Davis Aurini - Atheism was Never Real

June 23, 2023 - Davis Aurini

01:59:24

Atheism was Never Real

In this livestream I argue that the world is largely ruled by an ancient mystery religion - gnosticism - and one window into this is the patently false claim that Science Fiction is predominantly atheist... for atheists, a lot of them seem to have some pretty "woo" beliefs.

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Good evening, Folks, welcome to the live stream.
	This is, of course, I, your loquacious host, Leo Arini, and the lovely danger dog, who constantly needs love and attention, don't we?
	Come here.
	Come here.
	Want to sit on my lap?
	You lapdog?
	Is that what you are?
	You're a lap dog?
	So.
	So, I guess I should just jump right into it.
	In tonight's stream, if ever be holding on to your crucifix and your balls, I'm going to be arguing that we are ruled by a cabal of dark wizards.
	And this is part of an ancient war that has been going on between the forces of good and the forces of evil throughout civilization.
	And many of the major historical events that we can see.
	Well, I'm not going to get into that aspect of it, but yeah, this is nothing new.
	Also, atheists aren't real.
	Which is, I'm going to get to that shortly.
	Because I want to explain to you exactly where this completely lunatic perspective is coming from.
	And the atheism thing is a major part of it.
	Like, the idea that any of these people are actually atheists, it's ludicrous once you actually start looking at who these people are, where they came from, how they're all connected.
	But to give you a teaser of where I'm planning to go, let's talk about Danger Dog.
	I need my notes.
	I actually wrote notes for this three people.
	To give you an idea of where we're going, let's talk about the Lucius Trust.
	Lucius Trust, never heard of that.
	Well, this was brought up by James Lindsay over at New Discourses.
	One of the nice things about the current gig is I just get to sit around listening to audiobooks, interviews, live streams.
	I've just been doing a lot of data dump into my head.
	And James Lindsay brought up something.
	He brought up this Lucius Trust, which I've known about.
	I'd heard about it years back, but it was just kind of a weird dangling thread.
	I didn't have enough other points on the map to start connecting dots to the whole thing.
	And maybe you don't either.
	Okay, maybe this sounds, I'm pretty sure it sounds pretty wacky, what I'm going to be presenting.
	That were ruled by dark wizards.
	That's a little bit wacky.
	It's a little bit wacky, isn't it?
	But let's talk about the Lucius Trust.
	So the Lucius Trust was founded by Alice Bailey in 1922.
	Except it wasn't called the Lucius Trust in 1922.
	It was called Lucifer Publishing.
	Oh, now we're getting interesting.
	So Alice Bailey.
	Alice Bailey was a theosophist.
	So the theosophists were a, they're kind of one of those wacky groups.
	If you've heard about them, you know, like, they seem to have influenced the Nazis.
	Certainly their ideas spread.
	Like, the real weirdness about the Nazis, okay, was, oh, goodness.
	Like, Aryan doesn't mean Indo-European to the theosophist.
	Okay?
	The Aryan in the Theosophist mindset, in the Theosophist metaphysical worldview, is the highest form of soul.
	You've got the Lemurians who are the basic laborers, the human cattle.
	You've got the Atlanteans who are the intellectuals.
	And then you've got the Aryans who are the enlightened ones, the spiritual race of prophets.
	Okay, so Hitler was a little bit more literalist in the conception of Aryan than what's her name, Alice Bailey was.
	But it was the same conception.
	He didn't hate the Jews because he thought that they had poor genetic code.
	He didn't hate the Jews because they practiced usury and they kind of screwed over Germany during the 20s.
	No, he hated them because they were restricting the ascension, the spiritual ascension of the Germanic people into the spiritual Aryans.
	You see the difference?
	Okay, it's not that Hitler was a racist, it's that he was a Gnostic, he was a metaphysicist, he was a lunatic.
	So you might hear about the Theosophists, but no, you don't hear just wacky, crazy people that, you know, back in the 20s they had all sorts of weird beliefs.
	Well, Alice Bailey was one of them.
	She founded her company, which was Lucifer Publishing, now known as the Lucius Trust.
	And who are the Lucius Trust?
	Well, let's find out where their offices are.
	They've got three main offices.
	One in Geneva, one in London, and one in New York City.
	And the one in New York City is located at the United Nations Plaza.
	That's right.
	So this crazy mystic woman who thought she was talking to Archangel Michael and thought that because of the age of Aquarius, a new spiritual race even higher than the Aryans was going to descend upon humanity if we could get the correct sort of educational system.
	An educational system, which, as she describes it, looks exactly like social-emotional learning, looks exactly like critical race theory, an education system that's not so much about math and numbers but proper social relations.
	A woman who hung out with Margaret Sanger planned parenthood because the new souls coming into the earth, well, first of all, there's too many bodies.
	We should be planning these pregnancies.
	And second of all, man needs to assert his control over reproduction if we are to become the gods which we know we are, according to the Theosophists.
	Also apparently hung out with George Orwell.
	And that encounter inspired 1984.
	So the Lucius Trust is the primary book publisher for the United Nations.
	And in fact, if you go to the United Nations websites, all of her books of theosophy, all of these really wacky, spiritualist, the fifth race coming upon man, all this nonsense is there on the United Nations website.
	And the Lucius Trust, they have a meditation room in the United Nations, the headquarters in New York City.
	It's a room with a pyramid on its side that is 33 feet long, and I forget right now, who's that group that really likes the number 33?
	Rings a bell, but I can't recall who they are right now.
	So a pyramid on its side, 33 feet long, and they supposedly have a piece of iron ore in the middle of it that's directly tied to the Earth's magnetic field.
	Or something like that.
	So maybe the wizard idea isn't quite that wacky when the United Nations has, as their publishing house, Lucifer Publishing.
	We have people that certainly think they are wizards.
	And they are very much in influential places.
	You know, I think it was about four or five years ago that I started, that I first got onto this thread.
	For me, I started noticing little patterns in history.
	See, I was trying to understand ancient history a bit better.
	I was trying to understand Christianity better, understand the Bible better, understand contemporary political events a bit better.
	And I started finding, well, why does this cult of a bull keep coming up again and again?
	Why does the bowl always have a star with it?
	Why is the current symbol of Judaism a six-sided star when a cursory investigation says that thing didn't exist 300 years ago?
	It was not a symbol of anything in particular 300 years ago.
	You know, if you're thinking this kind of sounds like Assassin's Creed, yes, it's sort of like Assassin's Creed, except, well, if you plate the game, it starts off with a somewhat confusing message that this game was made by a diverse team with diverse views and we celebrate diversity.
	Oh wait, that makes a little bit more sense in the year 2023.
	In the year 2023, if you phone up Revenue Canada, oh, it's not frisbee time, danger dog.
	It is not frisbee time, I'm afraid.
	I can't believe it.
	We actually found a toy that she doesn't destroy in three hours.
	In the current year, if you phone Revenue Canada, the very first thing you hear on the phone is that we have a diverse workforce and no abuse will be tolerated.
	And I go, that's a really weird way to start off a first date.
	So the fact that the Assassin's Creed games start off with that statement, that we have a diverse staff.
	I don't think it's so much that they were worried that Muslims or Christians would be offended by the depictions of medieval assassins.
	Nothing is forbidden, everything is permitted.
	That is an interesting motto.
	So yes, it is something like the Assassin's Creed game, except I think those are written by people on the other team.
	And so yeah, I've been digging into this, trying to piece together bits and pieces, patterns that you see throughout history.
	And it's interesting seeing other people move in the same direction.
	You know, Anonymous Conservative discusses cabal at length and the surveillance networks that it went from something else, just a bunch of schizophrenic people thinking they're being gangstalked to more people being open to the fact that, well, yeah, that actually is.
	We know they're monitoring our cell phones, our internet usage.
	They were giving us IQ tests and in many cases, psychic tests back in the gate program.
	Which, oh, who was saying in her book, Education in the New Age?
	Yeah, Alice Bailey was saying that we should be monitoring children as part of the education process.
	Monitoring, investigating, and figuring out where to apply them.
	So you want to know where this cabal comes from?
	Possibly.
	Why is it that people would be willing to sell up their nation, sell up their neighbors to be spies on people that mean them no harm?
	What?
	Alright.
	No.
	It goes up here.
	We can play after.
	Well, buddy, you got to imitize the escaton.
	That's why.
	That is why.
	So let me check the comments.
	How many people are calling me insane so far?
	Oh, right.
	Why does the giant bull love child sacrifices?
	Great question.
	Let me explain it.
	Fundamentally, what this battle is about is two sides, both of which think they're the good guys and, to the simplest way of defining the difference between the two sides is that our side recognizes that we are not the greatest thing in creation and that creation exists outside
	of us.
	We can't dictate, for example, like yes, yes, we all might be brains and jars.
	This could be the matrix.
	But even if we are living in a matrix, we are not capable of defining good however we want.
	Like, yes, man has developed multiple different types of marriages.
	Sometimes it's till death do you part.
	Sometimes it's temporary.
	Sometimes it's one man with many women.
	Sometimes it's one man, one woman.
	But we've all developed institutions surrounding reproduction.
	And there's no society, no successful one anyway, that celebrates infidelity.
	They might tolerate it, but none celebrate infidelity as the greatest virtue.
	There aren't societies that celebrate cowardice and treachery and betrayal.
	Man does not get to decide what good is.
	We don't get to decide what math is.
	The good, the true, and the beautiful are things higher than ourselves.
	And our lot is to humble ourselves in front of them and try and understand this universe, try and grok what is going on and devote ourselves to the good, the true, and the beautiful.
	The other side is solipsistic.
	The other side does not believe reality actually exists.
	They believe that the highest order of being is man, and that reality is created by man.
	We manufacture reality.
	So not that we're brains in jars or that we're programs in the matrix.
	We are brains that manufacture our own jar.
	The jar is our manufacturing.
	And the state of bliss, Eden, is not a thing in our past.
	Eden is a potentiality that we can manifest if we as a species all align to manufacture the reality we choose for ourselves.
	Thus the Assassin's Creed saying, nothing is forbidden, everything is permitted.
	So why do they like sacrificing babies?
	The simple answer is that it's an assertion of will.
	Because if reality is created by us, by our imagining, then good and evil are also created by our imagining.
	And so to choose to sacrifice a baby in such a manner is to assert that you are higher than the good.
	You make up your own good.
	The difference between these two, it's solipsism and philosophia.
	Solipsism.
	Actually, no, let's start with philosophia.
	Philosophia is loving wisdom.
	Loving wisdom and pursuing wisdom.
	Solipsism is owning Sophia.
	It's owning wisdom.
	It's having wisdom.
	Our side loves the good, the true, and the beautiful.
	Our side loves wisdom.
	But, as the oracle said, I am the wisest of all the Greeks, for I alone know that I know nothing.
	Socrates pursued wisdom.
	He didn't claim to have it.
	The solipsist claims to have it.
	There's a tripartite breakdown of knowledge.
	Of we'll keep knowledge for now.
	If I were writing a tome, I might select a different word there, but faith, reason, and noesis.
	Which, by the way, this is where James Lindsay would deeply disagree with me.
	He did a fantastic job defining these terms.
	So knowledge is that which we ascertain about the world around us.
	Right?
	It's scientific knowledge, it's mathematical knowledge, it's facts, figures, etc.
	You know what I mean.
	Faith, on the other hand, is not knowledge.
	Faith is trust.
	Faith is, faith is I am going to continue to do the right thing, even though I see people doing the wrong thing, getting ahead in life and getting away with it.
	I see other people cheating.
	I'm not going to cheat.
	I'm going to have faith and trust that God wins in the end.
	And the third one, noesis or gnosis.
	Now it was Tree of Woe that coined the term gnisis.
	And the other side abuses this.
	They have gnosis.
	Gnosis is hidden knowledge.
	It's occult knowledge.
	It's knowledge which comes before reason.
	The Gnostic faith is faith in themselves.
	Not faith in God.
	Not faith in doing the right thing.
	It's faith in the inevitability that man will succeed.
	Because to the Gnostic, man is God.
	The end result, the end state of man, the last man, the new communist man, that is God.
	When man finally achieves his highest capacity, he recreates reality in his own image.
	That is God to the Gnostics.
	And that knowledge that it's inevitable that communism will win, that is their Gnostic knowledge, that fact.
	Whereas for us, noesis, I think I said Tree of Woe coined the term.
	He wrote a fantastic article and summed up something that had been bothering me for quite some time.
	Because noesis seems to be a rare perceptual ability.
	Noesis is direct apprehension of the good, the true, and the beautiful.
	Now it doesn't mean you don't have to work for it.
	I'll give you an example of noesis.
	It's when I'm working on a car.
	When I'm working, a car's not starting.
	There's a million reasons it might not be starting.
	And I start off, I do the basic diagnostic tests.
	Does it have gas?
	Does it have spark?
	Does it have, are the lines connected?
	Is the starter working?
	Etc.
	You do the basic diagnostics to limit the idea space.
	But at some point, and Eliezer Yutkowski wrote about this.
	He called it Einstein's Arrogance, I think was the name of the article.
	In the article he described how Einstein was, they were doing an experiment to test relativity.
	I think the experiment was, you know, satellite going around the Earth.
	Is the stopwatch on it going to show, is it going to be slower than the stopwatch on Earth?
	Right?
	Because it's moving fast, time slows down.
	And a journalist asked Einstein what he would do if the experiment proved relativity wrong.
	And Einstein responded, well, if the experiment proves relativity wrong, then the experiment made a mistake.
	And so Einstein's arrogance, the arrogance of a scientist saying that if the experiment disproves my theory, the experiment is wrong.
	Yukowski pointed out that, and he was talking about direct apprehension of the good, the true, and the beautiful, even though the guy thinks he's an atheist.
	When you stumble, when your brain lights up with the correct idea, whether it's Einstein struggling with physics and struggling with it, and then out of all potential idea space, one of them lights up in his head, like a bolt out of the blue.
	You're working on your car and you can't figure it out, and then boom, you know exactly why it's not working.
	And you can skip about an hour's worth of diagnostics and testing just to fix that thing.
	That's noesis.
	Now the difference between Gnostic and Noesis is that you only get the noesis which you deserve.
	And let me expand.
	The noesis you get, you don't get to spy on other people with noesis.
	It's none of your damned business.
	The Gnostic knowledge, they would say that you can.
	See, you can scry on other people, you can read their souls, you can divine their destiny.
	You've got no right to that information.
	It's none of your business.
	You can gain noesis about yourself, about your bloodline, about things that you have a right to know.
	Those are available to you.
	Another thing is you can't get noesis.
	You can't figure out relativity if you don't devote a lot of time to studying physics.
	You can't figure out why your car won't work without being pretty good at mechanics.
	You need to earn it.
	Divinity doesn't grant you this knowledge willy-nilly.
	It's what has been earned and what is just for you to have.
	You're entrusted with this knowledge because it makes the world a better place.
	And once you have this knowledge, you also don't get to be reckless with it.
	You still have to do the proper safety testing.
	You still have to obey the rules of reason, and it has to accord with faith.
	So three of them, noesis, faith, and reason, there's a Chinese wall between the three of them.
	Right?
	And the correct approach to reality, we have knowledge of the physical world.
	We have faith about God, and we have noesis about what we know to be true.
	But we build a Chinese wall between them because each one needs to maintain integrity.
	We keep the Chinese wall because if there's a disagreement between any of the three, those are the three aspects of knowing.
	If there's a disagreement, one of them is wrong.
	The Gnostics, on the other hand, smash the walls.
	And the only way of knowing that it's wrong is, well, real communism has never been dropped.
	Because if it didn't work, if it didn't create the perpetual paradise, it wasn't real communism by definition.
	So we'll just try again, throw another million people into the blender.
	Not supposed to be talking about atheism, aren't I?
	Let me just check the comments.
	Oh, geez.
	Oh, it was doing that stupid echo thing again.
	I'm sorry about that.
	Normally I re-upload the streams to my Patreon, but this one's pretty organized, and I really have something to say, so I'm going to be putting this one up on the Odyssey channel.
	If it cuts out, if there's any other issues like that, I did see my internet cutting out.
	Ever since I got the new router, the internet is terrible.
	There shouldn't be any issues on the upload, because it's being recorded locally on my phone.
	internet ain't got nothing to do with it.
	Let's see.
	Yeah, we're caught up with the comments.
	And I'm supposed to be talking about science fiction and atheism.
	But atheism is fake.
	Because that is what really struck me today.
	I know.
	Here I am listening to Blavatsky with her theosophism and what's her name?
	Alice Bailey in the United Nations.
	And so, of course, I start thinking about science fiction.
	Yeah, I've said in the past that one of the greatest tricks they pulled was convincing us that alchemy was really just boring chemistry.
	Yeah, I've seen a lot of discussions.
	There was, oh, shoot, I can't remember the blogger.
	But there's a really good discussion about how they're destroying Canada with opioids, cannabis, and yet they're banning tobacco.
	Apparently they're even, they're not going to be printing warning labels on each individual cigarette.
	Even though the Canadian government, there they go, in Vancouver they're handing out opioids for free to people because it's safe opioids that won't result in an OD.
	And people are selling those opioids to school kids.
	14-year-old girl just OD'd in Vancouver on government-supplied opiates.
	Don't smoke those cigarettes, though.
	And a lot of people are starting to notice, hey, if this was about, hey, now, are you really concerned about protecting people?
	Seems like something else is going on.
	Alright, because it is alchemy.
	It is magic.
	These are spells being cast upon the population.
	But surely not.
	Surely not.
	For don't we all live in this modern era of science and progress, of reason, where we abandon superstition and we build spaceships to explore the stars?
	It's crazy, man.
	Like we all think we live in this world.
	And yet, like, where did this world come from?
	Where's this conception, this modernist science fiction?
	Like, they will tell you that science fiction, like, it was, when was it invented?
	It was 80,000 leagues under the seas.
	It was, it was, um, oh, oh, goodness, the Martian invasion, where the, the, it's the microbes that kill the Martians.
	They tell you that science fiction didn't exist until, you know, like, 1880s.
	1870s, maybe.
	And yeah, I was listening to an interview with a really interesting historian.
	It might have been on the Lore Lodge channel.
	That's an interesting channel on YouTube, The Lore Lodge.
	It does, like, Bigfoot, ancient history, Atlantis, and he's a fellow historian.
	Okay, so he's skeptical, but willing to entertain interesting ideas.
	Might have been on that channel, where he was talking to a, I think that, well, the guy, he's a historian mythicist, and he's been collecting, he's assembled myths from all sorts of cultures, where the myths involve technological devices.
	Now, not to say that aliens visited us.
	Okay, that's not what he's doing.
	It's like a mechanical horse that flies through the air.
	And the man has to, like, the man in the story is trying to get stuff from all over the world to keep his wife happy.
	And these are pretty early.
	These are like a thousand years ago, two, three thousand years ago.
	We see a lot of these myths involving mechanical wonders.
	They're clearly not referencing UFOs, okay?
	It's not a UFO.
	It's not an alien visitor.
	It's really just a story.
	The same way, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, they have an elevator that goes up to the moon somehow.
	Like, that's, it's more like that.
	And yet it is kind of science fiction, isn't it?
	It's not hard science fiction, but it's science fiction.
	So actually, yeah, we've had science fiction much, much longer than since the invention of the science fiction.
	No, no, we've had it for millennia.
	Yeah, it's a little bit more detailed now.
	But science fiction is nothing new.
	So what is the science fiction phenomenon, and is it actually atheistic?
	Because obviously, when I say that atheism doesn't exist, I am not saying that, you know, my favorite chemist in the world, I'm sure he thinks he's an atheist.
	And I'm sure he thinks that science and faith are opposed to one another.
	I mean, like, that's another wonderful trick that has been played on everybody.
	That science and faith, that reason and faith are enemies.
	Way to get, way to split your opponents into two different teams.
	Right?
	Like, get the faith people and the reason people fighting with one another when all of them are on the Noesa side.
	Meanwhile, the people on the Gnosticism side are just laughing their ass off at us.
	Again, the Noesa side says that we have faith that reality is not going to mess with us.
	That God is going to be fair.
	He's not going to bend the rules.
	And so we can develop something like reason in science.
	We can trust reason because we can trust God.
	That's faith.
	and that once in a while God gives us a bolt from the blue that allows us way more insight than we should have, and society advances by leaps and bounds.
	The other side believes that God is the last man.
	The last man which they are working on creating.
	And the last man can't exist until all men agree.
	And so they have blind faith in this gnosis, and they're going to use reason by any mechanism necessary to achieve this end.
	Imagine a boot smash stomping on a face for all eternity.
	That actually would be their heaven.
	And if you could get one of the bastards to be honest, they would actually be okay with it.
	It sounds kind of fun.
	Forcing everybody to wake up to the same mad dream that they have.
	So, again, getting off topic here.
	It's a good ramble.
	I want to talk about whether or not science fiction is actually atheistic.
	Because this is the presumption of science fiction, isn't it?
	That science fiction, unlike fantasy, science fiction is telling science stories.
	It's telling reason stories that they're...
	Some of the more mature science fiction might have a place for priests, even speculation about God.
	But in general, science fiction is very atheistic.
	I'm going to dispute that claim as soon as I get some more ice for my drink.
	So first, a caveat.
	Is that there are actual atheist science fiction writers, such as Heinlein, Robert Heinlein.
	Robert Heinlein is a man that came to his atheism from a very genuine place.
	He was a Dawkins atheist.
	If you sat him down and asked him, he'd say, he'd probably say something like, like Dawkins said.
	I think Dawkins said he's 90% certain God doesn't exist.
	Not 100%.
	90%.
	And Heinlein's the same way.
	And like a good, honest atheist like that, I got respect for them.
	So Robert Heinlein actually wrote one book that he wrote a fantasy book, but he spurked out with his atheistic autism.
	And so it's like people had flying carpets, but you had to make sure you didn't fly over any churches because the hallowed ground would prevent your black magic from working.
	So he developed this whole system of how the magic would work in an industrial society.
	So he reinvented industrialism with magic.
	It's kind of funny.
	Kind of funny.
	You can tell that he's an honest atheist who's open to the idea.
	If you read, oh, whatchamacallit?
	The man from Mars.
	If you read that, he's open to the idea.
	He's open to the idea.
	He's not an angry atheist.
	He's an honest atheist.
	And certainly you've got Philip K. Dick, who is outright Christian.
	One of his books, they literally blow up an alien planet by performing an exorcism.
	Because the aliens aren't real, they're just demons.
	Philip K. Dick knew what was going on, man.
	He knew what was going on.
	He knew about the surveillance, too, by the way.
	Now, I want to talk about the.
	Let's start.
	Let us start.
	Oh, yeah, I'm still streaming.
	Let's start with Star Trek.
	Because Star Trek is the most atheistic.
	It's what they call it.
	Secular humanism.
	Okay, it's secular humanism the TV show.
	It really presupposes an atheistic universe.
	Or does it?
	I'm going to give you three examples of why Star Trek is not really atheistic at the end of the day.
	It's a religion calling itself science.
	It's got science written on the package, but it's religion inside of the can.
	The first example is psychic ability.
	Why the heck was Gene Roddenberry so excited or so desiring to emphasize psychic ability when psychic ability, especially these days, is something I put on the woo side of things.
	The religious side of things.
	The metaphysical, the magic side of things.
	Give me one sec, folks.
	And Gene Rodberry included it.
	I can't read Hanson.
	I'm sorry.
	See, the human potential movement was something that came out of the the whole hippie thing.
	Oh, where did the hippie thing come from?
	So, number one is the whole psychic ability thing.
	Again, it's not like there's not like you have an Elon Musk chip installed in your head and you can instant message with other people on the Enterprise.
	No, it's like Troy has psychic ability for some damn reason.
	Number two: Wesley Crusher and the space pedophile.
	When the Enterprise gets the limits of the universe, they get to a place where thought itself is the matter which creates reality.
	Uh-huh.
	Thought itself.
	Well, whose thoughts?
	Gods?
	Well, God ain't here, man.
	No, the crew of the Enterprise, their thoughts start creating reality.
	There is no God-observer to make reality certain, to make it trustworthy.
	There's just man and Wesley Crusher, the last man who flies off the space pedophile to create his own reality.
	That's not science fiction.
	Sorry, that's not modernist, rational, non-spiritual science fiction.
	That's mysticism.
	Which isn't to say that it's incorrect, it's just it's not modernist.
	It's not what it says on the package.
	And the third thing with Star Trek is, especially with the original series, how often did Gene introduce a superbeing that said it was God and was a petty little tyrant, and then they found out, oh, you're not a god, you're a energy being, you're whatever it is.
	Futurama did a fantastic riff on this, where they flew away from the energy being's planet.
	They're like, all this time we thought he was a god, but he was only a small child playing with toys.
	And then the wife shows up, he's not a child, he's 35 years old.
	Now where, what does that remind you of?
	Gene Roddenberry's, his love of spitting in Zeus' face, that is the god that stole fire from Hephaestus.
	That is the Lucifer story.
	Again, there are two basic religious orientations.
	The first, where we recognize we are small beings in this creation.
	We can't create good arbitrarily.
	We do have something like creative ability.
	We have something like God inside of us that we can write stories.
	We can craft recipes.
	We can take food and we can make a cake out of it.
	We've got a little bit of that magic inside of us.
	But not as much magic as God, where we could define what is good and true and beautiful.
	We don't have that much.
	We've got more than the animals.
	But there's something bigger than us.
	We don't have that.
	Then you've got the Lightbringer.
	You've got the one that brings fire from Hephaestus' forge and gives it to man.
	Who gives man the power of the gods.
	And it turns out that the gods themselves are corrupt and petty tyrants.
	That Yahweh is just a sadist.
	And that it wasn't eating the fruit and gaining knowledge of good and evil that condemned us to suffering.
	No, no, that was just Yahweh's stupid petty game.
	It was the division of labor, the power of man over man, which created suffering.
	Lucifer is our friend.
	Those are the two takes.
	Serving or asserting.
	Recognizing that we aren't the light or saying that we've been gifted the light by the light bringer.
	And so the reason that you see Gene Roddenberry constantly taking Zeus down a peg.
	Well, he couldn't rightly take Yahweh down a peg.
	That's a little too on the nose.
	But if these kids see that Zeus was a petty and arbitrary god, maybe they'll pick up on what the other one is as well.
	Atheism truly is fake and gay.
	That's the thing.
	Gene Roddenberry was not an atheist.
	Between the psychic ability, the universe is run unthought, and look at this god.
	He's not a real god.
	He's a demiurge.
	Those are not the writings of an atheist.
	An atheist writer would be Robert Heinlein, who occasionally touched upon, maybe there is something mystical.
	don't know how it works.
	That's how a human atheist writes.
	That's how a human writes.
	And by the way, atheists like that are not our enemies.
	An atheist that can admit, you know, there might be something bigger than me.
	All I can do is use signs to build a spacesuit.
	Have spacesuit.
	We'll travel.
	That guy's on our side.
	Even if he does occasionally go down some pretty stupid things.
	Gene Roddenberry was not an atheist.
	Humanism is not atheism.
	Humanism is an attempt to steal fire from the gods.
	Humanism is the belief that Lucifer is our friend.
	And the UN will thoroughly support this.
	Alright, so Star Trek.
	Star Trek is not atheist.
	Star Trek is anti-Yahweh.
	It's anti-Zeus.
	It's pro-Gnostic.
	So there's one of them.
	Well, let's think of another sci-fi grade.
	Let's talk about Asimov.
	Most of Asimov's right.
	By the way, I love Asimov's writings, okay?
	Like, was the guy a pederast?
	I look at the noisiest quiet person ever.
	Drive safe.
	Oh, wait.
	I gotta give Danger Dog a thug.
	Have fun against God.
	I will miss you, sorry folks, bad timing tonight.
	I think you just got rescheduled.
	And I gotta close that door.
	the light drives me nuts.
	Now, first, I'm going to bring up Asimov's book, Childhood's End.
	Childhood's End is a book where these aliens show up and decide to help humanity.
	And for several generations, they help humanity.
	And then they finally reveal what they look like to us.
	And they look like devils.
	Which is why they kept their appearance secret for so long.
	They didn't want to scare humanity.
	And it turns out that humanity had some latent psychic ability.
	Oh, there's that psychic ability again.
	Very scientific, very modernist, very mathematical and rigorous.
	That we sensed that the arrival of these others would represent the childhood's end, our end as humans had been.
	And what these aliens tell us is that every sapient race in the galaxy eventually achieves a higher level of being.
	They have a flaw where they can't achieve that.
	So they serve the great galactic mind by helping species that are about to achieve ultra-sapience in their final decades.
	And so that's why they came to Earth and gave us advanced technology to ease us into the fact that there's going to be a generation born, the indigo children maybe, that stop being regular human and become some sort of very weird collective mind.
	And at the end of the book, they take all of the last humans off the planet, and the new humans, the Homo Deus, to quote Ferrari of the United Nations, they start doing this really weird dance all over the planet and then become a mega-mind.
	Okay, cool, but that's not about spaceships and traveling faster than light and etc.
	It's got the patina of science fiction on it.
	It's got the patina of science and modernism and atheism on it, but that's not an atheist story.
	That's a faith-based story.
	Oh, and remind me, who else said that man is a species creature?
	Man is not an individual creature.
	Man is a species creature.
	And until all of the species embrace this method of thought, the utopia will not arrive.
	Marx said that.
	Marx said we are a species creature.
	This is why critical theory and social-emotional learning and radical leftism, and neoconservatism are focused on convincing everybody to agree with them.
	Right?
	Whether we're spreading democracy in the Middle East, or if we're teaching everybody to become an activist, as opposed to learn, you know, reading, writing, arithmetic, is because man is a species being.
	If we can convince everybody to love Big Brother, the paradise will manifest.
	The Luciferian aliens show up to induct us into becoming our higher self, which is a giant group mind.
	Asimov was not an atheist.
	He was just anti-Zeus, anti-Diespater, anti-Jupiter, anti-Dais.
	Pater Noster, anti-God.
	was a Gnostic, not an atheist.
	And then, well, let's Asimov and Kubrick.
	2001, A Space Odyssey.
	2001 was a movie commissioned by the United States government.
	The reason for commissioning this film was to introduce Americans to the space age to psychologically prepare them for the fact that we might meet aliens out there.
	Because the fear was, you heard about this fear.
	You heard about this.
	I heard about this.
	that, oh no, we meet aliens and all the religious people start doing crazy stuff.
	That's what it says on the package.
	Do you trust what it says on the package?
	No, we better indoctrinate Americans into understanding that there might be aliens out there.
	What would the aliens be like?
	And then those chumps hired Kubrick.
	Kubrick is our guy.
	Kubrick is 100% our guy.
	I'm not saying is he kind of like a pussy intellectual art fag liberal?
	Yeah, he is all of those things, but he's our guy.
	The Jungianism in his movies.
	Jungian, Young Young is all about noesis.
	And again, when you're messing with direct apprehension of the good, the true, and the beautiful, it's very easy to be wrong about it.
	It's very easy that it's not an angel talking to you, it's a demon.
	Which is why you don't use your noesis and follow it blindly against faith and reason.
	Okay?
	And some people argue that Jung went a little bit too far with noesis.
	Maybe he did.
	I can't judge.
	I haven't read enough to come up with a clear assessment on Jung.
	But he was sure as hell right about the shadow self.
	Which, by the way, This is a side effect of when the Gnostics were pretending to be atheists.
	And they were pushing atheism.
	They were pushing reason and saying it was opposed to faith.
	Right?
	We go back to childhood's end.
	So the faith created stupid religious people.
	And the aliens had to show up to teach us to be reason and science.
	And not to be suspicious of a group of aliens that wind our kids and look like devils.
	All the stupid faith people would be scared by that.
	So they had to spend three generations indoctrinating us in reason to the exclusion of faith so that our children could join the giant hive mind.
	This is, you know, one of the things implied by the shadow self.
	What you deny is what controls you.
	If you completely deny your shadow, your shadow will completely control you.
	And the shadow, given that the shadow is the place you cannot look, which, oh, there's aspects of Dune right there.
	Only the Kwisak Haderach can look into the place where no one can look.
	That's noesis.
	That is seeing the thing you can't see.
	The thing implied.
	If you look at Full Metal Jacket, Full Metal Jacket has this underlayer to it where America holds itself up as the shining city on the hill.
	And they export war, pornography, and simplistic garbage culture.
	Right?
	Like the last scene where the soldiers are walking after the battle, whistling the Mickey Mouse tune, the Mickey Mouse Club tune.
	Because that's American culture.
	It holds itself up to these high ideals, but is completely blind to its shadow.
	Which is...
	Like, I'm not here to shit on America.
	That's not my goal.
	Because, again, you can false dichotomy this.
	The people that shit on America.
	Oh, America's a consumer society.
	Oh, yeah?
	While you're drinking a Starbucks and playing on your iPhone, it's a consumer society, is it?
	Shadow self goes both ways there.
	It's the faith and reason split.
	Half the idiots, and I was one of these idiots, only believe in science and not faith.
	And the other half believe in faith, but not science.
	Sorry.
	A little bit off track, but you know, not that off track.
	We're talking about 2001 A Space Odyssey.
	Kubrick was our guy.
	And so he got hired to make a propaganda film.
	And so he made a film about government propaganda.
	And, you know, I'm going to...
	Rob Ager, look him up on YouTube.
	Rob Ager, A-G-E-R, has some fantastic analyses of 2001 A Space Odyssey, which was designed to replace religion.
	Because once again, 2001 was not, it's not a science story.
	2001 has two major aspects.
	It's got how the computer is going crazy.
	Artificial intelligence can't be trusted.
	Is what Kubrick is saying.
	Hal, it's one letter after IBM.
	They've been working on AI for a very long time.
	Okay, I know ChatGPT is all over the place.
	It's not new.
	It's not new.
	They've been working on AI for a long time.
	So that's one aspect is Hal.
	That's Kubrick saying these maniacs think they're automated spreadsheets.
	That's all AI is, an automated spreadsheet.
	They think their IQ tests and personality matrices and all of that is sufficient to control humanity.
	This is what happens if you actually let it run rampant.
	It goes psychotic because it's not a person.
	It doesn't have noesis.
	The other half of the story is man ascending to a higher plane.
	That's the literal narrative of the movie.
	The monolith turns, oh goodness, what's his name?
	He has a.
	He has a significant name.
	It's like his name is like Everyman or something like that.
	It's anyway, it turns him into the Starchild.
	It uplifts him into the Starchild.
	But the movie's subtext is that he becomes aware that he's in the movie and it's a propaganda movie.
	And he gains the ability to see through the propaganda.
	Which is Kubrick saying, hey, audience, see through the propaganda.
	Bathroom break.
	So 2001, it's an interesting creature because it's an anti-propaganda movie and also a propaganda movie.
	But it's just it's so interesting that the script that was approved.
	Now Kubrick did a lot to take that script, to take the he promised them this and gave them that.
	But the major elements of the movie involve man-transcending metaphysical reality.
	So this movie that is anti-religion, it's like, oh, your gods, your Zeus, your Jesus, your Buddha, then get effed.
	It's a big black cube.
	Sorry, not a black cube.
	That would be Saturn.
	It's a big black monolith that's actually the, and it's not a god.
	Man is his own god.
	What did Lucifer say in the devil's advocate?
	I am man's greatest advocate.
	I am a fan of man.
	Science fiction, atheism, they were never atheistic.
	They were Gnostic.
	Atheism is when you say, I don't know how the universe works, but I think you religious people are a bit silly.
	And I don't buy into your rituals, but I'll listen to you, and if you make a good argument about ethics, I'll go with it.
	That's atheism.
	Humanism is about dethroning the demiurge, which calls itself Zeus or Yahweh, and replacing it with man, the final man, the last man.
	What a great trick they pulled on us, thinking that science fiction was atheistic.
	Turner Hoot, thank you for the lemon.
	Ahmadi, it's been too long.
	glad to have you here yeah I'm gonna go on a little bit of a tangent It's a little bit of a tangent.
	So one of the things I've been listening to is Plato's Republic.
	And what really struck me about it is how Nihil Novi Suxole.
	Nothing new under the sun.
	So there's two particular sections that, and I'm ashamed to say I've never actually, I hadn't read it before.
	I'd read sections before this.
	I hadn't listened to the whole thing.
	And one of these sections, so in the Republic, Plato is talking about designing the perfect city.
	As part of his investigation as to what justice is.
	It doesn't matter.
	What matters is, he's talking like, well, we'll need farmers, and we'll need tailors.
	And surely it's better for a man to specialize in one trade and become an expert at it than to be a dilettante in multiple trades.
	And I heard that, but wait a minute, wait a minute.
	I thought Adam Smith said that.
	I thought that was capitalism.
	I thought it wasn't until the Industrial Revolution that we developed economic specialization.
	Isn't that how you learned it?
	that the Industrial Revolution caused Marxism and capitalist theories to develop.
	Plato recites the basic principles of free market capitalism.
	And in the dialogue, his conversation partner goes, well, of course, it's obvious.
	Yeah, like obviously we specialize in one trade because no man is sufficient, has sufficient knowledge.
	Like we all depend upon one another in an economic web.
	The traditional teaching is that we didn't discover economics until the Industrial Revolution.
	People in the past were stupid.
	the other one that kind of jumped out at me is they're debating whether or not like women should be educated should women perform should women be taught sports and perform nude with the men I'm like, good lord, this is the whole transgender debate, isn't it?
	It's...
	Should transgender women play in women's sport?
	It is that debate.
	It's that exact same debate.
	It's that men and women are dissimilar, but very similar.
	And the eternal social policy debate, how do we deal with the fact that men and women are almost the same, but not quite.
	And we think this is a modern conversation.
	Like listening to it, I'm just really left with this impression that, like, somebody told us.
	Somebody told us.
	It was in our drinking water that humanity became new.
	We became scientific.
	We're about to imitize the eschaton.
	We're going to boldly go where no man has gone before and ascend to starchild status.
	We're not like the people in previous eras.
	And yet, I think if Socrates showed up today, I'd have to, like, show him how to get the engine started and what gasoline is.
	He could do my job easily.
	He'd be like, wow, this is a really big city.
	He'd ask some questions, but he'd fit right in.
	We're not that different.
	My reason for pointing this out is that the purpose of science fiction, again, I said, we've always had science fiction.
	Yeah, it's a little bit more science-y right now, but we've always had science fiction.
	But we think science fiction is new.
	That's because the Gnostic wizards have made major advancements over the past couple hundred years.
	You know, right now I'm putting together a...
	I'm trying to put together a summation of the aeons.
	A 12,000-year history.
	It's something I could maybe expand into a book, but it's going to be a very, very long article.
	I'm mostly writing it to sort out my own framework and understanding.
	That's my reason for writing is that I want to understand things better.
	The reason that you teach something is so that you understand it better.
	That's my motivation.
	But I'm writing this thing out.
	And one of the things that struck me, there's a channel called The Histocrat, who I've been relying as the guy that points me where to go.
	Histocrat is a very cool channel.
	He probably thinks he's an atheist.
	One of these extremely skeptical, materialistic, rational type of dudes.
	He's sort of like the chemist, but not a total dipshit.
	You probably think I was like wacky and weird and crazy, but he does really solid work.
	So check out The Histocrat if you like long, boring history lectures like I do.
	And he pointed out that the development of agriculture seemed to align with the invention of slavery.
	And that their agriculture, as we understand it, may not have existed without slavery.
	And the irony of these critical race theorists, these Gnostics, as much as they decry slavery, theirs is the methodology of slavery.
	And so I'm looking at this.
	It seems to me that about, oh, geez, when would that be?
	6,000 BC or so?
	I don't have the numbers in front of me, but it seems to me that the Wizards had a major victory about 6,000 years ago when they invented the slave states.
	And so, 4,000 BC, 2000 BC, well, no, no, Bronze Age collapse.
	That was 1200.
	Yeah, right up until the Bronze Age collapse.
	It seems like the wizards were in power.
	Those that enslave humanity to a common purpose that they achieved through Gnosis, which is knowledge from the demons.
	And that following the Bronze Age collapse, during the Age of Aries, and then the Age of Pisces, Age of Aries, like, hey, the Romans did not meet our current moral standards.
	But they had a rete.
	They had excellence.
	They had moral excellence.
	Even if they were far more cruel than they ought to have been.
	And then birth of Christ.
	Major, major victory against the wizards.
	And now with the age of Aquarius dawning, the wizards are making a major effort.
	And the crazy thing is that the wizards are the ones pushing this atheism.
	When they're not atheists, they're so clearly not atheists.
	Is the point I'm trying to get across with the stream?
	It's like the whole conception of atheism.
	I should maybe say humanism.
	Humanism plus.
	Humanity plus.
	It's not actually atheism.
	It's not rationalism.
	It's wizardry.
	It's turning man into his own god.
	And I guess, like, that's what I'm trying to communicate with this stream.
	Maddie, who showed up late, so she didn't hear what I said earlier, says, I'll take straight-up atheism over churches that mislead people about God's acceptance of homosexuality.
	I mean, okay, I'm gonna... I'm not gonna disagree with you.
	There's a difference between promotion of sin versus acceptance of sin.
	So our side, our side acknowledges the good, the true, and the beautiful.
	And we aspire to it, but let me rewind for a second.
	James Lindsay did a fantastic job summing up what is Christianity.
	What is it?
	And they boil it down to two big things.
	Repentance and forgiveness.
	Number one.
	That we all need to repent.
	We all need to get back onto the right path.
	And we need to forgive one another.
	Because there ain't nobody that's holy.
	And number two, which is the societal version of this, is that don't try for perfection because you ain't going to achieve it.
	There is no utopia.
	This is the world.
	And it's beautiful and it's wonderful and it's mysterious and complex.
	But it ain't perfect.
	And you are what you are.
	You are who you are.
	Does essence precede existence or does existence precede essence?
	Which comes first?
	And the Gnostic, the Gnostic belief, with man as his own God, says that existence precedes essence.
	That man chooses his essence.
	Our side says that essence precedes existence.
	What does that mean?
	So essence, in the small form.
	In the small form.
	You have a genetic makeup that you were born with.
	You were born to these parents.
	You were born in this country.
	You were born with these genes, etc.
	Now, you can maximize those genes.
	Let's be clear here.
	I'm like, James Lindsay equates all mysticism with Gnosticism.
	And he is wrong in doing that.
	Although he's got the right target.
	He is wrong.
	No, mysticism is real.
	The fundamental nature of reality is meaning.
	Meaning and suffering are the two foundational elements of reality.
	Light side and dark side.
	Dark side, it's faster, easier, but it's not more powerful.
	Meaning and suffering are the constituent elements of reality.
	It's not yin and yang, by the way.
	It's not yin and yang.
	It's not balance.
	Yin and yang, night and day, solar lunar, black and white.
	Meaning and suffering are not opposites.
	They're not a cyclic thing.
	They are completely dissimilar in nature.
	And so, yeah, on the simple level, you are born with this nature that your parents taught you this language.
	They installed these neuroses in your head.
	You've got your nature that you're born with.
	Your existence, you don't get to, you get to influence a lot over that.
	Good lord, you can affect your health.
	You are capable of performing things that the quote-unquote atheist people, who aren't atheist, would call miracles.
	Easily, easy.
	Like, there are so many miraculous things you can do that, like, that you're allowed to do, that you should do.
	And at the same time, all men are flawed.
	So...
	So I'm going to slightly disagree with you, Matty.
	Homosexuality is a flaw.
	It is less than perfect, but we're not going to be perfect.
	Should not be celebrated.
	Pride certainly shouldn't be celebrated.
	Like, we're all just chickens down here.
	See, the other side, the other side demands their flaws be virtues.
	Because God is man.
	the final man and so the great sin of man today according to them is to participate in what the demiurge dictates And you can't blame a man for being born in a capitalist country.
	Again.
	And the accuser loves to call us hypocrites constantly.
	Point out all our shortcomings, which, oh yeah, good lord, we've got shortcomings.
	That's the point.
	Do you acknowledge the good, the true, and the beautiful?
	Do you humble yourself before it?
	And do you try and do your best?
	That is our side.
	So don't, don't allow, because, just because we assert the good and true and beautiful doesn't mean that we aren't all men with feet of clay and hypocrites and trying our best, but not very good.
	Doesn't mean that.
	Don't let them push us into, well, into well Nazism.
	You know, given Blavatsky's major influence with the whole Aryan ideal of the Nazis, it makes more and more sense to me why we keep hearing about the Nazis.
	It's the bigotry of small differences.
	The biggest difference between the UNWEF and the Nazis is the UNWEF really doesn't like German people.
	That's the biggest difference.
	Nazis are also transhumanists.
	They're also metaphysically transhumanist, I should say.
	Like, what is transhumanism?
	Is transhumanism installing a cyborg enhancement?
	Because if that's all it is, then my stepfather is a cyborg transhumanist.
	He's got an artificial hip.
	And hell, you know, I've been thinking, like, I'm turning 42 this year.
	I've been wanting to get a magnet installed in one of my fingers so that I can detect electrical current with my senses.
	And I might actually look into that.
	It's not really any different than wearing contact lenses as I am right now.
	It's not a rejection of God.
	It's using technology to enhance our abilities.
	Then you get the transhumanism, which is all about smashing the patriarchy and instantiating the eschaton.
	Currently, by the way, this is new.
	Okay, this is a new thing.
	I'm kind of ashamed that I know what it is.
	The current highest level of being is being a trans man, a female-to-male transsexual who dresses in drag and likes being misgendered.
	That is smashing the patriarchy.
	You're welcome.
	i'm sorry all you karens got left behind what was the worst use of christian iconography the rainbow lgbtq or the nazi swastika Imagine that was really interesting right now.
	This is something that's bothered me a lot.
	So when I was studying history at McMaster, I was initially, of course, everybody's fascinated about the Nazis, World War II, the Nazis, World War II, History Channel.
	Then I had a TA.
	I wrote an essay, and the TA said, okay, I'm giving you a passing mark.
	I mean, I'm giving you a B plus.
	But I'm going to also tell you, by the way, that one source you quoted, that's totally an unreliable source, which is not your fault.
	You don't know that.
	I'm not, so I'm still giving you a good mark.
	But unreliable source.
	He was a propaganda source.
	And, you know, I'll tell you what, kid.
	I was planning to do my major on World War II.
	And then I realized, oh, World War II has been done to death.
	And so I just got bored with it.
	And so I'm teaching this class, but it's not my passion anymore.
	And that really stuck with me.
	That World War II has been done to death.
	It's like, listen, zombie, Nazis, Wolfenstein.
	Hey, yeah, let's have a fun video game.
	Right?
	Let's go blow up some zombie Nazis.
	Sure, why not?
	I'm down for that.
	When you got movies like Sucker Punch, when you get tiresome.
	I am not interested in the Nazis.
	I know about the Nazis under protest.
	So I've never been a major scholar on it.
	It does not interest me.
	It's cartoonified.
	It's exaggerated.
	But one thing that has really struck with me is the extreme villainization of the swastika.
	Which is, it's an ancient symbol.
	It's all throughout Indo-European culture.
	It's actually quite a beautiful symbol as well.
	And it's been so demonized and manipulated by the Nazis.
	And the fact that they're doing the exact same thing to the rainbow is equally, are they doing the same damn thing to the rainbow?
	They take a holy symbol and they twist it into a political ideology.
	Because the LGBT is not about lesbians.
	It's not about gays.
	It's not about bisexuals.
	It's not even about transgendered anymore.
	If you're a transgender person that fits in, that nobody knows is transgender, they call you stealthing.
	You're supposed to be obnoxiously transgender to immunitize the eschaton.
	They demand celebration.
	To quote Eleazar Yutkowski again, the opposite of intelligence, or sorry, the opposite of stupidity is not intelligence.
	They're demanding celebration.
	Oh, well, let's condemn them.
	No, I don't think that's the right path.
	Don't become the enemies they're trying to turn us into.
	Don't become...
	I mean, like, we're not going to become the Nazis, okay?
	Because the Nazis were a Gnostic cult.
	The reason they hate the Nazis is because they are the same thing.
	By the way, I don't even buy that they actually hate the Nazis anymore.
	I mean, as much as the radical left loves to go on about Nazi, Nazi, Nazi, Nazi, I do not buy that they actually hate the Nazis.
	I think they like convincing us that they hate the Nazis and then accuse us of being Nazis.
	Because, like, either way, the reaction is the action.
	Either we deny that we're Nazis.
	I am nothing like the Nazis.
	I would never judge anybody on their skin color.
	That's racist.
	By the way, for any new viewers, Amadi is a beautiful Indian lady.
	Okay, so F off.
	Either we race cuck, or we're like, oh, you're gonna call me a Nazi?
	I'm gonna be a super Nazi, and I'm gonna hate gay people and black people and whatever other minority group you can put in front of me.
	Hating is not our way, it is their way.
	Philosophia Sophia Street.
	Sophia, also known as Athena, goddess of war.
	She's a beautiful, cruel bitch.
	As General Lee said, it is good that war is so awful, otherwise, men would come to love it too much.
	War is fascinating to men.
	I've said before, the most fun I've had in the past decade is when I got into a three-way fight with two old bitches that outweighed me.
	And I snapped two fingers in the process of winning that fight.
	Good lord, it was glorious.
	I loved it.
	I do not regret the snapped fingers.
	It was the best fun I'd had, geez, at least in ten years.
	There is something fascinating about war.
	And there's something humiliating.
	Humbling, I was going to say, but humiliation leads to humbleness.
	Don't resent your humiliations.
	That's a lesson from God.
	War humiliates and engages men.
	It is so tempting.
	It's so fantastic.
	And yet so awful at the same time.
	And those who love wisdom, those who love Sophia.
	Let's look at Plato.
	Plato, as far as I understand, I hope I'm not wrong about this, but Plato was not his actual name.
	It was his nickname, which he got in the wrestling matches because he was a very famous wrestler.
	Plato means the wide one.
	He was very good at goju-ru karate.
	The Greek philosophers were warriors.
	And great warriors.
	War is not with one great.
	Aristotle was Alexander's mentor.
	There is something fascinating and great about war.
	But be cautious, man, you might lose.
	Whereas the sophists, the Marxists, Those who are so dedicated to spreading democracy and human peace really seem to love the disgusting degree of atrocity that comes with war.
	So that's another interesting aspect, that our side, we love guns.
	We love martial arts.
	We love war.
	And yet, like wolves competing for dominance within the pack, we prefer to fight non-lethally.
	You know, maybe I'm getting old, but one of the things I'm very grateful for is I never had to murder anybody while I was in the Canadian military.
	I was completely willing to do so, and I still am, if my country needs me.
	Hell, if an innocent person needs me, I'll do what needs to be done.
	But I'm quite glad I don't have that blood staining my soul.
	It's good that war is so awful, otherwise men would come to love it too much.
	But those who claim to possess Sophia, those who have historically ruled over the gulags, ruled over the genocides, that is the peace they offer.
	That's the wisdom they offer.
	They don't love war the way we do.
	The challenge, the potentiality.
	You know, we make a big thing out of sports.
	I've never been much of a sports guy, although I did cry when my football team lost the...
	Not the championship, but the one right before the championship, the divisional, whatever it was called.
	We won it, we missed it by one touchdown, and all of us guys in grade 12, we were crying.
	Even though it's only a stupid sports ball game.
	When men hunt, hunting is pretty close to it.
	But men like us, we treat the animals with honor.
	We don't torture them.
	We're not cruel to them.
	We give them a clean death.
	War is that thing, like philosophy.
	We love wisdom, we love war, but we are but frail mortals that don't engage in it willy-nilly.
	Let's see.
	Rainbow.
	Oh, and by the way, the rainbow, the gay pride rainbow has six colors.
	That's the number of Saturn, of death.
	That's the cube.
	That's the hexagon at the North Pole of Saturn, the planet.
	The real rainbow has seven colors.
	There's seven notes, which, by the way, that's mathematically derived, okay?
	The seven notes that we have in the musical scale, that's mathematically derived.
	That's inherent to reality.
	And furthermore, they don't line up perfectly.
	Again, if you study musical theory, music does, it's not perfect.
	Nothing in this world is perfect.
	Utopia is not possible.
	Six is the number of deaths.
	Six is the hexagon, which lines up perfectly in infinite hexagons.
	A dried mud field turns into hexagons.
	Hexagons are the symbol of completion and death.
	Seven, that's number of good luck.
	That's number of color.
	Again, there are seven colors in a rainbow.
	In a real rainbow.
	And yet the pride flag has six.
	Make that what you will.
	And yes, I'm happy pointing that out as well.
	Are they destroying symbols just like they're tearing down statues?
	I think they are.
	And they're turning reason and faith into enemies.
	They immonetize the eschaton.
	Turn all into incoherent madness.
	And then somehow utopia.
	That is their plan.
	Yeah, I know it's just Star Wars, guys, but Darkseid is faster and easier, but it's not stronger.
	Building, loving, forgiving, creating.
	That's hard.
	That's really hard.
	Starting rebellions, easy.
	Being pissed off.
	Finding something to be pissed off about is rather easy.
	So I'm going to finish things off with, what is her name?
	Mary Bailey.
	Mary Bailey, the lady that founded the Lucius Trust.
	The one that was friends with Margaret Sanger of Planned.
	Planned Parenthood.
	What's the old saying?
	Man makes plans and the gods laugh?
	That's humility.
	That's humility.
	Planned parenthood.
	That's pride.
	Oh, we had an oops baby?
	Guess we will murder it.
	Because the only way we can immunitize the eschaton is by asserting man's supremacy over man.
	I'm going to finish off by telling you my fundamental...
	Is our side right?
	I'm not positive.
	I'm not sure.
	I have faith.
	I have faith.
	I can't prove you.
	I can't scientifically prove that we're going to win.
	I have faith that we're going to win.
	I have faith that God always wins.
	But I can prove to you that their side is going to lose.
	There's this, um, I read this joke a long time ago.
	I didn't think it was very funny.
	I thought it was didactic and smarmy.
	It's uh, it's obviously from a like a Churchian type of perspective, where it's like God makes a bet with some scientists about whether or not they can create life, and the scientists they get ready to do their experiment with like lightning bolts and sulfur and chemistry, and God says, oh yeah, you gotta start with your own dirt.
	You can't use mine, And it's one of those oh gotcha scientists.
	You didn't make your own dirt, God made the dirt.
	Bit smarmy bit annoying But does speak to the to a foundational truth which is okay, so so let's Let's pretend for a second that this is the Demiurge's world that this world it's so ugly and awful It's not beautiful and inspiring and cool.
	No, it's awful.
	It's ugly.
	The Demiurge made this world for us and So we are going to immatize the eschaton by smashing everything of the demiurge.
	We're going to smash the patriarchy, we're going to smash the white supremacy, we're going to destroy everything.
	Well, what is there other than our fellow human beings?
	If you look at critical race theory, if you look at queer theory, if you look at all of these neo-Marxist Gnostic cults, they're being pushed upon us.
	Every single one is founded upon increasing the misery index so that everybody is an advocate.
	Everybody is an activist.
	We're not going to teach reading, writing, and math.
	We're going to teach how to manipulate the government, how to be a victim, how to be part of the brain-washed majority.
	In the same way the scientist that is tasked with creating life is reliant upon using the chemistry and the chemicals that God created, the Gnostic that wants to imitize the eschaton...
	that doesn't believe material reality exists, that it's nothing but a mass delusion created by humanity, the species animal.
	If humanity is all that exists, then your only tools are other humans.
	The only way to imitize the eschaton is to step on other people.
	Crabs in a bucket.
	This is why Marx got accused of being a fake philosopher, of dodging the question.
	Because the other side claims to be building a new Eden.
	Well, what are you going to build it out of?
	Corpses.
	Let's pretend that they're right.
	That material reality doesn't exist.
	There is nothing but the human mind and our projection of reality.
	Okay, so how are you going to convince everybody to project the utopia?
	Gulags and torture.
	That's their only answer.
	What about the people that like this game?
	What about the people that like the mountains, like the forests?
	They like farming.
	They like fixing cars.
	What about these people?
	Genocide.
	Genocide is the answer to those people.
	Because so long as you are good at fixing a car and somebody else isn't, there's hierarchy.
	The eschaton can't immunitize when there's hierarchy.
	So folks, I think when you really grok this, when you really get what they're up to, you can start to see the pattern forming.
	That yes, yes, we are ruled by a cabal of wizards, and it's a war that's been going on for millennia.
	And I suspect, and this is just, I'm tossing this out there, and I don't have solid evidence.
	I suspect that every aonic shift, every 2,150 years, every time our poll proceeds around the twelve symbols of the skies,
	we wind up having a major conflict between, for lack of better terms, the right-hand path and left-hand path.
	Right-hand path, we are but mortals doing our best.
	And we're going to forgive one another and love one another.
	Left-hand path, man is God.
	I expect we've lost this war a few times.
	If we lose the war this time, 2,000 years of rule by artificial intelligence, that's going to be interesting.
	But I can easily see us winning this one.
	That they've lulled humanity into this belief that their religion is just a crazy superstition.
	That the future is spaceships and science and whatnot.
	Even though the spaceships and science are fundamentally religious in nature, religion is still fake, according to them.
	Barari saying we're going to rewrite the Bible using artificial intelligence because man is a hackable animal.
	When all that exists is man, all that is meaningful is power.
	The ability to control your fellow man.
	And this is why Gnosticism can wear a very nice outfit.
	It can be about educating people and spreading democracy.
	It can wear a very nice outfit.
	And many of the adherents are not sadists.
	But at the end of the day, if man is all that exists, then the only thing that has any meaning is power over your fellow man.
	And I don't care how many Amazon dildos or orgasms or fast cars or fancy outfits you get with that thing.
	If all that really exists is power over your fellow man, that sounds like hell to me.
	To quote C.S. Lewis, you know, maybe we're just a big bunch of babies.
	Believing in our Aslan, that's really just a jumped-up cap, believing the sun, which is nothing but a jumped-up lamp.
	But if we're just babies living in a made-up world, and you Gnostics are right, nothing exists but power and technology, control, graft, and manipulation, really says something about your universe with a bunch of babies playing make-believe and come up with a better world than yours.
	I choose to live in the world of the good, the true, and the beautiful.
	And quite frankly, I think you Gnostic bastards are losing this war.
	Carpe tuturum tenetratitum.

▲