Erika Kirk’s speech at the convention—her forgiveness of Charlie Kirk’s alleged killer—strikes Candace Owens as "complete submission to Christ," but she questions Turning Point USA’s claim that his extraordinary bone density stopped a bullet without an exit wound, citing expert skepticism and federal inconsistencies like Cash Battelle’s investigation statement contradicting Derek Maxfield’s Instagram post. Owens highlights suspicious details: a repaved area near the shooting, the shooter’s resemblance to Timothy McVeigh, and UVU’s possible underground tunnels, while warning of intelligence officers from the LDS campus influencing the probe. She dismisses Laura Loomer’s CIA report as baseless but insists on uncovering truth, linking Kirk’s death to broader federal credibility issues like Epstein gaslighting, and urging support for pro-life, health, and financial causes amid ongoing speculation about his posthumous donor backlash. [Automatically generated summary]
Erica Kirk, man, that she really is just the moment.
The speech that she gave, everybody was just wowed by her.
I felt my energy personally, like last night going into that.
I was effectively like soaring in the air above the convention center, like a dragon above, waiting for Erica to just be like, fire.
And I was just going to come down and swoop in out of nowhere.
All the politicians, all the fake people, everyone was just going to be in that moment toast.
But she didn't call for war.
Erica did not call for war.
In fact, she did the exact opposite, which is what was so stunning.
It was unbelievable.
The forgiveness that she granted, the strength that it took for her to call for that forgiveness.
It's just unmatched and it really made a difference.
And I was being serious when I tweeted that I think it was the most consequential speech in American history, a message that everyone needed to hear, including myself, a message of complete submission to Christ.
And by the way, later on, we're also going to discuss another kind of submission to Christ, which is submitting yourself to truth.
Cash Battelle has now come out and issued a statement fully capitulating to the public, the public insistence that they're lying to us.
They are so clearly lying to us about what happened on the day that Charlie Kirk lost his life.
Nothing they've told us thus far makes any sense.
And somehow it's only getting worse.
So welcome back.
Let's jump right into this.
I have to say any woman that can get on stage and meaningfully say that they forgive the person who killed their husband that quickly.
you are truly a better person than me because I've just been so angry and so angry.
And yet she was able to, through tears, and obviously you could tell how difficult that moment was for her, but she arrived at forgiveness and she did it in front of the entire world.
And I think that every single person should watch that speech.
Truly, they should watch that speech.
They should watch Tucker Carlson's speech.
I don't think even showing you clips of it, I'm going to show you one, could do it justice.
You should watch it in its entirety.
The emotion, the message of it.
And you can obviously see why Charlie fell in love with her, right?
I remember meeting Erica.
We were at Charlie and I were in New York for something, one another, and he was falling for her hard, but he wanted to play cool.
So he's like, come meet her at Del Frisco's in New York City.
And I came there and she was just lovely.
She was genuinely such a nice person.
I was like, Charlie, just go for it.
Just go for it.
And he did go for it.
And last night, I really do think that the entire world needed to hear her message.
What you took from it, how you could apply it to your life is up to you.
But specifically, the part that she shared that provided me with so much peace, and I needed to hear it truly, was when she explained that Charlie did not suffer.
Because that thinking about that is, I just, I really shed so many tears over it, just thinking that he suffered even for a moment.
I mean, that it's just beautiful to really think about that.
Um, that he just blinked and then he was with the Lord.
And it is just a fact that Charlie just loved the Lord.
It was constantly, like I told you, going through the conversations and how much he would just say, I need to pray about it, I need to pray about it, I need to pray about it, wanting to marry Erica.
First thing he said, which I think I showed you guys last week.
And Erica is correct.
It is important to remember that message of forgiveness that we have within ourselves.
And it sometimes feels very hard to do that, but we do, we are called upon to forgive people, to forgive our enemies, even in moments that it seems impossible or extraordinary to do so.
But it is also important, it's not really a but, but I just want to assert that it is also important to remember that what Christ is, as I said at the top of this show, is truth, right?
Christ is truth.
And we are not getting the truth right now of what happened to Charlie Kirk on 9:10.
And to be very clear, I am going to need it.
I demand it.
In fact, I'm now currently working on a minute-by-minute timeline, which I will have for you guys later this week, of what exactly happened in the seconds and minutes following Charlie getting shot.
I need to know.
I need to follow bodies.
I've already been able to, as I asked over the weekend, locate George Zinn in the crowd.
It seems a bit suspicious to me how far he was.
And then suddenly they take him through a pathway.
I mean, that's him right there.
Thank you to the person that sent this picture.
But then I find him on video, and I'm trying to understand how he made it down the pathway and was taken through to the same area that they had just taken Charlie in the car.
I have a lot of questions, and each and every one of them will be answered by the end of this investigation.
And I also want to put it to you this way: so much more has come to light that I have not yet presented.
I am working with other journalists, different aspects, asking them, Hey, you look into this, I'm going to look into that.
And the first thing that I think I should make abundantly clear is I am relieved that Erica Kirk is at the head of Turning Point USA, because just like I alluded to last week, and which I will double down on now, I believe that people within that company betrayed Charlie.
Okay, that's just what I believe right now.
And I want to make sure that I have these facts entirely on my side before I tell you guys more.
I will say: if you are a rat on a ship, you should probably flee now.
I want to be clear: I didn't think that that episode was going to have the reaction that it did, but I am grateful.
We were unpacking the footage that was going viral of the guy that was taking down the camera, which was directly behind Charlie's head, a mere approximate four minutes after Charlie was shot.
Everybody thought that it was very suspicious.
I recognized the individual and reached out, had a conversation, saw the footage, and made the promise that I was not going to share it.
Although I said to you, I encouraged them to share it.
I believe that the reason everybody is a conspiracy theorist is because people don't share truth, right?
Once you share everything, there's no room for conspiracy.
And when I was sharing what I saw, I was doing so because I was just thinking that, you know, this could help.
Like, this can obviously remove people from their conspiracies.
And then it kind of occurred to me that what I shared was a bigger deal than I had imagined by saying that I didn't see any blood.
In fact, the only blood that I did see at all, and I'm talking about blood in the back, was on Charlie's hand, on Charlie's left hand, which, as many people have been saying, means that the blood moved forward.
We don't need to get into all of the gore.
But what I didn't expect thereafter was for the Turning Point USA spokesperson, Andrew Colvet, to issue this statement as people were asking questions: like, hey, how is that possible?
How was there nothing in the back if this is the gun that was used?
Andrew Colvett tweeted this over the weekend.
I want to address some of the discussion about the lack of an exit wound with Charlie.
I'm usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter.
And I apologize that this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn't an exit wound is probably another miracle.
And I want people to know.
I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital.
He said the bullet, quote, absolutely should have gone through, which is very, very normal for a high-powered, high-velocity round.
I've seen wounds from this caliber many times, and they always just go through everything.
This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, et cetera, end quote.
And then now this is Andrew, but it didn't go through.
Charlie's body stopped it.
I mentioned to his doctor that there were dozens of staff, students, and special guests standing directly behind Charlie on the other side of the tent.
And he replied, It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn't get killed.
His bone, referring to Charlie, was so healthy and the density was so, so impressive that he's like the man of steel.
It should have just gone through and through.
It likely would have killed those standing behind him too.
In the end, the coroner did find the bullet just beneath the skin.
Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him.
Remarkable and miraculous.
End statement.
Now, first, I want to say this because people were attacking Andrew Colvett immediately.
I want to say that it is good to remember that this is Andrew Colvet's literal job.
The spokesperson for TP USA just posted two hours ago that they talked to the coroner and that Charlie Kirk was shot with a 30-odd six in the left side of his neck.
And that he's a man of steel and that the bones in his neck that are like chicken bones stopped a bullet that travels 2,500 feet a second out of the barrel at 200 yards, depending on the grain of the cartridge and the rest of it.
Probably hit him at 1,900 feet per second.
I've shot hogs at 500 yards, 30-odd six, right to the side.
If you were going to bring me to the argument that this truly was a miracle, it probably would not be in the midst of a circumstance where the feds are lying, right?
That that is like not now, right?
Because it could be a miracle also that Tyler Robinson decided to take a break at Dairy Queen and issue some texts that sound like they were written in 1822 and tell every single,
it could just be a miracle, right, for the feds and go through every single detail of exactly how he planned it, why he planned it, including his MAGA dad, who's been extra MAGA lately that he doesn't actually lived with and nobody knows why the dad is extra MAGA lately and explaining where to find the weapon and just a miracle that he happened to leave this letter that has since been disappeared.
But they, you know, he took a picture, his lover took a picture of it.
It could just all be one big federal miracle.
But I'm not inclined to believe that at this moment.
I'm not inclined to believe any of this at this moment.
And so we press on.
Okay.
And because Alex and many other people and hunters and conservatives were going, yeah, no, I mean, people were even posting videos of them shooting to show what that damage would be like.
And I would say I would refer to this as a capitulation to online sleuths.
He tweeted this.
He wrote, as the director of the FBI, I am committed to ensuring the investigation into Charlie Kirk's assassination is thorough and exhaustive, pursuing every lead to its conclusion.
The full weight of America's law enforcement agencies are actively following the evidence that has emerged, but our efforts extend beyond initial findings.
We are examining every facet of this assassination.
We are meticulously investigating theories and questions, including the location from where the shot was taken, the possibility of accomplices, the text message, confession, and related conversations, Discord chats, the angle of the shot and bullet impact, how the weapon was transported, hand gestures observed as potential signals near Charlie at the time of his assassination,
and visitors to the alleged shooter's residence in the hours and the days leading up to September 10th, 2025.
Some details are known today, while others are still being pursued to ensure every possibility is considered.
Our primary focus is to complete this investigation and deliver justice.
To protect the integrity of the investigation and subsequent prosecution, we cannot release every piece of information that we have to the public right now.
We will ensure every question is addressed at the appropriate moment regarding specific details, such as questions about the plane that allegedly turned off its transponder after departing from an airport near the assassination site.
We can share updates when answers are confirmed.
After interviews with the pilot and consultation with the FAA, we determined the transponder was not turned off.
Incomplete flight data in rural areas caused the apparent gap.
The entire FBI mourns the loss of Charlie Kirk.
We will not rest until justice is served in our investigation into this assassination.
We'll continue until every question is answered.
Okay, so first thing that I can very quickly debunk is when he says that they looked into the transponder thing and yeah, we checked it out and actually they just lost service.
Okay, that disputes what the plane owner themselves, he identified himself, Derek Maxfield, and issued a long statement on Instagram where he said that they got permission to turn off services, which are transponder services, and they got that permission from the air traffic controller.
So it can't be both.
It can't be, no, it never happened, they just lost service, and Derek Maxfield saying, no, we had communication with the ATC, which is air traffic control, and what we did followed guidelines.
So that's already a problem.
Secondly, saying that you're not going to release information because you want to protect the integrity of the investigation while also releasing those ridiculous text messages that looked like somebody was having fun on TikTok and making, you know, a ridiculous skit.
I don't feel like the investigation has much integrity or the feds in general have any integrity after you guys gaslit us about Jeffrey Epstein.
So if you want us to, or if you want to restore credibility to the feds, I would allow the mommy sleuths to take over.
That's my opinion.
I had to get in touch and allow the internet to do what the internet does because now you're answering everything that we brought up.
Not me, we, because I am, it is because of the entire world paying attention, sending tips.
I'm grateful to God that I have a platform to be able to share that information and to encourage it.
But this is just coming from regular people around the world.
And now you guys are, it feels like playing defense because you have not been playing offense.
So yeah, that would be my free advice that's not going to be listened to.
But while I have your attention, I do have a few more questions that could be answered, or maybe some leads that you guys could be exploring, if you will.
Because once we began learning about that house next door that's been vacant and is owned by UVU, and once we began looking into the witnesses and finding a common last name and looking into Caldera engineering,
as we did last week, again, not implying that they did anything wrong, just telling you factually that that witness whose footage ended up in the hands of TMZ runs an engineering company that has a presence worldwide and they specialize in making these valves.
I started thinking, once people told me that valves historically have a connection to the government and the deep state about how important those valves were to warfare, because if you just want to shut down someone's pipe pipeline, let's say you want to shut off water or you want to shut off gasoline, yeah, it makes sense why the government would want to be controlling pipelines and valves.
But, anyways, I started to ask myself, oh, well, is anybody looking into whether or not there was anything under Charlie Kirk when he was shot?
Because if we aren't accepting the narrative that that particular gun at that distance didn't pass through, and yet for whatever reason, the Fed scrambled to repave that area.
Maybe, as some people have speculated, he was shot from a closer distance.
I started wondering: was there an access point to any valves?
Were there any pipelines that could have been under Charlie?
And as it turns out, I looked at some old pictures of where he was sitting, and there was a massive pipeline that was almost exactly behind where Charlie was sitting.
Here's that, that, maybe it's a water pipeline.
I don't know, but there it is under the flag.
And to your right, I went into my tips line and I saw that somebody had messaged me about this.
More than one person has messaged me about this.
Like, hey, yeah, there's like a whole underground thing there.
And to your right, you're observing those two little boxes, and they told me that that was a trapdoor.
Now, I'm not implying someone, you know, popped up and shot Charlie, but that's a close-up of that area.
I'm just implying that there's an entire underground there.
And I remember when I looked at the footage, I felt like it was coming up.
I don't know anything about ballistics.
I'm not an expert.
But if there was a hatch door nearby, then we can assume, as we should always assume with colleges, obviously stadiums, there's always an underground path.
So I'm wondering if the federal government has explored the possibility that somebody could have been under Charlie and done that.
While everyone's looking around and thinking that a shot went off from here, if that was just maybe like decoy number two, and actually Charlie was shot from beneath him, which then could maybe explain why there was no exit wound.
Again, I'm theorizing because I have a right to.
I have a right to think.
And that is interesting to me.
Where does it go?
Where do the tunnels underneath UVU lead to, right?
That's an interesting question.
Maybe everyone's looking up when we should be looking below, right?
Maybe we should be looking below if there is this interest in pipelines.
And I saw that actually where he was sitting, there's a whole irrigation system that's managed by the university.
And so there's definitively stuff beneath Charlie.
Again, I don't know anything about ballistics, but I've been very clear that we will be exploring every lead until we get a proper answer for what happened.
And I think that that would probably be an interesting one for the feds to explore because within 48 hours, I mean, was it 48 hours, Skyler?
They decided to instead pave that area, repave it.
And right now, the greatest silence that is being had right now is around the lives that are ended before they even take their first breath.
If we're going to call ourselves defenders of life, then we should act like it.
That's why I'm asking you to join me to fight back with action, with truth, with love.
For just $28, you can provide a free ultrasound to a woman that is in a crisis and considering an abortion.
$28 will help her see the life inside of her to give her the truth that we know that our current culture will not.
So don't sit this out.
Don't wait for permission.
Be bold, be clear, be unapologetically pro-life.
Go to preborn.org/slash Candace right now.
If you give $28 or you can give 10 times that if you can, this is the line that we absolutely must hold.
We have to stand on it.
We must stand for truth and what is right.
We can save lives from abortion and we can stand firm in the gospel.
Again, that is preborn.org/slash Candace to provide an ultrasound for just $28.
Also going to tell you guys about Just Thrive.
You guys know I love them.
The biggest health secret is not talked about is that everything starts in our gut.
Every single thing starts in our gut.
Every day, your gut is fighting a silent war against processed foods, work stress, the toxins that are in the air that you breathe.
When your gut is in trouble, your whole body will feel it.
Most probiotics don't work.
99% of the traditional brands die in your stomach acid before they even reach your gut.
That's what makes Just Thrive's a spore-based probiotic completely different.
Just Thrive is the only probiotic that is clinically proven to arrive 100% alive in your gut.
It does not, which means it does something that most other probiotics cannot.
It turns your gut into an antioxidant factory, creating protective compounds exactly where you need them most, which means better digestion, healthy immunity, more energy, and easy weight management.
You can take Just Thrive probiotic in the form of a capsule or berry-flavored gummy from their award-winning probiotic to their full line of gut, immune, and brain health supplements.
Just Thrive has been fighting to make Americans healthy again with science-backed solutions that you can trust.
To join the gut health revolution and take control of your health today, visit justthrive.com and save 20% with promo code Candice.
See the difference for yourself or get a full product refund, no questions asked.
Take control today with Just Thrive.
That's justthrivehealth.com with promo code Candice.
As part of her grift to monetize the murder of her quote-unquote best friend, Charlie Kirk, Candace Owens is selling a CIA line of merchandise that is called the Candace Intelligence Agency, which rips off the CIA name and logo.
It is a federal felony to use the CIA seal without license.
She then cites the code and calls, reads it, sends a quote from it, rather, pulls it, and then says, You are likely breaking the law with your CIA merch, Candace.
The CIA can technically sue to get Candace to stop using their logo.
It's really disrespectful to Charlie Kirk and the CIA.
And then she CCs and tags the director of the CIA.
Now, as everybody who watches this show knows, we've been selling that merch since before Charlie got assassinated.
So we just continued our show with the merch that we already sold for our show.
Obviously, our parody off of the CIA, which is perfectly legal, obviously, was related to the fact that we're always investigating things.
So don't let the truth get into your way when you're smearing somebody.
But the audacity to actually tag the director of the CIA and ask us to go to prison or to get into trouble is just, I think it really highlights they're insane.
He just said, look at Amazon committing all of these quote-unquote federal felonies.
And then he says, F Israel first, Laura Loomer.
As just a little side note, that he shows all the t-shirts on Amazon because, like, obviously, you can buy yourself an FBI costume for a Halloween if you'd like to.
But that wasn't enough because last year, I mean, last week was that insane.
Like they just tried to wipe away years of my life by pretending completely fictionalized that Charlie and I had a breakup, right?
Eric Bowling did this.
He said, I even, I don't know if he was even sober on that program because he said he hadn't seen me.
This is Eric Bowling since 2015.
He interviewed me in 2020, so that was weird.
But they were clearly the call went out to just make up something that never happened.
Never happened.
I never had a falling out with Charlie Kirk.
And so this guy, Awesome Jew, who I heard was also in the Hamptons with Bill Ackman and that group of people who went out there, he then tries to cleverly release a text message between Charlie Kirk and an unknown individual.
Text message has no date.
It has no time.
And I'm going to tell you why that is.
And I'm going to tell you exactly when that text message had to have occurred.
But him releasing this tweet spectacularly backfired.
The goal, of course, was to prove that Charlie and Candace had a falling out.
Charlie's talking trash about Candace, except he's not at all.
Instead, what the message did is that it proved exactly what I was saying, that donors and Zionists were attempting to control his speech, my speech, and who he platformed.
So these are the text messages that he shared.
And he wrote exclusive, a close friend of Charlie Kirk shared these messages.
I'm going to guess it's either Seth Dylan or Josh Hammer.
It could not be, but I'm just putting that out there because of the style of the messages.
And he says he was never wavering on Israel.
And they are active, he was actively pushing back on Candace Owens' false narrative.
Now, these are the messages he shared.
This is the friend of Charlie in blue.
He writes, I watched the podcast.
Candace needs to say two things and this will stop in its tracks.
They are fundamental conservative principles.
And she didn't say either.
Quote, Israel is not committing a genocide.
Second quote, 30 dead raped, kidnapped, and beheaded Americans in Gaza makes the fight in Gaza America first.
And then he ended by saying, this is not Ukraine.
He's literally saying what I have to say to make something stop in its tracks, right?
And then Charlie writes, this is right.
I'm really trying to help her.
What else is he going to say to this person?
And then, but it's that second message that I can tell you exactly what the context was because I was messaging Charlie about it and I can tell you the timeframe and why they wiped it is because it's from 2023.
He then writes, it doesn't come natural to her because I truly think she doesn't understand saying that Muslims are forced to live in a Muslim quarter in Israel and that betrays the timeline.
Okay.
So what clearly happened in this text chain is that I tweeted, this is when it all started for me.
And I started getting threats that I had to take it back if I wanted my life back.
No government anywhere has a right to commit a genocide ever.
There is no justification for a genocide.
I can't believe this even needs to be said or is even considered the least bit controversial to state.
That tweet was me responding to something that Brian Mast said in Congress.
He said, there's no such thing as an innocent Palestinian life.
That was grotesque.
So I then started getting peer pressured to correct the tweet, to apologize for the tweet at the time I was at the Daily Wire, that I needed to understand why my tweet was wrong.
Dave Rubin instantly replied and said something about Israel, even though I didn't mention Israel in the tweet.
And by itself, it was, I still stand by that tweet, guys, years on.
And I was being inundated.
Charlie was being inundated.
Like, how could she say this?
How dare she say this thing is so wrong?
And then I hosted somebody who was a Zionist on my show.
And that's what he's referring to, the conversation that I had with Ami Kozak.
And clearly, Charlie probably said to him, you can watch this to get her viewpoints.
Candace is not anti-Semitic.
And that guy is not having it.
He is incensed.
And he is saying, here are the words that we have to hear from Candace.
The reason they stripped that and didn't put the date that it was 2023 is because then it destroys the narrative that they're trying to put out that me and Charlie stopped, had a falling out.
Because obviously I went on tour with Charlie at the beginning of 2024 and I spoke at their conference in the summer of 2024.
And, you know, don't let the facts get in the way of this bizarre narrative that Charlie and I had some falling out last year, which never happened.
Rather, what happened was Charlie was peer pressured by these same individuals that I, you know, for me not to speak at Amfast and I was just like, dude, I don't, I don't even care, which is what I told you.
Now, in terms of his statement there, that Charlie's viewpoints were not changing at all.
These are not words that I put in Charlie's mouth.
You can just go back and watch the things that he was saying.
He hosted a sit-down, which was incredible, actually, to discuss what anti-Semitism is and what anti-Semitism is not.
It was a town hall of sorts with students.
Gen Z, as Megan Kelly said, you can't find anybody beneath the age of 30 that supports Israel.
And Charlie was trying to communicate that their tactics, just like you see in that text message, was hurting their cause.
People are tired of it.
We're tired of being bullied.
For me, they behaved like a mafia.
There's no other way to say it.
My livelihood was being threatened.
And then eventually, obviously, I lost my job behind the scenes, telling me what I had to say if I wanted to, I don't know, still be welcomed into the circle.
And I made a conscious decision to not be welcomed into it.
I don't want to be around people that are behaving like that, that are speaking like the way that person is speaking.
This is like, I try to tell, thank you for saying this.
Because like, this is, I try to tell these people and they're like, we must get more aggressive.
And so like, let me ask a question.
If we were to say, if we were to remove, like, if people said what Tucker said is anti-Semitic, I don't hold that view, but it's like a lot of people on Twitter are like calling us out and like, whatever.
That's not going to happen.
But if we were to cancel Tucker, would anti-Semitism increase or decrease?
unidentified
I think increase because that means any supporter of Tucker Carlson's statement, therefore makes them anti-Semitism.
But the binary that's presented is that if you don't passionately talk about it, you are a hater.
That's probably destructive for everybody involved.
So for me, I'm trying to find this new path, which is, I love Israel.
I visited there.
My wife and I had the best experiences ever.
I saw where Jesus rose from the dead and he walked on water.
But also, I'm an American and I represent a generation that can't afford anything and that we are like flooded with illegals and no one speaks English and our hospitals are clogged.
I think we need to have the prudence to reject the Jew hate.
Like, okay, we're not going to put up with that.
That's dumb.
But also, if you call everyone an anti-Semite, if they don't take a puritanical view of the Netanyahu government, then I think that's bad for everybody.
How many of you guys think when a lawmaker and a man I respect like Ted Cruz uses the Bible to justify aid to Israel, doesn't even know the verse, do you guys think that's like not the best way to approach this?
unidentified
Raise your hand.
Okay.
I think Ted Cruz is Genesis 12, 3.
I think a lot of people see that as off-putting when you look at the New Testament.
Why?
Because I think a lot of people, they look especially at the writings of Paul where he talks about how the new flesh is not the same as the people in the old covenant.
The new flesh is everybody, is everyone's included.
Do you think that APAC represents, again, I'm not saying I believe this, but I think this is what you're saying, that it represents a kind of cutting in line of prioritization away from the American people?
Meaning that, like, okay, we vote, we're citizens, but a separate group gets higher priority because of whatever reasons.
You look like you want to chime in.
Dangerous Conversations Hosting00:06:28
unidentified
The entirety of the idea of a PAC is to represent a group, but the fact that we're allowing a group that doesn't even represent American interests to influence the people who are supposed to be representing us, I have a huge problem with.
And that's why I've said this before, and a lot of people don't like when I say it.
I actually think there's probably like 20 representatives between Senate and House who I think are actually fully doing the work of the American people and don't have the interests of some group holding their sway.
But when you hear that lots of other countries also are lobbying, do you think, I mean, you probably don't know the names of those countries, but it's happening.
Does that upset you equally?
Or is APAC just get all the press because it's so top of mind?
unidentified
If those other ones are doing the same thing, of course.
I do not think that other countries should be telling us how to spend, you know, telling our representatives and people who are here to represent all of us that they should be focusing outside of the United States, America first.
You know, there once was a president who started talking about that, suggesting that the precursor to AIPAC, which became APAC, should register under FARA.
And he ended up getting shot in a moving vehicle in broad daylight with the whole world watching.
So that's a dangerous conversation to be hosting, is what I want to say.
It's a very dangerous conversation to be hosting.
It is incredible that he is in his own words six weeks ago, and they're just lying to that young ethnically Jewish kid who said he was converting to Catholicism.
Amazing if the spirit of what he was saying, if he was the leader and was the spokesperson in the political realm for the Jewish people, they would go a lot further.
They would go a lot further.
Instead, they're making enemies everywhere.
And as they make enemies, they then gaslight, they call their friends in the press, they call you names, and they keep doing more of the thing that made them lose an entire generation of people.
Charlie was trying to help them.
He was trying to help them, as you can see.
As he said, I tell them, who is he talking about when he said that?
I keep telling them this: who is he speaking about?
Listen to Charlie in his own words.
It's ridiculous to pretend like I am saying something that you cannot verify, that Megan Kelly's lying, that Tucker Carlson is lying.
And it is very difficult to not see, as I do, that what I went through beginning in the beginning of 2024 seems to be what Charlie was going through in 2025, which is getting really tired of the pressure of people telling you something that you're doing is wrong or saying is wrong when it so clearly is not.
It's almost like they try to make you think you're in a psychosis, right?
It's a level of gaslighting that you've never seen before.
It's like, how could you say, what did you mean when you said genocide is always wrong?
And I also just want to say that Tucker Carlson was amazing last night as well.
I know he's catching a lot of flack, but what his message was very important.
He shared the story of Christ and that these people who plot and lie and censor and pass laws, all it ever does inevitably is the exact opposite of what they're hoping that it does.
And that really is the lesson of the Lord.
That is the lesson of all of the plots failing.
And here is a clip of what Tucker Carlson had to say last night.
The main thing about Charlie and his message, he was bringing the gospel to the country.
He was doing the thing that the people in charge hate most, which is calling for them to repent.
So how is Charlie's message different?
And Charlie was a political person who was deeply interested in coalition building and in getting the right people in office because he knew that vast improvements are possible politically, but he also knew that politics is not the final answer.
It can't answer the deepest questions, actually.
That the only real solution is Jesus.
And the reason, it's really simple.
Politics at its core is a process of critiquing other people and getting them to change.
Christianity, the gospel message, the message of Jesus, begins with repentance.
Christianity calls upon you to change.
Our core prayer given to us by Jesus, the Lord's prayer, how long is this?
Demands that we forgive other people, but preceding that is a request for our forgiveness.
In other words, forgive us our sins, meditate on what we've done wrong, how we've fallen short, and then it becomes possible to forgive other people.
That is a call to change our hearts from Jesus, and that is the only way forward.
Anyways, you guys, before I get to some of your comments, by the way, I think I went off air on Friday and didn't read comments from last week.
So I'm going to read some of those and then get into this.
Obviously, you guys already know.
Send me tips at cannisowens.com if you have any more information that you'd like to share with me.
First, I want to tell you guys about Nimi skincare because I know a lot of you guys ask me what I use to keep my skin looking healthy and glowing.
And the answer is simple.
It is Nimi Skincare.
It's a part of my daily routine, also my nightly routine.
If your skin is starting to show signs of aging, like fine lines creeping in, your skin is starting to sag a bit, or it's tired or uneven, or you feel like you're just kind of losing that youthful glow, then you should definitely try Nimi's anti-aging skincare line.
Their products have worked wonders on me.
Nimi's three-step anti-aging routine is packed with powerful, clinically backed ingredients that work.
This routine restores your skin barrier.
It boosts collagen production.
It reduces fine lines and wrinkles.
It locks in moisture and brightens for a healthy glow.
And here's what I love the most.
Not only do the products deliver results, but Nimi is proudly American-made.
Every formula is crafted right here in the USA, rivaling the best Korean skincare brands in quality while staying true to our values of faith, family, and freedom.
Right now, Nimi is giving my listeners 15% off your order if you use the code Candice15 at checkout.
But this offer ends soon.
So do not wait.
Go to NimiSkincare.com today, stock up on the three-step anti-aging routine and see the results for yourself.
Support a brand that shares our values and take care of your skin at the same time.
Visit NimiSkincare.com and use code Candice15.
Also remind you guys about American Financing because the cost of everything is still out of control.
Many of us are relying on credit cards to cover essentials.
If that debt is piling up, then you are not alone.
Americans collectively owe over $1 trillion in credit card debt.
You might have considered reaching out to my friends at American Financing, but maybe hesitated to do so because you don't want to give up your low mortgage rate.
Well, there's good news.
They've created the Smart Equity Loan, which is a solution designed to help you take control of your finances without touching your current mortgage.
Unlike a HELOC, which can have varied interest rates, the Smart Equity Loan offers fixed rate, which means one predictable monthly payment, giving you peace of mind.
This loan allows you to leverage the equity in your home to pay off high interest debt, free up your cash flow, and keep your existing low mortgage rate intact.
Manuela Palaccio writes, Candace, is Jack Pesobiac trustworthy?
I find it odd that a Navy intelligence officer, that the people closest to you betray you often for their own interests.
It happened to Jesus.
Also, the children that spoke yesterday, she is referring to the children who witnessed the assassination of Charlie Kirk and spoke out about that on the news the next morning on Good Mornings America.
Also, the children that spoke yesterday sounded highly rehearsed on their quote-unquote experience.
Okay, so to the first portion, I can tell you that I know Jack Posobic.
He has always been very solid with me.
I mean, always.
And Jack Pisobic, by the way, every single time that I have been attacked publicly, particularly over the declaration that Christ is king, it's like a trigger for Jack Pisobic.
He goes hard in the paint.
If you say you can't say Christ is king, Jack Posobic wants to go to war immediately, him and his brother.
And that's great.
So he's like a crusader.
And if he was part of some intelligence program that was not allowing any critique of Zionism or whatever it is, he would have definitely made an enemy of me pretty early on.
People, you know, really went masked down when I said Christ is king.
We can call and we'll create a firestorm so you won't be able to hit the stage at AmFest.
People can see that and they don't like that behavior.
So when you do that and then also say that you're the good guys, it doesn't ring true.
Now, they definitively have lost the most because clearly people did not buy BB's BS and people, the fact that people immediately thought that, and I wasn't the person who said this, but immediately thought that Israel was suspicious really shows you that they have lost all goodwill with the American people.
And that's, again, because of what they're doing, their actions in Gaza.
So I would agree with you that they've lost a lot since losing Charlie because he was kind of the last person who said, I am pro-Israel.
And he actually was somebody who had a presence across all of these universities.
And now, you know, we'll see what happens with the direction that turning point takes.
But I would say that the students are going to be very reticent to support Israel.
Bree writes, how did the rifle get from the roof to the woods?
Please help make, please help this make sense.
Grateful for you, Candace.
Keep up the great work.
Bree, again, that's from last week.
Nobody knows, but I would like to see the tunnel network.
I don't know how you do that.
There's probably some radar you can buy to see where the tunnels are.
If you're just a student on the campus, if it's legal, obviously I have no idea if it's legal.
I've watched all your videos, been meaning to ask you.
I just haven't been able to catch you live.
I didn't know that.
I did not know that you don't even use a screwdriver to take that apart.
There, look, they're doing their best, okay?
They're doing their best to come up with a story that works, and none of them do.
Whitney writes, something about Dr. Frank Turek isn't sitting right with me.
Unsure if he's having some unfounded guilt about not doing more and that's making him seem suspicious or whatnot, but I cannot shake the unsettling feeling in my gut regarding him.
God bless and protect you.
Yeah, I mean, I thought his speech was not the direction that I would have gone on had I have been invited to speak.
I am not saying, yeah, to like he's guilty about something, but I am saying that like a lot of people had that feeling having watched his speech.
And of course, I think he was a Marine in the past before, I don't know.
I really don't know what to say about that.
He gave the speech that he wanted to give, and nothing in my research has come up about thus far has come up about Frank Turek.
So I'm just reading your comment there wasn't the direction, again, that I would have taken.
But I wasn't invited to speak.
And as the Daily Mail pointed out, I raged and raged about that.
I freaked out and threw everything, threw my toys out of the pram.
Payne Revere writes, why didn't the local police department treat it like it was a crime scene?
So I'm happy she's going to speak about the rumors that BB Net and Yahoo offered him a boatload of money.
I didn't say $150 million was offered because I don't know the exact amount BB offered him.
I said $150 million.
I was told BB gave for Operation Mocking Pastor.
Remember when everybody, when all the pastors one weekend got up on stage and were like, Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens?
That is what I was told.
That was $150 million went into that.
And, but I definitively made the statement that BB Net and Yahoo offered Charlie Kirk a boatload of money and he rejected it.
So she will respond to that.
I said that Catholics were excited, hopeful about Charlie.
I don't know why that caused so much people to be up, people to be upset.
Like, what is wrong?
We are Christians.
We should be, no matter what, defending one another.
He obviously didn't convert, but also the nastiness towards Catholics just needs to stop, point blank.
I mean, Erica Kirk was raising a Catholic family.
So that was a strange thing to have people react so crazy.
I don't lie because I always know that eventually daylight comes in and things get exposed.
And so I'm excited to hear her speak about the pressure that he was under, as was alluded to by Alex Clark to speak about whether or not he was offered more money, whether he lost money, which he did.
I was told that individual was Bob Schulman, as I said last week, that took away millions of dollars from Turning Point, wanted his name taken off the building, and then changed his mind, did a 180 when Charlie died.
I mean, there was more than just him, obviously, but he was getting pressure from donors.
I mean, I think he said it on a show.
So yeah, that is daylight is always the best disinfectant.
Anyways, you guys, thank you for all the support.
We're going to have an incredible week.
More stuff to reveal to you.
If you want to support the show, if you want to go to prison, you can go to cannonisewens.com and buy a CIA parody shirt because you're going with me.
I'm not going alone.
I'll do it.
I'll do hood rat stuff, but I want to do it with my friends.
So if you buy it, then I'm going to report you to Laura Loomer, who will report you to the CIA.