Jules Jones dissects Trump’s second-term push to expose systemic corruption, from $3B Harvard grant redirection and FBI Director Comey’s alleged treason to Biden’s "auto-pen" fraud (18 USC 471/1503) and USAID’s $93B unaccounted spending. She ties NPR’s taxpayer lawsuit to liberal propaganda, RFK Jr.’s Big Pharma defunding plan, and Judge Timothy Rafe’s tariff ruling—where his wife’s Prudential ties allegedly conflicted with a 2% stock boost. The episode also exposes the Whitmer kidnapping hoax as FBI entrapment, Biden’s election-rigging loan programs, and Trump’s EO 14248 tightening voter ID laws amid California’s 30% ineligible registrations, framing his 52% approval as proof of a "crime-exposing" mandate. [Automatically generated summary]
My name is Jules Jones, and on Saturdays, I go through the biggest political stories of the week.
If you are interested in news and politics, I recommend you follow our channel.
I throw a tea party every Saturday at 3 o'clock p.m. Eastern Time.
I also encourage you to visit my website, JulesJonesLive.com, for updates.
It is so good to be back with you all.
My goodness, it has been quite a ride, has it not?
I mean, really, never a dull moment with President Trump doing what he does best, steering the nation back on track after a disastrous four years.
But here we go.
You are looking at a live feed from Washington, D.C., a city fueled by power, ambition, and just the right amount of smugness to keep things spicy.
The message from the Capitol?
If you've held a top government gig, congrats.
You've officially joined the Untouchables Club.
The perks, a ghost-written memoir no one will read, a cushy cable news gig where you just nod sagely at nothing, and a backstage pass for your inevitable comeback tour.
Party lines, please.
Once you're in, you're VIP for life.
But let's not pretend we don't see the glow up.
The same folks who once shook hands at your local pancake breakfast and swore to fight for the people suddenly morph into this political chameleon faster than you can say re-election campaign.
Governing?
It's empire time, baby.
Seriously, that's what they're building.
Empires.
Welcome to the world of Me the Career over We the People.
That air of invincibility, though, it's starting to feel more like a cheap knockoff.
The 2018 midterm sent a clear message.
Voters are done with the usual DC song and dance.
Democrats swiped 40 seats in the House, ending the Republican eight-year reign and putting a giant roadblock in the way of Trump's agenda.
The GOP's momentum on thin ice.
And unlike the political elite, voters have receipts.
They'll remember who fumbled the ball.
So to Washington's power players, don't get too cozy in your leather chairs.
The tides are shifting and you might want to start brushing up on your pancake flipping skills.
Business as usual isn't cutting it anymore.
Well, it was really nice to take a long weekend for Memorial Day, but it is always fantastic to be back with all of you.
I hope you all had a pleasant and restful time last weekend.
I certainly missed you.
The pace of the news cycle didn't exactly slow down over the break, and it continued right through this week.
I'm serious, just trying to keep up with this stuff has been nearly impossible.
With trade deals, tariffs, and you had ceasefire negotiations and more.
Crimes and Subversion Discussed00:06:59
I mean, it was something every single minute.
In addition to President Trump's many accomplishments, there is a growing volume of crime that is being uncovered by all of President Trump's activities.
At the top of the list is criminal and perhaps treasonous cover-up of Joe Biden's cognitive state and, of course, the enormous amount of waste, fraud, and abuse uncovered by Doge.
But there is much more than just that.
During today's show, we'll be talking about crimes in the areas of fraud, lawfare, and judicial tyranny, subversion of America, and direct subversion of President Trump.
That's why we named today's show Trump Exposing Crimes.
There is plenty to talk about.
The good news is that the people are awake and wise to all of this criminality now.
Despite all the dirty tricks, lawfare, and outright criminal behavior, President Trump's approval ratings remain high, and a majority of the country feels this country is on the right track.
Congress would be wise to pay close attention to this because, in the eyes of the people, President Trump's approval rating is many times higher than that of Congress, which wallows at about 10 to 13 percent.
If the people's opinion of Congress remains low, it's their own fault.
They are clinging to a corrupt business-as-usual model, and so far, the Republican majorities in both the House and the Senate show absolutely no sense of urgency.
Will Congress be wise enough to listen to the voice of the people?
Indications are they will not.
Through the summer months of June, July, and August, Congress plans to work only 26 days.
For those of us who work normal jobs and for those who work just keeping score, there are 63 weekdays, workdays in June, July, and August.
That means Congress will only work 41% of the available weekday workdays.
Could you work 41% of the time and get paid for it?
Perhaps Congress should be paid only 41% of their salary over the summer.
In the past, this probably would not have received much attention, but you, the people, are awake now.
You see how corrupt and biased the mainstream media is, and you're receiving your news from many new sources.
You won't be fooled this time.
So, as we discuss the criminality which is being exposed by President Trump, and as we witness the judicial tyranny being exercised by activist leftist judges, let's not leave out our lazy, worthless Congress, which consistently ignores the voice of the people.
For many of them facing primaries, ignoring the people will be a career-ending mistake.
I can't wait to get started.
But before we get into all of that, Trump exposing crimes, we'll begin today's show with our four starter segments: our top news story countdown for the week, which takes a more tongue-in-cheek approach to our mostly wonderful news stories.
We'll review our current breaking news and ex-news for the day, our what is wrong with these people, spoiler alert, plenty.
That news segment, which I am totally enjoying because there is plenty wrong with these people, showing how the left has dumbed down our society.
Then we will look at our In Case You Missed It segment, which provides updates on stories from past shows.
I love having all of you here at 3 p.m. each Saturday.
But if there is some reason you can't be here or if you can't make it, all you have to do is watch them later.
You can check them out on our website or on any of our channels.
They're all there.
You can go to julesjoneslive.com and find all of the platforms where you can view this show, even the past episodes that are archived.
As always, a special thank you to all of our Rumble refugees for finding your way to live stream platforms, which can also be found on our website.
I truly appreciate you.
Then we'll spill the tea with this week's show, Trump Exposing Crime.
Following that, I'll dish up some rumors from online chatter that you will not want to miss in our Daily Dish segment.
Then finally, we'll cover this week's question of the day, where you get to provide your answers in the show comments.
But for now, settle in, get comfortable with your beverage of choice as we begin this week's political rendezvous.
Let's spill some tea and maybe a little bit of blackout coffee using the code CAT for 20% off.
shall we?
We are going to start off strong with our top news stories of the week.
Coming in at number 10.
President Trump threatens to take $3 billion of grant money from Harvard and give it to trade schools across the U.S. Harvard thinks it's entitled to our tax dollars.
Harvard is wrong, and now Harvard is panicking.
And at nine, my goodness, number nine, shouldn't be any surprise to any of you that there was another low blow from former FBI director James Comey, who issued a nasty threat to MAGA Nation days after Trump assassination post.
The surprising thing about crooked cop Comey is that it's not only that he's pompous, a sanctimonious creep.
Low Blow from Comey00:03:57
We all knew that.
Okay, that's already in the books.
The most disturbing thing is, is that the ease in which he lies with a straight face.
He is a traitor and he belongs in prison, but nothing has been done to date.
How can that be?
Is he untouchable?
Number eight, we've got for the first time in a Ras Musson polling history, a majority of Americans say that U.S. is on the right track.
Despite the nonsense being spewed by the lamestream media, Democrats, and hordes of psychotic liberals, a majority of the country knows the truth and knows that President Trump is on the right track.
In it number seven, Trump offers Canada a discount on the Golden Dome system if they become the 51st state.
How nice of him.
Nobody trolls like President Trump.
He has the entire state of Canada wondering whether he's serious or not.
In it number six, President Trump goes there.
He says whoever used Biden's auto pen usurped the power of the presidency.
As direct as that statement was, it's actually an understatement.
Yes, they usurped the power of the presidency, but that is treason and it should be treated as such.
In it five, alive at five.
Democrats are tired of the party being run by Obama people.
Bloom may be falling off the rose.
You know what?
We're sick of Obama people running the Democrat Party too.
Finally, something upon which we agree.
In it number four, Dan Bongino announces discovery of an entire room full of mishandled and hidden evidence from Comey's FBI.
Wait until you read this stuff that's coming out.
You're going to be stunned.
Oh, we're very prepared to be stunned, Dan.
We're waiting to be stunned by the Epstein client list, by the Diddy list, by the J6 pipe bomber, by the J6 setup details, or by Comey's mishandled evidence.
We're ready, Dan.
Release something.
In it number three, Trump scores another legal win in a lawsuit against the New York Slimes and Washington Compost.
In this case, against Pulitzer Board and their award for fake news reporting.
President Trump never stops fighting.
The Pulitzer Board completely disgraced itself, and these illegitimate awards should be rescinded.
Fake news should not be rewarded.
In it number two, Hawaii becomes the first state to introduce a climate change tax on visitors.
If they had called it the Save the Pineapples tax, it might have been less controversial.
But climate change?
No, we shouldn't be taxed on a hoax.
And our number one biggest story for the week.
Caroline Levitt goes off on rogue judges who ruled against Trump tariffs, calls on SCOTUS to put an end to the lawless activist judges who abuse their judicial power to usurp the presidency.
This is our number one story this week because this was exactly what needed to be said and it should be repeated every day.
We are witnessing judicial tyranny at an unprecedented level and it must be stopped.
No one voted for these partisan political appointees and they should never usurp the authority of President Trump who was duly elected by the people.
Covering This Week's News00:06:42
And there you have it.
Our top news stories for the week.
I love that because you know what?
You actually are able to cover so much of what actually happened this week.
And with the way it goes, if you just blink an eye, you miss something.
All right, so we are going to head right on into our ex-channel and we're going to start with the question of the day, but we got to head on over there first.
So much happening.
And then if you just go to the beach and you're like, hey, I want to just, you know, stay away from politics for a couple of days, right?
I want to clear my blank, my brain.
You wonder what happened when you come back.
And most of us aren't away from it for very long at all.
But that's exactly what happened to me.
I was having a glorious time talking about everything besides politics.
But you know what?
It didn't slow down President Trump.
He just kept on going.
And it's so cool to watch all of the things that he is doing.
And when you do take a break, you can appreciate it even more if that's possible.
All right, so I did two questions this week for you all.
And one, because it wasn't a very good question.
That's the real, that's the truth of the matter.
The way it was worded really wasn't that good.
And thank you.
I appreciate all of you in chat for letting me know, hey, you know what?
It can't go into the big, beautiful bill anyway.
But you get the gist of the question.
And so I kept it up there so that I could respond in kind and also give you all shout outs at the end.
So the question was, poorly worded, should Doge cuts be permanent in the Big Beautiful Bill?
Well, it apparently cannot be in the Big Beautiful bill, but the answers here were spectacular.
Everybody agrees that they should be permanent, even though they cannot get into that bill.
So I'm going to read you a couple of the responses.
Absolutely yes, says Allison Mahoney, and that's at Mahoney3 Allison.
But she also says it must be codified into the law to effect real change.
It will protect it from future administration that may want to revoke it.
Camaga at Mo Borough says yes.
And then you've got Talk Randomness at Talk Randomness.
Absolutely.
At Bobcat 19560 says yes.
At Cat Mom Florida, yes, Monday would be a great day for that.
But then you have a lot of people that really came in and they said, hey, it can't be.
The BBB is a reconciliation bill.
And cuts like that are not allowed.
But three Doge cuts go in next week.
Let's see if Congress has heard how upset we are with them and if they can get these things passed.
But the majority of this particular question, oh yeah, everybody's on board.
We want this to be permanent.
And I'm not tired of saying how I truly feel.
Thank God, and I mean that, for Elon Musk and all of the work that he has done exposing the corruption in the government.
I realize, and as do all of you, how he really put himself on the line out there.
And I am forever grateful.
I mean, with his companies, with what he has exposed, he is now a target of the left, and that's not going to go away anytime soon, if ever.
He's a hero in my mind.
And I'm just so grateful for the work that he and President Trump and President Trump's administration are doing.
It is a tough job up there.
And they are just doing beautifully trying to get things done for us.
So in our bonus question, which I'm going to play, now that we got through the first one, I'll save until the end and would love to hear your response.
here is the question of the day it's time for today's question of the day Do you agree with Trump's ban on Harvard's ability to enroll foreign students?
Yes or no?
Share your thoughts in the comments.
Your insights might be featured live on a political rendezvous this Saturday, May 31st at 3 p.m. Eastern Time.
Pick your viewing platform on JulesJonesLive.com.
So that's the question.
And you will have time during this show when we're going through all of this news, which is plenty, by the way, oh my gosh, to answer.
All you have to do is head on over to my ex page at Jules Jones Live.
I also put it on all of the other platforms where we stream this show, which is why I've really been plugging the website.
Because if you don't like one platform or one chat room, you can always visit another.
Not that you wouldn't like them, it's just they're all completely different with different people.
So you now have options, and you're all on the screen so you can find each other in all of the other places where we are streaming.
So the little dot that's next to the person that types something that identifies where they are actually chatting from.
So you know.
All right, so we're going to head on into our news today.
And again, like I said, there is plenty.
Special shout out to all of you that talk about the show that gets the word out on it.
And Patriot Lioness is no exception at Patriot underscore Lioness.
Thank you for introducing the show today.
Really appreciate it.
So how deep does the college indoctrination rabbit hole go?
Well, Harvard students give a standing ovation as their university squares off against Trump in court.
So you can see here, and at Real Beamster, who put out this particular post, notice how indoctrinated people do not support President Trump.
Maybe one day they'll be educated.
So if you were to really replace the word educated with indoctrinated, it tells a story in and of itself.
watch this here they are clapping and carrying on the moment harvard's president received a standing ovation for suing donald trump Okay, that's how they get their kids' attention, right?
Phone Smuggled from North Korea00:03:02
Because all day long for hours on end, this is what they're hammering.
I mean, it's brainwashing.
We're lucky it didn't get to this level here in this country.
I mean, they already had plans for us to have a ministry of truth and everything else.
One can't help but wonder if, given the chance, the left might elevate propaganda to North Korea-level extremes, complete with manuals titled Mastering the Art of Indoctrination.
Crisis averted for now, America.
Talk about a close call.
All right, so here is something wild.
And at Colin Rugg, and make sure you're following all these people, they're great accounts on X.
They truly are.
They've got so much information from all over the world, just interesting stuff.
But at Colin Rugg, he is a great follow.
So the BBC has obtained a follow that phone that was smuggled out of North Korea that edits words North Koreans aren't supposed to use.
This is wild.
All right, North Korea has now adopted smartphones to indoctrinate its citizens.
If a user tries typing a blocked word, the phone will edit it to a word that is acceptable to the North Korean government.
According to the BBC, North Korea is also using youth crackdown squads to patrol the streets in search of people using South Korean slang or styles.
Listen to this.
We've got hold of this phone that was smuggled out of North Korea last year and it shows some of the surprising lengths the regime is now going to to censor information.
North Korea blocks information from outside the country and these phones don't have access to the internet.
But South Korean TV shows are being smuggled over the border to try to show North Koreans how rich South Korea is and how much freedom people have here to try to undermine the regime.
Now Kim Jong-un has banned these shows and from this phone you can see that he's now also blocking people from using popular South Korean words.
Look what happens when I type in the word okpa.
This word literally means older brother in Korean but people here in South Korea now use it as slang to refer to their boyfriends as well.
When I enter it it automatically changes to the word comrade and I get this warning and it says this word can only be used to describe your siblings.
Now look what happens if I type in the word for South Korea which is nampan.
It automatically changes it to puppet state which is what the north calls the south.
In this folder we can see that the phone is taking a screenshot every five minutes or so but the user can't open these files only the authorities can so they can see when people are looking at or sharing things that they're not supposed to.
Unexpected Auto-Corrections00:14:19
Is that not bizarre?
Is that not the wildest thing?
Well we've had this happen in this country already when they were spying on our DMs and our social media and everything else and that was truly the direction we were headed.
Again I cannot say it enough.
Thank God for President Trump truly.
And when I say we dodged a bullet we absolutely did.
We would not have recognized this country.
So we've got one from the one and only Katur 2, who you all know I have a show with Monday through Friday at 3 o'clock p.m. Eastern Time on these same channels.
And here he is calling it out for what it is.
So we're speaking of Lady Lindsay sedition.
You've got Benny Johnson who put this one out.
Senator Lady Lindsay Graham Crackers just threatened China with a 500% tariff if they continue buying Russian oil.
Well you know yesterday this guy, he went on over and he met with of course Zelensky.
He spent all of this time over there.
A lot of people were calling him out for it, of course, and as they should, because here he is acting on behalf, like he is some kind, like he's a spokesman for the president of the United States.
And he's over here with stolen valor guy, right?
Blumenthal.
So this is who this cat likes to cat around with.
Here he is speaking his game that Putin's been playing is about to change.
He's going to be hit and hit hard by the United States when it comes to sanctions.
China, the game you're playing with Russia is about to change.
If you keep buying cheap Russian oil to fuel Putin's war machine, there will be a 500% tariff on all of your products coming into the United States.
He doesn't understand what 82 senators coming together from both sides of the aisle mean in terms of practical import.
And these sanctions will cripple his economy.
They will be bone-crushing to a nation that is basically, as one of our colleagues once said, a gas station with nuclear arms.
He has one resource, and we are going to throttle that resource as a goodness sake, stolen valor at its best right here with Blumenthal.
And you know, that's one thing the lamestream media always does not talk about is all of the history of these two.
They just will never call them out because they're on their side.
And I'll tell you one thing: President Trump should absolutely look at this graham cracker.
We can get rid of this guy.
We can primary him.
No problem.
He's one of the ones that almost got primaried last time.
But of course, you've got all kinds of people that are working on both sides to make sure that some of these people stay up there because they're the ones that are doing the bidding.
And really, I feel like blackmail is a huge problem in our government.
No telling what they have on Lady Lindsay.
I mean, you can look at the guy.
You can tell.
There's something not quite right there that he definitely doesn't want out.
So he's doing the bidding like he always does.
He's not going to change.
We need somebody that is going to be out there fighting for us.
No question.
There are so many people in this government that we have got to primary in order to get the real work done.
So President Trump's trolling game is on another level.
He's practically turned it into an art form.
Say what you will, but he's clearly having the time of his life.
This was hilarious to watch.
Only President Trump would make the fake news watch their own fake news networks, admitting Trump is an economic genius.
And that is precisely what he did.
I laughed so hard when I saw this clip because he just is having more fun than anybody else.
Here we go.
From, you know, Joe Kiernan and Rick Santelli.
This just came out and we'll just play that for a second.
Personal income is up eight tenths, up eight tenths of a percent.
That is almost triple the expectations.
So I'll tell you that the income, the income numbers, really for the first four months of the year, they're stellar.
They're really stellar.
I mean, I could go back and look at the first four months of many different years.
Really very strong numbers.
And you're right.
This administration is criticized for just about everything under the sun.
I've never ever in my lifetime had glimpses into the politics of an administration in the form of transparency like this one.
Why don't we be, you know, give credit where credit is due?
I also saw income really shooting.
I also thought everybody was going to get one last order of imports that were going to be tariffed and they were loading up on things.
How the hell did that already fix the trade or not fix it, but to cut it in half?
That's crazy.
So there wasn't a lot of front loading of things that they needed before the tariffs hit?
Yeah, I'll tell you what, it really does call into question some of the conventional wisdoms.
And, you know, it's going to be interesting to see what happens next month when we get this number or we see some of the other numbers like current accounts, see how they fared.
Because I don't know.
I've been watching these numbers a long time.
I don't think I've ever seen the trade depth stick cut in half in one month.
Not bad.
Not bad.
Come on, guys.
Nobody is having as much fun as President Trump is.
There is no question about it.
And that was a brilliant thing to have a liberal channel and all of the different things that they are saying to have them reminded about what they're actually saying on their networks because you can't deny what President Trump is doing.
He is doing absolutely amazing things.
And I am so proud he is our president.
There is no one that even comes close.
Well, Insurrection Barbie at Defiantly Free, she has one for the book.
She says, recent homeland security data found that of the 565,000 foreign students slated to leave in fiscal 2023, some 50,000 stayed instead, violating their visa requirements.
Many of them were from China.
Imagine that.
Well, that's going to make life a little bit difficult on China because, you know, we have got Chinese all over people that are here that are in our government or in our corporations and they are buying up properties and they're in all levels of government.
So with tensions rising, it's safe to say that China won't respond lightly to the loss of its infiltrators and spies.
This is only the beginning.
I expect to see some fallout from this because they've been able to work, act freely here in the United States.
No question.
So Wendy Patterson, she put out this particular post.
This is going to make a lot of you mad.
I know it's a Saturday and all, but business as usual.
You've got at Wall Street Mav who posted that Speaker Johnson says that the House is eager to pass a 9.4 bill recessions package.
It includes Doge cuts, which sounds great on the face, right?
Until you hear what Wendy has to say.
$9.4 billion out of $7 trillion.
That means the USAID, whose budget is $49.9 billion per year, will only receive $49 billion per year.
Is that what you elected Trump to do?
At Russ Vault, you should be fired too.
Telling you, social media is quite a weapon, and we are using it wisely, and we're using it well.
So we've got one for the books here.
President Trump, and he should be proud.
Personal income is climbing with the biggest increase since May 2021 and four months of steady growth, plus 0.6% in January, plus 0.7% in February, plus 0.5% in March, and plus 0.8% in April.
This reflects a strong economy fueled by low taxes, deregulation, and economic freedom.
The media might not highlight it, but the numbers speak for themselves.
Momentum is building and the rebound is real.
And that's why you're hearing all of these hosts saying, hey, you know, it's about time we start giving credit.
We don't want to end up like fake Yapper over there who has to write a book and try to say, hey, no, I'm ready to tell the truth now after they lied to us for years.
They're just trying to do it a little bit more subtly, right?
I mean, they just don't want you to actually see what's going on.
They're just going to try to make it over to the right and start reporting the news all of a sudden and gain that trust that way because it's just not working for fake Yapper.
All right, boom.
You've got President Trump last night.
This was incredible.
Loved this rally.
You have U.S. steel workers.
They went nuclear after Trump announced that they will receive a $5,000 bonus as part of the new deal he just negotiated.
There will be no layoffs and no outsourcing whatsoever.
And every U.S. steel worker will soon receive a well-deserved $5,000 bonus.
Most importantly, U.S. steel will continue to be controlled by the USA.
That's life-changing money for these guys, as you all know.
Incredible.
He's just doing things that he promised he was going to do.
So he says in a post, he says, it is my great honor to raise the tariffs on steel and aluminum from 25% to 50% effective Wednesday, June 4th.
Our steel and aluminum industries are coming back like never before.
This will be yet another big jolt of great news for our wonderful steel and aluminum workers.
Make America great again.
That's our president.
So then we've got Harry Inton at Forecaster Inton who is saying the quiet part out loud.
A lot of Americans agree with Trump.
Higher education needs a kick in the rear.
Those with high confidence in higher education, it has collapsed 57% in 2015 to 36% now.
68 say that higher ed is on the wrong track.
Also, a plurality of Americans and the GOP agree that these college liberal bias, we're not interested in it.
It's more of an indoctrination.
And you can see it.
It was on display a little bit earlier in this particular segment where you have all of Harvard that's so thrilled that Harvard will be taking President Trump to court.
Sad situation because so many people, I mean, education is a great thing if it's handled properly.
But when it turns into indoctrination instead of education, we all suffer.
And that's what's been going on in the college campuses.
So here we go.
I think going into this, I think a lot of Americans thought that higher ed needed a nice kick in the rear end.
What am I talking about here?
Well, why don't we take a look at high confidence in higher education?
You go back a decade ago, 57% of Americans had high confidence in higher education.
Look at where we are now.
That number has plummeted, plummeted as of last year down to 36%.
We're talking about a 36-point drop among Republicans specifically.
Get this.
68% of Americans said that higher education was on the wrong track.
So, it's a question of whether or not people agree with Trump's tactics, but they definitely agree with him on the idea that there is a problem with higher ed overall.
One thing you've heard from President Trump and many Republican allies for quite some time is accusing colleges and universities across the country of not being a friendly place for conservatives, if you will.
How do the American public feel?
Yeah, so you know, do colleges have a liberal bias?
I think that's really the question here.
And what we see in polling after polling after polling is that the plurality say yes.
Overall, look at that.
45% of Americans overall agree with the idea that colleges have a liberal bias, just 24% disagree with that idea.
Look among Republicans.
Hello.
67% of Republicans agree that colleges have a liberal bias.
This is why Donald Trump is so emphatic and so wanting to take on this fight because he knows that Republicans hate universities, hate the administrations, believe they have a liberal bias.
And in fact, the plurality of Americans overall agree with the idea, agree with Donald Trump, that colleges are, in fact, a place where bias reigns.
On President Trump targeting international students, are you seeing an impact of this?
I mean, obviously, it's early on, but so far?
Yeah, there's definitely been an impact on it.
What are we talking about?
So, webpage views for university courses from potential students abroad, right?
This is from study portals.
Get this: it is down 50% from potential international students from January 5th to the end of April.
So, a lot of potential international students who might be saying, Hey, in the past, I might want to come to America, saying, No, at this particular point, maybe I'm going to look elsewhere.
Maybe I'm going to look at the United Kingdom, for example, because in the United States, we don't feel welcome.
NPR's Bono on Money Laundering00:11:48
Courtesy, Harry, thank you so much.
Thank you.
And that will just make room for Americans in these colleges, will it not?
As long as they're not being indoctrinated, as long as we get a handle on all of that.
But yes, they are having to report what the truth of the matter is, and that is that people agree that all you have got is a liberal cesspool in all of these universities, especially the Ivy Leagues.
We hope that he doesn't just stop with Harvard.
I hope that he continues on and starts getting this whole thing figured out.
Jackie, just absolutely, thank you so much.
I appreciate this video that she did today to introduce the show at Jackie 1321 underscore 67.
I can play this one, but I can't play Hobbits because it has music attached to it, which I reposted yesterday, and to get everybody psyched for this show.
But I want to play this one for you because it is just so cute.
And it's me and Cat Turt, of course.
And we're fishing.
Now, all right, let me just, one for the records.
I'm not a fisherman, okay?
I have no skill there.
All right.
I may enjoy throwing a poll in every once in a while, but that's not really my forte.
But I'm there for the ride, and I'm the best cheerleader you can ever imagine, but I do not bait my own hooks.
No, thanks.
Thank you.
Here we go.
Happy Saturday, everyone.
Don't miss my great friend, Jules Jones, today at 3 p.m. Eastern for a political rendezvous.
She will be discussing me, your favorite president, and all the crime we are exposing.
Make America safe again.
Happy Saturday.
That's exactly right.
Happy Saturday, Jims.
Seriously, I did miss you last week.
It felt like forever.
It really did.
It was like, oh my gosh, we really took a break here.
But it was definitely needed and it was definitely deserved.
And I hope that you all had a great time as well.
All right.
So now we're going to go into our next segment, which is what is wrong with these people.
Spoiler alert, plenty.
NPR, they sue the Trump administration on the First Amendment grounds.
Do they think they have a right to tax dollars?
Of course they do.
Yes, everyone thinks that they deserve our money for whatever reason.
They're so used to getting it.
And that is why another reason why they act the way they do.
So earlier this month, you've got Trump, who signed an executive order ending the taxpayer subsidization of national public radio.
Conservatives have been calling for this for years.
I mean, why should we be forced to subsidize a radio network that does nothing but bash us on a regular basis?
So now NPR is suing the Trump administration, claiming that their First Amendment rights are being violated.
How does that work exactly?
Well, no one is saying they can't speak.
It's just about the taxpayer funding.
Do the folks at NPR think that they have a constitutional right to taxpayer funding?
Apparently, they do.
What is wrong with these people?
Well, they've been bought for a long time and they have been rewarded.
They even have their own awards and everything else where they give themselves a big pat on the back.
They get all of these different seating assignments where they can have front row seats.
I mean, believe me, the rewards are plenty.
When that money goes, so will a lot of these perks.
And this administration is determined to level the playing field, and rightfully so.
It's way overdue.
So here you've got Congressman Brandon Gill who says NPR has a right to free speech.
It just doesn't have a right to our taxpayer dollars, which I completely agree with.
Tom Cotton even weighed in.
He says it is outrageous that NPR believes it is entitled to your tax dollars.
NPR is a liberal propaganda network and it shouldn't get a penny from taxpayers.
Yeah.
So then in more news, of course, I've got all kinds.
I mean, this whole thing has been so fun.
All right.
So the first one came when you had Bono, who had an interview.
It was fun with Rogan.
I don't know.
I didn't watch the entire episode, but just a few of the clips.
Bono says 300,000 people have already died from this hard cut of USAID.
You want to talk about what is wrong with these people?
This is a perfect example.
Rogan said it was a money laundering operation.
Billions of dollars are missing.
Elon Musk said if any of this was done by a public company, the company would be delisted and the executives would be in prison.
So what's wrong with this guy?
I do not know, but you know he's a big figurehead of the left.
Here's the exchange.
Just recent report.
It's not proven, but the surveillance enough suggests 300,000 people have already died from just this cutoff, this hard cut of USAID.
So this food rotting in boats, in warehouses.
There is, this will fuck you off.
You will not be happy.
No American will.
But there is, I think it's 50,000 tons of food that are stored in Djibouti, South Africa, Dubai, and wait for it.
Houston, Texas.
And that is rotting rather than going to Gaza, rather than going to Sudan, because the people who know the codes are for the warehouse, are fired.
They're gone.
And so this, I don't know, I just, what do you think?
What is that?
That's not America, is it?
Well, they're throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Right.
Right.
This is the problem.
The problem is for sure there have been a lot of organizations that do tremendous good all throughout the world.
Also, for sure, it was a money laundering operation.
For sure, there was no oversight.
For sure, billions of dollars are missing.
In fact, trillions that are unaccounted for, that were sent off into various, they don't even know where because there's no receipts.
The way Elon Musk described it, he said if any of this was done by a public company, the company would be delisted and the executives would be in prison.
But in the United States, this is standard.
When Biden left office, when it was clear that Trump won, in the 73 days, they spent $93 billion from the Department of Energy on just radical loans, just throwing money into places.
And there's no oversight, no receipts.
Like the whole thing is, there's a lot of fraud, a lot of money laundering.
I mean, where have these people been?
Honestly, it's like they live in a bubble and they have no idea other than what people tell them on the left to believe.
I mean, he honestly looked as if he truly believed that that was happening.
Well, Elon had to weigh in on all of this.
And at Cat Tur 2, he captured it.
Elon Musk calls out low IQ moron bono for being an idiot and a liar.
Typical cat.
You have Mike Bence at Mike Benz Cyber who says these USAID numbers are effing faker than their COVID numbers.
Sorry, I don't cuss.
And I apologize for the last video.
I did not know that there was going to be a drop of that sort.
But, you know, I always can fix that on my end and relabel the show explicit.
Sorry if you have kids in the car.
Anyway, so about this whole bono thing, well, Elon Musk, he had to weigh in.
And he said, he's such a liar, idiot.
Zero people have died.
Is he a liar or does he just not know?
Does he just spew whatever it is that people tell him?
Honestly, you can't tell.
I don't know.
I don't know.
But I do know one thing.
At Spitfire at Dog Right Girl, fabulous, another fabulous account.
She says, okay, Miss Ghetto, may have just taken over the reins from Kamala.
This is some of the worst word salad I've ever heard.
And why is she looking up at the ceiling?
Listen to this nonsense.
What is the Democrat playbook for the midterms?
Is it blaming Trump or is it talking about kitchen table issues?
You act like I got the playbook.
Listen, we, I mean, the winning playbook, I think, of Rawl is just communication and education.
I think that you can talk about kitchen table issues all you want to, but it comes down to actually having a rapport and making sure that people actually understand what it is that you're talking about.
I don't think that we fail to talk about kitchen table issues, but basically Trump was simple and lied, right?
Like he said, hey, the price of eggs are high.
I'm going to reduce it on day one.
It was a very simple message.
It was a lie.
We're going down now.
I mean, after they went up through the roof, I mean, yeah, like, let's be clear.
And honestly, they may be down for the second, but again, having people be educated about what it is that the FDA does and talking about things such as the bird flu and talking about if you have less birds because they are sick, then that's less eggs.
But the demand is still the same, then the price goes up.
Like, we have to make sure we do education.
One of the other issues that I think we had is that people didn't understand that the global pandemic was the cause of our inflation.
They were like, oh, everything's high.
And they just said, well, that's the person that's in office instead of actually having this global conversation.
Or one of the things that he was honest about is that he actually was going to institute tariffs.
The problem was people didn't understand exactly what a tariff was because he was able to say, you know what?
And it's going to be those foreign countries that pay for the tariffs.
So everybody's like, all right, cool.
Like, but that's not the case.
And so I think that our win is in the education.
I think it is why I place an emphasis on making sure that we can do things such as our teletown halls.
While I place an emphasis on coming in and having an actual dialogue with my seniors, because I do want to make sure that they understand what's going on and I want to break it down into the simplest terms that I can because some of this can be really, really complicated.
But I think our win is in our education and our constant communication.
So there you have it, everyone.
That's Congresswoman Jasmine Kroc of You Can Fill in the Blank.
Yeah.
So I heard that that was a little loud for some.
I'm sorry.
I don't control the volume.
And when I do see it, when I see your comments, as in between, I get to see you in chat and see what a wonderful time you're having because I can, I'm always jealous.
But anyway, that was a little loud.
I apologize.
Pharma Ads and Silence00:07:30
I don't record them.
Sometimes I'm able to control it a little bit.
Sometimes I'm not.
That one I was.
So fortunately.
Anyway, that's what we have with the Democrat Party.
I don't know how they're even a party anymore.
I think they're hanging on by a thread, truly.
And if we had Republicans with a spine, we would go ahead and just take over and do incredible things.
But you know what?
They're not going to do it.
I'm just afraid they're not going to do it.
Okay, so we are going to move right on into our In Case You Missed It segment, which is where we catch up on all of the different segments.
If you miss something from one of our other shows and catch up on some of the news there, the first one, and I really think that a lot of people were very skeptical at first, but RFK Jr. is just going, he is one of those, he's like the dark horse, right?
I mean, he is doing things.
He knows exactly which moves need to be made because he's lived out there with all of us and he's been watching what's been going on with big pharmaceutical companies.
This is amazing.
So this article, it originally appeared on Vigilant Fox and it was republished with permission by the Gateway Pundit, so everyone knows.
But he had an interview and he sat down.
This is HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
He sat down with the human biologist and biohacker Gary Brecca to outline his bold new plan to shift the medical system from one that serves big pharma to one that actually serves the people.
During the interview, you had Kennedy who shared what some may call a conspiracy theory, but it offered a compelling explanation for why TV News suddenly stopped criticizing the pharmaceutical industry.
He went on to say 20 years ago that it wasn't uncommon to see news segments questioning safety or effectiveness of vaccines, but then it all went quiet.
According to Kennedy, that silence was bought with pharmaceutical ad dollars.
That's right.
That's why you're seeing them now and why the change is so prevalent and in your face.
You're seeing it on late night TV, sponsored by Pfizer, from the royal wedding to a baseball game brought to you by Pfizer.
Well, when the money and the power is involved to that degree, you have all of these newscasters who have changed their tunes.
I mean, you have even late night TV hosts that are dressing up in needles, like singing tunes.
What is actually going on?
Well, big pharma doesn't just advertise on TV news.
They want to control the content completely.
He revealed that Fox News founder Roger Ailes once told him that 75% of even evening news and ad revenue came from pharmaceutical companies.
So when you see fake Yapper on CNN, his paycheck may say CNN, but the money is coming from Pfizer and other pharmaceutical giants flooding the airwaves with ads.
And this is something that is right there.
And they are going to toe the line.
They're going to frighten us all about infectious diseases.
They're going to get everybody really nervous because that's what's going to get people to buy.
They are not giving us real news.
They're not asking the questions they should be asking.
There's no skepticism.
It's just buy this, do this, and live in fear.
20 years ago, they used to say, yeah, there's problems with a vaccine or other drugs.
Well, they don't do that today.
All of a sudden, you get a monotone list of all the side effects that could possibly happen that basically puts you to sleep, glosses you over, and you don't retain any of it, except for a few words that says when they say the word death.
And you may snap out of that coma.
I don't know.
It's almost like they try to hypnotize you or something.
So RFK Jr., he took a sledgehammer to Big Pharma with two devastating announcements.
He ended the government's blanket recommendation for the COVID shot, but that was the first blow.
Now he's going after Big Pharma's dominance altogether, and they are not ready for it.
It's going to be huge.
You're going to see something completely changed when you're watching network television.
So in this whole interview, he's talking about the fact that we're paying for the ads and we're also paying for the product.
What he meant is that taxpayers are getting hit twice.
We're footing the bill for the drugs themselves through Medicare, Medicaid, and other government programs.
Then on top of that, the pharmaceutical companies, they write off the cost of their TV ads as a business expense and it reduces their tax bill.
So not only are taxpayers footing the bill for the product, we're also subsidizing the ad campaigns that have been hijacked with the news industry.
And then they're silencing investigations and burying the truth about Big Pharma's wrongdoing.
I mean, why would these journalists cover something like that when they're the ones that are paying them?
No.
So then RFK Jr. put every medical journal bought off by Big Pharma on notice.
He said the Lancet New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, and all those other journals, because they're corrupt.
He basically made it clear their reign as the premier voices in medical science is coming to an end.
He said that, and he pointed the warning from Dr. Marcia Angel, the former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, who declared no longer a science journal.
Instead, she called it a vessel for pharmaceutical propaganda.
So what he said is, look, we're shaking up the status quo quo.
We're cutting ties with these captured publications and building something better.
We're going to stop NIH scientists from publishing there.
And we're going to create our own journals in health in each of the institutions.
He also added that these new government-backed journals will become the preeminent journals in the world because they'll be grounded in real science, not corporate spin.
If you get NIH funding, Kennedy said, it is anointing you as a good, legitimate scientist.
This has got them on their heels.
The second announcement dropped when Kennedy said, we're going to end the war at the FDA against alternative medicine.
That includes stem cells and chelating drugs, vitamins, peptides, anything that is not going to make big pharma rich.
Kennedy also revealed that he had to travel all the way to Antiqua in the Caribbean just to receive stem cell treatment for his throat.
He went on to say, they helped me enormously, but I shouldn't have to leave the country to get them.
Thomas And Nitromethane00:15:24
This is huge for us.
Kennedy believes that Americans should have the right to try experimental drugs and that the government should respect their intelligence because no American should have to leave the country to access healing and no government should stand between the people and the treatment so that could save their lives.
I mean, it's a hello duh.
So this was a fantastic interview.
It absolutely tells you exactly what he's planning on doing.
And it's remarkable.
It's wonderful.
It's a hello to most of us, like, of course, right?
I mean, that's how it should be.
But it hasn't been.
So this is really, this is going to be a great move.
He's doing great things.
We have new information on the Trump shooter.
Yeah, that's right.
New information.
It's just sort of been trickling out.
Well, Thomas Crooks was ordering bomb material that could take down an entire building.
This is according to an estimate, right?
So it's been the better part of a year since Thomas Crooks tried to assassinate now President Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania.
And we're somehow just learning that he attempted to acquire explosives that could, depending on how they were used, take down an entire building.
Now, this is going to make you mad.
When we talk about Pravda and propaganda, the news is the best.
They are masters at it.
And that's why a lot of them, and President Trump, is now playing this stuff in front of them.
Because every once in a while, they tell the truth, but people are seeing through it.
They are seeing through all of these lies when it doesn't matter if it's in print or whether it's on the airwaves.
Because this is what the big story here is that he could have taken down buildings with this stuff.
But that's not what they were reporting.
The revelation came as part of CBS News last week.
The Trump shooter, Thomas Crooks, emails revealed a student dreaming of a bright future and contemplating a violent attack.
I mean, you've got to love this order, right?
So you have the CBS news writers with one of those openly just features that a writer could love, only a writer could love, that he had a lot on his mind in January 2024.
The 20-year-old who six months later would open fire at President Trump at a Pennsylvania campaign rally, striking his ear and killing an audience member, Corey Compator. who was busy polishing his applications to transfer from community college to a four-year engineering program.
Okay, are you as outraged as I am?
They're sitting here talking about all the plans he had in his life and then minimizing what he actually did.
Crooks was gathering transcripts and asking friends to review his personal statement.
Well, he was also designing a bomb.
Oh yeah, kind of an important fact there to throw into the mix.
Apparently Crooks had placed an order for more than two gallons of nitromethane from an online specialty fuel retailer using the encrypted email account.
12 days later, the purchase hadn't shipped and he wanted to know why.
So he emailed the seller, Hyper Fuels, to ask when it would arrive on January 31st, 2024.
He says, hello, my name is Thomas.
I place an order on your website on January 19th.
I still have not received any updates on the order shipping out yet, and I was wondering if you still have it and when I can expect it to come.
Crooks used his community college email account to inquire about the shipping of one of those operational missteps that was allowed for a rare look inside the dark side of this ambitious young student.
This is how they're painting this guy, right?
And they didn't even list Corey Compator's name.
I did.
I inserted his name because we should all be remembered that that gentleman had a family.
He had a wife.
He had a child.
And here he is.
He's sitting there just celebrating being at a rally with President Trump.
And what happens at a political campaign?
He loses his life because of the lamestream media and the fact that they have been calling for violence of this type.
And this guy goes off the rails.
Then you've got the lamestream media who sits there and covers up for these people constantly and act really as accomplices because they're cheering them on the whole way.
I mean, this whole thing, they talk about other stuff about Crooks, all right?
They talk about his SAT scores, the fact that he got a 1530 on his SAT, but had trouble with grammar and spelling.
His favorite season was fall, according to an essay on the email account.
He was a good student trying to save money by going to community college before transferring.
He thought Trump's nuclear weapons policies were misguided.
And so can we get back to the fact that the guy ordered bomb stuff?
I mean, hello.
Because autumn is great and even 1530 SAT scores can make a, you know, they can make grammatical errors at some point here or there.
But I think that the whole two gallons of nitromethane and whether or not it actually shipped to Crooks is probably on the top of the list, right?
So they did a little bit at Western Journal, they did some research on the Grok AI into what would be accomplished with that if he were to make a backpack size bomb, say it would have like a lethal radius of up to 30 feet, it'd take a building down.
I mean, it would take a whole building down.
If he were to build a larger device with nitromethane as a starter and ammonium nitrate, a common ingredient and fertilizer, and a vehicle-borne bomb like that that brought down Alfred P. Murray Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995, I mean, the Oklahoma City bombings?
Right.
Well, only about 400 pounds of ammonium nitrate would need to be added to the nitromethane to make a bomb with a blast radius capable of destroying a small building.
And now here we have all of this knowledge that Crooks was able to obtain about explosives and how he was able to put such a device together.
So it wasn't a dumb young guy, right?
I mean, what's the story behind the guy?
And that's what people are asking.
They are saying, hey, look, how is it possible that he was able to get even this far?
The lawyer behind all of this, and he is, of course, this Wally Zimmelong, would like to know, he's the litigator who pursued Crooks' record on behalf of America First Legal Nonprofit, which was founded, just so everybody knows, by White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, y'all's favorite, because when I asked you that, he just, I mean, he reigned supreme when I asked him the question a couple of weeks ago.
And they say there are a lot of important questions.
I mean, were they investigating anyone else?
Are they still investigating?
Zimalong asked.
I mean, a year later, we still don't know anything.
How is that even possible?
No, but we know the real important things.
The fact that fall was Crooks' favorite season, that he waxed poetic about fall weather and asked, who doesn't love the changing color of the leaves?
This is what CBS is reporting on.
So the closest that anyone has ever come to assassinating a president or a presidential candidate since the attempt on Ronald Reagan's life in 1981, 43 years have passed between those two attempts, a verifiable lifetime, given America's turbulent history.
And for the most of this article, they're talking about his favorite season was autumn.
I mean, you've got a shooter, a bungled Secret Service protection, and many other plots that may have hatched, and it's all been memory hold.
No one's even talking about it anymore.
And it's frightening because this is one of many.
Even CBS News reporting on the strange dichotomy between Thomas Crooks, an A student who loves sweater weather, and Thomas Crooks, attempted assassin, it may seem intentionally shrug.
I mean, well, what do you expect us to find is basically the subtext.
So we have no idea.
I mean, that's the thing.
There are people that do know exactly what happened with this guy and how many others like him are out there because it doesn't just stop as one, as you all know.
But how did he get the nitromethane?
I mean, why isn't anybody trying to figure this stuff out?
And how was he researching it?
Where was he getting his information?
You would think that one would want to find out.
Dan Rather was one of the people who once pressed the White House on a daily basis during the Watergate scandal to get to the whole truth.
Can CBS not do the same now with the authorities and Thomas Crooks when it's crystal clear we aren't being told the whole story?
It's true.
We're not being told a thing.
They are just putting it away and trying to focus on something else.
So we're going to head on over and start spilling the tea for this week's show.
We've got so much that has been uncovered with the Trump administration.
My gosh, he is just running circles around everyone.
And, you know, in a lot of ways, he's giving our government the breathing room because we're always watching what President Trump is doing next and not so much what they aren't doing like we should because we're sitting there constantly like, wow, okay, what else is he doing?
We're watching Trump and they're able to get a pass because no one is watching them.
We need to keep the pressure on all of these people, on the DOJ, on the FBI.
I mean, I'm not just going to have, you know, I'm not going to be sold quickly.
There's way too much information that's already been reported on a lot of this stuff, and we need to get to the bottom of it.
We won't get anywhere until we start closing these investigations instead of just opening a new one.
There's plenty of information out there that the American people should know, and there should be arrests already.
All right, let's start spilling.
And that is the work that President Trump will always be known for,
because he is doing it so beautifully when he exposes the crimes of the left.
And I'll tell you one thing, the Biden regime was the perfect one to come into President Trump's second term with because my goodness, you want to talk about what has been unearthed.
Well, possible crimes committed by the Biden staffers using the auto pen without presidential awareness has been outlined.
It's huge.
There are so many things that they can be charged with.
And so we're all kind of just tapping our finger going, hey, we know that there's a private club up there.
We recognize it.
We see it.
But what are you going to do about it?
So as questions swirl about Joe Biden's cognitive state and absentee leadership, new scrutiny is falling on the use of the presidential auto pen by Biden staffers, an automated signature device that has been used to sign executive orders and potentially even pardons.
So these staffers, if the reports are accurate, they could have engaged in multiple ongoing felonies.
House Oversight Chair Jim Comer, Republican Kentucky, he said that legislative subpoenas are being sent out, but what crimes could they be pursuing?
And something about, you know, online, will anybody be charged with any crimes?
That's the question we all want to know because the world watched in horror as, of course, Biden was slurring his words, falling from podiums, getting lost walking into the White House, having nurse Jill with him to make sure that he got from A to B as his nursemaid.
I mean, this was obvious to the world.
You even have fake Yapper who puts out a book trying to defend himself and all of this nonsense because he wants you to believe him now.
I mean, this thing is huge.
And that is why the lamestream media is just bracing themselves because they all have egg on their face.
They were all in on it.
Every single last one of them were in on it.
So nearly all of Biden's official signatures were done with the auto pen.
The Biden White House even issued criminal pardons with the auto pen.
There are two auto pens that were in use.
The Oversight PR Project identified times that Biden's pardons were issued while Joe Biden was known to be out of the White House on vacation and unable to run the automatic signature machine.
Project Veritas released a video showing David Hogg admitting that it was Jill Biden's chief of staff who was exerting a tremendous amount of unseen power in the Biden White House.
Trump has said whoever was using the auto pin was usurping the power of the presidency.
So who was running the American government under Sleepy Joe Biden?
Well, if the reports are accurate that the White House staff may have used Biden's auto pen to execute official acts without his direct knowledge or consent, the legal implications are not just alarming, they are criminal acts completely.
He issued, he, meaning Biden, a wide range of pardons in his last week, including a controversial one for his controversial son, Hunter.
Despite promising previously that he would not pardon Hunter, reports now coming out that Hunter exercised a great deal of power in the Biden White House.
It has some people wondering whether Hunter simply issued his own pardon without Joe Biden.
Pardons and Legal Consequences00:03:18
Most people are starting to come to that conclusion.
Same thing with the entire Biden family.
Here's what relevant federal law says.
If anyone in the executive office signed legal documents such as pardons or executive orders, diplomatic communications without the president's full and current awareness, they would likely violate multiple federal statutes.
And honestly, when you see Joe Biden getting out there, just saying that he's still going to beat people up in some of his latest interviews, it is appalling.
It is cringeworthy to watch this guy because he has absolutely no idea what is going on.
It's even worse than that.
I honestly don't even think that he knows that he's sick.
I think he thinks that he's talking about Bo with cancer.
I don't think it has actually entered his brain that he's the one we're all talking about.
That's how bad it is over there.
I mean, this stuff, you just can't make it up.
But for those that took and used this pen, right, this is what federal law says.
18 USC, Section 471, forgery of United States documents.
It is a crime to falsely make or use any writing for the purpose of defrauding the United States.
Signing the president's name via audit pen on legal instruments without his direct authorization is a textbook example.
The maximum penalty is 20 years in prison.
18 USC, Section 912, impersonation of a federal officer.
Pretending to be the president, even indirectly, by authorizing acts in his name while exercising that power, unlawfully carries up to three years in prison.
18 USC, Section 1001, False Statements.
Any deception involving a material act of government, especially in formal documents, it exposes the staffers to five to eight years in prison per count.
18 USC, Section 371, Conspiracy to Defraud the United States.
If multiple officials coordinated such actions, even internally, it may be prosecutable as conspiracy.
18 USC, Section 1503, 1512, obstruction of justice.
If any falsified pardons were used to derail or stop criminal proceedings, such as the Hunter Biden pardon, that stopped his charges and likely sentencing obstruction charges would apply.
18 USC, Section 1341, 1343, wire or mail fraud.
The use of email, phone, or interagency transmissions to process these fraudulent signatures might trigger additional felony charges.
A key legal question is going to be who knew what and when.
Incapacitated President, Secret Power00:12:20
Since Biden's cognitive decline was so obvious to anyone paying attention and Justice Department Attorney Robert Herr even noted it in his write-up of Biden's mishandling of classified documents, it's hard to claim that many were not aware that this was going on.
The 25th Amendment to the Constitution passed in 1967.
It was created to deal with this kind of situation.
A incapacitated president, particularly Section 4, contains the constitutional process designed to address a situation where a sitting president is unable or unfit to discharge the duties of office.
But it is either unwilling or unable to voluntarily step aside, which was the case of Biden.
It allows the vice president, which would not have been a step up by any means, but that is the natural progression, right?
And that she would come in, the majority of the cabinet would declare the president incapacitated and install VD, sorry, still got that for her, as the acting president.
If Biden's decline was stage managed in order to prevent the cabinet secretaries from being able to observe his mental incapacity, then the staffers involved could be liable for participating in a criminal conspiracy.
This is huge.
This is why President Trump is talking about it, because they pulled the wool over the American people from the very beginning, from the installation of Joe Biden to running things the way they wanted to run them after President Trump's first term and preventing him from having two in a row.
They did everything in their power.
They never thought we were going to have him in office again.
They never thought he would win.
They thought that they could use the powers that they had to destroy him and in the process destroy us and this country.
All of the things that make us great and different from North Korea, not North Carolina, North Korea, that make us different, they were trying to absolutely destroy.
They were going to do whatever it is with all of the power that they had to make sure that President Trump never got back into office.
Well, we certainly proved that.
Not wrong.
We absolutely did, and we will again.
But President Trump is going to need help.
He absolutely is.
But this is the biggest story of all.
It's one that we lived through in our lifetime.
It is one for the history books that people will be talking about forever.
And it is scary that it even happened.
As far back as 2017, Biden invented an incoherent story about growing up with a villain by the name of Cornpop at a local swimming pool.
The Washington Com Post went and investigated this senile lie, this obviously false story by Biden, and rated it true.
It appears they were part of the effort, of course, to keep Biden and his mental decline a complete secret.
Those White House staffers who participated in the cover-up would be potentially liable for being conspirators.
So 18 U.S.C., Section 371, conspiracy to defraud the United States.
If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States or to defraud the United States, and one or more of such persons do any act to affect the object of the conspiracy, this is what they're a part of.
This particular statute doesn't just require someone to do the illegal act, it criminalizes the agreement and the coordination to make it happen.
Even if one person presses the button, those who helped plan, cover up, or enable it are liable.
It could involve personal liability for several key Biden staffers who were in position of power and trust within the White House, including White House counsels Dana Ramus from 20 to 2021 to 2022, Stuart Daleary from 2022 to 2023, Ed Sisical 2023 to 2025, who likely provided approval,
even if informal to the presidential staff as they wielded Biden's tremendous power.
White House chiefs of staff, Ron Clain from 2021 to 2023, and Jeff Zentz from 2023 to 2025, who likely directed and at least knew of the use of the auto pen to approve key documents.
The White House Communications Director, Kate Beddingfield, from 2021 to 2023, Ben Labolt from 2023 to 2025, who helped orchestrate the cover-up from the public cabinet secretaries and Congress.
So from the release by Project Veritas, it also appears that the former First Lady Jill Biden's chief of staff, Anthony Burnell, he also apparently wielded significant power and authority in the Biden White House.
The White House isn't talking.
They have so far refused to disclose the internal policies governing the auto pen use or whether Biden personally reviewed documents before they were signed with his name.
The question that now must be answered is not whether Biden used the auto pen, but who else did and under what authority.
So one possible defense, just so everybody knows, is that these staffers were authorized by Biden in a supposedly lucent moment.
So expect that to come as their defense.
But an incompetent president like Biden is likely to have been incapable of properly authorizing staffers to take these actions.
So this is the thing.
In the past, in order to avoid all of this, presidents often recuse themselves, even if it's just a short stay in a hospital, right?
I mean, you had George Bush who did it twice formally.
He invoked the 25th Amendment while getting routine colonoscopies in 2002 and 2007.
And he transferred it to Vice President Dick Cheney.
And in 1985, you had Ronald Reagan.
He went through surgery for colon cancer and he transferred the presidential power to Vice President George H.W. Bush for about eight hours.
So there are all these different methods that have been done before.
They used him.
The Office of Legal Counsel previously approved of an auto pin and use under very narrow circumstances, primarily for bills where the president has expressly directed use.
But the legal direction must be current, active, and informed, not inferred.
And it certainly isn't assumed by unelected aides behind closed doors.
No.
So the court's primary way of remedying past illegal actions by governmental bodies would be to invalidate the actions altogether.
However, in this case, with fever-pitch politics at stake, the courts are probably unlikely to take a principled and courageous stand to invalidate the illegal actions taken in Biden's name.
They're just going to try to shove it up under the rug.
I'm sure of that.
If military orders or diplomatic recognitions were ever signed in this way, it moves beyond fraud to possible constitutional crisis, which is what I believe we all went through.
You had the journalist Seymour Hirsch, who claimed that Biden engaged in an action of international terrorism.
You all remember that, right?
When he authorized the underwater bombing of the Russian natural gas pipeline, the Nord Stream 2, in 2022.
This was going on under Biden.
It is unreal.
Remember what happened in Afghanistan?
Look at our borders.
I mean, this was complete and total chaos for four years.
If the White House and military officials proceeded with this action on the sole authority of staff without clearing it by a confused and mentally incapacitated president, there could be enormous liabilities.
The Biden National Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan, and Under Secretary of State, Victoria Newland, for example, could lose governmental immunity for taking such actions without a competent president to hide behind for presidential immunity.
Okay, it's not even that these people just said, oh, let's just ignore the fact that he has no idea what's going on.
What we're going to do instead is we're just going to take that power and we're just going to use it ourselves.
They covered up so they could have all of the power, the greatest power in the world, and they all used it, every single last one of them.
They covered up for Biden.
They allowed it to be business as usual.
They ushered in the press and then the press would cover and they would usher them out.
And then you would hear that Biden was on vacation, but there was all this work being done behind the scenes.
Well, they were doing whatever it is they wanted to do.
The extraordinary power of the American presidency is not meant to be used by staff to issue pardons or sign executive orders and engage in international terrorism with a mentally incapacitated president at the helm.
I mean, this could probably represent one of the gravest constitutional crises in U.S. history.
Not merely a question of fitness, but legitimacy.
If a president was being used as a figurehead while real power is secretly exercised elsewhere by unelected staffers, every action of the government in the past four years and potentially, it's potentially illegitimate.
Everything, everything that we just went through.
The Obama and the Biden Justice Departments, they were very aggressive in their use of lawfare and political persecutions.
They went after conservative media outlets, Republican campaigns, and campaign staffers sought to jail all of January 6th protesters and aggressively targeted their perceived political enemies.
And do not forget, somebody was writing these speeches for Biden.
Somebody was chirping in his ear how bad MAGA was, how bad MAGA was.
So they would get him out there.
They would push him to a podium.
And we just sat there and we're like, what else is he going to do to us?
Oh my gosh.
Because we identify or we are affiliated with a party.
Look at what they did to President Trump.
I mean, these people weren't just secretly doing it.
They were showing us what kind of power they had.
And they made us suffer for it.
Ruined people's lives.
Their livelihoods will never, ever be the same.
So, of course, a lot of people are skeptical that Trump's Attorney General, I'm one, I will not hesitate to answer that, who has so far proven to loath to pursue the Democrat crimes that have been committed and criminal activities.
I hope she follows up on these crimes.
American Backlash00:08:35
I mean, though reportedly the Justice Department is probing the potential misuse of the auto pen.
But I mean, really, this should have been done.
They should have been ready on day one to go after this.
This wasn't a secret.
We were watching this in real time.
So I hope I'm wrong about Pam Bondi, but where do we draw the line?
We've already gone through, you know, sessions and bar and all of these different people that just could not handle it, or didn't want to, rather.
They just ignore it.
How far do we let her go until we say, okay, it is time for a new AG.
We need somebody to lead instead of somebody on a talk show.
How much time do we give her?
How much time do we have?
I don't know.
It's a question for all of us.
So now we have got the waste of the day.
This is an incredible story.
I mean, you want to talk about waste, fraud, and abuse.
Here it is.
$750 billion annual fraud.
This is a former government accountability office executive recently told 60 Minutes that she believes the federal government loses $550 billion to $750 billion to fraud each year.
It's an increase from previous estimates.
So last year, you had GAO, it was a study that claimed that the fraud cost the U.S. government $233 billion to $521 billion annually, though the authors noted we cannot eliminate the possibility that the actual amount of fraud could be outside the range of our estimate.
So Linda Miller, who spent 10 years at the GAO as an assistant director, said the estimate is too low.
Her $750 billion figure represents more than 11% of all the money the government spent last year.
So here it is, taxpayer money just wasted.
According to Miller, the money, most of the money is stolen by sophisticated criminals, often overseas, with smaller amounts taken by individuals lying about eligibility for unemployment, insurance, or social security.
You have foreign cyber criminals who are now focusing on extreme weather.
Miller said, when a storm occurs in America, fraudsters, they buy stolen identities from zip codes where the disaster happened, and then they apply for federal grants and assistance.
So they're just waiting.
There's storm chasers, all right?
They're sitting there waiting.
They're like, okay, who's there?
What's their address?
Let's claim we're them.
And then they're getting their benefits.
So Brian for Forndra, he is the head of FBI's cyber division.
He told 60 Minutes that nearly every American's personal information, it can be purchased online.
The FBI is constantly putting new protections in place, but Miller says that that just creates a game of whack-a-mole.
The fraudsters are seeing where better controls are being put in place, and then they go where the controls still haven't been improved.
So they know exactly what they're looking for.
I mean, it's just looking for that one little squirrel hole.
That's exactly what they've got.
Miller also served as deputy executive director on the pandemic response at the accountability committee.
And you want to talk about fraud?
I mean, past estimates that $1 trillion was lost to fraud during the pandemic, or as a lot of us call it pandemic.
It was like they threw money in the air and just let people run around and grab it.
Billions flowed to fraud rings in China and Russia who use stolen personal data to impersonate Americans.
This is unbelievable.
So if a private business consistently loses more than $1 of every 10 to fraud, it would soon close its doors.
Well, same thing with the federal government.
It's time to get it in check.
We've got to get it in check.
But the thing about it is, we've got Congress that's on vacation.
They're not worried about it.
Well, I'm certainly worried about it.
I don't know why we're paying taxes even.
Honestly, at this point, if it's just going up into a free-for-all, I'd rather give it to somebody that needs it.
So, American backlash: why the Letitia James mortgage fraud investigation resonates with Americans.
Again, the left is completely tone deaf when they recognize the fact that America has been paying attention to this case because you had an AG who got up there on camera and she campaigned on getting President Trump.
We're going to definitely sue him.
We're going to be a real pain in the he's going to know my name personally, Letitia James said during her 2018 campaign for New York Attorney General.
James campaigned openly on her intention to target President Trump.
I mean, she was so thrilled to do it.
She had this big smile on her face when she would make the announcement.
She would describe him as an illegitimate president and an embarrassment while pledging to pursue any and all legal avenues to scrutinize his finances, his real estate transactions after being elected.
She says, I look forward to seeing him in court when I assume my new position.
Okay, well, how the mighty have fallen.
Upon taking office in 2019, James promptly followed through filing a lawsuit that ultimately led to a $454 million civil judgment against President Trump and his organization for allegedly overvaluing assets on mortgage applications, despite industry standard disclaimers advising lenders to conduct their own valuations.
And not only that, no one was hurt.
There was no person that said, Hey, this hurt me, or bank or any institution that said this hurt me in one way or another.
There was no victim.
But despite all of her efforts to harm him politically, President Trump actually won the election.
And a lot of people say that the reason, one of the reasons why, is because of this lawfare that was put on him.
Between that and the assassination attempts, it could not be clear to anybody that was watching that they have been out to destroy this man.
And if they could do that to a former president, what could they do to you?
Well, we saw the January 6th.
We saw what they did to them.
They were not going to stop.
And then they try to assassinate the president, and he comes back.
What separated him from the rest is he put his fist in the air and he said, fight, fight, fight.
And you know what?
We were all like, at that moment, even people that I was around that were Democrats their entire life, they blinked their eyes and said, this man is incredible.
This man is absolutely incredible.
Sign me up.
It was an eye-opening experience.
And so the left does what the left do.
They continue to try to bash Trump and do all of these things, but it did not work.
He won in an absolute landslide.
We all said, We trust this man so much and how much he loves his country, we're going to give him everything.
We're going to give him a mandate.
We're going to give him a trifecta.
Now, where are you, Congress?
Why are we angry?
Because we did all of that and more besides.
We saw a man that stood up for us, stood up for our country, and we said, Okay, let's give it to him.
And then we've got these bozos who are on vacation.
No, it's not going to play.
It's not going to play well.
So Tish James, she even was so pompous that she puts out social media posts.
I mean, she rode this thing till you couldn't ride this poor little horse anymore.
She says, Here's what at real Donald Trump needs to know.
I've spent my career standing up to bullies.
I've got my eyes on Trump Tower.
Why Justice Failed00:03:50
Well, because America was founded as a democracy on the principles of equal justice under law and the weaponization of government agencies for political gain strikes at the very heart of public trust.
And that's exactly what happened.
Whether it's law enforcement, the courts, the IRS, or intelligence agencies, their legitimacy rests on absolute neutrality.
So the fact that she was not, and she came out of the gates as not being neutral at all, goes to show you everybody was watching this closely.
So of course, when you look at the American Revolution itself, it was born out of resistance, arbitrary rule.
Early Americans chafed under the British crown's abuses, searches without warrants, taxation, without representation, and politically motivated crackdowns.
I mean, that's why the founders designed a constitutional republic with checks and balances, precisely to prevent the rise of centralized power that could be wielded against dissenters.
That legacy still informs modern civic expectations to this day.
It absolutely does, and it is what makes our country great.
So, the reason why many Americans welcomed with open arms the recent referral of mortgage fraud allegations against Letitia James to the Department of Justice by the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency, FHFA, and why news of an FBI investigation into her conduct, why it struck a court.
Well, the first referral says that James fraudulently claimed a property in Norfolk, Virginia, as her principal residence on legal documents related to a power of attorney she executed to purchase a home.
At the time, she was legally living in Brooklyn, New York.
The referral asserts that this false representation enabled her to qualify for mortgage under false pretenses and received a more favorable loan term.
The information first came to light, and it was incredible when you started looking at the receipts that the New York Attorney General Letitia James then declares Virginia home her principal residence.
She knew the law, she knew the rules.
The second allegation centers on a government-backed HAMP loan.
This is a home affordable modification program application James made in 2011.
As you all know, this was huge.
I mean, the big development is that she is guilty of mortgage fraud.
Of course, she is.
From March 18, 2025, she misrepresented the number of legal units in her Brooklyn apartment building, stating that it had fewer than it actually did to qualify for a reduced interest rate loan under the HAMP program.
James was not eligible for.
She knew the rules.
She knew exactly what she needed to do to qualify for them.
I mean, she arranged this so that she could get away with it.
I mean, she wanted everything and she thought that she could.
The application was ultimately approved.
James obtained a favorable 2.7 interest rate with the government loan on the backs of the American taxpayers.
The referral also cites that Letitia James a legal scheme where she claimed she had married her own father in a 1983 loan application to obtain lower interest rates.
I mean, this woman was about as calculated and as crooked as you can get.
So at its core, the public perception of Letitia James' weaponization of government, it's not about party at all.
Judge Rafe Strikes Down Tariffs00:15:03
It's about principle.
I mean, most Americans, regardless of their political allegiance, understand that when the power is misused today against one side, it can just as easily be turned on us.
So we live in a country where justice is blind.
It's not vengeful.
And yet, here we go.
We have got a prosecutor, somebody that is used to prosecuting these cases that have gone after these individuals.
And yet she was doing it all herself.
We cannot survive like this.
There is no way.
But that's why you've got Americans that are saying, hey, you know what?
Enough of this weaponization.
You also have the federal appeals court that reinstates Trump's tariffs.
So a federal appeals court on Thursday, they temporarily reinstated President Trump's tariffs after the Court of International Trade in New York said that President Trump exceeded his authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977.
AIPA.
The Trump administration immediately appealed the federal court's permanent injunction on Wednesday evening.
The in-bank order, the court's entire slate of judges granted Trump administration the immediate administrative stay less than 24 hours later.
One judge did not participate.
And President Trump knows all about these judges.
And everybody else is starting to get a crash course on this judicial coup and how they are using their powers to try and usurp President Trump's.
It's not going to work, but they are slowing us down.
They are using a lot of resources.
They are taking up a ton of time.
How does that affect us?
Well, we're not able to get as much done.
But I will tell you something.
President Trump is showing that that's not really the case because he's doing whatever he wants to do anyway.
While they're sitting there studying this, he's already working on that.
So he's using it to his advantage because they're all focused on one thing.
And President Trump is going ahead with his plan.
He knows he has four years to get this done.
So the one judge did not participate in this particular event.
He says the request for an immediate administration stay is granted to the extent the judgments and the permanent injunctions entered by the Court of International Trade in these cases are temporarily stayed until further notice.
While this court considers the motion's papers, the federal circuit court said, according to all of these things that have been filed, and CNN says that the federal court's Wednesday injunction halted Trump's 30% tariffs on China, his 25% tariffs on some goods imported from Mexico and Canada, and 10% universal tariffs on most goods coming into the United States.
It does not, however, affect the 25% tariffs on autos, auto parts, steel, or aluminum, which were subject to section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, a different law than the one Trump cited for his broader trade action.
So then you had, of course, last week, U.S. District Court Judge T. Kent Wetherall, who suggested that President Trump had the authority to impose tariffs under IEPA, a ruling from the 1970s, but did not issue an order.
According to the judge, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 gives Trump the authority to set tariffs for reasons other than raising revenue.
Wetherell wrote, That's like a funny, funny last name.
Then you put another W behind it, and then you're like, blah.
Anywho, you get it.
That Trump's justification for the tariffs, both stemming from the flow of illicit drugs into the country and revolving a trade imbalance, is sufficient to satisfy the terms set by Congress.
However, rather than issuing an order, this Judge Wetherell punted the case from a federal court in southern Florida to the Court of International Trade.
So the judge transferred one of the lawsuits to the federal court in New York.
So on Wednesday, you had a three-judge panel at the U.S. Court of International Trade.
They ruled President Trump exceeded his authority and unilaterally imposed tariffs under AIPA.
The three-judge panel, including Gary Katzmann, Obama judge, Timothy Rafe, a Trump judge, and Jane Rostani, a Reagan judge.
In a separate federal court on Thursday, an Obama-appointed judge ruled Trump's tariffs are unlawful.
We shall see.
Because then you've got the Supreme Court who is having to weigh in, I think, a little bit more than they like to these days.
I think they're tired of hearing the backlash and how we actually feel about them.
They're supposed to be unbiased.
They are supposed to, you know, basically issue their orders on the Constitution.
However, you're seeing a lot of things get slid through the cracks and a lot of things with Judge Roberts and everybody, Amy Comey Barrett, Commy Barrett, I should say.
It's going to be an interesting ride because he is fighting and he's fighting uphill.
The Supreme Court issues a 7-2 ruling allowing President Trump to revoke the legal status of hundreds of thousands of migrants from four countries.
Now, this was a start.
There's so many more, though, okay?
But it is a start.
They are starting to recognize, I believe, that this country made sure, and we've made it known, that we do not like open borders.
We do not like people here in our country illegally, and we certainly do not want to be paying for them.
So the Supreme Court granted President Trump a legal victory in his war against unfettered immigration and activist judges.
This was on Friday.
They ruled that the Trump administration could end temporary worker protections and work authorizations for more than 500,000 migrants from these four countries.
Now they're Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.
The decision reversed a ruling by an Obama judge just two days ago.
The 7-2 ruling will remain in place pending a court challenge, which, of course, we will expect.
The two worst judges were Sonia Sadomayar and, of course, Katanji Brown Jackson.
They dissented and they whined that the court botched the analysis when an emergency relief is warranted.
She also added it, it draws attention to the real harm to real people, please.
So, of course, President Trump has won this one.
They are hearing and they are getting the message that something needs to be done.
It's a start.
I mean, like I said, we've got millions in here illegally thanks to the O-Biden regime, and it was on purpose.
But we're going to learn more about this case.
Believe me, it's far from it being picked apart.
They always are, but it's interesting.
Supreme Court is starting to understand that these judges are out of control.
So they are reining them in a little bit in the latest ruling.
In an 8-0 ruling, they reined in these judges just a little bit as the rogue judges wage war on the Trump administration.
I mean, seriously, this is what they think they are there to do.
These leftist liberal judges, activist judges, think that it is now their calling to go and stop everything this administration is doing.
That's what they think their calling is.
It's not.
At issue was the National Environmental Policy Act, NEPA, a decades-old law that opened the door for the left to paralyze economic development by blocking projects over environmental concerns.
This was one of the ways they were trying to put their foot in the door.
Far left environmental groups have used NEPA to stop the expansion of oil refineries and other important energy projects.
The Supreme Court said that NEPA cannot be weaponized to micromanage, delay, or block new projects based on environmental effects.
This was a huge win for us because, as you know, the left does everything they can to slow us down.
So, Gorsuch was not there for Thursday's ruling, but all the others were.
Big stuff.
I'm glad to see it, but it's slow, and that's what they count on.
They can hang this stuff up in courts forever.
But we've got receipts on some of these judges that we've been talking about and that we've been focusing so hard on.
Laura Loomer does amazing reporting.
I don't think there's a person out there, whether you're on the left or the right, that doesn't recognize her abilities in exposing what needs to be exposed.
And here she is doing it again.
The spouse of a judge who issued a ruling against Trump's tariffs has international corporate ties that benefit from ruling, raising concerns over the judicial corruption and conflicts of interest.
So she has copied all of those important people that need to be copied on this particular memo.
So I believe they're all reviewing it.
And she goes on to explain this.
And so I'm going to read it from her account at Laura Loomer.
If you're not following Laura, you're in for a ride.
You'll enjoy yourself immensely.
In a controversial ruling yesterday, Judge Timothy Rafe of the U.S. Court of International Trade, USCIT, was one of the three judges on a panel who struck down tariffs imposed by the Trump administration, igniting a firestorm of criticism over judicial overreach.
However, the most damning aspect of the ruling went completely unnoticed by the media.
Loomard Strategies has exclusively uncovered evidence of judicial corruption and conflicts of interest that benefit the spouse of Judge Rife.
The decision which slashes costs for imported goods directly benefits the financial empire tied to Rife's wife, Desiree Green, who is a high-ranking executive at Prudential Financial Inc., raising serious questions about the impartiality of the judiciary.
So, Green, who serves as Vice President of International Affairs at Prudential and a director at AFP Habitat, a Chile-based pension fund in which Prudential holds a 40% stake, wields significant influence over global trade policies.
Her advocacy for open market aligns seamlessly with Rife's ruling, which serves her corporate interest while padding the couple's financial portfolio.
Prudential is a powerhouse in insurance and investment, relies on stable trade conditions to bolster its international operations, including its substantial stake in AFP Habitat, which manages pensions for nearly 2 million clients across Chile, Peru, and Colombia.
Rife's decision to dismantle the Trump-era tariffs, which had driven up costs for goods entering the U.S. as a way to hold other nations financially responsible for illegal immigration and exploitation of foreign aid, delivers a clear win for Prudential's bottom line.
High tariffs strained the company's global supply chains, particularly in technology and financial services divisions, while also threatening the profitability of AFP, Habitat's investment in Latin America.
By axing these levies, Rife has stabilized trade flows, paving the way for economic growth in the region, growth that fuels pension contributions and swells AFP Habitat's returns, directly benefiting Prudential's 40% ownership.
You want to talk about conflict of interest?
This is it.
Green's role at Prudential delegitimizes the ruling her husband participated in, which reeks of judicial corruption.
As a lobbyist focused on shaping U.S. and international trade policies, Green navigates complex regulations to favor Prudential's global reach, including its Latin American pension markets.
Her position at AFP Habitat further entwines her professional duties with her husband's judicial purview, creating a nexus where personal profit and independent judiciary collide.
This is a huge deal.
This is how it is being done.
These judges know that when they take these cases, and all of a sudden, you see, as a result, all of these things happen almost in real time.
So it's textbook conflict of interest with Reife's ruling blatantly echoing Green's open trade stance, a stance that shields prudential from the financial headwinds of the Trump tariffs.
It's worth noting that as a result, in real time, it rose 2% following the tariff rollback by the judicial panel.
And for Judge Reif and his wife, Desiree Green, the ruling translate into tangible benefits as their livelihood is tied to prudential success, which hinges on tariffs.
She's brought the receipts so everybody can see them.
Here they are.
You've got all of this, who she is, the company profile, AFP habitat.
You've got May 21st, 2025, what's the impact of less migration on remittances.
FBI's Whistleblower Plot00:15:55
This is huge.
I mean, this is so glaring.
You have Desiree Green, the dialogue, who is Vice President, International Government Affairs, Prudential Financial.
Here she is on the list.
And then, of course, weddings, Desiree Green to Timothy Rafe.
There they are.
Can't get any better than that, can you?
Telling you what.
Crooked to the core.
Which brings us to the Whitmer kidnapping hoax.
My goodness.
I'm so glad that President Trump is actually speaking out on this stuff on the regular.
He really is.
I mean, when he says railroaded, I mean, that is the word that comes to mind.
This whole thing just absolutely played such a part in the elections.
And the way the media spun it and ran off with it was just like everything else they do.
But my gosh, I mean, Hollywood better get with a program because I don't think they can write things this good.
I really do not.
So Whitmer hoax pardons documents set to reveal more FBI lies.
Why they didn't just shut the whole FBI down, just disband it and start again and actually just expand all of these other agencies, I will never understand it.
The agency is just completely corroded and it's getting in its own way in the work of the American people.
It's getting in our way.
It really is.
So in October 2020, the FBI announced it had thwarted a plot to kidnap and kill Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, arresting more than a dozen individuals affiliated with various militia groups.
Well, what the FBI did not disclose is that they were the ones.
They were the ones who crafted the plot and encouraged a small group of Michigan men to attend FTXs or field training exercises, militia meetings, many of which were being put on by the FBI.
This is what I'm telling everybody.
I mean, really, why we still are even talking about January 6th and the insurrection that the leftists, I mean, seriously, the media has almost dropped all but dropped that story because they know it's coming at some point.
But get it over.
Let's go.
I mean, come on, getting old over here.
So at the same time, a news network of FBI informants, they manipulated the whole thing.
I mean, they've been talking about how they were secretly recorded.
They were part of it.
They hatched this plot.
The announcement of the charges coincided with the 2020 election, where rampant systematic voter fraud was found throughout Michigan, especially in the absentee ballot programs in key battleground states for President Trump's reelection.
You have the FBI.
They gave a major campaign advertisement and political win to far-left Democrats who were claiming that Trump and his followers were dangerous extremists.
I mean, this was all part of the plan here.
But of course, the scope and scale of the FBI corruption, it went way deeper than anybody even realizes.
And in all of these cases, you see that the FBI was somehow involved.
Maybe that's why they don't want us to see anything because of their involvement.
And I know we've got a whole bunch of company men now, right?
I mean, they're sticking up for these agencies like nothing I've ever seen.
They're trying to save them.
They understand that people have livelihoods.
You know what?
If they're that good, then they can go and work for other agencies.
But we're not getting things done in a manner that has any urgency.
It doesn't seem like.
And I'm tired of the hype.
I'm tired of the promises when they've been sitting on this stuff forever.
And I do believe this has a lot to do with it.
And then on top of this, I believe 100% that there is so much blackmail on all of these people that has been occurring for so many years now that no one, do they believe, is going to stand out of line or step out of line.
They're just not going to do it.
When you see how composed Comey is and how confident and how cocky he is, how narcissistic he is, no telling what kind of goods he has on a lot of these people.
I mean, you can't sit there and say anybody that is this ridiculous, that just smiles in that plastic way that he does, that he doesn't have a checkmate on them all.
He's going to bring down the house.
That is his Trump card, or so he thinks.
Of course, they don't have anything on President Trump.
He has been investigated more than anybody in our entire lifetime, and they couldn't come up with anything.
So we have President Trump and Trump Party pardon attorney Ed Martin, who are openly considering pardoning the men.
An action Urso believes is overdue, of course, and cannot come soon enough.
Trump has honestly and openly said, look, about the Whitmer kidnapping prisoners, it looks like they got railroaded.
I'd say for nearly five years, you had Christina, who was working with a background in law.
She conducted interviews and poured over thousands of pages of court transcripts and proceedings to uncover what the real story was in the Whitmer kidnapping hoax.
She's got a documentary that's coming out, Kidnap and Kill.
It is due to come out this fall with a current planned release of, I believe, November 2025.
I don't think she had a date on there yet.
But what she says is that the FBI's corruption is way worse than anybody knows.
So the defendants were accused of planning to storm, remember, planning to storm the Capitol, planning to storm, all right, yeah.
Planning to storm the Michigan Capitol, incite a civil war, and ultimately abduct Whitmer from her vacation home, allegedly in response to COVID-19 restrictions and perceived government tyranny.
The federal government charged six men with conspiracy to kidnap, and additional defendants were charged under state law with terrorism and weapons offenses.
There were four trials, two federal and two in the state of Michigan.
What Christina says and what the FBI has never admitted, regardless of who's up there, is that they wanted the plot to be a multi-state plot with various militia groups kidnapping governors or storming capitals all at the same time,
hoping to sweep up many more individuals who were likely either innocent or who were making idle boasts in response to federal agent provocateurs, but they were unable to get it off the ground.
So they were sitting there feeding these people, these lines, and getting them revved up and working all of these different angles.
The FBI was in charge.
That's what no one realizes.
They were the ones running the operation.
Well, you guys, you know.
You know how it's done.
I'm just saying anybody that you were to talk to that isn't watching this stuff since the very beginning going, okay, let's talk about the Whitmer kidnapping because it's such a joke to all of us.
We know exactly what the FBI is capable of and exactly what they have done.
And in all honesty, they're not very good at it, truly.
They're just not.
Patriot Front and all that nonsense.
I mean, please.
So the FBI was planning this whole thing.
It's straight out of the Soviet Union's criminal playbook.
I mean, they were trying to organize these militia groups, make some light connections between them all, and then come in with a major multi-state prosecution, like ensnaring potentially more men.
They weren't able to pull that off.
These men were the only ones, unfortunate, enough to be easy for them to put in prison on false charges.
So central to the prosecution's case was the use of undercover FBI agents and informants who infiltrated the group and recorded conversations and training sessions.
You had prosecutors who argued that the defendants were serious in their intentions, conducting surveillance of Whitmer's home and assembling weapons.
However, the defense attorneys argued that the FBI's extensive involvement amounted to entrapment, claiming the accused were coerced or manipulated into escalating their rhetoric and actions.
I mean, we remember all of this, right?
I mean, we remember the insurrection.
We got to go into the Capitol with that old fool.
Yeah, same thing.
Same group.
And of course, they always say, oh, but, you know, there were a lot of people that really weren't just, they were informants.
They were assets of the government.
They weren't actual government employees.
You know what?
When you are training and working with these people, they're more than just a title.
They are part of it.
I'm sorry.
And so is the FBI.
And they're going to absolutely have to take some responsibility in all of this.
So they can try to defer all they want, but at the end of the day, it means the exact same thing.
They definitely were a party to all of this.
So the entrapment claims were bolstered by evidence that the FBI informants had taken leadership roles in planning the activities and provided resources such as transportation and lodging.
Yeah, they went that far.
They also say that they point out URSA does in the impossibility of some of the government informants' proposed plans, including signing the governor's lake house, sieging the governor's lake house in northern Michigan.
I mean, with an amphibious landing in the fall, a likely impossibility given the weather in northern Michigan.
I mean, they just did not think some of this stuff through.
But there were several defendants in the state court that had mixed outcomes.
Some were convicted, others were acquitted, and some had some of the charges dropped.
The operation was part of a long-running federal program known as PATCON, which stands for Patriot Conspiracy.
The operation originally uncovered by Utah attorney Jesse Trentadu, who has investigated the death and likely murder by federal authorities of his brother Kenneth in 1995.
He uncovered it through decades of litigation related to the Freedom of Information Act, FOIA lawsuits.
PATCON operations have included variety of federal false flags and violence used to justify increasing federal police budgets as well as utilizing violence to achieve political ends.
This whole thing, I mean, it was a full-blown, illicit and ongoing PATCON operation, and it was used in the Whitmer kidnapping hoax.
This is the claim.
Erso claims this.
So it attracted, of course, national attention.
There's not a person out there that does not know about this case, I don't believe, unless, I mean, you're really not watching.
And it was played in the elections.
I mean, they used this.
They were talking about this.
Supporters of the government included federal prosecutors and Governor Whitmer herself argued the plot was real and dangerous regardless of FBI mistakes.
I mean, the whole thing, this is the problem.
But you've got the collapse of prosecution on entrapment and the illegality of the FBI to frame the defendants.
And that's what you have in all of these examples.
We have so many.
I mean, as soon as you saw the FBI enter Epstein Island, we all went, there goes the evidence.
We still don't know who's on the list.
I just thought I'd remind you of that.
Not that you needed any reminding.
We don't have any of the perverts being perp walked, just living their best life.
It is, though, when you start recognizing some of the biggest cases have the FBI's mitts all over them.
Who's going to stop them?
Who?
Is the fact that they worked for government, is that just a clear card where they're like, hey, you know what?
We can just go on.
We'll just sit this one out and then we get to go and go back to our positions in government whenever our guy is back in.
They owe me.
That's what it looks like to all of us that have been sitting here watching.
So how do they turn on the American people?
Well, I smell a lawsuit abrewing and I do hope I get to see it.
USDA whistleblower says Biden regime secretly crushed white farmers, only paying off farmer loans if they were not white males.
That's right.
That was happening right there in front of everybody.
You had a whistleblower from the Department of Agriculture who told News Nation that the Biden administration loan relief program purposely hurt white farmers.
The Biden regime, through the American Rescue Act, they passed $800 million in taxpayer money to secretly give loan forgiveness to minority farmers, and they left out the white farmers.
And it's discriminatory, it's unethical, and the people who pushed it are still in charge of the agency.
We've got to get rid of a lot of these people up there.
There's plenty of work to do.
The whistleblower also said that according to the American Rescue Plan, the relief was offered up to 120% loan to value, which means the farmers could claim they were upside down to get even more cash.
So essentially, yes, your loan would be forgiven up to 120% of the loan value.
This is according to the whistleblower.
Amazing, isn't it?
So hopefully something's going to happen with this one now that we've got people coming forward.
But a lot of people are still terrified of Washington D sleeves.
I mean, they really are.
You would think that we would, with the Trump administration, you would have all of these people coming forward and talking about what happened under Biden.
And though we're getting some information, there's still people that have been in government long enough who know that there are a lot of people that are going to re-enter government that are just sitting this one out because nothing's going to happen.
That's scary.
That's really scary.
You have a liberal outlet, Politico, who urges Democrats to create a shadow cabinet to counter Trump.
And the suggestions include John Fetterman's wife.
Yes, she's a little number, isn't she?
So progressive outlet, Politico, they are saying, hey, we need to create a shadow cabinet to fight Trump.
Politico's Hit Piece00:02:44
Well, perhaps they haven't heard, but the chair of the DNC announced that they are already doing that.
He said so back in April.
You remember when the Democrats and the media claimed to care about saving precious norms?
What do they call this?
The only difference between Politico's plan and the one the DNC chair already announced is who will be featured in the unconstitutional body.
So this whole shadow government ran the country for four years, but okay.
And Politico actually posted this.
Democrats need a shadow cabinet.
There are 21 unsuspected heavy hitters.
Who should fit it?
Who should fill it?
They're not even trying to hide this from you.
Look who's in the picture and try not to get a hernia, laughing out loud.
Seriously, be sure to sit down first.
And here are some of the players.
Really, really something.
Isn't it fascinating how the Democrats keep trying to offer the Democrats advice?
It's like, I mean, it's almost like they want to lose.
I remember when Politico put a hit piece on all of us in the Mighty 200.
I knew exactly and have known since then what they were capable of.
Here was my hit piece.
Sustained and ongoing disinformation assault targets dim presidential candidates.
That's right, me and the Mighty 200.
This was the article.
And you had Hillary Clinton, which her tweet, well, it was a tweet at the time, still a tweet that's still up because she has no fear, even though she's one of the biggest crooks we've ever seen in our entire lifetime, or we'll ever see again, hopefully.
Hopefully we won't have the status of Hillary Clinton again.
I don't know.
The way it's running, though, you almost think that this is okay in Washington.
But yes, this is the hit piece against me and 200 innocent Americans.
And Hillary Clinton, she put out a post and basically said, you know, that we were Russian bots, Russian agents, and linked our profiles directly to the article so that we were being threatened in our DMs and everything else.
Threatened and then celebrated.
I mean, it was like this complete half and half situation.
You had some people that were like, oh, you know, great job.
You got listed.
And then other people from the left who were like, I am going to kill you.
So it was kind of a mixed day.
I don't know.
But that's what happened.
They target their political opponents and they also target the supporters.
Preserving Election Integrity00:09:46
So here you've got an in-depth look at President Trump's election integrity order and why it's necessary.
He knows exactly what we need.
So he signed this executive order 14248.
It's entitled Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections.
Boy, do we ever need this.
He signed the order.
He mentioned that it may be the first of several election-related executive orders necessary to secure United States elections because honestly, he was one of a lifetime.
And I don't know if we're ever going to see, I know we were not.
In our lifetime, we're going to see another President Trump.
He's just that good.
But here is what's in it.
In the Article 2, Section 2, which states he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed.
The EO contains nine key sections, each of which references federal laws and the section that it helps to enforce.
So some brief highlights and legal justification for each section.
You've got purpose and policy.
Section one identifies how certain countries have election laws and procedures that protect their voters better than we do in the United States.
Some use voter ID, biometric database.
Others conduct elections on handmarked paper ballots that are counted in public to resolve disputes, while still others limit mail-in voting and do not accept ballots received after Election Day.
Hello, California.
By contrast, the United States election, they rely on self-attestation for citizenship.
They count votes in secret on, you know, software and they accept ballots that are received after the election is conducted.
Hello, California.
This section also identifies several unenforced federal laws, such as those requiring a uniform election day, prohibiting foreign nationals from voting and participating in elections, and requiring states to maintain an accurate and current statewide list of every legally registered voter in the state.
Hello, California.
Yep, my state is pretty much corrupt to the core when it comes to our elections.
And it's interesting because when you get to the point that California is, they can't blame anybody but themselves.
They have taken every single election.
The whole state is blue.
They're wondering why things aren't going well over here.
And all you can blame is a Democrat.
But yet they still find a little conservative in one area, one nook or cranny, and they say, that's who's doing it.
Please.
Nobody's fallen for that stuff anymore.
So enforcing the citizenship requirement for federal elections, that's exactly what they're going to do.
And it is to amend its national mail voter registration form issued, including document proof of U.S. citizenship, a U.S. passport, an identification document compliant with the requirements of 2005 Real ID Act, the official military identification card, or a valid federal or state government-issued photo ID, just to prove that you're a citizen.
And they're laying the groundwork.
In section two, it lays the groundwork for future directions by ordering DHS with the Department of Government Efficiency, Doge, to review each state's publicly available voter registration list and records records concerning maintenance activities required by National Voter Registration Act.
So that's huge.
There's Doge again.
They thought they were getting rid of Elon Musk.
He's only going to get stronger in this, but he's going to be behind the scenes doing it, and I don't blame him.
Providing other assistance to states verifying eligibility, you have Section 3 that orders Commissioner of Social Security to make available Social Security number verification service and death master file.
So all of those that were voting that had a tag on their toe, they're not going to be able to do that anymore.
And to help state and local election officials verify eligibility of individuals registering to vote or who are already registered.
So you have the DOD who is going to update their federal postcard application.
That's going to be good.
Then you've got improving the Election Assistance Commission, and it's Section 4, which orders the EAC to amend the voluntary voting system guidelines.
It's volume 2.0 so that it can mandate a voter verifiable paper record to prevent fraud or mistakes.
It specifically excludes certifications of voting systems that use a ballot in which a vote is contained within a barcode or QR code in vote counting, except where necessary to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
It takes a critical step of ordering the EAC to review and recertify voting systems under the new standards established in this section and to rescind previous certifications of voting equipment based on prior standards.
Then you have section 5, which is good.
It's prosecuting election crimes.
Section 5 orders the Attorney General, the AG, to enter information into sharing agreements as possible with the state election official or multi-member agency of each state to provide the DOJ with suspected violations of state and federal election laws.
It also orders the AG to prioritize enforcement of federal election integrity laws and to conduct reviews for potential withholding of DOJ grants.
Then you have Section 6, which improves the security of the voting systems.
So the AG, DHS, will take action to prevent all non-citizens from being involved in federal election administrations.
That includes access to election equipment, ballots, or relevant materials, as long as DHS maintains designation of elections as critical infrastructure.
So this EU is absolutely going to take these necessary steps to review and report security of all of these electronic systems used in the voter registration.
That's a good thing.
Compliance with federal laws setting the National Election Day.
That's going to be a big one.
Section 7 is ordering the AG to enforce federal laws prohibiting states from including absentee or mail-in ballots received after Election Day and final tabulation of votes for presidential electors and U.S. Senate and House candidates.
Overseas military personnel and citizen ballots are accepted at this time.
So these if it also orders the EAC to condition funding to states on compliance that each state adopt uniform and non-discriminatory standards that define what constitutes a vote and what will be counted as a vote.
Section eight, it is preventing foreign interference and unlawful use of federal funds.
It orders the AG and the Treasury Secretary to prioritize enforcement of laws that prevent foreign nationals from contributing or donating in U.S. elections and prohibit lobbying by organizations or entities that have received federal funds.
So you've got that, the federal actions to address the executive order 14019.
It orders heads of federal agencies and EAC to cease all agency actions implementing the previously revoked EO 14-019 promoting access to voting and submit a report describing compliance with the order and to the president through his domestic policy assistant.
And that's EO 14-019 implemented.
Get out the vote initiatives in the agencies without clear supporting.
federal law.
So the challenges are that several media assets have falsely reported that the Trump EO was blocked by a judge.
However, the EO has roughly 40 individual provisions and only two have been subjected to a temporary injunction, regardless of what you're hearing.
The most significant injunction claim is that the president cannot order the EAC to amend its voter registration form to include proof of citizenship because it is an independent entity.
This claim will likely be supplemented by Trump's previously mentioned Article II presidential powers, but even if it isn't, it's moot because if Congress will pass the SAVE Act or the EAC, which is already being consulted with the states as required, it simply calls an executive session and votes to amend the form.
So that's the way around it.
But regardless, I mean, you've got common sense, obvious protections for American voters.
Term Approval: 38%00:06:42
I mean, you've got to have it.
Lawsuits naming Trump and the EAC members.
It's pending certain parts of Trump's orders.
They were filed by 19 attorneys general, all Democrat, and one Democrat National Committee, Democrat Governor Association.
You had the Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee, Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee.
Boy, these Democrats are a little nervous about this, aren't they?
Plus, minority leaders Schumer and Representative Jeffries.
Why would they be so opposed to honest elections?
Hmm.
So, in conclusion, the Democrat judges and even the EAC need to come to the realization that we are in the midst of an election security crisis.
If you look at my state, you can see it on display.
And we want real solutions to these problems.
Tired of people saying, Hey, it doesn't matter if I vote or not.
I hear that all the time in California.
I mean, when you look at the fact that you've got voter rolls that show 20% of ineligible registration rates, where you can go in and get a driver's license at the local DMV and then automatically be added to the voter roll.
I mean, this is the argument that so many people that I say, aren't you going to vote today?
And they're like, Why bother?
That's what they say.
And I'm like, Because it's important.
They're like, Not here, it's not.
It's an open secret, and that's sad.
So, hopefully, this is going to help and it will get people.
I mean, then you have to explain to people: oh, no, we've corrected that.
We had an executive order with Donald Trump.
He's fixed it.
Now, let's get out and vote.
That's got to catch up and it's got to get momentum.
So, the more we can see President Trump making those announcements and everyone rallying behind it, the more people will know about it, which is good.
You know what else is good?
This.
For the first time in Ras Musson's polling history, a majority of Americans says that the U.S. is on the right track.
I'm one of them.
I'm so happy President Trump is back.
And now, all of a sudden, we're starting to see these polls and these reports that Ras Musson, which is a fabulous account, honestly, if you're not following them, make sure that you do.
That the majority of Americans say that the U.S. is on the right track, regardless of what the lame stream tries to drudge up, right?
I mean, you've got all kinds of people that are trying to say quite the opposite, and they may be loud, but they're not right.
So, it happened for the first time in polling history.
A majority says the country is doing exactly what it needs to say to do.
And Mark Mitchell of Ras Mussen reports, and that's at Honest Polster.
That's the account.
Says, don't F it up, Republicans.
Boy, there has been a lot of language today on this show.
Oh my gosh.
I think everybody's feeling the same.
I really, really do.
But it's one of those things.
When you look at what President Trump has been able to accomplish, my word, it's quite a lot.
I am so proud of him.
He is definitely the man that we needed for this time.
I mean, look at this.
Americans' view of Joe Biden's presidency.
Failure, 61%.
Success, I don't know who the 38% is.
I don't know, the upper echelon, the pharmaceutical companies, the big corporations, big tech, all of those people that were able to really cash in Amazon and others during Joe Biden's residency and the auto pen.
I think that's the 38%.
But yes, President Trump is doing amazing.
He is enjoying a 52% favorability rating.
This is big, big.
So, regardless of what they're spewing over there, that's what's actually going on.
Reality check: President Trump's approval.
There he is doing what he does best.
It's great to see.
Loving watching the polling data.
Love watching people that were moderates or independents or really weren't even involved in politics now involved.
You're starting to see the numbers here, more than 50%.
Trump's approval rating has not fallen below 45.2% during his second presidential term.
And his approval rating stands at 47.5, climbing almost daily over the past three weeks.
I mean, by contrast, at this juncture in President Trump's first term, his approval rating stood at only 39.9%.
And now, when you had per RCP, President Trump's first term approval rating hit a low of 37% on December 13th, 2017, and hit a high of 47.3% on March 27th, 2020.
Joe Biden, boy, he only got a 39% on January 20th, 2025, and then approaching his all-time low approval rating of 37.1 on July 18th.
So President Trump, his approval rating, he's just knocking it out of the park.
It's about 5% higher on average in his second term compared to his first.
Real growth, real momentum.
And I would have to agree with Mark, don't F it up.
I would have to agree with that statement.
Please do not.
We cannot afford it.
Not at this juncture.
We have got one shot or we're going to really pay for it.
And the Democrats aren't even making it a secret.
They really are not.
They are coming out and they are saying exactly what they are going to do if they are ever in the position of power again.
Heck, you have Comey, who's over there doing the exact same thing.
He's sitting there smugly saying, oh, it's only a matter of time, Republicans, once we get our foot back in the door and we're going to make you all suffer.
Do not forget that.
So they're using fear, like they always do, to try to, you know, get Republicans to just stay on vacation and not do a thing.
And they just think that President Trump and MAGA is going to go away.
Fear Tactics Revealed00:15:04
They don't realize that we're stronger than ever.
All right.
So that concludes our segment of that part of our show.
That's the spilling the tea.
Honestly, we have been buzzing a while, but Trump exposing crime truly is the big story because with every single move he makes, we are able to unravel something that was going wrong in government.
So we're going to hit the dish.
This is our Daily Dish segment where we dish about what people are talking about on the street.
And here it is.
You've got the DNC vice chair David Hogg, who admits in undercover footage that Jill Biden's chief of staff was operating the Biden-White House.
Surprise, surprise.
As Cat Turd calls him, noodle arms.
That's right.
This is their spokesperson, and they're even trying to DEI him out of the Democrat Party.
I think he's not going to have any choice.
I expect any minute for him to knock on the Republicans door because he is screwing up major.
If any, if there were ever an example, last week was it.
He just could not stop talking.
And he got into a lot of trouble that way.
So here he is undercover.
Again, we will remind you that if, and Kat always puts this out in such a funny, clever way, if there's a 10 in the room and you're a two and they all of a sudden come up to you and want to talk about you and the work that you do and you happen to work in one of these really high powerful positions, it's not you they're after.
It's your information.
So here we've got it.
Nice to meet you.
Off there, good of course.
Foundational question for me is like, how corrupt is the DNC if so many people knew or few people knew about Biden?
Well, the president of the United States.
I mean, I did the fact of the matter is the DNC is always going to be like a campaign arm of the president, ultimately.
The bigger issue was like the inner circle that was without Biden.
That's it.
And I can't stress, I can't stress you enough.
Like, Joe Biden's chief of staff had an enormous amount of power.
Joe Biden?
Joe Biden's chief of staff.
That was like an open secret at the left.
Like, I would avoid him.
I think he was scary.
What was his name?
Anthony Trump.
I've never seen him.
Exactly.
What do you mean?
He's just like a shadowy, like, boy de boss type figure.
That's what made him so like.
I knew how he looked, but I'm like, the general public wouldn't know how this man looked.
But he wielded an enormous amount of power.
I can't suggest to you how much power he had in the White House.
Sad, isn't it?
I know.
I was able to get wind of a little bit of the comments in chat.
And yes, I mean, it's pretty sad, isn't it?
Molly McFrawley, this is their front person.
It's fun to actually laugh at it.
It really is.
I mean, they are so lost.
They don't have anyone.
They really do not.
Jen Piskanki, as I like to call her, my gosh, I mean, her ratings are crashing.
MSNBC is crashing.
Now, all of a sudden, if we can convince some of the people in the Trump administration to come on shows like ours and boost the podcast, that would be really, really great.
Put these networks out of business.
Seriously, people will go to podcasts.
It's been proven time and time again.
That's another thing that I believe played a huge hand in President Trump winning the election.
True, true, true, all the way around.
But this was fun.
Elon Musk, he grills New York Slimes when asked about reporting on alleged drug use.
The same publication that got the Pulitzer Prize for false reporting on Russia Gate is what he asked him.
He just had one zinger after another.
He was great here.
He completely demolished the Russia Gate hoaxers at the New York Slimes in a response to a question in the Oval Office about the recent hit job they published about the Doge chief.
And of course, this was in the press conference on Friday, and they were commemorating Musk's last day as special government employee as head of the Department of Government Efficiency, Doge.
So on Friday morning, you had the slimes.
They published a report using anonymous sources again.
I mean, just got to love those anonymous sources, alleging that Musk, that he juggled drugs during the 2024 election cycle and he was using drugs far more intensely than previously known, and credited the eccentric billionaire's erratic behavior to potential drug abuse.
Well, they say he took ecstasy and psychedelic mushrooms and he traveled with a daily medication box that held 20 pills, including ones with the markings of a stimulant, Adderel, according to a photo of a box and people who have seen it.
This is what the Slimes is actually claiming, right?
That he had his own medicine kit.
They must be confusing that with old Joe Biden's.
I don't know.
They're having a moment, a senior moment, because at this time, it's so old.
It's gotten so ridiculous.
Well, Fox correspondent Peter Ducey was in the room.
Thank goodness for this one.
And he began asking the question.
And Musk already knew what he was going to say and cut him off.
He said, wait, is this the New York Times?
Is that the same publication that got a Pulitzer Prize for false reporting on RussiaGate?
Well, he railed against the fake news outlet.
He highlighted the failed dismal, you know, of course, of Trump's defamation case against the Pulitzer Prize board.
And of course, the far-left outlet for pushing debunked and totally falsified claims about the Russiagate hoax, which they want a Pulitzer for.
Yes, of course, they gave themselves an award just so they looked even more legit while we were all going, really?
I mean, what a joke this is.
So hopefully they're going to snag it back.
Musk went on on a brief rant about how the New York Slimes record of publishing completely fake stories, highlighting the fact that they might need to return the Pulitzer Prize.
The New York Times, let's move on, he said.
So it was funny as ever.
I mean, Ducey says, the president mentioned the U.S. deal with all of the slings and arrows during your time at Doge.
Musk responds, you know, some of the media organizations in this room were the slingers.
Ducey says, there is a New York Times report today that accuses you of blurring the lines between.
Musk says, wait, is New York Times, is that the same publication that got a Pulitzer Prize for false reporting on RussiaGate?
Is it the same organization?
I think it is.
I think the judges ruled against New York Times for their lies about the Russia Gate hoax, and they might have to give back that Pulitzer Prize.
That New York Times.
Is that the one?
Let's move on.
And it's hilarious because they are given an award.
Do you all think that they should have to return it?
Maybe I'll save that for next week's question of the day.
Although I can't promise it with all the news the way it's going, no.
So we have got our question of the day.
That is our next, where we're going next over here to hear what you all have to say about all the things that have been going on, especially with Harvard.
I mean, when you talk about how they've indoctrinated kids the way they have, my gosh.
So we're going to head on over there and see what you all have to say.
And the bonus question is: do you agree with President Trump's ban on Harvard's ability to enroll foreign students?
Yes or no?
All right, let's see.
I'm going to start at the bottom this time because I have to kind of switch this up or else I'm going to get accused of playing favorites.
I don't know about all of you, but okay, question for the crew, for the gym crew.
Are you guys getting all this nonsensical stuff?
He is a topped analyst, just awesome.
And then they're like giving you account names.
It's all kinds of trolls.
It's the weirdest thing.
I have never seen all these troll accounts.
This gentleman analyzed it very well, and they're giving me all of these other accounts to go and fall.
This is just ridiculous.
I mean, one, two, three, four, five.
What's up with all this nonsensical stuff?
I don't know.
It's wasting our space over here in our question of the day.
So Margo says, and this is at Lady Rachel 1.
I think it's Lady Rachel 1, but it's spelled L-A-D-Y-R-A-C-H-E-A-L one.
Yes, acceptance of most foreign students depends on who their parents are and how much money they can contribute to the colleges in tuition and foundation contributions.
Some are even accepted to attend for free because of who their parents are.
Are there background checks?
No.
Interesting.
Well, I mean, we know who's been running the show and we know who gets into these colleges.
Am I right or am I right?
I'm also going to do this.
I'm going to put it on this other screen so I can see your comments.
I love to see your comments when I can side-eye over there.
I do.
Every chance I get.
And so the next one I have is Diana J. Miller, who says, I agree, but I hope he expands it to all colleges.
I doubt that it is the only college that has this type of enemy enrolled there.
I would have to agree.
And that's DJ Miller, 1972.
Rennie Stack at RStack 29 says, Absolutely.
We teach those who want to do the U.S. harm.
This insanity needs to stop.
And it does.
It's hard to believe that this has happened the way it has.
And wouldn't you think that they would want American students in there?
My gosh, no.
Then you have Rennie Stack at RStack29 who says, absolutely, we teach those.
Oh, that was him.
Okay, sorry.
Space Queen is next.
1711 Kathy.
Yes.
Dixie Pritchett at Pritchett 1776 says 100%.
Then you have at DAM, F-Y-N-O, who says 100% agree yes.
Then you have Special CS1.
Yes, President Trump is doing the right thing.
Felite Admiral James at Mighty Mouse 200 says yes.
Then we have at C A D A T L I C H I with a big green check mark.
Then you have Kelly Ann A M B K J who says yes.
Now I'm going to scroll up to the middle without looking.
I have Jay Hawk at Cherokee J80 who says I don't think it goes far enough.
It should be every college that receives federal funding, all funding should be immediately halted until the curriculum changes.
I just got the newest Teachers Union magazine and it is the most radical one I have ever received.
Would love to share with you.
Wild.
We have Jenny M, and this is Patriot.
I have to always click on her because hers always gets cut off.
Patriot XV11.
She says, absolutely.
Why should our federal dollars go to fund our own demise?
Think of it.
Trump is the only one who cares about saving the America our forefathers created.
He knows this movement and these anti-American universities like Harvard are cracking our country's foundation.
Let's invest in ourselves for a change.
No doubt.
Chicken Tender at Mom of Pearl 13 says yes.
Follow Huma wasn't just about Hildebeau's lover girlfriend.
We know that.
Uma, who is soon to be a Soros.
It stands for Harvard University, Harvard University Muslim Alumni.
The left deep state can't help themselves as they ruin everything they touch, all by design.
At Jodi, Kid P says, I fully agree with our president.
We need a huge cleanup going on in all universities.
At Black Hobby Horse says yes, and add other colleges to the list.
Also, stop all government funding.
Taxes got the kids through high school.
Colleges should be able to stand on their own.
Then you have at Little Good John says, it's in USA's best interest that Harvard succeeds legally.
If limiting foreign enrollments will force Harvard to comply with the Title IX laws, I'm all for it.
Molly McFrawley at Molly McFrawley, she says, absolutely yes.
Laura Loomer agrees too.
She's exposing Harvard, enrolled daughter of Xi Xinping, and the dangers of privileged foreigners in our top educational systems.
True.
We have at G Susie 63, yes, especially after I found out a lot of them are going for free while Americans are paying a fortune.
Is that the truth?
And then we have got at Hood CPA, yes.
And we have at Truth Trump 1, yes, that is the truth.
Yes, if they take money from Americans, only Americans should be given first admission and merit-based financial assistance.
No university should be allowed to take foreign money.
These foreign countries have universities let their citizens learn there.
Limited access to our top universities, limited courses, and limited semesters, two semester limit.
A Huge Round of Applause00:03:33
And then we have at SharpChick747, who says yes.
There we go.
So that is what we got from our answers.
Very good answers, by the way.
You had a bonus that I covered a little bit earlier because my question wasn't worded properly.
I was told, and I agree.
So what we're going to do now is thank you all for being here.
I hope you all enjoyed today's show.
I absolutely love being able to be here with you every Saturday at 3 o'clock p.m. Eastern Time.
So much fun.
A huge round of applause for those that helped me to put this show together.
I mean, it takes a lot of work, and they work not only on this one, but also on the Monday through Friday show with Cat Turd in the litterbox.
And if you don't watch that show, same time, same channel, everything's the same, Monday through Friday.
So now you get a bonus show, a Saturday show, where we get to do the deep dives.
So a huge round of applause for the incredible team that works tirelessly behind the scenes.
Endless gratitude to the brilliant Patriot Penzi for crafting insightful articles and conducting meticulous research.
And to the storytelling virtuoso, Rob Playgram Sr. for delivering engaging monologues and curating the week's top stories with unmatched precision.
A special thanks to Fleet Admiral James, whose contributions enrich every aspect of what we do.
And to Megavolt007 for the invaluable ideas and countless efforts that helped drive us forward.
Finally, a standing ovation to our amazing mods, to you who foster a safe, welcoming space where we can all connect, we can share, we can spill the tea from day to day.
We are so grateful for everything that you do.
This live stream showcases the music of Bobby Troop, and it features the track Lemon Twist alongside additional selections by Julie London.
These timeless melodies have been generously shared by Nick Twit and Lank London.
Our heartfelt thanks for their contributions.
These are my very dear, dear friends that I have not been able to catch up with.
We've been trying.
We always miss their busy, I'm busy, but they are so kind and always letting me use the music.
And it makes such a difference in this show.
Just beautiful.
Just, I try to live up to what they select for the show because it's a hard, it's definitely a high bar and it's unreachable, really.
But if you would like to see the complete playlist, you can check out the video description below.
I have it all in the description.
Well, this week's tea, it has been spilled and it has been served.
Thank you all for watching and for following.
Your support absolutely means the world to me, and I wouldn't be here doing this without you.
If you haven't already, hit the follow button.
I always forget to ask you to.
Please hit it.
It helps.
It's free and it makes a big difference to this show.
Any of the conversations, the remarks, any of the comments that you have, whenever you do that, it really helps with the show and it really bumps it up.
So I appreciate you being involved and engaged.
All right.
Well, I hope you all have a wonderful rest of your weekend.
You all be safe.
Be kind to one another.
And we will see you later.
Toodle-a-doo.
Lemon Twist Wonder00:03:06
So why the top dietitians in town insist the best source of vitamin C there can be is a lemon twist.
Even the skeptic replies that here's a suggestion you can't resist.
A cool drink with ice is improved with some slices of lemon twist.
It isn't merely circumstantial evidence that the lemon is a highly healthful citrus fruit.
The most respected scientists agree with the physiologists that here's one fact you can't dispute.
Why don't you open your eyes?
Your psychosomatic ills won't persist If quick like a rabbit, you latch to the habit of lemon twist.
Waiter, don't forget that all-important Lemon twist.