change.
	It's toxic masculinity.
	Yes, toxic masculinity is negatively impacting on the environment.
	See, this is a bit like, you know, the two-in-one vaccine or what they have in Britain.
	The six-in-one vaccine.
	Can you imagine that?
	A still-developing immune system gets six vaccines in one go.
	Anyway, this is a bit like that in...
	The sense that you take different aspects of the agenda or excuses for the agenda and you put them together.
	So now we have toxic masculinity, which is about reducing the masculine part of the human race, the masculinity in men, so you get them to be weak people, basically.
	And we're having testosterone levels falling around the world, as with sperm counts.
	And they are demasculizing, whatever word you might choose, the human race.
	And part of this is psychological.
	Part of it is chemical stuff.
	Estrogen, which you get in birth pills and stuff.
	Birth... They are peed into the water supply, been found in the water supply.
	And these and other chemicals, for instance, are changing fish from male to female, where the concentrations are high enough.
	And so on many, many levels, you've got chemicals in plastic Like plastic water bottles.
	They call them BPA. That contain chemicals which mimic estrogen, the female hormone.
	This is out there.
	You've got the same stuff on till receipts.
	Why? Because everyone touches them.
	And what you're looking at is this systematic...
	Demasculising, or probably a very new word there, of humanity.
	But it's also psychological.
	So you're having all these attacks on toxic masculinity to underpin the chemical attacks.
	Anyway, the latest front in the attack on masculinity is that it's causing climate change.
	Gender bias could have a link to climate change, a new study has suggested, with men who perceive their masculinity as threatened by a certain choice more likely to respond to perceived threats by making an environmentally bad choice.
	Forbes author Caroline Sentento Milton said that the study, co-authored by researcher Aaron Brough, From Utah State University.
	Crikey, I'll give that one a miss.
	And Utah State University, is that where they believe in Mormonism, is it?
	And very scientific.
	And fellows from another four academic institutions looked at the possible relationship between gender and sustainable decision-making.
	The researchers conducted seven experiments involving more than 2,000 participants and found that the environmentally responsible behavior, i.e.
	believing in climate change caused by human activity, tended to be perceived as more feminine by both those who engaged in it and those who observed it.
	Such feminine behavior was supposedly seen as the threat to the masculinity of a significant enough number of the male participants to lead researchers into suggesting gender stereotypes and their effects spread to things like environmentally responsible behavior.
	And irresponsible behaviour.
	Well, we got there in the end.
	It was a long journey. But yes, there is clearly a massive fundamental connection between masculinity and climate change.
	So we better reduce masculinity to save the world then.
	The world needs renegades.

▲