In this episode, I address the shocking new allegation that the Biden White House knew in advance about the raid on Trump. I also address an explosive new report about the UFO phenomenon.
News Picks:
More leaks about the disastrous Mar a Lago raid.
Biden White House facilitated DOJ's criminal probe against Trump, scuttled privilege claims: memos.
The latest congressional action on UFOs will open your eyes.
Working from home is becoming the norm.
Fetterman is a fraud.
Reports indicate that Biden was personally involved in the attack on Mike Flynn.
A blood test for cancer? I hope this is true.
The NY Times reports on social media company’s efforts to interfere in the coming elections.
Rumble challenges Big Tech's ad dominance, launches Rumble Ads in beta.
Copyright Bongino Inc All Rights Reserved
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Get ready to hear the truth about America on a show that's not immune to the facts with your host, Dan Bongino.
So my best source ever, my buddy 279er sent me something this morning and I think he nailed it.
I think he nailed it about the Mar-a-Lago rate.
I really do.
But it can be seen two ways.
One, oh wow, this is genius, and another, man, they really screwed up.
I'll explain what I mean, big show today.
One quick note, Florida, New York, Oklahoma as well, where my sister and brother-in-law live, vote today, Tuesday, August 23rd.
You gotta go out and vote.
School board elections, local elections, that's where the action happens.
Florida, New York, Oklahoma, today.
Please don't forget.
Thank you very much.
All right, let's get to it.
If you're in the market for a rifle, shotgun, or revolver, you want to go with the best in the business.
And as far as I'm concerned, that's Henry Repeating Arms.
You'll be amazed by their quality craftsmanship and buttery smooth action that makes them a pleasure to shoot.
Mine were accurate right out of the box and they've been reliable ever since.
The best way to learn about Henry Repeating Arms 200 models is to go to HenryUSA.com and order their free catalog.
The catalog is a great guide to showcasing their Made in America firearms, plus you'll get free decals, a list of dealers in your area, and a great newsletter.
Henry's are backed with a lifetime warranty for 100% satisfaction.
They're made in America or they won't be made at all.
And if you have questions, you can call the award-winning customer service department to speak with an expert who can help you.
Make sure you go to henryusa.com to order their free catalog and decals.
The best way to learn about Henry Repeating Arms 200 models is to go to henryusa.com and order their free catalog.
That's henryusa.com to order a free catalog and decals and to learn more about this great American company.
All right, Joseph, let's go.
Take me to your leader.
Yeah.
Yes.
Well, let me tell you something.
Joe Biden may be the president, but he's not my leader because what's going on right now, there are the disgusting we're coming out firing yesterday.
Yeah, today.
I'll get to that in a second.
Hold on.
I got a dollar.
No, I don't.
The disgusting third world corrupt BS tactics going on to the asymmetrical leak game where the intelligence community and the Biden administration are leaking information out to destroy and damage Trump after this Mar-a-Lago raid and then fighting his ability to fight back so that you can see the affidavit is some serious third world BS.
Here's what I meant by that last segment.
Yesterday on the radio show, the podcast, I was a little hot.
Um, I always love your feedback for about 10% of the audience.
I guess, you know, it was a little too much.
I can be a little too fiery and emotional sometimes.
I totally understand the shows for you, but I can't fake it.
I'm sorry to 10% my sincere apologies.
I mean it.
I want the show to be, uh, educational, informative and pleasant for you.
Uh, but I, I just, I have to be me and I, I don't, I'm not going to fake it.
And I was really, really fired up.
Like some people were tweeting, gosh, this is like a new level of angry Dan yesterday.
And it was a new level of Angry Dan because folks, we are now living in the third world.
We're living in the actual third world.
I mean, things third world countries do are being replicated here.
Here's what I mean.
Look at this report out of the Washington Examiner.
I just don't want to link to the New York Times, I'm sorry.
It's covering a New York Times report, but whatever.
Washington Examiner, 300 plus classified documents found at Trump's Mar-a-Lago report.
That was at the New York Times report.
They note, the initial trove of documents in the National Archives and Records Administration collected in January included over 150 documents with classified markings.
And seizures in June and August brought the total up to more than 300, sources told the New York Times.
Sources?
So Donald Trump's team is begging for transparency.
Please release the hounds, release the affidavit so we can see what you're accusing me of.
The Department of Justice and the Biden administration is fighting that while simultaneously like total sleazeballs, they are leaking to the media in what Jonathan Turley, a lawyer who comments on Fox News a lot.
He's not a conservative, by the way, from what I know.
He hasn't told me his politics, I'm guessing.
What he calls litigation by leak.
This is information warfare.
We are now living in the third world.
The FBI and the DOJ have chosen to litigate this thing publicly using asymmetry and asymmetric access to records.
They refuse Trump's team access to the records while they hold the records and leak damaging information to the media.
Fire every single sleazeball involved in this thing.
Everyone.
Everyone.
I told you I'd be a little...
I can't.
I can't.
I'm sorry.
I can't fake it.
I just can't as a federal agent and as a guy who put his own ass on the line, you know, and nearly lost my family and everything.
To protect Obama, Clinton, and Democrats, because I believed in the Constitutional Republic when I lost.
It's hard for me to digest how FBI agents and DOJ officials who were swearing to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States are acting like third world dictator, you know, jackbooted thugs here.
I can't play this clip enough about the intel community.
Everyone has to be fired.
Everyone.
Everyone involved in this.
No excuses.
Chuck Schumer warned us about this on the Rachel Maddow show.
When you mess with the intel community, he's talking about the FBI, CIA, and otherwise, they'll get back at you.
So apparently this has been a problem for decades and everybody just lets it happen.
The intel community apparently just runs the government by themselves.
Check this out.
You take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.
Now, back to this Washington Examiner piece for a minute with the screenshot.
I want you to notice something.
Because the FBI and DOJ can't keep their mouth shut, we have the most corrupt Attorney General in United States history, Garrick Marlin.
A total life loser at this point.
A life loser.
Remember Jessica Tarloff of The Five?
He called him a loser.
That's because he does loser stuff.
You don't want to be called a loser, don't do loser stuff.
They're leaking, Jessica.
Did you miss this?
They're leaking to the New York Times.
To damage Trump when giving him no ability to defend himself.
And what they're suggesting, if the left was smart, they're morons, they're not.
If the left were smart, the left would be saying to themselves, well they leaked that Trump had documents that had classified markings.
Notice they didn't say they were classified documents.
Oh, do you mean there could be a difference?
Yeah.
Number one, presidents have the power to declassify documents.
They don't need to file some formal thing.
They can, we could discuss this yesterday, but second, because a document is marked classified doesn't mean it is any longer.
Do I need to give this example again of the motorcade?
When I was in the transportation section, Protecting presidents of both parties, unlike the left who can't put their partisanship out of the way because they're tyrants.
If you had a motorcade route, that motorcade route was classified many times.
Why was it classified or for official use only?
Because you didn't want terrorists to know where you were going to be driving so they couldn't set up and kill you.
Probably smart.
After the trip happened, and the president drove the motorcade route, and thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of people saw and heard about it in the reports, it's no longer classified.
Why?
Because the information was classified a day before, everybody now knows.
So then people in the public, who were to spread around the motorcade route they just saw, would then be guilty of trafficking in classified information that they easily had access to.
So just because something's marked classified, doesn't mean it's actually classified.
Interesting how the DOJ and the FBI leaked that, Mark classified, and Maggie Haberman and others at the New York Times, they just pick it up and run with it because it sounds really, really bad.
Notice they don't tell you what the documents actually are.
Maybe put them out there.
Maybe we'd like to see.
Maybe some of them are classified or marked classified.
Texts between Peter Stroke and his FBI girlfriend Lisa Page.
You know, two of the people involved in the spying operation on Donald Trump.
Maybe we should take a look at that.
What do you guys think?
That'd probably be a good idea.
I like that idea.
Yeah.
Yeah, I like that idea too.
Now we know, in more breaking news yesterday from John Solomon, it's just the news, that the Biden administration, Biden who has a history of grotesque corruption, you know he is the big guy, cutting himself in as the big guy according to his multiple reports on a deal with the Chinese Communist Party connected company.
Joe Biden, the most corrupt human being to ever enter the White House, including Barack Obama by the way, makes Barack Obama look like Mother Teresa.
Now we know the Biden administration was directly involved in this operation to target Donald Trump for marked classified paperwork at an unprecedented rate.
How do we know that?
Solomon got his hands on some emails.
And apparently they note that the Biden administration, which claims, by the way, Joe, they knew nothing about nothing about nothing.
Sergeant Schultz style.
I don't know nothing.
I know nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
That's Joe Biden.
Fact checkers.
That's not really Joe Biden.
There we go.
The gist of it's the same.
They claim to know nothing.
That's really weird.
Because a letter revealed that Joe Biden empowered the National Archives to waive any claims to executive privilege Trump might assert to block the DOJ from gaining access to the documents.
They have the letter right there.
Notes, I have therefore decided not to honor the former president talking about Trump's protective claim of privilege.
Now, you may be saying, well, that sounds strange.
The current president can waive the former president's executive privilege?
Now, why does that sound strange?
Because it is.
And if it goes to the Supreme Court, that'll probably be overturned like everything else, because it's ridiculous.
But now we know the unprecedented weaponization of government badges and guns in the FBI.
Badges and guns can take your life and take your freedom.
And the use of the FBI as a political weaponization, a activist enforcement team, a bunch of bouncers for the government.
We know this unprecedented action happened, and we know the Biden administration knew about it.
Now, none of this should be surprising to any of you about Joe Biden, you know, the big guy.
He is a corrupt, grotesque individual.
Who is a liar, he is a plagiarist.
He is disgusting around other people, by the way.
I'll leave that for another day.
A really very disgusting human being.
His family are just horrendous, awful people.
The people who are involved in these foreign dealings and leveraging our government.
What they're doing is disgusting.
I use my words very deliberately.
We also know Joe Biden has a history of abusing his power to target his political opponents like he did with Donald Trump.
Remember this story?
New York Post?
Joe Biden may have personally raised the idea to investigate Mike Flynn.
Peter Stroke, the same guy, the FBI guy, you know, was involved in the Spygate operation, had a handwritten note.
Remember this?
We covered this last week.
The handwritten note indicated VP Logan Act after a meeting, apparently, at the White House.
Apparently, the vice president may have been the one who brought up the Logan Act to prosecute Mike Flynn.
Also something unprecedented that had never been done in U.S.
history, in addition to raiding a former president.
So Joe Biden may be behind the decision to use the Logan Act, something never successfully prosecuted in the history of the United States to go after Trump's national security advisor.
And Biden's team was directly involved in the decision by the National Archives, a decision, a key in the decision-making chain that resulted in a search warrant served at a former president's house.
The man's disgusting.
I'll get to my man 279 in a second, too, because 279 made a great, great point about what they're really up to here.
Could be taken two ways, though.
Now the worst part about this whole thing is they keep insisting through leaks, through as John Turley calls it, litigation by leak, as they try to damage the Trump administration.
They keep insisting that the documents are marked classified, implying with a wink and a nod, Joseph, that the documents are classified, despite no evidence that's the case.
Donald Trump, in his sole discretion, has the management authority to declare things as personal papers.
That is the ruling of a federal court, Amy Berman Jackson in 2012.
Period.
They always leave all this stuff out.
The media.
Making matters even worse, that I don't believe these papers were classified, and I have actual evidence to back it up, and legal precedent.
Maybe Mark classified.
There's another piece that came out Rifkin and Casey put up in the journal yesterday.
The Trump warrant had no legal basis.
They make this point, they drill this thing into stone this point.
There's a difference between marked classified and classified.
They note in making a former president's records available to him, the president, the Presidential Records Act doesn't distinguish between materials that are and aren't classified.
This was a deliberate choice by Congress, as the existence of highly classified materials at the White House was a given long before 1978, and the statute specifically contemplates that classified materials will be present, making this a basis on which a president can impose a 12-year moratorium on public access to said paperwork.
In other words, There is no avenue to get off this highway for the tyrants who raided President Trump's house and Melania's underwear drawer.
There is no avenue.
Number one, because they were marked classified doesn't mean they were classified.
Number two, the president, Donald Trump, former president, has already said he declassified the material and he's done so publicly on the Russiagate stuff.
Number three, the Presidential Records Act doesn't even make a distinction.
And if this thing is litigated, the fact that the president had information that even may be classified still isn't a ground ball for them.
There is no off-ramp.
None.
Now, the greatest source ever, the 279er.
He sent me this.
He's like, Dan, I think I know what they're up to here.
He said, they're obviously trying to damage Trump so he doesn't run again.
So let's look at this two ways.
He says, first, his theory on this is they're going to use Trump's attacks on Hillary Clinton for having the server with classified information on it against him to say, look, he can't run again either.
This is lawfare.
Okay.
Lawfare.
This is from October of 2016.
Just so you know, Lawfare, these are buddies of Jim Comey.
The Lawfare crew and Comey are tight, okay?
They're not conservatives, they're lefties.
They're trying to defend Hillary Clinton here.
This is after the Comey speech, where Comey says, you know, no reasonable prosecutor.
What was it?
The July 5th speech, Joe, when no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute Hillary Clinton.
You all remember that, right?
Oh yeah.
So after that, the Lawfare group, the Lawfare group, which is friends, had to jump and defend Hillary Clinton and Comey.
So they know, and they defend Comey's decision as follows, that some argue that prosecution was warranted because not all of the relevant laws require intent.
An important, potentially applicable one, 18 U.S.C.
793, remember that, 793, 793, requires only gross negligence.
Okay, just track me from it.
You can read on, but I don't want to belabor the point here.
Comey's friends at Lawfare saying Jim Comey's decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton, which Loretta Lynch at the time, the Attorney General, said she would respect, which is a total reversal of how the process is supposed to work, by the way.
The FBI doesn't make prosecution decisions, they do investigations.
Forget that, that's for another day.
Loretta Lynch knew what Comey was going to do, I have little doubt.
One of the things they're talking about here is that gross negligence is a standard for prosecution, meaning if Hillary Clinton had, in a grossly negligent manner, trafficked unclassified information, she could be prosecuted.
And then they go on to defend her there, say there are many hurdles to this, even assuming gross negligence standard is the right one here.
So you get what Lawfare's saying?
Okay, she may have been negligent, but there are a lot of hurdles here, and we're not sure this is even the right standard.
Look at this.
Brilliant by my man 279er.
Here's the Trump affidavit parts we've seen at least.
And note the charge they're trying to charge him with.
18 U.S.C.
793.
Gross negligence.
So his theory, which I agree and disagree with a little bit, 279 or you can respond back to me, is that, well, you wanted Hillary prosecuted for gross negligence, but we're going to show you were grossly negligent too by keeping classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.
Now, I think he may be right.
There's a problem with that, Joe.
Hillary Clinton's information on a classified, uh, classified information on a private server meets gross negligence.
Donald Trump keeping papers locked up at Mar-a-Lago with secret service protection full time at the facility.
Is it even close?
Second though, and here's the way I disagree slightly with the 279er.
This is going to be a tough road to hoe for them.
You may say, well, they're charging him with it.
So he's right.
Maybe, maybe, maybe so.
But if Jim Comey, the FBI, Loretta Lynch, and the AG said, no, this doesn't meet a gross negligence standard because no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute it, then how the hell are you going to charge Donald Trump with the same thing?
When the facts are even better for Donald Trump.
Far better.
I guess we'll see.
But a brilliant theory by the great 279er.
793 makes its appearance again.
Gross negligence.
Alright, let me get to this.
The New York Times added again, trying to interfere, excuse me, social media companies, as reported by the New York Times, added again, trying to interfere in yet another election.
This is just getting really weird.
I'm telling you, we're living in the third world.
That's a fact.
If you're looking for a firearm, I wholeheartedly recommend Henry Repeating Arms.
They make 200 models of rifles, shotguns, and revolvers in a wide variety of calibers and finishes.
Plus, they have new releases throughout the year.
And trust me, folks, you just can't beat their quality.
The best way to learn about Henry Firearms is to order their free catalog to check out their line at home.
Plus, you'll get two free decals, a list of dealers in your area, and a great newsletter.
Just go to HenryUSA.com and click on the free catalog button in the top right corner.
Henry Repeating Arms uses old-world craftsmanship combined with cutting-edge technology to deliver reliability and accuracy you can trust.
They're easy to use and maintain, making them an excellent choice for personal and property defense, hunting and the shooting sports, and beginners.
And they're made in America, or they won't be made at all.
Remember to order their free catalog and decals at HenryUSA.com.
Just go to HenryUSA.com and click on the free catalog button in the top right corner.
That's HenryUSA.com and click on the free catalog button in the top right corner.
You're going to love this company.
Folks, they're at it again.
The social media companies, how the Federal Elections Commission, the FEC, is not involved here in a thorough sanctioning of the social media companies that have interfered in countless elections is additional evidence that the swamp is real and the system is rigged exclusively to benefit Democrats in elections.
It's rigged.
The social media ecosystem is entirely rigged to benefit Democrats.
Liberals are almost never sanctioned, almost never on social media, while anyone associated with the MAGA movement, conservatism, or even moderate Democrats who object to liberal tyranny are sanctioned immediately and wiped off the face of the social media earth.
New York Times reporting about it again, what Facebook is doing before the election.
Now, here we go again, it's not just Facebook, it's YouTube, TikTok, Twitter, Other ones as well.
How the FEC is not declaring this an in-kind donation to the left is, again, just evidence that the swamp wants this system rigged and rigged permanently.
You know what an in-kind donation is?
It's important you understand that.
If Guy wants to donate to my campaign, if I'm running for president, and says, listen, I don't have a lot of money, but what I'm going to do is I'm going to give you free production services for the entirety of your campaign.
I'm not allowed to accept that without reporting the fair market value of it.
It's what's called an in-kind donation.
How Facebook and others sanctioning repeatedly conservatives and rarely if ever sanctioning liberal candidates is not an in-kind donation to the party and the candidates in general who are running against these people is a travesty and a grotesque violation of the bond between us and government.
Here, New York Times.
To fight election falsehoods.
Notice how they frame this, by the way.
Social media companies ready a familiar playbook.
They note that Facebook's approach this year will be largely consistent with the policies and safeguards, says this guy here.
They're gonna post rated false or partly false.
Keep that in mind for the future.
I've got a story coming up about Snopes.
Post rated false or partly false by one of Facebook's 10 American fact-checking partners.
Ha!
Fact-checking.
By the way, Facebook already admitted in court that they're not fact-checkers, they're opinion checkers.
I should have put that in the show.
How did I miss that?
That if you get one of those warning labels, It'll say false information before they can see the content.
But in a change from 2020, those labels will be used in a more targeted and strategic way for posts discussing the integrity of the midterm elections.
So again, just to be clear.
Facebook is going to strategically target you using a bunch of hilariously misguided so-called fact-checkers who Facebook already admitted in a legal proceeding were doing no such thing.
They're just opinion writers.
They already admitted this.
And they're going, if you question the integrity of the elections?
Okay.
Um, are any of these people then?
Again, showing you how the FEC needs to get involved here and start sanctioning Facebook and elsewhere.
I demand these people who are questioning the integrity of elections, they should be sanctioned by Facebook too.
Wait till you see who the people are.
Check this out.
You can run the best campaign.
You can even become the nominee and you can have the election stolen from you.
How can you win with Russian interference though?
That's what I'm scared about in 2020.
But rightly.
Because I think he's an illegitimate president that didn't really win.
So how do you, you know, fight against that in 2020?
You are absolutely right.
He is an illegitimate president in my mind.
Would you be my vice president?
I'm so candid.
Folks, look, I absolutely agree.
Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016.
He lost the election, and he was put in office because of the Russians' interference.
Trump knows he's an illegitimate president.
The president, although legally elected, is not legitimate.
I mean, these people, by their own definition on the left, are clearly election deniers.
Hillary Clinton and that treasure trove of Democrats, Jimmy Carter and others, shouldn't they be preemptively banned?
I mean, you just said you can't question the integrity of elections.
You just said that.
You see how this is asymmetric?
Like the FBI and DOJ's war on America asymmetrically leaking, yet preventing Trump access to the information?
You see how Facebook and social media companies surgically attach their lips to the ass of the Democrat Party?
How is this allowed?
How is this allowed by our FEC?
This is so clearly an in-kind donation to one political party over another that you pretending it's not is so hilariously ridiculous, especially considering the fact that Fakebook themselves in court, they were literally not figuratively forced to acknowledge that fact-checkers do no such thing and are really just opinion writers.
Those are the election deniers.
Right there!
Folks, there's a war going on, an information war out there.
And I'm telling you, it has never been more important that we get away from these people, their infrastructure, and their economy, and build out the parallel economy.
I saw a story this morning about another influencer, whatever you call him, getting canceled by Stripe, YouTube.
I saw it this morning.
Again, with humility and respect, asking you to please check us out.
I hate to do it.
But I've got to give you alternatives.
If you want them, take them.
If you don't, you don't.
If you're on Stripe, get rid of them immediately.
It is only a matter of time before they cancel you.
I promise.
If you are a conservative, you will be on their radar.
Them or one of those payment processors.
Check us out at paralleleconomy.com.
We don't cancel people.
We are a free speech platform.
We're working with a number of people right now who've been canceled.
The good news is, despite Fakebook, TikTok, and others, the parallel economy's exploding.
It's not just that, it's Rumble.
Rumble, you know I'm an investor, and here's a Reclaim the Net article.
Rumble challenges big tech's ad dominance, launches Rumble ads in beta.
Google Ads thought they were funny, canceling a bunch of conservative websites from running web ads on the site.
Okay, Rumble ads, we'll take over, thanks.
Have a nice day.
I canceled Google Ads myself.
I dumped them off Bongino Report.
I don't want your business.
Thanks.
We got Rumble Ads coming now.
You can read the article yourself.
Be in the newsletter.
But check us out at paralleleconomy.com and we'll be updating you on rumble ads in the future.
I had Vivek Ramaswamy on my radio show yesterday talking about all this stuff.
He's got a, uh, I just, uh, I invested yesterday.
He's got a conservative alternative to black rock and other stuff that believes in, you know, free speech and business.
Had him on my radio show, talking about it yesterday.
All right, I've got the craziest video of a candidate coming up next, and then a UFO report from the hill that really, really opened my eyes, folks.
Joe's really into this, I am too.
Some of the language coming from the hill is a little disturbing, and I think Joe and I, I don't want to speak for you, Joe, but I think we both agree they're preparing to tell us something.
Yeah, I'm with you.
Before I get to the UFO thing, I just, because the elections, you know, we got Florida voting today, New York, Oklahoma.
Folks, the Senate, things aren't looking great in the Senate.
They're looking okay in the House, but we've got a bunch of frauds, fakes, and phonies on the Democrat side running.
Raphael Warnock, total fraud, leftist communist.
We've got Tim Ryan in Ohio, pretends to be some kind of a centrist moderate.
He's a nutbag, just voted for the IRS Act, not the Inflation Reduction Act.
I call it the IRS Act now, because that's what it is.
Ryan voted for that.
He's running for Senate.
And then we have this guy, the biggest clown I have ever seen run for office.
A goofball and a joker.
A daddy's little boy who's been paid his entire life by his dad to do nothing.
A pathetic human being who has never added a single ounce of value.
You have John Fetterman, the Democrat nominee for Senate in Pennsylvania.
Who is one of the fakest human beings?
Look at me.
I've got a Carhartt sweater on.
Yeah, who bought it for you?
Oh, dad bought it for me.
Oh, you've never had a job.
Okay.
So where are you?
You know what?
I'm going to get a Carhartt.
I'm going to wear it on my show.
Look at me.
Look at me, folks.
I'm an oil rig worker.
I have a Carhartt on.
No, I'm not.
I'm a talk show host, as I say all the time.
And I've said over and over, have I not, fellas?
This is not a real job.
This isn't a real job.
I talk for a living.
I had a real job once.
This is not a real job.
Dan, you're taking a shot at yourself.
It's true.
I talk.
You work for a living.
Oil fields, pilots, engineers, HVAC operators, electricians, plumbers, you work for a living.
And thank the Lord Almighty, and I'm not using his name, that you do, or the country wouldn't run.
Truckers.
My hat gets tipped to all of you.
Fetterman's never had a job!
Look at me, if I grow a little patch on my, uh, lower lip there, and put a cohort on, you'll think I was a trucker once too.
The dude has never had a job!
His daddy paid for him!
The guy is the biggest chump I've ever seen.
Ever run for office.
Not only is he a chump, he wants to release a third of the criminals in Pennsylvania jails.
Why am I talking about a Pennsylvania case?
Because it's a national seat.
If we lose this seat, we could lose the Senate.
And we're stuck with this idiot for six years.
Here he is on video, telling you Pennsylvanians, Pittsburgh, Philly, all you Pennsylvania folks out there, he wants to release a third of the criminals back into the streets.
Yeah, keep voting for him though.
Don't worry.
He's a dirt under the fingernails guy.
I don't know where that dirt came from, but it didn't come from Mark.
Check this out.
Why wouldn't we want to do that?
I was on a panel with our Director of Corrections, and he said something that I agree with, and is that we could release one-third of our inmate population and not make anyone less safe.
Erroneous!
Totally erroneous.
Thank you, Vince.
Guy, a man of few words during the break.
He looks at me and goes, holy moly, what a lunatic.
Yes!
He's not only a lunatic, he's a fake!
The most damaging political narratives in the world, I've said this often, right?
Are ones that change your pre-existing notion of who a person is.
That's why the media is hiding the fact from you, the liberal media, not the conservative media, that this guy's Carhartt, Patch under the lip.
I got tattoos because I'm a tough guy routine.
They're hiding you.
This guy's daddy's little boy, like all he's had his daddy's paid for, so he's never had a real job.
His whole act falls apart.
He wants to release the criminals back in the streets and you're going to vote for this guy?
Listen, I get it.
I get it about Mehmet Oz.
I get it.
I'm not here to kiss anyone else's ass.
It has not been the greatest campaign over there.
But I'll say one thing about Mehmet Oz.
And by the way, Republicans are not the solution to all your problems, but Democrats are the cause of them.
If you're not voting for Oz and you're voting for this guy, and he wants to dump criminals out in the street, and look at this, it's just a news article.
He wants to decriminalize all drugs and criminalize corporate price hikes, which will destroy Pennsylvania businesses.
If you're voting for that because you don't like Oz's Crudite commercial, I don't know what to tell you.
I really don't.
Is the guy Oz going to turn out to be some great conservative?
No idea.
But I'll say one thing.
I tried to get into medical school.
I didn't make it.
My brother-in-law is a doctor out in Oklahoma.
He's a perinatologist.
He delivers high-risk pregnancies.
Super smart guy.
Love him to death.
One of my best friends in the world.
And for all the knocks on Mehmet Oz, folks, alright, the guy's a first-time candidate.
Hasn't been the greatest campaign ever.
Point stipulated.
I understand.
Man went to medical school and earned his keep.
That's just a fact.
I don't know.
Mehmet Oz dissed me on my radio show.
Wouldn't come on.
I have no personal loyalty to him whatsoever.
But I'm telling you right now, if I was a Pennsylvania voter, there isn't a freaking doubt in my mind I would run to the polls to vote for him over this total loser on the other side.
I don't know how this is even close.
I get it.
There's ill will.
So you're going to let a guy who wants to empty the prisons out?
Decriminalize all drugs?
All fentanyl?
All of it?
Fentanyl too?
What about that?
A guy who wants to criminalize capitalism?
Please, Pennsylvania.
I lived very close to you in Maryland.
Right, Joe?
Western Maryland.
Throw a rock, you'll be happy.
You see it from your house.
Please, please protect us from this guy.
I am asking you as a friend, please save us from this guy.
Okay, enough on this loser.
So this UFO story has me, I mean, maybe an understatement to say fascinated.
I have an uncle, Uncle Lou.
Good man.
Love him to death.
Has some of the greatest comic books I've ever seen in a collection.
Smart guy.
And, uh, we were younger.
He had this fascination with UFOs too.
And you talk about it a lot and, um, I, it got me really into it.
So I've been following this pretty closely.
I see this story pop at the Hill and Joe knows a lot about this too.
I read this headline, and candidly, I had to read it twice because I'm like, okay, so hell, it's a left-leaning outlet.
But when it's not politics and it's UFO stories, the hell will try to play it straight.
Politics, they always play it lefty.
So I see this headline, I'm like, is this right?
Congress implies UFOs have non-human origins?
And I'm thinking, okay, I ran for Congress.
I didn't win, but I met a lot of politicians doing it.
Politicians don't do anything by mistake.
I've said that repeatedly.
Everything's deliberate and done for a reason.
Why would they imply that if they didn't know something we don't?
Listen to this story.
Listen to every word of this.
Screenshot number one here.
Check this out.
So apparently they revised the definition of UFO to include transmedium objects, which according to lawmakers, Transition between space and the atmosphere or between the atmosphere and bodies of water.
Why would they revise that definition if they didn't know something?
You think it's just they were bored on a Sunday?
They note the hill.
In short, members of a key national security focus committee, that's important, believe that objects of unknown origin are demonstrating remarkably advanced technology.
Moving seamlessly between space, air, and water.
A report accompanying the legislation notes that transmedium threats to the United States national security are expanding exponentially.
Folks.
Oh.
Uh, yeah.
You think Congress people who care nothing more about what?
What do they care about?
Staying in power.
That's it.
That's, that's all.
Who are terrified of being called conspiracy theorists and nuts are going to go on the record worried about transmedium technology seamlessly transitioning between the atmosphere and water if they just like some random dude writing a comic book made it up?
It gets worse.
The Hill, look at this, goosebumps.
Look at that, look.
Check that out if you're watching on Rumble.
Yeah.
It goes on, the piece.
It strains credulity to believe that lawmakers would include extraordinary language, yeah, you think, in legislation without compelling evidence, the Hill notes.
Perhaps members have seen the classified censor data that prompted former President Trump's Director of National Intelligence to state that UFOs exhibit technologies we don't have and we are not capable of defending against, end quote.
Most strikingly, Congress's new definition of UFO excludes, excludes man-made objects.
Well, if they're not made by man, because that definition is excluded, then who are they made by?
Folks, listen, I want to be really, really transparent with you here.
I've got a few friends, and I'm not going to claim I have some deep-like insights, but a few friends who are familiar with the activities up on the hill claim this is a really big concern up there.
Apparently, the sensor data, various types of sensors, thermal, radar, infrared, sensors on planes, when you marry up that data, something's not right.
It's not a mistake, it's not a blip, it's not an atmospheric phenomenon.
Some of it is, but that's not what this report is about.
This is about things and phenomenon that legitimately cannot be explained by human activity.
And if it's not human activity, then what kind of activity is it?
What does Congress know?
I get the feeling they're about to tell us something.
Now, very sober analyst, I don't mean drinking sober, I mean a guy who doesn't get hysterical about anything, he's Tom Rogan.
Tom Rogan was on Tucker a bit ago, and Tom Rogan addressed just this, that it's not apparently just the United States who've had this issue with objects that don't appear man-made doing things that are not supposed to be able to do in our atmosphere.
This is a, I don't know how I didn't see this clip sooner.
This is Tom Rogan talking about Russia and other countries who may have lost pilots to these things.
His words, man.
Now, again, this guy's not some hysterical conspiracy guy.
Check this out.
Russia and China have literally lost aircraft chasing these things.
So they're not Russian or Chinese.
So we have a declassified British government document, which is a research document into UFOs, that points out a couple of times, actually, that about four Soviet pilots, perhaps Russian pilots since, were lost trying to engage these aircraft.
Does it say how?
It doesn't say how, and I haven't been able to find out how.
I did hear from someone that engaged was an appropriate term to use, so that they were trying to shoot these things down was the implication.
Okay, so if Russia, China, and the U.S.
all have this experience, then these are not.
These are not.
And I think that's a pretty clear assessment on the part of the military as well.
These are not made by human beings.
Well, yeah, I think that's a fair assessment based on the capabilities, especially with some of the aircraft that the Navy have seen in recent years are manifesting, right?
That you have things going hundreds of knots under the water, anti-gravity, instantaneous hypersonic acceleration, that you have basically capability performance without jet propulsion.
This stuff is not stuff that China or Russia have anywhere near the capability of.
Or that physics can explain.
Exactly.
So why is the Pentagon lying about this?
Why have they lied about it for so long?
I mean, you know, that's the golden question.
I think one reason is that a lot of people in the Pentagon fully don't understand what this is.
I think they come to the conclusion it ain't from here, but beyond that, they're flummoxed.
And you think they have come to that conclusion?
Yes.
Confidently.
They think this is extraterrestrial, just to be totally blunt.
Or extra-dimensional.
Something extra.
Let's put it that way.
So, that's two comments from Guy and one Joe.
Now, wow.
That's a lot.
Maybe a record.
So, again, You know, in the interest of transparency up on the hill, you probably know something we don't.
Journalists now know things that are putting out there about potential existential threats to humanity from technology we can't counter.
But yes, let's keep spending money on the Green New Deal.
Let's do that national defense.
Don't worry about it.
This is really frightening stuff.
We don't want to piss off the aliens either.
No, no, we don't.
Not with technology like that.
Oh no.
Subjugation and servitude doesn't sound like my cup of tea.
Yeah.
It freaks me out too.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Extra dimensional trans mediation, trans medium, non-man-made technologies.
Congress didn't do that by accident.
Okay.
I'm sorry.
Okay, Guy, let's skip ahead to the video thing.
I want to go to this Trump video next.
I haven't seen this Trump video before.
Just a little bit of a comedy break.
It's short, but this is hilarious.
How did I miss this again?
And then Ron DeSantis strikes again, and then a new low for fact checkers.
Really?
Yes, it gets even worse.
Okay, so this is just kind of funny.
I just saw this pop the other day.
Did you guys ever see this video, Trump with Kim Jong-un?
And the press is taking pictures of this bilat meeting of Trump, and he walks in with Kim Jong-un, who's obviously, he's lost a little weight, but was obese at one point.
And when he walks in the room, Trump, in a total alpha move, he looks over to the press and he says this.
Very nice. Getting a good picture of everybody so we look nice and handsome.
The fan is beautiful.
Perfect.
I think, yeah, I'm lucky too, but I love it.
Are you going to make me look skitty?
And then the North Korean translator translated for Kim Jong-un, who's like, you know, rocking a few extra LBs.
That is one of my favorites.
I've never seen that.
That is instantly a top five with Donald Trump.
If you watch it on Rumble, Rumble.com slash Bongino.
The camera, I know!
The camera guy pans, folks, right over to Kim Jong-un.
You've got to see the video.
Rumble.com slash Bongino.
It's really good.
We'll put it on Eclipse channel today too.
It's worth you checking out just for that alone.
You can go to my Rumble.com slash Dan Bongino show Eclipse.
If you just want to see clips of the show, that's fine too.
Okay, some good news.
You know I'm a big fan of Donald Trump, also a huge fan of our governor down here in Florida who's fantastic, Ron DeSantis.
You know the current thing?
You know the left with the current thing, right?
You gotta wear a mask, your vaccine is great, you gotta support Ukraine or you're a crazy person, don't even ask any questions.
Ron DeSantis gets asked a question about all this current thing stuff and masking and the vaccine and all this stuff and for like, this is just a minute of it, but he just fillets the current thingers and calls out The pseudoscience about the mRNA vaccine.
And I'm just bringing it up, and the reason I play this clip, I know it's kind of the Ronda Santa strikes again, it's funny, and we'll get to it in a second, but that clip I posted yesterday on my show of me saying how much I regretted taking this vaccine.
You know, it's just weird how some conservatives out there, or, again, claim to be conservatives, attacked me for it yesterday.
It's, again, it's... Really?
You know.
Yeah, of course.
I mean, I told you, we've had more problems with fake conservatives over the last few weeks than anything else.
The January 6th dude who, you know, that guy, the Phillips guy.
I mean, it's just, it's par for the course, man.
You just, you know, it is what it is.
But, um, yeah, that one kind of stung.
I mean, I explained the situation with the cancer and the wiping out of the immune system.
Right.
And, you know, and you would think like, oh, okay, well, this is a moment where we can all learn from it because I'm acknowledging, but now others are like, remember who stood strong and who didn't.
Weak, you're right.
Totally weak.
Just a pathetic human being.
Sorry example for humankind.
I do remember who stood strong in many cases.
I do.
And the people who are saying some of that, it's all BS.
I promise you.
So on a good note, a guy who stands strong a lot, who I've really come to respect in Florida.
Make sure you go out and vote today, but he's not on the ballot because he has no primary opponent, but Florida voting today.
Ron DeSantis strikes again.
Here it is.
Here's Ron DeSantis going after the current thing.
Check this out.
Now people are doing, looking at the research, are saying, oh man, the masks will hurt the kids.
Now we, we ban the masks in Florida, um, uh, with, with the legislature, with the parents bill of rights and, and, and other actions.
But you know, the reality is that was not grounded in data.
It was not grounded in evidence.
It was basically the current thing.
You know, people would put in their Twitter profile a mask and a syringe, and that was like their identity.
And it was ridiculous.
They lied to us about the mRNA shots.
They said if you take it, you will not get COVID.
That is false.
That is not true.
And they continue to say, even now, when the evidence is so overwhelming, that not only is that not true, people that have multiple boosters, you know, you're at, you're definitely at risk of getting it.
There's no question about that.
So, so it's just time and time again, I think you've seen ideology placed over, over data and evidence.
And then what happens is, is that they will say something like, okay, six weeks of mass will end COVID.
So that's what they claim.
It doesn't happen.
And then what they'll do is they will kind of move the goalposts and say, well, you know, only 95% wore it.
So now and they will constantly try to shift because they will never admit that their ideology was was incorrect.
That last part is the most critical piece of what he said, outside of the poking fun of the current thingers, which is funny and is accurate.
But the last part's the most important, and it's what, for the what, eight years, whatever, I don't ever remember how much we've been doing, how long we've been doing this show.
For the last eight years, that's what's bothered me most about the left.
Despite overwhelming evidence in your face that the problems you claim to have solved, you either didn't solve or in many cases you actually made worse.
Lockdowns, masks, taxes, lack of school choice, whatever the policy, you've made it worse.
Education, healthcare, the economy, COVID.
It doesn't matter.
Lefties continue to vote for the same failures, despite of kicking them right in the nads, that what they said was gonna happen, didn't happen.
And in many cases, the opposite happened.
And they just keep going.
DeSantis gets it.
Alright, here's the last story of the day.
Snopes.
This is hilarious.
You say a new low for fact-checkers?
Believe it or not, yes.
Here's the background.
It involves Ron DeSantis and Florida.
So, the left hates Florida because Miami's doing great, Florida's doing great, people are moving in here in droves.
It's getting more conservative.
People are moving away from horrible, broken, failed liberal blue state models to come down here.
Again, if you're a conservative, you're welcome.
If you're a liberal, I'm asking you as a favor, please don't move to Florida.
Nobody wants you here.
Believe me, nobody wants you here.
Please just stay where you are.
I can't tell you what to do.
I believe in free speech, freedom of movement.
I am a liberty loving American patriot, but I'm asking you as a favor.
We just don't want you around.
So they hate Florida.
So they lie about Florida all the time.
Deaths, Santas, all this other spite that Florida fared quite well during COVID despite the fact that Florida has a lot of older individuals who are more susceptible to COVID.
Kind of weird how we fared pretty good despite having a more susceptible population.
They don't like any of that.
So the lies about Florida are everywhere.
So there was an account on a social media account that had, I guess, a decent following, and the post went viral.
It claimed that this is a list of banned books in Florida because, as you know, Joe, Ron DeSantis is... Wait, are the Hitler comparisons out yet?
A fascist, a Nazi, communist, whatever.
Well, no, they love communists.
A fascist, he's banning books.
So people looked at the banned book lists, including To Kill a Mockingbird, which is on there.
And we were like, really?
That's kind of weird.
Banned book list because, you know, my kids are reading that book or whatever.
That's kind of strange.
So it turns out the banned book list was just made up.
But viral, it went viral on the left because the left are stupid and they'll believe anything.
You understand the left are morons.
They'll believe anything.
So they spread this thing around.
Now, we have fact checkers out there like Snopes that could have easily debunked this thing and rated it as false.
Oh, earlier in the show, what was I saying?
If a post is rated false or partly false, then it's censored on Facebook and you can't see it and it stops the spread of misinformation.
So Snopes checked this.
Is this list of banned books in Florida schools?
Is this a list?
Of banned books in Florida schools and libraries.
Bethany Palmer, again a person with no human dignity whatsoever apparently.
That is false.
It's a fake list.
Everybody's had to acknowledge it.
But notice how they rate it, Joe.
Not false.
They rate it originated as satire.
That's convenient, right?
So now the left can continue to post this fake, fake story about banned books in Florida make DeSantis look bad, and yet it can continue to make its way around Facebook, Twitter, and elsewhere because it's not false.
It originated as satire.
I'm going to do that from now on, Joe.
I'm going to say Joe Biden was born in Jupiter, not Florida, on the planet Jupiter.
And I'm going to insist that he's a space alien like that Hill Report.
And then when I get fact-checked, I'm going to say, satire.
Originated as satire.
I'm sure I'll get the same pass.
It's all deliberate, folks.
These people are very clever.
They are very clever.
All right, thanks again for tuning in.
I really appreciate it.
Please subscribe to the podcast.
It helps us stay on the charts.
I really, really appreciate that.
Subscribe on Apple, Spotify, and Rumble.com slash Bongino.
It really helps us.
And as I said before, if you're up for it and you're processing payments, ParallelEconomy.com.
Get away from these other companies.
In a fight-cancel culture, we're doing our best to create this parallel economy.
