Dan Bongino defends Donald Trump's rhetoric while detailing a successful American rescue in Iran driven by superior SIGINT and stealth, contrasting this with alleged NATO failures. He critiques Democratic impeachment plots and California's economic collapse, citing $700 gas prices and a $90 billion high-speed rail shortfall as proof of liberal inefficiency. The episode further warns that birthright citizenship enables national security threats from foreign enemies and concludes by promoting the Rumble app and other shows. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Get Control of Your Finances00:04:03
All America, all the time.
Sit down, buckle up, and get ready for the Dan Bongino Show.
Folks, it doesn't bother me that Donald Trump posts on True Social the way he does.
It doesn't bother me at all.
Now, I mean, listen, I don't say that objectively.
I'm obviously a Trump supporter, know the president, worked for him.
So I'm not pretending to be some, you know, judge or juror in the case.
It's completely objective and.
I'm just telling you, it doesn't bother me at all.
I know there's a big, like, internet rebellion over his true social post about taking out Iranian bridges and possibly ports and open the effing straight.
I'm not telling you what to think.
I just want to be absolutely clear.
This is not like the Dan Bongino show where we have to align 100% of the time on everything.
That's not this show.
This show is an opinion based show.
I have an opinion.
You can have yours.
It just doesn't bother me.
I want to get to that in the beginning of the show.
Also, obviously, an amazing rescue this weekend.
We don't leave our people behind, name the show that today.
We just don't.
Our American military, this is why I just, I'm telling you, man, I have nothing but.
When I have my hierarchy of groups of people, I respect, love, and adore.
The military's at the top all the time, every time.
No one is going to displace them in the pole position there.
No one.
Because you guys and ladies out there just have balls of stone.
You just do.
Nobody could pull this off.
However, obviously, you've heard the story rescue of the airman, the pilot, and the WSO, WSO, weapon system officer.
But there were three things that enabled us to do this.
No other country on earth could have done it.
There were three very specific things.
I'm going to get to all of that stuff.
Big show for you today on a Monday.
Welcome back.
Hope you all had a happy Easter and a wonderful weekend.
Spring's coming around.
Nice weather is out in Florida this weekend.
Got a little bit of too much sun, if you can probably see in my face.
Hey, free speech, it's under pressure again.
Go get Rumble Wallet.
Rumble Wallet puts financial control back in your hands where it belongs.
You can tip creators instantly.
You can hold Bitcoin and USAT as well.
Download the Rumble Wallet at wallet.rumble.com.
Do it today.
Get a hold of your financial control.
Today's show is also brought to you by our good friends at American Financing.
Listen, the cost of living is high.
It's exhausting at times.
If you've been leaning on credit cards lately just to cover the basics like groceries, gas, and utility bills, you're essentially paying a survival tax of 20% interest or more.
My friends at American Financing, they have a better way.
A better way.
A better way.
I sound like a New Yorker kid.
Did you hear that guy?
They have a better way.
But American Financing has a better way and a better way.
They're helping homeowners tap into their equity to pay off high interest debt with mortgage rates currently in the fives.
That's awesome.
On average, American financing is saving their customers $800 a month.
That's huge.
That's nearly $10,000 a year back in your pocket.
That's big life changing money.
It takes just 10 minutes to find out what you could save with American financing.
There are no upfront fees and no obligation to talk to a salary based mortgage consultant.
Here's the kicker.
Start today and you can even delay two mortgage payments.
Think about that.
American Financing, they're America's home for home loans.
Give them a call.
Write this number down.
It's 888 994 7660.
That's 888 994 7660.
Or visit them online.
It is a dot net address at Americanfinancing.net slash Bongino.
Americanfinancing.net slash Bongino.
Thank you, American Financing.
Fellas, ring that bell.
Oh, yeah, it was a delayed bell there.
Allies Failing the Alliance00:14:51
I mean, like, what was it, Rocky?
Ding, ding.
Folks, I don't really care about language.
I know a lot of people do.
That's why I've been trying to kind of tone down the language, the expletives on the show.
I'm really trying my hardest, okay?
I explained this to Jasmine this week.
Did I not?
And not an excuse.
Jasmine doesn't curse, or neither does Paula, by the way.
Justin, once in a while.
But when you grow up in New York, like I did, and Donald Trump did, in New York, not an excuse.
I'm just telling you in advance.
Cursing's not like a thing.
I don't know how to say it.
It's just like, I'm going to go over there.
They got a flag.
Cursing's just like how people talk.
It's almost not like cursing.
It's just like, I'm not telling you it's a good thing.
So people get upset.
Oh, not presidential, whatever.
The stuff doesn't bother me.
Put the true social post up that caused all this pseudo controversy.
Tuesday will be power plant day and bridge day, all wrapped up in one in Iran.
Tuesday, obviously, being tomorrow.
There'll be nothing like it.
Open the effing straight, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in hell.
Just watch.
Praise be to Allah, President Donald J. Trump.
People lost their minds over this.
This is how people from New York just talk.
People from Boston tend to do it too.
Sometimes people from big cities just curse.
I'm not making excuses for anyone.
If you're offended by it, you're allowed to be offended.
I'm just telling you, it doesn't bother me.
We are dealing with the world's largest terror regime, a group of people trying to acquire a nuclear weapon who have killed thousands of Americans in terror attacks around the world, who would kill you tomorrow if you dared enter their airspace as a civilian with your LGBTQIA pride flag.
You'd be thrown off a building instantly.
You wouldn't even land in a plane, they'd blow the plane out of the sky.
I didn't even realize cursing was a bad thing until I moved down to Maryland and I was at a house party one time and I accidentally dropped an F bomb and everybody stopped talking and looked at me like, oh my gosh, did he just say that?
He's dealing with savage thug, the savage thug, the mullah theocracy over there.
These are, folks, these are animals, these people he's dealing with in the Iranian mullah class.
I just don't care.
It doesn't bother me.
I just do it out there in the beginning of the show because it was, I couldn't believe it this weekend.
All these people, like, oh my gosh, you believe this guy?
Dropping an F bomb in a true social post.
I mean, can you imagine like Patton and MacArthur?
You don't think they dropped an F bomb here or there?
All right, moving on.
So, an unbelievable mission this weekend.
Folks, this is like storybook stuff.
Like, what happened?
We're engaged in this unbelievably successful now, what is it, five, six weeks, seven weeks military operation in Iran.
We've taken out most of their Navy, a good chunk of their ballistic missile capability.
We've decimated their air defense sector.
However, they do have equipment on the ground that can still obviously take down our airplanes.
It's still very dangerous.
You know, yes, we do have air dominance.
You know, when you see the amount of sorties and missions they've flown over Iran relative to the amount of enemy contact, like what happened this weekend when they took down an F 15, the percentage is so unbelievably low.
That is what air dominance looks like.
However, air dominance doesn't mean zero risk.
It's not zero risk, okay?
We lose this pilot, Good Friday, rescued by Easter Sunday, in incredibly what.
Reads like it's not even like a Netflix show because you believe, ah, that's too much.
That's too much.
No one's ever going to believe.
Well, it happened.
It's not a Netflix show.
It's real.
Pilot was injured, winds up secreting himself into a mountain crevice, stays alive.
Special operators go in there.
We wind up taking fire in some helicopters.
An A 10 takes some fire and showing you we leave no one behind.
They were taking out roads.
They were jamming signals.
They were making sure that no Iranian terrorist.
Got anywhere close to this pilot and they got him out.
It's an incredible story.
Here's a quick Fox News hit by Trey Yinks discussing what happened.
I want to talk about on the other side of this three things that enabled this to be possible because there's no other military on earth, none, that could have pulled this off deep in Iranian territory.
Check this out.
Yeah, absolutely.
This was an incredibly complex operation.
I've been speaking with Israeli officials asking what role the Israelis played in this operation and they continue to just give credit to the American forces saying that when one pilot in the region is shot.
Down.
It's everyone's pilot and job to rescue them.
What took place was nothing short of extraordinary.
The CIA was using deception tactics on the ground to make the Iranians think that they'd already located the pilot.
Remember, this second crew member was inside of enemy territory for almost 48 hours, and the Iranians were not only actively looking for this crew member on the ground, but they were also offering a reward of thousands of dollars to any Iranian civilians who could capture him and then take him into IRGC hands.
The United States knew this was taking place.
And so, as these Iranian forces approached this crew member where they were hiding along a mountain ridge, according to Fox's Jennifer Griffin, there were strikes that took place against the Iranians to not only ensure that these forces couldn't reach the crew member, but also ensure that on the ground they couldn't get forces close to this location.
Remember, when these pilots or crew members are ejecting from a plane, they have the systems within them that allow intelligence to track their location.
But they have to be very careful, understanding they often just have a sidearm with them and they're not able to defend themselves.
Solely on the ground.
But what the president talked about last night in his post on True Social was that this crew member was never alone.
The United States of America, including the president himself and top military leadership, each and every hour at the White House tracking the location of this crew member and then sending in hundreds of special forces, dozens of U.S. military planes to identify the exact location and ultimately rescue this U.S. service member.
Pretender 2020 in the chat.
I'm more concerned about the plane being shot down than the naughty language in the tweet.
Yeah, me too.
Me too.
In my triage of concerns this weekend over this holy weekend and the Christian calendar, I promise the naughty language in the tweet was not even in the top 100.
It was like, hey, we got this guy on the ground, this American Patriot pilot.
Like, can we just get him out?
And like, who cares about the language in the tweet or the true social post?
Who cares?
My gosh, when like this, Existential crisis with people trying to acquire nuclear weapons who would love to blow up the United States and destroy a major city, and we're worried about him dropping an F bomb.
Folks, there are three things that enable us to do this.
Number one, our ability to intercept and manipulate signals intelligence is just unlike anyone else on earth.
Obviously, the details of it are not for public consumption.
You can probably figure it out.
It's not, it's a well known secret.
We just have the ability to be an eye in the sky and an ear in the sky like no one else.
So there's almost nothing you can do.
When you, SIGIN is short for signals intelligence.
Most of you know, I don't mean to sound like condescending or anything.
Human is human intelligence.
There's all kinds of, Mazint, there's other stuff as well.
However, when you combine human intelligence on the ground and signals intelligence, basically there's nothing the Iranians can do, very little they can do without us having a good idea.
In advance, when it comes to rescuing this pilot.
So that's number one.
That's a staple of U.S. intelligence gathering technology, and it's peerless.
It's peerless.
We have no equals in it.
Combine that with our stealth technology.
Now, this was daytime op.
We own the night.
The United States and the special operators will tell you these guys own the night.
They just do.
This was a day op.
But still, you still want to be able to avoid certain.
Certain enemy detection systems.
We have stealth technology like no one else.
We just do.
When you combine that with the ability to read and process intelligence and kind of know what the enemy is doing on the football field, you know it's a run play before the enemy even snaps the football.
It's just hard to beat us.
Not impossible.
I told you, there's still risk in all of this.
It's war.
And then when you layer on top of that, item number three signals intelligence, intelligence in general, stealth technology, and you overlay logistics capabilities.
Ladies and gentlemen, the United States has military experience like no one else on earth.
I'm not telling you have to agree with every single theater mission we've been in.
I certainly was not a supporter of the Iraq War.
I've said it many times.
However, it is invaluable experience.
And when our people in combat are in combat, I'm rooting for them.
That experience matters.
I'll never forget the last year being in government, people coming in and talking about all kinds of drone technology.
And we had this contact at another agency who said, I don't want to hear anything about drone technology unless you've tested it in Ukraine.
Because everything you're telling us it's going to do, there's 100 variables on the battlefield you haven't taken into account yet.
Well, how do you take into account those variables?
You got to get it on the damn battlefield.
That's how you get battlefield experience that our military is second to none at.
They have the logistics capabilities to do these things the beans, the bullets, all that stuff, the supply lines.
Think about it.
They set up basically an airfield in Iranian territory to get this hero pilot out.
We got one of our planes stuck.
They wound up blowing up, I think it was two C 130s, and then replacing them with three more.
How many people can do that?
But it goes to show you the extent to which our United States government and the Trump administration, we will, there's no amount of money or logistics we won't expend to get our people out.
We're not the death to the America Mullah crowd, they don't give a damn about their people like that.
That's us, man.
That's us.
We are different.
American exceptionalism is real.
You're different too.
You live in the greatest country on earth.
We don't treat our people like expendable suicide, homicide bomber baggage.
Oh, I can kill yourself.
We don't do that.
These three things make a world of difference, and you're going to see moving forward as the operation starts to wrap up, likely in the coming weeks or maybe a couple months.
I don't know.
Again, I'm not in on the war planning, obviously.
However, President Trump has been pretty clear that he had a limited set of goals.
A lot of those goals have been met.
I think we're going to hear today at 1 o'clock some additional guidance going forward, and hopefully, we wrap it up relatively soon.
Well, what about the Strait?
Ladies and gentlemen, the Strait's important.
No doubt about it.
I get it.
The Straits of Hormuz are really important.
Global petrochemical traffic, hugely important.
However, if our partners did you see that Ari Fleischer tweet?
Sorry, I don't mean to get off topic, but Ari Fleischer used to be the old White House press secretary and the Bush era.
Did you see the tweet?
It went nuclear this weekend.
Everyone was talking about it.
Ari Fleischer, who's not known as like a big bomb thrower at all.
He's like a Bush era Republican guy, nice enough guy.
I know Ari, very nice guy.
I don't think we share all the same politics, but he put out this tweet basically saying, Hey, man, to NATO out there, not helping us out with the stray, not letting us use airspace and bases we built in your country to keep your country safe.
Like, this is it, man.
Again, this guy's not a bomb thrower at all, Ari Fleischer, not even like a little bit.
If you've ever met him, he's the most calm, level set, you know.
He doesn't get emotional about anything.
He was like, hey, Donald Trump is right about this.
These NATO countries that are not helping us out, like, this may be the red line for us.
And gave Trump a bit of a pat on the back, suggesting that he's the first one to call out what this is.
This is not an alliance anymore.
We needed our allies in an alliance.
Alliance, allies, and they're not acting like allies.
Oh, there you go.
I didn't even put it in the show.
This is the tweet if you want to see it.
It was April 3rd, 6 15 p.m.
He basically notes when this is over, Western NATO will never be the same.
Spain, England, France, and Italy have sold this out.
I'm telling you, like, this is a huge thing for him to put out.
He is not a bomb thrower at all.
And he's telling you the truth.
This is not an alliance if they don't act like allies.
And, folks, it's about time we started speaking the truth.
It's really frustrating when the United States, You know, I haven't seen it on the other side.
Like 80% of the heavy lifting in the law enforcement, counter terror, counter espionage space, and in the military space are done by the United States.
And what do we get back?
We don't even get back 20% of the effort, we get back like no percent of the effort.
That's bullshit.
And I'm glad he called it out because there are people on the whatever you want to call it, establishment side of the Republican Party, who may not listen to me or others, but they're certainly listening to him on X.
And that's why it's important to get allies in this movement, actual allies, ideologically, who start to call this stuff out for what it is.
This is a big moment to change.
Ethos Life Insurance Break00:03:11
I'm going to take a quick break and I want to get back to this.
Folks, when the Democrats tell you who they are, please listen to them.
Ro Khanna, that Democrat goon congressman, who's the biggest fake, by the way, out there, total loser.
This guy's a complete thug.
Don't buy his nonsense at all.
This guy pretends to be this bipartisan, like, free speech guy.
This guy's nothing but a congressional thug like everyone else.
He's already talking about what they're gonna do if they take back the house.
And you better listen to him.
Quick break, I'll get to that.
Hey, when the dollar's convertibility into gold ended in 1971, gold was fixed at $35 an ounce.
Fast forward to today, and it's reported that the U.S. dollar has lost over 85% of its purchasing power.
Gold, on the other hand, has increased in value by over 12,000%.
That's why many central banks are buying gold at record levels.
That's why major firms hold significant positions in gold.
But it starts with education.
My friends at Birch Gold Group, B I R C H, have just announced their Learn and Earn Precious Metals event.
The free online event rewards you.
For learning the basics of investing in precious metals, sign up to get free silver on your next purchase.
If you qualify, you can get even larger incentives as you go along.
The more you learn, the more you can earn.
But you must act now.
This special event only runs through April 30th.
The dollar lost its anchor in 1971.
You don't have to lose yours.
Text my name, Bongino, B O N G I N O, to the number 989898 to join Birch Gold's Learn and Earn Precious Metals event by April 30th.
Check it out.
Text Bongino to 989898 today.
Message and data rates apply.
Thanks, Birch Gold.
Today's show, also brought to you by Ethos.
Becoming a parent completely changed how I thought about responsibilities.
Going to do it for you if you're not a parent yet, too.
You start realizing how fast life can shift and how important it is to have things in place so your family isn't left scrambling if, God forbid, the unexpected happens.
That's what got me thinking seriously about life insurance, not as a scary topic, but as part of basic planning.
What really stood out to me about Ethos is how simple they made the process.
Everything is 100% online.
You can get a quote in seconds, apply in minutes.
And for many people, coverage can start the same day.
There's no medical exam.
You just answer a few health questions online.
That alone removes a lot of the friction that keeps people from even starting.
Ethos helps provide financial security, and that matters.
It's designed to fit real families, lifestyles, and real budgets.
Protect your family with life insurance from Ethos.
Get up to 3 million in coverage in as little as 10 minutes at ethos.comslash bongino.
Just 10 minutes.
Take 10 minutes to get covered today with life insurance through ethos.
Get your free quote at ethos, E T H O S. ethos.comslash bongino.
That's ethos.comslash bongino.
Application times may vary, rates may vary.
Visit ethos.com for details.
Thank you, ethos.
Life insurance.
Check it out.
Okay.
Identity Politics and Rage00:15:27
When the Democrats tell you who they are, especially lunatics like this guy, Ro Khanna, who's one of the biggest fakes up there, By the way, Rohanna.
I've never heard a peep from this guy again, but all that stuff was going on.
He claims to be like this big warrior for transparency.
He's full of crap.
Here he is telling you hey, man, Donald Trump, they are going to impeach him.
The reason I'm bringing this up here, by the way, in context of the True Social Post in the beginning, is they are prepping war crimes nonsense right now.
And I guarantee you that True Social Post, everybody's offended about the language, whatever.
I can guarantee you that's probably going to be Exhibit A. Why?
Because they basically tell you what they're going to do.
You should just listen to them.
Check this out.
The House and possibly the Senate in November, there's a better than even chance Donald Trump gets impeached again.
Absolutely.
He should be impeached now.
I mean, he's taken us into a disastrous war, threatening war crimes in Iran in terms of knocking out people, plants, and knocking out electricity.
And the Democrats will impeach him once we take back the House and should impeach him for all the things he's done.
And depending on the Senate, he may face conviction if we get to 60, especially if his numbers keep going down.
The Epstein issue continues to be a vulnerable issue.
Oh, here we go again with the Epstein issue and this guy who, by the way, I never heard from when the thing was going on and we were busy processing all of that.
Never heard a word.
Amazing how all these people care now when it comes to impeachment.
Incredible.
The guy's the biggest fraud out there.
Folks, I promise you, if they win back the House in this midterm election, there will be another impeachment.
Now, some of you, I read some of your feedback, whether it's email or on the website or comments, and I've heard some people fairly enough.
Say, you may have seen this.
You think, no, they're not going to do that again.
It backfired after Trump 45.
All of these criminal trials basically got him reelected again in 47.
I don't believe it.
I think he would have got reelected regardless.
I think he's got a gift.
He just does.
Politics is, he just has a nose for this stuff.
However, there's no question it didn't help.
If it would have helped, you know, he probably wouldn't have swept like he did in that presidential election, all the swing states.
They do, they, you got to understand, like, folks, that is a.
Ridiculous assertion.
I don't mean to be a jerk about it.
You're pretending the Democrats are principled if you believe that.
Like, surely they wouldn't do that again.
It backfired the weaponization and lawfare so badly that Trump kicked their ass in a presidential election again.
They're not thinking that way.
These people are not thinking that way.
They're thinking in terms of power and retribution because to be a Democrat is not to think in facts and data.
It's to think, it's to, excuse me, it's to not think and embed yourself in emotion only in rage.
That is what it's about.
They don't care about, hey, you did X and Y happened.
You weaponized the government.
You engaged in prolonged warfare against Trump.
He kicked your ass in an election.
Therefore, don't do X again.
That led to Y. That's not how they think.
Now, why?
Why do they think only in rage and power and retribution?
Because it sells to their base.
There is something about Donald Trump.
People call it TDS, whatever it is.
There is something about Donald Trump that leads to this, what I call show your ass theory, where If you want to be credible and have like street cred, you want to be down, whatever, in the Democrat Party, if you want to be seen like AOC and Bernie, like you're, you know, you're an authentic, you're, you know, you're it, you're genuine, you're the real deal, you have to say increasingly deranged things about Donald Trump.
You have to basically show your ass to the public.
And then people will celebrate you on Twitter and elsewhere, which has become dominated by rage bots.
So people get this artificial elevation of like, I call Donald Trump Hitler and everybody said they love it, so everyone must love that.
They don't.
They are going to go out and impeach this guy.
You're dealing with a party that deals only in emotion.
They're not anchored in any principles.
They will flip their principles on a dime.
I was just reading an article, was it Friday in the Wall Street Journal about?
Do you remember that salt deduction, state and local taxes?
The salt deduction was a tax cut for wealthier folks on their state and local taxes.
They could write them off.
Now, you say, well, why would the hell would the Democrats?
Want a tax cut for, for wealthy people.
Because it was blue states that have really high state and local taxes.
I thought the Democrats don't like tax cuts.
The Democrats don't have principles.
I'm trying to tell you this.
The Democrats care about power.
A lot of rich liberals in these blue states were bitching about their salt, uh, deduction not being high enough that they had to pay more taxes and they changed their mind.
The only reason I bring it up is now there's another way, a bill moving through in New York that's gonna limit the salt deduction again to make them pay higher taxes.
What the hell?
First, they don't want tax cuts.
Then they want a tax cut.
Now back again, they don't want the tax cut.
They don't believe in anything.
They believe in rage and power.
That is the whole bedrock of collectivism.
The idea that you should organize and centralize power to abuse it.
Folks, we have this contrast of visions going forward, as Thomas Sowles pointed out in his book.
We got to make a choice in these midterms and these presidential elections.
I had a friend reach out to me this weekend and said, You know who you are.
He's a pretty famous guy, but he was an athlete, super nice guy.
He was talking about, Hey, do we feel like all this is fixed?
I said, Hell no, is this fixed?
Government's never fixed.
If men were angels, you know, Federal's 51, we're not.
You get another group of people in power, ladies and gentlemen, they bring their own people in there.
People are policy.
The only thing you could do with government is put guardrails on them and hope they hold.
Bad people are going to do bad things.
The only thing you could do is get rid of as many bad people as possible.
We have this massive conflict of visions going forward.
And I've never seen it more summed up by the whole leftist.
Blanket ideology on race and identity politics.
Ladies and gentlemen, they don't give a damn about any of this stuff.
Okay?
They don't care about LGBTQIA.
They don't care about American Indians versus Asians versus Jewish versus Muslims.
They don't care.
They care about pitting people in corners and getting them to fight each other so that in the midst of the chaos, they can come in like the government and rescue everyone.
Here's this article from last week by this guy in the Wall Street Journal.
I'm gay, but that doesn't make me queer.
Talking about how.
He's like, hey, man, I'm gay and I took all these courses in college and all that stuff and learned that.
And I started to realize they're full of crap.
They don't care about gay rights.
These terrorists in the Middle East throw gays off a building.
They love them.
Here it is summed up in two quick videos back to back.
First, I want you to listen.
You know, we have the Artemis mission now.
They're out there.
We're doing just amazing things out there in space, thanks to the Trump team and Isaacman and formerly Sean Duffy, who was running NASA.
And we're back to doing things the United States does big, bold missions.
A lot of it's in conjunction with the private sector, which I think is a good thing.
I don't think the government should be the lead agency on a lot of this stuff.
But there is a role for space when it comes to defense.
And there's no doubt the government has to be involved.
Space is the new warfare frontier.
Trust me, the government needs a footprint in space.
Here's Sky News covering the launch on Artemis.
And I want you to notice what they're focused on on the launch and tell me.
If this is a party you want to be a part of, check this out.
Yeah, and they are going for all humanity this time, you know?
Apollo was all white men, and this time it's not.
And I think that really speaks volumes for the journey that NASA has been on.
And this is a much more representative crew.
And you can feel emotional about that.
Holy Moses, folks, do you have any idea how many minorities have been to space?
Not that it matters, because this guy doesn't give a damn.
He doesn't care.
This is all these people care about.
And it's not because they actually care about minorities or people who are gay.
They see it as a weaponization tool to keep people pissed off as victims so that everybody hates each other and they can come in as the government and fix it all through social welfare programs and other things.
Now, I want you to listen to one of the astronauts, this gentleman, Victor Glover.
He's asked kind of a similar question about this identity politics stuff.
And he's like, hey, man, can we just start like focusing on like human beings and stuff, like doing big things?
Like, what the hell do we, which vision?
I don't know this guy's politics.
I don't care.
I'm just asking you a question as my audience, trying to prove the point.
These people don't care on the left about any stuff.
It's all about inducing rage in you.
Oh my gosh, white men in space.
That's all they talk about all the time.
They don't have anything else.
There's no principles here.
Check this out.
It is a big question, and I want to highlight, I guess, maybe one facet of this is the tension, I call it.
I live in this dichotomy between happiness that a young woman can look at Christina and just physicalize her passion or her interests, or even if it's not something she wants to do, she can just be like girl power, and that's awesome.
And that young brown boys and girls can look at me and go, hey, he looks like me and he's doing what?
And that's great.
I love that.
But I also hope we are pushing the other direction that one day we don't have to talk about these first, that one day this is just.
And I listen to this that this is the human history.
It's about human history.
It's the story of humanity, not black history, not women's history, but that it becomes human history.
Amen, man.
I mean, I don't.
If the media would start calling this out, which I know is ridiculous, the media is obviously on the other side, large chunks of it are left wing ideologues.
If they would start calling this stuff out for what it is unnecessary division and total bullshit, I think we could move on, but we can't because they love it too, because it fits their ideological power grab.
They're part of this whole movement.
I saw this interesting tweet and wokeness.
Now, this is a 2007 study, to be clear, but I saw this and I, if diversity, right?
Diversity, guys, everyone in the audience, pay quick and close attention to this.
If diversity has benefits, it should show in research.
Facts, correct?
You should be able to show data.
Data, show data, show us some evidence.
Diversity, all that this produces some tangible benefit.
Put that tweet up.
This is fascinating.
N Wokeness put out there.
I wonder why this study got buried.
This was just from the screen, but the study is an older study back from 2007.
They found in this study, and they wondered why it got buried.
Listen to the conclusion the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and less likely they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects.
In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in homogeneous settings.
The study, the largest ever on civic engagement in America, found that virtually all measures of civic health are lower in more diverse settings.
Anyone in the chat surprised by this?
That when you're in a community of people you chose to move in who are like minded, civic minded, this got nothing to do, by the way, if they look like you, so just cut the bullshit.
We're talking about just people who feel generally the same way in a community.
Is it shocking to you that you would feel a greater bond to a community of people who feel kind of the same way you do about faith, family, and freedom?
This is not unusual, this result.
Diversity.
Diversity for what?
For the sake of what?
Answer the question.
For the sake of what?
You can't answer the question.
You have no evidence to back this up at all.
And again, I can't emphasize enough.
If we had a sane media ecosystem that would call these people out and ask basic questions like that, by the way, that would say, hey, you keep talking about diversity.
What exactly do you mean?
What do you mean?
You mean like skin color, religion?
What about socioeconomic status?
What about country of origin where you came from?
What about that?
What kind of diversity are you talking about?
And can you produce to me evidence that that actually does anything?
They can't.
This is why trust in the media is at an all time low.
Again, these are facts, folks.
This show produces actual data.
Put up that rabbit hole, D.
This just about popped this weekend through.
I told you, nobody trusts these people.
Because they see in their real lives that everything they've been told is true by these folks is nothing more than a media talking point.
Share of people who said they had a great deal or fair amount of trust in mass media.
Look at it, down to 31%.
Folks, that is stunning.
Think about what this chart indicates here for those who process information and use reason, i.e., this audience, right?
You're talking about seven out of 10 people who go and analyze.
Media information, media, their one job, the American media, is to get you facts, inputs to process a proper output, right?
That seven out of 10 people have no trust in these people at all.
You would think this would be a wake up call for these folks, but they have no ability to self reflect at all.
I'm going to tell you one of the most illuminating experiences I had in my early career in government on the Secret Service side, when you were a new agent, right?
On the president's detail, forgive me if you've heard the story before, but they stick you with the press.
When you're on what they call PPD, Presidential Protective Division, they stick you with the press because it's where you could do the least damage until you get a feel for kind of the flow, the go with the flow of how the president's detail works.
You can do the least damage with the press.
You spend a lot of time with the press as a new agent, like a lot.
Folks, some of the conversations you would hear these people having were so humiliatingly stupid that I swear if it was said in front of a camera, you'd never trust the media again.
These people put off this air that there's this highbrow air, nose in the air air that they have a set of facts you don't have when in fact they have nothing.
They're really stupid.
A lot, not all of them, but a good chunk of them.
Some of the stuff they'd be, I couldn't believe it.
And just the stuff they would do on like the, oh gosh, like the press plane and stuff, they don't do it anymore because the cell phone carries.
These people are horrible.
Cutting Through Media Bullshit00:06:11
Here, we haven't heard from this guy in a while.
They have no ability to self reflect at all and say, hey, how are we contributing to this malaise that the left wing media says we're in?
Here's Jim Acosta.
We haven't heard from this guy in a long time.
He's apparently upset at some possible leadership changes at CNN, concerned, get a load of this, that they may become a propaganda channel.
I'm not kidding.
This is actually real.
Talk about a lack of self reflection.
Check this out.
That's something to be worried about because it doesn't take a genius to figure out that they're going to try to impose.
That same kind of top down editorial mandate over at CNN that, hey, we're going to be a little bit more MAGA.
We're going to be a little bit more Trumpy.
And, you know, I mean, I think that's dangerous.
You know, we don't need to have propaganda networks in the U.S. Holy Moses, is this real?
And the answer is yes, it is real.
He actually said that.
This man has no ability whatsoever to process new inputs and create an additional output.
He probably still believes the Russia collusion hoax is real.
He can't shake his priors no matter what.
And I'm telling you, the mark of an imbecile is the inability to process new information.
As life chronologically moves on, new information and stimuli come in, correct?
Every day you learn something new.
If you cannot change an opinion, no matter what, based on a set of facts, contrary to your prior opinion, you are the problem.
A propaganda network.
Folks, there's a reason seven out of 10 people don't trust him.
You would think that would be a moment of reflection.
I mean, think about this in your business.
Imagine, like, Justin had, he always wears hooded sweatshirts, this guy.
He loves his hoodies, right?
Justin starts Justin hoodies or whatever it is.
Thermostat is 64 right now.
What's that?
The thermostat is currently 64 degrees.
That's why I'm wearing hoodies.
He doesn't like it that I keep the studio at 64 degrees.
I'm always getting, I'm sorry.
I got them in Italian blood.
It runs a little hotter.
I'm sorry.
So he is always, it's Florida.
Justin always looks like Han Solo in Empire Strikes Back in the beginning.
What is that thing?
Is it a tauntaun or something?
Andy, put Justin in a thing.
Get the lightsaber.
Put Justin in the tauntaun.
Warm him up.
Imagine he starts this hoodie company selling Justin's hoodies, and seven out of 10 emails he gets on the customer service line like, hey, those hoodies really suck.
Justin's a smart guy.
Well, what sucks about it?
I don't like the drawstring.
It keeps breaking, and you change it.
The media has been at roughly 30% approval for eons now, and they have no capability to say, maybe we should start doing facts.
And get away from the propaganda.
They don't.
They don't care.
Here's another great story the media will likely ignore, by the way, in the Trump era.
It's okay to say you don't agree, by the way, media folks, with the Donald Trump economic policies, with his war policies.
That's the job of the media, a fair media, is not to be, you know, a mockingbird.
It's not to parrot things.
But you should also put out the other side of the argument, too.
This tweet this weekend, I saw a rapid response from the Trump team out there.
The paring down of the government workforce, something that's been talked about by Republicans, Tea Party folks, and others forever, and has really never happened, is finally happening.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is a piece of good news.
Rapid response 47.
Under POTUS Trump, the federal workforce has been reduced to its smallest level since 1966, the lowest share of the total labor force in over a century.
Folks, that's an amazing story that hasn't happened in decades since 1966.
We've had a bloated federal workforce forever.
You've got this guy, and everybody's worried about he dropped an F bomb in a tweet.
How about producing actual data?
The jobs numbers that came out on Friday.
I want you to smile a little bit today.
It was Easter weekend.
Everybody's coming back.
Spring break's kind of over.
So people are filtering back to work, filtering back into the chat.
It's good to see you back here.
Put a smile on your face.
We are in an unbelievably good spot right now.
Yes, there's a war going on.
Yes, we should keep our eyes open.
Yes, there's a dangerous terrorist situation.
Yes, the economy's got some bumps in the road.
But the jobs numbers that came out on Friday, if you missed the show, were just staggering.
Here's Kevin Hassett, one of Donald Trump's economic advisors, very smart guy.
Here's Hassett discussing a couple critical items as to why this happened, because it's not an accident.
The job numbers were 178,000, which blew away projections that expected 60,000 jobs.
That is a huge number, an enormous number.
But he talks about a couple of things I've mentioned over and over that should put a big darn smile on your face.
The fact that Donald Trump has removed mounds of red tape that cost you money to get your business going, he has deregulated large portions of the economy.
And he's also focused on a growth environment rather than this oppressive Joe Biden big government environment by creating more federal jobs and fewer private sector jobs.
Check this out.
I can say that this is an absolute blockbuster number.
It's one of the best numbers that you've seen in a long time.
And what it shows is that all of the cumulative policies that President Trump has pushed the no tax on tips, no tax on overtimes, making the old Trump tax cuts permanent, deregulation, $18 trillion in new investments in the U.S. through our trade deals, all of that stuff.
Plus, a big reduction in the trade deficit has created an enormous amount of momentum for the US economy.
And so that momentum cannot be upended by a temporary Middle East skirmish.
Okay, I want to get to that.
Again, these are the things the media won't tell you.
I promise when we get blips in the economy, if there's some obstacles and some bad job numbers, we'll cover them.
We'll explain to you the reason why and let you formulate an output yourself.
This is the fact show, it's not the bullshit show.
You want that, you can watch mainstream media outlets.
Liberal Utopia vs Reality00:15:02
Folks, we do have this conflict of visions going forward, though, and you have a choice to make in November.
Now, I don't, this is a global show.
We have a good audience in Australia, we have an audience in Canada, we have an audience in Asia.
It's a global show, and it's focused on basically US politics.
Fairly obvious.
Hello, Captain Obvious.
Thank you.
I don't typically get into too many like parochial regional politics issues.
However, this bit on California here is important because it's not a regional parochial issue.
When I discuss, as I've been for this show, this conflict of visions moving forward, the weaponized ideological left obsessed with power and the free market constitutional right obsessed with prosperity and growth, that conflict of visions is best summed up by showing you a real world example of data.
When one vision is fully implemented, California, can we all agree, everyone, Jasmine, everyone else, California has a super majority of Democrats.
Republicans have almost no political power whatsoever in the state of California outside of isolated pockets.
None.
Not in the legislature, certainly not in the governorship.
The court system is dominated by liberals.
California is their liberal, air quotes, utopia.
It's a dystopia, but they'll tell you it's their utopia.
Gavin Newsom's going to run for president.
You have the governor of California, of course.
You have this example right here.
Here is a subset of data A, red states.
Here's a subset of data B, which is blue states like California.
Why would you want this?
Here's a tweet by CBS Sacramento.
CBS.
CBS, not a right wing outlet, okay?
Finally acknowledging that the reason you're in California paying $700 for a gallon of gas, hyperbole, but you get the point, is not price gouging like the liberals keep telling you.
This is CBS.
They note here's why.
And no shocker, it's California gas taxes, labor and business costs, environmental programs, red tape regulations, and the state's unique fuel blend are driving up baseline prices.
Now, it's.
You're sitting here on the show going, no Sherlock.
There are liberals reading this for the first time.
You have a choice in the midterms.
Do you want, keep that up a second, Justin?
Do you want more of this?
Because this is what happens when you have a supermajority of liberal lunatics.
Do you want higher taxes?
If the answer is yes, and you want to pay more for gas, vote for Gavin Newsom and the left in this election.
Do you like high labor and business costs?
Yes, I love paying more for labor and business.
Okay, vote for the Democrats.
Do you like excessive and ridiculous environmental programs?
Vote for the left.
What about red tape and regulations?
That's your guy, Newsom and the Democrats.
You have a test case in front of you.
You have a natural experiment right now.
This is what liberal utopia looks like.
Here, you want another example?
President Trump put this video on his True Social.
This is a woman in California.
At a fire hydrant, you're like, what is she doing?
And he's like, is she putting out a fire?
She is not.
If you're listening on Apple or Spotify, thank you.
I always, uh, uh, enjoy the audio show as well.
You should check that out.
But you should tune in at the 48 and a half minute mark where you can watch this lady apparently like doing like her laundry in a fire hydrant or something.
This is California.
I'm not telling you red states don't have a homelessness problem and don't have things like this happen everywhere.
But the question is not do they happen or not?
The answer is yes, everywhere.
The question is to what degree on the margin.
California has one of the worst homelessness problems in the country.
I thought this was utopia.
Your gas prices are the highest.
You're being suffocated by red tape.
You got people doing their freaking laundry in a fire hydrant.
They have like a Tide Pod in there.
I mean, they've even washed it.
Where's the detergent?
Oh, so what?
Ladies doing a wash in a fire hydrant and they pay $5,000 a gallon again.
What's the big deal?
Folks, even the things they do, even the things they do that they claim are like no brainers.
California's like, man, we should have high speed rail.
Like the Japanese, high speed, everybody loves high speed rail.
They do?
So if they love high speed rail so much, then how come the high speed rail project they've done in California?
They can't finish it.
It's way over budget.
And by the way, the customer base for this thing is probably going to be crap.
Because if people wanted it, a private sector company would have already moved in.
This is just a quick snippet from 60 Minutes, no less.
Ever since Barry Weiss went over, they've been doing more of these mainstream stories.
It's still CBS, so you got to be cautious.
However, here's 60 Minutes interviewing these two knuckleheads in California about the high speed rail project.
When you see the price tag on this thing, Why?
Because the government's paying for it.
And when the government takes people's money and gives it to other people, takes tax money and gives it to a, you know, whatever, a construction company for real, they don't care about the cost.
It's not their money.
And they don't care about the quality of the project because it's not theirs either.
They're not buying anything for themselves.
The famous Milton Friedman line.
Listen to the price tag on this thing, and there's still $90 billion with a B short.
Check this out.
As we speak right now, are the funds there to complete LA to San Francisco?
The entire amount of money we need.
Not there today.
But do we believe we can get those funds to get the project done?
Absolutely.
How much do you estimate it's going to cost to connect high-speed rail San Francisco to LA?
Today, we estimate with the right optimization, just over $125 billion.
I think $126 billion is the current estimate for that.
That's more funding than Amtrak has received in its history and still leaves a shortfall of roughly $90 billion.
That's a big gap to fill.
It is a big gap to fill, but again, we have an understanding of how to get there and to fill that gap.
Can you believe it?
100, a little bit.
We got a little gap, 120 billion, another 90, 90.
Folks, you could have rebuilt basically a quarter of the infrastructure in the entire state of California at those costs.
This is your utopia?
Can you guys in California, the Democrats who are running this state to the ground, can you guys do anything right?
Folks, you have a test case, a natural experiment in front of you right now.
Florida, California.
People are moving to Florida.
People are moving out of California.
Why?
Well, taxes are just one of the reasons.
Yeah, you're right.
Quality of life, cost of living.
Janie bag of donuts, not using a Tide Pod to do a wash in the fire hydrant on the corner.
I get.
Which one?
Oh, gosh, probably far less than that.
That's a good point.
Yeah, probably a fraction of what this freaking.
And no one's going to even ride the damn thing.
Here, this tweet went nuclear this weekend too.
Someone, Marie Davidson.
Just again to show you how insane government spending by Democrats, and to be honest, a lot of Republicans have contributed to this debacle too, okay?
Here is the extent of how badly government spending has gotten out of control.
In case you think like this is austerity or anything like that, put that tweet up.
This one, nuclear this weekend.
U.S. population grew 6% in the last decade.
Okay.
Federal spending grew 40%.
Well, that's not adjusted for inflation.
Yes, it is.
That's real money.
Not as bad as California, but you have to ask where did all the money go?
There it is.
There's the chart.
Where'd all the money go?
The same place all government spending goes because the government doesn't care about cost or quality.
It's the Milton Friedman problem, folks.
They're not spending their money, it's yours.
So they don't care about the cost.
But the problem with government is.
Is they're not even buying anything for themselves.
They're buying these third party items, high speed rail, all this.
So they don't care about the quality either.
If I steal your money and buy something for myself, I don't really care about the cost because I stole your money.
But if I'm getting a hotel room for it, I want a damn good hotel room.
At least I care about the quality.
The government's buying a hotel room for someone else.
They don't even give a damn about the quality.
I mean, is this a hard math problem to figure out?
Here was another little bit of tragic comedy this weekend.
The Democrats are now finally admitting, decades later, that Obamacare, that they told you was going to bring costs down.
I wish I had that made more.
I should have put it in the show.
Obama over and over.
We're going to cut costs, make health care more affordable.
Yeah, that was bullshit.
Showing you how everything the government touches on the economic front, they destroy.
We do the military and law enforcement pretty good.
Everything they touch, they destroy because they don't care.
They told you Obamacare was going to reduce costs, high quality health care.
Everyone was going to, hey, you got a car.
You was like the Oprah show.
Here's a piece in the Wall Street Journal quoting Democrat senators now admitting everything they told you about Obamacare was crap because when the government takes over health care and taxes people to give other people money for health care, they don't care about the cost of the health care and they don't care about the quality of the health care because it's not their health care either.
The Democrats' Obamacare quagmire.
They note in 2008, Obama pledged his health care plan with lower premiums by $2,500 a year for the typical family.
But Senator Peter Welch, who signed the Wyden letter, conceded last fall that we did fail to bring down the cost of health care.
The solutions the letter outlines would also fail to bring down costs.
The senators propose reinstating costly enhanced subsidies.
Wait, just stop right there.
So, the solution for Obamacare, what he told us, is we're going to tax the shit out of people, give the money to others to buy healthcare.
So, the solution when that failed to control costs, obviously the third party payer problem I just described with cost and quality, their solution is to tax people more to give people more subsidies or other people's money.
Oh, by the way, they also proposed exploring the benefits of giving all Americans access to Medicare type choices for healthcare.
That's a great idea.
That's working just great.
Medicare, which is going bankrupt by their own nonpartisan actuarial standards.
That's a great idea.
Let's jam everyone into Medicare now.
Folks, I told you, we have this conflict of visions, man.
It's sitting there right in front of you.
We have these natural experiments.
You can look at yourself.
I know the liberals out there who only care about power and don't care about principles, you're beyond persuasion.
But to the rank and file working Democrats out there who are interested in an alternative to the crazy, I'm just asking you, don't believe me, believe the data.
Do you want more California in Florida?
Do you want more California in Alabama?
Do you want more Obamacare subsidies?
They said, why would we need more subsidies?
I thought it was supposed to control costs.
Subsidies are a cute name for tax dollars, subsidizing other people with your tax dollars.
Here was Lee Zeldin.
I bring up Lee Zeldin for a couple of reasons.
Again, I want to show you how this conflict of visions, how the media feeds into this, how the media gaslights by isolating you from the truth.
I was upstairs with my daughter last night.
We were watching a movie, and that movie, The Girl on the Train, popped up.
So she's younger, so I had to turn up.
But it made me think you ever see Girl on the Train?
It's a movie about gaslighting and how this husband's a crazy guy, and he isolates his wife from the truth, so he gets his wife to believe she's the crazy person.
And the way the whole thing breaks, in case you haven't seen the movie, is the wife runs into some lady on a plane who used to work with the husband who goes, Hey, that never happened.
And all of a sudden, it all makes sense.
I am really hoping this show is that moment for you where I can present to you these two visions using data and say, Do you want more of this?
Because if you do, vote for Gavin Newsom.
You want Tide Pod lady in the fire hydrant?
He's your guy.
In the midterms, Democrats are your guy.
Or you can complain about foul language in a tweet.
Here's Lee Zeldin on CNN.
Lee Zeldin's EPA administrator.
I bring him up also because there's some discussion of him being the next attorney general.
I covered that show on Friday.
I think right now we're probably down to, I wrote down four names.
I'm just telling you what I've been reading and hearing from a couple folks.
Donald Trump, President Trump's going to pick who he wants.
He doesn't need Dan Bongino for this.
I'm just saying, I think you could probably narrow it down right now to Todd Blanch, who's acting.
He may stay, Lee Zeldin, who you're going to see in a second.
Janine Pirro, Judge Janine, who's the United States Attorney in D.C.
And I've seen Alina Habba's name creep up.
I love Alina.
I think she's fantastic.
Just a great person.
Just telling you what I've read in the media.
But here's Lee Zeldin as the EPA Administrator.
He's on CNN.
And I want you to notice the gaslighting technique here.
She's trying to tell him, hey, listen, this endangerment finding about basically pollution, about pollution, like, I can't believe you guys are challenging this.
Like, what do you want pollution?
And then he notes a really simple, elegant point back.
Hey, the graphic you keep showing about pollution from smokestacks had nothing to do with Donald Trump's executive orders and the administration's policies on the endangerment filing.
It's from moving vehicles, not smokestacks.
Like, you may want to tell people that.
Check this out.
I do want to start with the fundamental question that's at the heart of all this.
I mean, do you accept the overwhelming scientific consensus that these greenhouse gas emissions are the biggest drivers of man made climate change?
Pollution Comes From Vehicles00:09:50
Well, it's great to be on with you.
Uh, first, it's, uh, worth pointing out that, uh, all eight or so images that you just posted on the screen have nothing to do with this week's announcement.
Uh, what was the 2009 endangerment finding had to do with was with regards to mobile sources vehicles.
This week's proposal to rescind the 2009 endangerment finding was with regards to mobile sources vehicles.
CNN's been using a lot of photos where they show smokestacks of stationary sources like power plants.
That's not what we proposed.
This is how, when you see how these liberals are stuck in the girl on the train moment where she thinks she's the bad guy and it's really the husband, this is how they do it.
They isolate you from the truth so you can never have your eyes opened.
Ever.
Vanilla Scott, open your eyes.
What about BG Gruff?
What about Justin for AG?
Mr. President, Justin's interested.
He's too busy running his hoodie company.
You should start that.
It's a good idea.
You see how the gaslighting and the isolating people from the truth?
Let's put up a picture of smokestacks.
And people are like, oh my gosh, Lee Zeldin at the EPA loves pollution from smokestacks.
And then you find out the endangerment finding challenge, 8:4 has nothing to do with smokestacks at all.
I'm telling you it on this show because we cut through the BS.
I got another clip coming up as Zeldin, who I think would be an excellent choice for AG.
I think all of them would be good.
It's not my choice, it's president's, but him going at it with Adam Schiff, an absolute clown.
This is just for your comic relief.
I got some more stuff coming up.
Quick break here.
I'm going to get to that.
Folks, simply safe.
Listen, you're looking at a home security system, please consider simply safe.
Let's be honest.
Traditional home security companies can make protecting your home way harder than it needs to be.
You don't need it to be really hard.
You need it to be really easy.
Long contracts, expensive monthly fees, and waiting around half a day for a technician.
That's why I recommend Simply Safe.
Producer Jim recently received his Simply Safe setup, he has it installed in his home.
He loves it.
They gave him great customer service, and he talks about how easy it was to install.
Don't lie awake at night listening to every bump and noise or stressing out while you're away from home, wondering if you've locked everything up.
You need total peace of mind.
Arm the system at night, see that system armed light.
And sleep peacefully.
And when you're away, you can check the cameras in seconds and know everything's fine.
It's all backed by 24 7 professional monitoring, ready to dispatch help if something happens.
Best part no contracts, no hidden fees.
Simply Safe earns your business every month by working for you, not by locking you in.
I want you to experience the same peace of mind I do, which is why I partner with Simply Safe to offer an exclusive discount to my listeners.
Right now, you can get 50% off your new system by visiting simplysafe.comslash Dan Bongino.
That's simply with an I, S I M P L I, simplysafe.com slash Dan Bongino.
That's simplysafe.com slash Dan Bongino for 50% off.
There's no safe like Simply Safe.
Thanks, Simply Safe.
Here's Lee Zeldin.
Again, I really like Lee.
Again, disclosure I've known Lee for a long time.
I did an event with him once.
He's a great guy, ran for governor of New York, almost pulled off a huge upset.
Probably in the final four for pun intended games, the national championship game on that.
What is it, Michigan and UConn tonight, right?
Michigan, UConn for the championship.
So we'll see what happens there.
But however, he's probably one of the final people in the running.
Here he is going at it with Adam Schiff.
You know, just a pencil neck clown.
I can't stand this guy Schiff.
Check this out.
What is it about this grant that you and EPA believe is problematic enough to freeze this funding and put potentially 31,000 children at risk?
Senator, who is the grant applicant?
This is to the city of Santa Ana.
The biggest and are you the biggest state?
So, are you going to go through every single uh list of the grant?
Well, by the way, with that wind up, by the way, I understand that you are an aspiring fiction writer, I see why.
Oh, yeah, well, I had to cut it there because did you guys get you see the shift response?
You can see how he's totally caught off guard.
Oh, yeah, I tried to be a smartass.
Meanwhile, he knows he just got completely wrecked.
I like Zelda a lot, I think all of these folks would bring a lot to the table, however.
I'm going to tell you, I don't think President Trump is in any particular rush right now.
He's got the DAG, Todd Blanch, acting in that role now.
So there's not a continuity problem.
These investigations are ongoing.
I'm reasonably confident over the course of weeks and months, you're going to see more of these things that people say aren't happening happening.
So I don't think he's in any particular rush.
It is, you know, I will say, just having direct experience, it's probably the most difficult job in D.C. Because you got to understand, like, when you're a cabinet head, Or a cabinet head equivalent.
You know, you can kind of just top down push things through.
That's not the way it works in the Justice Department.
The justice system is designed to work slowly, it's designed to work slowly.
So it is a difficult job, but those people are really competent.
We'll see where that goes.
Folks, whoever the president winds up picking for the spot, one of the most challenging problems we're going to have moving forward is this anchor baby issue and birthright citizenship.
I've been discussing it in the course of the past week because the Supreme Court is looking at this now.
It hinges on those words, subject to the jurisdiction thereof.
We are going to have a really, really big national security problem.
I can't emphasize this enough.
In the United States, if the Supreme Court rules that you being born here, even to people who are here illegally, creates a constitutional right to citizenship, we're in a world of trouble.
I played that clip by Theo Wald on Jesse Kelly's show last week where he suggests we may need a constitutional amendment.
Backing that up.
The question is, would we be able to even get that through?
I'm not so sure.
I hope so.
This would be a huge problem.
Think about what could happen here.
You have these foreign enemies of the United States.
I'm going to show you this tweet in a second, so stay tuned.
This is important.
In case you think like I'm just making this up and being overly dramatic, we can all agree the Chinese Communist Party is a known near existential threat to the United States if they had unlimited power.
They hate us, just like the Iranian mullah class.
They do.
What a gift it would be to them to say, hey, get a couple of your citizens, legally, illegally, doesn't matter, find your way onto some U.S. territory or soil somewhere, have a baby, and basically you have the right to citizenship, the right to vote, the right to join the military, all of this stuff.
You get the full portfolio of American rights, whether you did it the right way or not.
The national security problems there are endless.
The Supreme Court doesn't need lectures from me.
I'm just telling you, please think this through.
The threat here is real.
Put up that tweet if you have the counterintelligence case.
So, this is Jenny Tare on X. Huge.
The Chinese Americans accused of attempting to explode an IED at McDill in Tampa were anchor babies for illegal parents, as reported by Mary Margaret Olihan.
DHS nabbed the duo's parents on March 18th for illegal entry.
Parents applied for asylum in 93 but were denied by an immigration judge who issued them a deportation order in 98.
The Board of Immigration Appeals repeatedly denied their attempts to have their case reopen.
Despite their repeated denials for status, they remained in the United States.
Folks, you don't think there are other foreign countries watching this and paying close attention?
The Constitution is not a suicide pact, as has been said many times.
This is a huge national security issue.
There's the article by Mary Margaret you can check out at Daily Wire.
Folks, the last year, man, was a big eye opener, I got to tell you.
Ignorance is never bliss.
But when I talk about things on the show with appropriate context and with Limitations and guardrails for obvious reasons.
A lot of it's based on the experience over the last year.
When I say things like, hey, the U.S. government is going to need good, solid private sector partnerships in space because space is that new frontier for warfare, I'm not kidding.
We have to have some role in it.
When I tell you that this anchor baby issue is going to open up a bunch of enemies of the United States, a way to just basically come in here and gain access to our institutions through a U.S. passport, I'm not kidding.
They've already thought this through.
The Constitution was not a suicide pact.
You've got this conflict of visions.
You've got these natural studies.
You saw the Biden open border years versus the Trump closed border years.
You see the economic growth now versus the 9% inflation under Biden.
You've seen the California, you know, five, six, eight, $10 a gallon gas, the Tide Pod lady in the washing her clothes in a fire hydrant.
You've seen that.
You've seen the U haul costs from California to Florida versus Florida to California, which I don't think happens at all.
Trump Closed Border Years00:02:14
You have natural studies right now on Obamacare.
We passed Obamacare.
You can study what happened in the natural world.
What happened?
Costs went up so bad, they need more of your tax money to pay for the exploding cost.
You've seen it.
Now it's time you had the girl on the train moment where you meet that person who finally tells you the truth.
I hope this show is that person for you.
Folks, thanks again for tuning in.
I really appreciate it.
Please download the Rumble app if you don't mind, it is absolutely free.
Go there, follow our show.
It is free, The Dan Bongino Show.
You get a notification every day at 10 a.m.
If you want to do it on the web too, you can go to rumble.comslash Bongino.
Justin put together this handy dandy graphic.
You can always check out Haley at noon as well.
Rumble.comslash Haley and a Vince colon ace.
Is that a new picture of Vince?
They are, right?
Look at Vince with the tie on.
He looks like presidential timber right there.
Did you see that?
Vince is on 8 a.m.
And is that a new picture of Haley?
He's got a little smirk going there.
See, that's a new picture.
Good job, guys.
Good job by our photo department.
They're like, we don't have a photo department.
I'm like, well, I guess we do now.
Thanks again for tuning in, folks.
I will see you back.
Speaking of the photo department, you're supposed to be Han Solo.
No, no, because Luke goes, that's right.
Good point, guys.
Good job on the page.
That was quick how you did that during the show.
Well done.
I'll see you guys back here tomorrow at 10 a.m.
I'm Haley Carradia, host of Vince, host of Scrolling with Haley.
You can always catch my show right here, right here on the Von Gina Report, live at 8 a.m. Eastern weekday mornings.
Weekdays at noon.
If you miss it, no worries.
The show will always be right here and anywhere you find the podcast.
Thanks for watching.
Hey everyone, Haley Karania here, host of Scrolling with Haley.
My show is coming up right here on Rumble at 12 p.m. Eastern Time.
I cover breaking news, react to viral videos, go down conspiracy theory rabbit holes, and have a whole lot of fun.
You are not going to want to miss a second of it live at 12 p.m. Eastern Time right here on Rumble.