Ask Us Anything 244: What is Christian Zionism? American Revolution Books? O Canada?
The whole team takes an hour of questions live from CK Exclusives subscribers, including: -What books do they recommend about the founding of America? -What is Christian Zionism and why do people (including Charlie) believe it? -Are Amfest speakers picked yet? Become an Exclusives subscriber and ask the team a question on-air by going to members.charliekirk.com.Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
I run the largest pro-American student organization in the country fighting for the future of our republic.
My call is to fight evil and to proclaim truth.
If the most important thing for you is just feeling good, you're going to end up miserable.
But if the most important thing is doing good, you'll end up purposeful.
College is a scam, everybody.
You got to stop sending your kids to college.
You should get married as young as possible and have as many kids as possible.
Go start a Turning Point USA college chapter.
Go start a Turning Point USA high school chapter.
Go find out how your church can get involved.
Sign up and become an activist.
I gave my life to the Lord in fifth grade.
Most important decision I ever made in my life.
And I encourage you to do the same.
Here I am.
Lord Musemy.
Buckle up, everybody.
Here we go.
The Charlie Kirk Show is proudly sponsored by Preserve Gold, the leading gold and silver experts and the only precious metals company I recommend to my family, friends, and viewers.
If you want to join us at members.charlikirk.com, members.charlikirk.com, become a monthly supporter of the show and of the team, help keep the lights on.
And you also get a lot of great perks, one of which is you get to call in on Fridays and ask questions live on the show.
But first, we have a little bit of housekeeping because we have a very special guest that joined us.
And yet, you too, Tyler.
Tyler Boyer has joined us.
But you have brought a very special guest with us.
So why don't you introduce Tiffany for us?
Yeah, we have the head of everything political over at Heritage, Heritage Action.
So those of you that know Heritage Foundation, probably one of the longest standing brands within the conservative movement that was loved, beloved by President Reagan, that was beloved by Rush Limbaugh, that obviously is great partner.
They've had action for many, many years, but the new leader is Tiffany Justice, who is here with us on campus today.
And we're just working through all the things.
So welcome, Tiffany.
We're excited to have you on the Charlie Kirk show.
Tiffany is also famous for being the co-founder of Moms for Liberty, which you've SPLC's worst nightmare.
That's right.
Hate group.
Yeah, I hate to say it.
You got the hate group.
I'm the leader of the hate group.
You got the hate group.
Moms are so hateful when you don't clean your room.
That's right.
And you don't vacuum.
Eat your broccoli.
Yeah, you don't take out the trash.
You don't eat what you're supposed to.
But I don't think that's what the SPLC meant.
No, they messed with the wrong moms.
Yeah, that's right.
So she's the co-founder.
Tons of the brains.
And she was brought over to lead Heritage Action into really a new era.
I don't know if you just want to talk about that just for a second with Kevin Roberts, who's a brilliant Dr. Kevin Roberts.
He's a brilliant man over at Heritage.
We love him to death.
And Tiffany now, really muscle.
Yeah, really excited to join Heritage and to inspire by the work that you guys do at Turning Point Action, right?
A lot of federal lobbying that Heritage Action has done, some state lobbying that they've done since 2019, but really expanding the portfolio now and making sure that we're getting out the vote.
Americans want to be empowered to take our country back.
So excited to kind of emulate some of what Turning Point Action has done across the country at Heritage Action.
And that's what's really critical is everyone has to be focused on nothing will matter.
Nothing will get done if we don't get out the vote and actually win.
As we saw last Tuesday when we had some dramatic losses because not enough GO TV was done on our side in specific states where we don't necessarily operate full-time, but those are places that need a lot of help.
Yeah, blown away by the amount of money that Democrats spent in the House of Delegate Races in Virginia, like 68 million to Republicans 25.
So something has to change and Heritage Action is going to help to try to change it.
Wow.
And a lot of people, like on a very basic level, I think our audience would get this, but you know, if you're kind of a normie, you're just out there, you're not really political, understanding the difference between a C3 and like a C4, for example, Turning Point USA, C3.
So a lot of people will just say Turning Point USA, assuming that it covers all the bases.
But Turning Point Action is where we do our ballot chasing.
It's where we do our scorecards, where we endorse candidates.
It's completely different and separate from Turning Point USA.
Yeah, I mean, I would say about Heritage and Foundation in Action.
I think of the Heritage Foundation as like the chef that makes a beautiful meal, all these amazing policies that they write over at Heritage Foundation.
But if you don't have power, if you're not winning elections and that's how you get power, then you can't put any of the policies into place.
So they're really strategic partners.
Yep.
Power is everything.
Power is everything.
We have a first question.
I believe this is from Brandon.
Brandon, you are joining the Charlie Kirk Show.
Welcome.
Hey guys, can you hear me?
Yes, we can.
Thanks for joining.
What's your question?
Well, I'm back with another book question.
It's mainly for Blake, but I don't know if he's still on.
Yes, I'm here.
I'm here.
You got me.
You got me.
So my question is, what books or authors do you recommend to learn about the Revolutionary War and the period from 1776 to 1789?
So before we actually have a first president?
Alrighty.
Oh, man.
Well, so first of all, you should never discount the actual legit primary sources for that sort of thing.
So like it's actually worthwhile to go and read Thomas Jefferson.
Thomas Jefferson, he wrote a lot of letters.
He wrote notes on the state of Virginia.
Like you hear a lot of things about the founders, and yet they are real people.
They were engaged in war.
They were engaged in politics.
They had feuds with one another that are now like easily forgotten about.
And yet, like, that's the lives they lived.
You know, the Federalist Papers, of course, which were to ratify the Constitution, but there was letters they were writing beforehand.
So I always encourage that.
I also encourage knowing what went into the revolution.
I've advocated for Albion's seat on this show before.
That's kind of about the different groups of people who settled America in the colonial period from England.
They were very different groups, and they shaped America.
For the revolution itself, one that I liked, it came out around 1990, and it was the radicalism of the American Revolution.
And obviously, as conservatives, we like the revolution, yet we also have to admit it is like it was a very radical, it was a revolution.
It basically toppled a monarchical government.
It installed the first major kind of, you know, Charlie hates the word democracy, but we founded democratic-ish governments in a lot of these states.
And that hadn't been seen in the West for 2,000 years.
Hugely transformative event.
And there was stuff going on during the revolution where they were just, you know, you'd overthrow your royal governor and have this super radical state constitution, which now these constitutions would seem conservative to us if we still have them.
But for the time, hugely, hugely, I'm looking at my list here.
Radical documents.
Another thing, just for the war itself, Empire of Liberty was like, I think the either Oxford or Cambridge History of the United States, it's a whole big series.
But their book on the American Revolution is like a just decent one on the actual revolutionary period.
I think The Glorious Cause is also their book about the war itself.
That's solid.
If you're a big Tory, some people really like, there's like old, like extremely conservative books that argue the revolution was a mistake and the loyalists should have won.
I do not believe that.
I disavow.
And I can't remember them off the top of my head anyway, but I would be remiss if I if I left them out.
So I hope that helps a little bit.
Blake, can I add in too?
I think one of the things, and we talk about this all the time, I actually talked about this with Charlie a lot behind closed doors, was that there isn't enough education around the anti-Federalist papers.
So one of the things that I would say that is a huge mistake that conservatives make is they there's a lot of books written about the Federalist Papers.
There's a lot of books that comment on the Federalist Papers, the authors, many heroes of the Revolution.
There are many heroes that were the writers behind the names in the anti-Federalist papers.
There's not actually a ton of books written on commentary in the anti-Federalist papers, but they really shape what the arguments for and against, which there are many good arguments that were made about the mistakes and potential pitfalls of a federal government that were made by the anti-Federalists at that time.
And they're not really complicated, although there's some simplified versions of books that say, here's a simplified way to explain the arguments that are made in the anti-federalist papers, especially Patrick Henry and so on.
I cannot encourage enough, especially young people, to also study anti-Federalist literature, especially in private schools, charter schools, public school teachers that are teaching.
They just gloss over or they don't even comment on any of these things at all.
And there's a lot of really important subjects that are in there that are discussed that frame a lot of the problems that we see today.
Blake, just I have one.
I just got remembered.
I just remembered one that was very funny because you mentioned the anti-federalists.
There's a book, it's a bit later than the era you're asking about, but I like it.
It's called Fears of a Setting Sun: The Disillusionment of America's Founders.
And it's just, it's an interesting one to read because if you read it, it turns out if you look at the founders in 1805, they're all blackpilled.
They think it was a total disaster.
What they'd done, messed up.
They're super depressed.
They think it's not going to work out.
That's some great perspective to have because these great men who we know they founded this tremendous country that had so much success, they were blackpilled.
They let themselves get blackpilled.
And so if they, you know, if their country got through that era where they thought it was so terrible, we can get through periods that we think are terrible too.
So I wanted to throw that there.
That's a great question.
I loved that one.
Yeah, really good question.
Really, and by the way, Chernow, David McCullough, those are authors on the Revolutionary War period that are widely read as well.
Many of us are hopeful about the direction the country is headed.
But after years of abuse and mismanagement, things could fall apart at any moment.
That's why I and Americans from all walks of life have taken action to prepare for what's coming next.
And that starts with having an emergency food supply.
Storing food in your home is the right thing to do because we're living in crazy times, which explains why so many people are preparing.
Right now, you can get ready too with a three-month emergency food kit from MyPatriot Supply.
It comes with delicious foods like creamy stroganoff, honey wheat bread, and mushroom rice pilaf.
The entire kit offers over 2,000 calories a day.
This food kit lasts up to 25 years.
Who knows what our country will look like then?
But when that day comes, you'll be ready.
Now, hear from Charlie in his own words.
Just go to mypatriotsupply.com/slash K-I-R-K and join millions of Americans who are preparing today at mypatriotsupply.com/slash Kirk.
That is mypatriotsupply.com/slash Kirk.
Next up is Sarah.
Sarah, please unmute yourself.
Welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show.
So I am from Canada.
And my first question, I have two.
What is your guys' opinion of the Conservative Party of Canada?
Well, so there's two.
Let's just define terms here really quick here, right?
There's the Conservative Party of Canada, CPC, which would be Pierre's party.
I forget, I looked it up how to say it.
Pierre Poliver or whatever.
Yeah.
Poliev?
Polyev.
That's right.
He would be the leader of that party.
That's going to be your more establishment wing of the Conservative Party in Canada, right?
So then you also have the People's Party of Canada, which is the more populist wing.
So when we're saying, are you asking about one or the other or just in general?
The Conservative Party.
Yeah, I'm specifically asking about the official CPC.
CPC.
All right.
So Tyler has actually been working with them.
Well, I've talked to a number of individuals, and there's some just like we have, and just for our Americans that are at home, just like we have some good Republicans.
There are good Republicans and there are bad Republicans and the party's broad-based.
There's some good conservatives, Conservative Party leaders and better Conservative Party leaders that we see across Canada that I think are leaning more towards the things that we like.
I can't speak highly enough of Danielle Smith, although I'm sure Canadians have different, varying opinions.
I mean, Danielle Smith, I think, actually cares enough so much that she has been in contact, the Premier of Alberta, which to put into kind of conceptually is kind of like all-encompassing senator for slash governor almost for Canada for their individual areas.
And so she has been an incredible supporter of what we do at Turning Point and has been at the forefront of having conversations to represent, I think, the more conservative wing from an elected position.
And I know that there are a great number of individuals who have engaged with the Conservative Party in Saskatchewan that have done a great job.
And I think those two nation states within Canada, Alberta and Saskatchewan are the future.
And I think that the Conservative Party, my opinion is this, is that if the Conservative Party were smart, they would consolidate their efforts into those two areas and then spend time with the Conservative activists to grow from there and really wield power,
as we talk about power, against the establishment to try to actually expand their talking points that I think are more successful, which again, Canada combated the complete shutdown of their country during COVID.
It was like the worst parts of the United States, just to put it in perspective.
And I'm sure you have some opinions on that, Sarah.
And there's a number of other different things that obviously happen at the governmental level, the policy level that are terrible that most of the resource-driven individuals that live in the central parts of Canada disagree with, particularly on the oil and the oil basin that exists within Alberta.
There's a lot of oil, by the way, in Canada.
I would say this.
Like, first of all, the establishment wing of conservative parties right now, they're pesky.
They have a way of sticking around.
They have a lot of institutional backing, but they do deals with the bad guys.
They do deals with the bad guys.
And here's the other thing.
I would say to any conservative movement across the Western world is if you are not tapping into the populist energy of your party, you're going to miss the boat.
That's where the activist energy is.
That's where, Sarah, I'm sure that you probably find yourself more about a strong nation, probably limited immigration.
Those are the taproots of energy when it comes to conservative activists.
And if you're not going there because you're afraid that it's, you know, the country's not ready for it, I would just say look at France.
Look at what do we, we've got the Netherlands, look at the UK, what's happening in the UK right now.
The UK is so buttoned up, it makes Canada look like a third world backwater or something.
I mean, that's just the way the UK is.
And yet, Nigel Farage and reform is rising in the polling, rising in the ranks.
And Canada needs to follow that, not be afraid.
The conservative movement needs to embrace the populist energy that's happening because you're either going to go populist left or populist right right now.
The whole entire Western world is either going to go one way or the other.
If you are shunning that side of your party, icing them out, you're going to miss the activist energy.
All right, Tyler, why don't you close this up?
So I'll close this by saying this is the biggest missed opportunity: whether you're in Canada or the UK or the United States, it doesn't really matter anywhere in the Western world.
If you are not identifying the voters and chasing votes, you're not going to be able to, again, we talk about power.
This is part of the reason why I wanted Tiffany on here right with us: that power is consolidated in what you can do with it.
The big missed opportunity of this last election cycle, similar to what we just saw that happened to us in the United States, is in Canada, there was like this energy flux, expectation to win, and then Pierre lost his own election.
Why?
Because they weren't focused and buttoned down enough to chase their own votes to actually flex power.
If you lose, there's nothing that's more embarrassing than to lose your own election when you're hoping to become the prime minister.
And so this is a situation, a scenario that happens.
Same thing in the UK.
If you do not have the tools, you do not have the resources, you do not consolidate, and I completely agree with you around populist messaging, the energy, the ideas that get people up off the couch and out of their seats to actually win, you're not going to win any place.
Yeah, Pierre wasn't able to get people to get behind him.
I mean, there was a huge pushback against a lot of the trans stuff that was happening.
If Pierre had really embraced it and spoken to his customers, the voters, and said, I'm going to push back against this, I think he would have done better.
And he didn't have the ground troops to actually win.
And he didn't have the ground troops to win.
Go ahead, Blake.
I want to weigh in real quick on this, just because I follow a lot of Canadian politics.
I follow too many countries' politics.
So the Canadian Conservative Party, in general, I like to sum it up for people in the U.S. is it's like it's like a conservative party that just cut all social conservative questions out of itself.
Like social conservatives exist in Canada, but they have zero, zero political influence at all.
Like what I like to point to, I would talk to Charlie about this, is in Canada, they have no pro-life movement.
There's no restrictions on abortion at all.
You can get abortion pretty much until birth.
Like a fetus just has no legal existence whatsoever until it is born in Canada.
It's basically them and North Korea on that front.
And that's kind of a good symbol for how Canada approaches all of those questions.
And, you know, the argument would be, well, this makes them more electable.
And yet it also doesn't.
So what you've had with the Conservative Party of Canada is they thought, okay, if we're liberal on all social questions and basically pro-immigration as well, like, I guess you can be more electable.
And they had a conservative prime minister before Trudeau.
But now, like, the country has changed to the point where, honestly, I look at Canada and I wonder what its future as a country is.
Their level of immigration the last five years has been way above ours, basically the highest of pretty much any large country in human history in terms of how many people they brought in.
It's actually messed up the country in a lot of ways.
Their economy has gotten really messed up where problems we have in the U.S., where housing prices are going up too much, much worse in Canada, even though they have nothing but space.
They've really mangled the country in a lot of ways.
And I think the Conservative Party of Canada has some responsibility for that.
But it's a weird country in a lot of ways.
I could do a whole hour on all the ways Canada is bizarre.
Quebec is bizarre.
I'll follow just Blake's just comment there, which is that you have a real problem amongst conservatives.
We actually don't have conservatives working together across borders for things too.
And again, some of this is, I think this is intentional.
The left actually works really, really well across borders with one another.
The progressive parties do.
And our side doesn't at all.
And I actually think that one of the unique things that President Trump has done is by putting pressure on Canada actually helps, I think, long-term drive conservatives together.
Well, maybe long-term, but the short term was that I don't think he helped Pierre's political Pierre wasn't ready for it, right?
It's like he tried to dispose of it.
President Trump threw a Hail Mary pass down the field in a Hail Mary situation for Pierre because clearly Pierre wasn't competent enough to win his own election.
So it's like, President Trump, hold on.
I'm going to push back on that one, Tyler.
I think Pierre was going to win that election, and then Trump kind of went on his Annex Canada digression.
And the truth is, Canada's national identity for a lot of people is being not America or being America, but more liberal.
And it just sort of blew that up.
And that was, I don't think we had a shot after that.
President Trump walked into a catch-22 when taking office.
Do nothing, and America would be staring at a ticking debt bomb, the kind of crisis that could cripple our future.
Instead, he's taken action with strong policies to slow the train and buy us some time.
But the effects of past administration spending are still working through the system, and experts predict dramatic price increases and market uncertainty.
Trump is doing all he can, but no matter who's in office, protecting your retirement savings is ultimately up to you.
And that's why many Americans are turning to real assets like gold and silver.
Preserve gold is our go-to choice here at the Charlie Kirk Show.
We use them because they make it easy to own physical gold and silver even inside your retirement accounts like an IRA or 401k.
Now, hear from Charlie in his own words: Preserve gold is my go-to choice for all my precious metal needs.
They are the real deal, and I recommend them to my friends, family, and viewers.
Get their free wealth protection guide now by texting Charlie to 50-505.
President Trump is fighting for America's future.
Now it's your turn to help protect yours.
All right, next up, we have Jonathan.
How goes?
Hey, Jonathan, how you doing?
Doing great.
So I have two questions that are very related.
Has the speakers for AM Fest 2025 been finalized?
It's never finalized.
It's never finalized.
There's more coming.
There's more coming.
You invite Girls Grand Bible.
We did.
Yeah, we did invite them.
And they're supposed to come last year too, but it didn't.
I noticed that.
Yeah, I remember.
Yeah, it didn't work out logistically.
But yeah, we did invite them.
There's some big speakers yet to be announced that I think that will make people very excited.
We're always working on speakers, too, up to like last minute.
I think last year with President Trump, Charlie booked him like a couple days ago.
Yeah, well, that's a little bit of a problem.
The president, a lot revolves around the president.
The schedule is crazy.
Oh, yeah.
A lot revolves around the president.
And then sometimes these things are last minute.
Sometimes they're intentionally last minute.
But there is a, I think, a number of different people that will be very interesting.
And we're sold out.
So it's just like people are now buying these things on the current market.
Oh, good.
I'm glad you're here.
There was only 2% left available when I got them.
I was very pleased to get them.
Oh, man.
We're looking forward to meeting you.
Yeah, Amfest.
All right.
Thank you, Jonathan.
We'll see you at Amfest.
And definitely.
And if you ride a horse to Amfest, then we'll let you in.
Ride a horse.
It's very, it's very Western.
Very Airbus.
Hi.
How are you?
Hi, Anne.
What's your question?
First, I wanted to say how great you guys are doing.
And I'm really happy that you're continuing the show.
I know how tough it wants to be because it's hard for all of us who are fans for a long time.
And Charlie.
What I'm concerned about is I've been noticing this week, and you've talked about it.
I've heard it on other podcasts, that there are some things that I think are fair to say that the White House has been making missteps with the base and the younger viewers in particular.
And I think that really shows Charlie's absence because I feel like he would have had some influence on it and he could have conveyed the base, you know, kind of the way he did with the Epstein thing.
He could have conveyed the base's position and perhaps been listened to.
And I'm wondering what TPUSA feels that it can do without Charlie and what it is doing to continue his influence with the White House and Congress to explain what, you know, what the base and the younger voters want.
And I'm also wondering who TPUSA feels it has and who the government has to speak to the youth vote and successfully convey that to the government.
Yeah.
Can we play clip 353 again of JD Vance?
We certainly can.
353 because this helps answer that question if we can play 353.
A lot of young people are saying housing is way too expensive.
Why is that?
Because we flooded the country with 30 million illegal immigrants who were taking houses that ought by right go to American citizens.
And at the same time, we weren't building enough new houses to begin with, even for the population that we had.
So what we're doing is trying to make it easier to build houses, trying to make it easier to build factories and things like that so that people have good jobs.
We're also getting all of those illegal aliens out of our country.
And you're already seeing it start to pay some dividends.
So, and love your question because it also is my question every single week is what can the administration do for young people now that Charlie is gone because Charlie is our biggest advocate.
And I think JD Vance has been kind of the mouthpiece for that in honoring Charlie, both in that interview that he just did, but also looking back to Ole Miss just a couple weeks ago with Vice President Vance and Erica Kirk, too.
And at turning point, we're continuing the work.
But the biggest thing, and Charlie said this all the time, we talked about in hour one of today's show, is the biggest thing to help young people in the short term is deportations to drive H1B.
Yeah.
And so JD Vance understood everything that Charlie stood for when it came to young people.
And I think he's doing it pretty incredible.
Yeah, JD has stepped up in a huge way to be that.
And I think a lot of people, we had Chris Ruffo on last week who was saying that JD is basically the guy that can really, you know, do that.
He can sort of, you know, unite some of these warring factions within the conservative movement.
But don't, I would say this also.
Remember that President Trump, time and time again, when he has, he'll send up little trial balloons, right?
And he'll kind of float ideas.
And you never know what 3D chess he's playing.
For example, with the Chinese thing that a lot of people got riled up about 600,000 Chinese visas.
I would be one of them.
However, two days later, Kash Patel says, oh, we've just struck a deal with the Chinese Communist Party to stop all these precursors to fentanyl coming in the country, which, by the way, if you really care about young people, you want to make sure that 100,000 young people every year aren't dying of fentanyl overdoses.
And so you got to, I really do believe that we have to trust a couple things here.
And Charlie would have said the same thing.
He said the same thing when we were bombing Iran, right?
He said, I trust President Trump.
I believe that he's got the best interests at heart of the United States and for our people.
And that includes young people, but he's got a lot of competing interests.
So we have to keep yelling and screaming and making our voices heard.
And I just want to tell you one last thing here is a lot of those relationships that Charlie was so good at within the admin, within the conservative movement, working and talking to and texting and all this back channeling stuff that was happening.
I will just tell you that a lot of those people, when Charlie was assassinated, they ended up coming to a lot of us.
And I know Tyler's in comms with a bunch of them.
Mikey's in comms.
I'm in comms.
Erica's in comms.
And so those relationships, excuse me, those relationships remain intact in some really important ways.
And we're certainly still making our voices heard.
And we're still making sure that the things that Charlie was fighting for, this Gen Z economic moonshot, this revival for the economics of young people, making sure that they have a stake in the American dream, those conversations are still going.
And one last thing: when you talk about deportations, all this stuff, you got to understand we are climbing out of a hole that's very, very deep.
And why?
Because we flooded our economy with cheap money.
We deficit spent for a generation.
And when you do that, it debases the currency.
It inflates asset prices, like homes, stocks, 401ks.
And that's good for economic incumbents, people that already have skin in the game.
It's really bad for people trying to get into the economy as a first rung on that economic ladder.
So you say we deficit spent for a generation, Andrew, like we're not still.
Wow, that's a good point.
It's a fair point.
And that's a fair point.
And that's another debate that we're having on the right, correct, Blake?
That, you know, what are we doing with some of this tariff revenue?
Yeah, some $2,000 dividend check would be great.
But, you know, we really do have to focus on this debt and this deficits.
And there's the budget hawks in D.C. are getting drowned out right now.
It doesn't fight you.
I mean, you basically, I worry, truthfully, that we're kind of getting into more and more of a delusional state on it.
Like, it didn't blow up in our face as quickly as people predicted.
And so you have a lot of people who say deficits don't matter.
I think Cheney said that.
Now you have modern monetary theory, which is a somewhat, well, it's very modern.
We can say that you can just print money forever and there's actually no downside to it.
All I will say is there are many countries that have attempted that, and I don't know of any that have gotten away with it.
And I want to remind everyone too: I don't know if we've done a good enough job of this, and I don't know if the administration has done enough of this.
And they need help, right?
They need all of our help to say, remember when we were coming into the Trump administration, that the word on the street was that we were heading into a massive recession, the biggest one since the Obama recession, and that that was going to happen, and the entire economy was going to crash, that the stock market was going to crash.
Remember all this that was happening at the beginning of last year?
And we have to give credit where credit's due is that the Trump administration stabilized that situation.
And of course, we still have massive problems for young people on how affordability is going to look for the next two decades.
The question you have to ask yourself is: Trump, are you going to trust the Trump administration turn into maybe a JD Vance administration to fix that?
Are you going to trust more of the Joe Biden-style policies and Gabo Newsome and Mom Donnie to do that for you?
Because the answer is going to be no.
We just have to make that pitch very clear.
We have a new clip here, apparently, 388.
The White House wants to cut a bunch of red tape, especially the kind that holds up houses from being built.
With the argument being that the current housing inventory has been flooded for several years with illegal immigrants, new houses plus deportations could free up a lot of existing homes and apartments, according to Vice President Vance.
Yep.
That's from this morning.
New report this morning.
So I think we're getting there.
The message is getting through.
I mean, I'm telling you, this was a pivot from a messaging standpoint that was pretty dramatic.
Wouldn't you agree, Tiffany?
Yeah, and I just want to say the most important thing that we can do for young people in America is to empower them to vote and to get their friends to vote.
I mean, you know, and to run for office, right?
I mean, that is truly how long term we're going to be able to have better policies for the future of families in America.
Yeah, you got to vote.
Got to get out and vote.
Thank you so much.
And next up is Gina, I believe.
Yeah, Gina, welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show.
What's your question?
Thank you, guys.
Just wondering what your thoughts are on, I've seen lately them talking about the USS Liberty.
And I was just curious what some of your feedback is on some of that history.
I can talk about that.
I can talk about that.
Thanks for watching.
If you haven't heard about it, the USS Liberty was an incident in the late 1960s where it was a kind of U.S. like spy ship, sort of a signal monitoring ship.
It would sit in international waters and it would monitor communications.
And during the six-day war between Israel and its Arab neighbors, it was near Israel and Egypt monitoring the situation.
And it gets attacked by Israeli fighter jets.
It's strafed, and I think it's hit by a few bombs or torpedoes.
And about 30, I think 34 U.S. sailors actually are killed.
Several hundred are wounded.
Now, that's a good number, but it's also, it's during the Vietnam War, so it's, you know, when we're having a lot of military casualties.
And it's brought up a lot today.
Charlie, notably, he would get trolled with attacks, or not attacks, with questions about the USS Liberty from Groipers around 2019.
And he would get a lot of questions about it.
And this gets brought up a lot.
It's asked by people who want to criticize America's relationship with Israel.
It's kind of used to argue Israel's not our friend.
Israel's not our ally.
And I would just bring up a few things about it.
First of all, the U.S. government and the Israeli government both did inquiries and they concluded it was an accident.
People will deny this.
I guess what I would say is I don't know why it wouldn't be an accident.
It wouldn't make a lot of sense for Israel to just bomb an American ship as a hostile act just because I've never understood the argument that it would be intentional.
And I would add, sorry, let me continue.
And so on top of that, like they paid us, I'm looking here, in 1968, they paid out $3 million in compensation.
In 1969, another year later, they gave another $3 million in compensation.
And then they paid $6 million in 1980.
Those don't sound like a lot today, but we've had a lot of inflation since then.
So it's actually almost $100 million that we got in terms of payouts related to that.
So it's not like they just ignored it.
It's not like they covered up that it ever happened.
There were major payouts to the people affected by this.
And just in the end, it was an event that happened 60 years ago.
It is not a guiding thing to how we should conduct our foreign policy today.
We're friends with, like, we're pretty close friends with Vietnam, and we went and lost that war to them, you know, around the same time.
And it's just, it's brought up a lot because people want a justification to dislike Israel and to fan, frankly, anti-Semitism.
And it's brought up for that reason.
But there's like a rational way to understand this event as a tragedy, as likely an accident, likely appalling military incompetence.
And fortunately, they did pay compensation to the people affected by that.
That's my overall thoughts on it.
I get that.
Thank you, Black.
Did you have something to add, Tiffany?
No, I think it was an interesting question.
I guess I would ask why the question was asked in the first, like, what's the problem?
Yeah, I didn't realize people were talking about it again.
I've definitely heard other people bring it up throughout the years.
I will say one interesting thing is that Dennis Prager actually wrote a letter and he was kind of going through some of the claims made about Israel.
And I think he was trying to kind of deal with it in a very rational way.
And so this was a letter that he wrote before he got injured in October 2024.
And he basically explained that his position had changed.
He mentions that terrible mistakes happen in every war.
And initially, he thought the Liberty attack might have been another one of those mistakes.
However, he is now, quote, persuaded that the strike on the Liberty was probably deliberate.
He states in that letter that the attack, quote, if everything said about the attack on the Liberty is true, it appears to him been a criminal war crime.
And he expressed frustration that he doesn't understand why both the American and Israeli governments covered it up at the time and have never since explained why it happened.
Now, that POV differs from a lot of the official narratives, but that's coming from Dennis Brager, who is about as Jewish as it gets.
It was a dear friend of Charlie's.
And so I'm just saying, to Blake's other point, you know, it was 60 years ago.
Why does it have to be a guiding light about how we conduct ourselves now?
And if even Dennis Breger, who is, you know, like I said, hard-carrying Jewish guy, written the books of the Torah, the five books of the Torah, I think he's writing his fifth commentary on even now from being bedridden.
We love Dennis.
So I mean, if he's willing to sort of, you know, reassess the way he feels about that story, then I'm not afraid to, certainly.
So I keep an open mind, but again, 60 years ago, and I think people use it as a for alternative.
It got brought up a lot in part because people would get uncomfortable when they were asked about it or they weren't familiar with it.
And so it became kind of a meme for that reason.
Right now, in Ukraine, elderly Jews are trapped in unbearable poverty.
Galena is a 96-year-old Holocaust survivor who has spent her entire life in the same village.
She's sick, alone, and facing another bitterly cold winter.
Today, like every day, she must decide whether to spend what little money she has on food, medication, or heating.
No one should have to live like this.
But for Galena and so many others, this is the harsh reality.
Through the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews and your generous donation, you can bring hope to those in need.
Your gift of just $25 will help provide a food box packed full of life-saving essentials that will help feed Galena and so many like her.
Visit urgentifcj.org.
That's one word, urgentifcj.org or call 866-338-IFCJ.
That's 866-338-4325.
All right, welcome back to the Charlie Kirk Show.
Ask Us Anything, final segment of the day.
Avery, welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show.
Hey, guys, great honor to speak to you today.
Thank you, sir.
Appreciate all you do.
Can't even begin to imagine what the challenges have been like.
I have to think it's much like the disciples questioning God's timing when Jesus left them.
And yet they picked up the ball, built on the foundation, and here we are 2,000 years later with millions and billions in the kingdom of God because of what they did.
And you guys are like, Thank you, Avery.
Thank you.
I wanted to ask, I know this election last week is I don't think you can really take that much from it, but to some extent, it is obviously a little discouraging.
I'm one that wants us to win everything.
I don't want to give an inch.
But so we've got 2026 coming up, and TPUSA and TPUSA action, in my opinion, gave us the wind for 2024.
I know others have played a vital role, but what you guys did, Tyler, was just incredible.
What I need to hear today is some encouragement that um, there's a a good plan being uh put in place to hopefully maybe mobilize this tremendous army with all of the new TP USA chapters and yeah, everything else that is going to give us a victory that we
desperately have to have for 2026.
Otherwise MAGA and Trump is going to have a lambda to those last two years and we can't afford that.
Do you want to address Avery's concerns?
Yeah, so Avery, first off, thank you for that and thank you for the support.
I mean, obviously for the entire audience, the power behind the Charlie Kirk show was that we were able to mobilize tens of thousands of people, really hundreds of thousands of people, maybe millions, if you look at our TikTok and everything else to help change the narrative, change the game for 2024.
Completely agree with you.
Actually, that's why we're so excited that Tiffany's here with us on campus.
I mean, I can literally showcase to you the work that we're doing right now, not just for 2026, but 2028, 2030, 2032, is we're talking about everything 10 years out and working our way backwards, working with the biggest and most impactful organizations across the country to be able to put the boots on the ground where we need them in the right places.
And this is the biggest problem, the challenge that we've talked about.
Charlie talked about this incessantly.
And we will start talking about this a lot more this year now that the clock is ticking through 2026, is we're going to be talking about just the same way that Charlie was talking about all last year of how the right has not done a good enough job at organizing bodies and putting people where we need them most impactfully, start to finish across the country.
And so the thing that we've been discussing all morning, and I will be into the late evening here as we work with Tiffany, is that we have a place to go and strategic targets that matter the most.
And I don't know if you want to talk a little bit about that, Tiffany, about kind of the focuses and bringing people together.
Yeah, I'm just so excited to work with Turning Point Action.
I think you're right that Turning Point was a huge, was the factor that helped us to win in 24 and helped put President Trump in the White House.
And so at Heritage Action, as I said, we do a lot of federal work, a lot of state work.
We're focusing on political action.
We're focusing on acquiring power and working with Turning Point and other organizations in order to mobilize voters, get them out.
And we're looking for the lions.
Paper in the box.
Can I just make an observation?
When we started in this space, and Tyler can attest, it was like dog eat dog.
They didn't want us getting in, invading their terrain.
They were worried about donors, all this stuff.
So to have Heritage Action and Turning Point Action cooperating on this is just like such a huge advancement in the space.
I just want to give you guys both credit for that.
And what I've seen just from my limited time in politics from a mom before, so I'm in it for the right reasons, is the fact that there are a lot of people that get involved and suck money out of the ecosphere of politics.
And, you know, we're here to invest in the American people and making sure that we're getting, as Tyler says all the time, more paper into the ballot box.
Yeah.
And that's the one piece that is probably most impactful is that if we can just by two or three or four percentage points, make the conservative movement more impactful with every dollar that's spent and get that out to GO TV, get out the vote operations, chasing ballots, then you win significantly.
I mean, we're not talking three or four percent more elections.
We're talking about 30 or 40 percent more elections.
All right.
Let's do one more question here.
Scott, what's your question, Scott?
Welcome to the show.
Hey, guys.
Hey, good to talk to you guys.
Hey, Scott.
Thank you.
Hey, yeah, you guys are awesome.
Keep up the good work.
I was just curious.
I've been hearing a lot about Christian Zionism thrown around.
I think I know what it is.
Can you guys hear me?
Yep.
Okay, cool.
I was just wondering if you guys could talk about it a little bit.
What is it?
And is there a general conservative position that we can understand about it?
That's a great Mikey question.
Okay, someone else just said that.
I think this is actually a better blade question.
Truthfully, guys, I don't even have a definition for Zionism.
Yeah, it's can I give just a religious background as being like the most targeted person, probably against the most recent conspiracy theories and stuff.
There is a significant amount of Christians within Christendom that believe that in the Bible, there is an importance with Zionism as it pertains to the second coming of Jesus.
There are a lot of religious Zionists that study religious Zionism, which is different than status Zionism.
And there are a lot of, there's a ton of in-between that goes between this.
Those are conversations.
That's the way that I think Charlie would actually lean into and start describing this conversation.
It makes it, it's kind of unfair because I think a lot of people attack people for being Zionists that are theological Zionists that believe in the second coming and what the gathering of Israel, as members of my church talk about, that talk about the lost 10 tribes, how that impacts and is talked about things that are in the New Testament.
And that's really important to, again, Jesus coming back.
And it actually puts a really awkward position for a lot of people who are theologians that talk about Zionism that generally believe how important that is versus, again, the statistical idea of establishing the state of Israel.
Now, that's not to say that people don't believe that the state of Israel is really important to that theological position.
It just is never really discussed when people are lobbying back and forth this idea of Christian Zionism and why that's impactful.
And no one, not very many people that I've seen, have adequately spoken to that issue in a way that's really important for people to understand the actual debate.
You can have disagreements with the state of Israel while also supporting the theological idea of Zionism and the second coming of Jesus Christ.
And that's to me where my position is and how I've described and explained it.
But you never hear that debate for the most part on social media.
It's back and forth lobbying, you know, hurls of that end up being people accusing people of being anti-Semitic or vice versa, the other side of being overly pro-Zionist or pro-you know, Israel first is the new thing or mega, make Israel great again type stuff.
And that, and again, it's missing the whole point where there's a theological argument.
That's why I brought it in.
Anyway, sorry, Blake.
Yeah, go ahead, Blake.
So just the original question is just what is Christian Zionism?
So Zionism, what it in its simplest term means is Zionism is support for having a homeland for Jewish people in the historic ancient land of the Jews.
So Israel, basically, Palestine, whatever you want to call it.
So it is the belief in that.
That is the core of what Zionism is.
Now, that has manifested as specifically the state of Israel for a variety of events, but it was originally just created as let us settle there and sort of the political stuff evolved out of that.
So in the present day, Christian Zionism would basically be supporting Jewish people having a homeland in the Holy Land.
Why people support that?
There's a bunch of different reasons.
There's a bunch of different reasons Jews supported it because there are religious Jews who believe that the return to Israel is a religious commandment.
It's a manifestation of God's will for them.
There are non-religious Jews who just support it for secular reasons.
They believe that the Jewish people should have a homeland to get away from anti-Semitism, to just have a homeland because nations should have homelands, things like that.
So why do Christians support it?
A variety of reasons.
So a common one we heard on the show was just there's lines in the Bible, you know, the Lord will bless those who bless Israel.
And so they would transmute that to today with the Jewish people and the state that they have, Christians should support it the same way they should support Christian peoples.
There's also, as Tyler mentioned, some believe there's an eschatological element related to the end of the world, that like Israel existing will fulfill requirements for the end times.
I will say I hear about that reason a lot more from people who don't like Israel than I actually hear about it from other evangelical Zionists.
So I know it exists.
I've seen sermons about it.
I've seen writings about it.
But I don't feel for the average Christian Zionist that's really the thing driving it.
And then another thing is just some people support it for like ordinary political reasons.
An argument I gave to Charlie, one of the best reasons to support Israel is just they are a like Western, modern, democratic, fundamentally culturally European country that is constantly surrounded and under attack by violent third world Islamism.
And those third world Islamists, Hamas, the people who would go door to door murdering people in Israel would also be happy to go door to door murdering people in Vienna or in London or in Washington, D.C.
And a lot of left-wingers would seal clap about how much they love that if they saw that happening.
And so a reason to support them would just be: okay, we oppose third world Islamism, and so we would support a nation that is under attack by it.
So it's a complicated question.
There's a lot of reasons Christians would be Zionists, and I don't think you want to reduce it to one thing.
And there's differences in scale.
So some Zionists would just say we offer them moral support.
Some people would say we offer them financial and military support.
Some people would go whole hog and arguably be fanatical supporters.
And there's been complaints about some American politicians who seem that way.
But it's a complicated question.
And I don't think you want to reduce it to one single stereotype of them in any way.
Any way you'd want to reduce anyone on like the immigration question.
There's a lot of points of view that go into that as well.
So I hope that's helpful for it.
Well said, well said.
Christian Zionism is a term I never even really heard before recently, which is something, I mean, I'd heard of Zionism certainly, but now it's sort of, you said, hurled insults back and forth.
I think it's a term that's been hurled a lot more lately.
Well, it's important to understand, too, the left is using that term to attack the right.
That's right.
Right.
And so when people on our side adopt it, like even a huge tiny minority adopt that, they're actually helping, again, the left is really good at phraseologies.
They did this, like it was Christian nationalism, remember?
And now it's Christian Zionism as part of that.
And that's actually coming from a little bit of a more radicalized side on their side that the moderate Democrats are trying to be like, whoa, whoa, whoa, don't attack in that way because they're actually bleeding a ton of members of the Jewish faith.
And again, part of this is that you have a number of individuals who are Jewish that are now becoming more Republican, becoming more conservative.
We're seeing this broad base across the country.
And that really starts to impact states like New Jersey and other places.
And they're worried about this.
And so it is wholly politically, forget everything else other than what we know about the left is when they brand people certain ways and they utilize these terms, it's for their own benefit.
And helping the left do that is wholly politically stupid.
Counterproductive.
Highly counterproductive.
Especially when, you know, again, I don't think the Israel issue is on the minds of most Americans.
Like we're talking about this this week, especially about young people.
It's not on the minds of, it's not your top three issues.
Your top three issues right now is focus on America first, which is putting food on the table, paying your rent/slash mortgage, and where are my kids going to go to school and are they going to be protected from criminals?
Yeah, there is no doubt that the left has very much enjoyed the fractures and the division that they're seeing on the right.
And if we could all work as hard on elections and getting the vote out as we do and fighting with each other, we would be a bunch of people.
Let's focus our energies on winning elections.
Listen, sometimes you got to have these debates.
Sometimes you got to have them out in the open.
And I think at the end of this debate, I hope that we end up in a stronger, more unified place.
And hopefully, listen, coalitions, they shift and they morph and they change over time.
And sometimes that comes through important debates.
And so I'm not afraid of the debate, but I do hope, to Tiffany's point, that we can really focus our attention moving forward on winning.
And winning.
And this is the benefit that's coming out of all this is like Christianity is, and people rediscovering their faith is huge.
And so people trying to take away from that with issues that are sub-issues, again, I don't think are as helpful.
And again, there's a lot of fracturing within the Christian.
I mean, I think this is really at its core where the fight exists is that people that believe different things within different Christian sects.
And it's like, that is, that has always been a battle in America.
America has been known as the place where, you know, different elements of Christian faiths have fought it out and they've had their differences, but then they've come together and they've respected one another and they've built society that's the best society in the world.
And so, again, we cannot allow the differences in opinions, even within our own core faith systems, to fracture us.
I think that the argument that is being made by a lot of people is like, hey, we can have mutual respect for one another that we disagree on a lot of things faith-based.
Everybody does.
But, you know, we have a lot more in common, particularly as Christians, than we do differences.
The freedom to practice our religion in this country.
And it all starts with free will.
And that is free agency.
That is a really important part to what makes us successful.
Focus on building things that are positive within your own faith-based core and show others why your faith is the most, the things that you believe are the most important.
And maybe take a page from the left in 2004, Jared Polis and the blueprint and say, let's check some of these issues at the door and understand that winning is the most important thing that we can do in order to take our country back.
You're not going to take your country back if you disagree.
It's a good place to end it.
Thank you guys.
Great having you here, Tiffany from Heritage Action.
