DOJ Revokes Rapper Over Anti-Israel Chant, England CRUSHED BY Mass Migration ft. Carl Benjamin
BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO SUPPORT THE SHOW - https://castbrew.com/ Become A Member And Protect Our Work at http://www.timcast.com Host: Tim Pool @Timcast (everywhere) Guest: Carl Benjamin @Sargon_of_Akkad (X) My Second Channel - https://www.youtube.com/timcastnews Podcast Channel - https://www.youtube.com/TimcastIRL DOJ Revokes Rapper Over Anti-Israel Chant, England CRUSHED BY Mass Migration ft. Carl Benjamin
State Department bans visas for English punk duo Bob Villain after Glastonberry performance.
Bob Villan led the crowds of Free, Free Palestine and Death to the IDF at the English Music Festival.
The State Department banned an English rap punk duo from performing in the U.S. after they appeared to lead a crowd in chants of supporting besieged Gaza residents and wishing death upon Israeli forces.
Visas for Bob Villain and his group of the same name were revoked in light of their hateful tirade at Glastonbury, including leading the crowd in death chants.
The rapper led Glastonbury Festival crowd chants.
We know they said it.
He also said From the River to the Sea, he could be seen saying on video shared across social media.
He said, Palestine must be free, will be, inshallah, will be free.
Now, the funny thing about From the River to the Sea is most of these activists don't know from which river to which sea.
But anyway, it refers to the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea.
And the phrase basically means Israel will cease to exist.
That's the light wave describing it.
Of course, as we know, if that is the case, lots of people will die.
Some pro-Palestinian activists say to call for peace in the region.
Others argue that those words qualify as hate speech.
A Somerset Police detective has been assigned to determine if any hate crime statutes were broken during the performance.
Now, additionally, this man was chanting on stage, you're never getting your country back.
You want your country back?
It's not going to happen.
And he was saying that to the British people.
This is a threat faced by the West.
And interestingly, we have similar issues here that the British are having there.
So I'm going to be pulling in our good friend Carl Benjamin right now.
So, Mr. Benjamin, I couldn't help but notice, well, we've noticed this for a long time.
The U.K. has been dealing with a lot of similar immigration issues that the U.S. has.
I think you guys, obviously, you're going in a different direction.
It's been very different.
But in the U.S., we have Donald Trump, the DOJs announced they will begin to denaturalize people, denaturalize individuals who are here and who have committed certain crimes, lose their citizenship, potentially deport them.
One story, a British individual who was distributing child sexual abuse material was denaturalized already.
So it's an interesting story.
I'm curious your take on that from a British perspective, but the context, of course, being we just saw Bob Villen chanting on stage at Glastonbury that you're never getting your country back.
So the context is that Glastonbury is a very white and middle class festival.
I don't know whether you've seen pictures of the crowd, but you'll notice that they're probably on average about, in fact, we know actually that they're about 40 on average in age.
They're Middle Englanders.
They're all basically all white and disproportionately people who work in office jobs.
So they're part of the sort of technocratic managerial regime.
And it seems that every year what they do at Glastonbury Festival is get a series of obscure ethnic acts to get up on stage, say, we hate Britain, so the crowd can cathartically cheer for it.
So yeah, God, we do as well.
Right.
And you might think that this is weird, but actually it's kind of necessary.
It's become kind of a religious rite for them because remember, these people are the system, right?
When the left is like, oh, this system is racist, it's homophobic, it's xenophobic, it's all these terrible ists and phobes.
They're liberals.
So they say, yeah, yeah, no, it's really bad, but my mortgage payments rely on it, right?
So I've got to go to work tomorrow.
And even though I agree with the radical leftists that the system is exactly as racist as you think it is, I have to go there and I have to do my job and I have to carry on and pay the bills.
And the thing is, there's also this kind of discordance in their minds because they also know the system isn't actually racist, right?
The system is actually anti-racist.
The system does everything it can to funnel resources from hardworking people via their taxes to disproportionately minority communities who don't pay taxes, who are not a net gain to the exchequer.
And so they know first person that it's not racist, but they can see the disparate outcomes and they say, oh, well, it just has to be racism.
It just has to be.
And so they have to live with this all day, every day, all year.
And Glastonbury is where they get to go and say, fuck the system whilst being the system to purge themselves of these ill humors that build up inside of them.
And so it's very, very performative.
And like I said, they do this basically every year.
They get like the most obscure ethnic acts that they can get and pretend like they've been big fans of these people where they say, you know, to hell with Britain, we hate the British, we hate white people, we hate the English.
And so Bob Villen is just following in that long tradition.
And actually, you'll notice that if you look at the media coverage, it's the people on social media, like, hang on, does he have a song that says you're never getting your country back and shut up about it?
Right.
It's the people on social media who see that.
And like, I'm not okay with that.
The media, the politicians, they're all screeching that he was like, death to the IDF.
And it's just like the IDF is an army.
Like, it's not like he's, you know, it's an active army engaged in military operations.
Obviously, it has enemies.
Like, the idea, and I'm not saying you know, you have to be for or against the idea.
And if you're, if you're for the idea, obviously, you don't want them to die, but you've got to concede that their enemies obviously do want them to die, which is why they're fighting them with real live ammunition and explosives.
And it's the same with like Russia and Ukraine.
If you're a Ukrainian and you say death to the Russian army, I'm like, of course you think that.
Of course.
And if you're a Russian, you say death to the Ukrainian army, because that's exactly what you're doing when you fight.
You're bringing death to your enemies.
So the pearl clutching over the statement over death to the item, it's like, what are you talking about?
That's a perfectly normal position to have regarding an enemy army.
And so it's not really very offensive at all.
The more offensive thing was the story he told about Zionists, right?
Because of course, he was at the United Talent Agency group.
And this is staffed at the top end entirely by Jewish people.
And so when he's giving this story about, oh, I work for Zionists and they're really pro-Israel and I really hate them.
Well, I mean, it was kind of expected that they'd say, well, right, okay, then, well, you're dropped, right?
But again, even that wasn't really the offensive thing.
That was what got him dropped from his label.
unidentified
It was the death of the IDF thing that got everyone up in a, it's like, right.
Because it shows you where people's interests lie, right?
So our political class and our media class are obsessed with defending Israel, which I think Israel is doing a perfectly good job of defending itself.
I can't help but notice that the IDF are one of the most capable military forces in the world.
They're highly experienced, they're highly effective, and they keep winning everywhere.
I don't think we need to be protective over them.
I think they're doing just fine.
And then on the other side, you've got the people who are like actually concerned about the state of the country and the nature of the country, the sort of moral telos of the country, where the country is going and who the country is actually for.
And that's where the Bob Villan song pissed everyone off because that song was recorded back in 2020, right?
This is not a new song.
And it's interesting that for the last five years, that record label was quite happy to publish his song about you're never getting your country back.
That was rub it in our face.
The BBC promoted this guy since 2016, trying to make him a star.
And all of a sudden, he's just like, well, I actually don't like Israel.
It is funny how it is largely blowing up in a lot of their faces.
These record labels, these media outlets have promoted the left being like, oh, all the woke stuff, whatever.
They didn't call it the woke stuff, but saying, oh, diversity, it's so fantastic.
And then one day, the guy they hired turns around and says, oh, by the way, also, we hate Israel.
And it's like, uh-oh, whoops.
But that was funny, too, because I think even Ted Cruz was getting flack because he shared a video of Bob Villen saying, death to the IDF.
And he was like, how could this be?
We got to investigate this.
And everyone's like, what?
Not the part where he's singing, you're never getting your country back to a bunch of Brits at a time when they're dealing with a mass migration crisis?
And then Great Britain is the largest island of this archipelago.
And then there are lots of small islands circling around it.
That's the British Isles.
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the political jurisdiction of the Crown of the United Kingdom, which is over Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
And then in Great Britain, the big island, you have Scotland, England, and Wales as the constituent national ethnicities of those groups.
So the English give their name to England, the Welsh give their name to Wales, the Scottish give their name to Scotland.
It's actually the reverse of in America, if you think about it.
America, the continent, Gives its name to the Americans in Europe.
French people give their name to France.
And so it's where the people are in the old world rather than what the continent is.
Because, I mean, before the English arrived in England 1,500 years ago, it was called Britannia.
So it wasn't called England.
England didn't exist at that point.
So it's a sort of strange reversal on that.
And yeah, no, I mean, it's well understood in Britain that British means it's a purely political and legal identity as in the British state, because the United Kingdom was formed as a union of crowns between England and Scotland in, I can't, in the 17th century, I can't remember the exact date.
And it was formalized into the union of the United Kingdom and of Scotland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland in 1707, with the Act of Union.
But the constituent nations never went away.
The Welsh identity has been quite strong, the Scottish identity is strong.
And to be honest with you, the English identity is still fairly strong, although it's been thinned out a lot recently.
But there's a big sort of push to reclaim it.
But this is all really interesting to Americans, I find.
Whenever I talk to Americans about it, they'll find it really interesting.
Because you guys aren't like an ancient tribal land, whereas everywhere in the old world is an ancient tribal land.
And so there's much more of a feeling of possession and ownership in the old world.
Whereas in America, people are like, oh, I'm just going to move somewhere else.
And I'm like, what do you mean you're just going to move somewhere else?
Oh, I just fancy living over there.
What do you mean fancy living over there?
Like, what are you talking about?
I'm not going to do that.
I, you know, my, my ancestors are from Wessex and I live in Wessex.
And, you know, God willing, a thousand years time, my ancestors will be still living in Wessex.
I've heard that one of the issues you guys had, and it's not like I heard this from anyone of merit, but that the crown is woke, that your royal family is in favor of these immigration policies and transforming the country the way it was.
It wasn't even a judgment, but it was a piece of advice that some human rights lawyer wrote years ago saying, oh, well, shouldn't Chagos be really with the Mauritians?
And there's nothing to it.
There's no force of law behind it.
It's just that I think that would be nice.
But you're exactly right.
Like, we are moving into an era of geopolitical instability.
Actually securing those things that we actually already have to make sure we can project power around the world to protect ourselves seems wise.
And so obviously the Labor government is like, right, okay, well, if that's going to hurt Britain to give that away, then we'll give that away.
And any excuse to make us weaker and more feeble, that's what this is.
I can make a bunch of predictions about the United States.
You know, it's looking pretty good.
The Trump administration, like I said, they've already begun denaturalizing criminals.
Your citizenship is not guaranteed.
The Big Beautiful bill that Trump calls it, it's got a lot of problems, but it does provide tens of billions for ICE and CBP to begin mass deportations.
So there's a lot of things to be looking forward to with what the Trump administration is doing.
As for the UK, however, I don't follow your guys' news every day, but at least a cursory glance, it doesn't seem like you have that same kind of, you did mention the Restore Britain movement, but is there actually political weight behind any kind of effort to solve these issues for you guys?
Like, the just I love Stephen Miller's uncompromising moral lectures towards the press being like, no, no, no, it's about locking up criminals, about deporting criminals, about making America safe.
And those people who shouldn't be here can just go.
And again, the denaturalization.
Look, man, if it was signed at a stroke for pen that they happened to be naturalized, they'd be unnaturalized at the stroke for pen as well.
You know, sorry, if that's what it takes to make you a citizen, then you're not really a part, you're not from the place, you know what I mean?
And I tell them, because white people are 29% of the population.
And so if all racial groups have an out-group, I'm sorry, have an in-group preference, then you basically can go to 70% of the population and say, hey, here's a racial group you guys don't like.
How about we take their stuff?
And they're going to vote yes.
But what's going to happen is for these white liberals with out-group preference, they're agreeing to it.
If that spreads, or let's say like in the instance of the UK with England, once it gets down to a certain percentage of the population being a minority but overtly oppressed, you will get riots.
And so right now with people being arrested for social media posts and with the percentage base of the white population of England declining, sooner or later, you are going to have people who say, I have nothing left to lose.
The government is crushing me.
They're taking everything from me.
And it will just become race riots.
I think in the U.S., this is going to reverse.
Someone pointed, I can't remember who it was on the show, on our show last night, said that the white classical liberal nations tolerated equality and these liberal values among all races that these other nations do not appreciate.
So it's not about the race of the person necessarily, but when you bring in people from South America or Africa or otherwise, and their views are more tribal and racially based, once they get power, they will eliminate the equality in the system, and then you will get race conflict again.
The best case scenario is that what happens to our countries, and I mean all of our countries, the Anglosphere countries, is, I mean, best case scenario, Lebanon, worst case scenario, South Africa, right?
So things are rough in Lebanon, and they've been through a civil war.
But in South Africa, you have a building genocidal movement that has, there's a million people strong and that results in loads of stochastic terrorism of the most barbaric kind, genuinely the most barbaric kind.
A kind of balkanization like you see in Lebanon would be better than that.
But honestly, I think the South Africanization of our countries is what's going on.
Do you know that in South Africa, they have gates blocking their home, the living room and kitchen from their bedrooms?
So when you go into your property, you open up a gate and lock it, and it's got probably spikes or electrical wire or something.
Then you go in your house and when you're going to bed, you go through your bedroom gate and lock the gate to your bedrooms because it is so common that they bypass the outer gate and break into the house.
They had to put gates around their bedrooms where they sleep.
But this Zoran guy, what he's doing is an explicitly South African policy, where it's affirmative action for the majority in New York against the minority who honestly, I just don't think deserve it.
That's the fundamental issue that comes all this.
And the question is, well, again, it comes back to the kind of jurisdiction, because in South Africa, there are lots of black people who just feel that they have complete jurisdiction over the country.
It's not a rainbow nation.
It's a black nation with an occupying white minority.
And that's what Zohan is putting across when he says, we're just going to tax the white people because they're richer, right?
So the jurisdiction isn't an integrated shared one between a plurality of communities.
It's the non-white community having jurisdiction over the white community.
And that's what people can feel is happening in all of these countries.
They can feel it.
And frankly, it's the dignity of their own sort of collective sense of self that is under attack with all of this.
And this is what the Southport riots were about.
It's like, look, we know the country isn't being run for us.
And we want a country that's being run for us.
Because people have got to remember, all of the immigrants who come in, they all have countries of their own that are run for them.
They all have these countries.
And you can say, yeah, but look at them.
Like there was a Democrat the other day who said, yeah, but it's not safe to send people back to Haiti.
It's like, okay, but whose fault is that?
Like that's their problem.
And if you want, we can send a governor maybe, send like, you know, 5,000 men, send a governor, set up a task force, impose colonial rule on them if it makes it safer for them to live there.
But it's not that we have to take them all in as refugees.
That's why I liked the movie Black Panther, where it was a tribal country where the right to rule was trial by combat among only the men in the regal line.
We don't do that here.
But also, when T'Chala said, if we open up our country to refugees, we bring their problems in with us.
So anyway, I mean, I don't know what the message of the movie is supposed to be.
You described it as Adolf Hitler versus Richard Spencer, I believe, which was funny.
