CSPAN - Washington Journal Douglas Holtz-Eakin Aired: 2025-11-17 Duration: 09:55 === Affordability Challenges (09:55) === [00:00:00] Speaker Mike Johnson announced plans to schedule a floor vote after 218 members signed a discharge petition, enough to force the House to action on the bill. [00:00:09] Watch live coverage of the House on C-SPAN. [00:00:11] See the Senate on C-SPAN 2. [00:00:13] And all of our congressional coverage is available on our free video app, C-SPAN Now, and our website, c-span.org. [00:00:23] And pass precedent denominations. [00:00:25] Why are you doing this? [00:00:26] This is outrageous. [00:00:28] This is a canal clock. [00:00:30] Fridays, C-SPAN presents a rare moment of unity. [00:00:33] Ceasefire, where the shouting stops and the conversation begins. [00:00:37] Politico Playbook chief correspondent and White House Bureau Chief Dasha Burns is host of Ceasefire, bringing two leaders from opposite sides of the aisle into a dialogue. [00:00:47] Ceasefire on the network that doesn't take sides. [00:00:51] Fridays at 7 and 10 p.m. Eastern and Pacific, only on C-SPAN. [00:01:00] For former Congressional Budget Office Director, current American Action Forum President Douglas Holtz-Akin is back with us now for a focus on all things U.S. economy. [00:01:09] Mr. Holt-Aiken, I want to start with the Congressional Budget Office and its projections about the cost of the longest shutdown in U.S. history. [00:01:18] The urban shutdown cost the government, according to U.S. fourth quarter GDP reduction, some $28 billion, with maybe $14 billion of that considered unrecoverable. [00:01:31] Explain what that means and what are the biggest drivers of that loss in the fourth quarter here. [00:01:37] Sure. [00:01:38] You know, the government got shut down. [00:01:40] People didn't get paid. [00:01:42] Some got furloughed. [00:01:42] Some continued to work, but they did not get paid. [00:01:45] And that's somebody's customer. [00:01:47] So they stopped buying things. [00:01:48] And that feedback goes through the economy. [00:01:51] It diminishes both the production and the purchases of things. [00:01:56] And that's about a $28 billion price tag. [00:01:58] So it was $9 to $10 billion in direct sort of payroll that didn't go out. [00:02:04] And then it gets multiplied through the economy. [00:02:06] Now, the recoverable part is that people did want to buy a new couch, say. [00:02:10] Maybe they'll buy it in January. [00:02:12] That'll show up in the next quarter's GDP. [00:02:14] It'll be higher. [00:02:14] Because some of the workers are going to get paid at the time that they were furloughed. [00:02:18] And so a lot of things just got put off in the fourth quarter and will show up in the first quarter. [00:02:21] That's the pattern in past shutdowns. [00:02:24] Why are some things unrecoverable then? [00:02:26] Well, some things are not durable goods. [00:02:29] They are, you know, going out to dinner. [00:02:30] There's no good way to recover that. [00:02:31] You missed the chance for the birthday party or whatever it might have been. [00:02:34] And so you don't get that back. [00:02:37] If the shutdown does mean a softening in the U.S. economy in the fourth quarter, where does that leave us in January, one year into the second Trump administration? [00:02:47] So first of all, some perspective. [00:02:48] It's a $30 trillion economy. [00:02:50] So even $28 billion, which is real money in the real world, is not a dramatic movement in the U.S. economy. [00:02:58] So we don't know exactly where we are because of the government shutdown. [00:03:02] We haven't received the typical updates on the data, but we know that there's been evidence of softness. [00:03:07] Certainly in the labor market, no great evidence of a robust labor market right now. [00:03:12] That usually means that there's no great evidence of a robust business sector, and that's a sign of a relatively flat economy. [00:03:19] A headline from today's Wall Street Journal, the bond market is headed for its best year since 2020. [00:03:24] Is that a good thing or is that a bad thing? [00:03:26] It depends if you're holding bonds. [00:03:28] If the price of bonds go up and you're holding them, that's a great thing. [00:03:31] If you want to buy a bond, then the price goes up, it's a bad thing. [00:03:34] So it's like most prices in the economy. [00:03:36] It's good news if you own it. [00:03:38] It's bad news if you want to buy it. [00:03:39] Inflation usually seems like bad news from people and impacting affordability. [00:03:45] Where are we on inflation right now? [00:03:48] Last measured inflation was about 3% year over year. [00:03:52] That's the top-line consumer price index. [00:03:55] That's not high inflation by any means. [00:03:57] The bad news is we were down to 2.3%, and we've now done a U-turn and we're headed back north. [00:04:02] That's an uncomfortable position for the Fed, which has a target of 2%, wanted to get back to 2%, and has now lost ground on that battle. [00:04:10] Affordability, the key issue, according to polls in the off-year elections. [00:04:16] How do you fight the problem of affordability? [00:04:20] We spent the first hour of this program today asking yours for their suggestions and what the government could do to help them lower prices or help lower prices for them. [00:04:29] How do you fight the affordability question? [00:04:32] I think the first thing is to frame it correctly. [00:04:35] Affordability is broadly prices. [00:04:37] It's not a single price. [00:04:38] And so you do want the Fed to get inflation back to 2%. [00:04:41] You don't want to do things that make that harder. [00:04:43] And I think the president's job owning of the Fed has not been helpful, but his tariffs have been a real problem. [00:04:49] And they're the source of the upward pressure that's going to continue. [00:04:52] And so if you wanted to pick one thing, undo the tariffs. [00:04:55] I mean, that would be a big help to the Fed. [00:04:58] And if you have high prices, in the end, it's always a supply problem. [00:05:01] You need more supply. [00:05:02] That's how you bring prices down. [00:05:04] So focusing on, like, what people are buying and the president's, like, you know, most of the nation drug pricing or 50-year mortgages or all those things which are meant to manipulate a particular price, what you want is to have a broad agenda to increase supply and availability in need. [00:05:18] On Friday, the president issued an executive order rolling back tariffs on certain grocery items. [00:05:24] Is that an acknowledgment there by the Trump administration that tariffs have real costs for Americans? [00:05:31] It was a welcome return to reality on tariffs. [00:05:33] I mean, there's been this denial that Americans pay the tariffs. [00:05:36] Americans pay the tariffs. [00:05:36] They're a tax on imports, and American pays it. [00:05:39] And they have an impact on prices. [00:05:41] There's no way around it. [00:05:42] If it's a consumer good, you add the tariff to the price. [00:05:45] Prices are higher. [00:05:46] And most of our trade is actually now in intermediate goods. [00:05:49] That's a cost of doing business. [00:05:50] Businesses pass that along. [00:05:52] So we'll see, and they haven't passed all of it along yet. [00:05:54] So we will see more upward pressure on prices. [00:05:56] The more things change, the more they stay the same. [00:05:58] Affordability and inflation were issues that we heard about during the Biden administration. [00:06:04] Are there lessons for the Trump administration right now on how the Biden administration tried to address this problem and lower costs for people? [00:06:12] I think there are certainly some economic lessons, which is you do need to actually focus on supply. [00:06:20] So a classic example is housing is expensive. [00:06:23] Let's give people bigger subsidies for housing. [00:06:25] That just causes them to buy more housing. [00:06:27] And what you need is more supply of houses. [00:06:29] And that's how you deal with the affordability. [00:06:30] And that takes a lot longer, though, to come to fruition. [00:06:33] So you look for quick fixes, and sending checks out is not going to fix anything. [00:06:37] The $2,000 dividend tariffs, that's going the wrong direction. [00:06:41] That's a very Biden-esque proposal. [00:06:43] I wouldn't do that. [00:06:45] So, you know, that's one lesson. [00:06:46] The second is how you talk about it. [00:06:49] Sort of finger-pointing, demagoguing didn't work for the Biden administration. [00:06:52] Remember, shrinkflation, greedflation, all sorts of things. [00:06:56] In the end, the problem was inflation. [00:06:58] Inflation had to be dealt with. [00:06:59] And, you know, the Federal Reserve has the job of price stability in the economy, and let them do their job. [00:07:06] Douglas Holtz-Aiken is our guest in this segment of the Washington Journal. [00:07:10] He's with us until about 8.45 Eastern, another 35 minutes or so. [00:07:15] So go ahead and get your calls in. [00:07:16] A very good person to chat economic issues with. [00:07:20] The American, let me get the numbers out for folks. [00:07:22] Democrats, Republicans, Independents, it's 202, 748, 8,000 for Democrats. [00:07:27] Republicans, 202-748, 8001. [00:07:30] Independents, 202-748-8002. [00:07:33] And for folks who don't know what the American Action Forum is, remind them what you do there. [00:07:39] We are a center-right think tank. [00:07:41] We do domestic and economic policy. [00:07:44] And the niche that we try to fill is, let's write in English for non-specialists and cover the things that are happening in Congress or the agencies. [00:07:51] So we're really trying to keep track of what's going on in the policy world on a daily basis. [00:07:56] When it comes to things happening in Congress, the impetus for the shutdown, Democrats putting the cost of health care front and center. [00:08:03] Do you think extending the Affordable Care Act subsidies was something that should happen to lower the cost of health care? [00:08:12] It's not the cost of health care. [00:08:14] It's the cost of an insurance policy that covers the cost of health care. [00:08:18] So what's missing in this debate is, A, as a sense of perspective, this isn't all the subsidies and it's not all the health insurance. [00:08:25] We have 310 million Americans and this is about 20 million of them. [00:08:29] So the broader health insurance cost problem is not even on the table. [00:08:34] And in the end, insurance covers the cost of doctors and hospitals and drugs and devices and all the things that are healthcare. [00:08:41] And that's where the money is and that's what we have to control the cost of. [00:08:44] A caller earlier said, you can fix this just by going single payer. [00:08:48] Let the government be the single payer for health care and that's how you fix this problem. [00:08:53] Where are you on that? [00:08:54] I think that's the wrong direction to go. [00:08:58] The cost of health care is not who writes the check to pay the doctor, it's the cost of the doctor. [00:09:03] And we've always focused on insurance and drugs. [00:09:06] The money in the American health care system is doctors and hospitals in the end. [00:09:10] That's the vast majority of it. [00:09:11] And that's the bill we have to cover. [00:09:13] So if you were fixing health care costs are, how would you do it? [00:09:19] I've been asked this question for 25 years. [00:09:21] We still have high costs, so I don't know. [00:09:24] No, what you want to do is simple to say and hard to execute on. [00:09:29] You want to have the care coordinated. [00:09:33] You don't want people running from doctor to doctor to doctor and they don't know what the other one's doing. [00:09:38] So you want to have some sort of coordination of the care and you want to pay for outcomes, not for doing things to people. [00:09:43] For a long time, we just paid fee for service. [00:09:45] You go in, you get paid, and it's an incentive to do more things. [00:09:48] If the person's healthy and you get paid, that's the outcome you want. [00:09:52] And then you have to have some incentive to do that at a reasonable cost.