All Episodes
Feb. 15, 2024 - Candace Owens
34:57
THIS Is Why Black Women Don't Like Taylor Swift...
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Happy Thursday, everybody.
Very happy to say that today we are recording for my new set.
I hope you guys like it.
What are we discussing on today's show?
Well, the internet was very surprised to learn yesterday that black women do not like Taylor Swift.
That arrived as some very shocking news to a lot of people.
I'm going to explain to you why that is.
Plus, later on in the show, the internet is also very divided after learning that a Florida private Christian school expelled two of its students after their mother advertised her OnlyFans page on her car.
Should they have expelled those students?
Yes?
No?
What do you guys think?
All that and more today coming up on Candace Owens.
So, you know, we do this thing at The Daily Wire, which is called Backstage Live, where
me and all the other hosts sit down and we just talk about various subjects, things that
are going on in the news, things that are going on culturally.
And a clip from Backstage went viral when it got to the discussion regarding Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's romance.
And what was really interesting, I mean, it really accumulated about 5 million views in less than 24 hours.
What was interesting is the way the internet responded to the clip.
There was a very clear racial divide.
A lot of, of course, Swifties, as they call themselves, were very upset.
Younger white women, no, she's our queen!
But black women were like, no, yes, Taylor Swift is very toxic.
So before we get into why black women feel that way, I'll at first let you guys listen to that clip from backstage.
Take a listen.
Obviously, if you've seen what she's even done in business and how she tries to manipulate her audiences, like, to get out of, like, deals and contracts, like, she's totally insane.
Like, she's the most toxic feminist that's ever existed.
And what she does is, basically, the threat is that if she doesn't get what she wants, she writes a song about a guy and then has 15 million girls singing the songs and drops little clues so they know who it's about.
I mean, it's totally psychotic, if you really think about it.
I don't think you appreciate how psychotic that is that you can't date her for two weeks Without her writing a song about you.
I mean, what she did to John Mayer as well.
John Mayer, yeah.
It was like, I literally did nothing to her.
Like, we went on one date and I didn't deserve this.
You're a rooney.
And then there's a bunch of, like, ten-year-old girls whose brains are not developed who then go and attack whoever it is.
Like, Scooter Braun's family, his young kids, literally had to go into hiding and get security because Taylor Swift wanted out of the deal that he legally purchased her catalog of music.
Yeah.
And she wrote this, you have to go find it on Tumblr, this like glorious rephrasing of basically like, my dad signed a contract, a legally binding contract for me when I was 15.
He now has the catalog because he purchased it.
And she was just like, you know, as a woman, I sat on the floor and I wrote these songs.
And then they tried to kill Scooter Braun's family.
And he did nothing wrong.
So yes, as I said, this clip went absolutely viral and when it hit Instagram, a lot of the comments revealed that black women very much agree with my assessment.
I'll just read a couple of these comments here.
Tickle Pink wrote, Basically, she's saying she plays a Karen very well.
This user wrote, I mean, she's not wrong. We all know this, lol. But yeah, she's an amazing artist
and all, but I def understand where Candace is coming from.
She basically plays a Karen pretty well, and there's plenty of girls with those ways, which is
toxic, LMFAO. And by the way, this is something that has been well understood all across
black America. I'll also let you watch this clip when a newscaster asked somebody their opinion
about Taylor Swift recently. Take a listen.
Taylor Swift uses feminism to tell people they can't be mean to her instead of using it for its
actual purpose. I don't know. I don't know. It's just like, the people she dates are like,
I don't know. I just feel like it's not giving, like she's using it for quite the right reasons.
Cloudy?
Yeah, just like the whole Mattie Healy thing, and then I spy, so it was just like, it wasn't giving.
Yeah.
Very interesting.
A couple of things.
She mentions Ice Spice.
We'll get to that.
But she also says Taylor Swift uses feminism so that people can't be mean to her.
And yeah, that's very true.
Let's start with Scooter Braun, who I mentioned on that clip.
Scooter Braun manages a ton of artists.
He owns his own label, his own holdings companies, and he keeps purchasing more record labels under that holding company.
Let's back up and talk about who Taylor Swift is, because she's not exactly your typical artist who really had to break the bank to make it.
I always say this, but if Taylor Swift wasn't one of the most famous people in the world, she would have had to settle with just being a rich girl.
Yeah, her father was a stockbroker for Merrill Lynch.
Her mom was a mutual fund marketing executive.
So they had a lot of experience, and they very much understood finance.
That's what I want you to take away from that.
They understood finance.
So in 2004, right shortly before 2004, they moved the entire family down to Nashville, and her father decided that he was going to work for Merrill Lynch in Nashville.
And then in 2004, Taylor Swift met Scott Borchetta.
Who was just starting his record label, which was called Big Machine.
And Taylor Swift was one of its first signings.
Big Machine signed Taylor Swift and took a chance on her, having no idea how big she was going to be.
But her father obviously sat down with a team of lawyers because he was a stockbroker.
And he decided that he was also going to purchase 3% of that company.
So her father became a partial owner of the company in which Taylor Swift was signed to.
A very good deal.
Very good deal.
Especially if you don't think your daughter's going to be the biggest pop star in the entire world.
The thing is, he agreed to the terms.
Years later, they decided to sell that company.
There was only five owners of that company, one of which was Scott Swift, Taylor Swift's father.
And they said, we're going to sell this.
And Scooter Braun was interested in buying it.
And he did purchase it.
So it was rather shocking—or it should have been shocking if you weren't, you know, a 15-year-old, pre-bubescent girl who follows Taylor Swift and doesn't understand business—when Taylor took to Tumblr and said she had no idea that her catalog of music, her masters, was being sold.
What do you mean you have no idea?
She wrote this in part.
For years I asked, pleaded for a chance to own my work.
Music I wrote on my bedroom floor and videos I dreamed up and paid for from the money I earned playing in bars, then clubs and arenas, then stadiums.
Some fun facts about today's news.
I learned about Scooter Braun's purchase of my Masters as it was announced to the world.
All I could think about was the incessant manipulative bullying I've received at his hands for years.
Like when Kim Kardashian orchestrated an illegally recorded snippet of a phone call to be leaked.
And then Scooter got two of his clients together to bully me online about it.
This is my worst case scenario.
When I left my masters in Scott Borchetta's hands, I made peace with the fact that eventually he would sell them.
Never in my worst nightmares did I imagine the buyer would be Scooter.
That's incredibly manipulative.
Again, at this time, Taylor Swift is, what, 32 years old?
A 32-year-old woman manipulating her fan base, using all the right buzzword, I dreamed up on my floor, I wrote these songs, blah, blah, blah, missing from this.
Of course, because it's meant to send her fans into attack mode, is the fact that her dad was a partial owner of the company.
Yes, Scott Swift made $15 million from the sale of that catalog, but never mentioned her dad, which you would have to be, like I said, have a very low business acumen.
To believe that Scott Swift, who is one of five owners of this company, was not aware of the sale.
And of course, Scooter Braun said this.
Scott Borgetta came out and said this.
They said, no, she was very much aware.
She was offered a chance to buy it, but it didn't matter because the purpose of her writing that post was for the young fans to attack and threaten to kill Scooter Braun.
She knows that's how her fans are, and that's exactly what they did.
In fact, Scooter Braun pleaded with her to stop doing this because his three young children's lives were being threatened by her fan base.
He wrote publicly, I assume this was not your intention, but it is important that you understand
that your words carry a tremendous amount of weight and that your message can be interpreted
by some in different ways.
He also made it clear to her that he wanted to rectify the situation, that he was open
to all possibilities in this public letter that he wrote to her, pleading for a resolution.
But he admitted in that letter that many people had told him that it was unlikely that he
and Taylor would ever meet face to face because she's much more interested in creating her
own narrative.
Essentially, he was being told that she is manipulative.
Scott Borchetta, by the way, the person who owned the company with her father and agreed to sell the company, her catalog rather, with Scott Swift, her father, openly said that the singer was being misleading about the
situation and he claimed that she very much had an opportunity to buy her own catalog.
Like I said, it didn't matter.
And she never rectified the situation.
And her fans to this day threaten Scooter Braun and his family because they think that
she was used.
That is toxic femininity.
That is why I say that what we're living right now is in a matriarchy and it's a bunch of
women pretending that women are the victims when in fact they yield a ton of power.
So why would she do something like that to Scooter Braun?
Well because if you learn anything about Taylor Swift, she likes to use her fan base to right
perceived wrongs.
In one situation that she held onto for a very long time, which she mentioned in that post, which is probably the biggest contributor to why black Americans do not like Taylor Swift, was related to a situation pertaining to Kanye West and Kim Kardashian.
So I'm going to ask you guys to park aside your feelings about Kanye West.
It doesn't actually matter.
I want you to objectively look at this situation.
Kanye West dropped a song, and the song was entitled Famous.
The first lines of the song were, to all my south side n-words that know me best, I feel like me and Taylor might still have sex.
Why?
I made that B-I-T-C-H famous.
I made that B-I-T-C-H famous.
So when her fans, her Swifties, got wind of these lyrics, they freaked out.
They were like, oh my god, this is so wrong.
This is awful.
How dare he say this about Taylor Swift?
This is disgusting.
This is despicable.
This should never be allowed.
It's misogyny.
Remember, her brand is feminism, so of course these lines are not OK.
And then Kanye West wanted to calm them down.
They came out and they said, oh, I called.
I called Taylor Swift about this line.
It's all good, guys.
Stop freaking out.
And they looked at her and said, oh my gosh, Taylor Swift, did you say this was okay?
The Swifties were like, oh no, how could you say this?
And so Taylor Swift had her rep issue a statement, and the statement read, Kanye did not call for approval, but to ask Taylor to release his single Famous on her Twitter account.
She declined and cautioned him about releasing a song with such a strong, misogynistic message.
Taylor was never made aware of the actual lyric, I made that bitch famous.
Wow.
When I read that statement to you, what did you get from it?
Well, you obviously got that Kanye lied, they had a conversation about the song, and she said to him, in very strong terms, obviously, no, this is very misogynistic.
Do not, do not release this song.
Except that's not what happened.
It's clearly not what happened.
You're going to be shocked.
I want you to really listen to this, because it's one of the reasons I will never like Taylor Swift, and why Black America will never like Taylor Swift, because that was a manipulative rep statement that she released.
Unbeknownst to her, Kanye West had cameras on him at the time that they had the conversation, and his then-wife, Kim Kardashian, released the phone call.
Listen to the conversation.
Well, the reason why it will be happening is because it has a very controversial line at the beginning of the song about you.
What does it say?
Wait a second, you sound sad.
Well, is it gonna be mean?
No, I don't think it's mean.
Okay, then let me hear it.
So it says, To all my south side n****s that know me best, I feel like Taylor Swift might owe me sex.
That's not mean.
Okay.
Yeah.
Because we tried to make it nicer.
So I said, as far as my south side n****s that know me best, I feel like me and Taylor might still have sex.
And my wife was really not with that one.
She was way more into the, she owes you sex.
But then the oh, the oh part was like the feminist group type that I was like, ah, Yeah.
Well, what I give a f**k about is just you as a person and as a friend.
I want things that make you feel good.
I don't want to do rap that makes people feel bad.
But I mean, you don't give a f**k, so...
Yeah, basically.
Well, what I give a f**k about is just you as a person and as a friend.
I want things that make you feel good.
I don't want to do rap that makes people feel bad.
Okay, now what if later in the song, I was also to have said, uh, I made her famous?
It's a good thing.
Is that a... Did she say that?
Yes, it might have happened.
Well, what am I going to do about it?
Like, do the hair flip?
Yeah, I mean, um, it's just kind of like whatever at this point.
You've got to tell a story the way that it happened to you and the way that you experienced it.
Like, you honestly didn't know who I was before that.
Like, it doesn't matter if I sold 7 million of that album before you did that, which is what happened.
You didn't know who I was before that. It's fine.
But, um, yeah. I can't wait to hear it.
So there you have the conversation.
And by the way, you can pursue it in its entirety.
I'm not trying to cut it down to make her look bad whatsoever.
What comes across, actually, as you hear it, is that he brings up feminism to her and says, I was going to make this line that you owe me sex, but then I was sort of like, hmm, what are the feminists going to say?
And then she agrees and says, yeah, the feminists won't like that.
So he changes the line to me and Taylor might still have sex and tells her that he cares about her feelings in all of this.
He was being very Careful not to upset her as a person, he says.
And yet, you didn't get that, of course, from her statement that she released through her rep, because she wasn't expecting her fans to be so angry about the line.
So she just flipped on him.
Flipped on him publicly.
And then when those phone calls were leaked, it made her look very bad, and she held on to that anger.
Held on to that anger for so long that she then did something horrific To Scooter Braun to right that perceived wrong, right?
Oh my God, now people are seeing that I'm actually quite manipulative and I'm gonna get even with Scooter Braun because Scooter Braun at that time, when that song was released, was Kanye's manager.
That is how she works.
That is how she operates.
There have been many men that have come out and said things like this.
Calvin Harris talked about Taylor Swift using the media to her benefit when they broke out and leaking the fact that her vocals were used on a song which they had agreed to keep private.
Katy Perry came out and said that she was a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Notoriously, many artists have been trying to communicate that the way that she behaves publicly and privately is very different.
And what I refer to all of this as is toxic feminism, right?
She's pretending to be a feminist, but in reality, she is just business savvy, and she's also someone that knows that if you hurt her, she can send an entire hive of young girls to attack you.
So that's the answer.
There's never going to be a time in American history where black women get on board with Taylor Swift, because being Taylor Swift means never having to say that you're sorry, never having to say that you're wrong, but instead manipulating a young fan base to believe that no matter what happened, you were the victim.
I'm not young.
I'm the same age as you, Taylor Swift.
You're going to be 35 this year.
I think it's time to grow up and let go of that narrative.
And that's all I'm going to say about that.
If you're like most Americans, you're struggling to make ends meet.
Everything is more expensive these days.
By the time you pay the bills, fill up your car, and go grocery shopping, there's almost nothing left.
You're laying out your credit card for all non-essentials, or maybe even some essentials.
Last I checked, the average credit card interest rate for Americans is sitting at 24%.
That is insane.
How are you supposed to dig yourself out of all that debt?
If you own a home, I want you to call my friends at American Financing right now.
Interest rates have finally dropped into the fives, which is the lowest they've been in a long time.
So call American Financing to talk about their refinance options.
They save their customers on average $854 a month by tapping into their home equity and wiping out high-interest credit card debt.
Think about it.
$854 a month is like a $10,000 raise.
What a relief that could be for you and your family.
Do not wait to take control of your finances.
These rates might not last long, so act today.
Call American Financing at 800-795-1210.
And if you call today, you may not have to make next month's mortgage payment.
That's 800-795-1210.
That's 800-795-1210 or visit AmericanFinancing.net.
Enter NMLS ID NMLS186.
APR for rates in the 5 start at 6.406% for well-qualified borrowers.
Call 800-795-1210 for details about credit costs and terms.
and the fives start at 6.406% for well-qualified borrowers.
Call 800-795-1210 for details about credit costs and terms.
Okay, now it's time for some Topics du Jour.
♪♪ So, really interesting story coming out of Florida.
Basically, a mom enrolled her children into a Christian school, and now both of her sons have been expelled from that Christian school because she decided to put an OnlyFans decal on her car promoting her side job on OnlyFans, where she produces pornographic content.
Take a listen to her talking to a local news station about what happened.
This morning, controversy near Orlando after a Florida private school expelled two children over a dispute with their mother.
At issue?
A sticker on Michelle Klein's car, promoting her OnlyFans page.
It's definitely linked to, you know, explicit content, adult content for sure.
My husband and I have this, you know, little wild, you know, behind closed doors lifestyle that we've now decided to share.
Only Fans is an online platform often used by adult content creators to monetize photos and videos.
Other parents at Liberty Christian Preparatory School are not fans of promoting that site.
That's a distraction to my children.
And no matter how poorly or how good I parent, Porn is there.
At first, the school asked Klein not to bring the car on campus unless the decal was removed, and urged her to drop her kids off across the street.
I was forced to have to take it off or not come on campus.
And then, the school sent a letter saying, your family's enrollment with LCPS is terminated.
Effective immediately.
So when you hear that story, obviously, it's clear that they gave her an opportunity to remove the decal and said, basically, this is not allowed on our Christian campus.
And she refused to because, I guess, she just wants to promote her pornography and she's not quite sure what the problem is.
And you can see why she's not quite sure, especially because, as we talk about on the show all the time, pornography is just something that we have grown to accept.
Softcore pornography everywhere, via advertisements, and it has become, honestly, something that is ruining our society.
Every layer of it.
You know, men are rendered weaker by pornography.
It has become an addiction for a lot of men.
It is ruining families.
It is ruining faith.
And yet we are seeing more and more this sort of an instance where people are trying to mainstream it, which is why the internet was divided on this.
Some people actually were coming to her defense, a lot of people, saying that it's not fair that they punished the children for the actions of their mother.
What would you expect this Christian school to do?
It's a Christian school.
I would imagine that they want to abide by, I don't know, Christianity.
Pornography will probably be problematic, which is why when the principal of the school was asked about this, his name is Jeremy Thomas, he said, yeah, no, we're pretty consistent here on what the teachings of the Bible are.
This is the quote that he gave the New York Post.
Pornography is a vice and a sexual sin that destroys lives and breaks up marriages.
So they are very happy to stand by the Bible.
And what I would say is, I can't imagine, you know, paying for my children to go to a private Christian school because you think there is so much sin in this world.
There is.
And maybe I can avoid some of that sin by Enrolling them into a school that focuses on the Bible.
By the way, that used to be all schools.
All schools used to teach the Bible, and I very much believe that society went into a steep decline when they removed the Bible from the classroom.
In public schools, when the Department of Education took over, they said, no more Bible teachings, right?
And so what has happened, obviously, is that our society has now embraced something to replace it.
All types of different things to replace it.
All types of different vices and sins.
So I can imagine being that parent who says, this is how I'm going to avoid it.
I'm going to enroll into private school.
I'm going to pay that extra money for this education.
Then you've just got a mom who's like, no, I want to promote OnlyFans.
I want to promote my site at this school.
Why?
What is wrong with you?
Are you a disturbed individual?
How difficult would it be for you not to promote your OnlyFans website while you are visiting or picking up your children every single day at school?
Is it that difficult?
No, well, apparently she makes over $20,000 a month on her X-rated career, so she just sees this as this is mommy's job.
I 100%, by the way, agree with that woman that you saw in the news clip.
They made the right decision.
They made the right decision because it's not about her two children, it's about all the rest of them.
It's about the expectations that the parents have when they enroll them into the academy, that they won't be exposed to any type of pornographic material.
Do I feel bad for her children?
Yes, I feel very bad for her children.
Not only because she has no shame, but because she's now doing the rounds in the media to talk about the fact that she does pornography.
So you can only imagine how their lives are going to be warped by what their mother
does.
A woman that just embraces pornography.
She has two sons.
As I said, pornography addiction, it is absolutely crippling for men.
So you can imagine that her sons will in the future be crippled by that addiction, crippled
by that normalization of pornography, and also so embarrassed, just so embarrassed if
that was your parent on the news acting so casually.
Imagine how they're going to be made fun of if they now have to enter public school, which I imagine might be the circumstance because you do have to get into private schools.
And you just have friends that can watch your mom, that can just pay monthly to watch your mom create porn for them.
Absolutely sickening.
Parents have no shame, and they impact their young children.
And unfortunately for these young children, they are already seeing the consequences, having to face the consequences unfairly for their mother's actions.
But moving on, and I think actually it's still on topic, I have to draw to your attention Kristen Stewart on the cover of Rolling Stone.
So essentially my theory, which I discussed by the way on backstage the other night, is that we are living in a matriarchy.
Obviously.
And women are controlling a lot and pretending that they're suffering from men.
And this matriarchy tells women what to be.
And it's always everything but just a woman, right?
You are either going to be really disgusting and spread your legs apart and sell yourself to everybody on OnlyFans, right?
That's like the hoe philosophy.
Or they're telling women that you should be like men.
Really, and this is what the entire purpose of this Rolling Stone article is.
It's to make Kristen Stewart look like she's so brave, because really, she's just acting like a dude.
So this is the actual photo of the cover, and they're going, oh my God, conservatives are outraged.
It's Kristen Stewart.
Here she is.
She's wearing a leather vest and nothing else but underwear.
And yes, you are looking at her with her hands in her crotch area.
Yeah.
I don't even know if that registers to you as sexy.
We're not outraged.
We're just fundamentally disgusted.
I just want to be clear.
No one's outraged.
We're just disgusted with this obvious ploy to rinse women of femininity, right?
And that's what this is about.
Oh, this is punk rock.
This is cool.
Rolling Stone exists to define culture for the upcoming group of people, for young people to go, oh my god, she's so cool.
She's so cool.
And here's some more photos I'm going to show you.
Here she is again in her underwear.
She's wearing just a Nike shirt.
She looks like a guy that's just in the gym, maybe getting ready for the game.
Here's another photo of her from the shoot, legs open, wearing a t-shirt that says, eat me, you know, just kind of looking very gender fluid, which is how she describes herself in this article.
And I just wanted to, since I think my audience is now very aware of this sort of propaganda, I hope that any person that listens to this podcast is They are now training their mind to recognize propaganda everywhere that they see it.
I'm going to read you some quotations from the article which was written to accompany this cover, which, by the way, I'm going to have to park aside the death of the English language.
The person who's writing this article can barely speak English.
The first sentence is, Kristen Stewart is strong as F. And I do not mean this metaphorically.
What?
How do you have a job?
Literally, how are you writing?
How is this your literal job to write?
Strong as F. Anyways, let's get to some quotations.
She leans toward me.
Just to be clear, it's written in first person, so he's writing about his experience meeting with Kristen Stewart, this non-writer.
She leans toward me, legs wide and elbows on her knees.
We'll figure something out, she says.
So, you already get this picture of her being a dude, right?
She leans forward, she's got her legs really wide, her elbows on her knees, and he just keeps talking about how she's drinking and she's super cool.
She takes a swig of beer and leans back into the sofa.
I never have felt like I have performed a femininity in order to reap its benefits in the way that felt like a lie, she continues.
I'm very fluid, and I've never felt like, oh wow, I was doing this lie for a long time in order to get jobs.
So, yeah, there you have it.
She's basically right there up front telling you, like, and he's trying to describe this, you know, she's embracing this masculinity.
She's fluid.
She's telling you that there's nothing wrong with not being feminine whatsoever because, as I said, this is the cultural conditioning that's happening right now.
They're also talking about—and the purpose of this cover story is that she has a movie that's coming out, and she's playing somebody who she describes as dyke-y, right?
That's a word that if I had said that myself from YouTube, and I wasn't a lesbian like Kristen Stewart is, they probably would have hit it.
But I guess lesbians are embracing this word, and she says, It was really effing fun to be allowed to have the little dykey sister be the main protagonist in a movie.
That's never the main character in a movie.
That's never the one that you want to eff.
I mean, that's the one some people do, but not the one that you are prescribed to want to eff.
Oh, so raunchy.
This is just such a classy interview.
And then it goes on and he's describing what's happening, just with him dealing with her.
And again, we're back to this beer narrative.
He writes, a few minutes later, she wanders off again.
She just keeps walking away from me, she narrates in my perspective, and returns from the biohazard fridge with two Coors lights.
You can have a beer if you want, she announces.
I'm going to have one.
Ooh, cool.
Oh my god.
Now girls are going to look at this and be like, oh, it's so cool.
The dikey little sister is now the protagonist, which means they want, if this is what's coming down the pipeline in Hollywood, they want women to embrace this, this sort of protagonist role in their own life.
It's cool to be the dikey little sister, as she writes.
Swigging beer with your legs open and your hand in your crotch like a dude.
And we're supposed to perceive this as, oh my gosh, yay, women are finally free from the goal of having to be women.
Oh my gosh, no, this is not freedom.
This is enslavement.
This is cultural enslavement by telling women that every natural proclivity that they have is wrong.
By telling women that everything that shouts at them biologically, wanting to aspire to be beautiful, wanting to meet a prince in your life, wanting to get married and to have children, is wrong.
Which is so funny because at the same time they want to convince you that the patriarchy is all around us, that in order to escape the patriarchy you have to in many ways escape yourself.
And it's so evident that that just simply isn't the circumstance whatsoever because they routinely dismiss women and give them names for embracing a traditional lifestyle.
The only women in this society that are oppressed or are treated horribly by the media are the women that are actually happy, right?
And nothing about Kristen Stewart's life and anything that she put into this article reads to me as somebody that is happy and somebody that is secure.
It reads to me like someone who is trying very hard to continually be subversive.
And it's just simply not necessary.
So I hope that people recognize this, that these two extremes that we're constantly being
told that women have to be, like you have to be overtly sexy and constantly trying to
get attention and being naked, or you have to just rinse yourself with femininity altogether
and be a man.
And I am existing to tell women that, no, actually, just live your life, be normal,
It is so cool to simply be normal.
Stop telling them that you have to abnormalize everything.
And you'll find that when you live a normal life, when you live a life that, in my view, should be Christ-centered, that you will be so much happier than these people that they're trying to convince you are happy.
Balance of Nature fruits and veggies are the most convenient way to get whole food ingredients every day.
Balance of Nature uses an advanced cold vacuum process that encapsulates fruits and vegetables into whole food supplements without sacrificing their natural antioxidants.
The capsules are completely void of additives, fillers, extracts, synthetics, pesticides, or added sugar.
The only thing that's in Balance of Nature's fruit and veggie capsules are fruits and veggies.
Right now, my listeners will get 35% off their first preferred order and a free fiber and spice supplement.
Balance of Nature's fiber and spice supplement is a revolutionary fiber drink with a unique blend of 12 spices and whole foods.
There has never been an easier way to make sure that you're getting your daily dose of fruits and vegetables.
Experience Balance of Nature for yourself today.
Go to balanceofnature.com and use promo code Candice for 35% off your first order as a preferred customer, plus get a free bottle of fiber and spice.
That's balanceofnature.com promo code Candice for 35% off your first preferred order, plus a free bottle of fiber and spice.
Alright guys, now it's time to read some of your comments regarding episodes past.
First set of comments pertaining to yesterday's episode, which was just basically my message to my Jewish
and my Muslim fans and to all of the world, that I reserve the right to be a Christian
and being a Christian woman means I am allowed to mourn children dying when they have bombs dropped on
them or they are assassinated by terrorists.
Doesn't matter to me whether they're Israeli or Palestinian, I just got really tired
of that peer pressure to feel like you have to be on a side of that.
I don't play politics when it comes to my humanity.
I have Jewish and I have Muslim friends.
This person writes, I am a 76 year old Jewish man and think your values and commentaries are spot on
You are a brave woman.
And yes, I was very happy.
So many Jewish people reached out to me on Instagram and just said, thank you for saying this.
Like, this is my perspective, too.
And I think things have become very political and have been misrepresenting how we all feel about this, which is just that it's sad.
Mina writes, Thank you Candice for giving the whole story.
Seeing all those children die in such grotesque ways makes me sick.
I am very pro-life and I hate that when I show my sadness for the deaths of innocent children in Gaza, I am called anti-Semitic.
I love all children and all children are innocent no matter what religious background they are from.
Amen.
From your Christian sister, Amen.
Regarding Rachel Dolezal, I have said that I am a Stan.
Thank you, by the way, Internet, for correcting me and telling me that Stan does not mean a stalker fan.
It actually is from Eminem's song, Stan, which I actually knew, which was about a crazed stalker fan.
So, thank you.
I told you I'm not hip.
I'm just trying to learn the new slang, but I was very much familiar with Eminem's song, Stan.
I have said I'm a Rachel Dollazal stan, and I'm obviously being facetious, but I do think she was just ahead of her time on The Crazy.
KBC writes, You gotta give credit where credit is due.
Rachel was way ahead of many of us in understanding the power of identity politics
and intersectionality and where that grip could get people.
She just played her cards too hard, too early.
I think she could have leveraged it a bit longer if she had played the long game.
Yes, we're like five minutes away from transracial.
We are five minutes away from people darkening their skin and saying they're black, or lightening their skin and saying that they're white, doing whatever, going under procedures and saying that they're Chinese.
I just don't see how that's problematic in today's society where you can pick your species.
Constantino writes, she lost her teaching job.
Poor thing.
I think she should skip the country for a new start.
Yes, this broke in the news after yesterday's episode that she lost her teaching job.
Shocking to me.
Man, I feel that she is a victim, and I am here to help her.
Robert writes in conclusion, Well, we showed you the before and after picture, man.
She kinked up her hair a little bit, probably said she was mixed.
I mean, with all that dark makeup and her hair kinked, she definitely could have sold herself as half black and half white.
And look, she was passionate about the issue.
She was like, we got to deal with this racism.
Me and my people are suffering.
We are locked down in the struggle.
She probably did a couple of fist bumps and Black America was here for it.
Ladies and gentlemen, unfortunately, that is all the time that we have for today.
Export Selection