All Episodes
Previous Next
June 7, 2018 - David Icke
15:27
David Icke - Why I believe 9/11 was an inside job
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
🎵 Outro Music 🎵 🎵 Overwhelmed 🎵
🎵 Music 🎵 🎵 No mistake 🎵
🎵 Music 🎵 To the conspiracy theory of 9-11, one of the main things that got me thinking, well, hang on a minute, maybe there is some truth to it being an inside job, was the project for the new American century, which interestingly had, I think, was it John Bolton?
Was he one of the co-contributors towards it, which was basically setting out a plan for regime change to occur in places like Syria, Lebanon, North Korea, Iraq, Iran.
And lo and behold, those things seem to be happening.
Another thing that surprises me, people staring about conspiracy theories, is they're more than happy to accept that they were completely misled over the Iraq war and the smoking gun, and yet they can't ever imagine them ever lying ever again before or after.
But the project for the new American century in itself is a smoking gun.
Who benefits? Well, this is, again, this schizophrenia.
It's both public and journalistic schizophrenia.
The official story that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq when the people telling them knew they weren't.
I was writing in books at the time, actually, saying there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
They're making it up! But of course, that's not alike.
And then eventually it became clear that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
And so the invasion was based on a lie.
And of course, the catastrophe that's followed, we've all seen.
And then you've got this journalistic schizophrenia that can then say, yeah, okay, we were lied to about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
And then leave and leave again unquestioned claims about 9-11 that came from the very sane people that told them about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq when they knew that.
If they've lied to you, just take someone you know.
If they've lied to you blatantly about something, are you not going to question what else they've told you that might not be true?
Of course you will. It's the most natural thing in the world, but not in journalism when it comes to questioning official statements.
And then you mentioned the Project for the New American Century.
I mean, look at the personnel.
The personnel alone, you've got red flags everywhere in terms of what followed.
First of all, the Project for the New American Century, It was started in the 1990s, and it was co-founded by two people called Robert Kagan and William Crystal.
In the Project for the New American Century, where Dick Cheney would eventually become Vice President of the United States, President in Truth under George Bush, you had Donald Rumsfeld, who would be head of the Pentagon, Secretary of State for this fence, at the time that Cheney was in the White House.
You had Paul Wolfowitz, You had Doug Zakheim, who was the comptroller of the Pentagon at the time of 9-11, that controlled the entire budget of the Pentagon.
And by the way, it was announced under Zakheim's watch that the Pentagon had lost something like $2.5 trillion.
Imagine that. Where's that gone?
It's gone into these secret projects.
That's where it's gone, where there's no money trail leading back to government.
They announced that this 2.5 or whatever it was, it was close to that, trillion dollars had been lost on September the 10th, 2001.
It didn't get a lot of reporting for obvious reasons because of what happened very soon afterwards.
But that was just a coincidence, nothing to worry about.
And this group of people wrote a document which was published in September 2000 calling for a regime change imposed upon by the American military in a series of countries.
Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Iran, North Korea, China.
And then a short few months after that document was published, the people that wrote it came to power with the Bush administration in January 2001.
And nine months later, we had 9-11.
Now interestingly, in that document, a year to the month after the publication of that document, they say in the document that this process of regime change, what they call a process of transformation, would necessarily be slow Quote, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor.
And a year after the document was published, America had what President Bush called at the time the Pearl Harbor of the 21st century, which then justified this so-called war on terror, which then started this series of regime changes in the Middle East, which has led to the present catastrophe.
I track this every day.
It's my life.
But I have not, since September 11th, 2001, seen a single mainstream documentary that has questioned the official story of 9-11.
That is so ridiculous.
It has to be systematic rather than random chance.
Another interesting story in regards to that.
I've been putting on Facebook this documentary about 9-11 and I mentioned in Project for New America, a producer from the BBC actually got in contact with me saying, oh, I've watched it.
I don't believe any of it.
Anyone who thinks 9-11's an inside job is a head case and that I need to be careful.
You know, it's just a...
Rather odd, the attitude there.
But just to help readers, maybe, or listeners rather, open their mind in regards to conspiracy theories.
I mean, they do happen. History's shown they've happened.
I mean, Hillsborough is one near to home where that was kept quiet for 30 years, you know, until it was properly publicly exposed.
Although the evidence was already out there.
But it's the same with 9-11.
The evidence is already there.
It's just not being, the dots aren't being connected to show that the official story is just so full of holes it's untrue.
The thing about conspiracies, I mean, I just ask anybody, go online or find yourself a dictionary and look at the dictionary definition of a conspiracy.
It's basically two or more people getting together to conspire to manipulate an end.
Now, on that basis, the world is drowning in conspiracies.
But this is the point, you see.
What you do is, whatever you're doing, you don't want people to know.
And one of the ways you do this is by A, ridiculing anybody that says you're doing what you're doing, therefore conspiracy theorists are all nutters, and or you make it illegal.
Or you make it a form of racism.
So to say a person is doing what they're doing becomes racist.
It becomes hate speech.
When it's not, it's called journalism, uncovering what someone is doing.
So these techniques, because in the end, you see, it's a psychological game.
When there's a few of you, you can't control billions of people physically, although they want to do that with artificial intelligence.
But up to this point, you can't do it physically.
You've got to get control of the public perception, because the public perception then controls public behavior.
And therefore, control of information is why journalism, or lack of it, is so important.
Controlling what people see and hear dictates people's perceptions.
I mean, Apart from personal experience, where do people get their perceptions from?
Information received. So you control that, you control perception.
So, oh yeah, conspiracy theory.
Reflex action. Oh, you're a matter.
It is a reflex action because it literally reaches a point of psychological programming where it's the equivalent of pressing enter.
That's why it's so quick.
Oh, you're a conspiracy theorist.
That's rubbish. Would you like to see the evidence?
Oh, no, it's conspiracy theory. And so this is an area that I focus on so profoundly, and that is pointing out the psychological manipulation of perception and how it's done.
To point out to people why they think what they do and why everyone around them thinks the same.
Because people say, well, everyone knows that.
Everyone says that. Yes, because they've all been perceptually manipulated by the same program.
Question it and suddenly the everyone knows that is lying in pieces all over the floor because there's no credibility.
Repetition is one of the greatest forms of mind control.
Repeat the lie, repeat the lie, repeat the lie.
The lie becomes truth. This is how it works.
People also don't want the hassle of challenging the norms because there's a lot of hassle that comes with it.
The ridicule, the condemnation, the people thinking you're a bit strange.
All this is just part of the course.
It's part of the job of actually challenging norms.
Most people don't want to do that, so they just repeat the norms and stay in the box, stay in the perceptual prison cell, which is how the few control the many.
Well, I think you call that the postage stamp agenda, don't you?
Yeah, the postage stamp consensus, I call it, yeah.
Well, I think until recently I was within that postage stamp without realising it, so I'm glad to have stepped out.
But I tell you, for anyone out there that thinks, oh no, I'd like to question things and I'd like to give my opinion, which is different to the norm, but what will happen?
I'll tell you what will happen.
You'll set yourself free.
You set yourself free.
Once you step out of concern or fear of what other people think of you, and you speak your truth, because you have not only the integrity, you have the self-respect to speak your truth and not repeat someone else's without question, then you'll see what freedom really is.
The freedom to open your mouth and say what you think.
Without mental gymnastics going on, how do I put this so they'll think I'm not crazy?
What do I leave out so they'll think I'm sane?
I passed that time a long time ago where I couldn't give a damn whether people think I'm sane or not.
I'm just interested in the truth and what's going on.
And it's a wonderful freedom.
It's a wonderful freedom.
There's no concern about, well, what will they think if I say this?
My concern is, is it true or not?
That's my only concern. If I think it's true, I'm going to say it.
Yeah, that seems to be a great philosophy for a journalist.
It is actually, isn't it?
If only more of them were like that.
You mentioned there, just in regards to racism, allegations.
I know you've suffered that yourself during the UK tour.
This is nothing to do with antisemitism.
It's to do with a much bigger agenda of silencing freedom of speech.
So what you're looking at, therefore, is a spineless theme That appears through journalism, appears through venue owners, appears through members of parliament.
That will not stand up for freedom of speech.
And this is something that sickens me beyond belief, because what these organizations have done, there are many of them, and they operate worldwide under something the Israeli government calls the Hasbara, or the Explaining.
What they've done is weaponized the term anti-Semitism.
So what happens is they have so weaponized it, they've made it such a term that generates immediate fear that people's backbones go when anyone mentions it.
There's a problem with anti-Semitism.
Oh my God, not anti-Semitism.
But again, we're back to this question that's been a theme of this chat.
Is it true that Is it true?
Do some people hate Jewish people because they're Jewish?
Yes, no doubt they do.
And that's ridiculous. But that doesn't mean that every time the term anti-Semitism is thrown at someone that it's actually applicable and true and justified.
In my experience, a large number of times, it's not because at the same time these groups have appeared to weaponize anti-Semitism and use it as a way of silencing people saying things they don't want the public to hear.
They've also widened In the last short number of years, 2016 I think, the definition of anti-Semitism, which has gone from hatred of Jewish people because they're Jewish, which like I say is a ridiculous thing The Labour Party that are being targeted are not being racist at all.
They're just criticizing Israel and its behavior and its treatment of Palestinians.
When you look at what has been done to Palestinians in Gaza in the last week, of course, there's a massive PR problem between the Israeli government and the people of the world, basically.
These groups are there to do whatever they can to mitigate that situation by preventing the legitimate exposure of what the Israeli government is doing.
This is a very important point.
When you talk about, you mentioned people who are Jewish, like William Crystal and Robert Kagan, Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Zachaheim, etc., are involved in manipulation.
They say that, and it's obviously, you know, something that's being agreed as part of the script, that's an anti-Semitic trope, that's the line they use, that Jews run the world, right?
Okay. But I'm not saying that.
I'm saying these people are manipulating in the situation they're in, in government or in military or in the Pentagon or whatever.
So they reach a situation with this, that's an anti-Semitic trove, that if you mention anyone at all, Who is Jewish in relation to their manipulation of a situation, you're immediately anti-Semitic.
So it's a defense mechanism.
You know this guy, Wadsworth, who's just been thrown out of the Labour Party, he indicated that a Jewish Labour MP was working, I think, with the Daily Telegraph, in cohorts with the Daily Telegraph to undermine Corbyn.
So she said that's an anti-Semitic trope.
It's very simple what's happened.
You widen the definition of anti-Semitism to include the criticism of Israel.
Anyone who criticizes Israel is now a racist.
That's what's happened.
They are there to police that weaponization of anti-Semitism.
And people are frightened of them.
They're intimidated by them.
But you're talking to someone who isn't.
Because they need to be outed.
The truth needs to be told.
Am I right in thinking with the groups that they won't enter into dialogue with you?
It's a closed book in terms of, right, you're anti-Semitic, we're going to repeat that until it becomes true.
Yeah, it's just keep repeating the lie and people will believe it.
I've had people on the so-called left in politics who said to me, you're an anti-Semite.
I said, okay, where's your evidence?
Well, everyone knows that.
Yeah, usual story.
You've got none. Because there is none.
You saw my philosophy on life in Southbourne.
To self-identify with race, let alone be racist, is the ultimate misunderstanding of The nature of reality.
▲
Export Selection