Brief: My Dad Became a MAGA Power Broker (w/Julia Tucker)
Jeffery Tucker is the founder of the MAGA thinktank Brownstone Institute. In 2020, Brownstone published The Great Barrington Declaration, with lead author Jay Bhattacharya—now the nominee for head of the NIH.
Jeffrey’s daughter, Julia, joins Matthew to discuss her dad’s rise through the punditocracy, through decades of fringe libertarian publishing, working for Ron Paul, boosting anarcho-capitalism and crypto, writing for the Epoch Times, and asking such daring questions as: “What’s so wrong about child labour?”
Show Notes
Patreon: Post-Catholic Music (w/Julia Tucker)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
I'd recommend our listeners check out his Skeptical Sunday episode on hydrotherapy, as well as Jordan's episode about Tarina Shaquille, where he interviews an ISIS recruit's journey and escape.
There's an episode for everyone, though, no matter what you're into.
The show covers stories like how a professional art forger somehow made millions of dollars while being chased by the feds and the mafia.
Jordan's also done an episode all about birth control and how it can alter the partners we pick and how going on or off of the pill can change elements in our personalities.
The podcast covers a lot, but one constant is his ability to pull useful pieces of advice from his guests.
I promise you, you'll find something useful that you can apply to your own life, whether that's an actionable routine change that boosts your productivity or just a slight mindset tweak that changes how you see the world.
We really enjoy the show.
We think you will as well.
There's just so much there.
Check out jordanharbinger.com slash start for some episode recommendations or search for The Jordan Harbinger Show.
That's H-A-R-B as in boy, I-N as in Nancy, G-E-R on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
Comedy fans, listen up.
I've got an incredible podcast for you to add to your cue.
Nobody listens to Paula Poundstone.
you probably know that I made an appearance recently on this absolutely ludicrous variety show that combines the fun of a late night show with the wit of a public radio program and the unique knowledge of a guest expert who was me at the time, if you can believe that.
Brace yourself for a rollercoaster ride of wildly diverse topics from Paula's hilarious attempts to understand QAnon to riveting conversations with a bona fide rocket scientist.
You'll never know what to expect, but you'll know you're in for a high spirited, hilarious time.
So this is comedian Paula Poundstone and her co-host Adam Felber, who is great.
They're both regular panelists on NPR's classic comedy show.
You may recognize them from that, Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me.
And they bring the same acerbic yet infectiously funny energy to Nobody Listens to Paula Poundstone.
When I was on, they grilled me in an absolutely unique way about conspiracy theories and yoga and yoga pants and QAnon, and we had a great time.
They were very sincerely interested in the topic, but they still found plenty of hilarious angles in terms of the questions they asked and how they followed up on whatever I gave them like good comedians do.
Check out their show.
There are other recent episodes you might find interesting as well, like hearing crazy Hollywood stories from legendary casting director Joel Thurm or their episode about killer whales and killer theme songs.
So Nobody Listens to Paula Poundstone is an absolute riot you don't want to miss.
Find Nobody Listens to Paula Poundstone on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to your podcasts.
Hello, everyone.
Welcome to Conspirituality Podcast, where we investigate the intersection of conspiracy theories and spiritual influence to uncover cults, pseudoscience, and authoritarian extremism.
I'm Matthew Remski.
We are on Instagram and threads at ConspiritualityPod, and you can access all of our episodes ad-free, plus our Monday bonus episodes on Patreon, or just our bonus episodes via Apple subscriptions.
Be aware, however, that if you subscribe through Apple, they're now tacking on an extra 30%, because capitalism, why not?
But you can always download and listen through the Patreon app.
We really appreciate your support.
And if you're a Patreon already, you might have a friend or family member who will also appreciate the support that comes in the form of filling their ears with our immense catalog of bonus content.
Because Patreon now has gift memberships that you can purchase for friends and family members.
And you can choose the tier and amount.
You can hook an unsuspecting person into our feed for up to a year.
So please consider that as the holiday draws near.
Today's brief is called My Dad Became a MAGA Power Broker with guest Julia Tucker.
The dad in question today is Jeffrey Tucker, who just turned 61.
And he's the founder of the Brownstone Institute, which published the Great Barrington Declaration in 2020 with lead author Jay Bhattacharya.
who's now the nominee for the National Institute of Health Directorship.
So, Jeffrey Tucker is now well within striking distance of great influence within the new Maha-Maga regime.
This comes after decades of libertarian publishing, boosting anarcho-capitalism and cryptocurrency.
He's worked for Ron Paul, the Mises Institute, and he now writes for the Epoch Times.
But who are these people we keep profiling?
What are they really like?
Where do they start out?
How do they change over time?
We rarely get a view like we have today because my guest is Jeffrey's daughter, Julia, who joined me for a Patreon bonus all the way back in January called Post Catholic Music.
She's currently estranged from her dad.
She's a professional church organist in Savannah, Georgia.
And she talked with me about what it was like to grow up in Jeffrey's trad cath home and inherit his love of liturgical music, but then begin to go her separate way.
She discussed her long, strange trip out of Catholic revanchism, the unexpected freedoms of homeschooling, and why she believes that figures like Bishop Strickland and the Catholics heading up Project 2025 are more ominous and effective than evangelical leaders and why she believes that figures like Bishop Strickland and the And
A few weeks ago, Julia texted me with a screenshot of a social media post, and it was a photo of her dad standing arm-in-arm with RFK Jr. at a Trump campaign event, possibly at Mar-a-Lago.
Now, I had a sense of how strange that must be for her to see, so I asked if she wanted to come back on and share what it's like, on a very human level, to see her dad become a MAGA power broker.
She said, absolutely yes.
So here we are.
Let's roll it.
Julia Tucker, welcome back to Conspirituality Podcast.
Thank you, Matthew.
It's great to be here.
We're going to keep this really focused, concise, and as objective as possible, which might be a little bit difficult, you know, because on one hand, as Jeffrey Tucker's daughter, you're going to have a lot of memories and thoughts and feelings about the man that are super informed, but quite personal and I think very subjective.
And out of that, I want to pick out the threads that, well, first of all, won't get us sued by him or the Brownstone Institute, will mainly serve to clarify how his peculiar pathway through libertarianism and Catholicism transformed him into a power broker in the MAGA movement.
So, you know, is taking a shot at objectivity okay for you?
Yeah.
Yeah, I'll give it my best shot.
Okay.
And why, I guess we should start by establishing, did you say yes to coming back on to talk about your dad?
What is it about your political values and instincts that makes this an important time to speak?
Yeah, I've obviously observed Jeff over many years and I've seen him align himself with a lot of different institutions and ideologies.
But they've always been on the fringes of society.
And this is the first time that I've seen him align himself with a populist Republican movement.
I think that speaks to a lot of the things that you guys talk about on the pod all the time, these sort of shifting priorities and shifting associations.
As I shared the previous time we talked, I grew up in the church.
It deeply shaped my character.
And although I've laid aside a lot of the beliefs that I was raised with, the values of integrity, living out your beliefs in actionable ways, And telling the truth even when it comes at a personal cost, those ones really stuck.
There's a lot of aspects to Trump's election and, you know, what's coming as a result of that.
But one of the most interesting and also most dangerous things is the people that he's appointing into power.
And suddenly that has put Jeff a lot closer to real political power than he's been in the past.
And that's why, you know, I reached out to you, Matthew, and I think this is kind of a unique time in Jeff's career.
Yeah, and there is a trope about the Fox News dad, but usually that's pointing to someone who is maybe self-isolated, maybe introverted and a little bit bitter, maybe with a frayed social network, but also a vigorous poster on Facebook.
But as we're going to see, Jeffrey is very much not in the closet.
He's very much all the way out there.
Yeah, absolutely.
Now, for those who didn't listen to your listener story on our Patreon, can you just give us a five kind of bullet point, bare bones summary of growing up with Jeffrey as a homeschooling trad cath?
Absolutely.
Jeff converted to Catholicism a couple years before I was born, and he pretty quickly fell into the kind of radical traditionalist fringe element.
My siblings and I were all homeschooled.
We grew up in a small town in Alabama while Jeffrey was working for a kind of right-wing libertarian think tank at the time.
We were also driving two hours one way to attend a Latin mass.
I think at some point that became too much for a family of six.
So Jeff launched his one-man attempt to reform the liturgy of our local mainstream Catholic parish instead.
That's how it happens, right?
Like gas prices are really high, and so you've got to get local with the traditional Latin mass.
Exactly.
But overall, I would say that my homeschool education was a pretty odd mix of sort of unconventional libertarian and trad-cath revisionist history, coupled with a real focus on music.
Thankfully, the music stuck.
I became a professional classical musician, but thank goodness the fringe beliefs did not.
So I want to direct listeners to this Patreon episode because we spend a lot more time on the nuances of that particular childhood, and it's a really fascinating story.
One thing that I do want to flag before we go on is that, paradoxically, homeschooling And the rigors of homeschooling and parents who have six kids who are trying to homeschool will often rely on public resources to actually bear some of the weight.
And in that case, in your case, it meant you spending a lot of time in the public library, which may not have directed you exactly as Jeff might have wanted you to go.
Yeah, absolutely.
It was, I mean, also paradoxically, a sort of government publicly funded library was the key to discovering sort of, I think, intellectual freedom in a lot of ways.
I have a question about the best part of him.
Because, you know, again, if listeners go to that Patreon episode, they'll hear you speak a lot about the relationship that you had with music.
What qualities really shone through in Jeffrey's love for liturgical music?
He has an incredible energy and zeal to him.
And his love for diving very deeply and very passionately into a topic really came through in his approach to liturgical music.
And those are qualities that energy, that zeal, those are qualities that I see in myself quite a bit, and those are qualities that I treasure, and I see actually a direct sort of link.
I got those from him.
I also see in his love for music his artist soul and his love for beauty.
And I know that that creativity and imagination is still somewhere there in him, despite it being so smothered in recent years.
I hear what you're saying, and I tend to share some of that sense of the politics of art, this sense that if you really plunge into music or anything like it in a serious way, that it's going to lead you away from...
Yeah, unfortunately, there's some key data points that point against that.
But, you know, I would say that even the conservatives, even the right-wingers are a little bit better off with access to beauty and to great art.
Okay, well that's a whole other, we should have you back on and we can explore that at some point.
But I have a basic contradiction question as we sort of flesh out this pathway that he's taken.
How does a libertarian become a tradcast?
Like what in your dad's path makes sense about that?
So he's not the only one.
In fact, there were quite a few traditionalist Catholics that worked for that libertarian think tank in Alabama.
Beyond that, there's a lot of crossover between libertarian sort of social groups and trad Catholicism.
And I know you guys on the pod have covered those connections a little bit here and there.
But from my perspective, both of those ideologies, trad Catholicism and libertarianism, Hang together on a mistrust of institutions and their gatekeepers.
Trad Catholics have a highly contentious relationship with the Catholic hierarchy.
They are very suspicious of their local priests and bishops.
And of course, currently, they're especially suspicious of the Pope.
So they have a very sort of strained relationship with this institution that they claim to represent the most authentic part of.
Similarly, libertarians, despite claiming to embody the sort of authentic American patriotism of the founding fathers, they have a profound mistrust of essentially every aspect of government.
Everything from the Federal Reserve to public education to even local municipality road maintenance.
So they also have this deeply contradictory relationship.
And I think that mistrust really strings those two ideologies together.
I think Pope Francis is such a fascinating figure here because on one side I can imagine the libertarian who's like, yeah, I think it's great that you're having lunch every Wednesday with trans sex workers from this Italian village because, I mean, everybody has to be themselves, right?
We shouldn't put restrictions on things and aren't you bucking tradition in the best, finest possible way?
But then, of course, there's going to be a social conservatism that is profoundly distrustful of the politics of inclusivity.
It's very strange as a mixture.
And also, there's this mistrust that you're talking about that also depends on a fantasy, it seems.
Because, for instance, the Sedevigantists believe that the seat of Peter is empty, that there is no pope actually.
But I think that has to mean that for them, there is a more perfect church out there somewhere, ideally.
And I think that libertarians who look to Trump also have to imagine some sort of perfect but unrealized state that they can achieve.
I think there's a nostalgia there for a time and a place that never existed for both of those groups.
Yeah.
Okay, here's another contradiction I wanted to ask you about.
I guess it's the next one, which is how does a libertarian become a tradcath, but then a supporter of Trump's authoritarianism?
Jeff's sellout to MAGA was truly shocking to me at first.
For better or for worse, he's always been somebody who's bucked the mainstream.
For better or for worse, he always inspired in me a taste for radicalism and a taste for original, unconventional thought.
I think a deeper look at libertarianism reveals some clues there.
Libertarianism, while claiming to be about freedom and liberty, really fundamentally rests on a might makes right proposition.
At the end of the day, it's a proposed political system Those with power and money are allowed to do whatever they want without constraint from government and whatever they want usually ends up being some version of using that power and wealth to take advantage of the poor and the disenfranchised.
While disavowing that that's what they're doing, because they're just living their lives.
Absolutely.
And it's dressed up in ways like the free market always decides what's best, but it inevitably ends up with a strong undercurrent of authoritarianism at its core.
I think if a lot of libertarians, including Jeff, were able to be honest with themselves, it's actually that authoritarianism that is the draw.
And understood in this light, it's not a surprise that Jeff and others from the Libertarian Party have sold out to the strongman caricature that Trump represents.
On a personal level, I think that Trump represents everything that Jeff wants to be.
You know, the man who does whatever he wants.
He's unbeholden to his principles, his values, or duty of the institutions or duty of the role that's been placed upon him.
Trump is about to hold the highest elected office in our country while showing nothing but disdain for it and destructive impulses for our government and the rule of law.
And so someone like Jeff doesn't just admire Trump in spite of that flaw.
He admires Trump because of it.
Do you think there is a coherent criticism of corruption behind that somewhere?
Like, you know, my specialized knowledge or skill excuses me from participating in these institutions that are obviously bankrupt.
I don't have to be beholden to them.
I'm better than them because I know how terrible they are.
There's definitely an element of narcissism there for sure, of just thinking I am above others.
But I think that's wrapped up in...
In the sort of core of libertarian ideology as well, it's not a coincidence that the people who claim to be libertarians are also people who occupy, you know, the sort of most privileged aspect of society.
If you go to the conferences, which I did a lot as a kid, it's a lot of straight white men there.
And so it's easy to feel like you deserve to be on top in that situation.
Turning now to the sort of professional pathway, I'm labeling this question like, so what do you actually do for work?
It seems that Jeffrey bounced from fringe job to fringe job over a long, winding path.
Now, how did that impact the family and his politics, do you think?
Jeff has made his career being a writer and a commentator for a lot of right-wing libertarian think tanks.
He's been a prolific writer over the years and he's generated just a vast amount of content on a huge variety of topics, very little of it carefully considered.
But he's made his niche being the person who's willing to write that idea that's a little bit distasteful, a little bit controversial, maybe a little bit ugly.
Yeah, like, why should we really outlaw child labor?
Why should there be a minimum smoking age?
Things like that.
Right.
You know, why should the government really tell us we have to wear a seatbelt?
What was so wrong with the coal mines anyway?
Now, he wouldn't have wanted you as a kid working in a coal mine, smoking cigarettes on your break and driving to and through without seatbelts, right?
Like, it didn't apply to you, did it?
In some ways it did.
I mean, we were encouraged to smoke very young and we definitely never wore seatbelts.
So he did stick by his principles, I suppose.
That's amazing.
So what's the idea behind smoking?
That, well, you'll get over it or you might as well try it or exposure therapy or something?
Lung cancer is not real, Matthew.
Oh, really?
Well, I'm overplaying it, but he says that the dangers of lung cancer have been vastly overplayed by the government.
It's all been an anti-smoking campaign.
You should just smoke away.
You'll be fine.
Okay.
All right.
I will say on a personal level, I did smoke for almost 15 years.
Oh, really?
Yes, I did.
And I'm 30. So that gives you an idea of how young I was when I started smoking.
But I quit smoking, I think almost two years ago now, because I finally Googled and it turns out it's actually really bad for you.
That's incredible, Julia.
So you had intellectual and political awakenings through, you know, access to public libraries, but that wasn't really in the sector.
You didn't open that particular book, it seems.
Yeah, and it's funny, as I kind of came into the process of adulthood, one little thread at a time started to unravel.
But oddly, I think the smoking one took the longest.
I just have to say that...
I feel so much better since quitting.
It turns out it actually is really bad for you.
Yeah.
Okay, well, one of the things listeners to the Patreon episode will know is that we connected over the fact that we are – well, I'm no longer, but you are a professional church organist.
That used to be my job.
Mm-hmm.
And we do come from a long line of people who are sneaking out whenever they can to get a smoke because they also feel like they're kind of separate from the entire ritual and, you know, you need a break from listening to all of the stuff because you really want to get back to the music.
So there's that too.
And I can imagine that that's actually, if it bakes itself, so to speak, into the way, your rhythm of your life, that it is really hard to give up.
Oddly for me, I found that it was not difficult to quit.
I know others have not had that experience, but I just decided one day, okay, I'm not going to smoke anymore, and that was it.
And then I thought, I'm an idiot.
Why didn't I do that way earlier?
It's so funny.
We've got some intersections because I actually remember quitting smoking when In a single moment, when I actually, I was bringing a cigarette to my lips, I was about to light it, and I said to myself, or a voice came to me from somewhere, what the fuck are you doing?
What are you actually doing?
And I actually, I don't, this seems to be, you know, I don't want to pat myself on my back or give anybody any false hope, but I actually didn't really have cravings after that.
I had the same experience.
I was 28. And then I think, I mean, really, I Googled and I saw a picture of what happens to your lungs when you smoke.
And then I looked at the back of the box for the first time.
And I said to myself, Julia, what the fuck are you doing?
You're too old for this bullshit.
And that was it.
Wow.
Well, I guess that's a little bit of libertarianism as well, which is, you know, you could just pick yourself up by the bootstraps and make a decision and stop smoking.
Yeah, yeah.
But, you know, back to Jeff, like, he's the person who kind of says that little thing in your head that you might think or that you might say to yourself but you'd never say in public.
Jeff will just put that on paper and just write it and publish it for the world to see.
And he's really made his career doing that.
And people, he's always found a market for people who want to read that little dirty thought that they would never say but they like to read.
Right now, Jeff has a daily column with the Epoch Times.
I think even most right-wing commentators would find association with that news outlet and the Falun Gong religious movement behind it kind of distasteful, but that doesn't bother Jeff at all.
In a lot of ways, I think he's kind of a chameleon.
He'll say or write what he needs to in order to ingratiate himself with whoever is willing to pay him.
Now, everything changes with Jeffrey Tucker sponsoring and publishing and, I believe, co-writing bits of the Great Barrington Declaration through the Brownstone Institute.
Now, did that kind of constitute his great arrival in life?
I think it certainly felt that way to him.
The Great Barrington Declaration hit the mainstream in a way that I really don't think even Jeffrey expected.
You know, after spending 40 years churning out this huge variety of content, much of it inconsistent or self-contradictory, the Great Barrington Declaration, I think in some ways by chance, hit it big.
And for Jeff, I think it felt like finally receiving the recognition he had been striving for for so long.
At the time, the Great Barrington Declaration was widely mocked by the scientific establishment.
But there were two things of note that stood out to me when it was published.
The first is that someone in the Trump administration mentioned it in a press release.
And the second is that a few sort of personal friends and associates mentioned it to me, with the conservatives mentioning it very positively.
And that had really never happened before.
I had never seen Jeff kind of cross that barrier from the fringe to, oh, suddenly I'm reading about I think it was almost random that he finally hit something that tapped the right cultural current at the right time.
Yeah, it's COVID, right?
Yeah, and I have to say, on a personal note, the Great Barrington Declaration hit in a very strange way because in October of 2020, the month that it was published, that was the month that my husband and I both started participation in the AstraZeneca vaccine, COVID vaccine trials.
Absolutely.
That's amazing.
Yeah, and that was something that he and I had both felt very strongly called to do, and I have to say we really had a blast doing it.
But when the Great Barrington Declaration came out that same month, although at that point I knew that Jeff and I had not agreed on politics for years, the depth of our divergence in that moment really struck me.
But, you know, here we are four years later.
The Great Barrington Declaration was Jeff's pathway into launching the Brownstone Institute, which essentially does full-time medical and political disinformation publishing.
And, you know, he's not a scientist or an epidemiologist.
But let's say that he bought into everything that Jay Bhattacharya and colleagues were laying out in the Great Barrington Declaration.
Like, would he have had any concern about bypassing the accepted method of scientific publication?
Yeah.
Absolutely not.
I think the bypassing was the point, and it plays into that kind of contrarianism.
He did tell another family member around this time that he had recently read Epidemiology for Dummies.
It's kind of incredible to me because in some ways, and Julian talks about this all the time, this kind of thing is completely technologically facilitated, right?
It's like, if you can do it, if you can publish the thing, if you can make it look like it's a scientific paper, if you have the sort of networks to spread it around, then why wouldn't you do it?
Why would you be beholden to any gatekeepers whatsoever?
I mean, there's a psychology there, but it's also like anybody can just do that.
They kind of messed up a little bit, though, in the process, because if you remember, they opened the signatures to anyone and they had all of this phony, fake signatures with very funny names.
Yeah, Dr. Banana Pants.
Exactly.
So I think at some point they had to lock the signatures down.
Dr. Polio Lover, yeah.
Okay, but were you kids vaccinated?
Yeah.
I was vaccinated as a kid.
Jeff's anti-vaccine ideas are a fairly recent development.
I can say, though, that there's been a suspicion of the medical establishment over his adult life that has only deepened as he's gotten older.
We saw doctors less and less as I grew up.
At some point, Jeff found an online Indian pharmacy that he could order antibiotics from.
So he started opting for throwing Z-packs at any ailment that came up.
Viral, bacterial, it didn't matter.
Just throw a Z-pack at it.
But the full-on anti-vax stuff didn't become part of his worldview until COVID. I think it's a situation where his libertarian anarcho-capitalist ideology could not allow him to admit that maybe government funding was able to do some good or be beneficial for humanity.
So, of course, he had no option but to demonize the COVID vaccine as either ineffective or some sort of dangerous bioweapon conspiracy.
He regularly characterized it as both, despite those seeming to be fairly contradictory statements.
I think this notion of you going to the doctor less as you're growing up, but you might also be developing an antibiotics resistance because you're taking too many Z-packs is kind of stunning.
And it really shows how, I don't know, belief piles upon belief, attitude piles upon attitude, and the effects really multiply.
Yeah.
Well, but, and the, how as belief builds on belief, they, it can sometimes be very contradictory.
You know, throwing Z-packs at your kids seems to be, you know, the opposite of the sort of, you know, Maha focus on natural, you know, natural medicines or natural solutions.
But I really think the through line is just that anything that seemed to operate outside of the medical establishment was fair game.
Yeah, it's not that natural means natural.
It's that natural means I'm doing it.
Exactly.
We were also really big into cod liver oil as well, which again seems to kind of like, well, are we doing the natural supplements thing or are we just throwing antibiotics at any ailment?
Those seem contradictory on some level.
Did you ever take the antibiotics pills with caudal liver oil?
To just really double up on the effects to make sure that your ear infection is okay to go?
Right.
But also, you know, there's mentholated cigarettes too that would help with bronchial infection, right?
Well, it's funny you say that because I do remember just saying something about- I was joking.
You know what?
I'm going to tell a joke and then you're going to tell a story.
Okay, go ahead.
Well, something about menthol, like clearing the lungs.
So that was the healthiest form of cigarette to smoke.
And that is what I smoked for years.
Oh, man.
You felt all refreshed when you came back from the break?
Oh, yes.
You know, it just hits- Okay, well, speaking of holism and its contradictions, we're communicating on WhatsApp, and you send me a photo of Jeffrey arm-in-arm with RFK Jr. during a campaign event.
It might be at Mar-a-Lago.
We're not sure where it is.
But what goes through your mind when you see that?
And why is Jeffrey dressed like a 19th century count?
Yeah, when I saw that photo, it launched me into orbit.
You know, for my entire life, Jeff has occupied a decidedly fringe part of the political spectrum.
And when I saw that photo, I found it on his Twitter.
When I saw that photo, it made me realize this guy is no longer fringe.
And of course, that photo was followed a couple days later by the announcement of Jay Bhattacharya, Jeff's friend and co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, being nominated by Trump to lead the NIH. And I realized that for the first time in his life, Jeff suddenly had proximity to real political power.
And that was terrifying to me.
As far as the count costume, you know...
Let's just say there's a cape.
There's a cape?
It's a long black cape.
There seems to be a fairly high collar to it.
He has very, I would say, what's the word?
They're kind of fancy, very round glasses, gold-framed glasses.
Yeah.
He's standing out.
He does not look like RFK Jr. in his, like, 1960s skinny tie, you know, ready to go to Gold's Gym and work out for sure.
Yeah, not at all.
I don't think the cape would fit in at Gold's Gym.
Well...
Unless the pro wrestlers showed up, right?
Yeah, exactly.
Jeff is somebody who has a deeply complex relationship with his own identity and past.
He's a guy from West Texas who was raised Baptist and later fell in with the...
The Washington, D.C., sort of traditionalist Catholic and classical liberal, you know, political conservative crowd.
And I think he felt that that necessitated an aesthetics change.
Right.
As he's become stranger over the years, the costume has gotten more extreme.
So when I was a kid, it was a preference for bow ties.
He moved into Victorian-era fashion.
Detachable starched collars about a decade ago.
And I think capes are just the newest accoutrement.
We talk a lot of shit about these people, but there is some diversity, right?
Because there's room for that.
There's room for Trump's hair plugs.
There's room for all of the sort of bro-scientist leisure wear and hoodies and stuff like that.
It's a diverse group, wouldn't you say?
Yeah.
Yeah, absolutely.
All costumes welcome in the new Republican Party.
Finishing up, first of all, I want to really thank you for...
For speaking to this.
It's a very unique kind of interview, and I appreciate that you're able to express your concern and your memory and give listeners some insight into how something like this unfolds.
And what kind of personalities are involved more generally in this movement?
So it's really helpful.
And I hope, too, that it feels to Jeff's friends, or even Jeff, if he hears this, that he's being taken seriously as a person, right?
Yeah.
Absolutely.
Yeah.
And that somehow we're going to have to figure all of this out.
But as we do, maybe we can finish with just a hypothetical question, which is that if you had one comment to make about Jeffrey Tucker in front of a group of people who were earnestly trying to assess his political intentions and capacities, like, what would that comment be?
What would you say?
Yeah.
I would say to someone, I would say to look at Jeff's record.
You know, look at his record of sensationalist writing, of shifting alignments.
His Twitter feed is a real trip at the moment if someone wants to take a look.
It is.
But don't take my opinion for it.
Read for yourself what he has argued he stands for and who he has claimed to be and compare it to his current rhetoric.
He does not feel compelled to be consistent with his own past or record and does really not feel the need to reference an external standard of truth or fact.
He's been a paleo-libertarian, a traditionalist Catholic, a gold standard guy, a crypto guru, an anti-copyright zealot, an attempted social media CEO, a Gregorian chant guy, a book publisher of Fringe Ideas – an infectious disease expert, an anarcho-capitalist.
So whiplash to whiplash to whiplash.
Yeah.
And what does this say about his character?
Does it suggest that he's somebody who should be trusted to tell the truth about what's happening in our country, in the world, or that he should be trusted with power and political influence?
And then, you know, it brings up the question beyond that.
What does it say about our country and the political party that's about to take power that a man like Jeff is literally arm in arm with our next head of Health and Human Services?
Julia Tucker, thank you so much for your time.
Yes, of course, Matthew.
Thanks for having me on.
And do take care of your lungs.
I hear that mullin tea is really good for detoxing or restoring lung function.
Maybe you can start your own supplements line or something like that, and that might reunite you with...
Yes, you can use my code ORGANIST for 20% off.
Yeah.
All right.
Well, let's keep breathing deeply and we'll keep keeping safe.
