David Icke talks to Sputnik about Salisbury, Syria, & the demonization of Russia
|
Time
Text
It's becoming embarrassing, frankly.
A classic manipulative technique used through the ages is to accuse your opponent of what you're doing.
And for the term barefaced lying and ridicule of critics to come from the mouth of the Director General of MI5 is extraordinary.
The guy is in desperate need of a mirror.
You know, as I've observed this, And the public responds to this, not least in Britain.
It's clear that the authorities have found themselves living in a time warp in this sense.
They, for infinitum, have basically been able to say anything about what happened.
And vast numbers of people would believe them because the authorities say it.
That response we still have with the mainstream media But what they've lost the plot on is the general public are not buying it anymore.
They're asking increasingly, because they're becoming more streetwise about this, two key questions whenever this nonsense communicated.
One, who benefits?
Who benefits from me believing what the authorities are telling me to believe?
Well, in this case, clearly, benefits is anyone that wants to demonize Russia.
And the demonization of Russia is a global campaign for much bigger geopolitical reasons.
And question number two is where's your evidence?
They work, and clearly Parker is still working, on the idea that you keep repeating the lie and then people will believe it.
And the more you repeat the lie, the more the lie becomes a gimme, no evidence necessary, but more and more people are saying, where is the evidence?
And the more they lie about Salisbury case, the more they lie about fake Assad chemical attacks in Syria, the more cynical and questioning the public are becoming.
So this is really counterproductive because I know I've just been on a UK speaking tour all over England.
People are absolutely seeing through this now in greater numbers than ever before.
The interesting thing is that this government, the Conservative government, where they're obviously struggling to affect negotiated settlement over Brexit, they need all the support they're getting, and this drive towards the geopolitical agenda with America...
And everything that they're now contriving to say, albeit it's a pack of lies, or on the face of it appears to be a pack of lies, is just slowly diluting the government's support.
And you would have thought they'd want as much support they need in this very challenging time of negotiated settlement to get out of Brexit.
What's your take on that, David?
There's a much bigger global geopolitical agenda going on here.
It goes back to the project for the New American Century and their list of regime changes in the Middle East from September 2000.
And part of all this geopolitical picture is the demonization of Russia.
That's why there's all this massive NATO buildup on the borders of Russia.
And before you can justify any, if you like, conflicts, I mean, we've seen this again and again and again in the Middle East.
Demonize Saddam Hussein, invade on a lie, by the way.
Demonize Gaddafi, demonize Assad, and then invade or get your proxy armies to invade.
And so we're seeing this Again, laughable now, campaign of demonisation of Russia.
But they've overcooked the pot, this is the point, because it's becoming so yawningly predictable.
It's the Russians, it's the Russians, it's the Russians.
I mean, nothing in this whole story fits.
Just give us a sort of insight as to the type of response and attitude of the general public and what they're saying to you at the moment.
What's the feedback you're getting?
So I've seen extraordinary change in public attitudes and public questioning of authority.
And it's not just the numbers that come now, which are tremendous.
It's also the type of people...
I mean, a number of people said to me at venues around England...
How do you explain this amazing cross-section of British society that comes to these events?
Because they go from teenagers to people of 18.
We've had people of nearly 100 years old come along, and all the different levels of society, if you like, and expressions of society, income brackets, Race, religion, it's a cross-section because the situation now is that there has been a plan for the world which has been unfolding for a long time and it's based on centralization of power into the hands of fewer and fewer people.
This is what globalization is about.
This is what acquiring countries is about.
But there comes a point where you can no longer do that under the radar because if you're going to transform global society into a centralized global state, which is what the plan is, Then at some point, you've got to break the surface and start making it obvious to the people you are manipulating that actually this is happening.