Yeah, the trip was really intended to make sure that we were standing up for due process and for every person within our borders rights to due process.
And Kilmar Obrego-Garcia was a key figure because the Supreme Court, in a 9-0 ruling, had ordered the president and the administration to facilitate Mr. Obrego-Garcia's return.
The lack of action to that end should be concerning to every one of us because it appears that the president and this administration does not value the right to due process that all people have, not just citizens.
Every person in our borders has that right and we are not abiding by that right and we wanted to make sure that we were advocating and showing up as leaders at the legislative level, federal level, to make sure that it was clear that that is not in line with our values as Americans or with our Constitution.
We suspected that that might end up being the case.
We did not go there, you know, expecting that everyone was going to make sure that we had access.
We were on a no-dell.
It was not an official congressional delegation trip.
So we knew that there would be more challenges, but we wanted to make sure that we went to El Salvador, people saw that we were advocating, and that we, frankly, had press coverage that would elevate this in the public's eye, and I think we were successful.
The Hill reports that minority leader Jeffries was pushing back against criticism of Democratic representatives going to El Salvador.
You know, initially it said that he didn't want you guys to go and then push back against that.
And I mean, what have you heard from your leadership on the Democratic side about these visits and whether or not they're distracting from the agenda of focusing on the economy?
Yeah, let me just cover what I really believe is important here.
We went because due process is guaranteed within the U.S. Constitution.
That is not something that we can control directly.
How due process is carried out is not within the legislative branch's interest.
That is the judiciary.
What we had to do was stand up for the rights that are guaranteed to all people in the United States.
How Donald Trump is perceived is Donald Trump's doing.
Donald Trump may be perceived as good in some areas and not in others, and that is just for each American to decide how they feel about the leadership.
I personally am very concerned about the authoritarian-like actions by this administration.
Ignoring a Supreme Court 9-0 ruling should be a wake-up call for Americans.
So how people are perceiving this, we are a divided country right now, and that is really part of the problem.
Centering kindness and centering compassion for all people is absolutely something that I would continue and will continue to advocate for, and making sure that people have their basic rights is core to that.
You know, we're all getting lost in the chaos, and it's so exhausting.
I can't even stand the thought of having to vote in another election because it's not doing any good.
We've got some good legislators, but they are not, they're not making the point anything worthwhile.
It's all talk.
When I saw Schumer answer a question last week, and I can't even remember what the question was, it was a ballot question, and he had a one-word answer.
And I thought, okay, that does it.
We need some new leadership.
We need some lawsuits.
This guy down in El Salvador, aren't there some lawsuits, something that the legislator can do?
But there just seems like they're just, I don't know, we're not a one-party system anymore.
They say, okay, the Democrats are the only one that's doing what's normal or trying to be honest.
Well, honestly, it's like they're doing it in a half-assed way.
Excuse my language.
It's not consistently proactive.
It's like, sit back and whine.
Okay, let's do something.
Sit back and, I mean, it's just like we're lost.
This country deserves feeling the burn with these tariffs.
The people don't, but the country led by a bunch of, I don't know what their agenda is, but it's not good.
You know, the first thing I want to reflect back is our callers' frustration and sheer fatigue.
I think that is really relevant to what I'm hearing from my constituents.
People very much are exhausted by all of this.
And they also are really concerned about what they think is a lack of clear leadership.
So what your caller is saying is very much what a lot of people are feeling.
But what I also want to say is Democrats in the minority are doing what we can for our districts.
And centering our districts is what we all are here to do.
My title and my job description are one and the same.
It's representative.
And so I am being very responsive to my district.
And I think when you do that, there isn't the same message coming out of the Democratic Party right now because we all have different districts.
And that is frustrating, I think, right now.
When the country wants a leader with clear direction, we absolutely have a leader with, you know, some clarity of what he's trying to do in the executive branch.
And what we are doing is trying to hold steady to American values and our constituents and make sure that people know that we are responding.
In my district, people demanded that I go to El Salvador.
They are concerned about democracy.
That is out and above everything else in my district, what people are concerned about.
So I am responding and acting with them at the center.
And I have every reason to believe that my colleagues across the country are doing exactly the same.
Those are the two most important roles I've had until coming to Congress.
And when I came, what is clear is there's a GOP doctors caucus that's been around a long time and there's been predominantly more Republicans in office who are also physicians.
We as Democratic physicians, there's now six of us, felt that we needed to have a collective response, especially in these times where things like Medicaid are really in jeopardy, where reproductive rights are being eliminated across this country.
We have to have a voice that centers patients, which we have done our whole careers as physicians and brings our patients to the center of policymaking, which is not what Congress is necessarily well known for.
Our health care system does not serve the people, it serves special interests and different groups who have something to gain from the system.
It should be centering people, and that is what we are failing to do, and it's what the Doctors Caucus is here to work on.
First-time caller, long-time listener, just for FYI.
But my question was more so in regards to the tariff.
I wanted to know that once, would you guys be able to do a petition or something of that sort to make it so that this doesn't become the new norm and baseline so that now everything that we're arguing for is not put in like vein or whatever?
So, Clarence, sorry, you want to know if the congresswoman can do anything about stopping the tariffs?
unidentified
No, no, no, I'm not worried about the tariffs being stopped.
I understand the tariff is going to do what the tariffs are going to do.
But my question is: once this becomes the new norm and becomes a new baseline for companies, would she be able to put something in act to make it so that companies cannot say this is their new baseline, that they have to go back to like lower prices?
Because if not, then everybody arguing about having tariffs and trying to lower the prices is not going to happen because companies are not going to go and say, Hey, we got this record high of money.
Now, let's go ahead and make it so we can go back to the good old-fashioned times when money cheap things were cheaper and you know, we got your question.