All Episodes
Previous Next
May 19, 2025 - The Charlie Kirk Show
34:38
Joe Biden's Cancer Coverup?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey everybody, Charlie Kirk here, live from the Bitcoin.com studio.
Live from London, I give you an update of why I'm thankful to be an American.
And then we cover the Biden her tapes.
And the prostate cancer diagnosis and more.
Email us, as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Subscribe to the Charlie Kirk Show podcast and become a member today, members.charliekirk.com.
That is members.charliekirk.com.
Get involved at Turning Point USA today at tpusa.com.
That is tpusa.com.
Buckle up, everybody.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
I want you to know we are lucky.
To have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of The Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals.
Learn how you can protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at noblegoldinvestments.com.
That is noblegoldinvestments.com.
It's where I buy all of my gold.
Go to noblegoldinvestments.com.
Okay, everybody, radio stations across the country, should I say across the world, honored to be with you as always.
I believe this is our first ever broadcast internationally, definitely our first ever broadcast across the ocean.
We are in Europe.
We're in London right now, and we are doing lots of different things.
I'm debating in Cambridge momentarily, actually, and then tomorrow I will be debating at the Oxford Union.
So we are here on the front lines debating on the issues that matter most that are pressing on Western civilization.
Tonight I'll be doing an open mic Q&A format.
And then on Tuesday I will be doing two debates at the Oxford Union.
Great honor and lots to...
We'll be doing our show live here later in the program.
We have Mike Davis and we have Alex Marlowe.
We also have Senator Eric Schmidt joining the show, the great senator from the state of Missouri.
And I want to dive in, of course, with the news that happened over the weekend.
Two points of news that are noteworthy and are very important.
The first of which is that we finally got our hands on the Robert Hur tapes.
Now, remember...
Robert Herr was investigating Joe Biden for his mishandling of classified documents.
Joe Biden mishandled classified documents allegedly by putting the documents in the garage, and none of us were really that overly animated about it if it meant that Donald Trump simultaneously was also not going to be indicted for similar charges for the January 6th-related The more interesting part of this,
though, and remember they recommended no charges for Joe Biden.
Remember when Robert Herr wrote this report, this scathing report, saying that Joe Biden does not have the mental acuity to be president.
Now, we've known this, and what I'm about to tell you is without a doubt one of the most egregious, one of the most outrageous examples of not just media bias, but intentional, And repeated media malpractice in American history.
We get asked all the time by members of the media, why do you guys not trust us?
Where does this come from?
This right here is why the American people, why the media far too often has become the enemy of the people.
Remember, her said that Biden would just seem like a forgetful old grandfather.
So that's why he wasn't worth indicting.
He was essentially too old and too feeble to prosecute.
This guy's barely living, is basically what Robert Hurst said.
And the media told those of us that noticed Joe Biden's mental decline for years that you are wrong, that you are spreading myths and disinformation.
People were smeared and canceled and silenced because we saw it in right-wing circles because we actually saw the videos.
Publicly, where Joe Biden was unable to mutter sentences.
And the media, I would say they should be ashamed of themselves, but I don't even know if they're capable of feeling shame that requires some form of self-awareness, that requires the media to have some sort of understanding that they should be in the pursuit of truth, but not in the pursuit of power.
What I'm about to play for you here should take your breath away.
This guy was President of the United States.
There are so many questions here, the first of which is, who is running the country?
The second which is, why were we not able to get these tapes last year?
The New York Times in June of 2024 said Biden was being smeared by misleading videos.
That's what we were being told.
We were being told that misleading videos were smearing Joe Biden's character in presidency.
That you're a right-wing disinformation artist.
And the media did not cover it.
In fact, they covered it up.
The media actively covered it up.
And I'm going to connect all the stories together because also, breaking yesterday was Joe Biden's prostate cancer diagnosis.
I don't wish that upon him.
I actually don't want my political adversaries and enemies to get sick and to die.
We all die eventually.
But let's be honest.
The cancer announcement.
Is, of course, directly correlated as a cover-up because of these her tapes.
They were waiting to announce the news of Joe Biden's cancer diagnosis because of what you are about to hear.
Hold your breath.
This guy was president of the United States.
Playcut 186.
Where did you keep papers that related to those things that you were actively working on?
I don't know.
This is, what, 2017, 18, that period?
Yes, sir.
Remember, in this time frame, my son has either been deployed or is dying.
And so, it was...
And by the way, there were still a lot of people at the time when I got out of the Senate that were encouraging me to run in this period, except the president.
Now, it was beyond struggling to say the basic timelines.
This guy was president of the United States?
And also, some of the media is like, well, we never knew because of these tapes.
I mean, these tapes are really bad.
Like, Joe Biden publicly is just about as bad as we just heard on this, her tape.
They knew how bad this was.
But the media hated Donald Trump so much.
The media hated our conservative movement so much that they were adamant that Joe Biden should continue as president of the United States, regardless of the fact that he could not be president.
And then, breaking yesterday, play cut 179.
Breaking news out of the White House about former President Joe Biden.
His office just revealed that the 46th president is diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer.
So they announced that Joe Biden has prostate cancer two days after the Hur reports.
Everybody, they were running this man for re-election less than 10 months ago.
They're saying that the prostate cancer has metastasized straight to the bone.
Sorry to hear that.
Prostate cancer is notoriously very, very slow moving.
This is another one of Joe Biden's piece of conversation with Robert Herr.
Play cut 196.
And what's happened in the meantime.
Is that Trump gets elected in November of 2017?
2016.
All right.
So...
Why did I have 2017 here?
That's when you left office in January of 2017.
Yeah, okay.
But that's when Trump gets sworn in.
Right, right, correct.
And in 2017, Bo had passed.
He keeps thinking that Donald Trump was elected in 2017, and they keep on correcting him.
And look, we have to get to a break here, but how many times does he have to mention the fact that Bo Biden was dying?
Was this just a clutch, a crutch, I should say, that he was using?
At every corner and every single turn?
Beau Biden died in 2015.
We know that Joe Biden did not have the mental faculties.
I said this to the face of reporters for years, and they said, oh, no, no, you're just a right-wing extremist.
And these reporters actively covered up one of the greatest scandals in American history.
Praise the Lord we ever really get through it and get President Donald Trump elected.
Hey everyone, Charlie Kirk here.
You worked hard, raised your family, paid your taxes, and followed the rules, and now you're watching the country you love being torn apart by the radical left.
You're asking, what can I do?
Well, you're not alone and you're not powerless.
President Trump is back in the White House and he's taking bold action, fixing trade with tariffs that actually help American workers, cutting government waste and standing up for Christian values.
But he can't win this fight without you.
That's why I want you to join AMAC, the organization for patriotic Americans over 50 who still believe in America.
AMAC stands for your values, freedom, faith, and fiscal sanity, and it's just $16 a year.
You'll get a subscription to the AMAC Magazine, access to exclusive money-saving discounts, and most importantly, you'll be part of something bigger than yourself.
Go to amac.us slash charlie, that is amac.us slash charlie, and join the fight to save this country.
Let's do this together.
Okay, everybody, welcome back.
Email us, as always, freedom at charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast.
That is the Charlie Kirk Show podcast page.
We are here live.
I know we're having some tech issues.
Let's see if Senator Eric Schmidt can hear me or not.
I sure hope so.
Senator Schmidt, welcome to the program.
Thank you for your patience.
How are you doing today?
I'm good.
By the way, do you have some pre-debate routine you do?
Do you have a certain number of push-ups or something?
What's the protocol, Charlie?
Well, you know, it's interesting.
I try to eat very clean.
You've got to get your sleep.
It's very important.
I always like to have a banana.
I do like to work out and go for a walk.
And then there is the secret, secret weapon.
Hydration.
Almost every study shows that if you are hydrated, you think more clearly, your brain relaxes.
So try to drink a lot of water.
The only downside, and when I do these three-hour campus debates, of which I want to come to the University of Missouri and do that, when I overly hydrate, I've got to sit there for three hours.
I've got to use the restroom.
Pretty terrible.
We're in the big leagues at Oxford and Cambridge.
You are.
You're like our American intellectual prize fighter.
We're pulling for you.
That's funny.
I have to write down the full routine.
It's a great question.
But thank you for joining the program.
You're awesome and doing great work.
So I want to just first get your reaction to these Robert Herr tapes and the cover-up of Joe Biden's health and his mental frailty.
Obviously, we're sorry to hear the news about that he has prostate cancer.
We don't wish that upon anybody.
This timing of when they dropped the news is awfully suspicious.
But who was running the...
It's a great question.
And we ought to, honestly, we ought to have hearings about this because I was the first senator to call for that constitutional process to go into play to remove him because he was clearly not competent.
Anybody with a half a brain could see that.
And when the Hurt tapes came, they never released actually the audio of the tapes, but you got to remember, you go back when they interviewed him, it was about the documents that were, of course, stored in his garage.
We're Hunter Biden, who, you know, had all sorts of dealings with other countries and potentially a drug addict was living in that house at the same time those documents were in the garage.
The only reason they didn't charge him was because they didn't think he was competent to stand trial.
So, I mean, all these things were happening at once.
Anybody could see it.
And if his debate performance...
Wouldn't have been as bad as it was, and I was in the spin room with Rubio and Vance and others, and you could see it playing in real time like everybody else.
If it wouldn't have been so bad, they would have literally continued to keep him propped up just so they could have another four years.
It was all about power and control, and this sort of come-to-Jesus moment that they're all having now is so phony, because they knew it.
But who was running the country?
It's a great question.
A lot of people have different theories.
But, you know, it was being run by Autopen, but who was hidden?
Who was hit and go?
We ought to figure that out.
Yeah, and it's also just this question of what form and structure of government did we have and do we have, which is, if you can have a president who does not know what year he took office, who does not know what year he left office as vice president, does not know what year President Trump actually got elected, and the country can still quote-unquote run, then is the president nothing more than a kind of ceremonial figurehead?
Well, listen, this is what we're fighting against, Charlie.
I'm glad you sort of framed it like that.
We're fighting against this managerial and administrative state that was created really about 100 years ago with Woodrow Wilson, who...
Prior to Joe Biden, I think, was the worst president we've ever had in this country.
Their dream, the progressives' dream, was to have a government run by experts.
And so when COVID happened, kind of the veil went down, and you could see what they really wanted.
It wasn't about elected leadership.
It was about Lord Fauci and these other quote-unquote experts who knew better than everybody else.
So this idea of we the people, they would love to get rid of that, and they would love to get rid of that accountability and have this sort of permanent Washington.
The managerial class run everything.
And so this is what they had going.
And why, you know, people were attacked so viciously if you, quote unquote, question the science or you ask questions about who was running the country at the time because they got exactly what they wanted.
But that's why it's so important for President Trump to have won and for him to have gotten his cabinet appointees approved who are reformers who want to disrupt what we've seen over the last...
I love that.
I'm going to keep you for another segment, Senator.
And this is one of the most important fundamental structural issues.
And understand that a deep state bureaucracy running the government is not just an American problem.
I am here in London, and I just met with Liz Truss, former prime minister.
And she said, we have an entire bureaucracy that runs the government.
That there is this clash between the sovereign, the people, and the deep state.
This worldview has enveloped the entire Western world.
The difference is that our Constitution was supposed to prevent it.
And now it is the people versus the administrative class.
Back with Senator Schmidt in just a second.
Ask 10 people to define the word capitalism.
How many different responses do you think you'll get?
This is a word that comes up all the time, but does anyone know what it really means?
Do you?
Hillsdale College offers more than 40 free online courses.
That's right, free online courses on subjects like the Book of Genesis, the rise and fall of the Roman Empire, the history of the ancient Christian church.
It's hard for me to even say which is my personal favorite.
You guys have got to take these online courses.
They've recently launched a new course, Understanding Capitalism, that I've been watching.
In seven lectures, you'll learn about the role of profit and loss, how human nature plays a part in our economic system, why capitalism depends on private property rights, the rule of law, and above all, freedom, and why capitalism is ultimately a system that encourages morality rather than undermines it.
Right now, go to charlieforhillsdale.com to enroll.
There's no cost, and it's easy to get started.
That's charlieforhillsdale.com to register, C-H-A-R-L-I-E for Hillsdale.com.
Senator Eric Schmidt continues with us here.
So I want to now shift gears for a second and talk about the reconciliation bill and kind of where that is standing and the one big beautiful bill.
Senator, admittedly, there are so many people talking past each other right now.
The White House has a certain opinion and stance, and there's so much good in this bill.
I spent about 40 minutes reading this bill.
It takes you longer than 40 minutes, but...
You could basically get the main components of it on Friday.
For example, there's an amazing thing in the bill of taxing of remittances, which will basically financially and economically make illegal immigration untenable, which is the money that people send back.
To their home and native countries.
It's the largest investment in border security in American history.
No tax on tips.
No tax on overtime.
We're going to see across the board tax cuts.
Drill baby drill.
And also the repeal of a lot of Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act nonsense.
But Senator, do you believe that it cuts discretionary spending enough?
Senator?
I don't.
And that's, I think, where the...
Where the rubber's really going to meet the road.
It's also got some great school choice provisions in it, which are, you know, at the end of the day, we can tout.
But I do think, here's how I look at it, and I think we've talked about it before.
Normally, when you do an appropriations bill, or even a continuing resolution, or even these ridiculous omnibuses, it takes 60 votes in the United States Senate, right?
So the Republicans that want to spend more money...
We are hunting for working with Democrats who want to spend more money.
And that's how you get to the 60 votes.
And that's why spending typically continues to go up and up.
This is different in the sense that you only need 51 votes in the United States Senate.
So we do have a real chance to reset the amount of money that we're spending every year.
That's how I look at it.
It's historic to deliver on President Trump's promises.
And by the way, he's talked about having a balanced budget himself.
I really believe if we're serious about spending reform here, we can get there by the end of his term, because if you just get to pre-pandemic spending levels, plus population growth, plus inflation, and you hold that line for a couple of years, revenues will catch up and you'll have a balanced budget.
That's how I see it.
I do hope that they get a little bit more serious about the spending reforms over in the House.
That's what I want to see in the Senate, too.
And I think that's what's kind of going on behind the scenes right now.
They're continuing to move that process forward.
The Budget Committee passed it out, I think, last night.
So this will be a big week for where the House actually lands.
So all this conversation about SALT stuff, that, to me, whatever.
I don't...
That's not a big deal to me.
I know it is the people, you know, the reps in New York and in California.
Well, hold on.
Let me tell you why it's not a big deal.
It's not a big deal because Missouri largely has its act together.
And you guys don't extract 10% of your citizens' income every year to fund a bloated social welfare bureaucracy.
And that's where I'm torn.
I'm not torn, but why I'm against the...
The SALT thing, which is it's an indirect subsidy of the failed pension system of New York, the failed public sector teacher unions of Chicago.
It's an indirect federal subsidy that do not make these states get their house in order.
Senator, unfortunately though, what we've seen since the SALT deduction Is these states, when we got rid of it with Trump, these states did not get their act together.
But you could make an argument, and I know that the New Yorkers don't want to hear it.
I know the Californians don't want to hear it.
But once we got rid of salt, I think a lot of Republicans or smart people that want to pay lower taxes left the blue states going to red states, which is one of the reasons why Arizona is getting redder and Georgia is getting redder.
Again, we don't make the policy based on that, but you can make the argument salt makes people start getting rid of salt makes people voting with their feet.
What are some of the other interesting nuggets of good stuff in this bill that you want to make sure remains?
Well, you've got even on the defense side, right?
And so you put me in the category.
I did a thing with Politico.
They had me as a MAGA Republican, this American realist.
There's like a zoo animal they like poking.
So I did an interview with them in their defense forum last week.
And just said, look, the days of us being everywhere all at once all the time, it's not realistic.
President Trump, I think, gave a great speech in Saudi Arabia.
Maybe one of the great presidential speeches I've heard.
I've never heard a president articulate that vision on the world stage like he did.
And it's long past time.
We've squandered that inheritance.
Nobody ever adjusted 30 years ago.
Now President Trump is.
So you've got some...
You've got some real opportunities in the defense side for the Golden Dome, for procurement reform.
You mentioned the border.
It would help accelerate deportations with the dollars, because they're adding more people under expedited removal.
You don't actually need to go through all the hearings that the Democrats are calling for through expedited removal.
That's people who have been here for less than two years.
It adds more money for that, so you can process more people more quickly.
So, on the border side, on the defense side, And then on the energy side, I think it really kind of ratchets up the good stuff.
Pulls back some of the Inflation Reduction Act stuff that was really wasteful.
So all in all, all the stuff we want to do, that's good.
But I do think there's still a lot of room to have more spending reform.
So again, we just can't keep spending $2 trillion we don't have every year.
It's not sustainable.
It's just not sustainable.
So I think that's where things are at right now.
But there's a lot of great stuff.
I mentioned the school choice.
You had mentioned a few of those things already.
There's a lot of provisions in there that are President Trump's priorities and what conservatives have been looking for for a long time, that we only need simple majorities.
So if we stick together, we can get it done.
But I do think we've got to get serious about spending reform.
So, yeah.
And where would you say is the ripest for spending reform that we should emphasize?
And secondly, I don't know where you stand on this.
Our podcast is doing very well.
Praise the Lord.
We are on the higher income earner.
I'm not, like, I don't want to pay more in taxes, obviously.
I think I pay way too much in taxes.
But if I have to pay 3% more in taxes, and you guys are able to cut a trillion dollar in spending to make the math work, I don't think we should be overly ideological about it.
And because the math is so compelling that if we raise taxes by 2% on high-income earners, that could actually offset some of the tax cuts for no tax on tips.
Is that still being entertained?
I know Speaker Johnson removed it.
The one thing we should be ideological about is not having America go bankrupt above and beyond all.
Again, I'm not asking Congress to raise my taxes, but I can say as someone who would see my taxes go up, I would be okay with it if we get serious spending cuts and if it gets us on a path towards a balanced budget.
Has that been dismissed?
Is that idea still alive?
Please, Senator, your thoughts.
Yeah, I think, look, the truth of the matter is, and let's just take Medicaid, for example.
If you do work requirements, if you have regular audits to make sure the people who are actually receiving the benefits, and there are people, we've made a decision, and I agree with it, the people who cannot help themselves in particular, people with, you know...
Individuals with disabilities, poor kids.
Absolutely, that should be a safety net that we need to strengthen in many ways.
And I think there's efforts to do that.
But people who are able-bodied ought to be working.
And I don't think that's controversial.
But we don't do that now.
So that's one way that you can provide some savings and I think re-secure that network for the people who need it most.
But also, and Ron Johnson's talked a lot about this.
You know, if you went through individually, and I hope that we do this because we got to get this right.
Like I said, I don't know that we'll get another chance in it.
This is my third year in the Senate.
It could be the only time in my time in the Senate we ever get this opportunity through reconciliation with the trifecta.
If you just go back, we were spending $4 trillion before the pandemic in 2019.
We spent $7 trillion.
We take in $5 trillion.
If you could just go back and say, you know what?
The COVID spending, or I should say the IRA, the ARCA money, all that ARPA money, that blew the lid off of.
Let's go back, and if you look at what Doge is doing, Charlie, a lot of what they're doing when they talk about reducing the number of employees in departments like at Veterans Affairs, they're just talking about getting back to where we were four years ago, right, to make it more manageable and deliver great service.
So I think if you were a little bit more...
I'm precise about that.
There's a lot of savings that can be found.
But I talked to President Trump on Saturday.
I never divulge private conversations, but he's talked about this publicly.
You know, what we're seeing with some of the revenue...
That he's instituted with the tariffs.
That is sort of a part of this calculation, too.
And ultimately, the vision is to get to a place where we have external revenue to the point where you can eliminate the income tax for people making it for $200,000 a year.
That's a massive shift.
So we talked about this progressive form of government that was really instituted 100 years ago.
President Trump's going after all those assumptions, right?
He's saying that...
That the income tax, as it's been created and evolved over 100 years, really punishes work and working families.
We've had the jobs that have been shipped overseas because of our terrible trade policy.
We've had a foreign policy that wasn't adjusted in 30 years because, you know, we squandered this inheritance.
People didn't adjust.
It was meant to kind of get our allies back on their feet in Europe and Japan.
And we never said, hey, maybe you need to start ponying up from your own defense.
I think if you do all those things, you have energy.
You have this regulatory reform.
We're going to see a lot of savings.
And again, the goal of balancing the budget.
That's my goal.
And I think that's President Trump's goal, too.
Senator, thank you so much for your time.
Really appreciate it.
Sorry we couldn't go deeper into some of this, but thank you for the great work.
And thank you for fighting hard for the country and for Missouri.
Senator, thank you so much.
Private student loan debt.
So many Americans feel stuck and helpless.
They are the sponsor of our campus tour.
They are great people.
You can finally take control of your student loan situation at YReFi.com.
That is Y-R-E-F-Y.com.
They provide you with a custom loan payment based on your ability to pay.
YReFi is not a debt settlement company, and they work with each borrower individually, tailoring each loan to each borrower's specific.
You'll not be calling a faceless call center.
YReFi can reduce your monthly payment and guarantees interest rates under 6%.
YReFi does not care what your credit score is.
Go to YReFi.com.
That is Y-R-E-F-Y.com.
So take a look at it right now at YReFi.com.
YReFi refinances distress and defaulted private student loans, which are different from federal loans.
They offer a three-minute rate check.
So I want you to think right now.
Maybe you have private student loan debt.
Maybe your friend does.
Maybe your neighbor.
Got to check it out.
YREFI.com.
Y-R-E-F-Y.com.
Can you imagine being debt-free and not burdened anymore?
Go to YREFI.com.
May not be available in all 50 states.
YREFI.com.
Okay, everybody, welcome back.
Email us, as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
So I'm here live in London.
I want to just give you a little update here.
There's some really exciting things happening.
And simultaneously, there are incredible troubling things that makes me, every time I come to the UK, I'm just so thankful to be an American.
They've got so many problems here.
And they have cultural problems alongside political problems.
So firstly, the good news.
Some of the by-elections here in London, Nigel Farage's Reform Party is doing very, very well.
Everybody I'm talking to who knows what...
They're saying Nigel Farage is the favorite to become the next Prime Minister of the UK.
They say the Reform Party is ascendant.
They say that the old Conservative Party is dead and they were not Conservatives at all.
And the Reform Party is the new opposition party.
That they are gaining momentum.
They are gaining strength.
And honestly, we are Nigel Farage's biggest fan as they are trying to continue to do that.
So straight from the front lines here, there is a Movement that is afoot.
But what is needed here is the grassroots.
And we just sat down with Liz Truss and her team.
We were talking about this.
She was the Prime Minister back in 2022 for a little while.
And there is a fundamental issue in the UK.
And it's both a cultural one and it is a political one.
The United Kingdom, Britain, England gave us our free speech ancestry.
Free speech came from the UK.
The UK has decided to no longer embrace a culture of freedom of speech or dialogue.
They have the misinformation and disinformation police.
Did you know that 30 people a day, according to the Telegraph, are arrested for inflammatory social media posts?
Knocks on your door.
30 people a day in the United Kingdom.
Do you know that Britain, Had the same GDP per capita as the United States of America in 2008.
Now, the UK is substantially poorer than the United States of America as a GDP per capita.
The UK embraced this nonsense of a nation of immigrants.
Do you know every part of the UK except London is behind our poorest state in America, Mississippi?
And we love Mississippi.
It's just a poor state.
Every single part of the UK.
The UK is a very, very poor country with a very, very rich city, London.
The rest of the UK is extremely poor.
There is an opportunity here, but to be perfectly honest, if you do not have a culture that embraces freedom of speech, that embraces dialogue, Then you're not able to solve your other political problems.
It is a first principle truth.
If you are not able to complain, call out, challenge, power, if you're not able to persuade people, if you're not able to ridicule your leaders, then how are you actually ever going to fix all of the other problems?
In fact, I was just driving in a car and I said to my driver, I said, you guys got, you've imported way too many Muslims into this country.
And they're like, did you just say that?
I'm like, yeah.
You guys have way too many Mohammedans in your country.
You see, they're thinking it, but the spoken word is what's important.
Because they're afraid that they might get a knock on the door.
Or it's very unseemly, from British standards, to say such things.
They're a little gun-shy.
Free speech is a cornerstone of a vibrant country.
And I'm sorry, when I'm walking down to Piccadilly Square...
And every other shop has Arabic.
When I go see a cafe and every woman is fully in a hijab, that's not Britain.
That's something else.
You might want that.
You might think that's a good thing, but it's something else.
That is not the United Kingdom.
The spoken word is the catalyst for creation.
God spoke creation into being.
Speech is powerful.
In the beginning was the word, as it says in John 1, which is the logos.
It is the spoken word, not the thought, not just the internalized truth.
You must speak it and it becomes material reality.
I will say, though, that if the stars align, based on my conversation with the grassroots here and the drivers and the cabbies, And the working folk, there is a political revolution waiting to happen in the UK.
You need someone with courage, and I think Farage is that person.
You need a series of influencers.
Things need to start breaking their way.
I'm telling you right now, there could be a political revolution like the Trump one.
And they're just looking for their Trump in some way.
And it could be Nigel Farage.
And the Reform Party is doing very, very well.
But they need to start speaking out more.
And not carrying the social cost.
Ooh, I don't want to be called a racist by the London Times.
Who cares?
That's so 2008 around America.
Speak the truth, regardless of cost.
You can take back Britain.
Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
Email us, as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Thanks so much for listening.
▲
Export Selection