The unavoidable question of the week: why is Jillian Michaels on CNN commenting on slavery, exactly?
As it turns out, Netflix provides the answer. The three-part docuseries, Fit for TV: The Reality of the Biggest Loser, creeps behind the scenes of this uber-popular and uber-disturbing reality show that weirdly promoted fat-shaming while simultaneously pretending to alleviate it.
As we’ll discuss today, we can’t shake the feeling that the biggest loser from this entire mess is all of us.
Show Notes
As Republicans spar over IVF, some turn to obscure MAHA-backed alternative
RFK Jr. Is Getting Personal Authority Over Who to Kick Off Medicaid
Trump and RFK Jr. to Ban COVID-19 Vaccine ‘Within Months’
Scientists Strip ‘Diversity’ Language From Research to Keep Federal Grants
After ‘The Biggest Loser,’ Their Bodies Fought to Regain Weight
ACOG on "Restorative Reproductive medicine”
Arkansas’ RESTORE Act
MAHA-backed IVF-alternative
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Do you want to know what it's like to hang out with MS-13 in El Salvador?
How the Russian mafia fought battles all over Brooklyn in the 1990s?
Or what about that time I got lost in the Burmese jungle hunting the world's biggest meth lab?
Or why the Japanese yakuza have all those crazy dragon tattoos?
I'm Sean Williams.
And I'm Danny Gould.
And we're the host of the Underworld Podcast.
We're journalists that have traveled all over reporting on dangerous people and places.
And every week, we'll be bringing you a new story about organized crime from all over the world.
We know this stuff because we've been there.
We've seen it and we've got the near misses and embarrassing tales to go with it.
We'll mix in reporting with our own experiences in the field and we'll throw in some bad jokes while we're at it.
The Underworld podcast explores the criminal underworlds that affect all of our lives, whether we know it or not.
Available wherever you get your podcasts.
Overwhelmed by investing?
If you're anything like us, the hardest part is getting started.
That's why we created the Investing for Beginners podcast.
Our goal is to help simplify money so it can work for you.
We invite guests to demystify investing.
At least try to be setting aside like the minimum ten percent into the 401k.
We'll teach you the basics of the market.
Yeah, I think compound interest should be at the start of any discussion about investing.
We've had investment professionals who teach in a simple way.
A valuation-driven bear market.
We haven't really seen yet, and I think everyone's thinking about it, but we haven't really seen yet.
Our Q ⁇ A episodes feature questions from listeners just like you.
So what do you think about the situation with ETBI, which is Activision?
I'm Dave Ahern.
And I'm Andrew Sather.
And we hope you join us on the Investing for Beginners podcast.
on the Investing for Beginners podcast.
Investing for Beginners Hey everyone, welcome to Conspirituality where we investigate the intersections of conspiracy theories and spiritual influence to uncover cults, pseudoscience, and authoritarian extremism.
I'm Derek Barris.
I'm Julian Walker.
Matthew is away this week on a family vacation.
but he has pre-recorded the brief and bonus for this weekend so you can hear him then and we'll all be together next week.
For now, we are all on Instagram and threads at Conspirituality Pod, as well as individually on Blue Sky.
You can access all of our episodes ad-free, plus our Monday bonus episodes on Patreon at patreon.com slash conspirituality.
You can also access our Monday bonus episodes via Apple subscriptions.
As independent media creators, we really appreciate your support.
Conspirituality 272, Gillian Michaels is the biggest loser.
The unavoidable question of the week, why is Gillian Michaels on CNN commenting on slavery exactly?
As it turns out, Netflix provides the answer.
The three-part talk-sky series Fit for TV, the reality of the biggest loser, creeps behind the scenes of this uber popular and uber disturbing 18-season reality show that weirdly promoted fat shaming while simultaneously pretending to alleviate it.
It turns out that sort of jujitsu falls apart when hearing directly from the producers, contestants, and one of the two celebrity trainers, Bob Harper.
Jillian declined to participate, which has now resulted in threats of a lawsuit.
And as we'll discuss today, we can't shake the feeling that the biggest loser from this entire mess is all of us.
This week in spirituality.
Well, Jillian, another week has gone by, which means another year's worth of destruction over in Maha land.
RFK Jr. now has near total personal authority in deciding who is considered medically frail.
and who has special medical needs as Mother Jones reports.
Why does this matter?
Well, if you're on Medicaid, it matters a lot.
Kennedy, who as a reminder, has no medical training whatsoever, is now being given the power to decide who gets kicked off of that program.
Here's how Mother Jones describes it.
A person with debilitating chronic pain or a serious autoimmune illness may appear able-bodied by the standards RFK Jr. appears poised to implement, even as they face hurdles in qualifying for Social Security disability due to not being considered disabled enough.
Yeah, fuck these guys.
First of all, able-bodied.
If you'd followed the Maha challenge, watching them try to do push-ups and pull-ups, they're not very able-bodied themselves.
And I'm not being facetious.
I mean, if you're going to go online to millions of people and be like, this is our fitness program.
And then just fuck off with the actual program.
I have no love for you.
So besides that, in terms of this particular piece with Medicaid, one public health official speculates that this could play out just like Trump's move of sending National Guard troops to major cities, target vulnerable people in blue states while accepting the same conditions for those in need in red states.
Obviously, this is stupid for a number of reasons, including the fact that no state is either all blue or all red.
So indiscriminately kicking people off Medicaid and blue states in no way guarantees that they're Democrats.
But cruelty does not discriminate in this sense.
Number two, meanwhile, the Delhi Beast reports this week that COVID vaccines could be a thing of the past in America.
Super anti-vaxer and COVID contrarian Asim Mahultra told the publication that many of those closest to RFK Jr. have told him they cannot understand why the vaccine continues to be prescribed and that a decision to remove the vaccine from the U.S. market pending further research will come within months, even if it is likely to cause fear of chaos and bring with it major legal ramifications.
Mahultra, we've covered him a little bit but never really focused on him.
He's kind of a proto Kennedy.
He's been relating diet to chronic diseases since at least 2014.
And I don't mean in the e-better for better health kind of way.
Early into the pandemic, he published a book called The 21 Day Immunity Plan in which he claimed that diet could help people reduce their risk of getting or dying from the virus.
He's basically rewritten diet books for years and adapted them to whatever cultural situation suited the moment.
For example, he published a 21-day low carb diet book in 2017 as well, jumping on the keto trend.
Now, strangely, he initially campaigned for the COVID vaccine before coming out hard against mRNA vaccines broadly.
We've seen that actually a number of times.
Now he's a leading advisor to the lobbying group, Make America Healthy Again Action.
And he's also a close friend of Kennedy.
So I'm going to take him at his word that HHS will at least try to make this happen.
Number three, last one from me.
And then I know you got one.
Wall Street Journal reports that scientists are removing words like diverse and disparities from their federal research grants.
Jesus Christ.
You know, I write this script and then even as I'm reading it, I'm like, I can't believe this is fucking real.
So they're removing these words from grants in order to keep the money that HHS has initially promised.
Wall Street Journal talked to Tim Nurkowitz, a physiology, pharmacology, and toxicology professor at West Virginia University, who told the paper that an NIH official told him to remove the word diverse from his grants.
Here's the context.
Nurkowitz was baffled.
His work in Appalachia studying how particles get into the lungs and affect health has nothing to do with DEI.
The first sentence of his grant summary included the word diverse, but that pertained to diverse airborne toxicants.
He said the bad word.
Berkowitz finally got his renewed funding after he changed the phrase to a large variety of airborne toxicants.
I'm working on a new book.
I'm like 25,000 words in.
It's really flying, but I realized it's sort of half the work I do on the podcast, half memoir, and I'm talking about this stretch in college and I'm writing about diversity and the importance of diversity.
And there's a moment where I have to stop and actually in the text say, I didn't think when I was going to college in the 90s, when we were talking about issues of diversity, that 30 years later, I would need to reiterate it because I thought the culture was just going to assume that by that point.
And the fact that we are actually further back than we were 30 years ago in this regard in our understanding of the importance of diversity just kind of baffles my mind and is giving a framework for that work right now.
It is super frustrating.
We are recording this on Wednesday, the day before this runs, but I even have a feeling, given that I track Kennedy every day on Twitter, that by the time you're listening to this, there's going to be another half dozen stories that could fit into this segment.
And I think, Julian, you have at least one more.
Yeah, so let's just stay on the Maha related tip, given that there's a constant deluge of this shit.
With the decades-long project of overturning Roe versus Wade firmly in the rearview, the anti-abortion movement now has its sights set on IVF.
Because some embryos are inevitably discarded in the process of creating a viable pregnancy, activists see the medical science assisting conception as a form of abortion.
One problem for these activists, however, is that Donald Trump campaigned on a promise to protect IVF.
Wait, that's not really a problem at all.
He even said he'd make sure it was covered by health insurance.
And not only has he not followed through on that promise at all, this past April, his administration dissolved a CDC panel that tracked IVF outcomes around the country.
And this allowed potential patients in the past to evaluate the success rates of different fertility clinics.
Now, opinions within GOP-led legislatures are divided and this is illustrated by some state houses passing protections for IVF sort of as promised even as anti-choice bills try to encroach upon it last year the Alabama Supreme Court led the latter charge ruling that IVF embryos have the status and rights of being people and then representatives in the Arkansas House have also floated bills which would charge IVF clinics with homicide as
well as trying to create a special license for clinics that offer the service and then requiring the number of fertilized embryos and their outcomes to be reported to their state's Department of Health.
But the thing is, they're already doing that kind of reporting to the CDC.
Here's where the story starts to have recognizable conspirituality contours.
Some anti-abortion conservatives, along with the Heritage Foundation, who would have thought, are using Maha-type language to promote a natural and holistic fertility treatment method referred to as restorative reproductive medicine.
As listeners might guess, the website for the International Institute of Restorative Reproductive Medicine tells us that this approach seeks to identify the underlying health conditions that contribute to reproductive dysfunction and suboptimal reproductive health, close quotes.
They provide personalized treatment plans with methods that include what seems like a lot of tests, medications, supplements, surgeries, and lifestyle adjustments.
Yeah, it sounds like bespoke so-called functional medicine for the reproductive system.
When qualified fertility experts point out that these methods are not supported by medical science, proponents of RRM say they are being suppressive.
I'm sure Mark Hyman and his function health is going to get a contract for this.
I've called it for this fall when the private partner, public partnerships begin and I'm pretty sure function.
They've actually just recently bought an MR, a full body MRI company.
Experts have said that most people don't need full body MRIs.
It's just pretty much garbage and a waste of money, but they bought that and I'm guessing it's going to line up with things like this for these types of partnerships.
I found some nice reporting on this topic from Kentucky Lantern.
They write, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists call RRM a non-medical approach and an unproven concept that can delay time to pregnancy and expose patients to needless and painful surgical interventions such as procedures to treat polycystic ovarian syndrome.
It says the approach overwhelmingly puts the onus on women, ignoring the infertility that infertility causes are just as common in men, which is completely true.
They also point out that clinics have ties to private equity firms and other large corporations, which when you brought up Heritage Foundation, that puts it into context because they very much are about the privatization of as much health care as possible as they laid out Project 2025.
Yeah.
And as you pointed out, the word surgeries is on that list of holistic treatments.
And this often refers also to surgical excision of endometriosis tissue, which is erroneously proposed as being the main barrier to pregnancy.
So you're not going to need all of that like, you know, satanic IVF stuff.
We'll just go in there and cut things out and then you'll be able to magically get pregnant.
What if they do psychic surgeries?
Yeah, exactly.
That would be probably as effective in some cases.
These procedures may be unnecessary.
They may expose the patient to the standard risks associated with surgery and have little or no impact on fertility according to the American College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians.
Meanwhile, the state of Arkansas has actually passed a bill called the Restore Act, which requires that insurance companies, and this is part of what you were referencing a moment ago, Derek, in terms of people starting to wet their beaks.
Insurance companies have to cover these treatments.
Proponents refer to it as ethical.
IVF.
The Guardian also reports that last month, RFK Jr.'s Department of HHS posted a notice soliciting applications for a proposed $1.5 million grant to fund an infertility training center that would expand access to resources for holistic infertility treatments rather than assisted reproductive technology.
You know, there's already a term for ethical IVF.
It's called IVF.
IVF, yeah, exactly.
It's right.
It's a tautology.
To nail this whole crunchy meats conservative horseshoe that, you know, we endlessly describe firmly to the hoof, The National Catholic Bioethics Center's website claims that RRM seeks to get to the root cause of infertility.
Jesus Christ.
Root cause has made it into Catholic discourse.
Of course.
If you're obsessed with true crime, cults, or conspiracy theories, I've got the perfect show for you.
Conspiracy Theories, Cults, and Crimes is a new weekly podcast from Crimehouse and Pave Studios that dives into the darkest corners of human behavior.
Every Wednesday, we uncover the true stories behind the world's most shocking crimes, deadly ideologies, and secret plots.
From mass suicides and political assassinations to secret government experiments and UFO cults, you'll hear about infamous cases like Jonestown and JFK, as well as hidden horrors like the Octopus Murders and Starvation Heights.
But remember, these aren't just stories.
These are real people, real events, and very real consequences.
So if you love mystery, madness, and diving deep into the world's most unbelievable true stories, you won't want to miss this.
Follow Conspiracy Theories, Cults, and Crimes now, wherever you get your podcasts.
And for ad-free listening and early access to episodes, subscribe to Crimehouse Plus on Apple Podcasts.
Comedy fans, listen up.
I've got an incredible podcast for you to add to your queue.
Nobody listens to Paula Poundstone.
You probably know that I made an appearance recently on this absolutely ludicrous variety show that combines the fun of a late-night show with the wit of a public radio program and the unique knowledge of a guest expert, who was me at the time, if you can believe that.
Brace yourself for a rollercoaster ride of wildly diverse topics, from Paula's hilarious attempts to understand QAnon to riveting conversations with a bonafide rocket scientist.
You'll never know what to expect, but you'll know you're in for a high-spirited, hilarious time.
So this is comedian Paula Poundstone and her co-host Adam Thelber, who was great.
They're both regular panelists on NPR's classic comedy show.
You may recognize them from that.
Wait, wait, don't tell me.
And they bring the same acerbic yet infectiously funny energy to Nobody Listens to Paula Poundstone.
When I was on, they grilled me in an absolutely unique way.
about conspiracy theories and yoga and yoga pants and QAnon and we had a great time.
They were very sincerely interested in the topic but they still found plenty of hilarious angles in terms of the questions they asked and how they followed up on whatever I gave them like good comedians do.
Check out their show.
There are other recent episodes you might find interesting as well like hearing crazy Hollywood stories from legendary casting director Joel Thurm or their episode about killer whales and killer theme songs.
So Nobody Listens to Paula Poundstone is an absolute riot you don't want to miss.
Find Nobody Listens to Paula Poundstone on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to your podcasts.
Have you ever wondered why we call french fries french fries?
Or why something is the greatest thing since sliced bread?
There are answers to those questions.
Everything Everywhere Daily is a podcast for curious people who want to learn more about the world around them.
Every day you'll learn something new about things you never knew you didn't know.
Subjects include history, science, geography, mathematics, and culture.
If you're a curious person and want to learn more about the world you live in, just subscribe to Everything Everywhere Daily wherever you cast your pod.
I was watching CNN and I saw where Jillian Michaels was on there in a debate that she seemed to have started.
They were talking about changes to the Smithsonian and how art and culture shifts between who has the power to dictate how the exhibits are written, who the exhibits are of, and everything.
And Jillian Michaels was like, it's so unfair that slavery in this country only gets blamed on one race.
Look, look, as outrageous as that is, that is genuinely funny.
Like, look, look, I'm not going to tell anybody how to feel, but if you..
heard the words i said that jillian said and you immediately got angry i would ask you to take a step back i'm not going to tell you how to feel you can be angry if you want to be angry because it is a very short-sighted ignorant thing to say but that's precisely why it's so funny it is absolutely hilarious.
All right.
Well, last week we played the CNN clip in question on the podcast, but I wanted to start off this discussion with a bit of a laugh that comes to you via the Daily Show correspondent and new host now, Josh Johnson.
Plus, there's a straight line from Jillian Michael's role as one of the two coaches on The Biggest Loser to her now prominent role in Maha, where, for example, RFK Jr. invited her to speak in front of Congress last fall.
She also regularly hosts Maha influencers on her podcast.
And I think the safest assumption that line drags across is she's completely unqualified for any position she's been in in her career.
But willing to speak very loudly and aggressively on whatever topic is in front of her.
Oh, absolutely.
I'll get into this when we do synopsis, but her as a coach is a fucking joke.
So we'll be clear on that.
The Biggest Loser is back in the cultural discourse, thanks to the Netflix docuseries Fit for TV, which surveys a few select seasons from the show.
It's not exhaustive by any means.
Michaels was one of two trainers for the first 11 seasons.
She returned for seasons 14 and 15.
Her counterpart, Bob Harper, was a trainer on All 18.
He also did three films.
for the australian version of the show notably michaels did not appear in the netflix series while harper did which made for a lot of the blame placed on Michaels for offering contestants caffeine pills and for which she's now considering suing Netflix for.
We'll get there.
It's a little more complex than that.
But the fallout from the series, I think, is as interesting as the series itself.
Before we get into that, Julian, what did you think about Fit for TV?
I mean, I feel like like a lot of people in our demographic probably, I really missed out on the explosion of reality TV in general when it was happening.
So it's been a little bit of an anthropological expedition for me to learn about this show.
I'm stunned that it was hugely popular for 17 or 18 seasons.
I'll say more about why a little bit later.
Fit for TV, the documentary, is fascinating because it examines the cultural phenomenon of this hugely successful Biggest Loser series in which very heavy people, the average starting weight being about 328 pounds, competed to see who could lose the most weight week by week over a 30-week period.
And to do so, they utilized this combination of intense exercise, caloric restriction, dehydration, as it turns out, and other more controversial methods.
Overall, I feel like this documentary depicts a sickening blend of desperate enthusiasm, relentless shaming and that weird live audience reality TV kind of circus vibe.
And Jillian Michaels, who we've been talking about lately in our Instagram quite a bit as well, rose to fame as a trainer on The Biggest Loser, which made me kind of feel like I was just watching another season of Jillian Michaels is an awful human being, especially given how much she's been in the news lately as you flagged.
For anyone who had any doubt, going back and watching her on The Biggest Loser confirms she is someone with a rare level of unapologetic sadism.
And that's not a common trait.
The Netflix doc does something the actual show, as it turns out, failed to do, which is follow up with former contestants and check in on their physical and mental health.
So more on that to come.
Kara Swisher, the podcast host and journalist, was on Jillian Michaels'podcast, and she actually posted yesterday about it, saying her reasons for being on it, but also saying that being...
During this entire time, I never watched The Biggest Loser.
I watched season one of Real House on MTV in what, like 93?
Something like that.
That was the beginning of what we now know as Rala TV.
The real world, you mean.
Real world, thank you.
It was in the house.
It was in the house.
I actually auditioned for that show.
I was like 21 years old.
Yeah.
I got to the second stage.
Wow.
I'm sorry you didn't make it further.
I'm really glad I didn't.
But that was my whole interaction.
then I went to college and then reality TV just became a joke to me, but I i do remember when the series was running during the entire time it ran i was a fitness instructor at equinox so i was parallel to it and i want to be clear on one thing that I think is really important that I've learned for decades of teaching different modalities in fitness.
Different people take to different instructors and different kinds of instruction.
I was never one to yell at people.
I was not a screamer.
I tried to amp people up in kettlebell classes or cycling, but to actually degrade people was something that I and all of my colleagues that I knew at Equinox, that was not what we did.
I do think there is a population that feeds off of that, and that is what the biggest loser thrived from and sort of why it was a spectacle.
Famously, the boot camp scene, sometimes CrossFit had that ethos and mentality of like no pain, no gain.
I don't like it.
I understand for some it has utility.
I just want to be really clear on that because I'm super critical of what the biggest loser did is what we're going to get into.
But I do find one thing that really came out watching this series.
was how cult-like both Jillian and Bob were in their approach of breaking people down and then trying to build them back up.
Like that kept coming across.
And you can argue that it's the editing and the way it was positioned, which is very shady and very meant to invoke emotions in the watchers, the viewers, not the contestants.
but that came across over and over again how they would just shit on people and then pretend like they were there to actually help them and big picture i don't think that's helpful for anyone the series as i said it only looks at a couple of seasons and only a couple of contestants I think they did a pretty good job at giving a broad overview,
but obviously with 18 seasons, they missed a lot, including in the few seasons they discussed that includes a big focus on the series which is the seventh season which was in 2009 they did two seasons a year so it didn't last for 17 or 18 years this was the second time they featured couples on the show there was a woman named joelle gwen who was heavily featured in fit for tv uh she had a falling out with her friend carla trippett so
i went back and i watched the first episode of that season and then tagged and then watched a few other episodes in preparation for this podcast it turns out that the fallout happened in the first week of the season.
I mean, this fall takes almost an entire episode of the three episodes, but it was only in week one of that season.
It couldn't have happened later because of a plot twist that the producers introduced into the series.
And I'm including it here because it highlights the sort of cruelty the show is infamous for.
And they really don't discuss this in the documentary series.
Think about this.
You're overweight.
and you want to get on the biggest loser to help you lose weight and to get healthy and to feel better about yourself.
You submit a tape with your friend or your relative and you get accepted.
The very beginning of the first episode, it features the contestants finding out they were.
were chosen.
It was sheer excitement and joy.
Then a week into filming, you take part in a race with your partner as part of the series.
As it turns out, the winner receives immunity at the first weigh-in.
So the way that the show is structured, if you lose the least amount of weight in a week, you get kicked off the island.
So winning this race is huge.
It means you could have lost the least amount of weight, but you wouldn't get kicked off.
Then you get to the weigh-in and this is what happens.
Tonight there will be no eliminations.
What?
That is awesome.
Oh my god.
Oh my god.
I do it.
I do it.
She's not done.
What's the catch?
Tonight there will be no elimination.
nine of you are going home.
Here's how it's going to work.
Each team will weigh in, and it will be the team with the highest combined percentage of weight loss who will be above the yellow line.
Dane and Blaine, you won immunity this week, so you are the only couple that is safe here on campus tonight.
The only other couple that will be safe tonight is the couple that wins the weigh-in.
The nine teams who fall below the yellow line will have to choose one person from each couple to go home.
When Allison announced the twist, I was devastated.
I was just like, are you kidding me?
We've only been here for a week.
Yeah.
So just fucking cruel.
Like, and that was what they introduced for that series.
And I'm kind of surprised the documentary doesn't go into that, but that's the mentality.
I think that's a good heuristic for understanding the mentality of the people behind this entire expedition.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And honestly, as someone who did not grow up in this country, like this, this is, this could be just a microcosm of everything that people outside of America find so distasteful about so much of America.
of American entertainment and spectacle.
I feel like this kind of reality TV is the incestuous love child of the most based level social conditioning and primal emotions as stimulated by that over-the-top music.
And then that game that kids often play where, you know, you ask each other things like, if one of your parents had to die, would you pick your mom or your dad?
Or would you rather have a dog bite off three of your fingers or have your grandma go blind?
You know, it's like, what are we even doing here?
It creates car crash scenarios that you struggle to look away from, but the cultural collateral damage is really not worth it.
And my stomach tightens as I cringe for the hopeful, ordinary people thrust into the limelight to mostly just be sacrificed on the altar of crappy entertainment, right?
Now, regarding fitness and weight loss, of course, it's such loaded territory.
Everyone is better off if they maintain healthy levels of weight and activity.
And yeah, it's true.
People treat us differently when we fit certain ideals better than when we are obese.
It can feel empowering and even improve mental health to regain a sense of control over these areas of our lives.
But there are certain statistics that always stay with me that we've talked about before, Derek, like the facts that having a first degree relative with type 2 diabetes increases the prevalence by two to three times in the when compared to the rest of the population and that goes up to a 70 likelihood of developing the condition if both parents have it current research also puts genetic factors at between 40 and 70 responsible for
obesity too i know we're going to inevitably talk about rvk jr and maha some more but as a little preview here you know kenedy loves to claim that 70 of americans are obese and sometimes he corrects himself and says that 70 of americans are overweight which actually makes a big difference because the 40 of americans that are actually obese are included in that larger number with the rest being merely overweight.
When we look up these percentages for other anglophile countries in the developed world like the UK, Australia, Canada, they're all at around 65% overweight.
So it does seem to be a problem of wealthier societies.
I would argue we might make up that, I would speculate here, we might make up that additional 5% that the US has over those other countries due to greater income inequality and food deserts.
But then let's also just step back and remember that all of this is based on BMI, which is an extremely flawed heuristic that was never designed to be used at a population level.
And that BMI rating also incorrectly skews many very healthy people with athletic muscle mass into overweight or even obese categories, no matter how fit or how lean they might be.
This is an alarming factoid that Kennedy likes to use that plays into the conspiracy pseudoscience strategy of catastrophizing about a problem, speculating without evidence about its cause, and then claiming, hey, we've got the magical solution right here.
You know, it's going to be like tallow on your French fries and real sugar and coca-cola and it's going to solve the obesity and diabetes epidemic right fat people get hugely stigmatized by all of this for reasons that are totally unfair and discriminatory as if all of us would look like them unless we had such high levels of like moral and dietary fiber.
BMI is so frustrating.
I mean, I'm 6'3.
For so much of my life, I maintained a body weight of about 185.
And I remember friends and my wife would be like, you're not eating enough because of the workouts that I do.
And then finally, one thing about COVID is that I actually started to be like, let me actually eat more, also start a creatine, but let me see if I can actually put on mass.
And I'm up to 210.
Yeah.
And I'm healthier than I've ever been.
I'm stronger than I've ever been at 50.
All of my blood markers that I get at the doctor, I'm in the top 1 or 2 percent for my age group.
But officially, according to the BMI calculator, I'm considered overweight.
Yep.
Yep.
Me too.
Me too.
And you haven't done that just with that.
You've been doing a lot of heavy lifting.
So you have packed on a certain amount of muscle through that deliberate process.
Exactly.
That's why I decided to put on weight because I was lifting above what my frame could handle.
And I was getting some back issues.
And I said, okay, let me actually address this.
And I did.
and I feel much better now than I did five years ago when I started, even though officially I'm overweight according to what Maha references as being someone that needs to lose weight.
Totally.
Speaking of Maha, this entire series got me thinking about them.
You can't avoid it because the way that Bob and Jillian treat fat people sounds exactly like how Kennedy and his crew berate them.
So it makes sense that Jillian has become a big part of Maha.
Specifically, I kept thinking about Kennedy saying every American should get a free gym membership about a year ago.
On its face, if you were to just say, hey, everyone should have access to a gym for free, I'm actually down for it.
And there are actually opportunities like this.
I got into this with people on threads who are making the similar argument.
New York City, where I live for a dozen years, they have city gyms all over the boroughs.
They cost $150 a year.
If you're 25 or under, you go for free.
If you're 65 or older, they cost $25 a year.
Here in Portland, where I now live, you can go to any rec city in the city for $30 a month.
But there's a catch.
If you're low income, you can get discounts up to free.
And it's an honors program.
You don't even have to prove your income.
I'm going to guess a lot of cities have similar programs.
Yet only 20.6% of Americans have a gym membership.
On top of that, many gyms survive because people pay but don't go.
Oh, yeah.
I've read stats between 50 and 90 percent of members don't go to their gym once in a month, even though they're paying.
The cheaper the gym, the more people don't go.
So Planet Fitness has about a 10% rate of people going every month because it costs $10 a month.
Now, where I worked at Equinox, which costs $225, $250 a month per.
gym, the retention rate was 50%.
That means half the people paying that money didn't actually go in a month.
Yeah.
And most of those people who are not going are people who signed up as a New Year's resolution and paid for the whole year, right?
That's the model.
Yeah.
You can't do that at Equinox, but with other gyms, that is correct.
Okay.
The story is way more complicated than get a gym membership.
What Kennedy and many other Fitfluencers miss is the fact that people don't fucking like gyms.
And for a number of reasons.
One is that fat people are relentlessly judged in them.
Now, obviously, this depends not only on the gym, but the time of the day you're able to go.
Here in Portland, I go to LA Fitness.
I'm there by 6 a.m. every morning.
And the before the work, before work crew is get in, get out.
It's blissfully quiet and calm as people do their thing.
But I've also gone later in the day sometimes.
And it's a fucking zoo.
I get why people would hate that environment.
I'm someone who grew up in these spaces, basement gym.
My father built one when I was growing up.
He also, on a volunteer basis, ran his company gym.
And so I was going there all the time.
So for me, I swim in those waters.
A lot of people don't.
So to say, hey, you're overweight, get in this gym and expect people would just take to it is absurd.
You know, also along the lines of this topic, it came out recently that Serena Williams lost 31 pounds by using GLP-1 medication.
said that she struggled with her weight after the birth of her second child she's been posting workout photos mentioning how great she feels so there were a lot of rumors about how she lost the weight now right on cue I saw a ton of comments about how she's cheating.
You have here one of the top tennis players ever to play the game who was criticized then for being larger.
And now that she's lost some weight, she's being criticized for how she lost it.
Can't win.
Exactly.
There's obviously some gender dynamics here.
In general, women are shit on way more for using Ozempic than men because assholes are always quicker to criticize women about anything.
But it's just the hypocrisy of people in this space, including Kennedy and Maha, most of whom hate GLP-1 interventions.
As one commenter I saw wrote on one of the threads about Serena, just say you hate fat people.
The most outspoken critics of Ozempic at all that I've seen are fitness influencers and trainers because they stand to lose income from coaching and supplement sales.
Their stated reason always falls back on the personal responsibility trope.
You just don't have the willpower, Fatty, which is why Maha just feels like the latest season of the biggest loser.
Oh, yeah.
Kennedy's recent challenge alongside Pete Hagseth of doing 50 pull-ups and 100 push-ups is so fitting for this moment, even though they can't do it themselves.
It's all spectacle.
Oh, and Cash Patel, I posted this.
Cash Patel tried it.
And that was a fucking nightmare as well.
It's like Kennedy dragging Dr. Oz up the side of that rock climbing things like, oh boy, these are our fearless leaders into like perfect health and fitness.
Do you know how hard pull-ups are for someone who doesn't know how to do it?
I know people who are very strong and fit and they can't do a pull-up.
It is a completely different exercise.
And same thing.
I mean, you know from yoga that chaturanga's low push-ups are not for everyone.
because people don't have the sort of training to do a proper push-up.
And then they go in yoga classes and they try to match the teacher doing a low push-up and they're shred their shoulders.
Their neck is in the wrong position.
Their traps are all scrunched up.
Like just put your knees down or just stay in plank.
There's so many other options, but we just have this go, go, go mentality in all of our workouts in America.
And you're going to hurt people, which is what this challenge is going to do to people who are like, yeah, I can do these things.
No, you can't.
And that's okay.
It's okay that you can't learn how to do one pull-up correctly with bands, however you need.
But don't go pretend you could do 50 and then you look like ass like Hegseth or Kennedy who are doing chin-ups.
First of all, they're not even doing pull-ups and they can't even do those correctly.
And I'm not one to hate on people's workouts in general.
My thought has always been, if you're exercising and having fun, go for it.
Zumba your heart out.
But the former fitness instructor and me, just watching their dumb video, it's just so hard given that you need full range of motion for push-ups and pull-ups.
Yeah.
And Derek, how many people?
can actually do even 50 chin-ups.
Like that's a lot.
Most people can't do 10 or five.
Like that's actually an extraordinary challenge to just think you're going to walk into and do right away as someone who's not, you know, actively engaged like that.
In 10 minutes, too.
And that's the other thing.
They're putting a time limit on it.
And then you're watching videos and it's.
a lot of people that they're resharing, like Riley Gaines, like Kennedy reshared her video being like, I could do it.
No, you can't.
You know, you're, first of all, you're 36 weeks pregnant.
And second of all, like your form is horrible, which you do, to her credit, say that.
But it's like, why are you sharing this shit?
People don't need that.
They need help.
They don't need that spectacle.
And the only reason I'm commenting is because they're presenting themselves as paragons of health and trying to, I don't know, inspire Americans to exercise.
Yet they don't even learn the exercises that they're challenging others to do, which is why Maha is as much a spectacle as the biggest loser.
It's not about helping people get healthy.
It's about showing off that you are.
Jillian already got the call to join Maha.
I'm guessing Bob Harper will get the call next.
So as we're going to discuss in the next segment, I'm pretty sure Jillian will box him out of that opportunity.
Yeah.
And this is yet another.
perhaps unsurprising, but nonetheless novel iteration of like how this influencer, contrarian kind of assumption of expertise plays out even in the physical domain.
It's like, oh yeah, of course I can do that.
I can do anything.
I have strong opinions about everything, even though I've never studied it and I'm not qualified.
And I could just like go and do a bunch of pull-ups and push-ups on camera because of course I can.
Feeling overwhelmed or stressed?
Take a deep breath and join me on the I Can Relax podcast.
Whether you're new to mindfulness or looking to deepen your practice, each episode is designed to help you slow down, calm your mind, and be fully present, even if you've never tried mindfulness before.
With simple guided exercises, soothing nature visualizations, and relaxing stories, I Can't Relax makes mindfulness easy and accessible for anyone who wants to reduce stress and find peace.
Subscribe to I Can't Relax wherever you get your podcasts and start your journey to a calmer mind today.
*Music*
Welcome to the I Can't Sleep podcast with Benjamin Boster.
If you're tired of sleepless nights, you'll love the I Can't Sleep podcast.
I help quiet your mind by reading random articles from across the web to bore you to sleep with my soothing voice.
Each episode provides enough interesting content to hold your attention and then your mind lets you drift off.
Find it wherever you get your podcasts.
That's I Can't Sleep with Benjamin Boster.
Music by Ben Thede.
Hey, do you have trouble sleeping?
Then maybe you should check out the Sleepy Podcast.
It's a show where I read old books in the public domain to help you get to sleep.
It was the best of times.
It was the worst of classic stories like A Tale of Two Cities, Pride and Prejudice, Winnie the Pooh.
Stories that are great for adults and kids alike.
For years now, Sleepy has helped millions of people catch some much-needed z's, start their next day off fresh, and discover old books that they didn't know they loved.
So, whether you have a tough time snoozing or you just like a good bedtime story, fluff up the cool side of your pillow and tune into Sleepy.
Unless you're driving, then...
Find Sleepy on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
New episodes each week.
Sweet dreams.
Sweet dreams.
One of the very prominent subplots here is that Gillian Michaels is one of the few cast members who declined to participate.
So unlike the other coach, the staff doctor, the producers, who all get to tell their side of the story along with several former contestants, Michaels instead just gets shown in all of her cruel drill sergeant intensity.
She gets in people's faces.
She insults them.
She berates them.
At one point, she throws a bucket of ice water over someone's head while they're like collapsed on the ground about to pass out.
Overall, she really just seems to have a real appetite for sadism.
The main controversy of the show involving Michaels is that the doctor, a guy named Robert Huisinger, has said that he forbade the use of caffeine pills based on safety reasons, but that Jillian went ahead and secretly gave them to the contestants on her team behind everyone's back.
And when this was discovered, they actually acknowledged it on the show.
in an episode, a very dramatic kind of moment, and gave her team a penalty because she broke the rules.
And then for her part, she's unrepentant during the broadcast and in later interviews saying that she stood by what she did because there was unlimited coffee available to everyone and so what's the difference in fact she thinks that caffeine pills are healthier than drinking tons of coffee science actually disagrees but when has that stopped anyone like her the new york times just did a feature on michael's and i love that they pull a quote from her when she was talking to rogan of being like who has the time to fact check all these
things You have a lot of time to run your mouth, though.
Some contestants alleged that other drugs like diuretics and even unnamed street drugs were allegedly used.
And Dr. Heusinger is suing the New York Post for publishing those allegations.
And so they retract the article.
Michaels has now spoken out.
And she said that she is considering suing Netflix and Bob Harper, the other trainer on the show, and the producers of the documentary.
And she's been sharing emails that show how on other seasons caffeine pills actually were allowed and were distributed by her and Harper and the doctors and the dieticians on the show.
But of course, she's still acknowledging, yeah, I went behind people's backs, even though I wasn't allowed to do this.
Fuck Julie Michaels in general and specifically to this episode.
But kudos to her for saving the receipts.
So what happens is they do show that moment that she admitted it on the show.
And then you have everyone else being like, we didn't know about all of this but then she comes out and she shares on instagram text messages and emails showing that everyone was in on it all the time on all the other seasons on all the other seasons but showing that it's a trend and that they were really pushing something called stackers to to try to get in on it so she's framed as the worst person here because she wasn't involved she had a follow-up bob harper
whatever and she is a terrible human but so is everyone on this show.
I have to give her credit for shoving it back into their face, but overall, I'd rather they all fucking burn for taking for partaking in this cruel project.
Yeah, yeah.
And I don't remember his name, but the main producer guy has so many moments where he's where it's just like.
You seem like you're lying right now.
He really tries to act like butter wouldn't melt in his mouth and I don't know anything about that.
And then big swallow and kind of eyes looking for different directions.
It's like, I don't know about this.
Michaels, for her part, is also taking the opportunity now to speak out against the woke body positivity movement, which is being critical of the show in hindsight, right?
And she says, this is actually a conspiratorial psyop by big food.
The only good news for her is that maybe it's distracting from her boneheaded slavery comments.
I don't know.
People can hold multiple thoughts in their head when it comes to this level of egregiousness.
The full quote of what you just referenced, I think, is even more telling.
Quote, I'm 51 years old, you know, I'm trying to take on bigger things.
I'm trying to help facilitate a change with big food and big pharma and big insurance.
And these are the 800 pound gorillas I want to jump in that ring with.
Her ego is just unmatched here.
I also just want to say the one shining moment of this entire podcast is Friend of the Pod, Arby Gordon, who does a fantastic job of contextualizing what has happened, what was happening during the show when it was happening, and then also how that reverberates throughout the culture.
So I do highly recommend the series, if not just to see her commentary on that.
Yeah, she's great on it.
Every moment she has is really strong.
Yes.
The biggest loser couldn't exist if our culture didn't buy into the idea that obesity is a personal failing.
While disdain for fat people predates the 80s, reganomics.
very specifically dictated that all health is personal as a way to avoid discussions of socialized medicine.
Still the same fucking thing happening right now.
And so you have another conspirituality crossover.
The right disdains giving away anything for free, while the left, specifically a portion of the wellness community and the fitfluencer community, loathes fatness.
There are overweight people who let things go.
I don't want to overlook that.
They have the means to eat better.
They can afford a gym.
They have the time to do all these things and they just don't.
I can't turn my eyes from that.
And if there weren't people like this, I don't think the biggest loser could even exist.
But personal responsibility is not the only reason people gain weight.
Let's just consider a few other reasons.
Genetic predisposition, which you mentioned earlier, medical conditions like hypothyroidism, polycystic ovary syndrome, Cushing syndrome, hypothalamic obesity.
Tons of medications promote weight gain, including steroids, antidepressants, antipsychotics, diabetes medications, beta blockers, Caesar medications, birth control pills.
Aging, muscle mass decreases naturally over time.
So aging will inevitably increase weight for a lot of people.
Poor sleep is a huge one.
Chronic stress is a huge one.
Economic status is a huge one.
Built environment, work and time pressures.
Big wellness does address a few of these, but usually by trying to sell you something.
Yeah.
Not sleeping, pay for this app to track you to sleep.
Buy this supplement.
Stress the fuck out.
We have a workout program for you.
And I'm not even hating on those things because exercise does wonders for stress, which could have downstream weight loss effects.
But if you're a Jillian Michaels style aspiring trainer, how are you going to sell a program that addresses the fact that your family is poor?
That's not Maha's target audience.
Kennedy loves to yell about how many people are over prescribed medications and is now using his power at HHS to launch an investigation into it.
But connecting them with weight gain is a step too far.
And he's certainly not going to address the social determinants of health while making videos about how he loves to visit local gyms while he's traveling on his fucking private plane.
Then there's another layer, one which the New York Times covered back in 2016.
Most contestants put.
the weight back on and for some higher than their original weight after the show.
And that has little to do with personal responsibility.
I pulled a few graphs from an article that was from that New York Times story.
And Julian, can you read them in full?
I think it really sets the context here.
It has to do with resting metabolism, which determines how many calories a person burns when at rest.
When the show began, the contestants, though hugely overweight, had normal metabolisms for their size, meaning they were burning a normal number of calories for people of their weight.
When it ended, their metabolisms had slowed radically and their bodies were not burning enough calories to maintain their thinner sizes.
Researchers knew that just about anyone who deliberately loses weight, even if they start at a normal weight or even underweight, will have a slower metabolism when the diet ends.
So they were not surprised to see that the biggest loser contestants had slow metabolisms when the show ended.
What shocked the researchers was what happened next.
As the years went by and the numbers on the scale climbed again, the contestants' metabolisms did not recover.
They became even slower and the pounds kept piling on.
It was as if their bodies were intensifying their effort to pull the contestants back to their original weight.
So fucking hypocritical.
You know, Casey and Callie means the, you know, the nominee for surgeon general and, uh, They don't mention this.
I read the book.
They don't talk about this phenomenon.
They want to sell you things.
They want to sell you levels, which is glucose monitoring uh programs and and hardware they want to sell you supplements they want to pretend that metabolic health is all within your grasp if you just do these things when actual researchers know that's not true yeah it's the it's the biohacking optimization version of medicare for all it's just insane this whole phenomenon throws a big old wrench into the ethos presented on the show and one that is endemic to maha eat
better move more and you're magically going to lose weight it's not that there's anything wrong again with those things with eating better perhaps eating less without with exercising more it's just not that everybody responds to those things in the same way, especially if you've been overweight.
Yeah.
And when you lose 200 or 300 pounds very, very rapidly and you put yourself through levels of activity that your body has not seen in your entire life in a very short period of time and you dehydrate yourself radically week after week.
Yeah, that's going to, your whole system is going to have a massive issue trying to integrate all of those intense, you know, polarizing back and forth dynamics that are going on.
And it's not like this hasn't been studied.
I've worked in this industry for decades and one of the things that was true 30 years ago that's still true today is that a healthy amount of weight loss is one, maybe two pounds a week.
If you're doing more than that, maybe initially some people will lose a little more, mostly because of water weight when they start working out.
But if you're maintaining something above that, there's probably a whole lot of downstream effects that aren't going to be good for you.
So having a little bit of understanding of how the process works is really important because it'll help you mentally just to have a realistic goal here, which could mean 50 pounds over the course of a year if you work at it, if that is your goal.
But if you're dropping 200 pounds in 12 weeks, man, that is not a good thing for your body.
Yeah, but how exciting is a TV show in which you're losing 102 pounds a week?
So I said before, I found it.
just stunning that the show was so popular and it's because my first impressions as most people are going to have watching fit for tv is that the premise is so cruel it creates spectacle out of people who are already socially devalued and seen as lacking in self-respect and discipline.
At the same time, it promised those contestants a way to redeem themselves by participating in a competitive ordeal with millions of people watching.
So obviously it was a pretty like extroverted kind of person who wanted attention, who ended up being on the show, as you saw from their audition videos.
And the redemption is not only about health, but it's about being more attractive or to put it more honestly, about being less disgusting.
And that's all while defeating those not able to get back on the treadmill after vomiting or almost passing out while Gillian Michael screamed sadistic abuse in their face.
There's something very Roman Colosseum about it all to me.
And the fact that so many applicants were clamoring to be on it really gives the lie to prejudices about fat people being lazy or weak.
They're desperate.
They're like, oh, okay, I'll try this while also underlining their conditioned familiarity with being humiliated.
Like they've developed a tolerance for being treated that shittily.
It's also outrageous that each season had this winner take all grand prize of $250,000 with all of the loser losers apparently being paid around 100 bucks a day to be there, even though some negotiated for slightly more than that.
It's still tiny in comparison.
Meanwhile, the stars of the show, the producers, and the network got very, very wealthy in the process.
Then there were all of the, this is the worst part for me, the weirdly exploitative temptation challenges, they called them, that involved choosing to either gorge yourself on as much high-calorie junk food as possible so as to then win prizes that might give you an advantage in the competition, or instead choosing to resist temptation and just stay on the straight narrow with your weight loss goals.
That was also a really gross spectacle.
Yeah, I had no idea about that because as I said, I didn't watch the show.
And what kind of broken brain thinks, hey, this is a good idea.
Yeah.
And then actually implements it.
It really does.
One thing the documentary does really well is pick out moments of where they are just humiliating the people intentionally, where they're carrying food around and their mouth running around.
And it's just, it's so dystopic.
Yeah.
Like pictured that production meeting.
Hey, I've got a great idea, guys.
Let's have all of these fat people who are desperately trying to lose hundreds of pounds be faced with this temptation where if they just absolutely stuff food into their faces, the most like high calorically dense junk food possible while we film them, they can have an advantage in trying to lose a ton of weight over the people they're trying to beat.
I mean, it's the whole thing is just really bizarre.
I think the documentary does a really good job of exposing this cruelty.
as well as the medical irresponsibility and the prioritizing of ratings and money over the physical and mental health of the participants.
