Listen to Charlie's full conversation with California Gov. Gavin Newsom on the first episode of his new podcast. The two of them discuss men in women's sports, why liberals are suddenly faltering so badly with young people, why conservatives are winning the podcast space, and more. Plus, Charlie cuts in with a few follow-up thoughts of his own at a few key points in the episode.Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Hey everybody, this is the entirety of my conversation with Gavin Newsom, but also with my commentary.
If you want to listen to it without any commentary, that is on Gavin Newsom's podcast page, which I have an obligatory, let's just say, duty to say.
If you want to listen to that, you can go to This is Gavin Newsom.
But if you want to listen also with my commentary throughout, that's why you are here.
Become a member today at members.charliekirk.com.
That is members.charliekirk.com.
Get involved with Turning Point USA at tpusa.com, tpusa.com.
And email me as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
That is freedom at charliekirk.com.
Subscribe to the Charlie Kirk Show podcast.
Buckle up, everybody.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country.
He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA. We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of The Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals.
Learn how you can protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at noblegoldinvestments.com.
That is noblegoldinvestments.com.
It's where I buy all of my gold.
Go to noblegoldinvestments.com.
Okay, everybody, you've been asking for the entire conversation with Gavin Newsom.
And myself.
I'm going to be giving commentary throughout this conversation about some of my thoughts, but it is the entire thing that you'll be able to watch.
Also, the full unedited, let's just say with no commentary, is on Gavin Newsom's YouTube page, but I think you want to stay right here.
Make sure you guys hit subscribe on this extremely viral conversation that I had with Gavin Newsom.
Starts out with Gavin Newsom talking about how his son is a big fan of mine.
History of Turning Point USA. History of what we've done at Turning Point USA. And our goals and mission.
By the way, anyone out there, you guys should get involved with Turning Point USA. You should start a Turning Point USA chapter.
You should get involved with Turning Point Action.
We are moving the dial.
We are bringing this generation to the finish line to be a conservative generation.
So here it is.
The beginning of my chat.
With Governor Gavin Newsom.
By the way, what brings you to California, your favorite state?
It is my favorite state in the union.
You're doing such a great job here, by the way.
No, I'm honored to be on the show.
Thank you.
You were just down at USC? I was at USC yesterday, drew a big crowd.
By the way, I knew you were at USC early because my niece, who graduated...
She was the one with the MAGA hat on.
By the way, I do have to watch.
But she was down there, and she was like...
You never know.
These kids are going to the right.
I'm aware.
She said, this crowd's crazy.
And the only reason she said it, she would have said it perhaps otherwise, but she knew you were coming on.
The worst part, though, Charlie, no BS, true story.
Literally, last night, trying to put my son to bed, he's like, no, Dad, I just...
What time?
What time is Charlie going to be here?
What time?
And I'm like, dude, you're in school tomorrow.
He's 13. He's like, no, no.
This morning, wakes up at 6 o'clock, and he's like, I'm coming.
He literally would not leave the house.
Did you let him take off school?
No, of course not.
He's not here for a good reason.
But the point is the point.
You canceled school for like two years.
The point is the point, which is you are making a damn dent.
Thank you.
I'm kidding.
No, but I know, but I appreciate that.
I mean, it's the reason you're here, because I think people need to understand your success, your influence, what you've been up to, and the fact that you're on these college campus doors.
And to your point, man, you just open up.
I mean, you're like, ask me anything?
Anything.
Challenge me?
Challenge me, whatever.
When did this whole thing...
When did you start putting this together?
I've been at this for 13 years, and it's been a wild movement.
Really accelerated once President Trump kind of came on the scene.
Right around, I'd say, 2021, we had a goal.
Could we move the youth vote 10 points over 10 years?
And it was literally you sat down and put that numerical together.
Yeah, like, can we move it 10 points over 10 years-ish, you know, approximate.
Because our whole hypothesis was, and we did this alongside President Trump and his great team, was that this demographic is disproportionately to the Democrat side.
We believe Democrats were taking them for granted.
We think that your side had no message whatsoever and an ideological monopoly.
We saw some of the fault lines there.
And to President Trump's credit, he also harmonized with this strategy by going on podcasting and using TikTok.
But, yeah, I mean, we did it in four years, not ten, large in part, thanks to you guys.
And we'll get to that, and sincerely get to that, because I want a stress test.
Some of those fault lines as it relates to the reality of our party and where we are today vis-a-vis your ascendancy, not just individually as an organization.
But where was that sort of moment for you?
Because it's interesting.
I mean, you're such a young guy, so it's not like deep biography here.
It's not like 20 years in the wilderness, writing his first book, getting a TV show that was canceled, coming back.
It's more just this immediacy of ascendancy.
I mean, were you sort of born and bred with an ideological mindset, or were you more open-minded, and you started to realize a lot of BS was out there?
Yeah, I've always been conservative, obviously grown in that over the last 10-ish years.
Was more libertarian, I'd say, in the first couple of years, as to be expected, as I got married and have kids become more conservative.
But no, look, just one of the things we saw in the last couple of years that the Democrats completely ignored, and your side was, Basically, not acknowledging it was happening, was the crisis that young people were experiencing.
It's the first time in America's history that a 30-year-old is going to have it worse off than their parents.
It's a breakdown of the social compact.
They are the most alcohol addicted, most drug addicted, most suicidal, most depressed, most medicated generation in history.
And the message that was largely being fed to a lot of young people...
Lower your expectations.
You're not going to have the same American dream that your parents would have.
And we saw this as an opportunity, especially with young men.
And again, this got ridiculed a lot by the press that, oh, you know, they're creating this manosphere thing.
Look, they're half of the population and necessary for any society and civilization to succeed, which is to have both strong men and strong women.
And we went about that in a very unique and creative way.
And again, the president...
He became a cultural phenomenon where no matter what you threw at this guy, he rose above it.
You'd even have to give him credit.
I mean, 700 years in federal prison, you know, states tried to kick him off the ballot.
I know you spoke out against it, but California did have a faction that tried to kick him off the ballot, right?
And despite all of that, of course, being shot, and that was kind of the crescendo of all of it, he kind of became this figure of an American comeback story.
So he personified...
What a lot of young people, especially young men, wanted back in their politics, which was an ascendant rebel attitude against these institutions that have failed them so miserably.
It's interesting.
And you keep saying we, which is interesting, and that's the organization that you created.
We would be like conservative movement MAGA. But yes, I have Turning Point USA, Turning Point Action, Charlie Kirk show.
But when I'm saying we, I mean...
More specifically, kind of those of us that saw this political moment three or four years ago.
Right.
But you were at this even before then.
Correct.
Yeah, yeah.
So when did you decide to sort of just shift your gear?
I mean, you were working for another Kirk, for his campaign.
Mark Kirk, yeah.
Mark Kirk.
So you had a political, obviously you had strong political leanings, or at least desire to sort of be in the political sphere, but not in elected office necessarily?
You just want to be behind the scenes?
Yeah, I mean, like, the biography's been written about a million times, but, I mean, Didn't go to college, wanted to go to West Point, didn't get in.
I'm an entrepreneur.
Yeah, love it.
Started this organization, and it became far more successful than I ever could have realized.
As we started to grow the organization, I recognized that there was an ideological imbalance on a lot of these college campuses, and we wanted to go about trying to offer a counterpoint of conservative...
You know, pro-freedom, pro-liberty, you know, America first ideals.
And you saw the college campuses as sort of the underbelly of the opportunity?
Or is it just more just experiential in terms of your own sort of animus towards the institution?
Well, I mean, both.
I mean, you have a sitting population of about 20 million kids that are there for four years.
There's that.
And also, again, you had nowhere to go but up.
I mean, when we started in 2012, 75% of kids on college campuses would vote for Democrats.
Yeah.
Now, fast forward to today, this last election cycle, Democrats lost the youth vote in Michigan, nearly lost it in Wisconsin, nearly lost it in Arizona.
So our goal was, hey, let's move at 10 points.
We moved at 13 points.
And this is important for your audience to know and for Democrats to reckon with, of which I see no signs that Democrats care at all that they're losing the next generation.
We're drawing record crowds.
Our ranks are expanding.
The most support that President Trump has is voters under 30.
60 percent of voters under 30 support President Trump.
That's according to Rasmussen.
You might say that's a little rich.
It might be, but it's directionally true.
Yeah.
And one of the main reasons that this has all been happening is that baby boomers have actually seen their wealth increased the last four years.
They don't buy into this whole idea that our institutions are broken or that they're in need of massive bottom-up revolutionary change.
And we see that actually Kamala Harris did three points better with baby boomers than she did in 2020. And the number one story that...
You know, James Carville, who everyone takes seriously for some reason, should have been saying, is like all Kamala Harris had to do was just do the same with younger voters that Joe Biden did in 2020. And she would be president right now.
And remind us what Joe Biden did in 2020 with younger voters.
It was 13 points better, approximately.
Oh, in terms of just the numeric system.
Again, this is kind of a combination of exit polling.
So it's really, it's a difficult science to pinpoint.
So that goes back then, I mean, to your point, in order to do that, you've got to stand for something, you've got to assert yourself, you've got to have a strategy, and you've got to implement it.
You also have to not believe crazy stuff.
And not believe crazy stuff.
And so for you, I mean, it's interesting, just, you know, this last week, I guess you were at USC, you were at University of Florida, you had thousands and thousands of folks.
So you get, to your point, your crowds are growing.
2012, where were you?
You were coming in and people were, I mean, you were taking, I mean...
You were, like, getting threats.
I mean, you still get tons of threats.
But it was, I mean, what was it like just to paint a picture of you walking to a college campus?
I had no money, no connections, and no idea what I was doing.
And, yeah, I mean, we were, I didn't even have a social media account.
I mean, it was just the ultimate startup.
And what did you just say, I'm available, and you started at this sort of debate format?
No, it was even more scrappy.
I would literally show up to UW-Madison with a card table and a big cardboard sign saying, debate me.
You know, like, here's some provocative statement.
So you're 20-something.
And I wouldn't even film it.
I was 18 or 19. 18 or 19. And you just, by the way, where does that end?
And sincerely, to be able to debate anybody at any time, anywhere, and in that environment, it's just, I mean, you can say it's just confidence, or it's just absolute, I mean, narcissism.
What is it?
I mean, just, or just...
I hope it's not the other.
But no, I mean, I guess it would just be, I mean, at the most charitable reading, it could be confidence.
It'd also just be that...
I wanted to try and challenge the predominant view.
I always loved debate and disagreement.
I love the kind of spar.
And, yeah, I also find it to be exciting.
And I wanted to try to, you know, figure out where my idea is actually that good and to kind of draw.
Stress test.
Yeah, exactly.
And were you 10x better than you were in 2012 at the format?
Probably.
Probably.
And do you study it?
Or are you just participating?
I mean, if you look at the old great debates or you're reading debating books, you're watching sort of the best.
I mean, yeah.
I mean, less about debate.
I mean, debating is a practice that can really only be refined, you know, with lots of routine and reps and repetition.
Just more about studying, you know, the great books, philosophy.
Right.
All those.
And so you make a point prior to that.
I mean, to the point you never went to community college.
I didn't even graduate community college.
I didn't even graduate community college, which is great.
By the way, I was going to college in Marin.
I got lucky.
I got a baseball coach that called me and allowed me to get to a four-year university.
I was joking with you before we started.
960 SAT. I asked you about your SAT. I don't even know.
I took the ACT. You took the ACT, which proves two things, how young you are.
Okay, so the conversation continued about college.
I wrote an entire book called The College Scam, and I should have emphasized even more.
About how the UC system, which Governor Newsom oversees, is a complete failure.
Didn't quite have time to do that, but looking back, hindsight is 20-20.
I should have interjected and talked about how broken the UC system is, how much indoctrination is happening in the UC system.
Also, Lomez, who came on our program, great guy, educated me about AB101, about how kids are required to learn DEI and critical race theory in California schools.
I did a lot of research and prep in anticipation for this conversation.
I was unaware of that, so I probably should have interjected that.
College tuition has skyrocketed dramatically, and the Democrats and Gavin Newsom have done nothing to lower the cost of college, nothing to increase career preparedness.
In fact, more and more kids are not even learning basic American history, basic civics, or basic world history.
We also talk a little bit more in this segment about my political history and some of my political leanings.
Continues.
You grew up in Illinois, right?
I grew up in Illinois.
The Midwest was traditionally more of an ACT. But this has been a point of pride for you, that you didn't do a four-year degree.
Well, yeah, because I represent most of the country.
Actually, still the majority of the country does not have a college degree.
And if I may bluntly critique the Democrat Party, you guys have become so college-credentialed and educated that you guys snobbishly look on the muscular class of this country, the people that kept things afloat and running during COVID. And yeah, I mean, the majority of the country didn't go to Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Stanford, Caltech, or Cal Berkeley, right?
Thank you.
And the Republican Party has become far more representative of them, large in part thanks to Trump.
But yeah, and look, I say it with some pride also because as an entrepreneur, I tried to build something, not just seek a credential.
Love that.
And there are, what, 11 million folks?
There are 11 million jobs out there.
You make this point all the time.
Oh, yeah.
Open jobs that don't require a college degree.
That do not require a college degree.
So when you say, and it's interesting because there's sort of that critique of the Democratic Party that we are captured by this sort of college elite.
In what respect?
I mean, stress test that for a second.
Allow me to.
What specifically are you referencing in that context?
Well, your voters.
Your voters have become nearly...
I mean, the higher you go up the education ladder, the higher the correlation it is that you vote for the Democrat Party.
It's almost a one-to-one with PhD.
It's like 75% for master's degrees, and it's 65% for four-year-old.
Why do you think that's the case?
What are the issues that sort of are identified that align in that respect?
The sloppy analysis is like, oh, they're smarter, therefore they must be Democrats.
And I think that's silly and insane.
And insulting.
I totally agree.
The deeper and more profound analysis is that...
A lot of ideological bubbles that exist on these college campuses.
They are homogeneous, not heterodox when it comes to what ideas are expressed.
And then secondly, the value system that you leave on college campuses is high trust of institutions.
So the biggest divide in America is not right versus left.
It's whether or not you generally trust institutions.
Or you don't trust institutions.
And this has been largely inverted the last 20 years.
So back in the early 2000s, Democrats were low trust of institutions.
Iraq War, anti-Bush, anti-NSA, anti-Patriot Act.
And that's when you guys had a lot of activist spark and energy.
That has been completely inverted.
So the right is now low trust of institutions, where the left is high trust of institutions.
We're the ones that challenge the COVID vaccine.
We're the ones that think that public health authorities might have lied to us during COVID. We're the ones that don't necessarily believe the government when it says that we should keep on sending money to Ukraine.
Again, that's a general rule.
There are some exceptions to that.
But when you go to college, you are trained to trust the experts, trust the scientists, trust the people that are leaders of authority.
And the Democrat Party is largely the gatekeepers of...
That kind of ideological and intellectual regime.
It's interesting.
And so from your perspective, I mean, as you advocate for people to sort of open up a worldview that is life without a four-year degree and all the opportunities that present themselves anew in that respect, are you arguing for the disestablishment, the end?
I think it's going to happen no matter what.
I mean, in 10 years, artificial intelligence is going to change everything.
And I don't know what these four-year degrees are actually doing to prepare these kids for that.
But no, as far as like, I'm not, I mean, am I advocating for the end of the pursuit of learning?
Of course not.
That's one of my big critiques, is that at a lot of these schools, they're not pursuing what is good, true, and beautiful.
It's become the oppression Olympics and a weaponized complaint seminar of people sitting in the circle and finding out.
Who's been offended the most that day?
That's not doing anybody any good.
And in fact, it creates a very weak political movement, which I think plays into one of the reasons why we were able to steamroll you guys back in November is that once there's a little opposition against a group of people that have never actually had to build the muscle mass of a very difficult and unpredictable world, whereas those of us that are conservatives, we're insulted all the time.
So think about the experience of a kid on a college campus.
They say they're graded differently because of their views.
They may or may not be right.
I think they are.
But they're definitely in the ideological minority.
You wear a Trump hat on a college campus, at least until we came around.
That was like a big sign of cultural rebellion.
So you have two choices.
You can either stop fighting for what you believe in, or you become really tough.
And you create that...
That muscle that allows you to then carry and shoulder a heavier burden.
Right.
I don't want to belabor the issues of the establishment plot called higher education.
Some have not you referred to it, though maybe you align yourself.
I wrote a whole book called The College Scan.
It's sort of stress testing that in the context of some would argue.
The contra-argument is, you know, a million dollars more in lifetime earnings, more likely to get married, less likely to get divorced, more likely to be civically engaged, and longer life spans with college degrees.
And you would say to that...
All of this is true.
It's just, not everyone that goes to college graduates.
The national graduation rate...
41% drop.
Yeah, 41% dropout.
Exactly right.
Also, half the kids that graduate college will not even end up using their degree when it comes to the affiliated jobs.
So the numbers are true at the highest income.
So about 10% of kids that go to college stretch out the averages to be really, really high.
And so, for example, you go to Caltech to study computer engineering and applied AI, man, you're crushing it, right?
You go to Cal to go study North African lesbian poetry, like...
Is that an actual degree there?
You tell me, Governor.
I don't know.
I mean, we funded, but I'm not sure.
That's one of the courses.
See, the fact you don't know?
Well, I don't know every single damn course.
I know.
It should be like, no way!
But if the fact it's a maybe, we got some problems.
Well, the fact, you know, a lot of people have explored different disciplines.
That's fine.
It's just the taxpayers shouldn't have to fund it.
Well, yeah, I mean, increasingly individuals are funding, as you know.
No, that's true.
Talk about the inversion of how we fund education.
Look, I... And by the way, just FYI, having just put together a career master plan, we had a master plan in the state of California that created the UC systems, the CSUs, and the community college system half a century ago.
We've applied the same discipline to a career master plan in the state of California.
And so I'm completely aligned with you in terms of a focus and energy there and looking at pre-apprenticeships, looking not even at apprenticeships in the traditional sense, but valuing and highlighting and signaling the value of a life without a degree, etc.
I'm not as far off on this as you are.
That said, I've got to admire what you've been able to do, not to weaponize, but to organize on these college campuses a different point of view.
And again, let's talk about some of that.
When you go to these college campuses, I love watching your TikTok, which is next level.
Clearly, that's expressed by my 13-year-old son.
I want to meet this guy.
He's coming to a Turning Point event this summer, Tampa, Florida Student Action Summit.
I actually am concerned, by the way.
You should be concerned.
But let me say, here is why I'm concerned, because you have expressed that I should be concerned as a Democrat.
That we're getting clobbered.
Yes.
That you've figured something out.
It's not me.
The president first deserves the credit.
But why?
No, no, hold on.
You were at this before Trump was Trump.
No, I know, but he...
He was a Democrat back in 2011 and 2012. Yeah, but the president deserves huge credit.
And I just have to say that as an obligatory thing, because without him, our movement would be small.
And you can appreciate that in politics.
You have to appreciate the person who is the catalyst.
For you, that's what you sort of attached an identity with him?
It was also just the catalyst.
It was a cultural moment that just opened us up.
But go back just on that, because I'm curious.
In 2012, 13, 14, who were you identifying with from the movement perspective?
I was more, like, as I mentioned, Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Libertarian.
That's where the energy really was, right?
And then President Trump comes on.
Again, I was still very early.
Especially in my political journey.
So you're looking up a lot.
You know, who's the top voices?
What do you believe?
Why do you believe it?
Yeah.
So more of a libertarian friend.
And I still have some libertarian leanings on something.
And when Trump came down that escalator, you're like, boom, that's my guy.
Not day one.
No, I was mystified at first.
Why?
Just saying this guy, there's no chance.
No, it's funny.
I actually sent out a tweet very, like 2011, when I was in high school, saying Trump should run for office.
But I was not mystified negatively.
I was like, can this really happen?
Can a guy that has no political experience come down an escalator, challenge the whole establishment?
Right.
But you didn't expect Donald Trump to come down the escalator and start talking about illegal aliens or, you know, rapists?
I didn't disagree with it.
But you didn't?
Yeah.
I didn't see that coming.
And again, this is well documented.
Early in my journey, I underestimated the silent majority that really wanted a rebalancing of the American political landscape.
So interesting.
While we may have won this election, the fight to restore our great nation is only beginning.
Now is the time to take a stand, and Patriot Mobile is leading the charge.
As America's only Christian conservative wireless provider, Patriot Mobile offers a way to vote with your wallet without compromising on quality or convenience.
Patriot Mobile isn't just about providing exceptional cell phone service.
It's a call to action to defend our rights and freedoms with Patriot Mobile.
You'll get outstanding nationwide coverage because they operate on all three major networks.
If you have a cell phone service, Or call 972-PATRIOT. So
now, then, Gavin Newsom asked me about the impact that Turning Point Action made this last election cycle.
I bragged on it a little bit, but just to reiterate, at Turning Point Action, we had over 1,000 people on the ground in Arizona, Wisconsin, chasing ballots.
We were registering voters.
In fact...
A poster from Signal Polling showed that when we visited college campuses, students moved dramatically more in President Trump's direction versus campuses we did not.
So we have two arms.
We have Turning Point USA, which is our high school and our college chapter beast.
Also, Turning Point Academy, TPUSA Faith, Blexit, all the great work that we do on digital social media.
And you guys should get involved with Turning Point USA.
And then Turning Point Action, our 501c4 organization, all about how we are recruiting candidates, trying to make the Republican Party more conservative and more Republican, how we are chasing ballots.
That is tpaction.com.
And they kind of harmonize together towards an overarching view to save Western civilization.
Now, is Governor Newsom being authentic here?
I don't think so.
I think that he was just trying to bring the temperature of the conversation down.
I always try to meet a guest at their frequency.
At the same time, you have to challenge that guest.
You have to challenge them on what they believe and why they believe it.
So this is a little bit of a conversation about how we dominated this last election cycle and what President Trump was able to do.
I believe that Turning Point Action was one of the most important outside groups.
The ballots we chased, the ground game.
And by the way, the media was always like, oh, Charlie Kirk is going to ruin the ground game for the right.
Turns out it wasn't ruined.
Turns out that we were more successful than ever before.
Watch.
So Trump then became the catalyst.
And so Turning Point became sort of next level.
Your events start growing.
You organize around that.
Turning Point Action becomes what?
The political arm.
So one is more educational.
One is more political.
And we did ballot chasing in Arizona and Wisconsin.
We were successful in that.
Alongside the Trump campaign, Arizona was the best-performing swing state.
And you're not modeling yourself out of anything because the flatness of the surrounding terrain, meaning we're the Democrats.
Are we looking at other organizing?
We were modeling off of some of the ballot chasing, ballot harvesting practices of the left.
But, I mean, again, that's a self-limiting principle.
You can't ballot chase if no one wants to vote for you.
That's right.
So, I mean, you could have the best organizers in the world, and you have 2,000 people chasing ballots in Arizona, and you're running Kamala Harris in Arizona.
What we ended up tracking through our data is that the Democrats were chasing for us, is that they were chasing low-propensity Hispanics thinking that they were all for Kamala.
And, in fact, we were looking at the precinct numbers of areas we didn't hit that moved, like, 20 points in Trump's direction.
We're like, well, thank you very much, Kamala Campaign, for getting out and chasing our ballots and, you know, for all these Hispanic men that are mechanics.
We appreciate it.
Thanks for making sure that we also won Dave McCormick's Senate seat.
Right, right.
So again, chasing is only one part of the...
Democrats, of course, are better organizers than us.
I mean, it's in your blood.
Barack Obama was a community organizer.
We make fun of it.
It's who you guys are.
You guys have labor as a backbone, clipboard and tennis shoes.
Labor less and less.
We can talk about that in a moment.
But what we always felt that we had is we felt we had better ideas and a better message and all that.
The idea was, can we combo a little bit of organizing practices with a mass movement, which is how you get a national popular vote victory and an overwhelming electoral landslide.
And so what do you see?
I sort of talked about the flatness of the surrounding terrain, meaning the Democratic Party in some respect, as it relates to it.
I appreciate your point about...
Organizing, but also coercion versus, you know, sort of forcing people to vote versus an enthusiasm and a desire to actually proactively get out.
Actually, that has a backfiring effect, too.
I totally appreciate that.
And so what do you see right now?
I mean, you know, I think you talked about it the other day.
A lot of folks were talking about that Carville article where he talked about...
Roll over and play dead.
Roll over.
In essence, he said that.
I think it was a strategic retreat, right?
That we need to come back.
Trump's starting to implode.
His numbers are getting soft.
This was even before the tariff issues, etc.
And then come back and strike went hot.
And immediately, nobody else thought about you, who's just 24-7 flooding the zone, back to my 13-year-old, owning this space, every day getting a convert, every day picking up 1, 2, 10,000 folks, continuing the momentum, coming out of this damn election.
And then I'm thinking about, we're going to stand back?
And watch you run circles around us for six months, the next two or three years, waiting for the moment to finally strike.
Strike struck me as not necessarily the best advice, and it's not a knock on Carville, who I have deep respect for.
What's your thoughts?
I don't have to.
He's read about one thing in the last 40 years, it's economy stupid, and boy, he spent down that one line pretty amazingly.
But yeah, look, I don't want to make this about Carville, but yeah, I hope you guys retreat.
You kind of like the advice.
More for us?
I mean, there's no opposition.
There's no activist spark.
You guys are posting these cringe videos on social media.
What are the videos?
What are the ones that are most cringy?
I don't know.
This, like, harmonious thing of, like, 22 senators all saying the same thing.
I didn't like that, yeah.
I didn't like it.
Go ahead.
Go do more of that.
What do you do?
What do you do?
Seriously, Charlie Kirk, give us some advice.
Get better ideas, Governor.
For example, I mean, like, if you want to, like, you have an opportunity to, like, you know, run to the middle and seize this mantle.
Obviously, you're talking to me about people.
Governor Newsom then asks my advice for the Democrat Party.
What you are about to see is the most viral part of our entire conversation.
It's Governor Newsom that has pivoted away from the consensus on the Democrat Party on a major issue.
It is an 80-20 issue against the Democrats, and it's a major debate.
We believe we are on the right side of this debate, obviously, and Governor Newsom is receiving huge backlash for this very tape.
And I politely but very firmly pushed Governor Newsom.
On why he would not speak out on this critically, I believe, civilizationally defining issue.
Here it is, the most viral element of this entire discussion.
So, like, you right now should come out and be like, you know what?
The young man who's about to win the state championship and the long jump in female sports, that shouldn't happen.
You as the governor should step out and say no.
No, and I appreciate...
But, like, would you do something like that?
Would you say no men in female sports?
Well, I think it's an issue of fairness.
I completely agree with you on that.
It is an issue of fairness.
It's deeply unfair.
Would you speak out against this young man, A.B. Hernandez, who right now is going to win the state championship in the long term?
I can see you wrestling with it.
No, I'm not wrestling.
I'm not wrestling with the fairness issue.
I totally agree with you.
By the way, as someone with four kids, you've got two daughters, right?
Two daughters.
I have a daughter, too.
And a wife that went, God forbid, to Stanford and played on the junior national soccer team.
And a guy who got into college only because I was left-handed and could throw a baseball a little bit or hit the ball for a little bit.
So I revere sports.
And so the issue of fairness is completely legit.
And I saw that the last couple of years.
Boy, did I saw how you guys were able to weaponize that issue at another level.
Not weaponized.
Well, weaponized may be pejorative.
You're right.
But you were able to- Shine a light on?
Highlight it in a way that, frankly, I- There are not that many.
We're talking about, I think, NC2A, what, 510,000?
No, no, but I just didn't realize.
It's 890 medals and trophies that we know of in the last five years.
That's a lot.
No, so let me step back and say completely fair on the issue of fairness.
I completely agree.
So that's easy to call out, the unfairness of that.
There's also a humility and a grace that these poor people are more likely to commit suicide, have anxiety and depression.
And the way that people talk down to vulnerable communities is an issue that...
I have a hard time with as well.
So both things I can hold in my hand.
How can we address this issue with the kind of decency that I think is inherent in you, but not always expressed on the issue?
No, I get it.
At the same time deal with the unfairness.
You asked a good faith question, like how do we Democrats get out of the wilderness?
This one is an 80-20 issue.
New York Times poll, right?
No, I agree with you.
We're getting crushed on.
Crushed.
And you have an opportunity in the state to be like, look, I have a heart for A.B. Hernandez.
I have a heart for the San Jose volleyball player.
Let's give them compassion.
What's not fair is just for like a woman's entire woman's sports.
I agree.
By the way, I agree with you.
I agree with you.
And it's interesting.
I stress tested this, Charlie.
I was wondering.
You know, in California, and I've been a leader in the LGBTQ place, as you know, back in 2004, was marrying same-sex couples.
And I know we have different opinion on marriage equality.
And so I've been at this for years and years.
I take a bad seat to no one.
But I was actually on the issue of sports, which in the last few years has just exploded, trying to understand and understand the 10 athletes in the NCAA, 510,000 athletes, but 10 athletes.
But how profound, and even my own friend cohort.
People saying, what the hell is going on?
Why aren't you calling this out?
When did this happen?
So in 2000, it turns out in 2014, years before I was governor, there was a law established that established the legal principles that allow trans athletes in women's sports.
But the issue of fairness is completely legit.
So I completely align with you.
And we've got to own that.
We've got to acknowledge it.
And I don't say that through the prism of politics, because you disagree with same-sex marriage on principle.
And so I'm not...
And by the way, I value the fact that you're not trying to walk away from that principle because electorally...
I'm in the minority of it.
Yeah, in the minority.
And I don't want to walk away from this principle because it's electoral, but it is an issue of fairness.
And I think Democrats have lost it.
I think that...
I wish that we would have done this podcast last week.
Last week?
Well, because the U.S. Senate just voted...
Every Democrat voted against that bill.
And I'm just telling you, like, again, I'm not one to give...
Governor Newsom advice.
You guys are giving us an 80-20 issue that is just permeating the country.
It's such an affront to our senses.
And you look at these videos, Governor, because it's not just that it's, okay, you read an article about it.
But these young men that are, you know, are in these sports, they're throwing around girls.
And it is an issue of fairness, but it goes to a broader arch narrative.
There you go.
Which is important.
No, and this, I want to hear this.
Which is this, that the Democrats, you guys will tend to view an incident through an oppressed or oppressed lens.
Yeah.
It's your training.
It comes from college.
It comes from, and we as conservatives tend to view things through right or wrong or just or unjust.
And the country is going far more in our direction and away from your direction because...
The problem with oppressor oppressed is eventually you run out of oppressors and you start creating them out of thin air.
And you start trying to say, well, these people must be blamed for all of our problems.
And that's where you get a lot of the, let's just say a lot of, for example, there's a Wall Street Journal editorial like, when will the white men shut up or stop complaining?
That does no good for anybody, right?
So what I'm getting at, though, is it's a worldview difference, right?
So that's why the issue is so much more powerful.
Of course it is, but it's also pattern recognition.
It's pattern recognition of a Democrat party that post-2020 decided to go all in.
We call it woke.
You might call it justice or whatever it is, but it's so outside of what we would consider traditional Americans' norms and customs.
And again, so...
A Democrat strategist would say, oh, Charlie, you're weaponizing stuff.
Not you, but that's a typical thing.
But the most effective ad of this election cycle, the most effective ad, you know what it is.
Devastating.
Trump's for you, she's for they, them.
Devastating.
Devastating.
And she didn't even react to it, which was even more devastating.
And let's talk about why it was devastating.
Number one, it was the trans issue that was just...
Yeah.
You know, monopolizing.
And this was even more challenging because it's issues of people that are incarcerated.
And illegal.
And illegal, incarcerated individuals getting taxpayer funded.
Yes.
Gender reassignment searches.
That is a 90-10, not an 80-20.
Right.
And then she's like enthusiastically defending it, bragging, being like, I'm all for this.
So then the conversation shifted, as you're about to see, all about wokeism.
Now, how do you define woke?
Woke is calling something racist or unjust until you control it.
I probably should have chimed in there with this chat with Governor Newsom.
I actually think I did pretty well here.
We're talking about the border crisis, all of the crimes that BLM allegedly committed, also Robin DiAngelo's white fragility.
In California, they are the petri dish of these very ideas.
Again, I was able to get some of that into this conversation.
I probably could have done an even better job of listing up one, two, three, four, five examples.
But there's only so much you could prep on.
We are prepped on homelessness and cost of living and cost of housing.
But understand, Gavin Newsom, he is the Anthony Fauci of CRT. He is the person that has been pushing forward CRT and DEI for his entire career through California.
And California is the Wuhan Institute of Virology of woke-ism.
From the UC system, Cal Berkeley, Stanford, it all happens in California and it's being taught to kids on a daily basis.
And then you had the video that, oh, it was a validator.
Brutal.
Yeah, and so...
Tens of millions, brutal.
And then the targeted focus from the Trump campaign, Next Level.
And then Charlemagne comes out on Breakfast Club is like, this is insane.
And they ran it on NFL football.
Brilliant.
Yes, and so you're trying to reach men.
It's not like...
It's a brilliant campaign commercial.
It was brutal.
It doesn't require...
By the way, we were running around just for the what the hell it's worth.
For you, she was AG at the time.
She was addressing the issue of illegal settlement.
The courts were intervening on this topic.
But she had the video where in the video she was obviously expressed support.
And so 100% right.
She was being a cheerleader for a very unpopular thing.
It was a great ad.
And I say that lightly.
But this is important.
And I want to make sure it's not just that this was like the Willie Horton ad of the 2024. It wasn't just like a Lee Atwater brilliance.
It's that it reflected truth that the voters felt.
Yeah, I appreciate that.
Because voters felt as if their country was slipping away.
Now, the Democrats have a choice.
You can say to those people, you're racist, you're Nazis, you're fascist, you're terrible.
Or you can listen and be like, why is it?
That a steel worker in Pittsburgh who's voted Democrat his entire life is voting for Trump despite all of the stuff that's been thrown at him.
And all the rhetoric that he's thrown at us in that context.
But it's a pattern, and the trans thing is just one of those things.
But the second element was also what we saw under Joe Biden was if you came to the southern border from any country and you spoke the magic words, you could go to any city you're choosing, CBP1 border app, All of a sudden, that steel worker in Pittsburgh is like, why am I paying all these taxes?
I can't afford beer.
I can't afford anything.
And so I guess my question is to you, what are the Democrats going to do about it?
I'm going to answer that in a second, but let me pull a few more threads.
You said 2020 is when you started to see the Democrats sort of...
It advanced this notion of wokeism.
It's when the awokening really started.
You know what I'm talking about.
So is it the Latinx stuff?
By the way, not one person ever in my office has ever used the word Latinx.
So can we finally put that to bed?
No more Latinx, everybody.
Well, I just didn't even know where it came from.
I'm like, what are people talking about?
Was it the pronouns?
By the way, once, once.
You'd think California invented the frame of the pronoun.
Literally, I had one meeting.
Where people started going around the table of pronouns.
One, there's been a hell of a lot of days between 2020 and today, and one meeting.
So it's not like this is...
I'm like, what the hell is...
Why is this the biggest issue?
Well, in corporate America, it's everywhere.
Okay, all right.
And college campuses.
It must...
See, that's where you reside a lot, in the college campus.
So you've got to defund these schools if they're doing the pronouns.
I'm not defund this.
Oh, Jesus.
Okay.
And so number three, what else?
I mean, you started...
What was also the big wokeism thing?
I mean, first of all, it wasn't just the projection of certain narratives, which we could obviously go through.
But it's when policy started to come forward.
And what kind of policy?
Hiring practices.
When it was, there was, we're not going to hire...
There was DEI decades ago.
Yeah.
I mean, it was just called outreach and inclusion.
But we saw mass adoption, what we saw.
And not only that, we saw pledging of billions of dollars of donations to racial justice.
Fair point.
And that was sort of post-George Floyd.
That's what I'm saying.
You had a combustible effect.
And was that wrong, I mean, to address the issue of racial inequality?
I mean, there's legitimate issues as it relates to past practices.
What was insulting to a lot of people is, number one, where's the money going?
Because the top premier BLM charity ended up being a racket, right?
With Patrice Cullors, like, where'd that $100 million go?
So all of a sudden we learn that, and all these pledges of corporate dollars were going to this woman that's, like, higher.
No, that became the poster child for the broader movement.
But number two, which I think was most important, was that it elevated then this scholarly community that was otherwise fringe, like Robin DiAngelo and other people.
And her book, White Fragility, literally the entire premise of her book is that white people need to stop being so fragile about race.
You need to sit down and shut up and hear how racist you are.
to corporations across the country.
And by the way, just so you understand, this was a phenomenon over months and months, and it didn't quite catch up in time for the 2020 election.
I do believe that if you guys would have been a little less insane on crime in the summer of 20, you would have completely clobbered us in November of 20.
It was the riots that even made 2020 close.
Right, right.
But then it was the extension of all of the, what we would call woke stuff.
Right, defund police.
Yeah, I mean, Minneapolis literally had to hold a special vote saying like, should we still have a police department?
Yeah, that's, I mean, that was lunacy.
I mean, but Governor, I don't want to- Lunacy, and by the way, you're talking to someone who's never supported a defund police movement.
No, I'm not saying, I know, but- I was explicit, but- Hey everybody, Charlie Kirk here.
Brand new year, brand new opportunities to change the world for the better.
It's easier than you might think.
You can save babies by providing ultrasounds with pre-born.
Together with the Sanctity of Human Life Month, we're going to save 35,000 babies to show the world that not only do we believe life is precious, but we're going to do something about it.
Your gift of pre-born will give a girl the truth of what's happening in her body so that she can make the right choice.
What better way to start this new year than to join us to save babies?
And $28 a month will save a baby a month all year long.
A $15,000 gift will provide a complete ultrasound machine that will save thousands of babies for years and years to come.
We'll also save moms from a lifetime of pain and regret.
I am a donor to this organization, and you should be too.
Start this new year by being a hero for life.
Call 833-850-2229 or click on the preborn banner at charliekirk.com.
That is charliekirk.com and click on the preborn banner.
I'm a donor.
You should be too.
charliekirk.com preborn banner.
So then I asked Governor Newsom about the Prop 16 debate and the public school debate.
He was on the side of what's called Prop 16 in 2020, which would have had legal racial discrimination.
He's like, oh, I got to go look at my notes.
No, no, no, no.
You know what it is.
You know what it was.
You pushed this deeply unpopular, anti-white, anti-Asian, legal racial discrimination that lost at the polls.
And again, AB 101 has critical race theory in the schools of California.
We also talk about how the Democrats have become defenders of the corrupt establishment, FBI, EPA, critical race theory.
But also, you did support Prop 16 in 2020, which would have legalized racial...
Prejudice, right?
Prop 16 literally would...
I have to go back to my Prop 13. No, no, no.
Prop 16...
I taught 960 SAT, so a little humility.
Hold on, you're the governor of the largest state in the country.
No, no, no.
I saw your debate against DeSantis.
You're good at this stuff.
You know what I'm talking about.
Prop 16 would have had legalized racial prejudice, which got defeated by 16 points despite all the institutions.
So you're asking me, what did wokeism look like when California, when all the institutions, yourself included, with all due respect, embraced this insane ballot measure?
Guess what?
Even the people of California didn't want racial racial discrimination.
I remember California since 1996 has had Prop 209.
So the affirmative action case came from the Supreme Court as well.
It's the institutions of higher learning had no impact on California.
So we've actually it's an issue.
California also codified as a constitutional amendment marriage between a man and a woman.
And that was in the 2000s.
California runs an interesting...
I found it to be illuminating, though, that despite...
I mean, there was really, like, no opposition.
It was, like, a couple hundred, like, Asian activists.
But I just want to say, you asked the question, what did wokeism look like?
Prop 16 in California that would have had legalized racial discrimination.
That was not a major...
There was a broader national narrative.
I'm just bringing it home to you because there were hundreds of such ballot referendums, right?
There was, you know, city council meetings where they said the white people aren't allowed here, right?
That's not good.
No, it's not good.
And so what ends up happening is a broader question of sensible, not racist suburban moms that are like, wait a second, I have an eight-year-old white son.
Are you trying to say he's a racist?
And it creates a backlash that then bubbles up, right?
I appreciate the perspective.
And I appreciate not just the perspective, I totally appreciate what you just said.
As an explicit statement of fact, to make an eight-year-old feel like they're racist is absurd and outrageous.
But Governor, with all the respect, that's happening right now in California public schools.
And I'm not trying to drill you on it.
I'm just being honest.
You could say that, but maybe you should convene a special session and say no more race-based teaching against white people in the schools of California or Asians.
I'm just saying, though, that this is not a conjecture.
It's not a hypothetical.
It is embedded into the DNA of the Democrat Party.
Yeah, okay.
I appreciate it.
I mean, the CRT stuff.
Yes.
I mean, I was trying to find it.
Do you think we have CRT in K-12 education?
Well, you have the principles of it.
I mean, of course, critical theory is like a PhD level course taught by Derek Bell and Kimberly Crenshaw.
But the same way that you have advanced physics and the theories of physics in eighth grade...
It's like saying you don't have the elements of it.
But for example, I mean, it's very simple.
But at least that explains why, because I'm just trying to find it.
We know of over at least 50 schools in California that do things called privilege walks.
Do you know what privilege walks are?
What are privilege walks?
Where they make kids walk ahead based on certain questions, and they try to make a point saying, well, you see, the white people are ahead.
They must have white privilege.
Okay, I get it.
Yeah, no.
See, like...
All right, I got to get back into the classroom.
No, you got to get your...
I got six million kids.
You got to get your educations up.
1,050 school districts, the largest school system applied.
I know that.
No, but no excuse, because these things are important.
And by the way, it's the reason we're having this conversation.
This is very illuminating and helpful to me to understand sort of the animus.
What is it about...
You know, I joke with people.
I say, you guys don't like DEI, CRT, ESG, DOJ, FBI, IRS. It's all the acronyms.
It's all the damn three-letter acronyms.
What the hell is the issue?
What's going on with all that?
You know, you missed some.
Which ones?
Which others?
What have I missed?
EPA? The EPA. The Employment Prevention Agency.
Oh, okay.
You're about to get that, 65%.
Yeah, I mean, look, I mean, the...
So it's not just acronyms that we dislike for the record, but it feels like that sometimes.
And now this is the second most viral part of our conversation, where Governor Newsom thought he had me bringing up book banning.
I should have probably said this in the discussion, but saying that the Bible is pornographic is so insulting to faithful Christians across the country.
Governor Newsom thinks like, oh, I can get you on book banning.
This is how every conservative, every Republican should talk about the Banning of books.
That every single conservative Republican should talk about how the books that very well might be banned in our schools.
What are they exactly?
This is how you should stand up for it.
For decency, for truth, and for our children.
How about the book ban stuff?
On a serious note, 4,240 books or titles, libraries and schools were banned in 2023. Is that not as a conservative?
Well, it depends.
I mean, like, I think we can both agree pornography should not be taught to nine-year-olds.
Fair point.
Okay.
So that's a book ban.
All right.
Well, there are some other books.
No, no, no, no, no.
That was the Moms for Liberty contention.
Time out.
Like, I agree on Bill O'Reilly.
The Moms for Liberty movement that you made a big thing of was just no porn to 10-year-olds.
Yeah.
We agree.
So those books should be banned.
Well, okay.
So what we should do right now is every California school that has porn in their library should be kicked out.
Does that include the Bible?
Well, I wouldn't say the Song of Solomon is porn.
No, but I mean, some have made that point.
Is that a fair point?
I don't think that's fair at all.
And as a man of faith, and I deeply admire that about you.
Thank you.
Yes, but no, I mean, again, the Song of Solomon is rather risque.
No, it's very.
But what we're talking about in these books is not just the words, it's also the images.
And again, your audience can look at the images themselves.
It's highly graphic.
But again, what I... But it seems a banning binge.
I mean, at next level, sort of cancel.
But why do you think moms are doing that?
Do you think it's because they want to have mind control, or do you think that they have come across incident of incident of highly provocative material?
I love moms, but this moms, I mean, we don't have to get into Moms for Liberty.
I mean, you brought up the book bans, though.
Deeply organized for a larger agenda, but that's my humble opinion.
But let me just, you know, kind of complete the point, is that it's easy to just call it kind of a book ban, but when you actually have to read some of these books, it will take your breath away.
Of some of this stuff, right?
You're like, okay, you know, we're teaching a 10-year-old how to put a condom on.
I know.
I just have a problem with, you know, who the hell is going to decide that government?
I mean, Doron DeSantis is going to decide what I can read or say in the boardroom and the classroom.
This is the exercise of politics, though.
The exercise of politics is the highest form of community because it blends morality and sociability.
So what we do is we have discussion and elections and we have boards and commissions, right?
And we as a people say, okay, no porn for 10-year-olds.
And that's politics, right?
I mean, I'm not saying that there's like some sort of...
We've got to stress test whether the Bible's included in that.
I don't even want to go forward anymore on this.
No, it's tough, but this becomes a dialectic.
I have heard a lot.
I've never heard...
That's interesting, though.
No, I mean, it's a provocative...
I don't think it's fair.
I don't mean to offend.
Again, I deeply don't mean to offend.
By the way, Father Kaz would be offended with me.
If you think the Bible's pornographic, we have a whole...
Most of these books are quote-unquote, not pornographic.
There's sections that are...
Of images that are very violent to young kids.
Some, we would agree.
Can I just say one of those?
If you want to learn, Governor, and I'm happy that there is a movement of moms that is not, that's growing, where they feel as if our kids are being hyper-sexualized.
And I agree with them, that they are being, that they have to hear topics.
Social media?
Well, both in the social media and the classroom.
And then Governor Newsom talks all about this assembly bill.
About the most radical elements in our country when it comes to parental notification and kids' well-being and children's well-being.
You signed a law where school districts can't even tell parents if their kids are trans.
Not true.
Okay, then.
No, they can.
They just can't get fired for not doing that.
And it wasn't just trans.
They can't get fired for not doing that.
The law was explicit, said you can't be fired for not.
Snitching on a kid, not just for being trans, for being gay.
And my point is, how in the hell...
But shouldn't the parents know?
Is telling parents snitching?
No.
The teachers themselves have the right...
The law is...
They can do that.
They can do that.
We're not saying you can't do that.
We're saying you shouldn't be fired if you choose not to say Johnny was talking about liking some other boy or something.
That's a charitable reading.
It's not charitable.
It's actually the freedom not to snitch.
Let me tell you the other way to say this.
That a teacher of course should be fired if you don't notify a parent of what's happening to their kid.
Of course they should be terminated for that.
I want these teachers to teach.
And by the way, if they feel like the health or safety of the kid, they have a responsibility to communicate.
They still can.
By the way, we're not selling these teachers they can't.
We're saying they won't be fired if they don't look around and say in the recess, there were two boys.
Why didn't you see that?
You're fired.
You should have said something because they're talking about...
But there of course should be a penalty measure, whether it be termination or whatever.
If a teacher withholds information from a parent, because what you're saying is that there's no way to hold them accountable.
Accountable to what, though?
Accountable to two kids talking about the fact that they're talking about subject matter.
All of a sudden now we have to have teachers policing speech or conversations that kids are having.
I think you would even agree, Governor, that is an over-extreme example.
What we're talking about is if, which happens a lot, unfortunately, is if a young girl says that, hey, I want to transition.
And the teacher accommodates and affirms it, and the parent doesn't even know.
I have met parents like that in this state.
I heard Trump, and then they come back, and they're away.
There's so much extreme work in this space.
I will say, and we don't have to wrestle too much on this topic, but you guys will lose on these topics, and you might disagree.
But again, I'm one of those guys, and Charlie, I appreciate, and I, by the way, appreciate the civility in which we're engaged in this conversation, sincerely.
I don't mind losing.
Sometimes you lose on principle.
It's one of those things, everything's not political, is the point.
And sometimes the principle, and by the way, mad respect for you, abortion and same-sex marriage.
I hold views where the American people don't agree with me.
Exactly.
But I admire that on principle.
But for me, it's not just political.
And I appreciate you making that point.
I deeply am mindful of the politics of this, which are very unhelpful.
Personally, it's unhelpful.
More broadly, professionally, the Democratic Party and our brand.
And one of the reasons, to your point, the Democratic Party brand has just been crushed.
Your self-awareness is helpful to know, because it is deeply unpopular, and I think that is an ascendant political force that is not going away.
No, I appreciate it, but I also appreciate you hold deeply unpopular beliefs as well.
Of course I do, but I... But you're not running for office.
I'm not going to run for president as a moderate.
What are you running for office?
I'm not running for anything.
I saw a poll in Arizona that you were like one or two.
You have the highest name ID and a favorability.
When are you running?
Is that what this is all about?
No, it's definitely not about that.
By the way, you're not even old enough to be president.
You're only 31 years old.
I mean, you and AOC. You're going to run against AOC? I'm running for, you know, head of, you know, most popular TikToker.
But, no, I'm not running for anything.
So then Governor Newsom asked me about running for office.
I'm not running for office.
Do you guys think I should run for office?
You guys should put in the comments of whether or not you guys think I should run for office.
I think I'm more effective doing what I'm doing here, reaching millions of people, starting a mass movement, running Turning Point USA. So go in the comments and let me know what you think.
If you are a private student loan debt borrower, listen carefully.
Great patriots here.
Private student loan debt in the U.S. totals about $300 billion.
About $45 billion of that is labeled as distressed.
Why refi refinances distressed or defaulted private student loans that others will not touch?
Why refi does not care?
at all about what your credit score is.
If your private student loan debt is keeping you up at night and ruining your life, you guys should check out YREFI.com.
That is Y-R-E-F-Y.com.
YREFI.com.
So check it out right now.
YREFI.com.
Do you have a co-borrower?
YREFI can get them released from the loan.
You can give your mom or dad a break.
You can even skip a payment every six months up to 12 times.
It may not be available in all states.
Go to YREFI.com.
That is Y-R-E-F-Y.com.
That is YREFI.com.
So check it out right now.
YREFI.com.
You don't have to ignore the mountain of student loan statements on your kitchen table anymore.
Go to YREFI.com.
That is Y-R-E-F-Y.com.
By the way, should we ban TikTok?
No, we should not.
I used to say that.
Yeah, why did you change your position?
Because it was politically expedient or Trump told you to?
Well, no, definitely not Trump.
I sent out a tweet, and I'm perfectly honest about this.
I think you'd respect this, is that I was so mad at them because they would ban me all the time.
And I sent out a tweet saying like, hey, if you guys are really for free speech, as a creator, like, let's see it.
Get a call from TikTok a couple hours later.
We're going to show you that we're for free speech.
We're going to show you the power of the platform.
Right.
And I saw real changes where our campus interactions went from being banned to now well over two and a half billion views on TikTok.
And so I wouldn't say expedient.
I'd say impact.
And also...
They now have changed some of their speech codes.
They've changed some of their...
Hey, enough for your son.
Your son finds my content somehow.
Look, I used TikTok.
I wasn't out there trying to champion the band.
I just love this conversion.
It's a hell of a conversion.
Hey, I'm open about it.
I appreciate it.
And then...
French Laundry comes up.
There's a major platform difference between Democrats and Republicans.
Long-form media versus legacy media.
Politics is now culture, and we dominate the new media landscape.
I do not think Democrats are able to exist in a long-form podcasting environment.
They can't defend their ideas.
As soon as you turn off the teleprompter, they freak out.
We are ascendant.
Those of us that believe in America, believe in freedom, believe in liberty, believe in borders, want a strong country, want men to be men and women to be women.
We are the dominant political force because we could defend our ideas without someone whispering in our ear, giving us prepared notes.
Governor Newsom seemed a little uncomfortable.
So back to the Democratic Party.
We're not aligned with them.
They don't trust us.
I think we have 31% favorability, 57% unfavorability.
I'm surprised it's that high, Governor.
And by the way, thank you.
31% favorability is not good enough.
So back to just the basics.
You talked about wokeism, broadly defined.
We talked about some specific examples of that.
You began on the transport, which is interesting, and I respect and appreciate.
I want you to speak out against that one, Governor.
I appreciate it.
We just did, of all of you.
By the way, I've been saying that.
It's so interesting it gets picked up.
And that maybe goes to the question.
We live in these filter bubbles.
We're talking to ourselves.
We're in the sort of, you know, it's Newsmax, One American News, Fox, and then it gets into all the stuff that you guys are doing and everybody else.
And meanwhile, I'm safe over here at MSNBC and CNN, reading the New York Times, feeling really great about things and having a nice glass of Chardonnay, listening to Rachel Maddow, self-medicating and just going, yes, yes.
At the French Laundry, of course.
Yeah, at the French.
That's, of course, the only place I eat.
Can you get me a table?
I'm struggling.
Great takeout and the whole thing.
Well, I should have been at Applebee's.
I get it.
Applebee's America.
I read the books.
Come on, man.
In-N-Out Burger.
Jesus Christ.
And here's a guy who makes 25 times more money than I do.
Sitting here with a jacket.
And I'm sitting here with a senior t-shirt.
And you control the fifth largest economy on the planet.
We don't control.
The people control the fifth largest economy.
And by the way, proud that you know it's a $3.89 trillion economy.
With a declining population.
No, the population went up last year.
The population went up last year.
Yeah, because of the illegal border.
We'll talk about that later.
I got a whole thing.
290,000 net last year.
By the way, 394 National Guard that I put down at the border six years ago.
You should be championing that as governor of California.
394 we have down at the border.
We've been focused on fentanyl.
I've been working on this.
But anyway, you're getting somewhere complimentary.
Yeah, I was.
Going back to...
You're talking about your whining and dining at French Laundry.
Yes, I was talking about the importance of never.
Well, I can't help you with a reservation.
I get such a kick out of this whole shtick.
I've got to be honest.
Very nice.
By the way, we couldn't have this conversation with that conversation.
Dumbest bonehead move my life.
Own it.
Move on.
Grow up.
Is that you talking to yourself?
That's me talking to myself.
I'm staring right at you in the eyes as I say that just to get your reaction.
That said, we are...
We're losing.
I feel it's asymmetry of Donald Trump and Elon Musk sending out tweets or you doing social media and me doing a three-minute hit at three o'clock in the afternoon on CNN. I mean, how the hell do we compete?
We're toast.
Well, I mean, part of it, and credit to you for doing long-form podcasting, because long-form podcasting does penetrate different audiences, right?
And our show does very well.
Part of the problem of the Democrat Party, that for the health of the country would be great to change, is that Democrats cannot survive in long-form podcasting environments.
Why?
It's too unscripted.
It's too masculine, honestly.
And the Democrat Party's become too feminine.
What is masculine about a podcast?
Honestly, because I get the whole manosphere, this bro podcast stuff.
To go into the wilderness with no rules and duel it out and see who's better or who's stronger.
No, seriously.
Democrats can't.
We don't do it.
You're right.
For whatever reason, don't do it.
You can laugh, but who in the Democrat Party...
We're not.
You're right.
We'll go.
I mean, maybe Bernie Sanders.
RFK when he was a Democrat.
Bobby, who's now HHS. But there's something to be said that if you want to earn the respect of forgotten America, you have to show them that you can intellectually joust.
With no script, no hard breaks, no producers in the ears, no teleprompters.
That's where new media is going.
Now, I will only challenge one thing you say.
I am reaching new audiences.
I'm not talking to my bubble.
Because our content is so appealing, it goes in a decentralized way.
And it's not just political.
No, it's not political.
But again, our conversation here is going to go far and wide.
A lot of people are going to see it.
A lot of people are going to consume it.
Because it's also politics and entertainment have...
Right.
Right.
And the old adage is, well, politics is downstream from culture.
I think politics and culture are indecipherable from one another now.
Donald Trump became a cultural phenomenon, right?
You go in to, you know, inner city Compton, you'll see guys with Trump shirts with, you know, the hand up, you know, fight, fight, fight.
So what Democrats are doing is you're still playing in a very old, hypersanitized media environment.
And my advice is you got to go where it's unpredictable, where it's treacherous, where it's dangerous.
I would make a more provocative argument that you wouldn't necessarily resonate with, which is that you guys have not built the intellectual muscle over 30 years because you all agree with each other all the time.
Not like conservatives are massively disagreeing at the moment.
Trump has completely collapsed the conservative movement.
I would push back a little bit.
I would disagree.
We have a robust discussion.
It seems like Congress is really doing great oversight of Trump right now.
They're holding him to account.
That's an important but separate issue.
I just want to finish the point and we can talk about Congress, which is that in the Republican Party, we have immense and vocal and public spats all the time.
I think you would agree.
We fight about foreign policy.
Look at Ukraine, right?
We're talking about primary challenging some of these senators that were meeting Zelensky last week.
The Democrat Party would never do that.
Now, I think that is a symptom of an underlying thing.
We're constantly trying to find the approximation of what truth is.
We're trying to use dialogue towards, hey, who's right?
What do you believe?
Why do you believe it?
And it's by no coincidence that out of the long-form podcasting genres, the top ten, eight of them are conservative or center-right.
Rogan, Megyn Kelly, Theo Vaughn.
The Paul brothers, our program, Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh.
There's a singular one on the left, which is Pod Save America, which is just like a bunch of Obama bros agreeing with each other for 90 minutes and saying that we're not very smart.
And, you know?
And so, anyway, but I... I appreciate it.
No, but it's an objective truth, right?
I mean, you just dominate this media.
It's medium, but so what, I mean...
Everything Democrats do and everything how Democrats operate is from the mindset of oppressor versus oppressed.
Not what is fair or just.
You see, we as conservatives talk about what is right or wrong, not just who the biggest victim is.
Every way the Democrats look at issues, and you can see Gavin Newsom has been programmed to believe this throughout his life, is to look at where is the victim in the situation.
We look at what is moral or immoral, right or wrong, fair or unfair, just or unjust.
We then talk about how I do not drink.
He seemed very surprised by this, considering he owns a very nice vineyard in Napa Valley.
So you can see I kind of slipped that in there.
He asks what Democrats I like.
I want you to guess before you watch this how I answer what Democrats I actually like.
But there is this unhealthy purification process that Democrats go through where they kick any nonbelievers out of their ranks.
Democrats are pushing people out of their own party.
And we are far more ideologically healthy and diverse.
You see, for us and in our party, we believe the best ideas win.
Democrats believe the most oppressed wins.
And what I should have probably brought up, and looking back, hindsight, again, I thought I did pretty well, but looking back, I should have said, Governor, you guys had to nominate Kamala Harris under these rules.
You could not jump over Kamala Harris because she was a black woman.
Since she was a black woman, you were not able to jump over her.
Otherwise, they could have got to a better candidate.
And deep down, I think Gavin Newsom knows that he has no place in the Democrat Party as a white man.
Deep down, they hate him.
His whole party is configured against him.
But it's interesting.
You're making a deeper argument that we're not, and you didn't say it again in a maligning way, but that we're just not capable because we're not hardwired.
Well, I think it's two things.
Well, I think that it's two things.
Number one, your upbringing in college campuses does not foster debate like it used to.
It just doesn't.
It's that it's about silencing the critic and the elevation of the victim.
So you do not have the practice of robust having to defend your position.
It's very monolithic.
It's very centralized.
It's very top-down.
It's quasi-authoritarian.
And then secondly, I would just say that the philosophy on the worldview, as I mentioned earlier, that you guys have adopted, is that thou which is oppressed will get the most points.
You guys don't have thou that has the best idea wins.
And because of that, you guys have an elevation of, like, hey, we're going to eventually, we're just going to have a small subset of a minoritarian, hectoring, hall monitor assistant principal vibe.
Of people telling you that you're not allowed to say these words and you can't say that.
And we call that political correctness, which in and of itself is hyper-authoritarian.
So if you seek to understand why young men are rebelling, it's like, no, I'm not going to go along with this anymore.
For example, maybe I'm going to send out a stupid tweet when I'm 17 years old.
When I'm 26, I shouldn't have to get fired because of that, right?
I'm glad to hear you say that.
I remember back when I was lieutenant governor, I think Bill Maher was trying to get on the UC campus or something.
They were saying, Bill Maher was too conservative a voice, and we called that out at the time.
But it's equally insane that people are boycotting Bud Light.
I mean, how is that not called out?
I don't drink.
You don't drink at all?
By the way, that's interesting.
You don't?
Never have?
I have, yeah.
What happened?
What, a couple years ago you stopped?
I stopped, yeah.
Why'd you stop?
I just wanted to be more successful.
I love that.
What were you drinking?
Napa Valley wine.
Oh, Jesus Christ.
Here we go.
Right?
Are we going to get a little...
Stop using my Lord and Savior in vain like that, man.
By the way, forgive me.
I deeply respect...
And by the way, do respect your faith.
I'm serious.
It's like the fourth time.
Come on.
No, I don't drink.
But yeah, I mean, look.
But first of all, we have the agency to boycott whatever we want.
But understand...
No, but I mean, isn't that cancel culture in reverse?
I mean, a lot of cancel culture on the right right now.
It's something completely different.
First of all, cancel culture is someone in power using their power to cancel somebody that doesn't have power.
That's cancel culture.
Time out.
Hold on.
Bud Light was people that don't have a lot of power, consumers using their agency to say, no, powerful corporation, I'm not going to voluntarily associate with you.
But cancel culture has always been the incumbent person with power, a governor, a principal, a boss, a CEO, a corporate board, going against the weaker.
What we did with Bud Light was just a bunch of decentralized folks doing a good old-fashioned boycott.
Completely different.
But a boycott is not...
I mean, well, there's boycotting speakers.
There's boycotting.
That is a derivative of cancel.
But the culmination of cancel culture is somebody who has a power position wrongly canceling, filing, terminating.
I appreciate that perspective.
So let's go back to Democrats being totally incompetent, incapable of spending 30, let alone 45 to an hour having a conversation broadly on podcasts.
I said you're becoming the exception.
You're in the process of becoming.
You're not there yet.
It's like becoming Gavin, like becoming Michelle, right?
So who do you, are the Democrats you do, literally, any Democrats you admire out there right now?
I mean, even beyond just the podcast thing, that you look and say, Jesus, there's hope.
You've got to stop saying that.
Forgive me.
There's hope.
We can edit that out.
No, I don't care.
You can keep it in.
I used to have respect for Bernie on his anti-war stance, and now he's a complete neocon.
He's a complete neocon now, so he's not there.
Democrats, I respect.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, Bobby Kennedy, I respect.
Tulsi Gabbard.
Why are you laughing?
Why are you smiling?
Because, like, they're on our team now because you guys kicked out, like, your best people.
It's like the people that were...
This is a great point, though, Governor, is that Bobby Kennedy was a heterodox opinion on a thing that a lot of people were concerned about.
Get him out!
He's an anti-vaxxer.
Tulsi Gabbard, who was an anti-war, get her out!
She's a Russian agent.
You guys see how you have an unhealthy purification process where eventually you're left with just a 31% approval rating?
And a bunch of people that are talking to each other.
And meanwhile, we're the ones that have Democrats in our cabinet winning the electoral majority vote.
Because there needs to be said, if Democrats are serious about being a majority party ever again...
When somebody has a disagreement, for example, if there's a pro-life Democrat, is there a place for a pro-life Democrat in the Democrat Party?
I mean, there should be.
Okay.
On principle, there should be.
Absolutely.
That's a deeply held personal point of view.
God bless.
I agree.
Not every party or Democrat official would say that, right?
And so certain states have different opinions on that.
And I say this as one of the biggest champions for reproductive freedom on the planet.
Trust me, I know.
But the issue, though, is that that is a one-stop purity test.
We have pro-choice Republicans.
Susan Collins is a pro-choice Republican.
No, and Trump himself decided to pivot a little bit.
He's more pro-choice than I am, for sure.
But what I'm saying, though, is what you see in the Republican Party is the best, in my opinion, culmination of modern politics, and it doesn't get appreciated.
Look at that ideological diversity.
We have people...
That, you know, geez, they want to go to war with every country that says something bad against us.
And then we have people that are far more dovish, you know, like Rand Paul.
But that is a better, more, dare I say, diverse picture.
You could say diversity is our strength.
Oh, look at you.
Look at Charlie Kirk.
Diversity is strength.
I mean, I want to end the podcast right there.
But first...
I said you could say.
You could say.
I want to...
Do we have ultimate editing here?
No, you better not edit any of this for the record.
We're not going to edit any of this.
And by the way, no reason to edit any of this, despite my use of inappropriate words here and there.
Hey, Charlie Kirk here.
Ever see your dog slowing down or having health issues and wonder, what can I do to make them better?
Well, my friend, add rough greens to your dog's food for 90 days and you'll see changes that will amaze you, guaranteed.
Invented by naturopathic Dr. Dennis Black, Rough Greens wants to invite you and give your pup the Rough Greens 90-Day Challenge.
In the first 30 days, you'll see shinier coats and increased energy.
By day 60, your dog will have a stronger immune system, less shedding, and improved joint function all due to live nutrients you've added to their diet.
And at 90 days, better digestion, reduced inflammation, improved heart health, and you might even have reduced their cancer risk.
Fetch a free Jumpstart trial bag for your dog today.
Go to ruffgreens.com.
Just use promo code Charlie.
That is ruffgreens.com, promo code Charlie, and just cover shipping.
You don't have to change your dog's food.
To improve your dog's health, just add a scoop of ruffgreens.
That is ruffgreens.com.
Here's the final advice that I gave to Gavin Newsom.
Not my best advice, as you'll see.
I only gave him my B or C advice.
I asked him if he's working with ICE. This is just so fraudulent, by the way.
I probably should have called this out even more.
It's just so nonsensical.
He's not doing anything on the southern border.
He's not assisting with detainers.
There were 7,000 people in California that had ICE detainers on them that were not touched at all.
Also talking about the quality of life.
Everyone here in this audience, your quality of life has slipped dramatically in recent years thanks to big government Democrats just like Gavin Newsom.
Thanks to the one-party rule of states like California.
California has the highest housing prices, the most homelessness, the second highest housing prices, the highest cost of living.
And what are they doing about it?
Blaming Republicans?
The quality of life has slipped dramatically in the great state of California.
And Gavin Newsom is solely responsible for the downfall of San Francisco and the downfall of California.
Let me ask you, just on the Democratic Party side, forgive me, I do want to just, look, where, so our effort to get out of the wilderness, you know, on the woke culture wars, on some of these issues, on providing a more diverse campus, dare I say, of opinion and pulling people in.
But what else do you, I mean, do you feel this party, I mean, you had a point that the Republican Party is now going to be the dominant and Senate party.
I'm not saying that, I don't have that kind of pride.
I'm not saying, I'm saying right now we are the ascendant worldview, but we could screw this up easily.
You have to have the humility to say that.
But like, as of the recording of this podcast, we have a majority approval rating, won the electoral, I mean, all that stuff.
Right.
And in both houses, I mean, we could screw it up.
And you guys could adjust or adapt.
Okay, so this was the question that I'm not articulating very effectively.
But I remember so many of the similar contours of this conversation we were having in 2004 and 2005.
You just got shellacked both houses of Congress.
Republicans, you had a Republican president that won the popular vote, the last Republican president to win the popular vote.
And two years later, you had Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Four years later, you had 53% of the vote, the highest since 19, what, I don't know, '64.
It's conceivable that could happen now.
I don't say that's impossible.
If you were in my camp.
What is that?
Oh, I'm not going to give you my best advice.
I want your best advice.
I'll give you like the B or C level advice.
Okay, give me the B plus advice.
All right, because the secret stuff, I'm not sharing.
No, what is your secret stuff?
Why don't we go right to there?
That's secret for a reason.
What is it?
Is it technical or is it substance?
Oh, it's all of it.
I could design your presidential run in a way where you would win.
I'm not talking about a presidential run.
We're not talking about a presidential run.
This is not about that.
No, no, no.
By the way, you guys are so obsessed with the idea that every goddamn thing I do, I said it again.
Yeah, I said it again because I needed your emotional reaction.
That everything I do...
It's framed in that context.
Talk about Trump derangement syndrome.
I think you got one with California.
First of all, it's not new to have someone from California run for the presidency.
We just beat someone from California to the presidency.
California is the politics to the Democrat Party as Florida is our party.
You guys have the former Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, right?
You have a lot of the ascendant political voices come out of the state.
Derangement syndrome.
No, it's knowing your enemy and looking at the horizon and understanding what's coming.
But anyway, if I were to give you or somebody advice, I'll give you the BNC-level stuff, which is very simple.
You have to go to war with your own party on three major things.
You've got to say, we are not going to do this illegal immigration thing anymore, which includes, like, are you going to work with ICE? We do work with ICE. By the way, just so people can do this.
We have been.
I, in fact, directly, we actually put out the data.
I actually reached out to the administration saying, are you not aware that California coordinates and cooperates with all CDCR releases over 10,000?
That's great.
So explain the sanctuary state thing then.
What is the difference?
You've got the statewide sanctuary state and you've got local sanctuary cities.
Which Governor Brown signed it, not you.
Yeah, which in the statewide framework allows us to work as it relates to issues of criminals and coordinating the release of criminals from our state prison population.
We coordinate with ICE on the deportation.
We've done that over 10,000 times since I've been governor.
We're not denying access.
We're not...
I'm glad to hear that.
That's why I asked.
For criminals.
Sanctuary policy was never...
I would say if you break into the country illegally, 8 U.S.C. 1325 is breaking a federal law, right?
I get it.
It's civil, not criminal.
But it is a federal law.
I get it.
So, by the way, if you're serious about moderating the party, 8 U.S.C. 1325, the vast majority of Americans...
Let me just go through it.
The vast majority of Americans want mass deportations.
It's just the thing.
Until they don't.
That's my humble opinion.
Until they don't.
Someone who's been here 10 years paying taxes, I don't buy it.
But at the moment, you're right.
You might be right.
We'll see.
Number two, we mentioned the trans stuff.
It's an affront to all of our senses.
It's out of control.
You don't believe in it fundamentally.
It's not just sports.
It's not stuff.
You just don't.
Charlie Kirk's views are separate than the political advice.
But if you'd like me to do a whole...
No, I get it.
Charlie Kirk asked me anything and you could show up to Cal State Northridge on Thursday.
I've got 25 TikToks of what your feelings are.
So actually, that was a question I didn't even ask.
If you want it, it's fine.
I just don't think that's the best use of our time.
But on the political advice is that Americans increasingly believe...
That their good-heartedness and charitable nature towards the LGBT issue has overblown, especially with youth sports, youth curriculum, and the chemical castration of our kids when it comes to this medical therapy.
And you seem that you want to really...
I encourage you, Governor, to learn about some of the butchery under the guise of health care that is happening under chemical castration in this state and in other states.
We don't have to spend a lot of time on that, but the American people are overwhelmingly against it.
They're overwhelmingly against it.
I think we have to be more sensitized to...
Youth should be off limits.
I think that's the political direction things are going.
You might be right on deportations.
I know I'm right on this.
I know that this issue is picking up steam.
There is no good counter to it.
The CAST report, the United Kingdom CAST report, the NHS came out and said there's no good reason to ever operate surgically on a young person.
Puberty's not the problem.
Puberty's the solution.
I'm not an expert in this, but I appreciate your broader...
But I'm saying politically, it's a turbocharged issue that is kicking the tail of Democrats.
The third one, though, is quality of life.
Is quality of life...
I agree with you on this one, especially.
But, like, I mean, look...
No, but homeless encampments out of control, unacceptable.
Yes, but...
Issues of just quality of life is right to the crime.
You know where I'm going with this.
Why is it you were able to clean it up for Xi Jinping, but you can't clean it up?
Oh, that was you guys.
That was the dumbest thing I've ever heard of.
By the way, you guys weaponized that?
I saw that on 25 things.
It was the most ridiculous.
Yeah, that was...
That was...
You know what?
I will happily...
Happily revert back to your counterpoint.
Can I have the streets as clean as Xi Jinping?
In this case, weaponized.
In this case, weaponized.
Can I get the Xi Jinping streets back?
It was ridiculous.
Give me a break.
Governor, with all due respect, I saw a beautiful picture of San Francisco that looked like Singapore.
And then Xi Jinping leaves and the Walking Dead come back.
By the way, it was AIPAC. You had dozens and dozens of foreign leaders.
And California is not San Francisco.
But I'm the governor of California, not the mayor of California, not the mayor of San Francisco.
You were the mayor, but I just want to understand.
Why is it that we have a cleaner?
But you have to admit, it's emblematic of something that if enough important people show up, it can get clean.
So why not make it clean all the time?
That's exactly my...
By the way, that's my energy.
I think you've missed a lot of my...
I've been saying that to all these mayors.
State vision is realized at the local level.
It's about accountability, transparency.
If you can't clean up the streets, we're going to redirect the money.
I hope the new mayor can do that, right?
He seems to be more moderate than the other.
Great progress is being made.
By the way, what's going on with homelessness in all these red states?
You're seeing it through the roof.
Went up 18% across the country.
I'm not here defending every red state of what we're doing, right?
But I'm making the point.
This is hardly unique to California.
I'm sure there's a lot of governors and mayors.
Quality life's huge, right?
And the housing crisis, of course, came up.
What are we going to do to help young people buy more homes?
Do we actually agree on something?
This actually was the few moments where we agreed on something.
Gavin Newsom and I find common ground.
And then, look, the number one thing, which I know you're going to agree with, and I'm sure you'll have a super slick response, right?
That's about half true.
Which is the cost of housing.
Average home in California, $850,000.
I like what you said about BlackRock.
But that was interesting to me.
I think that is, but again, that's not a majority of house purchasing.
About one in four houses are bought by private equity.
Would you agree to say that BlackRock should not be able to own homes in California?
I think, and then turning around and renting them?
It's insane, right?
This is a huge problem across the country.
You should propose a bill in the California state house.
We've had one.
It didn't get very far last year, and there's more conversations.
A 10 trillion dollar fund shouldn't be able to come in and buy homes.
But it's not just BlackRock specifically.
No, it's the idea of mass...
Mass asset managers that have $50 billion asset under management are now competing against our college grad from Cal State Fullerton.
I love that you say this.
By the way, just in that spirit, don't you agree one of the Doge things should be dealing with the $1.5 billion of subsidies on carrying interest?
Oh, carried interest, I think, is a huge problem.
And by the way, you know President Trump has proposed in his tax bill to get rid of it.
I know he proposes it all the time, but it doesn't actually have a good effect.
Oh, hold on, but I mean, Joe Biden didn't get rid of carried interest.
That is the holy grail of private equity.
You know that, right?
No, trust me, I get it.
Carried interest, I mean.
I get it, but let's go back to housing equity.
And by the way, you're going to have a revolt in Palo Alto if you get rid of carried interest.
Yeah, I should be careful on that one.
They're going to light torches and run to Sacramento.
On the issue of housing, you couldn't be more right.
It's the original sin in the state of California, affordability, period, full stop.
And it has more impact on the issue of homelessness than any other issue because of the cost of living.
By the way, we had 188,000 people in 2005, 20 years ago.
No, I'm not saying it's unique, but it's been a long-term issue.
And housing is at the core.
We agree on the problem, but help me understand this.
You guys control the House.
The Senate will suit majorities.
You control everything.
Why can't you fix it?
You said you were going to build 3.5 million homes.
You're building like $111,000 a year.
Well, there was something called a pandemic that may have had a little impact.
Issues of interest rates may have had a little impact on housing production across the country.
You guys are still outpacing every other state.
But hold on, hold on.
Except Hawaii.
42 CEQA reform bills created a housing accountability unit.
And we're making big progress.
We've done all the rezoning.
We've been pounding in this space.
There's no administration in modern California history that's done more to reform the housing space and the regulatory space as it relates to the issue of housing.
Biggest challenge right now is NIMBYism.
The biggest challenge we have is local planning and zoning, and that's why we've been very aggressive.
NIMBY is a disaster.
We agree on that.
And so I have a YIMBY mindset on all this stuff.
I'm in the front lines of this.
Your friends, and they are your friends down in Huntington Beach, that I'm suing.
They're conservatives.
Pastors or what?
The city council?
They love you.
The MAGA faithful.
You're 99.9%.
Who's living who in rent free and whose head is one of those smaller towns?
We're suing them because of their rank NIMBYism.
We have been...
Very aggressive in this space.
I'm waiting for one big thing we all are waiting for.
And I think it had a biggest, perhaps one of the biggest impacts that we don't focus on enough in the last election.
That was interest rates.
As interest rates, that environment...
I believe they will come down.
And you're going to see an explosion of housing production.
I'm very confident in that in California.
Yeah, but you also might see an increase in housing prices, of course.
Well, to me, it's...
It's all about supply, right?
ECO 101, supply.
Yeah, it's just the biggest issue.
It's been our biggest...
California and Hawaii have the two highest housing prices in the country.
Hawaii has an obvious...
Excuse.
They only have so much land.
You guys don't have a lack of land.
By the way, I haven't been governor for a century, okay?
I mean, Jesus.
I mean, we've been six years.
And by the way, no excuse.
I get it.
You can't take credit for all the assets.
You know, number one AI, number one nanotechnology.
But you also got to take responsibility for some of the problems.
I can take a little more credit on the general AI. 32 of the top 50 market companies.
But I'm saying you have to balance both the credit and the blame.
But quality of life, right?
So when I talked to a college kid, one of the reasons they saw Trump as a vessel for a better life is that under President Trump, those first four years, we saw a material increase in their livelihood, wages, easier to buy a home, four years.
Four years, just the facts are the average wage to be able to own a home in L.A., to be able to own a home.
Oh, yeah.
It used to be $75,000 a year.
Now it's $145,000 a year.
I mean, what it does, and this is, again, it's creating...
This kind of belief system of Russian serfs of a generation that will never have the material American dream that their parents once enjoyed.
Yeah, no, and look, I think it's a full circle on this conversation where you began by identifying...
We'll circle back.
And then finally, Gavin Newsom's meeting with Trump.
Again, the fact that he would kind of still cover what Joe Biden just goes to show.
You should not trust anything this guy says.
He's like, oh, you know, Biden had great mental competency.
No, but it's a point.
The point you're making, Scott Galloway and others have been making, as it relates to this generational theft, he's spot on on this, and I think there's so much validity to you recognizing that problem.
So diagnosing is one thing.
And President Trump as well.
He deserves credit.
I mean, I think, yeah, he deserves credit.
I'm going to get you to say the words.
By the way, I just spent almost 90 minutes with him in the Oval Office a couple weeks ago.
Isn't he the greatest?
And I think it was the first Democrat invited in in Trump 2.0.
I mean, you've got to admit, there's something magical to that guy.
Joe Biden couldn't do five minutes with you.
By the way, I did almost 90 minutes with Biden right before he left in the Oval.
Do you remember?
By the way, that would be a hell of a book.
You know, 180 minutes.
I should do a book of that bookmark.
By the way, he 100% was.
Oh, come on, Governor.
Just a fact.
Do you think there was any mental decline?
No, no, seriously.
You went around the country being like, I'll take him at 100. There was one exception.
Just the one debate?
No, no, no.
Before the debate, I was about to say.
And that was the big fundraiser down in L.A. where I saw a different person.
The Clooney.
And Clooney called that out.
But it was not.
That was.
But, you know, so much of that focus was, all right, he just got back from Europe.
But that was the one time we don't need to get it.
But I just say, Governor, just on that one topic, we saw with our own eyes for three years.
And the media told us, no, no, he's perfectly fine.
And then we saw the debate.
And look, it makes us not trust our leaders.
When we say everyone is perfectly fine, the emperor is fine.
Have you seen any mental decline in Donald Trump right now?
No, I see the more sharp acuity.
You tell me you sat with him in the Oval Office for 90 minutes.
The guy has a memory of an elephant.
No, I'm just asking.
I mean, I know.
I'm just asking your personal impression.
How often do you talk to Trump, by the way?
Once or twice a week.
Is he checking for advice or is it you give him advice?
A little bit of both.
It depends if there's something I want to talk to him about.
But, I mean, he's just the machine.
He'll take every call.
You've got to give him credit for that.
Isn't it amazing?
Right?
Every call thing's big, right?
It's amazing.
And he'll listen to every idea.
He'll joust it out.
He'll talk about it.
He always goes back to, what did I promise the voters?
What was the last idea you gave him?
The last idea I gave him?
Yeah, it was like, Mr. President, here's what you need, or here's the thought.
Here's my observation.
Actually, it was interesting.
I said, I don't think Canada should be the 51st state.
We already have California, and we have enough libs in our country.
Jesus, on that, Charlie Kirk.
Thou shall not take the Lord's name in vain.
No, on that.
Governor, this is Gavin Newsom.
This has been a Gavin Newsom production.
Thank you.
This was fun.
Thanks, man.
Thanks for having me.
Thanks for coming on.
Thanks.
Whatever.
Having?
Jesus Christ.
Don't get over it.
So in closing, what are my thoughts?
I think Gavin Newsom wants to run to the middle.
Should we trust him?
No.
I don't think it's legitimate.
I don't think it's authentic.
I will say their team told us they would not edit a piece of footage, and they didn't.
And they deserve credit for that.
In a world where a lot of people will say one thing and do another, they were honest brokers.
But I don't think that Gavin Newsom is actually having a metamorphosis on any issue.
I don't think Gavin Newsom has any closely held issues.
I think he cares about what will keep him in power and get him closer to the presidency.
So, hope you guys enjoyed my conversation with Gavin Newsom.
There is now a Democrat Civil War underway, large in part thanks to our conversation.
It was good to be able to challenge one of the leaders of the Democrat Party on who they are and why they have failed the American people and also to continue to remind them they are losing young people.
