You people aren't even ready for a real argument. Let's get back to basics.
My blog: http://www.staresattheworld.com/
My Twitter: http://twitter.com/Aurini
Download in MP3 Format: http://www.youtubeconvert.cc/
Request a video here: http://www.staresattheworld.com/aurinis-insight/
Support my In Depth Analysis series through Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/DMJAurini
Credits:
I Feel You by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
It is the day after Labor Day, and I am dressed in white.
White in the spirit of truth and clarity.
I am wearing white because we need some truth and accuracy right now.
And it just so happens to be an accent of history, that the futuristic shade of blue, of the blue collar, of the blue future,
it just so happens to be that that shade of blue, that ultraviolet futuristic blue, is the color used to lull you into an LSD-induced MK ultra coma.
And that the color of white, of actual sunlight, is the cure.
It just so happens, complete accident of history, that all of those that come out of communist countries, they come out affirming not basic syllogisms, but basic grammar.
Those who have lived under totalitarianism, they're not spouting rhetoric because you people aren't ready for rhetoric, are you?
You're nowhere near ready for rhetoric.
You're not even ready for logical syllogisms.
Trying to get you to understand basic grammar is enough of a challenge.
And so this day after Labor Day, we are dressed in white to discuss basic grammar because that's what you need.
A is A. If A then B?
You're not ready for that.
You don't even know what A and B are.
You do not know what statements are.
You do not know what grammar is.
And so the day after Labor Day, we are not wearing blue.
We are wearing white because we need to get right back down to basics.
You know, this is something I've talked about before, isn't it?
The trivium, the medieval trivium.
You start with grammar, move on to logic, and then finally you get to rhetoric.
Whereas the modern education system flips it on its head.
You know, you start off with rhetoric.
We spend 12 years inducting children into rhetoric.
And then for the ones that are particularly intelligent, we send them to university.
And they learn a little bit of logic.
So even when their rhetoric fails to perform, they can logic their way into still believing the rhetoric.
And then the real deep magic, these days is deep magic.
If you get a PhD, you're allowed to learn about the hate facts because you have been sufficiently indoctrinated into not believing hate facts anymore that you'll be able to logic and rhetoric them all away.
This is the state of our civilization.
Nothing but endless rhetoric on both sides of the equation.
We use words without understanding what words are.
You know, Ayn Rand didn't escape communist Russia to try and expand logical fallacies.
Right?
The thesis of her novel was not: if A, then B does not mean B, therefore A.
Okay, logical fallacies, these are completely beyond the population right now.
Way over their head.
Logical fallacies.
Don't even.
You teach somebody about logical fallacies.
They'll find five more ways to justify gay marriage and drug addiction.
No, no, we're not ready for that.
A is A. Basic freaking grammar.
This is where we start.
Basic freaking grammar.
Words have meanings, and I don't even know how to explain this to you people.
I mean, if you don't realize that words have meanings, where do we go from there?
Yeah, let's start off with a word.
Let's start off with a word.
And we're going to break down the meanings behind it.
We're going to start with the word bullshit.
Now, you all know what bullshit means, don't you?
Okay, good, good.
You know what it means.
Now, do you actually know what it means in the context?
What is the explanation behind this term?
Somebody says X and you say bullshit.
What do you actually mean?
You see, there's two basic definitions of bullshit.
I mean, there's plenty of other subtler tones and so forth.
But there's two main primary definitions of bullshit.
The first one, when you say bullshit, you're saying, Joe, Joe, you are lying to me, and you're probably lying to me for a self-serving purpose.
You're scamming me.
You know you're lying, but you're lying to get some sort of advantage over me.
That's the first meaning of bullshit.
The second meaning of bullshit is, Joe, what you said contradicts reality.
What you said, you might believe it, but I know it's false.
And you know, sometimes, sometimes when people say bullshit, they mean both things at once.
And I'm sure right now, about 90% of you are scratching your head.
Why is Arini making an issue about this?
Why does he care?
Let me try and explain to you why this matters every other day.
I see some sort of tweet or YouTube comment or whatever with some damn dirty liberal saying, oh, Trump's going to build the wall and make Mexico pay for it, LOL.
They're calling bullshit on Donald Trump.
And we're going to, you know what?
Guys, guys, we're using metaphors here.
Okay?
I'm trying to explain grammar to you.
This is not a, this is not a rhetorical analysis of the future of the United States and Western civilization.
You're not ready for that.
Okay, if we can't nail down basic grammar, then we can't even begin to get to rhetoric.
So we're just going to boil down all of Donald Trump into build the wall and make Mexico pay for it.
And we're going to look at the people that call bullshit on that.
Now, there's two ways that they're calling bullshit on it.
The first way is that they're saying Donald Trump is bullshit because he's just a populist.
He's just being racist for the sake of racism.
He just wants to get elected.
He's just, he'll say whatever he wants to say.
That's the first definition of bullshit.
The second definition of bullshit is Donald Trump has a crazy plan.
He says Mexico's going to pay for the wall.
Mexico would never pay for the wall.
Why would they pay for the wall?
He believes in unicorns.
Those are basically the two arguments against Donald Trump.
Number one, he's just saying it to make people happy.
You know, so he's racist, sexist, whatever.
He's just that way to make people happy, and people are just voting for him because they're stupid and angry and he makes them feel happy.
That's the first argument against him.
Second argument is Donald Trump is crazy and he doesn't know how the world works.
And he thinks that if he's president, he can do magical things like make unicorns come around and get Mexico to pay for a wall, et cetera, et cetera.
And so the people voting for Donald Trump are unrealistic.
You know, they want fried ice.
They want unicorns.
Now do you notice something?
Yeah, I know some of you are smart.
Some of you have noticed it.
By breaking down the word bullshit, I've just isolated two of the major, like 99% of the people who don't like Donald Trump fall into one of these camps, don't they?
Either A, they say he's nothing but an emotional populist reaction, or B, he's promising the impossible.
Bullshit he's lying to us to get votes or bullshit he believes in fairies.
Now, what actually happens when you try and argue with one of these people?
If you've been foolish enough to go into a YouTube comment section and try and say, you say to person number one, well, Donald Trump, the judge, he just wants to get votes.
And you say that, like, well, he just wants to get votes and money.
Like, listen, the guy's already a millionaire, a billionaire.
His history is already established.
He actually has more to lose from being a president.
And so, based upon all the evidence, I'm actually very convinced he is doing this because he wants America to be great.
He is doing this for the benefit of all of us because he sees where things are heading.
No, no, he's not a liar like every other freaking politician.
He actually gives a hoot about America.
Well, what happens?
What happens when you say that to that person?
He's just manipulating you with racism to get votes.
Actually, no, I have plenty of proof that he's a genuine patriot.
Immediately, they switch to the other side.
Well, Donald Trump doesn't know what he's doing and he won't eat police and unicorns.
And you say, well, actually, he does have a very well worked out plan as to why Mexico will pay for this wall, why it will be in their financial best interest to pay for this wall.
He's not a union boss promising bread and circuses.
He's a businessman promising a profitable outcome.
As soon as he says, Well, they go back to the other side.
Well, you're just appealing to emotion.
You just don't like Mexicans because you're lazy.
Are you starting to see why I care about grammar?
The word bullshit, as I said, it has two major sessions.
Number one, you're being scammed.
Number two, they believe in fairies.
But here's the thing.
When you talk to somebody that uses the word bullshit and they're committed to their rhetorical conclusion, the rhetorical conclusion is that Donald Trump will be a good president.
or that he will be like Hitler squared.
That's the rhetorical conclusion.
But instead of the rhetoric growing naturally, starting with grammar into logic, into rhetoric, instead of that, we start with the rhetoric and we build downwards.
So, if the logic that says Donald Trump is bad requires that Donald Trump be bullshit, then we take the word bullshit and we use whatever definition necessary to prove our rhetorical statement.
Instead of starting with facts and discovering patterns and then coming up with an ideal, we do the opposite.
We imagine a perfect pattern, figure out how we could rationalize or justify that perfect pattern, and then we fit the facts to meet our objectives.
This is why people that come out of communist societies, they're not interested in campaign slogans.
They're not even interested in rhetoric, or rather, rather, logic.
Because, you know, logic is a horse.
It gives anybody a ride.
They're interested in basic grammar.
Define your terms.
Know what you're talking about.
Gay marriage.
Here's a...
Here's another one: gay freaking marriage.
99.9% of the population has no argument against gay marriage.
And you know why they don't have an argument against it?
Because they do not have grammar.
Love is love.
What is love?
What is good?
Tell me, what is the difference between feeling good and addiction?
What is the difference?
Do you know what the difference is?
If you go home every night and have sex with your wife, that's good.
If you pick up some slut from the bar, guess what?
That ain't so good.
If you are so addicted to sex that when you're on a business trip, you need to cheat on your wife.
What's the difference?
Love is love, right?
Love is love, ain't it?
Do you have any functional definition of what love is, of what goodness is, of what truth is?
Do you have any grammar?
Does anything mean anything to you?
It's all convenience.
It's all outcome.
Outcome's all that matters.
Utility.
You know what utility says?
Utility says that the trap, you know, given that you're drunk and it's been a while, that looks enough like a woman.
That's utility for you.
And you know what else is utility?
This bitch might be crazy.
This bitch might have daddy issues, but she'll give me a really good blowjob tonight, won't she?
And do any of you care to explain to me the difference between those two?
I mean, I know that those of you that are addicted to rhetoric are going to say, well, first of all, you're a fucking faggot, man.
You're a fucking, you let a dude suck your dick.
Yeah, you let a crazy chick suck your dick.
You're going to give me statistics about fucking AIDS now?
When you completely lack the ability to define what a marriage is, why marriage is sacred, and why gay marriage is a contradiction in terms, when you lack the basic grammar to do that?
Let me be perfectly frank.
This is the problem with our cultures.
We have no grammar.
Forget logic, forget rhetoric.
You're not ready for that.
We have no freaking grammar.
We don't know what things mean.
The chemicals in my brain tell me that they are just chemicals, therefore there is no God.
Well done, atheist cult.
How clever you are.
We have no valuation.
All we care about is niceness.
And this is why I feel so hopeless is because you guys will not start using words like they mean something.
Man is a rationalizing animal.
Here's the thing, my dog.
My dog might get sneaky sometimes.
But my dog is never against her own character.
She knows what her character is.
Do you know what your character is?
Have you achieved the same level of moral being as a dog?
See, when you start with rhetoric, when rhetoric is your justification for existing, you become the rationalizing animal.
Rhetoric, the appearance of things, your Facebook profile.
Are you popular with the in-crowd?
Do you say the right things?
That's rhetoric.
And listen, I pray to God that Trump wins this election, because if he doesn't, I might have a very painful death ahead of me.
For your Trump 2016 America for I would rather that Hillary won the election and people actually started waking up to what words meant.
Look at Canada right now.
Look at my home country.
Look at how broken and sick and suicidal that entire country that just sold the souls of their citizens to the Chinese government.
Look at that sick country.
Do you think Trudeau is the problem with Canada?
Trudeau's not the problem.
Trudeau's a moron.
Trudeau's a skihill instructor that wants trannies to like him.
Trudeau's not the freaking problem.
All of the mess that he's going to cover, he's going to cause in the next few years.
We could clean that up in six months.
Hell, everything, all the bad garbage he's doing to Canada could be compensated for with a moral and intelligent citizenry.
Alternatively, you know what?
Make me God Emperor of Canada for 20 years, 30 years, and I get to control everything but the schools, the television, and the church.
I get to control the economy, the laws, the foreign everything.
And you know what?
I look into finding the best advisors in the world.
You know, I get the best, I get Aaron Clary for my economic advisor, etc.
I've got the smartest SOBs advising me as I rule Canada as God Emperor for 20 years.
Well, in 20 years, Canada is going to be a very rich nation, a very secure nation.
It's going to be doing pretty good because I made all the right decisions.
And then two years after I'm gone, they're taken over by the Mexicans.
or Saudi Arabia, or China, or Pakistan, or Nigeria.
Because our basic culture, our basic moral values, A is whatever you feel like, bro.
I don't want to judge love as love.
So I sure as hell hope that Trump wins.
For my sake, for your sake, for his sake, for our children's and our grandchildren's sake, I sure as hell hope he wins.
But his victory, his victory is useless if we have an immoral populace.
And the beginning of morality is definition.
It is grammar.
Let me draw a different tact with you folks.
Because I'm pretty sure none of you are listening.
Let's say you want to build an automobile.
Okay, and I'm going to presume that you guys have some, I'll explain it briefly: what an automobile does.
You combine gasoline and oxygen and an electric spark, it causes a very powerful explosion, which shoves a piston downward.
And we use that momentum of the piston going down to create torque, to create a spinning wheel.
Now, I could go back to Roman times.
Yeah, I could explain all of this to them.
They could understand it, but you know what?
They wouldn't be able to build an engine.
You know why not?
Because they don't have metric tools.
Because they do not have an established system of widths and measurements and weights and tensile strength of steel and so forth.
And so if I tell you about a gasoline engine and you try and build a gasoline engine using a mixture of imperial bolts and metric bolts and well, it'll just work, man.
And you don't get the basics down.
If you cannot nail down the basics, you cannot do the advanced stuff.
And how many of you actually give enough of a damn to learn the basics?
Do you know what the sad thing is?
Here's the really sad thing.
In martial arts circles, you know, people that study karate or kung fu or whatever, MMA.
It's all about the basics, man.
95% of martial arts is nailing down the basics.
And these people will practice how to do kicks and punches and etc.
They will nail all of that down.
When odds are in today's world, you're never, well, you're not going to get into a fist fight until the invading waves of Muslims kick down your door to murder you and rape your wife.
These people will focus on the basics whenever it comes to garbage that doesn't matter.
They'll learn the basics of martial arts.
Hell, they will take video games and they will break down the basics of video games.
What's the plus-three bonus on this?
What's the way to min-max my character and optimize?
They will do that.
They will not learn the basics of language.
And language is what makes us human.
And sometimes, I swear to God, man, I swear to God, folks, sometimes I try and say, hey, buddy, you've got two apples over here.
You've got two apples over there.
You put them together.
now you've got four apples.
And they respond to me, Well, uh, what if we replace apples with oranges?
And that's so incredibly beyond stupid that it honestly leaves me at a loss.
This...
this whole topic it it makes me feel quite hopeless what do you believe What do you value in life?
You know, and common filth.
I know I've been referencing him a lot lately, but you know what?
This is why I like common filth.
This is why I like him.
On the one hand, he's a lot less intellectual than I am.
And that does not mean stupid.
I know you people have really fucking bad grammar, but intellectual doesn't mean smart, and non-intellectual does not mean stupid.
He's less intellectual than I am.
He just says it like it is.
But his grammar is good.
He does not contradict himself five times in one sentence.
His grammar is good.
His statements are coherent.
And the sad, you want to know the sad thing about our reality, about our civilization, is that he's needed.
Is that he is considered profound for stating A is A for having values, which he tells you what those values are, then following them to their logical conclusions.
You know, I'm going to finish this off, but I want to give you one final example of why grammar is so important and what grammar is.
Because part of the problem with the English language is that we eliminated 99% of the signs of grammar from it.
And so we don't even know what grammar is.
You know, a couple weeks ago, the priest gave a really good sermon at my church.
It's a fairly large church.
I guess about two or three hundred people inside of it.
And yet he had the testicular fortitude to call out feminism.
It was subtle.
He wasn't church militant with the whole thing, but he called it out.
You know, basically just saying that walking around demanding your rights and demanding all of this.
No, that's not what God wants you to be doing.
That's not femininity.
It was subtle.
And then later on in the sermon, he referred to gender.
Gender.
The priest said gender, and he was not discussing the declension of a noun.
And so I actually approached him after service.
I don't know if he thought I was a prick or if he heard what I had to say.
I did try and say it humbly, but I tried to correct his use of the word gender.
Because humans, people do not have gender.
We have sex.
Gender is an attribute of nouns.
Now, some of you speak a bit of French or Italian or Spanish or Latin.
You know all about this, but let me try and sum this up for the monolinguists out there.
In most languages, okay, and listen, I'm not going to offer a strong opinion on the Eastern languages.
I only speak a little tiny bit of Chinese.
But on most of the Western languages, those that come from Indo-European roots, you know, Sanskrit, whatever, which is every language spoken in Europe, you ignorant pigs, because I just know I've got some atheist cults still listening that don't know anything about language development and think I'm a religious nutter.
Good lord.
Indo-European languages.
The nouns have genders.
Some nouns are masculine nouns, and others are feminine nouns.
And in some cases, you even have neuter nouns, like in German.
But since we're all English speakers, I'm going to try and explain this to you using English examples.
The noun dog is a masculine noun.
All dogs are assumed masculine unless otherwise specified.
Right?
We use the masculine terminology for dogs until they are identified as a bitch.
So my brown-furred, half-German shepherd, half whatever she is, I can refer to her as my dog, which is a masculine noun, or I can refer to her as my bitch, which is a feminine noun.
Cats, on the other hand, Cat is a feminine noun.
Cat is assumed feminine.
And if you want to specify a male cat, the correct word is tom.
This is where the word tomboy derives from.
Because cat is assumed feminine, and Tom is the exception to that.
When there is a woman that likes things that are stereotypically masculine, she is a tomboy from the word Tom from cat.
Goose and geese, that's another feminine noun.
And so if you want to specify a male goose, the correct term is gander.
And with the human species, well, man, mankind refers to both men and woman.
Man, human, has a masculine gender.
If you want to talk about a particular person, that's when the gender then approximates that person.
Language, right there, completely separate from biology and distinctly separate.
All ganders are part of geese, which is feminine, but when it comes to individuals, when it comes to my dog, when it comes to my bitch, she has a double X chromosome.
Period.
Her sex is female.
So my dog, masculine pronoun, or masculine noun, has a female sex.
She is a bitch.
female noun.
And the same thing goes for all of us.
If any of you ladies listening out there, you're part of mankind, which is a masculine noun.
And any of you guys listening out there, in times and places you have been a helper, which is a feminine noun, versus an assistant, which is a masculine noun.
And for the record, I just made the last two of those up because, like I said, we lost track of these things a long time ago in the English language.
Neither of these have any bearing on your sex.
Okay?
Nurse.
Nurse is a feminine noun.
And we have plenty of male nurses out there.
It does not change the chromosome.
It does not change their sex.
Humans do not have genders.
They have sexes.
If you're born XX, you're XX for life.
If you're born XY, you're XY for life.
And on the rare cases of intersex, there is a specific medical diagnosis there, and there is ninety nine, even with that, ninety-nine point nine percent of people are not intersex, and ninety-nine point nine percent of the people that are intersex, you usually don't detect it until they have fertility problems in marriage.
It's that strongly presenting one sex or the other, and half the ones that don't present die in infancy.
Let's put it this way: if there were any legitimate cases of intersex people out there, there would be a huge amount of pornography of it.
There are more Siamese twins out there than there are legitimate cases of ambiguous intersex children.
But you know, this child molester named Dr. Money, psychologist that liked to molest children and had a whole bunch of wacko theories that are completely in tune with all of you people that don't love grammar.
that don't love truth.
He decided to replace the word sex with gender.
Look up Dr. Money.
Look up the article on Return of Kings.
I don't want to talk about it anymore.
The fact of the matter is that if you don't know the difference between sex and gender, if you think human beings have gender, if you don't realize that words have meanings,
if you don't know how to parse the difference between a meaning and a feeling, if all you live for is rhetoric, then it doesn't matter which side you're on.
I mean, it doesn't matter if you're on my side or on their side.
Ultimately, you're a destructive force of chaos.
And you've renounced that ability which makes you human.
Language is the beginning of reason.
And if you do not have language, if you have not mastered language, well, you have less authorship, You have less self-control than my bitch.
