All Episodes
June 30, 2025 18:11-18:37 - CSPAN
25:29
State Department Spokesperson Holds Briefing
Participants
Main
t
tammy bruce
15:51
Appearances
Clips
a
adam goodman
r 00:04
|

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
Right coming together to talk and argue.
And you guys do a great service in that.
I love C-SPAN too.
That's why I'm here today.
Answer questions all day, every day.
Sometimes I get to do fun things like go on C-SPAN.
adam goodman
C-SPAN is, I think, one of the very few places that Americans can still go.
unidentified
C-SPAN has such a distinguished and honorable and important mandate and mission in this country.
I love this show.
This is my favorite show to do of all shows because I actually get to hear what the American people care about.
American people have access to their government in ways that they did not before the cable industry provided C-SPAN access.
That's why I like to come on C-SPAN is because this is one of the last places where people are actually having conversations, even people who disagree.
Shows that you can have a television network that can try to be objective.
Thank C-SPAN for all you do.
It's one of the reasons why this program is so valuable because it does bring people together where dissenting voices are heard, where hard questions are asked, and where people have to answer to them.
State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce held a briefing with reporters and answered questions about U.S. foreign policy, including on Israel's conflicts with Hamas and Iran.
tammy bruce
Happy Monday.
I'll explain in a moment.
I will explain in a moment.
Thank you for being here.
It's a Monday, and I will be a little short today as the president is beginning some signings at the White House and the Oval Office.
We don't want to conflict.
So forgive me in that regard.
But I do have a few announcements for you here, and we'll start.
President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio continue to deliver on this administration's vision of peace through strength, resolute diplomacy backed by principled leadership.
On June 27th, Secretary Rubio, Under Secretary Allison Hooker, and Senior Advisor Mossad Boulos hosted the ministerial signing of a landmark peace agreement between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Rwanda.
The agreement marks a historic milestone for the Great Lakes region, bringing an end to a 30-year war.
The United States, in coordination with the African Union, Qatar, and Togo, will continue supporting full implementation of this comprehensive peace deal to pave the way for mutual prosperity.
Tomorrow, Secretary Rubio will welcome his Quad counterparts from Australia, India, and Japan to Washington to reaffirm our shared commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific.
This ministerial reinforces our joint resolve to defend sovereignty, strengthen regional maritime security, and build resilient supply chains.
And as you may know, today President Trump will issue a new executive order lifting U.S. sanctions on Syria, reaffirming his belief that the Syrian people deserve a future of safety and prosperity.
This policy reflects the President's conviction that American leadership can unlock new paths to regional stability.
Finally, the department's Middle East Task Force ended its activities on Friday, June 27th.
U.S. embassies and consulates throughout the region are open and providing routine and emergency consular services.
The department also continues to share information and updates with U.S. citizens affected by the conflict.
As of today, we have sent nearly 100 security alerts since the onset of the crisis.
Additionally, a total of 16 flights departed Israel with over 650 U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents and their accompanying immediate family members.
We are grateful to our partners in the region, particularly Greece, Italy, and Cyprus, for welcoming U.S. citizens on these assisted departure flights and to our partners in Qatar and around the world.
It is a good thing to be able to say that today to you.
I now welcome your questions.
All right.
Yes.
Umaira, not that you have anything ever on your mind.
Let's do it.
unidentified
Thank you, Tammy.
tammy bruce
Yes, ma'am.
unidentified
So a couple of questions.
One on Israel, actually.
I was going to ask about Syria, but I'll get to it later.
So Herod's newspaper last week reported that Israel's military advocate general has ordered an investigation into possible war crimes over allegations that Israeli forces deliberately fired at Palestinian civilians near Gaza aid distribution sites.
These are the ones that GHF does, as you know.
And then today, Israeli military acknowledged that Palestinian civilians were harmed at these aid distribution centers.
So I'm wondering, in light of these assessments, is the administration going to rethink allocating that money to GHF?
tammy bruce
Well, I think the answer to that certainly is no.
What we do expect, and the IDF and Israel have announced that they are, of course, investigating certain incidents.
It is a good time for a reminder here that Hamas is responsible for the current situation in Gaza.
They, of course, initiated the attacks on October 7th.
They continue to refuse to lay down their arms or to free the remaining hostages, including the remains of two Americans, and use violence to interfere with aid deliveries to the people of Gaza who are in dire need of food and aid.
So in the meantime, I think that we also have to recognize that, of course, this remains a war zone effectively.
There are four sites working for the GHF.
We are coming up to, I think, about 51 million meals distributed.
It is certainly not easy.
There are efforts in those on the ground who do not want this to be a success, who have made the lives of the people of Gaza miserable for decades now.
And this is a key unlocking a door to a better future.
So this is what the President has asked for, which is a new approach for Gaza.
There is a demand, understandably, for aid to get in.
The GHF is doing that.
And as we also, of course, decry loss of life and the violence that continues.
But that's why we do what we do and we continue to work for a ceasefire as well.
unidentified
Yeah, I understand all that.
A quick follow-up on that.
I completely understand what you're saying.
But does the administration have any concern about this?
I mean, these are like Israeli, like these are Israeli authorities accepting that Palestinians have been harmed.
Perhaps, is the administration thinking about talking to GHF for risk mitigation?
tammy bruce
Yes, well, I won't get into the details of the conversations that are had.
Obviously, you know that our work there doesn't stop.
We continue on.
We're still working.
The President noted the other day that there's potential for a ceasefire.
We look forward to that.
Clearly, it's been maybe a little over a week since American power and Donald Trump's leadership has changed the Middle East forever.
So there's still more to do.
We recognize that Israel is doing the appropriate thing with investigating certain allegations.
And we certainly, like everyone else, will be watching that.
And at the same time, we also know that there are people on the ground who want to disrupt and disturb the success of this because of the nature of this industrial complex that has allowed this to go on for decades.
So we are working to get aid in, at the same time, still working for that ceasefire, still hoping to make the difference for Gaza.
And of course, I think our action and the issues with Iran speak to our commitment to changing the Middle East so people can live in peace.
Andrea Mitchell.
unidentified
Thank you so much.
A related follow-up.
Acknowledging that obviously Hamas started this on October 7th and since and broke the ceasefire and are still holding hostages.
And some of us have not only witnessed the October 7th video, the IDF visit video, but the subsequent NOVA video, which is profoundly disturbing.
Acknowledging all of that.
tammy bruce
Yes, ma'am.
unidentified
How does the President's aspirations for a ceasefire, now that the landscape has been changed appreciably, how is that affected by the Israeli strikes in Gaza City today?
Does he view any of that with alarm?
Are there conversations?
tammy bruce
I would caution that with reports from the area that we in fact honor the fact that there are investigations and to wait for actual facts that I think will be very useful.
Again, at the same time, we know the President has an excellent relationship with Bibi Netanyahu, that we, in fact, have made a commitment.
He has from the beginning of this administration to change that environment.
And that commitment remains.
Certainly, we know the story is that 51 million meals have been distributed through the region, through Gaza.
We also know the President has called for new ideas.
This is part of that.
And the regional partners are acting on that as well.
We know this can't continue.
Israel is an ally of ours.
We, of course, I'm not going to discuss or presume to know the conversations the president's having.
That is his prerogative.
unidentified
May I just click on that?
tammy bruce
Yes, ma'am.
unidentified
I may have been imprecise.
I was not referring to any strikes on the age of food delivery.
I was referring to separate strikes that have been reported in the north in Gaza City that resulted in several casualties.
tammy bruce
Well, again, this is a war zone.
Hamas has still not put down their weapons.
We had a ceasefire, which they violated, and refused to engage in another one.
We continue, despite all of that, to get another ceasefire, but the ceasefire was broken by Hamas.
It's a war.
To speak about the specifics of what Israel is doing, I would direct you to the Israeli government.
And I think it's important to recognize that this is a process that is ongoing.
Our role in this is to help ease the suffering as much as we can.
And certainly part of that is going to hopefully get a ceasefire.
President is optimistic, and so we will be as well.
Matt Lee maybe has a question.
Thank you, sir.
unidentified
Yes, I do.
I do want to ask about Syria, but first, I just want to very, very briefly.
tammy bruce
I might want to go on and on.
unidentified
How do you decide?
Well, my question is going to be very, very short.
Oh, all right.
Yes.
How do you decide when it's okay to speak about Rubik revoking someone's visa?
Because for years and years and years, decades in fact, in covering this building, it's always the mantra has been visa records are confidential.
And yet we have a situation where an entertainer in the UK has had his visa revoked very publicly by the Deputy Secretary of State in a tweet tweeted by Secretary Rubio and confirmed by other officials.
So what's the deal with this law?
Does it not really apply even unless you want it to, unless you don't want to talk about it?
tammy bruce
Well, yeah, I can't speak to the decisions at the times of when to discuss something of this sort.
What we do know is a very public dynamic with individuals.
We have a very public policy and procedure and process now that we're discussing regarding national security and how we are handling the visa process.
In this particular case, of course, what you're referring to is the tweet from our Deputy Secretary of State, Christopher Landau, that the State Department has revoked the U.S. visas for the members of the Bob Villen band in light of their hateful tirade at Glastonbury, including leading the crowd in death chants.
Foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors to our country.
Now, we've stated that, that when it comes to how we vet people, if they are going to be coming here to be helpful, to be nice people, to be great tourists, or if they're coming for other reasons, that every sovereign nation has a right to decide who's going to come to this country.
So we've been public about that standard.
And this was a very public event that violated, as you've seen from the Deputy Secretary's tweet, that very basic standard about the nature of who we want to let into the country.
That's all right.
It is important the American people support us taking care about who comes here.
And I think his tweet and the Secretary's language and his approach on the policy speaks for itself.
unidentified
Okay, so basically if it's a public kind of facing thing, then you're okay with it.
tammy bruce
Oh, I didn't say that.
I said in this case that that's what has occurred.
And I think that the policy certainly is clear for individuals, but when we're thinking about the nature of the policy itself that has been publicly discussed, they chose to do so this time.
unidentified
And then just also very briefly on Syria, there is, as you mentioned, the President's going to be signing this executive order shortly in the next 10, 15 minutes or so.
Can you give us an idea with the State Department component of the impact of what this will do?
What is state?
Because I know it's Treasury and commerce all involved.
So what happens at the State Department after this EO is signed?
tammy bruce
Well, it is sanctions and aspects like that, of course, belong to the Treasury.
A lot of people don't know that, that they're the ones who manage that, with the application and the nature of what occurs.
I will repeat what my colleague Caroline said just a little bit ago about this event.
The President is going to sign an executive order to terminate the U.S. sanctions program on Syria.
And this is in an effort to promote and support the country's path towards stability and peace.
The order will remove sanctions on Syria while maintaining sanctions on the former President Assad, his associates, human rights abusers, drug traffickers, persons linked to chemical weapons activities, ISIS members and their affiliates, and Iranian proxies.
Again, this is an action that the President has promised and shocked the world within Saudi Arabia because when he first announced this plan, he is committed to supporting a Syria that is stable, united, and at peace with itself and its neighbors.
So in this particular application, of course, this is about the Treasury.
It's about the White House and certainly our special envoy, Ambassador Barrick, and his now application and work getting that country back on its fees, on its feet.
All right, Sean.
unidentified
Can I go back to the music a bit?
tammy bruce
Yes, sir.
unidentified
On Glastonbury, just getting to the decision to revoke the visas.
Members of this administration, particularly the Vice President, have been very vocal about free expression, saying that even if things are hateful, particularly if the Vice President takes a task, Germany and to a certain extent the UK saying that there are laws that prohibit hateful content and insults, that those are inappropriate.
What's the difference here?
I mean, I'm not justifying, I'm not supporting the law.
The President is a ban.
But why is it that this speech is out of law and while you have, there's at the same time a push not to outlaw free expression elsewhere in the Communist States?
tammy bruce
Right.
I think that again, this is not about the nature of a concert, I suppose, but it really is about our standards, about who we let in the country.
That we're not telling people what they can sing about or what they can say.
That's not involved here at all.
They obviously felt free to say what they were saying and chanting at Glastonbury, and they can do that.
And we can do what we do.
So it really is about the issue of national security, about issues of violence, the increase certainly of anti-Semitism, but of terrorism in general.
That dynamic, the crime in the United States, what happened with the open border, the transnational gangs that are here, this kind of wanton dynamic that has ruined American lives, that has created cities that are unlivable, and every American deserves better.
They deserve to know they have leadership, as we do now.
And that's why they voted for Donald Trump, was simple, basic law and order, respect for your neighbor, and if you're coming to this country, respect for the people who are here.
So I think that when we think about who we, why you have a visa system, which is in part to vet and to stop and to ask questions, is to take that seriously.
unidentified
Well, can I just say, in one other case, a free expression, Hungary, Prime Minister Orban, who, of course, is a co-sally the president, tried to ban a pride parade this weekend.
Tens of thousands and hundreds of thousands of people came out.
Does the U.S. have a view on that?
Do you think that it's justified to ban an LGBTQ pride parade?
tammy bruce
Well, you know, when the Vice President or any of us speak about the nature of policy or I think what's important regarding freedom of expression, that's our plan and what we feel is important to convey.
And then what countries do is their business.
Events happen all over the world, as we know, every day, which the United States has no comment about.
And we have nothing to add on this matter.
But again, I think it's about what countries do, the choices they make with their nations, and what citizens do and how they respond to that.
unidentified
With respect, I mean, the U.S. did criticize the UK over bans on anti-abortion protesters.
Is there any contradiction in that?
tammy bruce
Well, again, I'm not going to speak to individual situations or instances or comments that are made.
Again, we have events that happen all the time all over the world, which might be worth commenting on, but we don't comment on all of them, I think, for a very good reason.
Yes, sir.
unidentified
On events happening all over the world.
In Nigeria recently, more than 200 people were slaughtered earlier this month in a series of attacks on Christian villages by Islamic militants.
Some 6,000 were displaced.
What's the state doing to address this?
Is there anything state can do to address this?
tammy bruce
Well, I can't speak about what is being discussed now or is in any kind of diplomatic conversations or planning, etc.
But I'm going to be briefing again on Wednesday.
Today is a unique week because we have the Quad with the Secretary tomorrow, which I'll be a part of.
So we'll be briefing on Wednesday.
Let's take that back and find out where that stands and what our plans are.
I'll have that for you.
Yes, sir.
unidentified
Thank you, Don.
More to Ukraine, if I may.
Russians are stepping up their air attacks on Ukraine, which happened to be larger than ever before.
The President of Friday addressed Ukraine issues, and he said that Putin, quote, unquote, respects our country again.
Well, hours after that, Putin unleashed the largest ever attack on Ukraine.
Do you think Russia respects President Trump?
tammy bruce
I'm sorry, do I think?
unidentified
Do you think Russia respects President Trump?
President Trump says that.
They respect me next hours, next thing we see, hours after that, they launch the largest concern.
tammy bruce
Well, again, I've certainly, for obvious reasons, refuse to characterize the most powerful man in the world who is saving this country and the world at this time, but I can tell you other things that he has said.
Most recently on the 25th.
He said, I consider him, Putin, a person that's been misguided.
I'm very surprised, actually.
I thought we would have had that settled, talking about certain issues.
He also said he called the other day.
He said, Can I help you with Iran?
I said, No, no, you can help me with Russia.
You help me to get a settlement with you, with Russia, and I think we're going to be able to get that done too.
And also on Putin's ambitions regarding Ukraine.
He said, You know, I know one thing is that he'd like to settle.
He'd like to get out of this thing.
It's a mess for him.
So, the President, in negotiating and dealing with some of the worst conflicts, certainly that we've ever had, the carnage that is going on, the President is the one person who's been able to bring everyone to the table, who's willing to talk to everyone, who has the power of the United States at his back, and the support of the American people.
And I think that he understands, and he has repeated again within the last few days, just his frustration and lack of acceptance at the attacks that have gone on in Ukraine by Russia, and that it has to stop, that there are too many people dying.
This remains a key element for his administration.
It is a key part for the work that his administration as all is doing: our support for Ukraine and the need for that carnage to stop.
unidentified
For some of us, when I covered President Strip last week, and you addressed from the podium his signature achievement, which is 5% of GDP spending among NATO members, Lavrov today called it catastrophic, and he said that defense spending decision could lead, quote-unquote, NATO's collapse.
How do you lead that?
tammy bruce
Yes, I'm not going to speak to that, but what we do know is what apparently bothers Russia is the fact that NATO is going to be strongly returning to its original roots of being a deterrent.
And that is what NATO's job has been.
The advancement of their commitment to defense is remarkable.
And not only it's, we, of course, support NATO completely, and their role is imperative for a safe and stable Europe.
And that's the point: being a deterrent.
This kind of defense spending helps them achieve that.
And, of course, it is something that would not have happened without President Trump's encouragement and demand.
And so we're excited about that.
Yes, sir, in the back there.
unidentified
Thank you very much.
Two quick questions.
Some regional sources said this week or next week, the U.S. representative to Syria will meet Maslom Khobani and Prime Minister Massouri Barzani in Erbil.
Can you update us about that?
tammy bruce
No, I can't speak to any ongoing meetings or meetings that may or may not be coming up.
unidentified
And second question about Iran.
Iran's representative to the United Nations has said that the conditions are not favorable for negotiation with the United States.
What is your end and what is your message?
Would you like to send to the Iranian people?
tammy bruce
Well, to the Iranian people, of course, as we've always been saying, is that every country is in the hands of its own people.
When it comes to what Iran's leadership is saying of what's left of it, the President's words and the President's position is the one that prevails here.
It is his guiding hand, and he has been very transparent about his opinion, his desire for Iran to move into the normal order with countries, but also his awareness that, as he has stated, that he continues to be willing to do whatever is necessary to make sure there's peace in the region.
And now, this is the unusual point because of the president's schedule.
It is 30 past the hour.
I'm going to wrap it up today, but I will see you again on Wednesday.
And you know how to reach me here.
I think I've got an email.
All right, thank you, everyone.
Have a great day.
I appreciate it.
unidentified
Thank you.
tammy bruce
Thanks for your patience.
unidentified
Have you seen anything on the wrist?
tammy bruce
No.
unidentified
I feel compelled to- We're taking a live look now inside the Senate chamber where members are considering the GOP tax and spending cuts bill.
Lawmakers are holding a so-called Votorama, allowing an unlimited number of amendments in a marathon series.
Today's Votorama follows a weekend Senate session where Democrats requested a full reading of the 940-page bill.
If passed by the upper chamber, the House could come back as soon as Wednesday morning.
President Trump has set July 4th as the deadline for Congress to pass the bill.
Watch live coverage of the U.S. Senate on C-SPAN 2.
C-SPAN now, our free mobile app or online at c-span.org.
Stop using veterans as political pawns.
The best thing we can do is democracy.
It isn't just an idea, it's a process.
A process shaped by leaders elected to the highest offices and entrusted to a select few with guarding its basic principles.
It's where debates unfold, decisions are made, and the nation's course is charted.
Democracy in real time.
This is your government at work.
This is C-SPAN, giving you your democracy unfiltered.
C-SPAN shop.org is C-SPAN's online store.
Browse through our latest collection of C-SPAN products, apparel, books, home decor, and accessories.
There's something for every C-SPAN fan, and every purchase helps support our non-profit operations.
Shop now or anytime at c-spanshop.org.
Next, law professors discuss the implications for free speech as Congress moved to ban the app TikTok and the legal action that followed.
Export Selection