So obviously, when the BLM riots took place, and those of us who were willing to simply tell the truth about what was going to happen, once you encourage criminality in inner cities, this isn't something new.
It's happened before.
With the 60s riots, we know the outcome.
Business owners essentially get up and they leave.
But what was particularly odd about the BLM riots is that Corporations were encouraging it.
They're like, this is your right, Black America.
You can steal, you can rob, you can do whatever you want because of previous injustices that you did not face in this country in the form of slavery.
So once that became the settled narrative, obviously what was going to happen is what happened during the 1960s.
If you're just going to riots, there is no incentive for business owners to stay in your community.
So they're going to leave.
Obviously, they're going to leave because they're being robbed.
They're losing billions of dollars, major corporations, because of the theft and the looting that's taken place in the past, but now it's just outward theft that's happening, particularly across stores like CVS, Walgreens.
Democratic Rep.
Ayanna Pressley has never been accused of being bright, but this is exceptional.
It is exceptional what she is doing here.
She is condemning Walgreens for quote-unquote racial and economic discrimination because they made the business-wise decision to close their doors in Boston after losing a ton of money because they were being robbed.
Take a listen to what she had to say, addressing the House about this discrimination.
Mr. Speaker, Walgreens is planning to close yet another pharmacy in the Massachusetts 7th, this time on Warren Street in Roxbury, a community that is 85% black and Latino.
This closure is a part of a larger trend of abandoning low-income communities like the previous closures in Mattapan and Hyde Park, both in the Massachusetts 7th.
When a Walgreens leaves a neighborhood, they disrupt the entire community and they take with them baby formula, diapers, asthma inhalers, life-saving medications, and of course, jobs.
These closures are not arbitrary and they are not innocent.
They are life-threatening acts of racial and economic discrimination.
That is why I joined with Senator Markey and Warren to demand answers from Walgreens' CEO.
Why was there no community input, no adequate notice to customers, and no transition resources to prevent gaps in healthcare?
Shame on you, Walgreens!
Having a website with talking points about health equity and underserved communities is not enough.
Walgreens is a multi-billion dollar corporation that needs to put their money where their mouth is and stop divesting from black and brown communities.
I think what's really amazing to me about that clip is that she says it with some hair on her chest, you know?
She's like, I know that what I'm saying makes sense, and what makes sense is that even if the black and Latino community is robbing you every single day, okay?
And you cannot make any money, okay?
Then you need to still be investing in our community, which means just by selling stuff that we are not gonna buy because we're going to rob it, okay?
It's racist.
Like, she's actually very sure of herself.
In this utterly stupid analysis condemning a business for moving out and saying that, okay, well, what's going to happen if we can't have access to diapers?
Well, you should have thought about that before you were robbing the diapers from their store, before you were robbing the food from their store.
A business exists to make money.
I know that seems like really basic information.
I don't know.
In this particular climate, there are a lot of people who don't actually know that.
Businesses exist to make money.
Charities, perhaps, if you want to establish a charity.
If Walgreens was a charity and they just were giving people diapers and maybe you could say something like, hey, this is why you exist.
This is why people are giving you free money.
It's not that.
And she doesn't understand that, which brings to, I guess, A larger question.
How is it plausible that these sorts of individuals who can't think, who are so illogical, keep making it to D.C.?
That's my question.
How are we supposed to get better as a society, as a culture, when we are not sending the brightest people to D.C.?
The answer is we can't.
Right?
If the collective IQ is this low, if this person actually got elected to represent people's interests, and yet she doesn't understand a basic business concept, how do we get better?
How do things go up in our society?
I don't know.
I don't mean to be depressing, but when I see something like that, I'm just like, wow, what is happening?
Obviously, the education system has failed Ayanna Pressley, and instead she's just performative, and people just want actors and actresses to head over to D.C.
And it's not looking good for us guys at all.
But at least you guys don't feel too down because, as I said at the beginning of the show, the groundhog did not see his shadow.
So we are going to get a nice, long, amazing spring.
So things are looking up in that regard.
Alright guys, now let's jump into some of your comments regarding episodes past.
Fittingly, regarding Ice Cube and the clip that we shared with Bill Maher talking about the music industry being intentionally corrupt.
RA Pictures writes, The thing about music is that it has the ability to alter mood.
So a lot of times, when a song is created, the artist doesn't have a clue that it's a hit record.
There are countless recording artists who are functioning illiterate and are able to create chart-topping hit songs.
So when a song breaks, whoever holds the promotional or marketing power is king.
That is correct, and that is why I wanted to call out today who's distributing this music.
Because you're making her into a star.
You're doing it artificially.
You're hearing this music.
You know it's bad, but you know that you're a kingmaker.
You can just pretend it's good, get it more plays, and then make it a hit record.
Coach Keith writes, It's one thing to allow filthy music to be made, but it's
another thing to, one, only reward the artists that create filthy music, and two,
promote it over other music.
It is deliberate.
Of course, that brings us to think about the Grammys, right?
When they're making these decisions of who can even perform at the Grammys as we've covered.
Why would you allow this individual to perform at the Grammys?
Blink and Sexy Red will be on the Grammy stage.
Blink and Sexy Red will be given a Grammy.
And you're going to say, how did this happen?
And the answer, of course, is that it is very much intentional.
Peezy the director writes, the music industry is not about music.
It's about power and influence.
It's a power industry.
Awards shows are private entities funded by the labels to promote their product to the masses who believe it is some governmental court of law to determine what is good music.
That is very correct and that is why I will forever believe that Hollywood was created as an arm of the CIA, an arm of our government.
The CIA has always been interested in psychological experiments.
We've covered many of them on this show.
If you don't know about them, you should go pursue them.
I mean, at one point they were trying Just dosing random citizens with LSD.
They got very interested in understanding how to create a mind.
And then they recognized that when you can create a celebrity, all else follows.
And this is the reason why celebrities are dangerous.
Even if what they're doing is not bad, or what they're creating is not bad, they still can become tools of the government in the future.
And they only ever turn someone into a superstar if that individual is a leftist.
If that individual is in lockstep with the government, lockstep with whatever the CIA initiatives are, whether it is they want to go to war, whether it is that they want you to celebrate abortion, you cannot become a superstar.
You will not be on magazines.
You will not win a Grammy unless you agree with them and whatever it is that they are trying to create in our society or trying to uphold in our society.
Regarding E. Jean Carroll, the absolute basket case that we showed you guys yesterday,
Maddie J. Stone writes, The interview with Elizabeth Jean Carroll and Anderson
Cooper is insane.
My jaw dropped when she said that. He literally had to cut it to a commercial break because
everyone must have been thinking, what the hell is happening right now? How on earth did she win
Yes.
How on earth did she win it?
Because the courts are corrupt.
In certain states, it is really, really difficult to win based on sense, based on evidence, because they have made sure over a long time to also have judges.
My answer is no.
in their pocket. They know that you can go into New York and people are going to hate
Donald Trump. That is it. Donald Trump has now moved to Florida because of this very
reason. And like I said, it doesn't matter how you feel about Donald Trump. Do you want
to live in a country where the Department of Justice is this corrupt? My answer is no.
Evelyn writes, the whole Trump and Jean Carroll situation upsets me because there are women
who have been through more traumatic situations with evidence as well that will never even
see a third of what this woman received, even though they may deliberately need it. Meanwhile,
woman that can go on live TV and say rape is sex, he receives $85 million a
America is weird.
Nope, America is not weird.
America is corrupt at this moment, and we are fighting that corruption every single day.
And I do remain optimistic because I think that there has been a mass awakening, and that's why things are becoming even more radical, because there is this desperation to hold on to power when it's slipping.
This is the reason why, like we showed you earlier in the week, Taylor Ren's The mainstream media companies are all empty.
Journalists are getting fired.
They're getting laid off.
What's happening?
Well, people are realizing that it's all propaganda and it's all BS, and they are turning to different voices.