All Episodes
Previous Next
April 4, 2015 - Davis Aurini
24:10
A Fictional Social Justice Dystopia

My blog: http://www.staresattheworld.com/ Requested videos: http://www.staresattheworld.com/aurinis-insight/ My Twitter: http://twitter.com/Aurini Download in MP3 Format: http://www.clipconverter.cc/ Credits: I Feel You by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey folks, welcome to another requested video.
Now, the generation of this video is rather interesting.
It was a request by somebody who's working on a project right now, and they wanted me to describe what a social justice society would look like.
What sort of mechanisms and institutions do I see existing in that dystopia?
And so, I'm not too familiar with the project just yet, but this is going to be kind of a description of how I would imagine it occurring.
Now, of course, before we get to the description itself, we need to address the question, what is social justice?
Now, about seven months ago, I did a video right there contrasting justice and social justice to one another.
That was a very philosophical video going into the flaws with Jonathan Rawls' ideology.
That's not what I'm asking here.
You know, because the philosophical questions, click that video to check them out.
This is more about what is this movement that we call social justice?
And more importantly, what isn't it?
Well, first of all, social justice is not pro-woman.
Okay, it is certainly very feminist.
It's an aspect of feminism.
But it's not pro-woman.
It's not pro-trans.
It's not pro-minority.
These are just the arguments that the social justice movement gloms on to.
These are the groups that they pander to to ultimately undermine society.
And let's just look at this briefly with feminism, for example.
Feminism, when you get right down to it, it's not about empowering women.
It's about destroying femininity and destroying masculinity.
Okay, the reason they attack masculinity is because they want women to act masculine.
They're against the family.
They don't want women staying home and raising their own children.
They want women to be cogs in the corporate machine, just another peon of society.
They want women working and paying taxes and sleeping with lots of men.
You know, they describe that as empowering when all it does is it desensitizes women and it winds up making women miserable.
So by getting women into the workplace, you undermine many of the attraction triggers that men have.
By attacking masculinity, again, you undermine those attraction triggers.
You make the women less feminine and you make the men less masculine and you make everybody miserable.
It's standard Marxism.
It's about making everybody miserable so you can rewrite them.
You can turn everybody into the new communist man.
It's not pro-woman in and of itself.
If social justice could get some traction doing something that would seem pro-man anti-woman, they'd do it at the drop of a hat.
And ultimately, yeah, men and women, we're in this together.
You know, There is no innate war between the sexes.
It's a manufactured war to harm both the sexes.
The next thing that social justice isn't, it isn't a coherent set of beliefs.
It is not an actual philosophy.
It's not an actual purpose and a movement.
It's a purely reactive force.
It's purely caustic in nature.
It deconstructs everything.
It doesn't actually have any thrust behind it.
It's a form of intellectual laziness because it's easy to tear things apart, very hard to build something.
And a perfect example of this is the fact that social justice supports both feminism and the GLBT movement when these two philosophies are in direct contradiction of one another.
You see, the feminist movement argues that gender, as they abuse the term, that gender is a social construct, that men and women are inherently equal and that there's no differences whatsoever.
I mean, look at ones like Anita Sarkeeshin.
She actually believes that men and women are just as strong as one another.
They think there's no fundamental differences between the sexes, and yet, despite this lack of difference, one sex, the male, decide to oppress the female for all of history.
And so we need to get rid of harmful gender stereotypes, gender stereotypes oppress men too, etc., etc.
That everybody is completely identical and we're all programmed by society to behave the way that we do.
The reason boys like fire trucks and girls like dolls is because society programmed us.
The GLBT movement, on the other hand, says that gender is innate.
People don't learn to be gay.
Gay is not a choice.
Gay is something you're born with.
Trans people are born in the wrong body.
That they're not blank slates.
That they're young boys born with the personality or the mind of a girl, or young girls born with the personality and mind of a boy.
That you cannot reprogram your own nature.
That it is innate.
So feminism, we're all blank slates.
GLBT, we're all programmed from the get-go.
It's biological.
These are completely contradictory philosophies, completely contradictory views of human nature, and yet they're in the same camp.
Because that camp of social justice is not interested in discovering the truth, in advocating for the truth, or improving the human condition, in increasing tolerance and kindness and morality and ethics.
They're not interested in any of those.
They are purely interested in destroying, in deconstructing, in ripping apart the family, in turning everybody into a cripple that relies upon the government to take care of them.
That's ultimately what social justice is all about.
And yet at the same time, not even the devil can go against God.
Social justice cannot change the way the universe works.
They can break things.
You can take a car and you can break it, but it's not going to suddenly run on sunshine and happy smiles and feely good thoughts.
You know, you can break a sports car so it's not polluting the environment, but you can't turn it into a super happy, eco-friendly car.
And so social justice, they are still subject to the same basic nature of our biology, the same rules of economics, the same interpersonal ethics, consequences, karma, all of that.
They can break it pretty bad, but they're still going to have to conform to it.
So with that out of the way, let's consider what a social justice society would look like.
And I have six main points for this society, which is it's a little bit of a science fiction society.
We're imagining, you know, 50, 100 years in the future.
And you'll know, like, I am very inspired by 1984 and A Brave New World, amazing books about precisely this topic written over 50 years ago.
And if you haven't read them, you should.
Now, number one point.
It's going to be a matriarchy controlled by men.
The society as a whole will be matriarchal.
All of the majority of the positions of power and influence are going to be occupied by women.
You know, the Hillary Clintons, women wearing pantsuits, very embittered, arrogant, and nasty women will be in control, except they won't be in control, not ultimately.
And if you, as an example, if you look at the feminist movement nowadays, for the most part, it's men behind the scenes doing everything.
You know, Anita Sarkeesian is just saying what John McIntosh tells her.
There's a feminist organization in India recently where it came out that the man in charge of the thing was raping multiple women that he got into the movement.
And again, Hillary Clinton, guarantee you, there's a man behind the scenes controlling things and making sure everything goes tickety boo.
Now, this is not a statement to denigrate women, you understand.
This is not a statement to say that women are irresponsible or childish or foolish.
This is to say that feminist women are irresponsible, childish, foolish, venal, you name it.
Because again, we have this masculine and the feminine.
This is an aspect of our very core being, an aspect of reality, if you read Evola.
And see, a woman who embraces her femininity, who is demure, nurturing, beautiful, elegant, soft-spoken, that woman can be a very strong leader.
She will be very honest, very responsible.
Being such a true woman, she'll appreciate the masculine, and if she's in the situation where she needs to be masculine, she will, well, she'll be better than most of the guys we have nowadays.
And the same thing goes for the guy, for the broken male.
See, when you break a male and you encourage this feminine behavior, it's okay for boys to cry.
And in this social justice society, what you'll get, you'll still get that spur to dominance, but now it's been twisted.
You know, instead of becoming a dominant leader, a responsible leader with moral integrity, the man is now a passive-aggressive little sneak thief, a backbiter, a manipulator, a really nasty piece of work.
Instead of the responsible king or judge, you have got a sneaky male.
You've got a complete bastard and manipulator.
So in the society, the top 1% is going to be men.
That's just a law of nature.
The top 1% of people in power are always going to be men.
That's just how our species works.
But this society is going to be working under the delusion of female control.
So you'll have a really nasty, manipulative 1% of men that are basically behind the scenes.
They're the professors.
They're the policy makers.
They pretend like they're not in control.
But all the women do what they say without question while pretending they're in control.
You know, as opposed to healthy societies, men are generally in control, but they're open about it, and they're very concerned about the women, and they consult the women who don't themselves want to be in control, don't want to be in charge.
And this leads to the second point.
The military forces, the police forces, these are going to be entirely female.
The only male police officers allowed will be meter maids.
So the reason for this is that being a police officer or being a soldier naturally instills male virtue.
Integrity, courage, self-sacrifice, brotherhood.
No matter how corrupt the society, any organized body of men who are tasked with enforcing the law, and again, even in terrible societies, you know, the law is often 90% of the law is going to be about theft or assault or what have you.
So even most corrupt society in the world, 90% of it is still going to be about basic justice.
All of these would encourage masculinity.
And any sort of masculinity is going to engender femininity in the women.
And you just can't have this happen because when the masculine and feminine come together, they create a household, they have children that they care about, and suddenly you've got the building blocks of civilization.
You've got something positive happening.
So we can't have any of that.
So all of the security forces are going to be female.
Now they're going to be quite vicious.
Now there are certainly some women that have made excellent soldiers and excellent police officers.
But in an all-female environment, those women won't get promoted.
You know, same thing as we're seeing with the video games right now.
Women, you know, a smaller subset, but women have been there with video games all this time.
And it was wonderful.
Nobody complained.
Nobody got into arguments.
They were honest and decent and truly feminine in many cases.
Whereas now with the infiltration of these social justice warriors, we're getting these caddy, political, vicious, backstabbing, these women that are aping the way men act, the same way a transvestite apes the way a woman acts.
You can always recognize a transvestite because they dress way sexier than any woman ever would.
And the same thing with women that are trying to be men.
They're acting super aggressive, super masculine, and it's just absolutely farcical.
So yeah, security forces, all female and quite nasty and treacherous.
Now next.
And this is going to be a difficult one to talk about.
Ultimately, what the social justice society needs to do to maintain itself is to prevent pair bonding between people, is to prevent love.
And in this case, and I agree with this is actually from Brave New World.
They want to make sure that people are very, very sexually damaged.
In Brave New World, they did this by introducing sex at a very young age.
They would teach children three and four years old to play with each other sexually.
And I'm glad to say that that's still absolutely disgusting and horrific.
And it might be a very difficult thing to include in this project, although maybe it should be alluded to, you know, or it should be there in the design documents, even though you never acknowledge it.
Because if people who are molested as children have a lot of trouble pair bonding, have a lot of trou trusting as adults.
You can kind of see the early bits of this happening where we're very much sexualizing children.
There's a very sexual culture.
And the more casual sex you have, the harder it is to actually bond with somebody and get to know somebody.
When your Saturday night is just finding somebody on Tinder and having anonymous sex, building a relationship becomes harder and harder as time goes on.
And so I would see the society, assuming it has artificial wombs and vitro and fertilization, you have to do something to ensure that there's a replacement population.
But at the same time, they do not want people to pair bond.
They want a lot of casual sex, a lot of sexual damage.
And of course, a lot of homosexuality.
They do not want people, men and women, having sex and falling in love with each other.
That would be dangerous to what they're trying to build.
Next, you are going to have a very substantial criminal class, like the laborers, the people that are actually building this society, building the roads, fixing the sewers, all of that.
These people are going to be part of a very large criminal class.
And when I say criminal class, understand that here's the thing.
If you ever talk to somebody that is in the criminal class, they make light of how many crimes they've been convicted of.
They've wasted five years of their 20s in prison, and they're just indifferent to it.
You know, they've been pulled over multiple times for drunk driving, and they're paying through the nose for insurance, or they're driving illegally, and they might go back to prison.
They're completely unaware that there's any problem with this whatsoever.
And that's going to be the case with this society.
All of these, all of the laborers, all of the criminal class, they will have multiple times been arrested for rape because, of course, with people being so sexually broken, you're going to have that.
But they're not going to care.
I would even predict there's probably a lot of castration in the society because, again, you want to avoid that masculine energy, that testosterone that builds and defends itself.
And these men will probably look at castration as no big deal.
You know, or they don't want it to happen, but they're not going to think rationally about it occurring to them.
These people have been so brain-deadened and damaged by their upbringing that they just can't look at danger straight on.
They won't admit that it's coming at them.
They're terrified and they are broken, but they will never admit it.
They pretend it's not happening.
Completely irrational.
And for the most part, when they're not breaking the law, obedient.
That's going to be the largest sector of this society.
Now, the next group, the other sector, is going to be the effect intelligentsia.
And it's amongst this group that you'll have very prominent homosexuality.
You will have very, very empty entertainment for all of them.
Lots of drug use, of course.
Where they are so wimpy, the men in that one, they are so wimpy that they never break laws.
And so they don't really get in trouble.
You know, they're scared of women, they're intimidated by women.
You get all the kind of the lower class, those are the higher testosterone men, but they're very psychologically broken.
These are the broken, low testosterone men.
And that'll be your computer programmers, your architects, etc.
Now, my notes are over here.
This society is going to be undergoing a very gradual decline.
Without innovation, without people being committed to civilization, with people so distracted by the empty entertainment, by the drug use, by the easy sex and yet the very emotionally damaging sex.
There's not going to be any love.
There's not going to be any friendship or loyalty.
There's just cheap sex whenever you want it.
The whole thing's going to be undergoing a slow decline.
But the decline is not going to be acknowledged as such.
There's always going to be these very shrill voices in the media screaming about whose fault it is, blaming it on somebody else, and of course blaming that you're not aligning with the party ideology.
You're not being patriotic.
Again, like I was saying at the beginning, social justice doesn't stand for any one thing.
Right now, social justice is very anti-patriotic.
But in this society, patriotism will mean obeying your social betters, being obedient, supporting women, listen and believe, etc.
So yeah, it is going to be a society of stagnation with a lot of broken stuff.
Even the best of people, even the people that are trying to fight against it, they're not going to be heroic by our standards.
They're going to be very drug addicted.
They're going to be very venal.
They're going to all be overcoming major personal traumas in their own life.
They're all going to be very tragic figures.
So it's not the sort of society where you can have a protagonist who is a classical hero, who is somebody that's really accomplished, who's done amazing things.
It's going to be somebody that should be completely broken and yet they're getting back up anyway.
Anyway, I hope that helped.
I hope the rest of you folks enjoyed that.
▲
Export Selection