Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
Source
Participants
Main
jake tapper
cnn08:02
Appearances
p
pedro echevarria
cspan01:31
?
Voice
Speaker
Time
Text
Election Day Revelations00:08:39
unidentified
In a nation divided, a rare moment of unity, this fall, C-SPAN presents Ceasefire, where the shouting stops and the conversation begins in a town where partisan fighting prevails.
One table, two leaders, one goal, to find common ground.
This fall, ceasefire on the network that doesn't take sides, only on C-SPAN.
What was the decision-making that went on behind having somebody who was so clearly not up to the task of running for president decide he was going to run for reelection?
So we got to work and we made a list of more than 200 people, Democrats, people who work for the White House and the administration and Congress, donors, et cetera, and talked to as many people as we could to figure out what happened.
And the result is this book, Original Sin, which goes into what a lot of Democrats feel like was the biggest mistake, which was President Biden deciding he was going to run for reelection, and then the mistakes that followed, which include, of course, the effort by him, his family, and his top aides to hide the degree to which he was cognitively deteriorating as we saw the night of the debate.
And the book has been selling very well, and the reviews from the New York Times and the Washington Post, LA Times, et cetera, have been very positive.
And, you know, anytime anybody does anything in this day and age, I don't need to tell you, there's going to be criticism from the left and the right.
unidentified
But generally speaking, we're really pleased with the reception to the book.
And I guess as a follow-up, what was the tension between perhaps you and your co-author of collecting this material, holding on to it for a book, but not releasing it previous to the election?
unidentified
Well, we didn't start writing the book until after the election.
So this book was, there was no book until the day after the election when Alex and I got together and started working on the proposal and then started doing the reporting.
unidentified
So there isn't anything in this book that we knew before Election Day at all.
And in fact, I mean, Alex and I often joke about this because I know there's this perception that there are a lot of writers who save the best stuff for after the election.
I don't know how true that is, but it's certainly not the case for me and Alex.
And we joke about the fact that if we had known any one of these, any one of the scoops in the book, for instance, the fact that George Clooney didn't think that President Biden recognized him the night of that June 2024 fundraiser, if we'd known that at the time, any one of us, either one of us, would have loved to have reported that at the time.
But the truth was that President Biden and his family and his top aides convinced the Democratic Party that one, only he had ever beat Donald Trump, which is true.
Two, therefore only he could beat Donald Trump in 2024, which I don't know is true, but that was their argument.
And that three, Donald Trump, in their view, posed an existential threat to the nation.
And so if you convince yourself of those three facts, you can pretty much justify anything.
And any criticism of President Biden was therefore really kept quiet during the presidential campaign by Democrats because they were afraid that any admission that he was slipping behind the scenes would only help Donald Trump.
But after Election Day, finally, people that Alex and I had been reaching out to either started returning our calls or our texts or our emails or started being a lot more candid.
unidentified
But there's nothing in the book that we knew before Election Day.
If you started writing after Election Day, when did you know, what was the moment when you both figured out you were onto something as far as the theme of this book?
unidentified
Well, I'll admit that when we proposed the book, we didn't know how much good stuff we were going to get.
But it was just, I probably within the first few weeks, we would just check back with each other after and share the notes that we had with each interview and realize that, oh my God, it was much worse than we thought.
And it was, and we traced the first time that President Biden showed some signs of decline, according to a top aide, was 2015, towards the end of his vice presidency with Barack Obama as president.
And it was just tracking all of the developments as seen through these top aides who felt like this a burden had been lifted, that they could be honest about what they had seen.
As far as sourcing is concerned, one of the critics, and you've probably seen this already, Naomi Biden herself on the book saying it relies on unnamed anonymous sources pushing a self-serving false narrative that absolves them of any responsibility for our current national nightmare.
What was your reaction to that?
unidentified
I mean, Naomi Biden is the president's granddaughter, and she's going to defend her grandfather.
The Biden family is a very tight-knit family, and they support each other.
So that removing Naomi from it, because I'm not going to criticize a young woman defending her grandfather, there are a lot of anonymous sources in the book.
unidentified
There are named sources as well.
It's pretty well sourced for anybody who reads it.
Some of the anonymous sources are, like for instance, we have a number of cabinet secretaries who are identified in the book as Cabinet Secretary number one, Cabinet Secretary number two.
And I don't, I mean, I imagine that they are remaining relatively anonymous because they don't want to experience the wrath of angry Democrats or the Biden family.
unidentified
What is more important, I think, is what these sources told us.
For example, there are cabinet secretaries in the book who told us that they didn't think towards the end of the Biden presidency that President Biden could be relied upon for that proverbial 2 a.m. phone call in the middle of the night with the national security emergency.
Now, why the cabinet secretaries don't want to go on the record for that, that's probably because they don't want to experience the wrath and the harshness of Democrats criticizing them.
But it's still, I think, more important than the issue of whether or not of who the sources are and why some of them are anonymous.
So one of the things that we've learned from talking to top aides is that a lot of the diminishment in President Biden's cognitive ability seems to have come, and this is not unusual, but it seems to have come during periods of real intense stress.
Hunter's Tragedy Impact00:03:09
unidentified
And obviously Joe Biden is somebody that has withstood a lot in his life.
It's one of the reasons why his supporters love him so much.
He's somebody that is able to get off the floor after life throws some of the cruelest twists of fate imaginable.
In 2015, he lost his beloved son, Bo, the Attorney General of Delaware, to brain cancer.
And a top aide told us that it was like watching then Vice President Biden's psyche was like watching somebody pour water on sand.
And that kind of horrific family tragedy really had a powerful, deleterious effect on President, then Vice President Biden.
We're also told that two of the most intense moments of diminishment, according to top aides, occurred in 2023 and 2024 during his presidency during moments of intense stress for his son Hunter, who I'm sure your viewers and callers know had some legal problems.
In 2023, he had a plea deal for a gun charge, and that plea deal fell through.
And then in the summer, in June 2024, he was tried and convicted, Hunter Biden, of that gun charge.
And what's significant, and I don't say this with anything other than sympathy for the family, but what's significant is that Hunter Biden, who as we all know, has also experienced tragedy in his family losing his brother.
unidentified
President Biden, of course, lost his wife and daughter in 1972 in a car crash.
The Hunter Biden, in addition, struggles with addiction, a horrible disease.
And Hunter was very outspoken during the period of 2023-2024, saying that he thought that the Republicans and those who were prosecuting him were trying to drive him into relapse and trying to drive him to suicide.
And what we ascertained from our reporting is that that fear that President Biden had, a very real, understandable and tragic fear that he would lose a third child, that he would lose Hunter, that was to a large degree one of the other reasons why his cognitive abilities declined in the summer of 2023 and the summer of 2024.
And that explains a lot about, in fact, why his performance at the debate was so awful, because that came right after that verdict, the guilty verdict of Hunter in Delaware.
And also why the decision was so bad and not well thought out because his decline was so significant in 2023-2024.