Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
Source
Participants
Main
steve bannon
r12:33
Appearances
b
ben smith
03:49
Clips
barack obama
d00:02
bill clinton
d00:02
donald j trump
admin00:19
george h w bush
r00:02
george w bush
r00:04
jimmy carter
d00:03
ronald reagan
r00:01
?
Voice
Speaker
Time
Text
Budget Cuts And Tax Increases00:15:06
unidentified
And then our live coverage of the White House Correspondents Association dinner begins at 8 p.m. Eastern.
Watch C-SPAN's live coverage of the White House Correspondents Association dinner Saturday, starting at 6 p.m. Eastern online and then live on C-SPAN at 8 p.m. Eastern.
C-SPAN, Democracy Unfiltered.
We're funded by these television companies and more, including Buckeye Broadband.
Buckeye Broadband supports C-SPAN as a public service, along with these other television providers, giving you a front row seat to democracy.
Steve Bannon, who served in the first Trump administration, spoke about populism, trade policy, taxation, and Elon Musk during the Semaphore News 2025 World Economy Summit.
He was also critical of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.
This is about 20 minutes.
Please welcome Steve Bannon, chief strategist to the 45th president and founder and host of Bannon's War Room.
And Ben Smith, co-founder and editor-in-chief, Semaphore.
And I guess, you know, just to get straight to today's news, the markets are up like, I think Dow's up like a thousand points.
On the suggestion that Donald Trump is going to totally sell you out and everything you believe about decoupling from China in exchange for, you know, for keeping the trade flows going.
I mean, are the markets up too much?
Should people be selling if they believe that?
unidentified
It's irrelevant to me, the daily trading of the stock exchange.
The Chinese Communist Party has been at economic war with us for 20 years.
And if you look at what they've broken, they've gamed the World Trade Organization most favored nation.
The cyber deal Obama cut with them in 2015.
They never lived up to.
The Hong Kong in 2019, they walked away.
President Trump worked for two years with Lighthizer, had that amazing deal, took all the seven original sins of the Chinese Communist Party economics away and integrated us into a total global economy.
In fact, right when we walked in here, Caroline Levitt came out and says it's not going to be any unitary unilateral walkdown, right, to 50%.
Now, I will tell you about President Trump, he went up the escalatory ladder quickly, right to 125 and 145.
But this is a long, tough process.
So I think people trading on this every day is just the computers or the algorithms or folks.
I think you have to see that he's bound and determined to, number one, treat this as a premium market, where if you don't bring your manufacturing back here, you're going to have to pay a premium to get to this market.
Like you buy a premium skybox at a sporting event or front row at a concert.
He sees a premium.
If you bring your manufacturing back, it's a different deal.
But this is a long, tough fight.
It's not going to be solved.
You know, and the media is running around the market, stock market, this.
It's very complicated.
And we're dug in.
It's a battle between two systems.
If you think their system is going to win, you're kidding yourself.
It's not.
We're going to win this.
The American people are going to win it.
And Lao Beijing, the common man in China, is going to win it also.
I think they should do what they're talking about doing, because the only thing that makes the math work, this is not about Newt Gingrich and Gerber Norcross and all these guys lighting their hair on fire about this is Bush in 92.
It's not.
Bush had a tax increase for everybody.
This is a massive tax cut for working class and middle class people.
Not only do you extend the tax that President Trump has, but no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security, that can lead us to other tax relief for the middle class and the working class.
We've got to remember, the entire global system rests on their shoulders.
They are the full faith and credit of the United States.
Not the Federal Reserve, not the SEC, not all you guys, not the hedge funds, not the government, the people of this country.
And they've been getting stiffed in a system that works against them.
Remember, we've gutted out the United States from the high-paying manufacturing jobs, and yet the world system works with their security guarantee everywhere in the world, from NATO to the Middle East to the South China Sea up to Japan.
And it's their kids.
So what should happen, and the only way the math works, at our growth rates, and the IMF says today it's 1.8 instead of 2.5, is you extend the tax cuts for the working class and middle class.
You give them the additional tax cuts.
And millionaires, I think President Trump's concept is the millionaire people making $1 million and above, so it's not the whole upper bracket.
They increase to 40%.
And I think the tax foundation, it's got up on Bloomberg right now.
That's about $400 billion over 10 years.
So it's $40 billion a year.
And I think that's just the first, and this is not President Trump's idea, but I think the carried interest has got to go away.
This whole phony thing about putting your stock in these foundations tax-free has to go away.
I actually think there should be taxes on financial transactions.
I think there's all types of populist economic policies.
And with Dick Durbin announcing he's not running again, I think you see that MAGA is going to be here for a while because I think he's basically telling you the Senate is not going to flip to the Democratic Party.
And there's a massive skepticism on the Hill that a Republican Party for generations was elected to cut taxes on every tax bracket, but a lot at the top.
And when you talk to legislators, I mean, I think our Capitol Hill editor told me she would literally eat her hat on a Zoom call if they do this because they're so dug in.
Behind the scenes, people understand because the math doesn't work.
If you don't have massive cuts to spending, and I'm talking about discretionary spending, if you don't start the Pentagon and take a couple hundred billion dollars off the trillion-dollar budget, if you then don't go to some of the discretionary social programs, like even a smart way to Medicaid, not to the entitlements.
But unless you do that, the math doesn't work out.
Look, the first half of the year, we've already had a $1.3 trillion deficit.
I think this year for the full year is going to be $2.5 trillion.
The current system we have is not sustainable.
It's just not.
We're kidding ourselves.
You have to go to an alternative.
I think the alternative is budget cuts, and I think you incentivize the wealthy here to get their lobbyists to start getting focused on budget cuts, and it has to be tax increases on the wealthy.
I think we can get muster 25 or 30 people in the House, and I think a bunch of people in the Senate.
Behind closed doors, they're all saying it's logical.
Plus, if you see what's happening this week, if you take what we're doing to break up the oligarchs with the FTC suit against Facebook and what we're doing with the Justice Department on Google, if you add President Trump's tariffs and economic nationalism of bringing the jobs back, you add the tax cuts, that is populism nationalism.
This is why our coalition grows every day.
This is so hollow of what Bernie Sanders and AOC talk about.
They run around on this break the oligarchs up.
The Democratic Party created the oligarchy because all of those oligarchs were all progressive Democrats until 11 o'clock, 11 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on the 5th of November.
So they created it.
President Trump's coming up with a solution.
If you add everything that's happening, you see what populism nationalism stands for.
You mentioned Newt Gingrich, who I think posted this slightly confusing thing that he had had some correspondence with Trump where he told Trump that if he raised taxes, it would be Bush 92.
And Trump said, you're right, Newt, I'm never going to do that.
Yeah, and we had Ferguson here earlier to talking about that.
So I guess on the other side of the ledger, in a way, on the cuts side, on the Tesla earnings call yesterday, Elon Musk said he's going to start to step away from his government work.
I do support Doge because you've got to deconstruct the administrative state.
If you want to get to deregulation, you have to deconstruct this choking administrative state that the Constitution, the founders, never thought of.
I think with Elon, what I do think we have to do, and we have to be very specific, before he leaves to go back to Tesla, he's going to hang around part-time.
We need to have an accounting.
He's questioned the integrity of the system, okay?
Like Treasury is 6.5 trillion dollars.
They can't find all this social security Irs.
We need to have a very specific accounting of what he found as far as fraud goes and and waste, and I mean details Treasury's got to sign off that Omb's got to sign off and every department head.
We need to know exactly what he found, because he went from two trillion a year to one trillion a year to 150 billion dollars next year, with nothing this year.
None of this makes sense.
The cuts you've seen that have been announced are programmatic, whether it's USAID or DOE, that's a totally different thing.
So I think you have to do that.
And also, I think we have to have a letter of certification that not one data set or piece of data of the United States government or citizens of this country are held by anybody or any copies held except for the Trump administration and the U.S. government.
And that has to happen, I think, in the month of May.
Well, the Chinese briefing, the war plan, but not related to Doe.
Look, what they're trying to do is important for all of us.
We want to make sure we get the fraud out.
We want to make sure we get the abuse out.
We want to make sure the waste, but that's treat it like some magic wand.
It gets the hill off the hook.
The country, we don't have any easy choices anymore.
Remember when they talked about OMB where the money was and the meltdown?
Our choices narrow every day.
And here's why.
The global bond market gets a vote.
The bond market turfed out the trust government in the United Kingdom, right, by doing a Reagan-type tax cut and not giving the numbers of what it really meant.
We're not going to have those options anymore.
Not at $37 trillion when you're adding a trillion every 100 days and Scott Besson has to refinance, I don't know, $10 trillion of it.
You guys would know better.
We are narrowing our choices and our alternatives.
I don't care if it's Bernie Sanders and AOC or Donald Trump.
As a country, we have to come to a solution to this.
And what the Harvard and the colleges and the law firms show you, it's all federal money.
The reason Paul Weiss created was because of the federal money.
You're going to lose your security clearance.
You're not going to be able to work with Frederick Jobs.
One other person I want to ask you about is Scott Besant, who you, you know, who I first, as a sometime war, Steve Bennon's war room listener, that's where I first discovered Besant.
And you've known him for a while.
You were a big supporter of his coming to the administration.
And I think he's emerged as the guy in the administration who, I know you don't care about the markets, but when he goes on TV, sometimes they don't go down.
Well, I care about the bond market a lot.
And I wonder.
He reportedly just today reportedly had a huge, maybe physical blowout with Elon Musk in the West Wing.
There is currently, you know, there was some story that they're tricking Navarro to go across the street so Beset and Luttner can run to the West Wing.
Well, not running the economy, but he's a safe pair of hands.
President Trump's a very sophisticated businessman, but Scott is a safe pair of hands that understands capital markets deeply.
He's done this for 30 years.
He has a very strong sense of what markets need to hear as far as information go.
Okay?
Remember, the first fight, besides the H-1B visas and transhumanism, the first big fight we've had with Elon was over Elon pushed Howard Luttnick and Bannon in War Room pushed Scott Besson, and that got very nasty in Mar-a-Lago.
They leaked all kinds of stuff about Scott that was not true.
And at the time, I said, for what President Trump's trying to do on trade, on tariffs, on taxes, on national security, you're going to need a steady eddy Iraq that the markets can sit there and go, that guy's telling me the truth.
I may not like it, but he's telling me the truth.
That's Scott Besson.
And I'll be blunt.
If Howard Luttnick had been Secretary of the Treasury, it would have been an unmitigated disaster.
Okay?
Unmitigated disaster.
And this is about people putting their own interests first, like Elon, versus putting the nation's interests first.
Thursday, watch the final segment in our encore presentation of our 10-part American History TV series, First 100 Days.
We've been exploring the early months of presidential administrations with historians and authors and through the C-SPAN archives.
And we learned about the decisions made and how they shaped the White House, the nation, and history.
First 100 Days00:02:07
unidentified
Thursday will feature the first 100 days of Donald Trump's first term.
As a businessman, he won elective office for the first time in 2016 by defeating Democrat Hillary Clinton.
President Trump pushed for construction of a wall at the southern border, a travel ban against people from certain countries, repeal of the Affordable Care Act, and tax cut plan.
He also nominated Neil Gorsuch for Supreme Court, the first of three justices confirmed to the high court during his presidency.