David Icke On Brilliant New Book 'Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told '
|
Time
Text
Broadcasting the information the mainstream media won't touch. This is the
Richie Allen Show in association with David Icke.com. Right, welcome to this pretty
special and very unique program.
It's me, of course, Richie, with you.
And as I record this, it's 2.32pm on Thursday, the, God knows what, the 14th to 15th.
What is it, David? It's on the mail, isn't it?
I've got a paper, yeah. You've got a paper, yeah.
It's the 16th, mate.
It's the 16th of November 2017.
We've had this studio in Manchester City Centre for about three years now.
How many times has it you've been in this studio recording with me?
First time.
This is the first time. It's extraordinary.
Just to set the scene, David was in London last night at the Troxey Theatre
as part of three events for the launch of David's brand new and outstanding book
Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told.
It was a magnificent night last night.
It was great. You were great as well. It was really memorable.
It was really enjoyable, wasn't it?
The questions coming from the audience, the vibe, delighted to be there, wonderful stuff.
Yeah, and the atmosphere. So many nice, open-minded, open-hearted people tend to come to the events.
And so the atmosphere is always lovely, and the interaction is always lovely, and it's such a pleasure to do.
Brilliant stuff. And we've driven, we've obviously driven up from London, you and I today, and you're in Manchester tomorrow night.
You're looking forward to that. I'm going to ask you to move a little bit closer to that mic, by the way.
Okay. Yeah, so Manchester tomorrow, Friday night.
You're looking forward to that. Yes, absolutely.
Manchester is a place that, from my information, has always been very open, even in the bad old days when virtually no one wanted to know.
There was always more interest in Manchester than most other places, so I always love coming here.
We... I've read the book.
I suppose... I know other people were given the book to review.
I talked a little bit about it last night on stage at the Troxie.
It's always difficult for me because people will say...
Some people will say, well, you know, you love David.
You work with David. You're bound to say this and you're bound to say that.
I'm not bound to say anything.
And my integrity and my word is very important to me.
Nothing will appear in print this year or next year or the year after like that book, mate.
It is outstanding.
Again, it's like going up a level every time from the Perception Deception to Phantom Self In how you're connecting dots, as you would say, bringing all these events that are happening on planet Earth to bear, scrutinizing them, and explaining where it's all going.
It's a magnificent read, and I can't recommend it highly enough.
So congratulations on that.
I mean that. It's brilliant. Well, that's the most very kind.
But what happens is the more that you know, the more...
That you see what is interesting against what is fundamentally important.
And so what I've done with the book is pull together the fundamentally important.
And of course it leads along a road that eventually takes us to the Devil's Playground in Silicon Valley.
Because, you know, as each of the books has its own personality, it has its own emphasis.
But together, they are a reflection of my journey.
Obviously, as each one has followed the other, the path has moved and the direction becomes clearer.
In this one, it's as clear as you can get so far where the epicenter of human control is being Is being created and that's Silicon Valley.
Not that necessarily the center of power is in Silicon Valley.
That's coming from other areas like the Pentagon and the secret society network.
But where it's playing out...
Is Silicon Valley for two reasons.
One, that they are, of course, the driving force behind the connection of the human brain, the human mind to artificial intelligence, which is the holy grail of human control and where it's been leading to all along.
And on the other side, of course, you have the The control increasingly out of Silicon Valley of what people can see and what they can't see.
So in the same tiny area, and I've been there a few times and passed through it, it's by American standards a very small area.
And yet out of there, Is coming the driving force to basically end humanity as we know it through transhumanist technology and artificial intelligence.
And of course through Google and Google-owned YouTube and Facebook and all these others, Twitter increasingly, you're seeing the Algorithmic censorship of what people can see and hear.
And the control of what people can see and hear.
And those two things are absolutely the epicenter of where this whole long story of human control has been heading.
And we're looking it in the eye now.
Which is where the urgency comes from in the book because I did mention yesterday and I mentioned on the show during the week as well, there's a real palpable sense of urgency in the book.
Your books are always urgent because it's always been unfolding quickly.
But the events we're seeing transpiring now, you touched on the censorship there.
We might talk more about that in a minute.
Yeah. It's a raid of knots now, David, isn't it?
It's sped up to the point that it's, and you used to say to me, as it becomes more apparent to people, it will increase in velocity.
That's why there's such a palpable sense of urgency and determinism in the book, I think.
Yeah, I think there's an urgency on both sides of this.
There is an urgency in the book, as I said in London at the Troxie last night.
It's not a, you know, don't panic Mr.
Mannering kind of, ah, what are we going to do?
Oh my God! But it's an urgency in terms of what we have to do and what we have to see now, not tomorrow, not the next day, now.
But there's an urgency also.
On the other side of this, which is those seeking to impose this control.
And again, one of the things I talked about last night was the fact that over the years I've been saying that There'll come a time when all that's been hidden and has been manipulated under the radar will have to break the surface where it can be seen for a simple reason.
If you want to transform human society into a certain way, into a certain image, then you've got to actually do that at some point.
And all that you've been preparing for and manipulating towards must therefore become...
In people's faces, they must eventually be able to see it.
Now that is a dangerous time, obviously, because they've reached the point where this society is starting to break the surface where we can see it, but it's a great danger to them.
Because, you know, I've always been aware of this, all the way through since I've been involved in this, I knew that it had to get a certain Distance along the road to where they want to go before it became so obvious that large numbers of people, large enough on the scale to make the difference, would actually be in a situation where they couldn't deny it anymore.
They couldn't be in denial.
Oh no, it's not happening.
It's just a conspiracy theory.
It's here. Look at it.
So we are in a period now where This is breaking the surface.
The censorship, the transhumanism, the increasing Orwellian control and impositions, it's breaking the surface.
It's in people's faces.
And therefore, we now have an opportunity and a window in this...
Transformation from the point where it breaks the surface to the point where it's so in place that basically all challenge will have been blocked and snuffed out.
This is the period where we either make a difference and we bring this nonsense to an end or it reaches its fruition.
And that's why you're picking up the urgency in the writing of the book.
Come on, now, now, not tomorrow.
But like I say, on the other side, they're desperately trying to get this on.
They're trying to push this on for a simple reason.
They want this period between when it breaks the surface and when they've got it all in place to be as short as possible.
That's why they're pushing on and everything seems to be moving so fast.
It's like, oh, hold on, they've seen we're shutting the door.
Shut the door as fast as you can.
And, you know, the job of people like you, me, and other people involved in this is to make it very clear that the door is closing and why and how.
And also, To alert people to different stages of this so we slow the process down as best we can.
So they're shutting this symbolic door a lot less fast than they really like to because of the exposure of what this This thing in isolation here and this thing in isolation here and this thing in isolation here are actually going towards and creating.
If you put all those things together and see it as one momentum, one movement, one direction instead of a series of random events, connecting the dots, of course, is the way that's described.
So we're in a very, very important time.
And an urgent time when we have to get our act together here big time fast.
And I am encouraged.
I mean, when I look at the world and where it's going and how fast it's going there, I shouldn't be encouraged.
But I am, because having been doing this now for the best part of three decades, I've seen the momentum of...
People opening their minds to things they would have rejected before.
I've seen that momentum gather.
I've seen the numbers gather.
And I have seen the urgency gather.
So the next very few years are going to be the epicenter of all this and where this world goes from here.
And that's where the urgency comes from.
The book is brilliant.
It's in several parts, of course, and it builds up.
I don't know whether you're consciously aware that you're doing it or whether it's a natural gift.
I think it's a natural gift, the way it shifts tempo.
I mean it really does. One of the things that's extraordinary is how you describe and explain
how the that which controls it has made us obsessed with ourself and how that is designed to
obviously prevent us from seeing what's going on because we are obsessed with ourself but also how
it imposes a kind of a self-censorship because you're going to talk about some interesting and
some funny things now that you've noticed on the drive on the way up from London but that's
that's a hugely important step before you get on to talk about synthetic human and transhumanism.
This kind of driving us to eliminate all else except that which we hold dear to ourselves, how that self-censors and how it, you know, furthers that agenda.
It's brilliant. We're talking here, of course, about gender politics and identity politics, which is massive right now.
Well, of course, the bottom line of any tyranny by the few imposing itself on the many is divide and rule.
And what we're seeing is the divide getting more and more into the minute of detail.
What I mean by that is you can create a religion And the religion can be played off against other religions.
So there you've got a divide and rule.
But if you look at the history of religions, the individual religions then break up into factions, Protestant and Catholic and Sunni and Shiite.
And then they break up into factions.
And so the divide and rule increasingly divides in smaller and smaller parts.
So there's more and more divide to play against each other and create the rule and the focus on each other and fighting each other, which obscures the fact that strings are attached to everybody and are held by the same hand.
And then You've got male and female, and there's two groups that you can manipulate to play off against each other, divide and rule.
And then you start to break up the male and female into smaller groups, just like the religions, like fractal patterns.
And now we've got so many different groups Minute, detailed descriptions of different sexualities.
I mean, it's unbelievable.
As I've said, you know, LBG, all this stuff.
I've said in the book, you know, with 26 letters in the alphabet, they haven't even started yet.
It's just crazy.
But what's happening? They're breaking up.
We're dividing the target population into smaller and smaller labels, what I call label consciousness, so that they can play more and more labels off against each other.
And what we're doing...
Well, what they're doing is getting the divide and rule down to individuals divided against individuals at that mass level of individual divide and rule.
And we've reached the point, of course, where we had...
The feminist movement, which was saying rights for women and all that.
That's all good.
But now we're having the feminist movement, or a member of the feminist movement recently, having a punch-up in the street with someone who's transgender.
I shouldn't laugh.
It's like I say in the book, you know, yesterday's victim becomes today's oppressor.
Oh yeah, you were a victim then, but we've now broken up the labels into smaller parts and smaller minorities and smaller victim groups.
Therefore, you're no longer the major victim now.
You've become an oppressor.
And it's a hierarchy of victimhood and a hierarchy of Of alleged discrimination.
And of course, at the top, bar one now is transgender.
But as I again say in the book, you know, by the time I finish this sentence, there'll be two or three more probably.
Oh, look, there you are. 72 on Facebook at the moment.
How could you choose between 72 genders?
It's... It has to be called what it is.
You have a chapter called Saying the Unsayable, which is fantastic.
I mean, it's going to upset a few people, that particular chapter in the book.
That need to be upset, and maybe they can find a mirror and have a mature conversation with it, because it's getting so absolutely nonsensical.
So, again, what this comes down to is the me, me, me society.
You know, I don't care what gender someone...
Chooses to believe themselves to be.
It's none of my business.
What I say to them is don't make it my business.
It's up to you.
You live your life as you see fit.
Don't start imposing on me things that suit you all the time.
At the deletion of my rights and my human rights and my right to free speech and free expression.
If we're having justice and fairness, that means justice and fairness for all, not just your minority self-identity group.
And so you are looking at a self-obsession where people have to tell the world What the minute detail of their own sexuality is.
I'm not interested. We're not interested.
It's your life.
You live it. Leave the rest of us alone.
And don't start messing with our language.
Don't call people Nazis and bigots just because they don't have the same opinion as you.
Just get on with your bloody life.
Live your own life, absolutely.
But of course, what it is, is of course...
We've had examples of this in recent weeks.
Often it's not the genuine transgender people and these genuine members of what I call minority groups that are kicking this off, that are driving this lunacy.
It's people doing it on their behalf.
It's people who are offended on their behalf.
Well, just live your own life.
But of course, then you go deeper in the shadows and deeper in the shadows and it's all being orchestrated for the reasons we're talking about.
Massive divide and rule.
And when I say...
That transgender is currently at the top of the victimhood, me, me, me hierarchy of politically correct victim groups.
Of course, at the top is Zionism.
And it's been the trailblazer for this nonsense where you can't have an opinion unless you are labelled racist and a Nazi for having a different opinion to what is not a race.
But an ideology, very different thing.
And so in the book, I've really challenged that as well.
But what we're looking at is, as these victim groups are manufactured, because they are, and then the language is changed to not offend the victim group, What's happening is the language of humanity is being deleted.
And it's Orwell's Newspeak and Oldspeak in the book 1984, where in Oldspeak these were words, like the language we've had up to this point, which could express your thoughts and your opinions in detail.
It was a vibrant language.
Where the detail of your thoughts could be verbally expressed.
And then in 1984, Big Brother moved to Newspeak, which were words that didn't say anything.
Because basically, they were designed not to say anything.
They couldn't express your thoughts and opinions in any detail.
And as Orwell pointed out, basically, once you can't express your opinions verbally in detail, we think in words.
When people have thoughts, they're thinking in words.
Now, if you destroy and delete language that can express detail, how do you even think in detail once that language has gone as the generations pass?
You can't. And this is the whole point.
It makes verbal expression of any detail impossible.
So you can't say this because it will upset the Zionists.
So that's this language gone.
You can't say that. You can't say that.
You can't have that opinion. Okay, transgender.
There's loads of words being taken.
Even mum and dad and boy and girl are being taken out of circulation.
Can't say that anymore. And then you have all these other minority groups where you can't say this or have this opinion because it will upset someone.
And what it's doing, it is deleting, transforming and destroying the human language.
And those of us that can see it Have a choice.
People can go on walking backwards down the road until their back hits the wall, at which point there will be no freedom of expression left and no right to say anything that's not off the song sheet of the official norms and imposed belief systems and opinions of the state, of the system.
Or, and this is why I wrote the book as I have, and this is why, using a boxing analogy, I've pulled not a single punch, is because we have to call this out.
We have to call lunacy a lunacy.
We have to call idiocy, idiocy, and point out why.
Because if we don't, that wall behind us is beckoning and we have to stop now.
And stop being intimidated into silence.
Stop being intimidated into self-censorship, where there's not even a debate about whether something can be said or not.
People simply do not say it.
And you mentioned a story that we were talking about in the car coming up.
Well, you found a story in today's Daily Mail, which is startling to me.
I saw it on the Mail website last night, and I saw it in their print edition today.
Did you call me manful?
It's sexist.
Top surgeon is made to apologise after trying to praise father for bringing his daughter to hospital.
Okay, he meant... This is the surgeon they're talking about.
He meant to praise a young patient's father, but his choice of words has landed a consultant in hot water.
Colin Bailey said Billy Martin had manfully stepped in to take his daughter to an appointment when his wife, Jo, was ill.
But the couple condemned the pediatric surgeon's comment in a letter as sexist and were so angry they posted it on social media.
This is what the consultant wrote.
Unfortunately, her mum, the girl, could not be at the clinic visit today as she has not been well and the father stepped in manfully.
The couple from Chorley, Lancashire, claim they could not imagine him using womanfully in the same context.
Go and live in freaking Gaza.
Go and live in Syria.
Go and live in Libya.
And tell me what upset means.
This is the level of lunacy we have reached now.
Whether someone says manfully, it wasn't meaning any harm.
It's a word that was often used.
Manfully stepped in.
Okay. Okay, you might say, oh, right.
Well, they wouldn't say womanfully, would you?
Okay, okay, that's the comment.
Fair enough, yeah. But to throw up a paddy like they have thrown, where she's saying, it made me feel guilty because I could not attend.
And it was like they were pointing it out.
No, it wasn't, you idiot.
Morons. Morons, yes.
And... And we have a situation now where people have been so manipulated to be upset and offended by the most innocuous thing that you can see the divide and rule coming down to this minute level I'm talking about where Now a surgeon who should be concentrating on his job of treating the child, including their child, is going to be going through this constant mental gymnastics of whether he's going to put a word out of place in a bloody letter to people.
You know, in the same way, you've got this stuff in Westminster about the abuse of women, genuine abuse of women.
Absolutely. We need to deal with that big time.
But a lot of that is obscured by the lumping in to genuine abuse of what is just a joke or a bit of what we call banter.
And it's It was summed up for me by a member of parliament who said recently, I will never hug a woman again.
Basically, it was not my wife.
For fear. I will only shake their hand from now on.
And what is that doing?
It's driving people apart.
It's dividing us and that's what is going on.
In every single area of human discourse and human interaction, different factions now down to the individual level are being driven apart.
And if people can be upset at someone saying manfully in a letter...
I mean, isn't what's happening to their daughter rather more important?
And the guy's competence at his job, his ability to do it.
He was great.
They say in this story that, you know, the treatment was fine and the visit went well.
Isn't that... All that really matters.
Not whether someone says manfully or whatever.
It's just a freaking word.
And as I've said in the book, you know, I'm offended.
Well, choose not to be.
It's that simple.
Because in the end, whether people are offended or not, is not even...
The work of the person who says something to them.
It's whether they accept being offended by what he said.
Therefore, when you choose not to be offended, you're taking your power back.
Because you're controlling your life by choosing not to be offended by an idiot.
Or even not so in this case.
We would have thought, wouldn't we?
I mean, you've been a journalist for decades.
God love you. I mean, you have been.
You've been writing and covering the media for many, many, many years.
When you read a headline like that, I mean, the headline was written about manfully, but if you read a headline that a hospital official offended a family, you were expecting something like, you know, he called them some awful name or he spat at them or he swore at them.
You said to me some years ago, we did a program in Spain and I remember, you said that there is an energy exchange between people when people spend time with one another and their guards are down and they're not defensive.
There's this auric field you talk about, this energy flow between people which is healthy for people.
You just said a minute ago That people are going to self-censor, not put their arm on a colleague's shoulder to say, hey, well done.
That report you did, great stuff, or a hug or a squeeze because of what might the consequences be.
And that is interrupting the energy flow.
That's what you're getting at. Absolutely.
What you've got is the language is destroying verbal discourse.
And the fear of being called sexist or sexual harassment is destroying the physical discourse, like giving someone a hug.
And, of course, the main driver of this is that they have released a virulent virus on the human race called Be a Victim.
The victim virus, I'll call it that.
And when you are contaminated or you pick up the victim virus, to maintain your sense of victimhood, you have to find more and more and constant reasons to feel victimized, to feel offended.
And so what happens is more and more mild, ridiculous, innocuous things, Offend you.
Because you need your fix.
It literally is.
You go into victimhood cold turkey.
No one's said anything to me today that's offended me.
Oh, thank God!
I've just got a letter. It says mentally.
Oh, God, I've got me fixed.
It is mental illness.
It is a psychological disease.
And what it does, of course, He's then obscure real discrimination under the cover of fake discrimination.
Basically, I had this thing I used to say years ago.
I call it the deathbed perception.
You're on your deathbed, you've got 10 minutes to live, and someone says to you, what really matters in your life now?
What really matters to you?
What about that person in 1963 that said that about you?
Does it matter now? You know when you went absolutely spare and started screaming in the street at her?
Does it matter now?
No. What about this person that said this?
No. That person that did that to you and you went up and smacked him?
No. No, it doesn't.
None of it matters. What matters is you see the greater perspective.
The only thing that matters is to love each other and to be loved.
That's all that really matters.
Everything else is detail and diversion.
And, you know, in this deathbed perception, symbology, you then say to the person, well, actually, you're not going to die in 10 minutes.
So now live the rest of your life with the mentality that you've just told me.
Brilliant, man. Brilliant.
But when someone is in that situation of current generations, and you say to them, Did it matter that your pronouns weren't always what you wanted them to be?
You know that time that you walked into this room of people that didn't know you, looking like a woman.
Do you still think it's important that because you look like a woman, they referred to you as her?
When you had decided you were a he.
I mean, thinking back now, you've got 10 minutes to live.
Was it really important that they said, he instead of her, when you, her instead of he, when you look like a woman?
Well, no. No.
Not only is it not important now, it wasn't important then.
The only person that made it important, and the fact that you went and complained about it, or whatever, was you.
You decided that even though you look like a woman, but you've decided you're a man, You have decided that if someone doesn't refer to you as a man, even though you look like a woman, then you've got to complain to someone.
You've got to maybe even get them sacked, as some people have been.
The lunatocracy is what it is.
You've got to get them suspended, like some teachers have been.
Teachers being suspended, yeah.
Other teachers scared to say anything, lest they be suspended, of course.
See, this is the thing. You have to take examples and make examples of people, especially if they're well known, so you get more publicity for it, but anyone, really. You have to take someone...
Who has done something totally innocuous, said something totally innocuous and quite understandably referred to someone because that's what they look like.
And you have to give them hell.
Because that says, like you just indicated, Rich, that says to everyone else in that position, this is what happens when you don't refer to people in exactly, again, the minute detail that they have decided they should be addressed with.
And so you have this freezing of...
Where they're terrified to say anything or do anything because they fear the consequences.
And what this does, it freezes the flow of discourse.
People don't naturally interact and spontaneously respond.
They go through the mental preparation before they open their mouth to speak.
And it's destroying human interaction, and that's what it's meant to do.
And like I say, and this is why I've written the book as I have, we have to call a lunacy a lunacy because that's what it is.
Instead of, you know, like the...
The Emperor's New Clothes, where people say, think inside, oh, it's lunacy.
But then the way they express themselves, they say, oh, yes, yes, we must respect.
Yes, we must do that.
That's right. We must not discriminate against.
Well, inside, they're thinking, what a load of crap.
But they're so terrified of saying that because they fear the consequences.
And what this does is freezes not only discourse and interaction, it freezes the opinions to challenge the lunacy.
And if we allow lunacy to go unchallenged, the lunacy takes over everything.
And that is what we're seeing.
That's what this whole manful lunacy is.
It's all about.
It's got to that level of nonsense.
And that is what happens when you do not challenge and call out insanity.
Because what happens then?
Insanity becomes the norm.
I heard that story, didn't we, of the...
We covered it.
I know DavidIke.com went big on it.
This idea that we'll get cross-dressing folks into this nursery...
You know, to read the rhymes, just in case those children grow up to be bigots and not understand about diversity.
And again, apart from the Mail on Sunday, which, I mean, we know what the Mail is, you and I. It's like any other newspaper, but it does more than other papers to kind of show that this lunacy, as you've quite rightly described it, is there.
And there's nobody really challenging the silliness of that.
You know, I was thinking, coming up in the car today, you were married to Linda for years.
29, yeah. 29 years.
You're great friends. I've been with Caroline for 15 years.
I have friends who've been with their wives and partners for years.
We learned to live with the idiosyncrasies of the people that we lived with.
We learned to live with things that annoyed us about them because we realised, well, there's plenty of things that we do that must annoy them as well.
And I was listening to you last night on stage and I was thinking...
Some of these people need to start applying the way that they've come up in their families, where you had to be annoyed by your family and you had to annoy them back.
And accept that people are entitled to think differently than you.
Doesn't make them bad people.
You'll find you have much more in common with them than some silly argument over, you are a woman but you feel like a man and he refers to you as she.
Well, live with that. Otherwise, you get on with him.
He's a good lad. You know, you work together or whatever like that.
We need to start learning to live with one another's idiosyncrasies.
But you know what I was thinking today?
And it's amazing in the book.
There's nothing like this book.
And there never will be anything like it.
This is being imposed on people to break them down to make it easier to do what?
To what's coming next. The synthetic...
Yeah, it's all leading in a very and ever more obviously clear direction.
But without seeing that direction, what has happened, for instance, with the transgender explosion and the assault on the language and the assault on free discourse, it just seems...
Crazy in and of itself and unfathomable.
And, you know, I've had this phrase I've used over many, many years.
If it comes out of nowhere and it's suddenly everywhere, it's the program.
It's the agenda. Someone's pressed a button on the next stage.
And this whole thing about transgender was just not talked about until...
Desperately recently.
And now, is anything else talked about?
What's going on?
It's everywhere. And as I've been on this world tour going around the world since the summer of 2016, I have this checklist when I go into a country of the agenda that I set out in the talk.
And I go in four or five days early into a country and I go, I check through the checklist.
Are these things that are in the global plan happening in this particular country?
And whether it's Australia or the Balkans or Europe or Scandinavia or North America, the same things are happening.
Further forward in some areas than others, but the same checklist gets a tick on it every time.
And one of them is transgender.
It's everywhere. And people are complaining about it.
They are upset about the way their language is being changed now.
So it's a global agenda.
It's being centrally coordinated.
And it is absolutely nothing to do with Stopping or perceived discrimination against transgender people.
I have a simple philosophy, do what you like so long as you don't impose it on anyone else.
So people's sexuality, their race, their religion, they have every right to pursue it, to believe in it, to self-identify with it.
Like I say, it's none of my business.
And I'll be the first in line when it comes to calling out discrimination that is genuine.
But we have a situation here where this is not about stopping discrimination of people who have genuinely fallen into this point where they think they're in the wrong body or are somewhere in between, wherever their sexuality they feel is.
This is about confusing people People, particularly children and the young, about their gender who were not confused before.
This is manufactured confusion.
This is why this gender fluidity theme is everywhere.
In children's television, everywhere you look, you're seeing it.
It's because they are preparing.
I go into this in the book.
They are preparing human perceptions for the no-gender human.
The idea in the end is to transform the human body, if you like, into a synthetic version of the human form.
And this synthetic human, as predicted in 1932 by Aldous Suxley in Brave New World, will not procreate in the way that humans have procreated before.
They will be created, that humans will be created in laboratories, and they will be synthetic bodies instead of the ones that we have now.
And therefore, as Huxley talked about.
They will be created specifically in castes.
There'll be worker castes and other castes to be genetically created for specific tasks like Worker ants.
And then there will be the other ruling group that will be a different genetic type.
The overseers.
Yeah. And these synthetic forms are designed to be technologically connected to artificial intelligence.
So basically they become vehicles for artificial intelligence.
And what we call human now will be gone.
And what we call human thought now will be gone.
And this is now being openly talked about in the devil's playground of Silicon Valley because they're trying to sell all this on the basis of taking us into the next stage of human evolution, as they call it, which is to become superhuman because we're attached to AI and all this stuff.
And this is why they're openly telling us, because the sales pitch is, it's going to be fantastic, and we're going to be amazing, and by the way, anyone who doesn't go with it is going to die out, that's what they're saying.
And so we have to be perceptually prepared for this.
And the point where they want to start bringing all this in, you know, big time, will be when the young generations today Especially the younger children, will be adults.
So they're being perceptually prepared for the no-gender human.
They're talking now about gender fluidity, but the idea is to move that through to no-genderism.
And, like I say, when you look at this guy, Dr.
Richard Day, who I write about in the books, a Rockefeller insider, who talked to a meeting of pediatricians in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 1969, and gave them chapter and verse of how the world was going to change, told them not to take notes or...
Record the talk, but one doctor, Dr.
Dunagan, did take notes and gave some interviews later about what they said in 1969.
And as people can see in the books, like Vant himself, where I've quoted this guy at some length, he was so accurate in terms of the world that we're seeing now, it's extraordinary.
And so was Huxley, and so was Orwell, because they had access to their projected agenda.
That's why they've been so accurate.
And what Day said as one of his predictions, this is what's going to happen, is that he said boys and girls were going to be made the same.
And this is what we're seeing now.
The various levels of the agenda unfold.
That's what I call pressing the button.
It's out of nowhere and suddenly everywhere.
And now in this period of just a few years, basically, We're having the transgender button being pressed and suddenly it's everywhere.
And it is designed to change the perception of humanity, human form, into eventually the no-gender human by going through this process of gender fluidity first.
But that's where it's heading, the no-gender human.
And that's why they're doing it. And that's why they're targeting the young more than anyone else.
Well, you made a brilliant point in the book.
If this gender fluidity thing, which I... Look, I'm not a psychiatrist or a psychologist.
For me, it's a nonsense.
It's absolute lunacy, this idea that you can be male and then on Wednesday you can be female.
And I'm not being flippant or mocking.
This is how it's being described.
You make an excellent point.
You say quite rightly, if this was a naturally occurring phenomenon, we wouldn't be hearing about it.
We wouldn't. If this was natural and, you know, it just happened to be that some people started to be thinking, well, I'm male, I'm female.
We would not be hearing about it and we would not be seeing, as you've written about, not just now but previously, that it is being imposed on children in primary schools, that they have to think about it, that they must choose from all these genders.
Yeah, and this is putting, to quote a newspaper, putting drag queens...
Into schools of kids of just a few years old.
Dragonory. And getting them to read stories and sing songs where the words have been changed to fit the gender agenda.
This is what it's all about.
It's about confusing children and changing their perception of gender.
Now... In the book, I quote a headmaster.
Can I say headmaster?
Sure, I must say headteacher, must not, even though he is male.
You bigot. I am a bigot.
So he's saying...
He's at a private school.
It costs a lot of money to go to.
And he's allowing boys to turn up in skirts.
And he's saying that...
He's responding to this whole gender fluidity thing that's happening.
And then he says, until relatively recently, in fact, until a few years ago, no one ever questioned their gender.
We never had this problem.
Well, has humanity suddenly gone through some genetic change Where people are starting to feel that they're in a different agenda than they were before.
Has the body suddenly gone through some chemical kind of transformation so that to explain all this?
No! What explains it is the systematic confusing of young people about gender and what gender they are.
And then, of course, Just as you get with the professional victims in the whole political correctness arena, what people call snowflakes, what I call in the book the generation jelly, people are using their often manufactured, mostly manufactured sense of victimhood as a way of being the center of bloody attention.
So, oh no! Oh, Ethel's been triggered!
Oh, poor Ethel!
Someone wrote Trump on the pavement!
Oh, Ethel's been triggered!
Oh, come and help Ethel!
Centre of attention. So, you're getting the same things happening in terms of gender, where people say, oh no, I'm a boy now, and I've decided to be a boy.
It's the centre of attention, and it's just...
Just responding to the fact that it's now trendy and, oh yeah, gender fluid, what are you?
You were light years ahead of this.
You were light years ahead of this because some years ago you took a clip from the life of Brian about Stan who wanted to be a woman.
We shall fight for your right to be a woman, Stan.
And one of the group was like, John Cleese, but it's ridiculous.
He's not a woman. I want to have bae.
No, no.
He can't have babies, but we shall fight for his right to have babies.
But we're seeing this.
Yeah, exactly. And you see, this is a great example, Richie, of where the real...
The focus of attention, where it really should be in this whole gender area, is being obscured by all the nonsense.
So while, you know, someone's coming in one morning and saying, I'm a girl, and they're coming in the next morning and saying that they're a boy...
And then deciding to change again, you know, when there's an R in the month or whatever.
While that's going on, this nonsense, this peripheral self-obsessed me-me-me nonsense, then there are people who are genuinely emotionally and perceptually in a situation where they feel different to their body.
And I have no doubt that these are genuine people in a genuine state of feeling they're in the wrong body.
And that's where the focus of attention should be, on helping those people come to terms with that and how best to deal with it.
But that... Just like genuine racism and genuine sexism is being obscured by all this nonsense that is there only to confuse and to divide and to rule and not to help those who are genuinely suffering from these different areas of the politically correct explosion that's gone on in recent years.
Shall we just take a very quick break?
Let's have a word from our sponsors.
Then we'll come back and I have no idea how long this is going to go on because we did this on...
David doesn't have enough to do.
He doesn't do enough. After months of travelling around the world and writing the book, it was his suggestion.
Let's have a chat. Well, it was kind of my suggestion, but he was up for it.
Let's have a chat while we're in Manchester.
David Icke is in Manchester this Thursday.
I don't even know again, Icke.
I have no idea what date it is.
The 14th, is it? 15th.
It's the 15th of November 2017.
Two outstanding evenings.
One with Mark Miller in Edinburgh, which was fantastic, at the caves.
Wonderful night at the Troxy last night.
It's great to be a part of that, to see that interaction between you and the audience.
Why is that? Well, because everything you need to know, but have never been told, will be published on Saturday.
And it's an extraordinary read on so many different levels.
It really is. Trigger warnings for about 60,000 different identity groups.
Around the world, I think.
Because there must be 60,000 now.
We'll have that quick break.
When we come back, we'll talk more.
David Icke with me in our studio for the first time ever after three years.
Back in a minute. Book launches are often hyped.
Then you open the first page and...
But David Icke's new book, Everything You Need to Know But Have Never Been Told, really will astonish you.
Thought-provoking and controversial.
It's available now, so read a real page-turner.
Everything You Need to Know But Have Never Been Told, by former footballer and presenter David Icke.
Available exclusively at davideich.com.
Have you lost access to important data from a computer hard drive, mobile phone, or other storage device?
Maybe you have a broken hard drive containing years of information, or a smartphone that no longer works from which you'd like the pictures, movies, and chats recovered.
If you would like to recover data from any type of digital device, including desktop and laptop computers, external hard drives, cameras, smartphones, NAS and RAID servers, then contact Data Clinic today at dataclinic.co.uk now.
Is your mind full of ideas, yet you struggle to put them down on paper?
Characters with no home, unfinished concepts that you always wanted to finalize, yet lacked knowledge and drive to complete.
The creative writing course from Creative Imaginings may be the long-awaited answer, designed to help you finish your masterpiece with better language techniques, detailed study of the character, plotted suspense chain, and valuable information to get published.
Don't delay your creation. Complete your 100% online course at www.creativeimaginings.com.au
Introducing the H2O app, a powerful water structuring application that programs vibrational
energies into water through the use of different sound frequencies.
Once programmed, the use of water for drinking, cooking, bathing.
Give it to your friends and colleagues or spread it around the garden.
The list goes on. It's not just water that the app can be used for either.
It's great for programming crystals too.
The H2O app is free to download and is available on both Android and Apple platforms.
For further information, go to h2oac.com.
There's a place high in the mountains of Spain, a sanctuary where souls gather from all around the globe to learn about themselves and experience powerful changes in the way we see our world.
They become awakened to their gifts.
Become part of this ever-growing worldwide family of unique, pure energy healing practitioners.
Discover how amazing you truly are.
Go to www.markbaerski.com It could just change your life forever.
Welcome back to this pretty unique and special programme.
Really on the fly, this.
I've not done anything like this for a while.
On the fly. Came back from London this afternoon, Thursday.
Jamie and the DavidIke.com crew doing an amazing job in London for the...
Second of three official events to celebrate and to push the launch of the new book, Everything You Need to Know But Have Never Been Told, which is out on Saturday.
It can be pre-ordered.
It can be ordered now, really, at davidike.com.
Go to davidike.com and order it.
So we drove back up the M1, the M11, the M God Knows What today.
And David is with us.
He's in Manchester ahead of tomorrow's event, which I'm not going to say where it is.
And that kind of segues nicely into what we're going to talk about now.
What's been very interesting, I shouldn't...
I call myself an outsider.
We're friends and we talk all the time.
People know that. There's no point in trying to hide that.
But you're very much your own man and you do your own thing.
Watching from the outside, the way...
The personal attacks on you.
And again, you've never been anybody to be, A, to even mention that, B, to get bothered by it.
You don't spend any time talking about, oh, I'm being attacked.
But national newspapers in recent months have been talking about the attempts to silence you, to stop events, the...
The buggers, I could use even stronger language, but I won't.
The buggers have been successful, you know, in terms of they've, you know, annoyed you in Canada, but you got the event on anyway.
They've halted events that you might have done in Germany.
They did it in Manchester, but the event is going ahead anyway.
This to me is indicative, this is brilliant, it's wonderful, right?
Because it's indicative of the fact that Your audience worldwide has grown steadily for 25 years to the point where it's bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger.
But these are Zionist lobbying groups in the United Kingdom and of course it's a perfect time to talk about them, what they've been doing to silence you, let's be honest about it, in a week when they've been, well, Preeti Patel, the former International Development Secretary, has been caught out going to Israel on holidays, presumably to take instructions.
From Benjamin Netanyahu and his government on things like the Israeli army and stuff like that.
And then, of course, the Prince Charles letters written in the 1980s.
This is a wonderful time, really.
What's going on with all of this?
Well, the penny is dropping that...
Israel is not just, if you like, a little local difficulty in the Middle East in conflict with the Palestinians, but is actually a global network.
And ultimately, you've got the House of Rothschild behind this form of Zionism that I'm talking about.
...called Revisionist Zionism, which was basically created by a guy, Jabotinsky, who believed that imposing the will of the Zionist agenda by violence was fair and the right thing to do.
It just happens that his personal assistant was Benjamin Netanyahu's father, I would suggest that the way the Palestinians have been treated Since the invasion, as I would perceive it, of the Palestinian lands out of Europe after the Second World War, that would be a situation that demanded attention by itself and demanded exposure by itself.
But it's more than that.
We have a situation where there are networks that answer to this extreme Zionist cabal.
I mean, let me put that into context.
Depending on how you define what Jewish means, if you take a ballpark figure of what they call core Jewish people that absolutely identify with being Jewish, There's about 15 million of them in the world of 7.5 billion.
Then you take away those Jewish people that vehemently oppose Zionism and that number gets considerably smaller.
You then look at the great majority who identify with being Zionists in the sense that they support the existence of Israel.
But do not understand what this core, what I will call revisionist Zionism or Rothschild Zionism is doing in their name.
I mean, you've met people in this Manchester area where you've explained what some of these groups are doing, even in this area.
And the Jewish people in general have no idea.
They've never heard of most of them.
They've never heard of these groups.
Not only that, but don't agree with them.
Exactly. So when you then take away, and many of those people who you speak of there will identify with being Zionists because they support the existence of Israel and they associate that with Zionism.
And Zionism, by the way, is an ideology.
It is a political movement and belief system.
It is not a race.
That's the point. And so you take those Zionists away who do not know what's being done in their name from that 15 million and you are left with a dramatically small number of people who...
are part of what I call secret society Zionism or revisionist Zionism, the violent anything goes version.
And the numbers of those in positions of influence and power in America and Britain, etc.
is absolutely ridiculous in terms of ratio to positions of power and influence and numbers.
Now this is a fact.
I know we live in a post-fact world.
But some of us are actually in a factual bubble, if you like.
We actually do like facts.
We think they matter. So that is a fact.
And you look at the chairman and heads of the Federal Reserve in America, there's
one Zionist after another, after another, after another, after another. You look at
who runs the Treasury in America currently, it's people from
Goldman Sachs, all of which are Zionists that were appointed by Trump.
The major advisers to Trump, like his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, are vehement Zionists.
In fact, his father is a close friend, a longtime close friend of Benjamin Netanyahu.
Netanyahu actually sat in Jared Kushner's bed at his home when he visited there once.
That's how close they are.
And so it goes on.
You go into the Obama administration, as I did in the perception deception, and looked at all the Zionist people in the positions of financial power, all the Zionist people involved before, during, and after 9-11 in the administrations in the key areas.
You look at Hollywood, one of the great perceptual programmers of human perception.
Because anywhere you go in the world, there are the Hollywood movies.
You have...
Lots and lots of people getting their version of history from Hollywood movies, which produce a version of historical events that are actually nonsensical, but believed to be true by so many people.
So it's a great place for perceptual programming.
And Hollywood is absolutely controlled by Zionists.
Actors and actresses are terrified of calling them out because their careers will be over, but that's the truth.
People like Harvey Weinstein, they're just examples of this.
You look at much of the mainstream media corporations and this massive Zionist influence in those.
And then you look into the Devil's Playground, Silicon Valley, and you have Google created and controlled by Zionists.
You have, of course, YouTube the same because it's owned by Google.
You have Facebook run by Zionists.
And so it goes on.
And this is why these Silicon Valley organizations are employing people like the ultra-Zionist Anti-Defamation League.
To advise them on censorship of the internet based on what they call hate speech.
And hate speech is defined by anything that suits them and their agenda for people not to hear.
So wherever you look...
You look at the example in Britain of the political adviser at the Israeli embassy, who was caught out on camera, secret filming by Al Jazeera.
Meeting with members of these Friends of Israel organizations within all the major political parties, something like 80% of Conservative MPs are members of the Conservative Friends of Israel.
And what these groups are and these other attack groups that are trying to silence people like me...
They are part of a network to make sure that anything that challenges Zionism and its goals and methods and behavior, or the behavior and actions of Israel, is silence. That's what it's about.
And it's an extreme example of what we were talking about earlier with this, you can't say this, you can't say that.
So, if you had a political advisor from almost any other embassy apart from Israel and the United States, I'm sure, in Britain, who was caught on camera Saying that he wants to, to these Friends of Israel members, that he wants to take out or take down, take down a conservative government minister because of his views on Israel.
There would be absolutely outrage.
They'd be expelled, wouldn't they?
Or that hell would break loose in the political arena.
What happened when an Israeli embassy advisor was caught saying that?
Nothing. Nothing. Not an apology.
Nothing. Complete silence.
So what that Al Jazeera, those Al Jazeera programs showed is there is manipulation of Of British politics.
We know it anyway, but it was in our face on film.
There is manipulation of British politics out of the Israeli embassy, which is simply, of course, a satellite of the center of the Israeli Zionist web.
Then you have a government minister, Priti Patel, The International Development Minister, who, as you mentioned, goes on holiday to Israel.
And while she's there, with a major manipulator in this country, was it Lord Pollock?
That's the guy, Lord Pollock, yeah.
Who is a major manipulator for Israel in the UK through this Friends of Conservative Friends of Israel network.
He goes with her.
I mean, are you always going to take someone like that on holiday with you?
I mean, yeah, okay. And then, you know, just by coincidence, she's on the beach one day having her holiday and in the next deck chair just happened to be Benjamin Netanyahu.
Yeah, so I met him.
It was just an accident. Fancy that.
Yeah, fancy that. No, of course, it was all planned.
And she goes out there.
She meets major Israeli officials, politicians and Netanyahu.
And according to reports...
She was seeking out financial support to make a run for the Conservative leadership.
So why would you go to Israel in search of money to run to lead a British political party?
Again, then you look at APEC in the United States, the American Israel organization,
which is the major or certainly the next major, if not major, lobby group in America.
In the world, I would say.
They're with this massive funding, which leads to it funding political campaigns of people
running for Congress, running for the Senate, and therefore getting political politicians
in America dependent on Israeli funding and Israeli campaigning support, and therefore
dependent on Israel.
And of course, as Cynthia McKinney, the former congresswoman in America, has said on your show, when you start running for political, major political office in America, you get asked to sign the pledge to Israel.
Sign the pledge, yeah. That you'll always support that what is in the best interest of Israel, which is what Israel tells you is in their best interests.
And of course, when she refused to sign it, She wasn't supported, and eventually they funded and supported someone against her to take her out of Congress.
So this is what is happening all the time, and this is why when Benjamin Netanyahu goes to speak on Capitol Hill, it is one of the most extraordinarily pathetic sights you could ever see.
Let's not forget this if you look at it on the surface.
You have this Prime Minister of a country of 8 million people in a world of 7.5 billion, and yet these people...
The people are supposedly elected to serve the interests of Americans.
250 million, 300 million, whatever it is.
300 odd million, yeah. They can't get off...
I mean, I've said in one of my earlier books when I was watching Netanyahu speaking at...
On Capitol Hill, that it was like the members of Congress and the Senate had springs on their bloody backsides, because every time they sat down, they sprang back up for another standing ovation.
It was extraordinary.
One after the other.
And what they're doing is basically they are keeping their funders and their masters happy by doing what their masters want, which is basically, with great civility, almost worship this tyrant that currently...
Is the leader of Israel.
So wherever you look, you see this influence, this manipulation of political events and situations in different countries.
You see the control of the media from which people get their perceptions in so many areas of that control.
And then you come back to these figures.
There are about 15 million Jewish people in the world out of 7.5 billion.
A considerable number oppose Zionism.
Most of the Zionists who identify with Zionism do not understand what it really is and what it's being done in their name.
Which leaves this tiny, tiny group who are doing what I call secret society Zionism or Rothschild Zionism or revisionist Zionism And they have this enormous, enormous influence all over the place.
Increased this year, by the way, with the arrival of Emmanuel Macron in France, which is extraordinary.
Talk about that. I mean, that's just amazing.
I mean, this guy worked for these people.
Well, it's a classic example of the power structure and how it works.
You have this man, Emmanuel Macron, who is an employee of the Rothschilds.
And he is involved in French politics with the government of Hollande, one of the worst prime ministers or presidents you could ever imagine.
And so, because Hollande is so discredited, I think he had the lowest opinion rating in French political history, and Macron's political connection to him...
It meant that if they put Macron forward as the candidate for Hollande's party to run in the last election, he was basically not going to win.
So they create a party for him.
A new one! Imagine that.
You don't have a party, but then suddenly they create one, and then you become the head of it, and it then wins the election.
I mean, hello. They also looked at...
The situation with the people that were going against him.
There was one guy who had a chance and they discredited him with some scandal.
This is what they often do.
And so what they did then was manipulate the situation where the French people were given a choice between Le Pen, who was...
Promoted through the media as some far, far right, almost Nazi option.
And this lovely man, Emmanuel Macron, who was the moderate centrist candidate, actually he was the Rothschild candidate.
And so by manipulating the polarities, lots of people voted for Macron, who would rather not have done, but they thought he was the least...
The least offensive.
Yeah, the least of the bad choice to Le Pen, who did all right anyway.
But... What it meant was that this Rothschild employee was taken from a political non-entity, given his own party, and then through this manipulation, made president of France.
And of course, one of his first speeches, especially when Netanyahu visited, Was to equate criticism of Israel and Zionism with racism against Jewish people, which is what they've been working towards all along.
So when you deal in facts and you expose the facts of Zionist manipulation, you are a racist and must be silenced.
Now, what comes then, Rich, as you know, Is these attack dog groups, many of which, most of which, are tiny in actually the numbers.
One man and his dog usually.
They seem to have access to the inner corridors.
Why? Because they are connected to the embassies in the countries, like the British Embassy.
So like the Israeli Embassy in Britain.
And their job is to...
Seek out anyone who is using facts to expose this manipulation and brand them racist so that they destroy their ability to be heard.
And that is what is happening.
And I take it as a compliment, frankly, that they are so desperate to silence me because I must be saying something right.
And what happens is people become intimidated by it.
Venues become intimidated by it.
And they pull events when these people tell them what I'm going to say when I'm not and never have.
And the venues pull the event, not even after consulting me and saying, is it true that you're going to say this?
In which case I'd say, well, I haven't said it before, so I think there's fair chance I'm not going to say it now.
And so you had efforts right up to 24 hours before to get the Troxy in London this week.
To cancel the event and destroy the evening of all the people who'd made all their arrangements.
They couldn't give a damn about anyone else.
And we did the event, which apparently was going to be this virulent, anti-Semitic...
Yeah.
Was the word Jewish or Zionism mentioned once in the evening?
I don't think so. Once.
No, not at all. Right? No, no.
But then you go on to the next venue and they try again and they try again and try again.
And this is why we don't put the names of the venues out anymore.
Which drives me mad, by the way.
I know, but what it...
I understand it, but it drives me mad.
Yeah, but it does two things.
First of all, it drives them mad, trying to work out where we're going.
But what it also does is it emphasises this...
vehement, disgusting, arrogant attack on the basic right to freedom of expression.
Indeed, the right, in the case of these people, the right not to say what they're claiming I'll say.
This is the irony. Ridiculously ironic.
Yeah, how ironic.
We're going to ban him for what he's not going to say.
But we're claiming, he says, so therefore that's enough to get the venue to port.
What part of we are infinite awareness, we are everything that ever was or is possible or ever could be, and identifying with race is ultimately silly because this is what we are.
What part of that do they not understand?
Well, this is the interesting thing here, Richard.
This is the staggering inversion, is what I'm saying is that What we are, what the eternal I is, is a state of awareness, a state of being aware.
It can be a minute state of awareness, it can be expanded awareness, it's just a choice which comes down to self-identity and perception.
I'm saying that...
What we identify with in terms of race, of colour, of religion, of culture, of gender, all of this stuff, is not who we are, it's what we're experiencing.
What we are are different points of attention within the same infinite state of awareness.
And you cannot...
You cannot have a more ultimately non-racial philosophy than that, or non-discriminatory relationship.
Explanation or perception of that.
Because I'm saying that whether you call yourself Jew or Islam or white or whatever gender, you are ultimately the same infinite awareness that I am and everyone else is.
And we get caught in self-identifying with what we are experiencing and believing it to be what we are.
What we are is the awareness that's having that experience.
And so here you have, and again, this world is inverted beyond belief, you have a situation where...
Someone with that philosophy, the ultimate non-racist philosophy, non-sexist philosophy, is called racist by people who are absolutely obsessed with race.
Let's be honest, they are racist to the bone.
In terms of their standing...
Listen, I know you might slightly disagree with me on this.
These are people who stood over the carpet bombing of Palestine in 2014.
And the open air prison, you know, you've been writing about this for years.
Their tolerance of that is by its definition, racism, real racism.
It's okay to do that to these people.
This is another irony, of course.
Yeah, what I call revisionist Zionism is the most racist creed on earth.
No one comes even close to that.
But it's an old technique, Rich.
What you do is you accuse people of being what you are.
And therefore the focus of attention moves to them and away from you.
And we have a situation which I find so sickening, so disgusting, whereby those who suffered in Nazi Germany, who genuinely suffered in Nazi Germany, are being used by these people, exploited by these people.
To promote and advance their own agenda today.
And to exploit the suffering of the Nazi era.
To silence people for your own agenda today.
Takes...
It takes me into areas where almost no word suffices to describe the scale of disgust that I feel about that.
And this is the irony.
Racists pointing the finger and calling non-racist racists.
It's exactly the same theme, which you see all through society now, of People like Antifa, who claim to be of the left, who while acting like fascists, Try to dub everyone that disagrees with them a fascist.
It's the same principle, the same theme.
Accuse people of what you are to demonize them so people don't actually turn around and look where the real racists are and the real fascists are.
These are the guys who say that violence is acceptable.
They openly say that violence is acceptable.
This Antifa nonsense, right?
Well, they say violence is acceptable, and they say that violence is acceptable because fascists are violent.
So, okay, that is a scale of childlike self-deception that you can hardly imagine, whereby violence is wrong, so we're going to be violent to meet the violence.
I mean, it's an idiocy.
Again, it's a form of deep psychological imbalance.
But, you know, you look at all these groups, you look at the Zionists who believe that it's fine to bomb with state-of-the-art weapons a defenceless, mass-populated area of land on which children and civilians live.
And to kill 2,000 civilians in 2014, 500 of them plus being children, and to justify that as defending yourself.
From rockets coming out of Gaza that hardly make a hole in a road.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. And I find it interesting, personally, that every time Israel wants another go at Gaza, suddenly rockets, just by coincidence, start appearing out of Gaza.
Yeah. And, you know, we're defending ourselves, but it gives them justification.
It's like...
It's like someone...
It's symbolically attacking you with a pea shooter and you returning fire with a Kalashnikov and saying I was only defending myself.
It's just an excuse.
And of course, organizations like the campaign against anti-Semitism were created And then became very influential very, very quickly.
I wonder why. During that bombardment of guards.
That's when they came up. That's right.
That's when we saw them. When, of course, a lot of people were looking at Israel and saying, what the hell is going on?
What are you doing? So, you know, we're looking at this network, and it's not to do with race, it's to do with an ideology.
And it's to do with manipulation of that, the agenda of that ideology into place, and the suppressing of the exposure of the ideology and that manipulation.
So that people don't see what's happening behind the scenes.
This is what's going on.
And we have to call it out.
We have to stop running away.
We have to stop being intimidated.
I don't have a racist cell in my body because my whole philosophy is that race and identification with race is a nonsense.
And a complete misunderstanding and misreading of the nature of the reality we're experiencing and the nature of we, the consciousness, experiencing it.
And yet, I'm dubbed a racist by the most racist creed on earth.
That's the irony.
And we mustn't be intimidated by it.
We must turn the focus of attention onto that which is truly racist and let them justify themselves.
And instead of running away and being intimidated into silence, that'll be the frickin' day.
We're going to take another very quick break so we can see where we are and then we'll come back.
Can't recommend highly enough everything you need to know but have never been told.
Available to order now on davidike.com.
Do order your copy now.
I think it's £12.99 on the site, I think, or something like that.
I mean, that's a steal, that.
I mean it is. It's 700 pages of hard-hitting journalism.
Do you remember journalism? Do you remember we used to have journalism when people would put together facts and develop a story?
Do you remember that? We used to have that some time ago.
This is a manual for would-be budding journalists, this connecting of dots.
Everything you need to know but have never been told.
Very quick break. Back in a minute with David Icke.
So, good stuff.
Back in a minute. Book launches are often hyped.
Then you open the first page and...
But David Icke's new book, Everything You Need to Know But Have Never Been Told, really will astonish you.
Thought-provoking and controversial, it's available now, so read a real page-turner.
Everything You Need to Know But Have Never Been Told, by former footballer and presenter David Icke.
Available exclusively at davideich.com.
Have you lost access to important data from a computer hard drive, mobile phone or other storage device?
Maybe you have a broken hard drive containing years of information or a smartphone that no longer works from which you'd like the pictures, movies and chats recovered.
If you would like to recover data from any type of digital device, including desktop and laptop computers, external hard drives, cameras, smartphones, NAS and RAID servers, then contact Data Clinic today at dataclinic.co.uk now.
There's a place, high in the mountains of Spain, a sanctuary where souls gather from all around the globe to learn about themselves and experience powerful changes in the way we see our world.
They become awakened to their gifts and their power to heal others.
Become part of this ever-growing worldwide family of unique, pure energy healing practitioners.
Discover how amazing you truly are.
Go to www.markbierski.com.
It could just change your life forever.
It's a great way to start.
For further information, go to h2oact.com.
Is your mind full of ideas, yet you struggle to put them down on paper?
Characters with no home, unfinished concepts that you always wanted to finalize, yet lacked knowledge and drive to complete.
The creative writing course from Creative Imaginings may be the long-awaited answer, designed to help you finish your masterpiece with better language techniques, detailed study of the character, plotted suspense chain, and valuable information to get published.
Don't delay your creation.
Complete your 100% online course Right, welcome back.
A very special programme.
I've been with David for the last 24 hours at the Troxy in London.
He's arrived in Manchester now, ahead of the book launch event for Everything You Need to Know but Have Never Been Told.
That takes place in Manchester tomorrow.
Sadly, no tickets available for that.
That's a sellout.
The book, though, is available to order now at davidike.com, $12.99.
Jesus, that is a steal.
700 pages of up-to-the-minute analysis of what's been happening in our world geopolitically and, of course, outside the five senses as well, amalgamating all that information, putting it together and explaining what is next on the agenda.
It's terrific stuff, it really is.
This is great, Ike.
This is totally unexpected.
So this is good. I'm enjoying this.
What have I done there? I've not put your mic up.
No, I'll do it again. Oh, hello.
Good stuff. I'm still here.
Yeah, it's not as if I've not done this a million times.
Right, so I was thinking, you know, because obviously when we began this about an hour
and a half ago, you talked about the fact that we have the evidence because the system
has not been able to hide it because as it gets to where it wants to go, it must reveal
it, therefore more people are aware of it.
And how more people being aware of it manifested itself recently was in the decision by people
in the UK to say no to Europe.
We want to leave.
That was definitely people rebelling against that.
You know, you've done amazing work on it over the years, the European Union.
Let's talk about that because what we're seeing now is like the Empire Strikes Back.
You know, Star Wars was the people saying we want out.
Now we're in the Empire Strikes Back, right?
Yeah, well, the more people understand about the way the whole system of control works and where it wants to go, the easier it is to read things and read what is almost certain to come.
So you have an agenda in Europe Which is for the centralization of power across the whole of Europe in the hands of unelected bureaucrats in Brussels who are themselves controlled by the hidden hand that works through them.
So the idea is to absorb more and more and more countries into this centralized tyranny so that more and more people are controlled by fewer and fewer.
That's the agenda.
So when, by a series of circumstances which they did not predict, Britain voted to come out, That was against this agenda in a very big way.
So on the morning, within an hour or less of the Brexit vote, I posted on the internet that this is just the start.
It's great to see this result, brilliant to see this result.
Well, this is just the start because these people are not going to go quietly.
Because the agenda is not to let anyone go, especially a country like Britain.
It's to absorb more, more.
So it was obvious that everything was going to be tried to stop it happening.
And so we have had the slowing down of the process that has been done on purpose.
And then we've had the manipulation and undermining of the Brexit process out of Brussels.
And we've also had, working together of course, the undermining of the Brexit process among those of the political class, left, right and conservative.
Or left, right and centre rather.
That don't want Brexit to happen because the political class is supportive of an institution in which national sovereignty is being deleted by the week, by the month. And they are saying that the...
The European Union that is doing that.
Is a good thing while complaining that they're not being given the right in the sovereign Parliament to decide ultimately whether we have a Brexit or not.
And you've got these people who are trying to get control of the final Brexit vote to be in the hands of Parliament because they know they can then have the final say to stop it.
And they're using the...
The need for a sovereign parliament to make that decision when they support the institution in Brussels that has been deleting the power of a sovereign parliament since we joined, thanks to the paedophile and Satanist Edward Heath, in the early 1970s.
So it's totally spurious.
And so you look at...
People like Jeremy Corbyn and these people in the Labour Party.
Jeremy Corbyn, for much of his, if not all of his political career, has spoken out against the European Union.
Now he's leader of the Labour Party.
He didn't come out against it during the campaign.
And he's saying things like he wants assurances from the government that they'll agree to this and assurances that they'll agree to that.
And then there's other people saying, wanting assurances that we're going to stay in the single market.
Delay, delay, delay. Delay, delay, delay.
And also, as someone rightly pointed out in a parliamentary debate I was watching the other day, Words to the effect of if you're in a negotiation and you go into a car showroom and you say to the salesman, I am not leaving this showroom without buying a car off you.
I.e. we are going to stay in the single market or we're not going to leave without a trade deal.
Then is that salesman going to give you a good deal?
No. He's going to say, well, I've got the control, the power here because this guy is going to buy the car anyway.
But if you say, well, I've looked at a series of cars and I've come in here and I want you to give me the best deal you can before I decide if I'm going to buy one here or somewhere else.
Then the guy's going to give you a deal because he knows that there is an alternative you have which is walking out of the showroom without buying a car from him.
So when you're negotiating with the European Union over an exit deal and I think there's a very different way I would have negotiated personally which I'll come to in a second.
Then what you say is we're going to negotiate In a situation where we are not going to guarantee that we are going to accept anything.
We're not going to guarantee that we're going to do anything.
We're just going to negotiate and we'll see how it goes.
And what should be happening and should have happened from the start, at least this, Is to have said to these bureaucrats in Brussels, we will negotiate with you, but we're not going to negotiate on the basis of there are green lines that we won't cross.
We're going to negotiate with you.
And if at this exit date, which we're giving you, there is not a deal, then we will just leave and that will be that.
Now, what people are saying in Parliament is, oh, we can't do that, it'll be economic suicide.
No, it wouldn't, because of what would happen.
We have a massive, massive trade deficit with the European Union.
Hugely important. And therefore, we owe them nothing.
They should be writing the cheque to us.
Absolutely. Because of all the transfer of wealth that has gone from Britain to Europe that's more than has come the other way.
And if you said from the start, this is the date we're leaving, and if we don't have a deal, then we're leaving anyway, then you're going to get the great corporations of the European countries who have a trade profit with Britain, Who are going to be knocking on the door of these bureaucrats in Brussels saying, get your freaking arse in gear.
They'll be bumping them off, mate.
Yes. They'll be bumping them off.
You cannot allow Britain to leave and we don't have a trade deal.
Who's going to lose?
We are. And therefore Britain would go into the negotiations and the clock would be ticking and you'd say, okay, let's negotiate.
But if the negotiations don't reach fruition, we're out and you're the losers and your corporations are the losers.
The corporations would be kicking and spitting blood at that.
Imagine what they would say to drunker.
I mean, particularly the CEOs of BMW, David and Mercedes.
They would be saying to drunker, do you realise what you're doing, man?
They will go to Japan.
They will go to America.
And they will do deals with those countries to get luxury cars from Ford, from Chevrolet, from Dodge.
Well, Dodge is Chevrolet, maybe it is.
I don't know. They will go to Hyundai.
We've got all these companies and do deals with them.
It can't be allowed.
You're spot on. But this is logic, isn't it?
It's basic logic. It's basic negotiation.
Yeah, yeah. But it's not happening because they're throwing spanners in the works all over the place.
And you know, we have a political class that has no interest in the will of the people, that spouts on about democracy while abusing the very idea of democracy.
You've got the Vince Cables in the Liberal Democrats and the ludicrous Nick Clegg.
You've got what I would call the rabble in the Labour Party who doesn't seem to know what they want or what they think.
And then you've got all the Blairites in the Labour Party who absolutely don't want Britain to leave the club.
You've got people like Blair...
Operating in the background and anything that Tony Blair wants, the global cabal wants and therefore it's bad for anyone who is subject to what he wants.
So the very fact that he's so vehemently Pressing for us not to leave the EU means that we should absolutely do that because anything Blair wants, we should be doing the opposite.
If we'd have done that in Iraq, of course, there'd be a lot less dead people and less chaos and catastrophe in the Middle East since.
And it's all the usual suspects that are trying to muddy the waters, slow it down and make sure it doesn't happen.
Why? Because they are servants of the system.
There are massive lawyers, David, aren't they?
Lord Kerr was the guy who drafted Article 50.
I mean, he's a pathological lawyer.
He's been debating, not debating, but he's been lecturing at universities and he's been saying, oh, Article 50, it can be reversed by either Brussels if they want or we can and the British people.
People need to know this. It's not set in stone.
This is a lie. I had the misery of having to read this crap.
It is explicit in its language.
Once Article 50 is triggered, there must be a negotiation done in two years.
If there isn't terms agreed, that country leaves immediately at the end of the two years.
Now the lawyers are telling people that white is black and black is white.
And outside of davidike.com, outside of one or two of the men and women who come on our programme, Nobody else is calling out these lies.
Nobody is saying in the media, listen, this is crap.
You know, we go and that's it.
We're gone. Job done, you know.
Drives me mad, this. Well, the idea that in a world of so many people and so many countries and so many markets that we can't exist without being controlled by bureaucrats in Brussels is absolutely insane.
But it's this...
This fear of the unknown, which is pressured and manipulated, that people feel that you can't exist and make your own decisions with your own borders anymore, there's got to be some supernatural national control system, is ridiculous.
But so many people believe it because they're frightened into believing it.
But the great thing was that The majority of people in the referendum rejected it, even though the entirety virtually of the political class was trying to terrify them into line.
They went their own way, and it is a sign, another sign, that people are rejecting this control system in the sense that they realize that That you couldn't get a cigarette paper, really, between the positions of the parties when you really break it down and wade through the rhetoric and the image-making.
You're basically looking at the same single political class.
And when they want something, we should want something different because it's not in our interest that they operate.
I must point out Jazz, our gorgeous German Shepherd dog, is playfully...
Rubbing David and licking David's hands.
She remembers David, of course, from London when we were making TV in London.
We've got about 10 minutes left on this if we're going to get this so that we can turn it around for repeats and for two hours.
Everything you need to know but if never been told is available to order now at davidike.com for £12.99.
Jesus Christ, when you think of books in shops and the prices they're charging for books these days, it's an absolute steal, it really is.
Get a copy for somebody who's Just starting to look into this information.
It's really terrific.
Right. What's it like?
You know, I was thinking yesterday, 25, 26 years is a long time.
It is. I mean, I know in the grand scheme of things it isn't.
But for you... What's it like now, putting this book out, after all the books you've put out, all the talks you've given, the thousands of interviews you've done on television and radio around the world, the talks.
How do you feel now, as opposed to five years ago, ten years ago, fifteen years ago?
Are you still as excited about doing this, getting a book out to people, as you were when you put your first book out?
Yeah, and I'm putting this book out in a very different environment.
It's certainly a different environment in relation to me.
Because, you know, for a long, long time, I was putting the books out and a number of people were reading them, but they were real fringe communication.
In the sense that the vast, vast majority didn't know they existed and wouldn't have been interested anyway because Ike's a nutter.
So it's a very different environment now where people from all directions and all areas of society are starting to look at this information, come to the events, go to the videos on YouTube.
And I've had a number of...
Experiences as I've gone through this week of people coming up to me in the street in different situations who were very, very kind in what they said and about the information, who were from so many different walks of life and backgrounds, you know. I was...
I was walking through the security at Edinburgh Airport and this security man came over and had a chat.
He was a white Scottish man.
And then I bought a fridge magnet from Duty Free.
I went to pay for that. You love your fridge magnets.
I have one for everywhere we've been in the last 18 months on my fridge.
It gets harder and harder to open the door.
You've been everywhere. And there was what appeared to be a Sikh man with the turban and the beard and a big Scottish accent.
And he said, oh, I watch the videos and what have you.
And then this day goes on and more and more people, different walks of life, were stopping me in the shopping mall and what have you.
And I just kind of It was a day which kind of just put into my face how all the different aspects of society, different belief systems, different religions, different cultures, were actually looking at this information.
I found that extremely encouraging because that's what we need to do, Richie.
These different groups that are given labels, labels called religions, belief systems, genders, whatever, we've got to put the fault lines down and we've got to come together and realize that we're all in this.
We're all in the gun sights of this.
And if we don't come together and realize that actually we have a common cause here, whatever label we give ourselves, including, you know, Jewish people who I'm supposed to be blaming for everything, we need to come together and realize that these are just labels.
These are just... Temporary experiences and come together and realize that actually there is a common cause here and there is a common goal which is enslaving all of us and enslaving all our children and all our grandchildren on an even greater scale than we have now.
And if we do that we've got a chance because it's the fault lines of division where the population is set at war with itself and That allows the few holding the strings of the different groups to impose their will upon all of us.
It really is time just to...
We need maturity.
And just, you see, if you look...
At the way something is going and you don't like it.
Well, isn't it a better a way to respond to that to go the other way?
Yeah, so let's look again As we come to a conclusion of what we kind of talked about some time ago the way that different Groups, whether it's sexual groups or religious groups or racial groups within the human family, are being broken up and divided and divided and divided in smaller and smaller groups down to the individuals being divided against individuals.
That is what they want to happen.
That is how they plan to get what they want.
So what we should be doing is not finding a solution.
The solution is looking at us in the face.
It's to go the other way and to heal the divisions through respect.
I mean, it's a simple thing.
I respect your right to have an opinion.
Now, if we're going to live in a balanced, fair society and a coherent society, then you need to respect my right to have my opinion.
And we can debate it and other people can then decide what opinion they choose to think is most valid.
And we have discourse.
Once you start saying, you cannot say this because it upsets me, you've created immediately a situation where something, some force now has the power to decide what can be said and what cannot be said.
There are laws that deal with things like urging people to be violent, urging people to attack this house or this group, incitement to violence.
There are laws dealing with this.
So when it's said, there are laws to deal with it.
But if you start snuffing out opinion before it's been expressed, Then you are in very, very dangerous territory.
And we're in that territory now.
If I have an opinion, I completely respect your right to have a different opinion.
End of story. What the heck could be wrong with that?
What is wrong with that, from the system's point of view, Is that means alternative opinions and alternative views and explanations to what they want the target population to believe Can be circulated.
That's why we have censorship on the basis of this can be said, but not that.
It's pure, purely about control.
And we break that.
We break that wall of censorship by refusing to be silenced, by refusing to be censored, and by Respecting everyone's right to an opinion, even though we may disagree with it.
Brilliant. Get everything you need to know but it's never been told.
Looking forward to tomorrow night, mate, in Manchester.
I can't wait for that. Thank you so much for that.
Brilliant day yesterday. Thanks, Richie. That was a real off-the-cuff make it up as you go along.