All Episodes
Feb. 26, 2026 - Dinesh D'Souza
40:06
The LEFT Has Lost the Plot! The Danielle Gill Show Episode 3

Danielle Gill returns to dissect the left’s weaponized outrage over ICE, contrasting their protests with Obama’s 392,000 deportations in 2010—including 195,000 criminals. She highlights extreme cases like Don Lemon’s church arrest and TikTok calls for violence against ICE agents, framing their selective condemnation as hypocrisy. The left’s demonization of ICE as "neo-Nazi" or "thugs," she argues, masks their own radical tactics, while conservatives face disproportionate backlash. Gill insists leftists must face consequences, like five-year sentences for Lemon, to curb activism and expose their double standards, revealing a broader pattern of lawlessness under the guise of moral superiority. [Automatically generated summary]

|

Time Text
Encouraging Engagement with Extremists 00:14:14
Hi, everyone.
I'm Danielle D'Souza Gill, and I am so delighted to be back on the podcast.
I know we've taken a little bit of a break, but we are reviving things again.
Dinesh went on some trips, traveling, and he's going to tell us a little bit about those this week.
But I am going to be hosting the show, and Dinesh will be on the show.
He actually will probably enjoy this even more because I'll be asking him questions, and that will allow him to be inspired to pontificate on those further.
And also, we'll be sharing kind of our thoughts on politics, culture, religion, all of that.
And I will be talking about all different kinds of topics over these coming weeks.
But today, we are going to talk about some really interesting things.
We're going to talk about the Don Lemon arrest.
We're also going to talk about the recent protests surrounding ICE.
We're going to talk about illegal immigration and what the left is really trying to do and how we as conservatives should respond in the wake of all of this.
All right, let's get started.
As much as we need to encourage leftists to live a life of tradition and happiness, if we just focus on encouraging them, we'll spend the rest of our days talking with nothing to show for our efforts.
Because the left is not listening.
They signal their lack of interest in what we have to say every day through their actions and words.
We've seen it with ICE protests, with the fact that they literally are trying to track ICE agents so they can wreak havoc on them.
We have seen 20 years of rioting on college campuses to censor the conservative ideas of speakers from the likes of Milo Yiannopoulos to Stephen Crowder to countless others.
They told us they have stopped listening when they put a bullet through Charlie Kirk's neck and cheered.
We know the left is no fan of free speech and debate, even if you approach them with good faith.
But when we limit our analysis to their ideologies, we end up right back where we started, trying to, you know, encourage them, trying to tell them these things.
And we should definitely keep doing that.
There is definitely a space to keep doing that.
But we also need to gather our own thoughts about how we should respond and what we should do in the wakes of these crazy things going on in the news.
And when we see them acting this way, we see that the left, they're actually inciting violence.
They are inciting rage in the heart of a seething wine box mom with lobotomy eyes planning her next TikTok rant.
We see it with the furry, young, like strange, I don't know, dudes who are on Discord, who are just listening to a lot of this leftist stuff that provokes them to do horrible things.
So here's an idea.
Instead of just trying to give them some good old encouragement, let us gather our thoughts because it is painfully clear that leftists are where they are today because they demand to live in a world free of consequences for themselves, but full of consequences for the rest of us.
We need to pull back from the mind games and start looking at the situation strategically.
Let's keep the focus on what they do, give them consequences, and then maybe they'll start to realize we all have to live by the same rules.
Now, let me explain what I mean later on in the show when we talk about Don Lemon, because he may actually experience some of the consequences of his actions.
Lately, politicians and media, which are essentially moving in lockstep on the left, they are both mouthpieces of much of the same ideology.
They mischaracterize ICE law enforcement actions as random abductions of people.
Well, yeah, of course.
They are arresting people.
They are arresting illegal aliens.
They are law enforcement.
They don't arrest dogs because they're ICE, not dog catchers.
So why use the word people?
Well, because if they said citizens, it would be untrue.
On its face, going full banshee over people being abducted is meant to point to something scandalous, even though it isn't.
ICE is enforcing the law.
When ICE arrests someone who isn't illegal, they are doing their job.
That's objectively good because the law is what we all voted for.
We all voted for massive deportations and the American people spoke loudly.
They made their voice heard.
And it is the duty of ICE, of President Trump, he's carrying out what he was elected to do.
We elected representatives to draft and pass laws in order to make sure that this continues to happen.
Unfortunately for the left, laws that are passed are something that they say, hey, we still want to stop this anyways.
They're being enforced.
That's Democracy 101 right there.
But the left says, oh no, we actually are the democracy, even though there's a small minority of them who are the ones who are protesting.
A small minority are the ones who are sitting behind their computers, typing up the articles on the left to make it seem like anyone who's right wing is totally demonized.
But now we have these liberals coming out all over.
They look like they're straight from a psychopath character generator for comic books.
They have the simple jack haircut, big glasses, septum piercings, a look of desperate loneliness in their eyes.
They mince and pout and shriek when their TikTok face alarmingly closes up to the camera as they suggest to their viewers to inject ICE officers with nerve agents.
This is the part where I play Dora the Explorer and ask the audience the important question.
Do you think these media and political mouthpieces refer to the targets of ICE arrests as people by accident?
Do we think that it's a slip of the tongue that they're using a word that makes it sound like any of us could just be scooped up by an ICE agent while strolling through the aisles of the grocery store?
This is not an accident.
The left is not confused.
They actually view illegals as, I don't even want to say equal to American citizens, but greater than.
They view illegals as more important.
They say, hey, if you're an illegal, you can come in, you can go to a sanctuary city, you can get on all the free programs, get on all the welfare, we'll give you housing and so on.
Meanwhile, if you're an American, you're gonna have to work hard every day for every dollar that you get and you're gonna pay your taxes and that's gonna go to fund these illegals.
You're gonna have to pay a crazy amount of rent if you live in one of those sanctuary cities and you're gonna walk around the city in fear for your life because there are all these kind of criminals and hoodlums walking around everywhere.
And even if you do well enough to live in a safe place, even then we're just going to tax you more the more that you earn.
And meanwhile, you're going to pay insane amounts for health care.
You're going to still have to worry about your kids' education.
You're still going to have to worry about whether there will be social security for you later on, for example.
But if you're an illegal, everything's great.
Everything's awesome because you came into this country and you not really gonna give to the country.
You're not really gonna contribute, but you can take.
You can just take, take as much as you want.
And guess what?
We have a political party that's representing somewhat half the country who's gonna advocate for you.
And they're gonna make sure that you're their prized possession because they know that if they advocate for you, you're gonna vote for them.
Democrats know that illegals, they're not gonna vote for Republicans if they become citizens.
So any kind of path to amnesty, amnesty, light, anything like that, that's just gonna put more quivers in the arrows of the Democrats.
We have seen that many, even people who came here legally, many immigrants who came here legally, they don't support illegal immigration because a lot of them waited a very long time to come into this country.
And a lot of them work very hard and do pay taxes and they don't want illegals coming in.
Not to mention, many of them actually get on the dole and others in the family do get jobs.
They do make money.
And so these people, you see them and you're like, how does this illegal have all of this nice stuff?
How do they have iPhones and all of this?
And it's because they figured out how to game the system.
And so we on the other side need to look at this and say, we need to get smart.
So we could sit here and try to encourage liberals and say, hey, you're liberal.
You know what?
You shouldn't believe this.
And this is, you know, not really what ICE agents are doing and so on.
But that doesn't work.
That doesn't penetrate.
Now, of course, we got to win over independence.
And of course, in our real lives, we're going to, you know, win people over, encourage them, and so on.
But we also need to strategize and figure out how are we going to operate?
Because we won the elections.
We won in 2024.
We won the Congress, the Senate, the presidency.
And so the American people expect mass deportations.
Now, these deportations are underway.
They're doing an amazing job.
President Trump has been deporting, deporting, deporting.
But of course, there are more to deport.
We are still deporting.
And so as this happens, and the left is so just focused on putting this laser scrutiny on ICE, they're demonizing ICE.
We can't back down.
We can't all of a sudden lose our morale or make any compromises or say, you know, we're going to back away, backpedal in any way, because anytime you have a crime committed, which really was the illegal coming into the country, that was the first crime.
If you want to say that was the apple being eaten by Eve, so on, as kind of an example.
That was the first crime.
And so from there, in order to even rectify that, it's like a price has to be paid.
There's going to be some stuff going on because we have to get them out.
Now, fortunately, many of them have actually left voluntarily because of programs to encourage self-deportation, which is great.
You can leave on your own and that is even better.
Go ahead.
But of course, we do have a lot of people still here and they aren't confused.
It's not an accident that they're here.
Many of them came here without their families.
And so they're probably either just working, taking our jobs, or they are committing crimes.
And so we need to make sure that we are not losing our backbone when it comes to them leaving.
The good thing is illegal immigration is not a popular issue.
It was one of the main reasons that I think Trump won 2024.
And so whenever we start feeling like, oh, you know, is this the right thing?
No, stop.
It is the right thing, purely based on principle, but also a lot of people agree with it.
When we see the left, we see that their own words, their actions form a plot hole that reveals the truth.
It's not like they don't know what ICE does.
It's not like ICE all of a sudden just started and ICE never existed before this and they're just like these deer caught in the headlights.
No, they didn't have any complaints when ICE was doing its job under Obama.
Obama actually deported a lot of illegals.
The Obama White House was lionized for ramping up efforts to arrest illegal aliens.
One Obama press released brags, quote, in fiscal year 2010, ICE set a record for overall removals of illegal aliens with more than 392,000 removals nationwide.
Half of those removed, more than 195,000, were convicted criminals.
The fiscal year 2010 statistics represent increases of more than 23,000 removals overall and 81,000 criminal removals compared to fiscal year 2008, a more than 70% increase in removal of criminal aliens from the previous administration.
So when Obama was president, a more than 70% increase in removal of criminal aliens was something to boast about.
So why all the hand-wringing now from the left?
The left is not suffering from a sudden, you know, reversal or sudden finding of conscience.
No, the only thing that has changed is the president.
Now we have President Trump.
We have a Republican administration.
Here's another question.
Do you think the anti-ICE protesters also don't understand the truth?
They do.
You can bet they do.
We know this because under Obama, none of these same people, these same people were alive.
Many of these same people were not upset about ICE increasing its enforcement efforts.
We even saw that Tom Holman was even someone who was looked up to back then by people on the left.
It's not that they don't know.
It's not that they've changed.
It's not that they don't care.
No one who uses the carefully chosen word deporting people when talking about ICE operations is being honest about what they're protesting.
Weaponizing Speech 00:09:27
What they're doing is weaponizing their speech to get you to engage with them in an argument over particulars.
Meanwhile, they throw bricks at the heads of ICE agents.
You see how that works?
They know they're on shaky ground intellectually because they have to choose their words carefully.
They know they're behaving badly.
We know they're behaving badly.
They know that we know they're being bad.
So what stops the cycle?
Consequences.
Not debate or argumentation, but cold, hard consequences.
Handcuffs.
Why is this the only path forward?
Because that's the consequence of actions.
And that seems to be the only language that they speak these days.
We need to follow their analysis to its logical conclusion.
When we talk, when we communicate, it is to convey a sincere thought, an idea, a belief, an opinion.
But that's not how leftists view communication.
For leftists, communication isn't just about idea sharing.
It's about manipulation.
It's about changing the truth.
Watch this clip from Catherine Maher, the former head of NPR, talk about how truth is something that she is actually against.
But one of the most significant differences critical for moving from polarization to productivity is that the Wikipedians who write these articles aren't actually focused on finding the truth.
They're working for something that's a little bit more attainable, which is the best of what we can know right now.
And after seven years there, I actually believe that they're onto something that for our most tricky disagreements, seeking the truth and seeking to convince others of the truth isn't necessarily the best place to start.
In fact, I think our reverence for the truth might become, might have become a bit of a distraction that is preventing us from finding consensus and getting important things done.
Now, none of that's to say that the truth isn't important.
The truth obviously exists.
It's at the core, or the search for the truth, is at the core of some of our greatest human achievements.
It can animate and inspire us to do, learn, and create great things.
But I think in our messy human hearts, we also know that the truth is something of a fickle mistress and that the beauty of the truth is actually often in the struggle.
It's the reason that we have so many sublime chronicles of the human experience because there are so many different truths to be explored.
And so in this spirit, I know that the truth exists for each of you in this room.
It also probably exists for the person sitting next to you.
But the thing is, the two of you don't necessarily have the same truths.
And this is because for many of us, truth is what we make when we merge facts about the world with our beliefs about the world.
Each of us has our own truth, and it's probably a good one.
When you understand this about leftists, that they truly do not value truth.
Not just, you know, maybe they were a leftist from the coexist days who says, oh, I don't care.
You know, I'm a relativist.
Everything is true.
I don't know what's true.
I'm an skeptic.
No.
The leftists today are anti-truth.
They see truth as the enemy because if you know the truth, they can't manipulate you.
They can't control you.
And the truth to them is like poison, which is why for us, the truth is like sunlight.
The more we can get the truth out there, the more it will actually derail the left.
Because for the left, they see it as if you don't know the truth, they can put out all these headlines from places like NPR, they can influence you.
But if we know the truth, then none of that works.
So when you understand this about leftists, every annoying habit they've displayed over the past century becomes crystal clear.
For example, you can call out leftists on their hypocrisy every day.
There are channels on YouTube that are dedicated to that.
Probably 95% of memes, which I find hilarious, are about leftist hypocrisy.
But in terms of response, it's a dead end.
And leftists feel absolutely no shame about being called out on their hypocrisy because they knew they weren't telling the truth to begin with.
Why would you feel bad about being logically inconsistent when you never had any intention to?
Does a liar feel shame when being called out for lying?
Not really sure, especially if it was their goal to lie to you.
What about when leftists go full-on hardware update?
One minute they're publicly decreeing anyone who would take the vaccine because it was developed when Trump was president, they're anti-vaccine, and split second later, when the auto pen gets in the office, they want to make being vaccinated mandatory, of course.
So they've never been serious about some of their political stances.
We've seen them change.
They don't believe in them one way or another.
And for them, it's anti-truth.
They want to manipulate you.
That is the purpose of left-wing media today.
So we need to really follow a lot of these stories, follow the Don Lennon story to make sure that we see that the consequences for their unlawful actions actually take place.
Not by our own hands in any way, but simply just through the justice system, through legal action taking its course.
Well, I am delighted to welcome back our favorite guest, of course, Dinesh.
Thank you for joining us.
It's kind of funny, Dee, to have you at the host end and me as your guest, but I think it's going to work well.
So glad to join you.
A lot of fun to interview you.
Wanted to start today by asking you about what I guess everyone is really talking about right now, especially the left, because they've been attacking ICE agents.
They've been going after just the concept of ICE after deportations.
Of course, the left has never liked this idea.
They were against it when Trump campaigned on mass deportations.
And it seems like they've, you know, they kind of hooked on to that guy who they were like, oh my gosh, you know, he should have been here, but we deported him.
And so they've kind of tried to pick these little stories and say, oh, this is an example of how this was like egregiously violating this American's rights.
But with this recent ICE shooting, they have kind of decided to make that their new cause to champion behind this recent killing.
And so wanted to get your reaction to really just how should we as Republicans respond?
Because we do know that the American people stand behind mass deportations.
We know that illegal immigrants, they have to go home and we're not going to back away from that.
And at the same time, the left seems to be winning the messaging war, at least with independence.
And we still have some time for the midterms, but how should we respond?
Because we can't back down from mass deporting, nor should we.
So what should be our reaction to this?
And what is kind of your reaction to the situation?
The left is against these deportations because the left has created this whole phenomenon of mass illegal occupation or invasion of this country.
They are consciously doing it.
They were doing it for four years under Biden.
And there was a lot of it that went on even before Biden, but there was an escalation under Biden of gigantic proportions.
Now, they know, the left knows, that this is a popular issue with the country.
People don't think illegals should be here.
They know that illegals have broken the law just by being illegal, not to mention any crimes committed on top of that, not to mention all the free loading off of the taxpayer.
So there is a wall of resistance to illegals.
The left miscalculated this, I think, in the 2024 election.
They thought, for example, that, you know, Hispanics would be in favor of illegals and would not vote for Trump.
And it turned out, no, Hispanics who are illegal, who've been in America for a long time, they don't like illegals either.
So the left realized that the old, just simply making the point or trying to conflate legal and illegal, calling them all immigrants, these sorts of familiar tactics, people are now alert to.
So the left realized we need, what we need is to misrepresent the situation by finding kind of extreme cases, horror stories.
Reports Of Weapon Discharge 00:14:55
And the horror story approach is to highlight a case and then pretend like it's typical when it's actually not typical at all.
And so they go in search of these types of cases.
And so one way of looking at it is the left is looking for really sympathetic illegals.
And they can say, oh, look, this is a family of eight.
And look at how cute the kids are.
And look how nice the family is.
And these are not criminals.
Say, yes, true, they came over the border.
So that's one way to do it, is to find a sympathetic case study.
The other way to do it is to find ICE villains.
And this is sort of like cops and say, look, this guy is going too far.
And this guy used force when force wasn't warranted.
And what you're going for is not just that this is a bad apple, but that this is the way ICE is.
ICE, in fact, is a neo-Nazi operation.
These people are just randomly rounding up people.
And this is the nature of what's going on.
So this is not deportation being conducted in a kind of orderly, humane, and lawful fashion.
This is just basically armed thugs running amok.
So this is why these particular cases have gotten highlighted attention.
Now, in the most recent case, you had a situation where you had a guy who had a gun.
And for some reason, well, the gun seemed to have been drawn according to the video that I saw.
If you look at it from a certain angle, you can see that he's drawing his gun.
There was also some reports about firing or about some sort of a discharge of a weapon.
It's not clear if it was his weapon or somebody else's weapon.
And the problem for these ICE agents, I think, is that they are in these highly fraught situations where you have protesters coming with weapons and you now have to gauge what is a real threat and what isn't and do it instantly in a matter of seconds.
So I think some of the details of this need to be sorted out, but it looks like what happened here is that there was a rational fear that these ICE agents were in danger.
Very similar, by the way, to when the other activist drove the car straight into the ICE agent.
And I mean, put yourself in that position.
Aren't you going to feel that your life is threatened when you have a deadly weapon, namely an automobile that is hurtling toward you?
And that in fact hits you.
It's not just it's coming in your direction.
The automobile struck the ICE agent.
So I think these are all cases where we have to realize that there's not going to be any kind of deportation without the left trying to stop it.
And so it's going to be kind of ugly, I'm afraid.
And Americans are going to have to make up their mind.
Do you have the stomach to do the things that need to be done to get these lawbreakers out of the country?
By the way, the Trump people are not even trying to remove all illegals.
They're focusing on criminal illegals, focusing on people with records, or focusing on gang members and pedophiles and rapists and murderers.
And so, and even then, you've got leftist activists, some of them paid, probably some of them not, in a sense, fighting to protect these lawbreakers and criminals and pedophiles and rapists.
It's really something quite a quite a surreal thing to behold.
Yeah, but I think we need to just deport all the illegals because to be honest, all these kind of protests, things that can things like this going on, I mean, it's really just for ICE in general.
It's not because, oh, you deported someone who's illegal, but not a criminal.
It's because they're doing mass deportations and they don't like that on the left.
Same thing with them not liking the police because even the police, the police are, you know, kind of monitoring mostly, let's say, Americans.
And when they are trying to stop bad guys, the left doesn't like it.
The left doesn't like it because of race or just because in general they hate police.
So I don't think we can back down at all as far as how bad was your crime if you're an illegal, because it just being an illegal is a crime.
So you need to, you need to go.
You need to be deported.
And these leftists, they're also adding fuel to the fire, clearly.
I mean, that's kind of their goal.
They want you to have these ICE trackers that talk about how, oh, we need to figure out where ICE agents are.
And they're kind of trying to make people think that these ICE agents are like the Gestapo.
So they're encouraging this kind of violence.
I think this is where the Justice Department and the FBI need to look to see if there is a way to bust all of this as a kind of organized crime racket, because obstructing law enforcement is a crime.
So what if you have an elaborate network that includes prominent Democratic officials, elected officials and also appointed officials who are creating systems to detect when ICE is going to show up?
So what you have then is you have state government, people at the state level, let's just say In the government, in the Democratic administration of Minnesota, or specifically in the city government of Minneapolis, and they're thwarting a federal operation.
Can they be charged for obstruction of justice?
And if so, and I'm talking about not just can the brick throwing protester be charged, I'm talking about can Tim Walt be charged, and can the lieutenant governor be charged, and can elected officials be charged if they can be shown to be a part of a criminal conspiracy to obstruct federal enforcement of the law.
I agree with you that whether it's crime or whether it is illegals, or even whether it is this latest incident where Don Lemon and a group of activists kind of barge into a church, these people truly think that they are above the law.
They truly think that there is no way to go after them because there's actually no precedent for going after them.
Leftists have enjoyed a certain type of immunity.
And I'm happy to see that under Army Dillon, under Pam Bondi, for the first time, they have arrested Don Lemon.
They have arrested that Nakima Williams.
But think of it: a previous Republican administration would be scared, oh, she's black.
She's going to claim that she's a slave all over again.
And sure enough, that's what she did.
Nakima Williams is like, when I looked at those shackles, I thought of myself as a slave.
So she was doing the slavery routine that would have worked 10 years ago.
And this is why the Bush administration, previous Republicans, would have been terrified to do this.
But Trump is not.
And I think the MAGA Republican Party is not.
We recognize that they've been doing it to us, and it's about time that we do it to them.
Yeah.
Plus, you know, the liberals, they don't have any problem when they're in power barging in to, you know, go after January 6thers or pro-lifers and so on.
They're happy to weaponize the government against those people.
But then when it's police or ICE agents who are enforcing the law, they freak out and act like they're the ones who are living in some kind of police state.
Exactly.
They, in fact, are far more ruthless about it.
In fact, their approach is indict first and then they go looking for evidence.
The January 6th defendants were rounded up almost immediately.
The Justice Department didn't wait to collect information, build a case against each one of them, because if they had done that, it would have taken a year or two years for them to have their indictments.
They were indicting people within days of January 6th.
And so, and similarly, under the FACE Act, now the FACE Act prohibits any kind of interference with pregnancy centers, but it includes houses of worship.
So look at, you know, the women who were prosecuted under the FACE Act, pro-lifers, they were standing at an abortion clinic with the rosary praying, and this was considered an interference with the pregnancy center, in this case, with the Planned Parenthood.
The intrusion by Don Lemon and the gang of activists was far more blatant.
I've never seen any pro-life group do anything even resembling that at an abortion clinic.
And so it's really important that we not just arrest these people, but that they get long prison sentences, in fact, similar to or exceeding the sentences that the pro-life women got, because their conduct is more egregious.
Yeah.
And that would probably shock him, honestly, to be in the situation.
And I'm sure right now he's thinking to himself, oh, wow, you know, this is awesome because they're coming after me and nothing's really going to happen to me worse.
Do you think he's going to see any jail time?
Well, this is the key that they, if they don't do that, if Don Lemon, for example, gets a slap on the wrist or if they basically just make a show of arresting him and they let him go, this will then make his profile bigger than ever.
He'll become, he'll have a martyr status by the fact that they went after him and he will basically say, I beat him.
Look, they tried to go after me and I got no jail time.
So we only win if we are truly able to put Don Lemon on his back, which is to say, if he get, let's just say he gets a five-year sentence, which by the way, would not be out of line considering what the pro-lifers got for doing far less.
Now that will shut him up because that will be, that's a serious, that's some serious jail time, prison time.
And he will definitely not come out of it ahead.
But the key is to pursue these things, as Harmit says, to the ends of the earth.
Anything short of that, and it ends up being a self-defeating maneuver that backfires on you.
Do you think that other liberal journalists might be taking note considering this going on?
Or do you think, you know, not until more happens?
Well, I mean, their instinct is to rally together.
You can see like Jim Acosta is posting on Lemon every day.
Their idea is we need to all gang up and defend Don Lemon to the hilt because the principle we need to establish is that we can do this to you, but you cannot do it to us.
The First Amendment protects us.
It doesn't protect you.
And so the left would like to establish and consolidate this double standard and get even Republicans to go along with it.
Now, that's not going to happen.
But the difference, I think, between, let's just say, the FACE Act is applied to pro-lifers versus as applied to Don Lemon is this, that when the FACE Act was applied to the pro-lifers, they were in jurisdictions like Maryland, where the judges were liberals and the jury was liberal.
And so they were basically in the lion's den.
They were facing hostile juries and hostile judges who were only too happy to give them really stiff sentences.
But imagine now having a judge in Minneapolis.
Imagine going to a jury in Minneapolis.
We're talking about the blue part of a largely blue, well, a blue state.
And so it's going to be more difficult for the Trump administration to get a unanimous jury to convict a Don Lemon, to convict these activists, even if they are in clear violation of the law.
There have been cases where the judge instructs the jury in such a way, the jury thinks, well, you know, these people are on our side.
We're going to let them go.
So either they vote to acquit or you get a hung jury, which means you have to then retry the case if you have, if you're going to do it.
Yeah.
And I feel like this in a way goes back to the illegal immigration issue and just the radical left, because if the radical left keeps populating the country with these crazy illegals and then they give them citizenship, they're going to be the people who basically sit on these juries.
They're the people who are going to be ended up voting.
They're going to be the people who the left has appropriated.
And so then we think to ourselves, oh, well, the system is fair because we have a judge, we have a jury, we have all of this.
But then we realize the left has been infiltrating from the bringing people in from the outside to allow them to keep doing this.
Look, the left, you know, in our country, if you were to do a sort of a breakdown, the left would be a relatively small percentage.
I'm not talking about Democrats who would be close to half the country, maybe 45%.
I'm talking about the left.
The left is maybe 10%, maybe 12%.
But how do they try to multiply their ranks?
They try to multiply their ranks basically with two groups.
One is the illegals, and the second is the radical Muslims.
And sometimes these two groups overlap, but they don't have to overlap.
You could have a radical Muslim that comes legally.
But the left basically is counting on the fact that the radical Muslims will, for the most part, behave and vote just like the left.
And they are counting on the illegals to sort of do the same thing.
This explains why they are so dug in on this issue.
They are determined to protect these illegals, even when it looks bad for them, even when it's politically, it seems to be, they seem to pay a price for taking such an extreme position.
They still do it.
And they do it because I think they think that the benefits to them in multiplying the ranks of the left are so great.
Wraps Today's Show 00:00:28
Wow.
Well, we're running out of time, but thank you so much for joining us.
And we will see you again next time.
Until next time.
Well, that wraps up today's show.
If you enjoyed the show, make sure to come back tomorrow.
We're going to get more thoughts from Dinesh and we're going to talk about some more news going on.
Make sure to find me on social media.
I'm at Danielle DeSouza Gil on all the platforms: Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Rumble, True Social, X, everywhere.
Export Selection