SatW Livestream 2025-11-24: The Princess and the Dragon
In my middle age, I think I'm finally beginning to understand the female mind, and how the instincts of both sexes have been gaslit so that the 3% of abusers can run rampant. We'll be delving into the mythology of femininity, in particular as to how they've been suffering exploitation and abuse, but lacked the proper language to describe it in many cases.
Very much inspired by this article about living with an MtF roommate in college: https://jealousfaithless.substack.com/p/what-happened-in-oregon-part-1
There's a good chance I'll be mentioning @DisaffectedPodcast, so just in case I'll leave this here.
My LinkTree; bookmark it so you can find me if I suddenly disappear from YouTube again: https://linktr.ee/SatW_Aurini
Most of this live stream is hope going to be responding to your brilliant comments.
Now, do we, let me see something.
Do we?
Yeah, things probably look a little bit better that way, don't they?
Before we get started, a couple of announcements.
I have enabled monetization on the channel.
As I said, I'm not interested in e-begging or trying to make a living off of this.
I, well, I had a job and I should have another job soon.
We'll see.
But I also figure, why leave money laying on the ground?
That being said, I don't want to be obnoxious.
So if any of it starts being obnoxious for you, please tell me.
Hey, Prophet of Zombie God, glad you caught me live as well.
And GaiaWave, thank you for being here.
As well to anybody that live comments on the premieres of my videos, I haven't been able to respond yet.
Okay, for some reason, I'm pretty sure.
Let's see if I can type anything in here.
No, I am not able to respond.
I think I need to try deleting cookies.
I haven't got around to it yet.
So all of you that were good enough to live respond on my regular videos, I hugely appreciate that.
And I'm so sorry I wasn't replying to you.
I was trying to.
Also, there's a live video coming out tomorrow morning about the nature of the mystery religions that will exist during the age of Aquarius.
It's very 40 minutes long.
I hope you enjoy it.
I'm turning into quite the fan of these classes as well.
They're quite obnoxious and fun.
But the intro topic for this video, the princess and the dragon.
Or did I say serpent?
Princess and the serpent.
Either way.
You know, as I get older, I think I'm finally starting to truly understand women.
And so I wanted to give you guys this analogy.
Imagine you were a princess trapped in a dungeon guarded by a dragon.
And time and time again, men came by, heroic men came to defeat the dragon and then steal some of the treasure and run off.
You start to get pissed off at men, wouldn't you?
Part of what inspired me to talk about this matter was if you look in the description, there's a oh, do I have it?
Yeah, I can see it right here.
Her name is Jealous Faithless on Substack.
And let's not upset the Google gods.
It's her very, very honest account of rooming in her first year of college with A woman who wouldn't be considered a woman in all of the 51 states.
Mainly considered a woman in California.
Is it 51 states, 49?
I'm sorry, I've got no idea, and how abusive this person was.
Like what she's describing is pure psychological abuse.
And I speak as somebody who's been down that road before more times than I care to admit women, especially young women have okay.
Like the rescue from the dragon.
Every woman wants a knight in shining armor that's going to rescue her from the dungeon that she's in.
It's going to rescue her from the control of her parents, liberate her, and make her his wife.
There's this real instinctual need for that.
And they tend to be during the first half of their lives.
Women are submissive is the correct word.
That gets a bad rap these days.
They're very, they're nurturing.
They're accommodating.
Young men are eager to prove themselves.
They're eager to make waves.
Young women don't want to make waves.
They want to, they want to be good girls.
Right?
And then young men want to be good boys by being aggressive heroes.
And so when you gaslight women, when you gaslight them and tell them that they have to accept that this thing, this reality, which is this lie, you have to accept this lie as reality, or you're a bad person.
Well, they're going to go along with that.
And then an aggressive or exploitative man is going to take advantage of them.
He's going to sneak into the dungeon, not to snitch her away, but just to steal some of her treasure.
And of course, us young men were being gaslit as well.
One particular story stands out, where like way back in the day, what was this, like 2014 or something?
I decided I was going to put minimal effort into a Halloween costume and just made a little Brotherhood of Nod symbol and pinned it to the arm of my jacket.
And this guy at the bar aggressively came up to me and said, oh, I just wanted to make sure it wasn't one of those bent crosses.
And it's one of those stories that kind of sticks with me because I kind of wish I told him to F off a little bit louder than I did.
Like, oh, what if I am dressed like a soldier from a war from 70 years ago?
What about that?
What are you going to do about it?
I certainly didn't accommodate him, but I didn't tell, I didn't challenge him, which I kind of wish I had.
Although, is that his fault?
The same way the girls were gaslit into, if you don't radically accept these people that your instincts are telling you to run far away from.
Us young men were taught: if you don't aggressively pursue this mythical villain that doesn't actually exist anywhere in the modern world, then you're a bad man.
That is how you prove yourself.
You know, be like Tony Stark in Iron Man 3.
Castrate yourself and buy your wife a strap-on.
That's what a real man does.
As women age, they start moving into a more masculine phase, which is where they stop going on.
Now, if you think about the biology, like the biology left to its own devices.
So, young women are very agreeable.
Usually, the parents would be involved in finding the husband, you know, not arranged marriages per se, but you have to ask permission for her hand in marriage.
And so, they'd have a relatively good husband that would be trying to establish himself in the world.
You know, whether he's trying to join a guild in the medieval era or if he's trying to hunt the mammoth in the primordial era.
He is by the way, Serena.
I don't know if you caught the beginning.
Thank you so much for your comments on the live videos.
For some bloody reason, I haven't been able to reply, but I have read everything and I really appreciate it.
On the premiere videos, I should say, not the live video.
This trying to aggressively establish a career, being agreeable and going along with everything is kind of the optimal strategy.
Especially like she's going to be so overwhelmed having children that it's going to be the emphasis on taking care of everybody else but herself.
And it's not until the children start to get older that a woman starts to realize that, hey, you know, I've done all this for other people.
It's about time for me to start looking out for number one, which is about the same phase of life where men have established themselves and they tend to revert into a more feminine and sensitive and nurturing role.
Like if you like Santa Claus, for example, Santa Claus, like, and you know, there's this older boomer I know who is, he's just this fantastic guy.
He sets up these Christmas parties, does these really elaborate Halloween displays at his house?
He has a side bus where he really tries to employ people to help him.
Like it's, it's a, it's, it's very masculine, but it's like a masculine, nurturing, quasi-feminine role.
So in the natural state of things, this is when women become a bit more assertive in their 30s and their 40s.
This is where the healthy form of Karen exists, where Karen isn't the let me see the manager nag.
She's the old librarian that cracks the ruler down saying, no, you're not doing that nonsense in here.
Don't make me talk to your mom, Jimmy.
You know you're not supposed to be doing this.
That's actually a very positive social role.
But both sexes have been gaslit.
The women have been gaslit to ignore that 3% of men that are like genuinely toxic.
And also to invite just anybody into dungeon to rape that treasure.
The men have been gaslit to go after enemies that don't exist and to treat women like they're men.
And so by the time women start getting to that more assertive phase in life, they're often so embittered by the abuse that they've suffered, either at the hands of bad men who wantonly exploited them, or quite frankly, regular men that were playing this feminist equality rule set, which we were never meant to follow in the first place.
Now, I'll tell you, one of the real tragedies.
So, the gender roles that we used to assign to people, yes, they were repressive.
Of course, they were.
It was a one-size-fits-all.
You know, they don't make custom-fitted baby clothing because you're going to grow out of it in a few months.
You don't custom roles are a little bit restrictive, but they also helped emphasize the differences between the sexes and encourage a healthier starting point.
It's one thing, like, listen, I'm 44 now, okay?
And I think I'm finally starting to understand women, which is a little bit late to build the whole thing from the ground up.
You know, you have to learn the rules to break the rules.
And the rules, the traditional rules, many of them are arbitrary.
Pink and blue are arbitrary.
It doesn't matter what the colors are.
What matters is that the colors mean something.
And it, you know, you have to learn the steps in a dance before you can become an expert dancer.
So let's check some of these comments.
Book of Tobias.
Is that the rest of development?
I'm not sure what you're referring to there.
I'm curious.
With Edge Lord.
Pleasure to join you again.
Pleasure to have you here.
Oh, and let me.
It's still on top chat.
It's still on top chat.
I want live chat.
There we go.
Yeah, because I did see your questions, but I don't know if you were still on the stream at that point.
Strange question.
I have long, luscious hair, you son of a bitch.
I've been considering going bald for convenience and practical reasons.
Is it worth it?
I mean, man, I miss having hair, right?
I'm lucky.
I look good without it.
So, like, I'm not going to complain.
I look good without it, right?
I've got nothing to complain about.
Like, for convenience sake, if it's that much of an issue, like, just go for a Caesar cut or something like that.
But honestly, I'd take advantage of it.
Like, you don't know.
Honestly, I'd take advantage of it.
Like, you don't know how you're going to hair.
You might as well luxuriate in your beautiful masculine locks as long as you have them.
Let's see.
I really do not want to lose the spiritual individuality of my hair.
However, as a past ball person, as a young child, I also desire the inherent discipline and practicality of the style, which is best.
I say enjoy it, but on the other hand, I don't miss having to go to the barber.
Shame it hippies as cotton clothing enjoyer.
You can always try it out, too.
I mean, like, hey, try different stuff out, man.
You know, like, you only live once, so, you know, wear a hat, go to Denny's, do what you feel like, man.
There have been, I do have a few risks from some of the things I've done, but generally speaking, people mostly regret what they never bothered trying.
So, if you want to do it, give it a shot.
And who knows?
Maybe you'll like it better that way.
Nothing's saying you can't grow it back if you want.
How is my experience shape-shifting?
Um, shape-shifting, I can't tell you anything about communing with the ancestors.
Well, here's one of the things they told me: that we all go through these natural phases of life,
and one of the great gaps of our era is twisting the nature of each stage of life.
So one of the stages of life, especially for us young men, is the stage of Aries.
It's the stage of being the young hero.
And, you know, quite frankly, this is the I did the stage fine.
I was on the football team, and I wasn't particularly good on the football team, but I was on the football team, joined the military as a young man.
Like, I've got nothing to be ashamed of.
And yet, when I was growing up, which would be like that'd be early 90s, graduated in 99.
This was the kind of the height of Revenge of the Nerds.
It was the pre-geek culture.
Now, if you grew up in the aughts, this was kind of the height of being, well, being a gamma male, quite frankly.
One of the things I regret as one of the early internet nerds was without realizing it, participating in this, like these days we call it Reddit subculture, right?
Like, I didn't realize just how toxic these Reddit nerds were.
And that I just because I love Star Wars and Star Trek, you know, that doesn't mean I belong there.
These people are pathological garbage, and it's not geeks versus jocks.
The geeks and the jocks are the same people.
All right, like half the guys I knew in the army, they're always quoting freaking the Matrix movie or Transformers.
Geeks are the same.
There's a fantastic video.
Who is it?
Bye.
I know he lives in Texas, but I can't remember his name.
Bye.
I know he lives in Texas, but I can't remember his name.
But the title of the video is Theater Kid Occupied Government.
It's the geeks and the jocks versus the theater kits.
And it's not geeks versus jocks.
But here's the irony is that during my high school and even later, I always felt like I wasn't tough enough, even though, again, it's ridiculous.
I studied martial arts.
I was in the army.
I was in the football team.
And yet, the paradigm was that if you weren't a dumb jock that liked sports ball, then you were a geek with an inferiority complex.
Like, I was so unconfident with girls in high school, which is ridiculous.
Mind you, I was going through a lot in my personal life as well.
Didn't have the easiest childhood.
Had a lot of voices telling me I wasn't worthy of love.
But the time of Aries is not the time you don't have to be the champion to have a good Aryan time.
You just have to compete.
You just have to have fun.
And there's so there's all these phases we go through in life.
And the narrative, the narrative seems to be designed to convince us, instead of looking up and enjoying it, to look down and see all the problems in it.
At least that's a mistake I have made in life.
And Serena, I'm glad what you said.
You feel like you're eavesdropping.
That's fantastic.
I'm standing sexists understand one other better.
You know, part of the reason, part of the reason uniforms exist in the military is so you can immediately identify who somebody is.
I was just watching this fantastic video on the uh the the Pickelhaube, which is that fantastic helmet from World War One that the the Germans wore.
Um, it's actually a leather helmet.
Can you believe that?
Completely useless on the battlefield, but it looks great.
And if you're wondering what that spike on the top was all about, it was so that you could immediately identify what trade the person was in.
So the spike is infantry, actually.
And there's there's different ones for artillery, etc.
Same thing with the crest on the front.
There are a whole bunch of different crests that would identify regiment, unit, etc.
The uniform is meant to make you immediately identifiable.
And same those are dress standards for courtesy for manners in general.
Disaffected podcast.
I think it was two weeks ago.
He was talking, maybe three weeks ago.
He was talking about how During a funeral, the reason people dress in black, the reason that you hang a black wreath on your door, it's to communicate that we are going through major grief right now and we are not up to business as usual.
And the reason you wear black to the funeral is to acknowledge the grief of the immediate family members and to say, I am here in whatever capacity you need me.
The differing uniforms of men and women and the expected protocols for how you speak to one another, those were there to formalize things.
As opposed to the shares of an 18-year-old college girl who, against the wishes of her parents, has been convinced that the brave and courageous thing to do is to take on a roommate who's only technically a woman in California and then suffer immense psychological manipulation and abuse.
One of the things from this article: the roommate kept leaving their panties on her side of the dorm room, which is just a thing that she ignored.
Oh, it must have just been an accident the past 20 times.
Surely they're not.
And God bless her for figuring out after four months that, no, this is wrong and radically going against her the beliefs she'd been told were wholly righteous and seeking a new roommate.
I really do recommend reading that article, guys, and trying to understand that this is kind of the not the ideology, but her approach to dealing with this conflict was very, very feminine.
Despite all this nonsense, boss, boss, babe, whatever, this is actually the intrinsic feminine.
Heck, when girls are going all boss babe, they're going boss babe because they're being agreeable and they're just putting on the outfit of disagreeable.
Just because she dresses punk or goth doesn't mean she's not still a woman, after all.
Too many scars on your scalp for bald.
What have you been getting up to, brother?
Join the Marine Corps to make others proud.
God bless you, man.
The Marines are solid.
I gotta, you know what?
I'm just gonna tell you the punchline of the joke.
The way I normally tell this joke is because, like, I did go down to Fort Knox and we did some training with the Americans.
And so I tell it like a real story where we were talking to a couple of Marine Corps guys, and I had a buddy with alligator skin boots.
And the Marine guys asked him where he got it.
Like, I tell it's like a real story, which is this is how you should tell jokes.
If you can convince people, it's a real story until the punchline, you'll really get them.
But, you know, they ask where he got the boots, and he said he just ran out to the training area and he beat up an alligator and took some of them.
So then these Marine Corps guys disappear and we're sent on search parties for them.
Eventually, we stumble into this glade, and there's the Marine Corps guys just like wailing on this alligator until finally gives up the ghost and they flip it over and they're like, geez, that's not wearing boots either.
Seriously, I love you, Marine Corps guys.
Hoorah!
Predators are somehow contrarians and current thing cultists.
Strange dichotomy.
You know, there was, there's a book by David Brin called Otherness, a collection of his short stories.
And like, listen, I was ideologically one of these people.
Okay?
I'm so ashamed to admit this, but I got brainwashed into that same cult.
And he has this whole essay, Otherness, about speeches he was given at a comic book convention, which, you know, consult Vox Day if you want to find out about all the abuse problems that were happening in sci-fi fandom 30 years ago.
And he was bragging about how our culture is better because we think every other culture is better.
Which is simultaneously rebellious and brainwashed at the same time.
It's the.
There's a writer I really like on Substack, Libertarian Feudalism.
And he talks a lot about that the Jungian individuation process is about crucifying yourself between two irreconcilable ideas.
Faith and reason.
Those are two of them.
To have both faith and reason, because you're never going to find God with reason.
And yet, but there's individuation and then there's ego collapse.
And the union of two opposites, which is that David Brin conception of otherness, that union is self-annihilation into nihilism, which is, yeah, the core of the Redditor.
I'm so glad I didn't ever see this movie.
But...
But about 20 years ago or so, there's a movie, it was like Dr. Evil's Dr. Evil's sing-along party or something like that.
And it's about a theater kid kidnapping a girl that wanted to sleep with the jock.
Truly pathetic.
And yet immensely popular in the early 2000s.
Aryan with an eye as in Aries.
Not Aryan as in the Proto-Indo-European prophet of zombie gods.
This, by the way, earlier when I mentioned the book of Tobias, it's in reference to your metaphor of the Prince and Dragon.
In Tobias, a woman marries a man, a demon kills him.
She marries six more men, all of whom the demon also kills.
Bias conquers the demon and takes her to be his true wife and her true husband.
That is a fantastic story.
I, you know what?
I am there, I got a I gotta read that one.
So that's exactly what I'm talking about here.
Beginning of the book of Tobias is one of the most metal stories in the book.
Hellegally buries bodies for honors, and God's sake, only to go home and sleep outside is unclean for a bird to shit in your eyes, rendering you blind.
Yeah, welcome to life, eh?
I hate being screamed at so I don't think I could handle the military.
Well, don't get screamed in the modern military.
No, getting screamed at isn't so bad.
You get screamed at when you screw up, right?
That's um that's one of the big reliefs I found in the military is that I could control whether or not I got screamed at.
You come from a particular type of background that it can be quite a relief.
You know, there's another post on Substack earlier, earlier today, I believe.
It was from Vulpko from Tex Arcane.
If you guys don't know Tex Arcane, you should get to know him.
He is half the stuff he says, I still think, sounds crazy.
And yet, half of the crazy stuff he's said over there says 100% accurate.
So, fair enough if you want to take him with a grain of salt.
And he's wrong about Tartaria, but I'm not going to beef with it.
I don't care about Tartaria.
It's not crucial.
There are a couple of things he's objectively wrong about, but I'm very confident that he's wrong about them, but they don't really matter.
His larger worldview is correct.
He's a lot like Owen Benjamin in that way.
Like, sometimes Owen Benjamin gets some stuff really wrong when he doesn't know anything about it.
But then he says stuff like Round Earther, Flat Earther.
Owen Benjamin says he's a two hills earther because from his porch he can see two hills.
like that.
And he was posting something about the Star Trek there.
Star Trek and also, oh, who was it?
War Between the Worlds.
War Between the Worlds, Time Machine.
Who wrote those?
Early, early.
And it wasn't Jules Verne.
It was after Jules Verne.
It's driving me nuts.
Somebody toss it into the comments, please.
But he also had a book that was turned into a very early, I think, pre-sound film.
H.G. Wells, thank you.
Things to come, or prophecies of things to come.
It was...
Well, the crazy thing is, it's the same plot as Star Trek.
It's the same plot that's being enacted in real time right now.
It's the same plot as 1984.
That World War III was so devastating that we created a idea no longer based upon nationalism, ethnicity, or populism, but we replaced it with scientific management.
And in these scientifically managed societies, women are treated like homosexuals.
One of my one of the extremely valid criticisms of feminism, like when you think about that poor 18-year-old girl living with this abusive man, you can understand the appeal of feminism, particularly old girl living with this abusive man.
You can understand the appeal of feminism, particularly the TERF form of it.
You can understand that.
The TERFs are right about a lot of things.
But the fundamental nature of feminism, the fundamental nature of philosophy is masculine.
It's very, very analytical and left-brained.
Aside from the continentals, but let's not get into that.
And so feminism, as an exercise of philosophy, inevitably embraces the masculine.
And so this, anytime feminism tries to like either feminism diverts into all sex is the R word, or women should act like homosexual men.
It's always either pro-sex or anti-sex feminism.
Pro.
I don't want to use acronyms for everything.
You guys understand what I'm saying.
I don't want to upset the YouTube gods, but I also feel incredibly silly using euphemisms constantly.
The fundamental issue is that the nature of woman is to be us men, the left and right hemispheres of our brains are very differentiated.
We can have very powerful intuitions and we can have very powerful logical constructs, but we're going to struggle between the two.
I've done testing that shows I am very center-brained.
Certainly my effectiveness when it comes to divination, like I'm very good at it.
Would like that's a right-brained ability.
And so I am very powerful in left and right hemisphere, but they're also constantly at war with one other.
Like struggles I go through are my brain going back and forth and having conversations between the two hemispheres.
Whereas women, there's far greater connection between the two.
So women, so what you get with women is they're more their left brain is more practical.
They see the practicality in everything.
And the intuiting brain is immediately telling them, like, this is a bad situation, this is a good guy, etc.
There's less argumentation between the two halves, but because there's less argumentation, there's less differentiation.
When it comes to abstract thinking and abstract intuition, like men are going to be on the extremes, which is why women are so useful for grounding us and reminding us of what we already know, whether it's what we know on the practical side or if it's what we know, like you should your boss working against that thing.
We get lost in the abstracts on both sides.
But because of that, women aren't very good philosophers.
And so the philosophy of Star Trek scientific materialism or of 1984, like this technocracy that is going to be an ongoing construct during the entire age of Aquarius, okay?
Aquarius is a technocrat.
Aquarius is also very powerfully psychic, but Aquarius is a technocrat.
Fixed air sign as opposed to cardinal or mutable.
The cardinal signs are at the start of the season or mutable.
The cardinal signs are at the start of the season.
They're a ship sign.
I am extremely Libra.
I'm extremely cardinal air sign.
The fixed is the mature, established sign, and the mutable is leaving the season.
The flexible intellectual sign.
And Aquarius, extremely fixed, extremely confident and arrogant.
And Aquarius likes spreadsheets more than they like scientific inquiry or radical dreaming.
So the technocracy is going to kind of be a thing for the next 2,000 years.
But the Star Trek technocracy, it treats women like homosexuals.
In the same way, that Playboy, the whole Hugh Hefner lifestyle is homosexuality for straight men.
And the problem with sexuality is that an old homosexual and an old feminist have two choices: exploit the youth or be invisible.
This is why a large subset of older homosexuals become extremely predatory.
I don't think it's anywhere near the majority, but it's a hugely disproportionate section of them.
It's because unbridled male desire pursues youth In the same way that when you're looking for a job, you like getting a signing bonus.
But the signing bonus is there because it's trusting that you're going to push long-term generative thing.
Long-term generative thing.
And so when you try and start treating women like men sexually, women like men sexually, you're going to start exploiting the women.
And there's the subset of people that the left likes to defend them.
I don't.
And they're all Star Trek fans.
That's why.
Because there's no limitations on sexuality in Star Trek.
I mean, hey, if the kids can learn calculus when they're 12, then I guess they're ready for.
Oh, by the way, that's, if you don't know what the heck I'm getting on about, something like 99% of the people arrested for those crimes are huge Trekkies.
It's rare to find one who isn't a Trekkie.
That being said, and yes, I really like the next generation growing up.
That being said, Gene Roddenberry was not without merit.
Give the devil his due.
The thing I admired about the Star Trek universe was that it was like, what if, to go to Ken Wilbur, to integral theory, AQAL?
This is what PsychoMath talks about all the time.
The Star Trek universe is essentially one where the majority of people are at level seven.
But it's being imagined by somebody that was at level six.
Gene Roddenberry was actually very, he took advantage of a lot of women.
And the women he took advantage of were trying to prove how enlightened they were.
So they didn't complain about it.
I think Crosby, Tasha Yar, I think she really got eaten up and spit out by that whole thing.
The same thing with the actress that played Princess Leia.
She had a rough go of it, right?
She's just trying to be the cool girl that got along with everybody, but deep down she knew she was being exploited.
The guys were coming to seize her gold and not actually save her from the dragon's lair.
So yeah, there is something really cool to Star Trek.
And Gene Roddenberry lived a very adventurous, courageous life.
So I don't want to paint him like he's a demon or something.
He wasn't.
But his conception of women as identical to men led to him rationalizing an exploitation of women that was fundamentally like he treated women like they were in the gay bathhouse, frankly.
Which is why other types of depraved men love the Star Trek universe, because if you can treat women like that, then you can treat like that.
It's kind of implicit there.
You notice it wasn't until Deep Space Nine that we actually saw narrative investigation of a marriage, which wasn't always the best marriage, but at least it investigated the marriage.
Star Trek the Next Generation, there's no concept of marriage.
Yeah, O'Brien and oh, what was her name?
Yeah, they were married, but it never really dug into the difficulties of being Deep Space Nine, it absolutely did.
So, I've just finished binge-watching Brass Eye.
I do not know what that is.
Please tell me in the comments.
And Armored Ghost says, How fast the Internet of the Arctic was pretty solid, but they did block gaming and Netflix.
So, I had no problem with YouTube, but there were limitations placed not to overwhelm the system.
I assume it was all done through satellite because we were outside of helicopter range.
Okay.
Geez, there was a there was a guy that got injured, like broken legs on one of the ships due to a rogue wave.
It was chased before they fly him out.
I assume they had him on, I assume they just had him like totally comatose from painkillers.
It was a great environment to be working in.
And no, I'm not going to tell you where it was exactly, just that, yeah, it was north of the Arctic Circle.
I long for a world where we recognize that God hates us all until we prove we're not shit.
Oh, God's always happy.
Oh, wait, no, he's always mad.
Oh, it's hard to say.
You know, that neoliberalism, neoliberal feudalism, he's been posting, he's been reading Philip K. Dick's Mopus, which, as you might expect, is nothing but pure insanity with no answers whatsoever.
And so, and which made neoliberal feudalism reflect on the fact that his endless essays about the fractal nature of belief, self-awareness, and government corruption and the futility of it all were also completely insane with no resolution.
As I replied to him, I told him a story.
So, a friend of mine had to go in for surgery recently.
And his very young daughter asked him what surgery was.
Now, he didn't want to lie to her, even though she's a young child.
So he told her a toned-down version of what surgery is.
And she started crying.
She said, Papa, that scared me.
You made me, Papa.
Didn't you know that's scary?
And he told me this story, I started learning, like, oh man.
I said, buddy, what you need to tell that kid got telling her that Uncle Leo's visited hell and heaven.
He's been both places, and even he doesn't know what God is or if he exists.
Oh, it's just an endless fractal.
I mean, you can choose to believe that you have an answer, which, you know, all the power to you if you do, but I know that hell and heaven are real, but I don't know what to tell you about God.
Prophet of Zombie God, I lived as a woman for six months to really understand the MTF mind.
Gay or straight, female cosplay or not, men are men.
We need to re-examine masculinity, but with an intent on honor.
Bro, that's really interesting, man.
You should definitely write about it.
I don't know.
I don't know if you want to come on here sometime and talk about it.
Like, I get that's but that's really interesting.
There is a book written by a lesbian that cosplayed as a man for six months that really opened up her eyes to the difficulties of being a man.
I wish there was more, like, it's we are just so primed to completely misunderstand the other sex, right?
Like, I think we all know, like, all of us men know the frustration with being taught to be a nice guy.
And that, no, girls don't like nice guys finish last, right?
Like we all, we could talk about that till the cows come home.
I just think our understanding of the other sex has been very, very subverted deliberately.
What a woman wants, what a woman needs.
That's a good way of putting it.
Hey, man, you're not bombing the comments.
The comments are fantastic.
I got nothing going without comments.
I mean, I could probably BS a bunch of stuff, but okay, so Brass Eye is a British satire about the media in the late 90s.
Its creator and presenter, Chris Morris, also wrote Four Lines, a British movie satisfying and mocking Islamic terrorism.
Been making videos for years under different names, but I'd be honored to come on the segment one day.
Fire me a message on Twitter if that works for you.
And yes, it's been subverted on purpose.
There is a fantastic conspiracy theory from Pohl, about five years old.
I'm sure I posted it before.
And conspiracy theory goes like this: well, there's two that are complementary.
The first one is that The algorithms on social media, they don't care if you're happy or angry, they just care that you engage.
And so, if you engage with something, they'll show you more of it.
And the algorithms want to sell you stuff.
And to sell you something, it's more useful to place you in a slot.
Like, what are you?
Are you a single man?
Are you a married man?
Are you a rich 40-year-old man trying to rediscover his youth with stupid Star Wars toys?
Are you a conservative?
Are you a liberal?
What are you?
And so, not only are we going to label you in one of these boxes, we're going to show you to push you deeper into that box.
Ergo, much of the political polarization that we see is driven by marketing algorithms.
Because the more you are angry about X, the easier we can sell you stuff.
The other really interesting conspiracy theory comes from a user that claimed he worked for one of the beauty product manufacturers, and they were running an experimental campaign down in South America, Brazil, I believe.
And what they were attempting to do using Freudian psychology was to transmute to create a hyper sigil to convince women that beauty isn't something you're born with.
B, a product you buy on the shelf.
Externalizing beauty.
You know, if you think about the difference between finding a like a fitted suit that complements your figure again, I'm a Libra ruled by Venus, okay?
Okay, I like fashion, you might have noticed.
And especially when it comes to leather jackets, it's all about the fit.
I used to sell leather jackets, and it's a jacket that looks great on one guy will look terrible on the other.
You kind of just have to find the right leather jacket for your build.
It complements you.
A leather jacket complements you when you find the right one.
But what they were attempting to do was create a hypersigil that made it not about like the beauty is not emphasizing what you already have, but it's a product on the shelf purchase to get plus one to beauty.
And they were so successful in this campaign that transsexualism exploded because they inadvertently, what they realized was that there's a huge segment of men who would be happy to embody beauty themselves.
Let me ask you fellas, have you ever sent her a D-pick and she didn't appreciate it at all?
Us men have a natural like there's this uh yeah, yeah, the defined phase.
Yes, there is this extremely visual appreciation of female beauty inherent to men, whereas women are more prone to appreciating male accomplishment.
They like to see the footballer winning the football and the muscles that go along with that.
So that not that there isn't a huge appreciation for male beauty, like guys, if you're not lifting weights, you're leaving money on the ground.
Okay, yes, there's huge appreciation for male beauty, but male beauty is more connected with accomplishment with performance.
And so it doesn't matter how big your D is or how symmetrical and beautiful, which I'm sure all of you have very beautiful penises, a random picture of one won't do much for a girl.
And so there's this latent, wouldn't it be nice if they just appreciated us for our bodies the way we appreciated them?
And if you dig too deep into that form of jealousy, then eventually you arrive at, well...
if I can't be a beautiful man, maybe I'll become a beautiful woman.
And look, this advertising campaign tells me I can just buy their product and it will make me luxurious and beautiful.
This is, what do they call it?
It's the fantasy eroticization of the self.
And listen, all of us guys have it to one degree or another.
We've all taken a picture of ourselves, you know, like flexing our arms after we just were lifting weights.
Autoerotic.
No, it's not, is it?
Something like that.
And so when this company started bombarding Brazil with this, with all of these advertisements that had this subtext that you could purchase beauty off the shelf, you wound up with an explosion of male-to-female transsexuality in the region.
The boss babe thing is the same thing in reverse, incidentally.
The...
There are so many women.
Women desire male accomplishment.
They want a hero.
But heroes are in short supply these days.
And most of the guys they've dated only want to steal the gold.
They don't want to defeat the dragon.
They don't want to rescue the maiden.
And so, so many of these girls start auto-erotically trying to become the man that they desire.
Things are seriously twisted, folks.
Let's check these comments.
Oh, speaking of brass eye, there were two fantastic CBC series.
One was, well, this is just pure Gen X comedy trash.
I don't know if it's good or not.
It's called Twitch City.
It's just loser Gen Xers with no prospects living in Toronto back in the 90s.
There's one point where the roommate's girlfriend and the roommate were coming up with all these idiotic rationalizations of like, well, I wouldn't be cheating if I was just walking on you in the shower.
Like, no, totally, it wouldn't be cheating.
Or if I like slipped and fell on you, that wouldn't be cheating.
No, that just happens sometimes.
Twitch City was hilarious.
There's another great series about it was all these psychopathic news anchors.
Like it was sort of like news radio, but less comedic and more psychopathic.
God, what was that called?
If any of you remember that series, toss in the comments.
was brilliantly cynical.
Let's see.
Out for the night.
Glad to have you, Prophet Zombie.
Autogynophilia.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Autogynophilia.
Like, imagine a bunch of women lusting after you while you were doing the Cabana Boy dance.
Now, I put it like that.
It feels ridiculous, and it is ridiculous.
But, you know, if you could get away with it.
The Becky Lynch effect.
Even her husband wears her old clothes.
I should probably be happy that I don't know who Becky Lynch is, shouldn't I?
Okay, yeah, you tagged me in a post.
Perfect.
Perfect.
You have a good night, sir.
stay frosty so I'm gonna go for another 25 minutes but I better come up with some sort of material I think I mentioned earlier that one of the channels I really like is the Disaspective podcast.
And one of the major topics he covers is child abuse.
And there's a.
There is.
There's a question I can't answer.
Certainly, children got there's a lot more corporal punishment back in the day than there is today, particularly.
Well, okay, so here's a like here's a theory: yes, there was more corporal punishment 50, 100 years ago, but generally it was more formalized.
One of the crazy things, and Kingdom Come Deliverance, one of the real disconnects in that game, which I hardly recommend, it's a it is almost as good as actually visiting the medieval era to understand how people thought.
Um, I don't think it's perfect, there are some spots in it.
All right, if you don't know, KCD, it's a medieval RPG set in the real world.
It's like a medieval peasant life simulator, where it's a bit exaggerated.
Like you get to get to hunt bandits and blacksmith, and you get to be a lawyer in a heresy trial, which realistically you don't get to do all those things in one life.
So it's exaggerated in that sense.
But the general understanding of the medieval era and how systems and society operated back then, it's generally very, very accurate.
It's very good.
I strongly recommend the series.
And one of the examples of the disconnects is that poaching used to be a death sentence.
And one of the things that you're tasked with doing at certain points is capturing some poachers and bring them back to be hanged.
Because it's not like we had money or resources to put people back then.
And they can talk these guys into coming back to be hanged.
Which kind of sounds crazy.
Like, imagine if a speeding ticket was getting well, imagine if getting caught speeding was not just you're put to death.
It was imagine you're being tortured to death.
How many of you would go voluntarily if that were the case?
Probably not too many.
And yet people frequently did submit.
Well, the same way that how many people submit to jail time for sharing spicy memes on British Facebook, spicy memes on British Facebook.
So that's what I find so interesting.
It's completely realistic.
And when you're playing the game, you understand that it's realistic.
But also maybe to question the nature of the whole justice system to begin with.
Now, wait, I'm pretty sure I was going somewhere with that, but it's kind of evaporated.
Where the heck I was going.
Right, we're talking about beating kids.
Medieval justice was far more brutal.
We didn't have the money and resources to lock people in prison for 10 years.
And we tended to have more of a you know, if you torture somebody to death, maybe less people will commit the crime.
That was one of the general assumptions back then.
Whether or not it's true, who knows?
Not the point of this.
You know, I heard from my parents that my grandparents used to have a paddle.
And the paddle had this cartoon picture of this naughty child just like with his pants down with a red bottom, just screaming his face off.
Docking out a turn.
That's a paddling.
Now, another story.
I don't think this is for my family.
I think I heard this somewhere else.
Where when the kids misbehaved, they had to go out to the backyard to cut a switch off one of the bushes, and that was the switch that'd be used to paddle them.
Which is pretty dramatic to our current sensibilities.
But it was also formalized.
The latest effect podcast started with a video of a mother and school teacher absolutely losing her mind and beating her young son with a leather belt.
But it's not like, what's so awful about that video?
It's not a physical pain, it's the unbridled nature, the unpredictability of the angry adult.
I am not 100% peaceful parenting like Stefan Molyneux.
I think there are some...
It depends on the kid.
There...
Some kids need to test the rules.
And I think there may be a call for some kids that, like, once or twice, oh, you don't want to do a timeout, then you're going to get a spanking and a timeout.
But it's not about the parent losing control.
What's terrifying about that video is the parent losing control.
About them.
You know, the grandfather or great-grandfather, whomever Sent the kid out to go get a switch, and now you're going to get five whacks in your bare bum.
It's dispassionate, it's something the kid can control.
That, well, you did the bad thing, now the bad thing happens to you.
And if you don't want the bad thing, don't do this bad thing.
The kid has to face the music, but ultimately has control over it.
Whereas the abuse that is present in that recent video, the kid getting beaten with the belt, it's less about the belt.
And it's more that the kid's got no control over it.
Whatever it is that they did, the mother was yelling about the house being a mess.
So the kids leave their toys out.
That's something kids do.
Sometimes they leave their toys out.
And they shouldn't leave their toys out.
That's like one of the things you teach your kids is you clean stuff up when you're done with it.
But if they don't clean it up, the punishment should be predictable.
When a case in this parent, there is no predictability.
It's one night the parent might laugh.
Oh, you silly kid, you're supposed to clean that up.
And the next night, same thing happens, and they absolutely blow their top and they're yelling and screaming and telling the kid that they're not worthy of love.
Like you don't even actually need to hit the kid for it to be abuse.
That's one of the questions I can't answer you.
Were people more psycho and abusive 500 years ago?
I wish I could answer that question.
I was just listening to, I think it was a video by Scary Interesting about a mutiny which occurred.
A mutiny on a ship that was largely carrying civilians.
It was a peacetime trading ship carrying civilians, but there was one man who was a heretic.
He was even a heretic I kind of sympathize with.
Like, I probably would endorse his heresy, quite frankly.
Like, it wasn't even a huge heresy.
It's just that, like, his heresy is that some creepy paintings are valid.
That was his heresy.
And yet, this guy ran a mutiny that wound up murdering women and children and sending people to their deaths so that he and his cohort could take advantage of the surviving women and children.
Monstrous.
absolutely monstrous what this guy did.
So, you know, like, you examine something like that.
So, have we got better than that?
Because things like that still happen once in a blue moon.
We do occasionally hear these absolute horror stories of children locked in basements, but they are the exception these days.
Is it that we've become more peaceful?
Or is it just that law enforcement is more effective?
It's hard to get away with that sort of nonsense these days.
On the other hand, it seems to me that people a hundred years ago had a lot more moral sense.
Maybe our institutions weren't as good as they are now, but individual humans seem to be a lot better at doing morality a hundred years ago.
Okay, could it be that the moral turpitude, which well, the moral turpitude you and I are witnesses to only goes back two, three, maybe four generations?
You can't really witness your great-great-grandparents.
The stories of your great-great-grandparents are so diluted at this point that all you're going to learn about them is they were really good at singing songs in Gaelic, or back when they lived in Italy, they had to do a job.
Like, you're really not going to learn anything deeply meaningful about your great-great-grandparents.
The sins of the father, which go on to the seventh generation, you won't learn where they started.
And there's part of me that wants to suggest that the horrors of industrialized warfare, not that war was ever nice.
One of the great lines from Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 is that war is a nasty business.
And maybe it always, always was just inhuman, but there is something about industrial war that is uniquely horrific.
And I think it left all of us with major spiritual damage.
On the one hand, I'm very aware of the moral atrocities that existed in the past.
But something about the moral atrocities in the present are enormous.
And fundamentally, I do believe in the progressive theory of human development.
I think there's solid evidence that we are more We have the potential at least for greater psychological advancement than our ancestors had.
But there's also so much more psychological depravity.
In the midst of plenty, we are such petty monsters to one another.
And I know how to square that circle.
My intellectual bent demands that I find a logical explanation.
Good God, 200 years ago, schoolchildren used to set cats on fire for fun.
And yet, 200 years ago, we also had some very advanced moral theologians.
Whereas today, you're hard-pressed to find a moral theologian that's celebrated by society.
I'm not sure what to make of it.
Not sure what to make of it.
Well, I guess I'll finish off with a couple of final thoughts.
Mmm.
Cotton Clothing Enjoyer says, reminds me of the Protestant loss of accountability to the Church.
No confession, no conciliar consensus, etc.
Alongside the authoritarian power grab of Rome, as it slowly liberalizes into oblivion.
Yeah, I know.
I. You nailed it.
that Protestantism turns every man into his own Pope.
And yet, the Catholic Pope is...
Oh, goodness.
I am very not interested in writing apologetics for the Pope.
Like, the Popes were pretty bad 500 years ago.
Now they're just weak and pathetic.
Davsky, Grand Inquisitor.
Please read The Grand Inquisitor.
It is such a brilliant work.
And I vibe with that so hard.
We don't have a gilded cage anymore.
I'd like to be able to condemn the Protestants, but I also have to condemn the papacy.
Like, they kind of deserve each other, don't they?
I think we're.
Welcome to Age of Aquarius.
No more astral pyramids.
Serena says, might be a shrinking of the extremes.
Everything's flatter now.
Yes, which is also the end of the astral pyramid.
So to briefly explain, you've got the four layers of existence.
There's probably more, but you've got the four basic layers that we can observe.
You've got the material.
You've got the energetic, the level of vibes.
You've got the astral, the layer of ideologies and ideas, and you've got the spiritual, which is where the gods live.
It's where numbers have existential, like they're alive on that level.
And the age of Pisces was the age of the astral pyramid, where if we can, where we're going to get everybody on board with one idea.
and we're going to coordinate society thereby, the axial age is what start off the Pisces and the astral pyramids.
And so we have all like we've got a bunch of different religions vying for dominance on the planet.
And now that it's all in late-stage Pisces, it gets more and more desperate for control.
And every ideology wants to be occult these days.
The multi-level marketing scams, which are mostly based upon religious heresies.
The what's it called?
The doctrine of a doctrine of abundance.
That's what it's called.
Prosperity gospel.
Prosperity gospel is one of the ugliest heresies out there, but it's also the foundation for most multi-level marketing scams.
Most corporations are trying to turn themselves into an astral pyramid.
Here at Corporation XYZ, we believe in these values.
Oddly absurd.
Thank God.
I tend to work in industries that require a little bit of brain and a lot of muscle.
They can be very tiring, but they don't demand that I subscribe to an astral pyramid.
They just ask me to do my job honestly and work well with my co-workers.
Oh, there's always that lecture about what company XYZ values.
Thank God they value product more than the astral pyramid.
So yes, as Serena points out, it could be that these astral pyramids, regardless of the effectiveness of the law and order protocols, was breaking on the wheel an effective crime prevention tactic?
Well, that's not the question.
The foundation is actually the astral pyramid, the guilt age that protected most people.
And yet the people it didn't protect were so far on the outside that they turned into absolute monsters.
Whereas what we're seeing with Age of Aquarius is a great democratization of psychic ability, a great democratization of good versus evil.
There's no longer the safety in the astral pyramid.
Maybe 500 years ago, if you regularly beat your kids, but you did it in the way that the priest told you was okay, the kids would turn out all right.
Whereas nowadays, it's not about whether or not you beat the kids or if you just tell them they're not worthy of love.
Maybe today it's more about the context in which you do it.
I don't know.
I don't know.
Wish I had better answers for you folks.
Things are getting weird.
Any final questions, comments, concerns?
Like, please toss them out there.
Starving Vampire says, hello!
I hope you've been listening the whole time.
I did send you a link.
He and I are working on a new track, by the way.
So right-click Starving Vampires, open a new tab.
We've done some musical projects together.
I don't presently have a saxophone because I've been employed less than I hoped.
But that's okay.
All moves according to the winds of the Great Magnet.
Serena says, I also think people are going to blow shit out.
Yeah, and I. Could I rephrase what you just said?
I think people.
I think people.
We are supposed to be developing an internal locus of control.
We are supposed to...
No, no, not internal locus of control.
Internal locus of control is at least 500 years old.
I'm the master of my fate.
I'm the captain of my ship.
Internal locus of control.
Most of this.
Most of this therapy.
Most of this, my parents gave me trauma.
Most of the feminist thing.
You know, oh, men are this way.
Or the manosphere, women are this way.
Those actually aren't about internal or external locus of control.
The foundation to all of these who do we blame for the evil conversations seems to be what set of rules should we be following.
So the whole nature of when is it appropriate to spank your child?
This rule set says you should spank them 3% of the time.
This one says you should spank them 40% of the time.
Maybe what I'm saying is that the spanking, it's not about what percentage of spanking becomes abusive.
It's the motive behind the spanking.
So, a system where you spank them 60% of the time, but you spank them fairly is not abusive.
The issue is why you're spanking them.
And the problem we're running into without astral pyramids, with all the astral pyramids dissolving, and the new demand being that each and every one of us individuate is that there is no rule system for all of us to follow.
We simultaneously have this again, Aquarian government is trying to.
It's damn near the Tower of Babel.
The difference between Aquarius and the Tower of Babel is the Tower of Babel believes that their language is the true language.
There's a channel I like quite a bit, Hyperborean Knowledge.
I think his latest video was on the runes.
And I've discussed myself, like, the danger of any divinatory system is the grammar of the divinatory system.
Every language, every programming language, every human language, every system of divination has its own grammar inherent in it.
I have been experimenting with tarot, and I am.
Well, the only way to learn grammar is to use a language, but I'm paying a lot of attention to the grammar.
The Grand Inquisitor protected the people within his totalitarian grammar, and thus he accused Christ.
Age of Aquarius, unlike the Tower of Babel, the Tower of Babel says, this is the grammar by which all shall be spoken.
Aquarius, on the other hand, says you can have any officially recognized form of grammar that you want so long as it is officially recognized.
If the Tower of Babel wanted to own all of the truth, Aquarius just wants to put all of the truth into a spreadsheet.
Aquarius is okay, for example, with having Sharia courts in the land, so long as you pre-register for Sharia.
Even though Sharia and British common law are inconsistent.
It just demands that you register.
You can use any grammar you want so long as it's a recognized grammar, which also speaks to a lot of the misdirected rebellions coming out of Pisces into Aquarius.
As Pisces died, there were rebellions against the astral pyramids.
As many correctly pointed out, the popes were incredibly hypocritical.
They were not particularly biased.
And they said, screw you, I'm going to create my own astral pyramid with hookers and gambling, etc.
But it was still an astral pyramid.
But it was a rebellious astral pyramid, which created more rebellions, more rebellions, until everybody is being their own individuated astral pyramid.
You know, I've known plenty of very radical Protestants that were holier than Jesus, as they like to say.
Like they were literally creating their own Protestant cult because they were to Protestant cult.
Because they were to anti-pyramid to be part of their anti-pyramid pyramid.
And so we've got a lot of people that don't like where things are headed, but they're each trying to be their own cult leader.
And so I guess what I'm suggesting with Age of Aquarius is not, like, the solution is not ghost dance into an ancient, like, let's reinvent the Catholic Church from 1200 AD.
Well, no, that's actually not going to work any more than the ghost dance worked for the Native Americans.
The opposite extreme is becoming your own familial cult leader.
That's also not the solution.
I think the solution is something along the lines of Age of Aquinas does not get to be the Tower of Babylon.
I think what you're seeing in Britain right now with the refusal to prosecute grooming gangs, with the aggressive prosecution of anybody with spicy memes on Facebook, that is very Tower of Babylon.
That is trying to create an Aquarian pyramid.
It's like, no, that's no Aquarius.
don't get to be a Piscean astral pyramid.
Gotta hold you to account.
I hope that makes sense.
Let me.
I think Paul also trained to blow shit out of proportion.
I like stuff that we could brush off as kids now requires therapy.
therapy.
Okay, I'm going to finish off on the Jungian argument that what we need to do is individuate.
We can no longer seek absolution through obedience, through agreeing with the majority, that we must be crucified between the contradictions within our own souls.
Actually, here's a great place to end it.
So there's a game that came out recently, Torment, the Tides of Newman Era.
I don't know if I reckon the game or not.
I recommend the game because it's creative.
It's a spiritual successor to Torment Planescape, which gave you the option of being good or evil, lawful or chaotic.
Now, in Tides of Newman Era, instead of good, evil, lawful, chaotic, you have five tides.
You got the, what are they, the purple, cyan, gold, red, and silver.
And these tides are, they're something like red is physical, silver is truth, gold is self-sacrifice, purple is deep wisdom, and something like that.
And the decisions you make build up what type of character you have.
But it's not that any one of these five is good.
Is ambition bad?
I was having a conversation on Discord with a man who got called out for pretending to be unambitious while actually being ambitious and had the self-awareness to notice that he was doing that.
and replied to him is ambition necessarily bad if i were talking to the gods and i said to them give me a sire and i will build something powerful on this land
Or allow me to sire a son and I will build something powerful on this land to your glory.
Is that an evil ambition?
I think not.
And when you deny your ambition, when you suppress your ambition, when you pretend not to be ambitious, that's when you become ambitious in the sneakiest of ways.
Evil seems to have a lot to do with suppression, with denial, with lying to yourself about what you're doing.
Where is when?
You understand Souls and Nitson that the line between good and evil runs through the heart of every man and who A part of their own heart.
When you confront the shadow and integrate the shadow, when you acknowledge the desires, the ambitions, that's when you can turn them into something positive.
Like, are any of these instincts we have in and of themselves negative?
I mean, maybe, but even if they are, even if there are these vicious parts of your own nature, then aren't we better off acknowledging them and admitting them to ourselves and engaging them so that perhaps they're not quite so destructive?
Anyway, I hope that was a good stream.
I hope you guys enjoyed it.
I appreciate all the comments.
And tomorrow morning, my video on the mystery religions of the current astrological age and what a mystery religion is goes live.
